Search

Background/Objectives: Pregnant women have limited information on the impact of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) alone. Our aim was to determine if PCE, without alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drug use, is associated with altered birth outcome measures in obstetrically low-risk women. Methods: In this observational cohort study, pregnant women were recruited between 2019 and 2022 from communities in Washington and Oregon, USA, and enrolled following their first trimester. PCE eligibility required a minimum of three days/week of cannabis use during the first trimester with no required minimum use thereafter. For all participants, illicit drug, nicotine, or alcohol use was exclusionary throughout pregnancy and monitored via urine toxicology at multiple time points. Cannabis use was quantified into delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) mg/day using product weight and potency. Outcome measures included gestational age, weight, length, head circumference, and Apgar scores. Results: Study participants included 37 people in the PCE cohort and 35 controls. Average cannabis use for the PCE cohort was 198.0 mg of THC (SD = 221.2 mg)/day and 3.5 mg of CBD (SD = 4.3)/day. PCE newborns weighed less (38th vs. 52nd percentile, p = 0.04) and were shorter (40th vs. 55th percentile, p = 0.03) for their gestational age than controls. Female PCE newborns had smaller head circumference for gestational age (28th percentile; SD = 23), compared to male PCE newborns (55th percentile; SD = 32; p = 0.02). Conclusions: PCE is associated with reduced birth weight and shorter length for gestational age. The effect of PCE on brain growth may be sexually dimorphic. Future PCE studies should include sex as a biological variable and longitudinally evaluate long-term developmental and physiological outcomes.

Racial microaggressions often occur in U.S. higher education. However, less is known about how White American students reason about their evaluations of racial microaggressions. The present study investigated how 213 White college students (54.46% cisgender women) attending a Primarily White Institution in the Southeast U.S. in the Fall of 2019 justified their evaluations of the acceptability of racial microaggressions presented in vignettes. Following Social Domain Theory, to assess participants' social reasoning, we conducted quantitative content analysis of participants' open-ended justifications for their evaluations. Multiple regression analyses revealed that participants were less likely to evaluate racial microaggressions as negative the more they employed justifications focused on (a) assuming that the behaviors in the situation followed conventions of the classroom, (b) judging the professor's response as correct, and (c) asserting that the behavior was likely to happen to anyone. Further, the higher participants' endorsement of color-blind attitudes the more likely they were to evaluate racial microaggressions as appropriate. However, reasoning centered on (a) assuming differential treatment based on race, (b) perceiving the behavior as harmful, and (c) considering the behavior was against conventional expectations was associated with finding racial microaggressions to be more negative. The present study highlights the value of investigating underlying reasoning behind evaluating racial microaggressions in addition to color-blind attitudes. The findings suggest that higher education professionals should consider interventions which pay particular attention to unpacking students' reasoning, untangling acceptance of Ethnocentric narratives and providing information that challenges classroom behaviors that, while potentially appearing conventional, in fact perpetuate harm through microaggressions.

We examined US parent and youth perceptions of how life events, both positive and negative, associated with COVID-19 resulted in changes in family and youth functioning. Families (n = 105, 80% white, 48% male, and 87% mothers) completed surveys during the pandemic (May to July 2020) and 3 years prior (for youth ages M = 10.6, SD = 1.17 and M = 13.6, SD = 1.19). Declines in youth, though not parent, report of open family communication, parental support, and family satisfaction were found. Declines were associated with various domains of pandemic-related stress in parent report, though positive life events served as buffers. Pre-pandemic family functioning also predicted pandemic stress. Spillover effects in turn impacted youth functioning. The current findings shed light on how experiences of the pandemic are linked with family functioning and have implications for how to support families during this time.

Background/Objectives: Pregnant women have limited information on the impact of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) alone. Our aim was to determine if PCE, without alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drug use, is associated with altered birth outcome measures in obstetrically low-risk women. Methods: In this observational cohort study, pregnant women were recruited between 2019 and 2022 from communities in Washington and Oregon, USA, and enrolled following their first trimester. PCE eligibility required a minimum of three days/week of cannabis use during the first trimester with no required minimum use thereafter. For all participants, illicit drug, nicotine, or alcohol use was exclusionary throughout pregnancy and monitored via urine toxicology at multiple time points. Cannabis use was quantified into delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) mg/day using product weight and potency. Outcome measures included gestational age, weight, length, head circumference, and Apgar scores. Results: Study participants included 37 people in the PCE cohort and 35 controls. Average cannabis use for the PCE cohort was 198.0 mg of THC (SD = 221.2 mg)/day and 3.5 mg of CBD (SD = 4.3)/day. PCE newborns weighed less (38th vs. 52nd percentile, p = 0.04) and were shorter (40th vs. 55th percentile, p = 0.03) for their gestational age than controls. Female PCE newborns had smaller head circumference for gestational age (28th percentile; SD = 23), compared to male PCE newborns (55th percentile; SD = 32; p = 0.02). Conclusions: PCE is associated with reduced birth weight and shorter length for gestational age. The effect of PCE on brain growth may be sexually dimorphic. Future PCE studies should include sex as a biological variable and longitudinally evaluate long-term developmental and physiological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explored age-related changes in Chinese and Korean children's fairness judgments and reasoning regarding the gendered division of household labor. The majority of previous research on this issue has focused on adults' experiences and has been conducted in Western countries. Interviews were conducted with 133 children, 65 Chinese and 68 South Korean, ages 9-11 (N = 48), 12-14 (N = 43), and 16-18 (N = 42). Despite country differences in women's involvement in the workforce, in both countries women do most of the housework. Most participants across ages evaluated a hypothetical scenario in which the mother did most of the work as unfair and endorsed a hypothetical scenario in which housework was divided evenly as fair. Developmental effects were found with younger children in both countries employing more equality justifications and adolescents providing more social convention justifications. In both countries, children described their mother as doing most of the housework and, in contrast with their judgments about hypothetical situations, were evenly divided overall in their evaluations of whether this unequal distribution in their actual families was fair. Korean children were more likely to view their family's division as unfair than Chinese children and were more likely to employ equality justifications in support of those judgments. Unexpectedly, across countries moral reasoning in the form of expectations of equity rather than gender stereotyping was employed to justify an unequal division of labor. This study's findings suggest the value of investigating children's fairness judgments and moral reasoning regarding both hypothetical and actual situations.

The present study investigated how caregivers in Finland and the US recount learning and teaching care within the family, drawing on a new educational-psychological framework for care. This study applied thematic analysis to seven focus groups in the US and five focus groups in Finland composed of caregivers (N = 45). The results suggest one main theme for learning, Imperfect Mirroring of Past Parenting and Present Parenting Practice, and two themes for teaching: Actions Tell More Than Words (US) and Teaching Them To be Independent and Caring Citizens (Finland). For learning, the findings indicate that childhood experiences are transformed into an informal guide for how care should (or should not) be practiced, highlighting how the lack of systematization in learning care contributes to caregivers' need for self-teaching and unlearning what they experienced. In addition, caregivers tend to reproduce their learning experiences in teaching to care, and within this process, they focus more on pragmatic aspects of care. The various elements theorized in the Psychological Processes for Care Framework used, including identifying and anticipating others' needs and deciding on the responsibility of addressing needs, were neglected in caregivers' reports of teaching care. Implications argue in favor of psycho-educational programs for caregivers that can systematically address two pressing issues in learning-teaching care - the complexity involved in care processes and understanding the intersubjective nature of the construction of caring relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The present study set out to investigate how all the members, including children, of nuclear US families conceptualize a fair division of household labor. Background: The majority of the literature has focused on how couples perceive their family's division of labor. However, for many households, children are also present and potentially involved in the division of household chores. Thus there is a need to investigate how the whole family, rather than just couples, perceive and understand the fairness of the family's division of labor. Methods: This study employed thematic analysis of in‐depth interviews with all family members of nine primarily White US middle‐class families (N = 33). Results: This study found two main themes: (1) the kids don't do enough and that's not fair, and (2) if we agree and are happy, then it's fair. The findings highlight how children's involvement is considered in fairness evaluations, whereas a specific amount of labor is often considered less important than emotional satisfaction and agreement. Conclusion: Children are seen as important actors in conceptualizing a fair division of labor. Generational differences highlighted distinct understandings about the possibility of equality suggesting that the role of the (im)possibility of a type of division may result in other factors being used to evaluate whether a division is fair. Implications: Future studies on fairness perceptions should include both children's perceptions and expectations for their involvement by both children and parents, to better understand how family's approach conceptualizing the division of their household's labor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to explore Chinese adolescent's social and moral transgressions and strategies for self-correction. For this study, following protocols that have been approved by an Institutional Review Board, 61 Chinese adolescents living in Guangzhou—distributed across three age groups: 10- to 11-year-olds (N = 21, M age = 11.03 years, SD = 0.43 years), 12- to 13-year-olds (N = 20, M age = 12.92 years, SD = 0.35 years), and 15- to 16-year-olds (N = 20, M age = 16.15 years, SD = 0.30 years)—participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The study employed a deductive analytical approach based on prior social domain research on children's and adolescents' transgressions and strategies for self-correction. This study found that Chinese youth reported conventional transgression events more frequently than any other domain. Moreover, many of adolescents' transgressions involved academic considerations, suggesting that how adolescents' time is organized and the social expectations for adolescent behavior influence the types of transgressions and justifications adolescents will make. Furthermore, participants reported developing self-correcting strategies following 73.6% of events, while 74.5% of strategies were reported to be developed by the adolescents themselves. Therefore, the findings suggest that there is room for adults to collaborate with adolescents in developing strategies to prevent future misbehavior and to encourage youth to not only be "good" or "moral" but also to be and do better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]