Search

Background: Data are scant on the miss rate of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction if basal pressure in both biliary and pancreatic sphincter segments is not measured during manometry. Methods: Motility tracings with basal pressure measurements of both sphincter segments were retrospectively analyzed. Basal sphincter pressure greater than 40 mm Hg was considered abnormal in either sphincter segment. Results: The study population consisted of 73 subjects (64 women, 9 men; age 45.3 +/- 1.6 yr). The basal pressures in the 2 sphincter segments were highly discordant (correlation coefficient = 0.2, p = 0.04). Basal pressures were normal in both segments in 19%, abnormal in both segments in 40%, and abnormal in 1 segment but normal in the other in 41%. The negative predictive value of normal biliary sphincter pressure in excluding sphincter dysfunction was 0.42; when the pancreatic sphincter pressure was normal, the negative predictive value was 0.58. The incidence of pancreatitis with dual duct manometry was comparable to the institutional experience with all sphincter studies. Conclusions: Although the clinical relevance of individually elevated sphincter pressures remains uncertain, there is significant discordance of basal pressures between the biliary and pancreatic sphincter segments. If only the biliary sphincter pressure were to be measured, one fourth of abnormal sphincter pressures would be missed. Therefore, if the first sphincter segment has a normal basal pressure, the other segment should also be evaluated. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:183-6.)

Background: Video enteroscopy provides high-quality diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities in the proximal small bowel. Enteroclysis remains an essential diagnostic technique in the distal small bowel. We report our experience with the combination of these techniques. Methods: Seventy-one patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (group A, 54 patients) or abnormal radiologic studies (group B, 17 patients) were evaluated with enteroscopy. Enteroclysis via a tube inserted on withdrawal of the enteroscope was performed in all patients with nondiagnostic enteroscopy. Results: Enteroscopy identified bleeding sites in 29 of 54 (54%) group A patients (12 angiodysplasia, 10 ulcers, 7 gastric erosions, 1 vessel, 1 aortoenteric fistula), and lesions in 11 of 17 (65%) group B patients (7 ulcers, 3 benign strictures, 2 radiation enteritis, 1 mass). In group A, 13 (24%) patients had findings detectable by standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Enteroclysis identified masses in 2 of 24 (8%) group A patients, and lesions in 5 of 10 (50%) group B patients (3 strictures, 1 mass, 1 large diverticulum). No complications occurred. Conclusions: The combination of enteroscopy and enteroclysis is safe and offers quality small bowel examinations in more comfortable and convenient single diagnostic sittings. This combination detected bleeding sources in 57% and lesions in 70% of patients. Though enteroclysis identified bleeding sources in only 8% of patients, this study excluded lesions other than angiodysplasia. (Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:163-7.)

Background: Endoscopic therapy of biliary tract leaks was uncommon before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endoscopic drainage by endoscopic sphincterotomy or stent placement. Various endoscopic therapeutic modalities and long-term follow-up of this problem were studied. Methods: Members of the Midwest Pancreaticobiliary Group reviewed all patients referred for endoscopic therapy of biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 1990 to 1994. Long-term follow-up was by direct patient contact. Results: Fifty patients were referred for endoscopic therapy of biliary leaks. Abdominal pain was present in 94%. The mean time from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to referral was 6.9 days. Therapy consisted of sphincterotomy only in 6 patients, stent only in 13, and sphincterotomy with stent in 31. Biliary leaks were healed in 44 patients at a mean of 5.4 weeks. A second or third endoscopic procedure was necessary to achieve healing in five patients. Two stent-related complications were noted. Percutaneous or surgical drainage of biliary fluid collections was required in 16 patients. The mean hospital stay for treatment of the leak was 11.1 days after endoscopic therapy. On follow-up (mean 17.5 months), all patients were well except two with mild abdominal discomfort. Conclusions: Endoscopic sphincterotomy, stent placement, or sphincterotomy with stent are effective in healing biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Despite prolonged treatment for the leak, patients did well on long-term follow-up. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:261-6.)

The data presented in the paper demonstrate that in BHK cells infected with Sindbis virus virtually all the 42S mRNA not in nucleocapsid is associated with free polyribosomes, whereas the 26S mRNA is distributed between free and membrane-bound polyribosomes. We suggest that the 26S RNA polyribosomes are bound to the membranes through the nascent chains of the B1 protein and that a large percentage of 26S RNA polyribosomes free in the cytoplasm may be due to the small amount of rough endoplasmic reticulum in BHK cells. In addition, we found that intracellular nucleocapsid is in the nonmembrane fraction of the cytoplasm of infected cells.