Search

Introduction: As the pharmaceutical advertising landscape evolves with digital advancements, this study examines public awareness and perceptions of medication advertisements in Saudi Arabia. It focuses on the effects of regulatory frameworks and evaluates how they influence public understanding and attitudes toward these advertisements. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic survey in Saudi Arabia in December 2023. The survey was distributed on social media platforms and reached a diverse sample of 440 participants. It covered public perception and attitudes toward drug advertisements, knowledge of regulatory laws, and preferences regarding advertising mediums. Results: Out of the 440 participants in the study, who were primarily employees with bachelor's degrees, there was a clear awareness of drug advertisements. The average age of the group was 33 years, and a significant portion (71.1%) held a bachelor's degree, with 51.1% being employed. The findings revealed that 25.5% of participants frequently noticed drug ads, while 22.7% saw them very often. Although many found the ads informative, there were significant concerns about unrealistic expectations and the risk of overmedication; 89.8% believed the ads set unrealistic expectations about the effectiveness of medications. Additionally, 60.7% thought that celebrity endorsements might mislead the audience, and 91.1% felt that ads should provide more detailed information about potential risks and side effects. Regarding preferred advertising platforms, mobile apps and websites were favored (47%), followed closely by social media (46.4%). A striking 93.2% of participants believed that drug ads on social media should be subject to stricter regulations, and 96.4% wanted more proactive monitoring of online advertising. Many also reported using other sources, such as medical review sites, to verify medication information. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical advertising in Saudi Arabia must balance ethical transparency with educational value. The influence of digital platforms underscores the necessity for stricter regulation and accurate information dissemination. A collaborative approach is essential to align advertising practices with public health interests and regulatory standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxidative stress has been hypothesized to play a crucial role in the complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Hyperglycaemia-mediated increases in free radicals have a deleterious effect on cellular compartments and nucleic acids, leading to imbalances between free radicals and antioxidant enzymes. This case–control study comprised two groups with 100 participants (50 T2D and 50 DN patients) and aimed to examine the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX), glutathione S-transferase P (GSTP1), and glutathione peroxidase 1(GPX1) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) risk in patients with T2D. An SNP genotyping assay was performed using TaqMan assay and real-time PCR to identify the SNPs (NOX rs4673, GSTP rs1695, GPX1 rs1050450). The Sanger method was used to validate our findings. Fisher chi-square analyses revealed no significant differences in these genes when comparing T2D patients with and without DN. Our findings suggest no association between the rs4673, rs1695, and rs1050450 SNPs and DN in Saudi patients with T2D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ear health and hearing loss (HL) among infants has devastating outcomes. With most HL being deemed preventable, the assessment of one's knowledge and attitude regarding this impairment is important. In Saudi Arabia, the state of the general population's knowledge on infant HL remains unknown. Objectives: To determine and further elucidate the general population's knowledge and attitude with regard to HL in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted on the general population of Saudi Arabia. A predetermined questionnaire was translated into Arabic. This was distributed among the targeted participants in several provinces of Saudi Arabia (central, northern, eastern, western, and southern) by using an online survey via social media. The data were collected and analyzed via the SPSS program. Results: The knowledge with moderate, poor, and good was determined among 60.9%, 29.6%, and 9.4% of the participants, respectively. The participants with positive and negative attitudes were detected among 92.6% and 7.4% of respondents, respectively. Increasing age was associated with better attitude, while increased knowledge was directly related to higher educational attainment. Those who have a child with HL had nearly twice as poor knowledge as those who do not have a child with HL (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Although most of the respondents possessed a positive attitude toward infant HL, their knowledge about it seems to be lacking. Thus, there is a need to address these knowledge gaps regarding infant HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Diabetes-related retinopathy (DR), the most common complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), is a severe and preventable cause of visual loss and blindness that has been reported to be the fourth leading cause of blindness among four million cases globally. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of fourth- and fifth-year medical students concerning patients with DR. Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at a College of Medicine in Saudi Arabia, in November 2018, and comprised 153 fourth- and fifth-year medical students of both sexes. Participants were required to complete a previously validated hard copy questionnaire. Results: In total, > 50% of participants showed good knowledge of DR (poor participant knowledge, n = 65, 42.5%). We found 16 (10.5%) participants had poor attitudes to DR compared to 137 (89.5%) of participants with good attitudes, and 32 (20.9%) participants showed poor practices compared to 121 (79.1%) participants showing good practices. There was a statistically significant difference between the sexes and the level of practice (P = 0.021). Conclusions: More than 50% of participants in our study showed good knowledge concerning DR, with excellent attitudes and practices. Moreover, participants' age was identified as a significant factor affecting practice regarding DR. More targeted education is required to improve their knowledge base in regard to DR. Medical faculties have a significant role in the education of medical students to ensure greater awareness of DR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact, with >771 million confirmed cases and 6 million deaths reported by October 2023. Cancer patients, due to their immunosuppressed status, face an increased infection risk and higher COVID-19 complications. The present study aimed to assess clinical outcomes in COVID-19-infected cancer patients, focusing on mortality rates and other aspects, providing valuable insight for better protection and outcomes. This systematic review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases from August 2023 following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies from 2020 to 2023 pertaining to the impact of COVID-19 on patients previously diagnosed with malignancies were considered. Inclusion criteria entailed a pre-existing malignancy diagnosis, confirmed COVID-19 infection and an impact of COVID-19 on any aspect of the patient's cancer management. Studies written in English were exclusively reviewed. Post-COVID-19 malignancy diagnoses, case reports, review articles and data-insufficient studies were excluded. Screening and consensus on eligibility were carried out by a team of four authors, with disputes resolved by a non-screening author. Data extraction was performed by a five-author team, detailing study and population characteristics, as well as cancer patient outcomes related to COVID-19. Cross-checking was conducted by the same team, with conflicts resolved by a third author. The review of 27 studies explored COVID-19's impact on oncology, revealing diverse sample sizes (1,807,559 to 177 participants). Studies spanned various cancer types, including gastric adenocarcinoma, breast, lung, gynecologic, colorectal and non-melanoma skin cancer. Mortality rates were higher among cancer patients with COVID-19 compared to those without. Gastric adenocarcinoma exhibited a 5.9% mortality rate. Thoracic cancer patients faced elevated mortality and gastrectomies decreased. A meta-analysis (10 studies, 5,151 patients) showed a 19.1% mortality rate for COVID-19-infected cancer patients, contrasting with 1% for non-COVID-19 cancer patients (5 studies, 54,528 patients). The odds ratio for mortality in non-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19 cancer patients was 0.1036 (3 studies, 3,496 patients). Cancer patients consistently faced elevated mortality during the pandemic, with specific cancers showing unique impacts. Gastric adenocarcinoma exhibited a significant COVID-19 mortality rate. Patients with thoracic cancer faced increased risks, influencing surgical trends. Meta-analysis revealed an overall elevated mortality rate among COVID-19-infected cancer patients compared to non-COVID-19 counterparts., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright: © 2024 Ahmed et al.)

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to the global healthcare system, necessitating effective therapeutic strategies to mitigate its impact. This study investigates the significance of early antiviral therapy in the context of intensive care units (ICUs) and its potential to influence the progression and outcomes of severe COVID-19 cases. Methodology This retrospective cohort study leveraged a diverse patient population with confirmed severe COVID-19 admitted to ICUs. A total of 1,250 patients were included in the analysis, and their medical records were comprehensively reviewed. The study aimed to assess the impact of early antiviral therapy on patient outcomes, focusing on the administration of remdesivir within the first 48 hours of ICU admission. Results In a study of 1,250 COVID-19 patients, early antiviral therapy with remdesivir significantly reduced ICU admissions by 30% (N = 225) compared to standard care (N = 525). The early therapy group also exhibited a 20% lower mortality rate (N = 120) than the control group (N = 150). Demographic associations with antiviral usage were observed. Kaletra was favored by females, non-Saudi individuals, and healthcare workers, while favipiravir was associated with gender. Remdesivir and ribavirin use were linked to gender and Saudi nationality, while oseltamivir was related to gender, Saudi nationality, and body mass index. Microbiological cure rates were 15.4%, with 84.6% not achieving it. ICU outcomes included 37.7% deaths, 55.7% home discharges, and 6.6% transfers, while hospital outcomes featured 38.5% deaths, 54.4% home discharges, and 7.1% transfers. Conclusions This study presents a comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 patient demographics, antiviral medication associations, and clinical outcomes. The findings highlight the significance of tailoring treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and viral history. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of COVID-19 management and can inform clinical decision-making and further research in this field., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Alkhunaizi et al.)