Sir, In his recent article (Immunol. Today 1986, 7, 10-12) Joseph Kaplan pre- sents the hypothesis that NK cells are pre-thymic T cells which express germline V gene-encoded receptors for MHC antigens. Although not en- tirely new, this is an interesting idea which would be consistent with some experimental data. However, several pieces of evidence argue against a T-cell lineage for NK cells. Kaplan cites work showing that NK cells or 'NK cell-like' clones ex- press T-cell markers, including T3 and may rearrange the VI3 genes encoding the T-cell receptor for anti- gen. This argument is based partly on the premise that all cells which show non-specific killing in vitro are NK cells, an unsafe assumption in view of the evidence that T cells and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells can also exhibit non-specific cytotoxicity and can be differenti- ated from true NK cells 1-3. In addi- tion, recent work shows clearly that of the groups of non-specific cyto- toxic cells, only those carrying T3 also show V~ rearrangements 4'5. In contrast, cells with a classical NK cell phenotype do not rearrange V~ genes s suggesting that the T3 + cells are in fact T cells which are capable of non-specific cytotoxicity. This evidence that T cells and NK cells use different receptor elements for target cell recognition is sup- ported by the type of target cell specificity which each population ex- hibits. As Kaplan states, NK cells are not MHC-restricted and although some degree of clonality may exist, each clone can lyse a wide range of target cells of differing MHC type and even species 6. Furthermore, MHC antigens probably do not play an important role as 'antigenic" epi- topes for NK cells as many of the target cells used to measure NK activity do not express MHC antigens or have lost them in culture. Finally, Kaplan's argument that F~ hybrid and allogeneic resistance to bone marrow grafts reflects recognition of MHC antigens by NK cells needs to be reconsidered in the light of recent evidence that conventional MHC-restricted CTL may be re- sponsible for at least some of these phenomena 7.8. As further support for his hypoth- esis, Kaplan also cites evidence that NK cells are present within the thymus 9 and that the generation of cytotoxic T cells (CTL) in vitro may be prevented by depleting responder cells of asialo Gml + cells. However, Roy et al. only demonstrated NK cell activity in the thymus of mice with a graft-versus-host reaction 9. We have not found thymic NK activity under these circumstances 1° and most workers would agree that the thy- mus is normally devoid of NK activity 6. The use of asialo Gml as a specific marker for NK cells also has the difficulty that CTL may carry this marker (my unpublished observa- tions) while the ability of anti-asialo Gml to deplete the generation of CTL in vivo is not because NK cells differentiate into CTL, but because they may produce mediators re- quired for the development of CTL ~ 1. Thus, the results of most function- al and phenotypic studies are too conflicting to show clearly whether NK cells are indeed aberrant or im- mature MHC reactive T cells. The solution to this problem will require more detailed examination of both NK cells and T cells at the genetic level. Allan Mowat Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK References 1 Brooks, C.G., Kuribayashi, K., Sale, G.E. and Henney, C.S. (1982) J. Irnmunol. 128, 2326 2 Seeley, J.K., Masucci, G., Poros, A., Klein, E. and Golub, S.H. (1979) J. Immunol. 123, 1303 3 Karre, K., Seeley, J.K., Eriksson, E., Burton, R.C. and Kiessling (1983)J. Exp. med. 157, 385 4 Yanagi, Y., Caccia, N., Kronenberg, M. eta/. (1985) Nature (London) 314, 631 5 Lanier, L.L., Cwirla, S., Federspiel, N. and Phillips, J.H. (1986)J. Exp. Med. 163, 209 6 Roder, J.C., Karre, K. and Kiessling, R. (1981) Prog. Allergy28, 66 7 Daley, J.P. and Kanamura, I. (1984) J. Exp. Med. 159, 1132 8 Dennert, G., Anderson, C.G. and Warner, J. (1985)J. IrnmunoL 135, 3729 9 Roy, C., Ghayur, T., Kongshavn, P.A.L. and Lapp, W.S. (1982) Transplantation 34, 144 10 Borland, A., Mowat, A.Mcl. and Parrott, D.M.V. (1983) Transplantation 36, 513 11 Suzuki, R., Suzuki, S., Ebina, N. and Kumagai, K. (1985) J. Immunol. 134, 2139 This letter was shown to Dr Kaplan, who replied as follows: Sir, I agree with Dr Mowat that more detailed examination of both NK cells and T cells is required to resolve completely the question of whether NK cells are, as I propose, pre-T cells with germ line V-gene-encoded re- ceptors for histocompatibility anti- gens. However, this hypothesis, which attempts to synthesize in a single concept NK-cell lineage and specificity, is, to my mind, simpler and more consistent with current evidence than the alternative hypothesis implied by Mowat, i.e., that NK cells and T cells are separate cell lineages, both capable of non- specific cytotoxicity. It is simpler be- cause it views NK cells as part of the mainstream of T-cell differentiation, utilizing the germ line set of T-cell receptor V-genes for target recogni- tion, and the same lytic machinery; by contrast, the alternative hypoth- esis requires the development during evolution of a separate lineage, with another set of receptor genes and, perhaps, a distinct lytic machinery. It is more consistent with current evi- dence in that it readily accounts for the fact that NK cells closely resem- ble prothymocytes in cell marker phenotype and V~ chain expression, are clonal, and contain both MHC- specific and non-MHC-specific cells. That some cells with T~cell pheno typic markers have NK-like activity can be viewed, in fact, as evidence for rather than against the hypoth- esis. If NK cells are pre-T cells, one might expect that as they mature they, like developing thymocytes, will express increased amounts of typical T-cell markers, and will begin to express and utilize for target cell recognition a rearranged 13 chain- containing antigen receptor. Viewed this way, the distinction between 'true' NK cells and T cells .with NK- like cytotoxicity is one of degree of maturation rather than of cell lineage. Some of the specific points raised by Mowat need to be addressed. A report he cites 1 as providing evi- dence that T cells with 'non-specific' cytotoxicity can be differentiated from 'true' NK cells showed, in fact, that Thy 1 + asialo GM1 + NK1.2 + clones generated from Thy 1 spleen cells shared many similarities with 191