1. Is the Use of the Extended (Meth)acrylate Series - Nails Justified? Characterization of Nail Acrylate Allergy in a Tertiary Medical Centre.
- Author
-
Dascalu J, Polansky S, Khamaysi Z, Avitan-Hersh E, and Nevet MJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Adult, Allergens adverse effects, Tertiary Care Centers, Acrylates adverse effects, Predictive Value of Tests, Aged, Nails, Young Adult, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact diagnosis, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact etiology, Patch Tests, Methacrylates adverse effects
- Abstract
Methacrylate allergy is a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis, and its incidence has surged over the past decade. Consequently, the primary sensitizing agent, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, was recently added to the European Baseline Series of contact allergens. This study aimed to assess the added value of testing for allergens included in the (Meth)Acrylate Series - Nails, in addition to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, as well as to characterize patients who may benefit from more extensive testing. A retrospective analysis of medical records of patch-tested patients was conducted between June 2013 and July 2022. Among the 3,828 patients who underwent patch testing, 396 were tested with the (Meth)Acrylate Series - Nails; 153 (38.6%) of those patients tested positive for at least 1 acrylate. The most common hapten was 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (85.6%), followed by hydroxypropyl methacrylate (85.0%) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (80.4%). In our study, 22/153 patients (14.4%) would have been missed if tested only for 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. The analysis showed that including hydroxypropyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate improved detection rate to 98%, rendering the use of the entire tray unnecessary in most cases.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF