Search

This phase I/II study assessed the combination of brentuximab vedotin (BV) with ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (ICE) as a second-line therapy in refractory/relapsed (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients. Phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BV (10 patients) and phase II evaluated the rate of complete metabolic response (CMR) after 2 cycles of BV-ICE (42 patients). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during phase I recommending BV 1.8 mg/kg for phase II. Twenty-six patients (61.9%) achieved CMR after 2 cycles of BV-ICE and 37 patients (88%) were transplanted. With a median follow-up of 38 months, the 3-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rate were 64.3% and 100%, respectively. Hematological toxicities (81%) and infections (21%) were the most frequent adverse event encountered BV-ICE regimen is feasible with manageable toxicities and could be an alternative to other salvage treatments. : ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686346.

Purpose: To investigate the value of the metabolic tumor response assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), compared with clinicobiologic markers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Experimental Design: Fifty consecutive women with TNBC and an indication for NAC were prospectively included. Different pretreatment clinical, biologic, and pathologic biomarkers, including SBR grade, the Ki-67 proliferation index, androgen receptor expression, EGF receptor (EGFR), and cytokeratin 5/6 staining, were assessed. Tumor glucose metabolism at baseline and its change after the first cycle of NAC (ΔSUVmax) were assessed using FDG-PET.Results: The pCR rate was 42%. High Ki-67 proliferation index (P = 0.016), negative EGFR status (P = 0.042), and high ΔSUVmax (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with pCR. In multivariate logistic regression, both negative EGFR status (OR, 6.4; P = 0.043) and high ΔSUVmax (OR, 7.1; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of pCR. Using a threshold at −50%, tumor ΔSUVmax predicted pCR with a negative, a positive predictive value, and an accuracy of 79%, 70%, and 75%, respectively. Combining a low ΔSUVmax and positive EGFR status could predict non-pCR with an accuracy of 92%.Conclusions: It is important to define the chemosensitivity of TNBC to NAC early. Combining EGFR status and the metabolic response assessed with FDG-PET can help the physician to early predict the probability of achieving pCR or not. Given these results, the interest of response-guided tailoring of the chemotherapy might be tested in multicenter trials. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5460–8. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1: Graphical display of changes in primary tumor SUVmax between baseline and interim 18F-FDG PET exams.

PURPOSE The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747 ) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results. METHODS Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2– and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. RESULTS In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2–/PET4–, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4– and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4– patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2–/PET4– patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively. CONCLUSION The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis.

Aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has variable outcomes. Current prognostic tools use factors for risk stratification that inadequately identify patients at high risk of refractory disease or relapse before initial treatment. A model associating 2 risk factors, total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) >220 cm3 (determined by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography) and performance status (PS) ≥2, identified as prognostic in 301 older patients in the REMARC trial (#NCT01122472), was validated in 2174 patients of all ages treated in 2 clinical trials, PETAL (Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas; N = 510) and GOYA (N = 1315), and in real-world clinics (N = 349) across Europe and the United States. Three risk categories, low (no factors), intermediate (1 risk factor), and high (2 risk factors), significantly discriminated outcome in most of the series. Patients with 2 risk factors had worse outcomes than patients with no risk factors in the PETAL, GOYA, and real-world series. Patients with intermediate risk also had significantly worse outcomes than patients with no risk factors. The TMTV/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-PS combination outperformed the International Prognostic Index with a positive C-index for progression-free survival and overall survival in most series. The combination of high TMTV > 220 cm3 and ECOG-PS ≥ 2 is a simple clinical model to identify aggressive LBCL risk categories before treatment. This combination addresses the unmet need to better predict before treatment initiation for aggressive LBCL the patients likely to benefit the most or not at all from therapy.

Rituximab plus polychemotherapy is the standard of care in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). GAINED, a randomized phase 3 trial, compared obinutuzumab to rituximab. Transplant-eligible patients (18-60 years) with an untreated age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score ≥1 DLBCL were randomized (1:1) between obinutuzumab or rituximab and stratified by aaIPI (1; 2-3) and chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone plus vindesine, bleomycin [ACVBP] or vincristine [CHOP]). Consolidation treatment was determined according to response to interim positron emission tomography (PET). Responders after cycle 2 and 4 (PET2−/PET4−) received immunochemotherapy. Responders after only cycle 4 (PET2+/4−) received transplantation. The primary objective was an 8% improvement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 80% power; α risk, 2.5%; 1-sided) in 2-year event-free survival (EFS) in the obinutuzumab arm. From September 2012, 670 patients were enrolled (obinutuzumab, n = 336; rituximab, n = 334). A total of 383 (57.2%) were aaIPI 2-3, 339 (50.6%) received CHOP. Median follow-up was 38.7 months. The 2-year EFS was similar in both groups (59.8% vs 56.6%; P = .123; HR = 0.88). The 2-year PFS in the whole cohort was 83.1% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 85.8%). PET2−/4− and PET2+/4− had similar 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): 89.9% vs 83.9% and 94.8% vs 92.8%. The 2-year PFS and OS for PET4+ patients were 62% and 83.1%. Grade 3-5 infections were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm (21% vs 12%). Obinutuzumab is not superior to rituximab in aaIPI ≥1 DLBCL transplant-eligible patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01659099.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as an option for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas that have failed 2 lines of therapy. Failures usually occur early after infusion. The purpose of our study was to identify factors that may predict failure, particularly early progression (EP), within the first month after infusion. Characteristics of 116 patients were analyzed at the time of decision (TD) to use commercial CAR (axicabtagene ciloleucel, n = 49; tisagenlecleucel n = 67) and at the time of treatment (TT), together with total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) at TT. With a median follow-up of 8.2 months, 55 patients failed treatment; 27 (49%) were early progressors. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 47.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.0-58.6) and 67.0% (95% CI, 57-79), respectively. Univariate analyses for PFS and OS identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥2, stage III/IV disease, extranodal (EN) sites ≥2, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), increased C-reactive protein (CRP), high International Prognostic Index at TD and at TT, as well as increased CRP, bulky mass, and high TMTV at TT, as risk factors. Multivariate analyses for PFS, EP, and OS identified elevated LDH and EN sites ≥2 at TD and the same predictors at TT (ie, increased CRP, EN sites ≥2, and TMTV >80 mL). In summary, risk factors identified for early progression at TD and at TT were EN involvement (≥2 sites) and lymphoma burden (LDH, TMTV).

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare type of aggressive lymphoma typically affecting young female patients. The first-line standard of care remains debated. We performed a large multicenter retrospective study in 25 centers in France and Belgium to describe PMBL patient outcomes after first-line treatment in real-life settings. A total of 313 patients were enrolled and received rituximab (R) plus ACVBP (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone) (n = 180) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) delivered every 14 days (R-CHOP14, n = 76) or 21 days (R-CHOP21, n = 57) and consolidation strategies in modalities that varied according to time and institution, mainly guided by positron emission tomography. Consolidation autologous stem cell transplantation was performed for 46 (25.6%), 24 (31.6%), and 1 (1.8%) patient in the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 groups, respectively (P < .001); only 17 (5.4%) patients received mediastinal radiotherapy. The end-of-treatment complete metabolic response rates were 86.3%, 86.8%, and 76.6% (P = .23) in the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 groups. The median follow-up was 44 months, and the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 three-year progression-free survival probabilities were 89.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.8-94.2), 89.4% (95% CI, 82.7-96.6), and 74.7% (95% CI, 64-87.1) (P = .018). A baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) ≥360 cm3 was associated with a lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.05-4.53). Excess febrile neutropenia (24.4% vs 5.3% vs 5.3%; P < .001) and mucositis (22.8% vs 3.9% vs 1.8%; P < .001) were observed with R-ACVBP compared with the R-CHOP regimens. Patients with PMBL treated with dose-dense immunochemotherapy without radiotherapy have excellent outcomes. R-ACVBP acute toxicity was higher than that of R-CHOP14. Our data confirmed the prognostic importance of baseline TMTV.

The aims of this study were to assess the dependence of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on age and gender and to produce reference data for the interpretation of 51Cr-EDTA GFR measurements in adults. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 120 live kidney donors (75 females, 45 males). GFR was evaluated from 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance using blood samples taken at 3, 4 and 5 hours. The slope-intercept GFR was corrected for body surface area using the Dubois & Dubois and for the fast exponential using the Brochner-Mortensen equation. Scatter plot of DFG against age in live kidney donors was plotted and the 98% range limits have been defined. RESULTS The median GFR obtained for kidney donors was 88 mL/min/1.73 m2 [68-130]. No significant difference with gender was found. 51Cr-EDTA clearance was strongly correlated with patient age (r = - 0.62, P

International audience; Purpose Lymphoma lesion detection and segmentation on whole-body FDG-PET/CT are a challenging task because of the diversity of involved nodes, organs or physiological uptakes. We sought to investigate the performances of a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically segment total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) in large datasets of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods The dataset contained pre-therapy FDG-PET/CT from 733 DLBCL patients of 2 prospective LYmphoma Study Association (LYSA) trials. The first cohort (n = 639) was used for training using a 5-fold cross validation scheme. The second cohort (n = 94) was used for external validation of TMTV predictions. Ground truth masks were manually obtained after a 41% SUVmax adaptive thresholding of lymphoma lesions. A 3D U-net architecture with 2 input channels for PET and CT was trained on patches randomly sampled within PET/CTs with a summed cross entropy and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) loss. Segmentation performance was assessed by the DSC and Jaccard coefficients. Finally, TMTV predictions were validated on the second independent cohort. Results Mean DSC and Jaccard coefficients (± standard deviation) in the validations set were 0.73 ± 0.20 and 0.68 ± 0.21, respectively. An underestimation of mean TMTV by − 12 mL (2.8%) ± 263 was found in the validation sets of the first cohort (P = 0.27). In the second cohort, an underestimation of mean TMTV by − 116 mL (20.8%) ± 425 was statistically significant (P = 0.01). Conclusion Our CNN is a promising tool for automatic detection and segmentation of lymphoma lesions, despite slight underestimation of TMTV. The fully automatic and open-source features of this CNN will allow to increase both dissemination in routine practice and reproducibility of TMTV assessment in lymphoma patients.

Background: The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study (NCT01142778) demonstrated that early PET assessment identified HER2-positive breast cancer patients who responded poorly to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab. Adding neoadjuvant bevacizumab for PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (43.8% vs 24.0%). We investigated long-term study outcomes. Methods: Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with ≥70% change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responders). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax

International audience

Background In contrast to the high cure rates in young patients (pts) treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) prognosis is poor in elderly pts, and very few data exist for pts considered too frail to receive standard-dose chemotherapy. In those patients, limited therapeutic options are available. Among the new immune-oncology drugs, Nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, has demonstrated high response rate and very good tolerance, and is now approved in relapse and refractory (R/R) cHL. However, data on its use in the frontline setting are scarce. Material and methods We designed a prospective, open-label, multi-centric phase II study, to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone, or in combination with vinblastine in naive pts aged 61 years and older, with cHL and coexisting medical conditions. Pts were eligible if they had a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) score of 6 or more. Treatment consisted in an induction phase of 6 nivolumab injections, delivered at a flat dose of 240 mg every 14 days. Early assessment was done at 12 weeks by PET-CT and CT-scan. Pts who achieved complete metabolic response (CMR) at early assessment completed treatment with nivolumab monotherapy for 18 additional cycles (consolidation phase). Pts who obtained partial metabolic response (PMR) or non metabolic response (NMR, stable disease) received a combination of 18 cycles of nivolumab plus vinblastine, administered intravenously. The primary objective of the study was to assess the CMR rate based on central review at the end of treatment (EOT). Results From August 30th, 2018 to April 28 th, 2020, 64 pts were included in 31 centers, which composed the full analysis set (FAS), used for safety evaluation. Among these 64 pts, 56 pts were fully evaluable and constituted the efficacy set (ES) used for the efficacy analysis (8 pts progressed early or were not assessed by PET-CT). The median age at inclusion in the ES was 75 years [range: 62-91]. Patients had a median CIRS-G score of 10 [range: 6-18] at baseline, and a median G8 score of 12.5 [range: 6-17]. Seventy-three percent of pts had a stage III-IV disease and 42.9% of pts had B symptoms. At EOT, 16 pts (28.6%) achieved CMR according to central PET-CT review. Ten pts (17.9%) achieved PMR, 10 pts were in NMR (17.9%) and progressive metabolic disease was observed in 17 pts (30.4%). Three pts were not evaluated. The overall response rate at end of induction was 51.9%, (9 CMR and 18 PMR). 23 pts received a consolidation with nivolumab and vinblastine. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median PFS was 9.8 months [95% CI: 4.2;12]. 15/64 pts of the FAS died during treatment (23.4%): 6 pts from lymphoma, 2 pts from toxicity of study treatment and 2 pts from concurrent illness. One patient died from toxicity of additional treatment after progression, and 4 pts from other causes. The 2-year overall survival was 76.7% [95% CI: 59.6;87.3]. 49/64 pts (76.6%) experienced at least one AE, among which 32 pts experienced grade 3-4 AEs. The 3 more frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (8 pts), sepsis (7 pts) and respiratory tract infection (5 pts). Adverse events were related to nivolumab in 36 pts and led to treatment discontinuation in 19 pts (29.7%). Adverse events of special interest i.e., immune-related AEs, were recorded in 22 pts, including 3 pneumonitis, 1 myocarditis, 1 encephalitis and 1 colitis. Among the 64 pts of the FAS, 34% of pts completed the treatment. The median number of cycles administered was 7 [range: 1-24] for nivolumab and 17 [range: 1-18] for vinblastine. Conclusion The NIVINIHO study is the first study to assess the efficacy and safety of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for first line therapy in elderly, frail patients with cHL. The results suggest that in this setting, a nivolumab-based therapy is active in a subset of pts. Further studies and biological analysis are planned to determine which patients may benefit from this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lazarovici: Mundipharma: Other: Travel grant. Bouabdallah: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses. Morschhauser: Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi: Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Jansen: Research Funding. Feugier: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sibon: iQone: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ribrag: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab. Presently labelled for relapse and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies

Introduction: Older classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients are characterized by a significant reduced survival as compared to younger patients. In relapsed and refractory HL, prospective and retrospective studies showed that bendamustine monotherapy provided interesting efficacy with 30% of complete response with an acceptable toxicity profile. We developed the PVAB (Prednisone, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Bendamustine) regimen in first line therapy to improve prognosis of older HL with advanced stage. Methods: In this prospective phase II, we recruited newly diagnosed classical HL patients age of 61 years or older with an advanced stage (Ann Arbor stage III, IV, IIB with risk factors). Inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0-2; adequate cardio-pulmonary function with LVEF ≥ 50%; adequate renal function with creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min; HIV negative; For patients aged 70 years old and more, a Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) ≥ 17. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of prednisone (40mg/m 2 D1-5), vinblastine (6mg/m 2, D1), doxorubicin (40mg/m 2, D1) and bendamustine (120mg/m 2, D1) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the complete metabolic response (CMR) rate according to local review after 6 cycles of study treatment or at premature treatment discontinuation according to Lugano Classification. We presented the final analysis of the study with a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 0.5-63.8), with prognostic analyses for progression free survival (PFS) measured from the date of inclusion to the date of progression, relapse or death from any cause. Prognostic factors included baseline clinical and biological characteristics, geriatric assessments and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters especially baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV). Optimal thresholds for some parameters were calculated using X-Tile approach. Results: Between July 2015 and July 2018, 89 patients were included in 34 LYSA centers. The median age was 68 years (range, 61-88) with 35 patients ≥70 years old (39%). The main histological subtype was nodular sclerosis cHL (n=56, 63%) with 26 EBV associated cases (LMP1 staining). Ann Arbor stages were as follows: II (n=3, 3%), III (n=30, 34%), IV (n=56, 63%). B symptoms were present in 57% of patients; 70 patients (80%) had IPS≥3. The median of CIRS-G score was 3 (range, 0-12). Seventy-eight patients (88%) completed the 6 cycles of PVAB. Update results for toxicity showed that 28 patients (32%) presented at least one serious adverse event (SAE) in particular infections (n=13, 15%), blood (n=11, 12%) and cardiac disorders (n=4, 4.5%). The CMR rate according to local review corresponding to the primary endpoint of the study was 77.5% (95%CI, 67-86) with 69 patients in CMR. After central review of 79 available PET/CT images, the CMR rate was 78.5%. Thirty-one patients relapsed or progressed (35%). The 4-year PFS rate was 50% (95%CI, 39-61). For the 69 patients achieving CMR, the 4-year disease free survival (DFS) rate was 62.8% (95%CI, 49-74). Twenty-four patients (27%) died: 11 cHL (46%), 4 treatment toxicity (17%), 6 second cancers (25%), 3 other causes after treatment (infection, cardiac insufficiency, pulmonary embolism, 12%). The 4-year overall survival rate was 69% (95%CI, 57-79). In univariate analysis, altered ECOG PS, Ann Arbor stage IV, bulky disease (>7cm), B-symptoms, extra-nodal involvement (>1), bone or medullar involvement, liver involvement, albumin (≤30g/l), hemoglobin level (88mg/l), TMTV (>450ml) and number of medications non-related to HL (>5) were associated with PFS. In multivariate analysis, liver involvement (HR: 3.79; 95%CI,1.71-8.43; P=0.001), lymphopenia (HR: 3.04; 95%CI,1.54-6.01; P=0.001), CRP (HR: 3.37; 95%CI, 1.69-6.69; P=0.0005) and co-medications (HR: 2.85; 95%CI,1.44-5.66; P=0.003) were independently associated with PFS. Conclusions: PVAB regimen provided high CMR (77.5%) with acceptable toxicity for advanced stage cHL patient over 60 years. The 4-year PFS and OS rates were 50% and 69% respectively, these survival endpoints were influenced by not related-lymphoma events. Prognostic analyses showed that specific involved site (liver), biological parameters (lymphocyte count and CRP) and patient's comorbidity (co-medications) influenced independently PFS. Disclosures Ghesquieres: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Mundipharma Research Limited: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jaccard: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Laribi: Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding. Morschhauser: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenenca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brice: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Bendamustine is off-label drug use in Hodgkin lymphoma

Background: The AHL2011 study demonstrated that a PET-driven strategy allows to deescalate treatment to 4 x ABVD in PET negative patients after 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP (BEACOPPesc) without loss of tumor control in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) compared to a non PET-monitored treatment delivering 6 x BEACOPPesc (Casasnovas RO et al, Lancet Oncol 2019). The interim PET results after 2 (PET2) and 4 (PET4) cycles of chemotherapy were found to influence patients PFS and OS independently of IPS. To further refine the patients outcome prediction we evaluate the prognostic value of baseline Total Metabolic Tumor Volume (TMTV) and tumor dissemination (SDmax) in Ann Arbor stage III-IV patients included in the AHL2011 trial. Patients and methods: 634 patients enrolled in the AHL2011 trial with stage Ann Arbor III or IV were included in the study. According to the AHL2011 trial, patients were randomized in a standard arm (6 x BEACOPPesc) or a PET-driven arm (2 x BEACOPPesc and 4 x ABVD in negative PET2 patients or 4 x BEACOPPesc in positive PET2 patients). For each patient, a semi automatic tumor segmentation was retrospectively performed in baseline PET to calculate TMTV using the 41% of SUVmax threshold and compute the maximum distance between the delineated lesions normalized by body surface area (SDmax). Optimal thresholds for TMTV and SDmax were calculated using X-Tile and ROC curve approaches in a randomly assigned training (n=317) and validation sets (n=317). The per protocol PET2 and PET4 responses were analyzed using the modified Deauville criteria (positive if residual uptake >140% background liver). Multivariate analysis included treatment arm, TMTV, SDmax, international prognosis score (IPS), PET2, and PET4 as covariates. The median follow-up was 5.6y. Results : Median TMTV and SDmax were 215 ml and 0.221 m-1 in the whole population and similar in both randomized arms and in the training and validation sets. Optimal cutoffs were 220ml for TMTV (312 patients [49%] had High TMTV) and 0.330 m-1 for SDmax (149 patients [24%] had High SDmax) and similar in the training and validation sets. 5-year PFS for patients with TMTV>220ml was 84.1% vs 90.2% in low TMTV patients (p=0.02) in the whole population (in the training set: 83% vs 89%, p=0.088 ; in the validation set : 86% vs 92% p=0.11). 5-year PFS was significantly lower in patients with SDmax>0.333 m-1 (78.8% vs 89.7%; HR=2.15 [95%CI: 1.38-3.35], p=0.0005) in the whole population (in the training set: 77% vs 89%; p=0.0037); in the validation set: 81% vs 91; p=0.046). The combination of TMTV and SDmax allows to identify two subgroups of patients, those having both low TMTV and low SDmax (n= 281; 44%) and those having high TMTV and/or SDmax (5-year PFS: 92% vs 83.4%; HR=2.24 [95%CI: 1.39-3.62], p=0.0007) (figure 1). In multivariate analysis, high TMTV (p=0.034), high SDmax (p=0.0002), PET2 (p=0.02) and PET4 (p Conclusion: Tumor burden (TMTV) and dissemination (SDmax) assessed on baseline 18FDG PET allow to predict, independently of early reponse to treatment, the outcome of patients with advanced HL. These two parameters overcome the prognosis value of IPS and could be included into new prognostic scores to tailor personalized therapy in advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. Figure 1 : PFS according to TMTV and SDmax in stage III-IV HL patients enrolled in the AHL2011 study Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brice: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Ghesquieres: Janssen: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stamatoullas-Bastard: Takeda: Consultancy. André: AbbVie: Other: Travel/accomodation/expenses; Roche: Other: Travel/accomodation/expenses, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel/accomodation/expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rossi: ROCHE: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria; ABBVIE: Honoraria. Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction: Primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL) is clinically and biologically distinct from the other subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), typically affecting young female patients (pts) with a bulky mediastinal mass. Standard treatment (TRT) is a combination of anti-CD20 antibody (Ab) and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We aimed to compare patients' outcomes after CHOP delivered every 21 days (CHOP21) or 14 days (CHOP14) or ACVBP combined with anti-CD20 Ab in real life. Methods: All Pts treated in LYSA centers were eligible in this retrospective analysis. Inclusion criteria were as follow: age ≥18 years (yrs), newly diagnosed PMBL, TRT with CHOP or ACVBP plus anti-CD20 Ab between 2006 and 2017, and patient non-opposition statement. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were: overall survival (OS), response rate (Lugano 2014) and total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV). Results: 313 pts were enrolled from 25 LYSA centers in France and Belgium. In all, median age at diagnosis was 32 (18-88) yrs. Majority of pts were female pts (60.7%) and presented at diagnosis with a good performance status (0-1: 81.8%), stage I-II (57.5%), elevated LDH (85%), Bulk>10cm (58.5%) and low/low-intermediate aaIPI 0-1 (56.7%). Pts in the CHOP21 (n=57) group were older (median 40 yrs, vs 33 vs 29.5, p Complete metabolic response rates at end of TRT were comparable between CHOP21, CHOP14 and ACVBP groups: 81.1%, 90.9%, and 85.5%, respectively (p=0.46). 37 (11.8%) pts progressed including 32 (10.2%) who displayed primary refractory disease and 6 (16.2%) pts who relapsed after consolidation ASCT. CNS relapse occurred in 9 (2.9%) pts. Median time between ASCT and relapse was 3 (2-58) months. Patients received the following salvage TRTs: high dose chemotherapy (HDC: R-ICE/R-DHAOX-like) (n=30) followed by second-line consolidation ASCT (n=11/30) and post-ASCT mediastinal RT (n=5/11); salvage RT without chemotherapy (n=1); other regimens (R-CHOP, R-GEMOX) (n=3); none (n=3). 2-yrs second PFS (PFS2) rates in pts who had previously received CHOP21, CHOP14 and ACVBP were: 20.5% vs 62.5% vs 18.8% (p=0.43). Only HDC + ASCT strategy granted disease control (2-yrs PFS2: 32.3%). Median follow up was 44 (1-153) months and the CHOP21, CHOP14, ACVBP 5-yrs PFS and 5-yrs OS were: 74.7% (95%CI: 64-97.1%), 89.4% (82.7-96.6%), 89.4% (84.8-94.2%) (p=0.018, Figure A); and 81% (70-94.4%), 100% (100-100%), 92.4% (88.4-96.7%) (p=0.0036, Figure B), respectively. In a multivariate model including TRT group, consolidation ASCT and/or RT, aaIPI, Bulk>10cm and TMTV≥360cm3, CHOP14 was not associated with better PFS as compared to ACVBP and CHOP21 (p=0.1548). Baseline higher TMTV (≥ 360 cm3) was associated with lower PFS in multivariate analysis, independently of TRT (HR=0.41 [0.2-0.85], p=0.02). All grades TRT-related adverse events were similar between the groups, except for an excess of febrile neutropenia (5.3% vs 5.3% vs 24.4%, p Conclusion These results confirm the favorable outcome of PMBL pts treated with CHOP14 and ACVBP plus anti CD20 Ab. The toxicity of ACVBP was more pronounced and CHOP14 was associated with a better OS. Baseline TMTV≥360cm3 is a highly predictive factor of unfavorable outcome in PMBL pts, independently of TRT. We recommend R-CHOP14 as standard of care in PMBL. Figure Disclosures Camus: ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); PFIZER: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); AMGEN: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Decazes:Bayer: Other: travel, accomodations, expenses. Bernard:Janssen: Other: Travel and accommodation . Gandhi Laurent:Abbevie, Pfizer, Takeda, Roche: Other: Travel; Roche, Takeda, Iqone, Accord: Consultancy; Roche, Takeda, Accord: Honoraria. Laribi:amgen: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; takeda: Research Funding; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Houot:Gilead: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Tilly:BMS: Honoraria.

Background AHL2011 study (NCT01358747) demonstrated that PET negativity after 2 cycles of upfront BEACOPPescalated (BEA) allows to switch to 4 cycles of ABVD 84% of patients (pts) with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) leading to reduce immediate treatment toxicity without loss of tumor control (Casasnovas RO, Lancet Oncol 2019). We report an updated follow-up of the study with a focus on the late treatment-related adverse events including secondary primary malignancies (SPM) and unfertility. Methods In AHL2011 823 patients aged 18-60 with a newly diagnosed advanced HL defined by an Ann Arbor stage III, IV or IIB with M/T>0.33 or extranodal involvement were prospectively randomized between a standard arm (n=413) delivering 6 x BEA and a PET-driven arm (n=410) after 2 x BEA delivering 4 x ABVD in PET2- pts and 4 x BEA in PET2+ pts. In both arms PET performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. We aimed at excluding inferiority of the PET-driven arm of at least 10% compared to the standard arm which was achieved with the analysis on 10/2017. The data cutoff for the present analysis was 29 April 2019. A prospective fertility substudy for patients 24 IU/L twice during 5y follow-up when available, with estradiol < 50pg/ml, and low ovarian reserve (OR) by AMH < 0.16ng/ml. - In males, FSH serum levels and sperm analysis. Results With a 5.6 year median follow-up, 5y PFS and OS were similar in both randomization arms (PFS: 87.5% vs 86.7% ;HR 1.07, 95%CI 0.74-1.57; p=0.67; OS: 97.7% in both arms; HR=1.012, 95%CI 0.50-2.10; p=0.53). In the whole cohort full interim PET assessment predicted patients PFS (5y PFS = 92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR= 3.26 ;95%CI 18.3-5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR= 12.4 ;95%CI :7.31-19.51] in PET4+ pts respectively; p 5g (HR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14-0.96; p=0.04) but not to arms. In males, median baseline FSH levels were similar in both arms but 19 and 23% experienced severe oligospermia at baseline in standard (n=214) and PET-driven arms (n=210), respectively. Chemotherapy dramatically reduced sperm numeration in both arms but recovery occured more frequently in the PET-driven arm (severe oligospermia at 4-5 year: 50% vs 93%). A total of 84 patients (14.7%) reported pregnancies including 49 (17.2%) in the PET driven arm vs 35 (12.3%) in the standard arm (p=0.12) and required assisted reproductive technology treatment more frequently in the standard arm (23% vs 14%). Conclusions The prolonged follow-up confirms that the PET-driven strategy delivering 4 cycles of ABVD in PET negative patients after 2 cycles of BEA is non inferior compared to standard 6 cycles of BEA. PET4 provides additionnal prognostic information to PET2 and identifies patients with particularly poor prognosis. The PET-driven treatment allows to reduce significantly the risk of infertility in both men (recovery of oligospermia) and women (decreasing by 5 the risk of POI) and improves the chances of spontaneous pregnancy after completion of HL treatment. With the current follow-up the risk of SPM was low (2.7%) and similar in both arms. Disclosures Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brice:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Ghesquieres:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; CELGENE: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria. Stamatoulas Bastard:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Dupuis:Henri Mondor University Hospital Creteil France: Current Employment. Gac:Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Bouabdallah:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Genentech, Inc. Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. André:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium: Current Employment; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Karyopharm: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding. Meignan:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Demeestere:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; THERAMEX FERRING: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Dose-dense induction and up-front consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remain controversial issues when treating patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. GELA designed a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of either rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone (R-ACVBP) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP14) induction and a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven ASCT or standard immunochemotherapy (SIC) consolidation in age-adjusted international prognosis index 2 (aaIPI2)-aaIPI3 patients. PET was performed at baseline, after 2 (PET2) and 4 (PET4) induction cycles, and centrally assessed using international harmonization project (IHP) criteria. PET2-/PET4- patients were assigned SIC, PET2+/PET4- patients were assigned ASCT, and PET4+ patients were treated with the investigator's choice. The primary end-point was the 2007 international working group complete response (CR) rate after induction. Change in maximum standard uptake value (ΔSUVmax) after PET assessment was explored. Two hundred eleven patients were randomly assigned to R-ACVBP (n = 109) or R-CHOP14 (n = 102). PET4-/CR rates were 53%/47% with R-ACVBP and 41%/39% with R-CHOP14 (CR 95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-67% and 28%-54%, respectively; P = .076). Consolidation in the R-ACVBP and R-CHOP14 groups was SIC in 26% and 23% of patients and ASCT in 28% and 18% of patients, respectively. PET4 positivity was higher with R-CHOP14 vs R-ACVBP (54% vs 41%; P = .08), leading to more salvage therapy (37% vs 26%; P = .07) and lower event-free survival (EFS; 4-year EFS, 31% vs 43%; P 70% was associated with better outcome (4-year PFS, 84% vs 35%; 4-year OS, 91% vs 57%; P < .0001), whatever the consolidation. Superiority of R-ACVBP over R-CHOP14 was not established, as IHP criteria did not properly reflect disease control. ΔSUVmax may help better select patients needing an alternative to SIC, including ASCT.

The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical value of CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) for detection of distant metastases (DM) in newly diagnosed breast cancer. This retrospective study focuses on a population of 929 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (n=521) or metastatic breast cancer (n=408) diagnosed at the CGFL (Centre Georges Francois Leclerc) from 1998 to 2014. These patients underwent a measurement of CA 15-3, a measurement of CEA and an assessment of extension before any treatment. The initial concentrations of CEA are correlated with conventional prognostic factors. The cut-off value of CEA was determined and verified on two independents subpopulations determined in drawing lots. The ROC curve shows an AUC of 0.82 (p0.0001). At the threshold of 6.7 μg/L, CEA before treatment has a predictive value on the existence of DM independently of the CA 15-3 and other prognostic factors. The combination of CEA and CA 15-3 increases significantly the predictive value of CA 15-3 on the whole population (sensitivity increased by 9%) and on tumors expressing hormonal receptors. Concerning the only CEA the rate of false negative is of 52% and depends on the number and the type of the metastatic localization. Among the 28 patients without DM and a CEA6.7 μg/L, 15 have developed DM and 2 a new cancer. Thirteen will die of cancer. In conclusion, these facts confirm the independently predictive value of CEA before treatment on the existence of DM and its complementarity with CA 15-3 during the assessment of extension by imagery.

Background: The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study demonstrated that early PET assessment identified patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer who responded poorly to standard neoadjuvant therapy (docetaxel plus trastuzumab). Adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant therapy in PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (from 24·0% to 43·8%). We investigated whether the improved pCR rate translated into improved long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with a change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) ≥70% received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responder group). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax

International audience; Background: Increased-dose bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPescalated) improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), but is associated with increased risks of haematological toxicity, secondary myelodysplasia or leukaemia, and infertility. We investigated whether PET monitoring during treatment could allow dose de-escalation by switching regimen (BEACOPPescalated to ABVD) in early responders without loss of disease control compared with standard treatment without PET monitoring.Methods: AHL2011 is a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 study done in 90 centres across Belgium and France. Eligible patients were aged 16-60 years and had newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma, excluding nodular lymphocyte predominant subtype, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score less than 3, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Ann Arbor disease stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum-to-thorax ratio of 0·33 or greater than or extranodal localisation, and had received no previous treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Randomisation was unmasked and done centrally by the permuted block method. Patients were randomly assigned to standard treatment (BEACOPPescalated given every 21 days for six cycles) or PET-driven treatment. All patients received two cycles of upfront BEACOPPescalated, after which PET assessment was done (PET2). In the standard treatment group, PET2 patients completed two additional cycles of BEACOPPescalated induction therapy irrespective of PET2 findings. In the PET-driven treatment group, patients with positive PET2 scans received the further two cycles of BEACOPPescalated and those with a negative PET2 scan switched to two cycles of ABVD for the remaining induction therapy. In both treatment groups, PET at the end of induction therapy was used to decide whether to continue with consolidation therapy in those with negative scans or start salvage therapy in patients with positive scans (either two cycles of ABVD in PET2-negative patients in the PET-driven arm or two cycles of BEACOPPescalated). BEACOPPescalated consisted of bleomycin 10 mg/m2 and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8, etoposide 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-3, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine on days 1-7, and 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone on days 1-14. ABVD was given every 28 days (doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 15). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Non-inferiority analyses were done by intention to treat and per protocol. The study had a non-inferiority margin of 10%, to show non-inferiority of PET-guided treatment versus standard care with 80% power and an alpha of 2·5% (one-sided). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01358747.Findings: From May 19, 2011, to April 29, 2014, 823 patients were enrolled-413 in the standard care group and 410 in the PET-driven group. 346 (84%) of 410 patients in the PET-driven treatment group were assigned to receive ABVD and 51 (12%) to continue receiving BEACOPPescalated after PET2. With a median follow-up of 50·4 months (IQR 42·9-59·3), 5-year progression-free survival by intention to treat was 86·2%, 95% CI 81·6-89·8 in the standard treatment group versus 85·7%, 81·4-89·1 in the PET-driven treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·084, 95% CI 0·737-1·596; p=0·65) and per protocol the values were 86·7%, 95% CI 81·9-90·3 and 85·4%, 80·7-89·0, respectively (HR 1·144, 0·758-1·726; p=0·74). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (381 [92%] in the standard treatment group and 387 [95%] in the PET-driven treatment group), neutropenia (359 [87%] and 366 [90%]), anaemia (286 [69%] vs 114 [28%]), thrombocytopenia (271 [66%] and 163 [40%]), febrile neutropenia (145 [35%] and 93 [23%]), infections (88 [22%] and 47 [11%]), and gastrointestinal disorders (49 [11%] and 48 [11%]). Serious adverse events related to treatment were reported in 192 (47%) patients in the standard treatment group and 114 (28%) in the PET-driven treatment group, including infections (84 [20%] of 412 vs 50 [12%] of 407) and febrile neutropenia (21 [5%] vs 23 [6%]). Six (1%) patients in the standard care group died from treatment-related causes (two from septic shock, two from pneumopathy, one from heart failure, and one from acute myeloblastic leukaemia), as did two (

CA 125 assay is sometimes combined in practice with the one of CA 15-3 and CEA in the extension assessment of breast cancers. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the contribution of the initial CA 125 as an indicator of distant metastases (DM) or of serous inflammation (SI). This retrospective study concerns a population of 620 patients with breast cancer without metastatic extension (n=325) or metastatic breast cancer (n=295) diagnosed at the Georges-François Leclerc center from 1998 to 2014. Seventy-four patients had SI. We showed that initial CA 125 level is linked to the TNM clinic status, the HER2 status, the nature and the number of metastatic locations, the inflammation of the tumor or serous. The ROC curves and logistic regression analyses show that CA 125 is an independent predictive criterion of DM presence (threshold of 55 kU/L): this is the only positive marker in 7% of patients with DM. At the threshold of 110 kU/L, the CA 125 is the only predictive biologic factor for SI. In conclusion, these data present the independent predictive value of CA 125 on the presence of DM or SI on condition of usinga specific threshold for each of these uses.

International audience; Both total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), computed on baseline positron emission tomography (PET), and end of induction (EOI) PET are imaging biomarkers showing promise for early risk stratification in patients with high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma. A model was built incorporating these 2 factors in 159 patients from three prospective trials: 2 Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) studies and 1 Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) trial. Median follow up was 64 months. High TMTV (>510 cm3) and positive EOI PET were independent, significant risk factors for progression. Their combination stratified the population into 3 risk groups: patients with no risk factors (n = 102; 64%) had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 67% vs 33% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.9) for patients with 1 risk factor (n = 44; 27%) and only 23% (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.3-9.2) for patients with both risk factors (n = 13; 8%). 2-year PFS was respectively 90% vs 61% (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.2-10.4) and 46% (HR, 8.1; 95%CI, 3.1-21.3). This model enhances the prognostic value of PET staging and response assessment, identifying a subset of patients with a very high risk of progression and early treatment failure at 2 years.

International audience; Outcomes for follicular lymphoma (FL) have greatly improved, but most patients will ultimately relapse. High total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), computed from baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), is associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS), but circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may also reflect tumor burden and be of prognostic value. The aim of our study was to correlate CTCs and cfDNA with TMTV in FL at diagnosis and to determine their prognostic values. We retrospectively analyzed 133 patients (with previously untreated FL and a baseline PET) from 2 cohorts with either a baseline plasma sample (n = 61) or a bcl2-JH-informative peripheral blood (PB) sample (n = 68). Quantification of circulating bcl2-JH+ cells and cfDNA was performed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. A significant correlation was found between TMTV and both CTCs (P < .0001) and cfDNA (P < .0001). With a median 48-month follow-up, 4-year PFS was lower in patients with TMTV > 510 cm3 (P = .0004), CTCs >0.0018 PB cells (P = .03), or cfDNA >2550 equivalent-genome/mL (P = .04). In comparison with TMTV alone, no additional prognostic information was obtained by measuring CTCs. In contrast, Cox multivariate analysis, including cfDNA and TMTV, showed that both cfDNA and TMTV remained predictive of outcome. In conclusion, CTCs and cfDNA correlate with TMTV in FL, and all 3 influence patient outcome. PFS was shorter for patients with high cfDNA and TMTV, suggesting that these parameters provide relevant information for tumor-tailored therapy.

IF 1.128; International audience; Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positons emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) is used in many ways at baseline and during the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Many properties of the technique are used in the different steps of patient's management. Initial staging with PET-CT is more accurate than conventional imaging and PET-CT also became the gold standard imaging at the end of treatment with a negative PET-CT mandatory for reaching a complete remission. Early assessment of response by PET-CT is one of the most powerful prognostic factors for progression-free survival of patients with localized and advanced stages and allows guiding treatment. Conversely, previous studies showed that there is no role of FDG PET-CT for the patient's follow-up.; La tomographie par émission de positrons (TEP)-tomodensitométrie au fluorodésoxyglucose est utilisée de différentes manières au moment du diagnostic et pendant le traitement des lymphomes de Hodgkin. Plusieurs particularités de la TEP sont utilisées à différentes étapes de la prise en charge des patients. Lors du bilan initial, la TEP-tomodensitométrie est plus performante que les techniques d’imageries conventionnelles, mais l’est aussi en fin de traitement, un examen normal étant indispensable pour affirmer l’obtention d’une rémission complète. L’évaluation précoce en cours de traitement est un des facteurs pronostiques les plus puissants pour la survie sans progression et pour guider le traitement dans les maladies localisées et disséminées. À l’inverse, la TEP-tomodensitométrie n’a pas de rôle dans le suivi des patients.

International audience; See an invited perspective on this article on page 1043.This multicenter phase II study investigated a selective radiotherapy dose increase to tumor areas with significant (18)F-misonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) uptake in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: Eligible patients had locally advanced NSCLC and no contraindication to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The (18)F-FMISO uptake on PET/CT was assessed by trained experts. If there was no uptake, 66 Gy were delivered. In (18)F-FMISO-positive patients, the contours of the hypoxic area were transferred to the radiation oncologist. It was necessary for the radiotherapy dose to be as high as possible while fulfilling dose-limiting constraints for the spinal cord and lungs. The primary endpoint was tumor response (complete response plus partial response) at 3 mo. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival at 1 y. The target sample size was set to demonstrate a response rate of 40% or more (bilateral α = 0.05, power 1-β = 0.95). Results: Seventy-nine patients were preincluded, 54 were included, and 34 were (18)F-FMISO-positive, 24 of whom received escalated doses of up to 86 Gy. The response rate at 3 mo was 31 of 54 (57%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-71%) using RECIST 1.1 (17/34 responders in the (18)F-FMISO-positive group). DFS and overall survival at 1 y were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74), respectively. DFS was longer in the (18)F-FMISO-negative patients (P = 0.004). The radiotherapy dose was not associated with DFS when adjusting for the (18)F-FMISO status. One toxic death (66 Gy) and 1 case of grade 4 pneumonitis (>66 Gy) were reported. Conclusion: Our approach results in a response rate of 40% or more, with acceptable toxicity. (18)F-FMISO uptake in NSCLC patients is strongly associated with poor prognosis features that could not be reversed by radiotherapy doses up to 86 Gy.

International audience; Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) is now a standard of care in initial staging and treatment evaluation of lymphomas. It is also used in the interim evaluation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. However, several pitfalls may occur during or after treatment, because of the nonspecificity of F-FDG for lymphoma disease and treatment as immunotherapy, thus possibly induces misinterpretation and wrong treatment decision. The aim of this pictorial review is to provide an illustrated tutorial of the most frequent pitfalls found on F-FDG-PET/CT during or after treatment.

See an invited perspective on this article on page 1043.This multicenter phase II study investigated a selective radiotherapy dose increase to tumor areas with significant

International audience; Previous studies have suggested that early changes in blood flow (BF) in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated with 150-water are a surrogate biomarker of outcome in women with breast cancer. This study investigates, in the triple-negative breast cancer subtype, the prognostic relevance of tumor BF changes (Delta BF) in response to chemotherapy, assessed using a short dynamic F-18-FDG PET acquisition. Methods: Forty-six consecutive women with triple-negative breast cancer and an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were prospectively included. Women benefited from a baseline F-18-FDG PET examination with a 2-min chest-centered dynamic acquisition, started at the time of F-18-FDG injection. Breast tumor perfusion was calculated from this short dynamic image using a first-pass model. This dynamic PET acquisition was repeated after the first cycle of chemotherapy to measure early Delta BF. Delayed static PET acquisitions were also performed (90 min after F-18-FDG injection) to measure changes in tumor glucose metabolism (Delta SUVmax). The association between tumor BF, clinicopathologic characteristics, and patients' overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results: Median baseline tumor BF was 21 mL/min/100 g (range, 6-46 mL/min/100 g) and did not significantly differ according to tumor size, Scarf-Bloom-Richardson grade, or Ki-67 expression. Median tumor Delta BF was-30%, with highly scattered values (range, -93% to +118%). A weak correlation was observed between Delta BF and Delta SUVmax (r = +0.40, P = 0.01). The median follow-up was 30 mo (range, 6-73 mo). Eight women developed recurrent disease, 7 of whom died. Low OS was associated with menopausal history (P = 0.03), persistent or increased tumor vascularization on the interim PET (6.13F cutoff =-30%; P = 0.03), non-breast-conserving surgery (P = 0.04), and the absence of a pathologic complete response (pCR) (P = 0.01). Delta BF and pCR provided incremental prognostic stratification: 3-y OS was 100% in pCR women, 87% in no-pCR women but achieving an early tumor BF response, and only 48% in no-pCR/no-BF-response women (Delta BF cutoff = -30%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests the clinical usefulness of an early user- and patient-friendly 2-min dynamic acquisition to monitor breast tumor Delta BF to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using F-18-FDG PET/CT. Monitoring tumor perfusion and angiogenesis response to treatment seems to be a promising target for PET tracers.

Purpose International Prognostic Index (IPS) is the most widely used risk stratification index for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). The use of (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT at diagnosis allows a better characterization of extra-nodal involvement (ENI). We investigated if the type of ENI could affect the prognosis of stage IV HL patients diagnosed with PET/CT and if a specific prognostic index could be defined for these patients (pts). Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed 220 stage IV HL patients treated from 2005 to 2015 in three LYSA centers. We considered the local investigator interpretation based on the nuclear medicine physician PET/CT report. Regarding ENI, six subgroups were identified: involvement of lung and/or pericard and/or pleural, liver, diffuse and/or focal bone involvement, digestive system, and other involvements; we also considered bone marrow involvement based on the results of bone marrow biopsy. The main outcome was event free survival (EFS) defined by relapse, progression, death from any cause and initiation of a new therapy. For prognostication, we first evaluated the six variables of IPS-6 (corresponding to IPS without "stage IV" item) in this population. ENI was tested adjusted on the retained IPS variables. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to assess their prognostic ability for EFS. Cross-validation (10-fold) was used to select the more robust variables avoiding optimism. The finally selected variables constituted a score that was tested on overall survival (OS). Results Among the 220 stage IV patients, 135 (61%) were male. Median age was 33 years (range, 16-86) and 72 pts (33%) were ≥45 years. 130 pts (59%) presented constitutional symptoms. Nodular sclerosis subtype was observed in 163 pts (74%), mixed cellularity subtype in 25 pts (11%) and 47/157 pts (30%) presented EBV-positive HL. For biological parameters of IPS, 158 pts (80%) had low albumin level 15G/L in 42pts (19%) and lymphocyte count Conclusions: For stage IV HL defined by PET/CT, we developed a simple prognostic score based on age (≥45y) and liver involvement that identify a subgroup of patients with a poor outcome. These findings need to be validated in independent cohorts. Based on these results, whether HL pathogenesis differs by ENI sites should be investigated. Disclosures Bachy: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Sarkozy:ROCHE: Consultancy. Traverse-Glehen:Takeda: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Other: Travel. Salles:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Morphosys: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Epizyme: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Acerta: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Casasnovas:Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Ghesquieres:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

As the preparation phase of a multicenter clinical trial using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG), (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO), and 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we investigated whether 18 nuclear medicine centers would score tracer uptake intensity similarly and define hypoxic and proliferative volumes for 1 patient and we compared different segmentation methods.Ten (18)F-FDG, ten (18)F-FMISO, and ten (18)F-FLT PET/CT examinations were performed before and during curative-intent radiotherapy in 5 patients with NSCLC. The gold standards for uptake intensity and volume delineation were defined by experts. The between-center agreement (18 nuclear medicine departments connected with a dedicated network, SFMN-net [French Society of Nuclear Medicine]) in the scoring of uptake intensity (5-level scale, then divided into 2 levels: 0, normal; 1, abnormal) was quantified by κ-coefficients (κ). The volumes defined by different physicians were compared by overlap and κ. The uptake areas were delineated with 22 different methods of segmentation, based on fixed or adaptive thresholds of standardized uptake value (SUV).For uptake intensity, the κ values between centers were, respectively, 0.59 for (18)F-FDG, 0.43 for (18)F-FMISO, and 0.44 for (18)F-FLT using the 5-level scale; the values were 0.81 for (18)F-FDG and 0.77 for both (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT using the 2-level scale. The mean overlap and mean κ between observers were 0.13 and 0.19, respectively, for (18)F-FMISO and 0.2 and 0.3, respectively, for (18)F-FLT. The segmentation methods yielded significantly different volumes for (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT (P0.001). In comparison with physicians, the best method found was 1.5 × maximum SUV (SUVmax) of the aorta for (18)F-FMISO and 1.3 × SUVmax of the muscle for (18)F-FLT. The methods using the SUV of 1.4 and the method using 1.5 × the SUVmax of the aorta could be used for (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT. Moreover, for (18)F-FLT, 2 other methods (adaptive threshold based on 1.5 or 1.6 × muscle SUVmax) could be used.The reproducibility of the visual analyses of (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT PET/CT images was demonstrated using a 2-level scale across 18 centers, but the interobserver agreement was low for the (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT volume measurements. Our data support the use of a fixed threshold (1.4) or an adaptive threshold using the aorta background to delineate the volume of increased (18)F-FMISO or (18)F-FLT uptake. With respect to the low tumor-on-background ratio of these tracers, we suggest the use of a fixed threshold (1.4).

The role of interim PET/CT in guiding therapeutic strategies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is debated, mainly because interpretation rules vary among centres. This study aimed to explore the reproducibility and confirm the prognostic value of early PET/CT using the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. This international confirmatory study retrospectively evaluated 114 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with a rituximab-containing regimen. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles (PET2), with no therapy change based on the latter. Scans were interpreted by three observers using the Deauville five-point scale and ΔSUVmax between PET0 and PET2 was calculated. Interpretations were evaluated for interobserver agreement and for progression-free survival (PFS) prediction. Median follow-up was 39 months. Early PET/CT was predictive of outcome when interpreted with the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Using the five-point scale, the overall kappa value was 0.66 with the reference background set in the liver (score ≥4) and interobserver agreement was even better using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off (κ = 0.83). Moreover, the prognostic value of interim PET was slightly inferior when using a Deauville score ≥4 than when using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off: for the Deauville score the 3-year PFS estimate was 59 % (45–73 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 81 % (71–91 %) in PET2-negative patients (P = 0.003); for the 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off the 3-year PFS estimate was 44 % (23–65 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 79 % (70–88 %) in PET2-negative patients (P = 0.0002). Although the Deauville criteria are valid for assessing the prognostic value of early PET/CT in DLBCL, computation of the ΔSUVmax leads to better performance and interobserver reproducibility, and should be preferred when a baseline scan is available.

Purpose [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used for the staging and restaging of patients with aggressive lymphoma, but less is known about the utility of PET in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). In a prospective study, we evaluated the prognostic value of PET performed during treatment and at the end of treatment in 121 patients with FL treated with first-line immunochemotherapy. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated high–tumor burden FL were treated with six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) plus two cycles of rituximab, without rituximab maintenance. PET was performed before treatment, after four cycles of R-CHOP (interim PET), and at the end of treatment (final PET). PET scans were centrally reviewed. Results The total number of patients included was 121. Median age was 57 years. After central review, interim PET (n = 111) was negative in 76% of patients, and final PET (n = 106) was negative in 78%. With a median follow-up of 23 months, 2-year progression-free survival rates were 86% for interim PET–negative versus 61% for interim PET–positive patients (P = .0046) and 87% for final PET–negative versus 51% for final PET–positive patients (P < .001), respectively. Two-year overall survival also significantly differed according to final PET results: 100% versus 88% (P = .0128). Conclusion PET performed either after four cycles of R-CHOP or at the end of therapy was strongly predictive of outcome in this prospective study. Therapeutic intervention based on PET results during or after inductive treatment should be evaluated.

Resume L’objectif de cette etude retrospective a ete d’evaluer la valeur pronostique de la TEP au FDG realisee initialement pour des patients presentant un cancer de l’œsophage traite par radiochimiotherapie exclusive. Vingt-neuf patients suivis pour un cancer de l’œsophage de diagnostic recent ont ete inclus. Une TEP au FDG a ete realisee dans le cadre du bilan d’extension initial, avant radiochimiotherapie exclusive. La standardised uptake value maximale (SUVmax) de la neoplasie primitive a ete mesuree et la presence d’une ou plusieurs adenopathies hypermetaboliques a ete notee. Le volume et la hauteur de la lesion tumorale primitive ont ete mesures sur la TEP en utilisant deux seuils differents de SUV pour delimiter la tumeur : SUV = 2,5 et SUV = 40 % du SUVmax. Le suivi median a ete de 35 mois (IC 95 % = 26–41 mois). Treize patients (45 %) etaient decedes au moment du dernier suivi. L’analyse univariee (modele de Cox) a montre qu’un SUVmax superieur a 9,5 (HR = 4,57, p = 0,022) et la presence d’une ou plusieurs adenopathies hypermetaboliques (HR = 3,64, p = 0,029) sont deux facteurs pronostiques pejoratifs de la survie globale. Il n’a pas ete montre de valeur pronostique de l’âge, du sexe des patients, du type anatomopathologique, du stade clinique, du volume et de la hauteur de l’hypermetabolisme tumoral evalues par la TEP au FDG. Une analyse multivariee n’a pu etre realisee du fait du trop faible nombre d’evenements. Cette etude retrospective montre que la TEP au FDG apporte des informations pronostiques precoces pour les cancers de l’œsophage traites par radiochimiotherapie exclusive.

7503Background: Escalated BEACOPP (BEA) improves PFS but not OS in pts with advanced HL compared to ABVD and is associated to a higher risk of hematological toxicity, secondary leukemia and inferti...

Resume Cette revue decrit le role de differentes methodes d’imagerie pour evaluer la reponse au traitement dans le cancer du sein. Deux situations sont envisageables : celle de la chimiotherapie neoadjuvante du cancer du sein et celle des metastases. Beaucoup de donnees cliniques sont disponibles pour trois criteres : le volume de la tumeur, la captation du fluorodeoxyglucose mesuree en TEP et la perfusion de la tumeur evaluee soit par IRM dynamique, soit en TEP. La TEP au 2-18F fluoro-2-desoxy-D-glucose (FDG) permet la prediction de la reponse apres une ou deux cures de chimiotherapie. De nouvelles approches pourraient prochainement affiner le role de l’imagerie. Ainsi, la TEP a la thymidine est prometteuse dans l’evaluation de la proliferation tissulaire. Les analogues des œstrogenes pourraient etre utilises pour predire la reponse au traitement du cancer du sein hormonosensible. Beaucoup d’autres approches, quoique encore moins developpees, pourraient apporter de nouvelles perspectives, comme la spectroscopie de resonance magnetique ou l’imagerie optique de l’oxygenation de l’hemoglobine. L’imagerie offre egalement un potentiel de suivi des effets des traitements sur les recepteurs membranaires : le recepteur le plus etudie dans les modeles precliniques a ete le recepteur 2 du facteur de croissance epidermique humain (HER2). Les integrines, une famille de recepteurs d’adherence cellulaire, sont egalement une cible potentiellement importante pour l’imagerie. L’apoptose, la multiresistance et l’hypoxie peuvent aussi etre etudiees en utilisant des biomarqueurs appropries. Afin de permettre les essais multicentriques fiables de nouveaux medicaments, ces differentes approches d’imagerie ont encore besoin d’une amelioration de la normalisation de l’acquisition et du traitement des images.

Resume Objectifs Il est difficile, pour des raisons de duree d’acquisition, d’obtenir a la fois des tomoscintigraphies et des images planaires des poumons au cours des examens de ventilation et perfusion. Une solution retenue est d’additionner des projections afin d’obtenir des images pseudoplanaires. Le but de ce travail est de comparer ces images aux images planaires classiques en termes de classe de probabilite et de reproductibilite de lecture. Materiels et methodes Trente-quatre patients non consecutifs adresses pour suspicion d’embolie pulmonaire ont beneficie d’une scintigraphie pulmonaire de ventilation et de perfusion a l’aide d’une camera double tete. Chaque scintigraphie a ete acquise en mode planaire et en mode tomographique. Huit images pseudoplanaires ont ete generees par addition de trois projections consecutives. Deux medecins ont relu deux fois chaque examen anonyme et ont cote la probabilite d’embolie pulmonaire, selon les criteres de PIOPED modifies mais en l’absence de radiographie de thorax. Resultats La reproductibilite de lecture intraobservateur des images pseudoplanaires est bonne pour les deux lecteurs (κw = 0,69 et 0,78) et similaire a la reproductibilite de lecture des images planaires. La reproductibilite interobservateur (κw = 0,63) est egalement bonne. Il existe une bonne concordance des resultats obtenus a partir des deux modalites. Conclusions Les images pseudoplanaires presentent une bonne reproductibilite de lecture intra- et interobservateur et permettent d’obtenir, dans notre population, des resultats comparables aux images planaires conventionnelles en termes de probabilite d’embolie pulmonaire.

Purpose: To investigate the value of the metabolic tumor response assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), compared with clinicobiologic markers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Experimental Design: Fifty consecutive women with TNBC and an indication for NAC were prospectively included. Different pretreatment clinical, biologic, and pathologic biomarkers, including SBR grade, the Ki-67 proliferation index, androgen receptor expression, EGF receptor (EGFR), and cytokeratin 5/6 staining, were assessed. Tumor glucose metabolism at baseline and its change after the first cycle of NAC (ΔSUVmax) were assessed using FDG-PET. Results: The pCR rate was 42%. High Ki-67 proliferation index (P = 0.016), negative EGFR status (P = 0.042), and high ΔSUVmax (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with pCR. In multivariate logistic regression, both negative EGFR status (OR, 6.4; P = 0.043) and high ΔSUVmax (OR, 7.1; P = 0.014) were independent predictors of pCR. Using a threshold at −50%, tumor ΔSUVmax predicted pCR with a negative, a positive predictive value, and an accuracy of 79%, 70%, and 75%, respectively. Combining a low ΔSUVmax and positive EGFR status could predict non-pCR with an accuracy of 92%. Conclusions: It is important to define the chemosensitivity of TNBC to NAC early. Combining EGFR status and the metabolic response assessed with FDG-PET can help the physician to early predict the probability of achieving pCR or not. Given these results, the interest of response-guided tailoring of the chemotherapy might be tested in multicenter trials. Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5460–8. ©2015 AACR.

This review considers the potential utility of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers in the setting of response monitoring in breast cancer, with a special emphasis on glucose metabolic changes assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). In the neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer, the metabolic response can predict the final complete pathologic response after the first cycles of chemotherapy. Because tumor metabolic behavior highly depends on cancer subtype, studies are ongoing to define the optimal metabolic criteria of tumor response in each subtype. The recent multicentric randomized AVATAXHER trial has suggested, in the human epidermal growth factor 2-positive subtype, a clinical benefit of early tailoring the neoadjuvant treatment in women with poor metabolic response after the first course of treatment. In the bone-dominant metastatic setting, there is increasing clinical evidence that FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate imaging modality for assessment of the tumor response to treatment when both metabolic information and morphologic information are considered. Nevertheless, there is a need to define standardized metabolic criteria of response, including the heterogeneity of response among metastases, and to evaluate the costs and health outcome of FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging. New non-FDG radiotracers highlighting specific molecular hallmarks of breast cancer cells have recently emerged in preclinical and clinical studies. These biomarkers can take into account the heterogeneity of tumor biology in metastatic lesions. They may provide valuable clinical information for physicians to select and monitor the effectiveness of novel therapeutics targeting the same molecular pathways of breast tumor.

Summary Background An effective and well tolerated treatment is needed for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer who do not achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The AVATAXHER trial aimed to predict pathological complete response early with the use of PET and to investigate whether the addition of bevacizumab could improve the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response in patients unlikely to respond to treatment. Methods AVATAXHER was a randomised, open-label, non-comparative, multicentre phase 2 study that enrolled women (≥18 years of age) with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 26 oncology centres in France. Patients initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel (100 mg/m 2 intravenously every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks then 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for the second course). Before the first and second cycles, [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was done and the change in standardised uptake value was used to predict pathological complete response in each patient. Patients who were predicted to be responders on PET continued to receive standard therapy. Predicted non-responders were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m 2 intravenously every 3 weeks) and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks; group A) or continue on docetaxel plus trastuzumab alone (group B). Randomisation was open label and was done by an adaptive minimisation method. Although investigators and patients were aware of group assignment, the anatomo-pathologist in charge of centralised review of surgical samples and lymph nodes was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed pathological complete response according to the Chevallier classification. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses in this Article were done on all patients who received at least one dose of treatment starting from cycle 3. Survival outcomes are not yet mature. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01142778) and EUDRACT (2009-013410-26). Findings Between May 19, 2010, and Oct 1, 2012, 152 patients were recruited for the study. Ten patients were subsequently excluded, leaving 142 patients in the intention-to-treat population. Of these 142 patients, 69 were predicted by [ 18 F]-FDG PET to be treatment responders after two cycles of treatment. The 73 predicted non-responders were randomly assigned to group A (n=48) and group B (n=25). Pathological complete responses were noted in 37 (53·6%, 95% CI 41·2–65·7) of the PET responders, 21 (43·8%, 29·5–58·8) of those in group A, and six (24·0%, 9·4–45·1) of those in group B. Incidences of grade 3–4 adverse events were similar in all three groups. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (four in PET responders, five in group A, and three in group B), febrile neutropenia (one, three, and one, respectively), and myalgia (four, none, and one, respectively). Overall, 24 serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients (PET responders: nine events in four [6%] of 67 patients; group A: 14 events in ten [21%] of 47 patients; group B: one event in one [4%] of 25 patients). No deaths occurred during the study. Interpretation In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, early PET assessment can help to identify non-responders to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab therapy. In these patients, the addition of bevacizumab can increase the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. This potential new role for PET and the activity of bevacizumab in this setting need to be confirmed in larger phase 3 trials. Funding Roche France.

International audience; We investigated the prognostic value of total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). TMTV was measured in 114 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT at baseline before immunochemotherapy. TMTV was computed by summing the volumes of all lymphomatous lesions after applying the local SUVmax threshold of 41% using semiautomatic software. Prognostic value was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Median follow-up was 39 months. Average pretherapy TMTV was 509 ± 568 cm(3). The 3-year estimates of PFS were 77 % in the low metabolic burden group (TMTV ≤550 cm(3)) and 60% in the high metabolic burden group (TMTV >550 cm(3), p = 0.04), and prediction of OS was even better (87% vs. 60%, p = 0.0003). Cox regression showed independence of TMTV for OS prediction (p = 0.002) compared with other pretherapy indices of tumour burden, such as tumour bulk and the International Prognostic Index. Pretherapy TMTV is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with DLBCL.

To investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to predict a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Fifty-seven consecutive women with HER2-positive breast cancer, treated with trastuzumab plus taxane-based NAC, were prospectively included. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of the primary tumor and axillary nodes were measured at baseline (PET1.SUVmax) and after the first course of NAC (PET2.SUVmax). Tumor metabolic volumes were assessed to determine Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG). The tumor metabolic response (ΔSUVmax and ΔTLG) was calculated. In univariate analysis, negative hormonal receptor status (p = 0.04), high tumor grade (p = 0.03), and low tumor PET 2 .SUVmax (p = 0.001) were predictive of pCR. Tumor ΔSUVmax correlated with pCR (p = 0.03), provided that tumors with low metabolic activity at baseline were excluded. ΔTLG did not correlate with pCR. In multivariate analysis, tumor PET2.SUVmax