Search

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Although generic medicinal products are required to have the same qualitative and quantitative composition of the active substance as their reference originator product, patients and health care professionals express concerns about their interchangeability and safety. Therefore, the present study investigated the antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention of original and generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam against Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: Two generic formulations of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam were tested against their respective originator products. Susceptibility testing was performed with twenty-one clinical isolates of S. aureus and ATCC-29213 using broth microdilution. Time kill curves (TKC) were performed with ATCC-29213 at drug concentrations above and below the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Mutation prevention concentration was determined for each drug formulation against ATCC-29213. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Mutant colonies from mutation prevention concentration (MPC) experiments were genotypically tested by sequence analysis. Results: MIC ratios between contiguous originator and generic drugs were similar for each isolate. No visual differences were observed in TKCs between originator and generic substances. The MPC did not differ between different formulations of the same substance. Although sequence analysis of mutant colonies revealed genomic differences compared with the original ATCC-29213, no differences in mutation frequencies were observed between clinical isolates and ATCC-29213 treated with originator or generic substances. Conclusions: Similar antimicrobial activity and pathogen mutation prevention was observed between contiguous substances. These results support the interchangeability of generic and originator drug formulations with the same active ingredient.

Background APN01 is a soluble recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2), a key player in the renin–aldosterone–angiotensin system (RAAS). In clinical studies, APN01 was administered intravenously only, so far. The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05065645) was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of inhaled APN01. Methods This was a phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. Inhalation was conducted via a nebuliser over 15 min in three single ascending dose (SAD) cohorts (n=24) and two multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts (n=16: every 12 h for 7 days). Doses in the SAD cohort were 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg·mL−1; doses in the MAD cohort were 2.5 and 5 mg·mL−1. Safety (including adverse events (AEs), laboratory findings and lung function results), PK and PD data were assessed. Results In the SAD and MAD cohorts, treatment-related AEs were slightly more frequent in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. AEs were mild to moderate, with no dose-limiting toxicities. No clinically relevant changes in lung function and laboratory results were observed. The mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) values after single and multiple doses of 5 mg·mL−1 APN01 were 1.88 and 6.61 ng·mL−1, respectively. Among the PD variables, significance was found for ACE2 and angiotensin 1–5. Conclusions The application of aerosolised APN01 is safe and well tolerated after single and multiple doses. By achieving a high local concentration in the lungs and low systemic bioavailability, inhaled rhACE2 may present a therapeutic option in ACE2-related diseases.

Abstract Background Patients with cancer are at high risk for severe courses of COVID-19. Based on (pre-)clinical data suggesting a potential protective effect due to the immunomodulating properties of azithromycin, we have initiated a prospective randomized trial. Methods This randomized, single-center, single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial included adult patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment. Patients were 1:1 randomized to oral azithromycin (1500 mg once weekly for 8 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of SARS-CoV-2 infections 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Results In total, 523 patients were screened, 68 patients were randomized, and 63 patients received at least one dose of the study drug. Due to low acceptance and a lack of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the study cohort, the study was prematurely closed. With no reported grade III–IV possibly treatment-related adverse events, azithromycin was generally well tolerated. Overall survival (OS) rates after 12 months were 83.5% and 70.3% in the azithromycin and placebo group, respectively (p = 0.37). Non-SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 4/32 (12.5%) in the azithromycin and 3/31 (9.7%) in the placebo group (p = 1). No emergence of azithromycin-resistant S. aureus strains could be observed. According to treatment group, longitudinal alterations in systemic inflammatory parameters were detected for neutrophil/lymphocyte and leukocyte/lymphocyte ratios. Conclusion Although efficacy could not be assessed due to premature closure and low incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, azithromycin was associated with a favorable side effect profile in patients with cancer. As other prophylactic treatments are limited, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination remains a high priority in oncological patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number and date (dd/mm/yyyy): NCT04369365, 30/04/2020.

IMPORTANCE:. Previous findings suggest that bacterial coinfections are less common in ICU patients with COVID-19 than with influenza, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES:. This study aimed to compare the rate of early bacterial coinfections in ICU patients with COVID-19 or influenza. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:. Retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. We included patients admitted to ICUs of a single academic center with COVID-19 or influenza (January 2015 to April 2022). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:. The primary outcome was early bacterial coinfection (i.e., positive blood or respiratory culture within 2 d of ICU admission) in the propensity score matched cohort. Key secondary outcomes included frequency of early microbiological testing, antibiotic use, and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS:. Out of 289 patients with COVID-19 and 39 patients with influenza, 117 (n = 78 vs 39) were included in the matched analysis. In the matched cohort, the rate of early bacterial coinfections was similar between COVID-19 and influenza (18/78 [23%] vs 8/39 [21%]; odds ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.42–3.45; p = 0.82). The frequency of early microbiological testing and antibiotic use was similar between the two groups. Within the overall COVID-19 group, early bacterial coinfections were associated with a statistically significant increase in 30-day all-cause mortality (21/68 [30.9%] vs 40/221 [18.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01–3.32). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:. Our data suggest similar rates of early bacterial coinfections in ICU patients with COVID-19 and influenza. In addition, early bacterial coinfections were significantly associated with an increased 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Abstract Background In patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), Staphylococcus aureus frequently colonizes lesions and is hypothesized to be linked to disease severity and progression. Treatments that reduce S. aureus colonization without significantly affecting the skin commensal microbiota are needed. Methods and findings In this study, we tested ATx201 (niclosamide), a small molecule, on its efficacy to reduce S. aureus and propensity to evolve resistance in vitro. Various cutaneous formulations were then tested in a superficial skin infection model. Finally, a Phase 2 randomized, double‐blind and placebo‐controlled trial was performed to investigate the impact of ATx201 OINTMENT 2% on S. aureus colonization and skin microbiome composition in patients with mild‐to‐severe AD (EudraCT:2016‐003501‐33). ATx201 has a narrow minimal inhibitory concentration distribution (.125–.5 μg/ml) consistent with its mode of action – targeting the proton motive force effectively stopping cell growth. In murine models, ATx201 can effectively treat superficial skin infections of methicillin‐resistant S. aureus. In a Phase 2 trial in patients with mild‐to‐severe AD (N = 36), twice‐daily treatment with ATx201 OINTMENT 2% effectively reduces S. aureus colonization in quantitative colony forming unit (CFU) analysis (primary endpoint: 94.4% active vs. 38.9% vehicle success rate, p = .0016) and increases the Shannon diversity of the skin microbiome at day 7 significantly compared to vehicle. Conclusion These results suggest that ATx201 could become a new treatment modality as a decolonizing agent.

COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a life-threatening fungal infection that mainly affects critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical outcomes of putative CAPA in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This retrospective observational cohort study included 181 cases from 5 ICUs at Vienna General Hospital between January 2020 and April 2022. Patients were diagnosed with putative CAPA according to the AspICU classification, which included a positive Aspergillus culture in a bronchoalveolar lavage sample, compatible signs and symptoms, and abnormal medical imaging. The primary outcome was adjusted 60-day all-cause mortality from ICU admission in patients with vs. without putative CAPA. Secondary outcomes included time from ICU admission to CAPA diagnosis and pathogen prevalence and distribution. Putative CAPA was identified in 35 (19.3%) of 181 COVID-19 patients. The mean time to diagnosis was 9 days. Death at 60 days occurred in 18 of 35 (51.4%) patients with CAPA and in 43 of 146 (29.5%) patients without CAPA (adjusted HR (95%CI) = 2.15 (1.20–3.86, p = 0.002). The most frequently isolated Aspergillus species was Aspergillus fumigatus. The prevalence of putative pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill COVID-19 patients was high and was associated with significantly higher mortality.

In antimicrobial drug development, in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing is conducted in standard growth media, such as Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB). These growth media provide optimal bacterial growth, but do not consider certain host factors that would be necessary to mimic the in vivo bacterial environment in the human body. The present review aimed to include relevant data published between 1986 and 2019. A database search (PubMed) was done with text keywords, such as “MIC” (minimal inhibitory concentration), “TKC” (time kill curve), “blood”, “body fluid”, “PD” (pharmacodynamic), and “in vitro”, and 53 papers were ultimately selected. Additionally, a literature search for physiologic characteristics of body fluids was conducted. This review gives an excerpt of the complexity of human compartments with their physiologic composition. Furthermore, we present an update of currently available in vitro models operated either with adapted growth media or body fluids themselves. Moreover, the feasibility of testing the activity of antimicrobials in such settings is discussed, and pro and cons for standard practice methods are given. The impact on bacterial killing varies between individual adapted microbiological media, as well as direct pharmacodynamic simulations in body fluids, between bacterial strains, antimicrobial agents, and the compositions of the adjuvants or the biological fluid itself.