Search

The ensemble of odorant receptors on the antenna of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster acts as an encoder for chemical molecules. Chemically similar odorants elicit activity in similar subsets of the receptors, spanning a so-called chemotopic feature space that enables chemical similarity search. A compound signal of receptor activity can be read out by calcium imaging of the antenna, yet without revealing corresponding receptors on different antennae. Employing Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) for multiple sets, we show that a consensus feature space can nevertheless be recovered from a group of variable antenna sensors that all respond to a common sequence of odorants. In the chemotopic consensus feature space, properties of novel odorants can be inferred, demonstrating how fruit fly antenna chemosensors may be employed as an alternative to electronic noses.

Summary Background Drosophila learn to avoid odors that are paired with aversive stimuli. Electric shock is a potent aversive stimulus that acts via dopamine neurons to elicit avoidance of the associated odor. While dopamine signaling has been demonstrated to mediate olfactory electric shock conditioning, it remains unclear how this pathway is involved in other types of behavioral reinforcement, such as in learned avoidance of odors paired with increased temperature. Results To better understand the neural mechanisms of distinct aversive reinforcement signals, we here established an olfactory temperature conditioning assay comparable to olfactory electric shock conditioning. We show that the AC neurons, which are internal thermal receptors expressing dTrpA1, are selectively required for odor-temperature but not for odor-shock memory. Furthermore, these separate sensory pathways for increased temperature and shock converge onto overlapping populations of dopamine neurons that signal aversive reinforcement. Temperature conditioning appears to require a subset of the dopamine neurons required for electric shock conditioning. Conclusions We conclude that dopamine neurons integrate different noxious signals into a general aversive reinforcement pathway.

The neural representation of a sensory stimulus evolves with time, and animals keep that representation even after stimulus cessation (i.e., a stimulus “trace”). To contrast the memories of an odor and an odor trace, we here establish a rigorous trace conditioning paradigm in the fruit fly,Drosophila melanogaster. We modify the olfactory associative learning paradigm, in which the odor and electric shock are presented with a temporal overlap (delay conditioning). Given a few-second temporal gap between the presentations of the odor and the shock in trace conditioning, the odor trace must be kept until the arrival of electric shock to form associative memory. We found that memories after trace and delay conditioning have striking similarities: both reached the same asymptotic learning level, although at different rates, and both kinds of memory have similar decay kinetics and highly correlated generalization profiles across odors. In search of the physiological correlate of the odor trace, we usedin vivocalcium imaging to characterize the odor-evoked activity of the olfactory receptor neurons in the antennal lobe. After the offset of odor presentation, the receptor neurons showed persistent, odor-specific response patterns that lasted for a few seconds and were fundamentally different from the response patterns during the stimulation. Weak correlation between the behavioral odor generalization profile in trace conditioning and the physiological odor similarity profiles in the antennal lobe suggest that the odor trace used for associative learning may be encoded downstream of the olfactory receptor neurons.

Summary P II -type signal transduction proteins play a central role in nitrogen regulation in many bacteria. In response to the intracellular nitrogen status, these proteins are rendered in their function and interaction with other proteins by modification/demodification events, e.g. by phosphorylation or uridylylation. In this study, we show that GlnK, the only P II -type protein in Corynebacterium glutamicum , is adenylylated in response to nitrogen starvation and deadenylylated when the nitrogen supply improves again. Both processes depend on the GlnD protein. As shown by mutant analyses, the modifying activity of this enzyme is located in the N-terminal part of the enzyme, while demodification depends on its C-termi- nal domain. Besides its modification status, the GlnK protein changes its intracellular localization in response to changes of the cellular nitrogen supply. While it is present in the cytoplasm during nitrogen starvation, the GlnK protein is sequestered to the cytoplasmic membrane in response to an ammonium pulse following a nitrogen starvation period. About 2- 5% of the GlnK pool is located at the cytoplasmic membrane after ammonium addition. GlnK binding to the cytoplasmic membrane depends on the ammo- nium transporter AmtB, which is encoded in the same transcriptional unit as GlnK and GlnD, the amtB-glnK- glnD operon. In contrast, the structurally related methylammonium/ammonium permease AmtA does not bind GlnK. The membrane-bound GlnK protein is stable, most likely to inactivate AmtB-dependent ammonium transport in order to prevent a detrimental futile cycle under post-starvation ammonium-rich conditions, while the majority of GlnK is degraded within 2-4 min. Proteolysis in the transition period from nitrogen starvation to nitrogen-rich growth seems to be specific for GlnK; other proteins of the nitrogen metabolism, such as glutamine synthetase, or proteins unrelated to ammonium assimilation, such as enolase and ATP synthase subunit F 1 b , are stable under these conditions. Our analyses of differ- ent mutant strains have shown that at least three different proteases influence the degradation of GlnK, namely FtsH, the ClpCP and the ClpXP protease complex.

Trace conditioning is a form of associative learning that can be induced by presenting a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) following each other, but separated by a temporal gap. This gap distinguishes trace conditioning from classical delay conditioning, where the CS and US overlap. To bridge the temporal gap between both stimuli and to form an association between CS and US in trace conditioning, the brain must keep a neural representation of the CS after its termination—a stimulus trace. Behavioral and physiological studies on trace and delay conditioning revealed similarities between the two forms of learning, like similar memory decay and similar odor identity perception in invertebrates. On the other hand differences were reported also, like the requirement of distinct brain structures in vertebrates or disparities in molecular mechanisms in both vertebrates and invertebrates. For example, in commonly used vertebrate conditioning paradigms the hippocampus is necessary for trace but not for delay conditioning, and Drosophila delay conditioning requires the Rutabaga adenylyl cyclase (Rut-AC), which is dispensable in trace conditioning. It is still unknown how the brain encodes CS traces and how they are associated with a US in trace conditioning. Insects serve as powerful models to address the mechanisms underlying trace conditioning, due to their simple brain anatomy, behavioral accessibility and established methods of genetic interference. In this review we summarize the recent progress in insect trace conditioning on the behavioral and physiological level and emphasize similarities and differences compared to delay conditioning. Moreover, we examine proposed molecular and computational models and reassess different experimental approaches used for trace conditioning.

P(II)-type signal transduction proteins play a central role in nitrogen regulation in many bacteria. In response to the intracellular nitrogen status, these proteins are rendered in their function and interaction with other proteins by modification/demodification events, e.g. by phosphorylation or uridylylation. In this study, we show that GlnK, the only P(II)-type protein in Corynebacterium glutamicum, is adenylylated in response to nitrogen starvation and deadenylylated when the nitrogen supply improves again. Both processes depend on the GlnD protein. As shown by mutant analyses, the modifying activity of this enzyme is located in the N-terminal part of the enzyme, while demodification depends on its C-terminal domain. Besides its modification status, the GlnK protein changes its intracellular localization in response to changes of the cellular nitrogen supply. While it is present in the cytoplasm during nitrogen starvation, the GlnK protein is sequestered to the cytoplasmic membrane in response to an ammonium pulse following a nitrogen starvation period. About 2-5% of the GlnK pool is located at the cytoplasmic membrane after ammonium addition. GlnK binding to the cytoplasmic membrane depends on the ammonium transporter AmtB, which is encoded in the same transcriptional unit as GlnK and GlnD, the amtB-glnK-glnD operon. In contrast, the structurally related methylammonium/ammonium permease AmtA does not bind GlnK. The membrane-bound GlnK protein is stable, most likely to inactivate AmtB-dependent ammonium transport in order to prevent a detrimental futile cycle under post-starvation ammonium-rich conditions, while the majority of GlnK is degraded within 2-4 min. Proteolysis in the transition period from nitrogen starvation to nitrogen-rich growth seems to be specific for GlnK; other proteins of the nitrogen metabolism, such as glutamine synthetase, or proteins unrelated to ammonium assimilation, such as enolase and ATP synthase subunit F(1)beta, are stable under these conditions. Our analyses of different mutant strains have shown that at least three different proteases influence the degradation of GlnK, namely FtsH, the ClpCP and the ClpXP protease complex.

Background The influence of the membrane-bound AAA+ protease FtsH on membrane and cytoplasmic proteins of Corynebacterium glutamicum was investigated in this study. For the analysis of the membrane fraction, anion exchange chromatography was combined with SDS-PAGE, while the cytoplasmic protein fraction was studied by conventional two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Results In contrast to the situation in other bacteria, deletion of C. glutamicum ftsH has no significant effect on growth in standard minimal medium or response to heat or osmotic stress. On the proteome level, deletion of the ftsH gene resulted in a strong increase of ten cytoplasmic and membrane proteins, namely biotin carboxylase/biotin carboxyl carrier protein (accBC), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap), homocysteine methyltransferase (metE), malate synthase (aceB), isocitrate lyase (aceA), a conserved hypothetical protein (NCgl1985), succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA), succinate dehydrogenase B (sdhB), succinate dehydrogenase CD (sdhCD), and glutamate binding protein (gluB), while 38 cytoplasmic and membrane-associated proteins showed a decreased abundance. The decreasing amount of succinate dehydrogenase A (sdhA) in the cytoplasmic fraction of the ftsH mutant compared to the wild type and its increasing abundance in the membrane fraction indicates that FtsH might be involved in the cleavage of a membrane anchor of this membrane-associated protein and by this changes its localization. Conclusion The data obtained hint to an involvement of C. glutamicum FtsH protease mainly in regulation of energy and carbon metabolism, while the protease is not involved in stress response, as found in other bacteria.