Search

The purpose of this study was to examine balance abilities of older adults using the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (CTSIB), more commonly known as the Foam and Dome Test. This test evaluates an individual's ability to maintain upright standing under altered visual and support surface conditions. Sixty-nine community dwelling older adults of culturally diverse backgrounds who attend North Philadelphia, PA senior centers participated in the study. The mean age of the group was 76.3 years (SD = + /- 8.1, range 61-97). Individuals were timed on the six different conditions of CTSIB. A perfect score was 30 seconds. Of the sixty-nine participants, forty-six were able to complete all conditions. Scores tended to decrease as the difficulty of the conditions increased.. Older adults tend to use visual input to maintain balance even with conflicting visual information; and tend to have better standing balance on hard versus compliant surfaces. To assess balance abilities of patients when using the CTSIB, clinicians can use the norms developed on community dwelling older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy., Methods: Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups., Results: Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71])., Conclusions: Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.

Importance: Clinical trials have suggested that prehospital management in a mobile stroke unit (MSU) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke who are potentially eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, but there is a paucity of real-world evidence from routine clinical practice on this topic., Objective: To determine the association between prehospital management in an MSU vs standard emergency medical services (EMS) management and the level of global disability at hospital discharge., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that included consecutive patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke who received either prehospital management in an MSU or standard EMS management between August 1, 2018, and January 31, 2023. Follow-up ended at hospital discharge. The primary analytic cohort included those who were potentially eligible for IV thrombolysis. A separate, overlapping cohort including all patients regardless of diagnosis was also analyzed. Patient data were obtained from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) Program, a nationwide, multicenter quality assurance registry. This analysis was completed in May 2024., Exposure: Prehospital management in an MSU (vs standard EMS management)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) score. The secondary efficacy end point was independent ambulation status. The coprimary safety end points were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and in-hospital mortality., Results: Of 19 433 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [62-83] years; 9867 female [50.8%]) treated at 106 hospitals, 1237 (6.4%) received prehospital management in an MSU. Prehospital management in an MSU was associated with a better score on the UW-mRS at discharge (adjusted mean difference, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) and a higher likelihood of independent ambulation at discharge (53.3% [468 of 878 patients] vs 48.3% [5868 of 12 148 patients]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). There was no statistically significant difference in sICH (5.2% [57 of 1094] vs 4.2% [545 of 13 014]; aRR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94-1.75]) or in-hospital mortality (5.7% [70 of 1237] vs 6.2% [1121 of 18 196]; aRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.27) between the 2 groups., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke potentially eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, prehospital management in an MSU compared with standard EMS management was associated with a significantly lower level of global disability at hospital discharge. These findings support policy efforts to expand access to prehospital MSU management.

Study Objective: Interhospital transfer is often required in the care of patients with hemorrhagic stroke. Guidelines recommend a door-in-door-out (DIDO) time of ≤120 minutes at the transferring emergency department (ED); however, it is unknown whether DIDO times are related to clinical outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke., Methods: Retrospective, observational cohort study using US registry data from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke participating hospitals. Patients include those aged ≥18 years with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who were transferred from the ED to a Get With The Guidelines participating receiving hospital from January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2022. The primary outcome was ordinal discharge modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and secondary outcomes included dichotomous discharge mRS, ability to ambulate independently at discharge, and inhospital mortality at the receiving hospital., Results: In all, 19,708 ICH and 7,757 patients with SAH were included. For patients with ICH, an increasing DIDO time was associated with greater odds of mRS 0 to 3 versus 4 to 6 at discharge in the unadjusted analyses (DIDO 91 to 180 minutes, odds ratio [OR] 1.15 [1.04 to 1.27]; DIDO 181 to 270 minutes, OR 1.51 [1.33, 1.71]; DIDO >270 minutes, OR 1.83 [1.58, 2.11]; versus DIDO ≤90 minutes). In the adjusted analyses, no associations were observed. Similar results were seen for mRS at discharge in patients with SAH. In both patients with ICH and SAH, longer DIDO times were associated with greater odds of independent ambulation at discharge and lower odds of inhospital mortality in the unadjusted analyses. After adjustment, the effect sizes of these associations were reduced, with some of the results based on quartiles becoming statistically nonsignificant., Conclusion: These findings suggest that EDs currently expedite the transfer of the sickest patients; however, prospective studies and more granular data are needed to understand the impact of early treatment and timing of transfer for patients with hemorrhagic stroke., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Little is known about the use of cangrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS)., Methods: CAMEO (Cangrelor in Acute MI: Effectiveness and Outcomes) is a multicenter observational registry evaluating platelet inhibition in patients with MI. We examined the duration of cangrelor infusion and the amount of time to transition from cangrelor to an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor in patients with CS. We also assessed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding risks, stratified by dosage duration, time to transition and oral P2Y 12 inhibitor potency., Results: Among 2352 cangrelor-treated patients with MI, 249 patients were in CS. Among the patients with CS, 16 (6.4%) received the "bridge" infusion dose, 202 (81.1%) the PCI cangrelor infusion dose, and 30 (12.0%) had a combination of both infusion doses. Patients with CS had a median age of 66 years; 32% were women; 21% were Black patients; 35% had diabetes; 19% received thrombectomy; and 59% received mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (35% intra-aortic balloon pump, 27% Impella). The median duration of infusion was 3.9 (2-21.5 hours) in patients with CS and was 2 (1.6-3.1 hours) for all cangrelor-treated patients. The median duration of transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y 12 inhibitor administration was 0.1 (-0.5-21.0 hours) for patients with CS. In multivariable modeling, chronic lung disease and the use of MCS and was associated with longer cangrelor infusions (defined as > 3.9 hours). Among cangrelor-treated patients with CS, 24.1% of these patients had a bleeding event, and 41.8% had a MACE event. After adjustment, a longer cangrelor infusion duration was associated with increased risk of bleeding (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The median duration of cangrelor infusion was longer for patients presenting with CS. Use of MCS was associated with longer cangrelor infusion durations in patients with CS. Further work is needed to understand the pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet agents in patients with CS., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Disparities in guideline-based quality measures likely contribute to differences in heart failure (HF) outcomes. We evaluated between- and within-hospital differences in the quality of care across sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance for patients hospitalized for HF., Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients hospitalized for HF across 596 hospitals in the Get With the Guidelines-HF registry between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated performance across 7 measures stratified by patient sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. We evaluated differences in performance with and without adjustment for the treating hospital. We also measured variation in hospital-specific disparities., Results: Among 685 227 patients, the median patient age was 72 (interquartile range, 61-82) and 47.2% were women. Measure performance was significantly lower (worse) for women compared with men for all 7 measures before adjustment. For 4 of 7 measures, there were no significant sex-related differences after patient-level adjustment. For 20 of 25 other comparisons, racial and ethnic minorities and Medicaid/uninsured patients had similar or higher (better) adjusted measure performance compared with White and Medicare/privately insured patients, respectively. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor measure performance was significantly lower for Asian, Hispanic, and Medicaid/uninsured patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription was lower among women and Black patients after hospital adjustment, indicating within-hospital differences. There was hospital-level variation in these differences. For cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription, 278 hospitals (46.6%) had ≥2% lower implant/prescription for Black versus White patients compared with 109 hospitals (18.3%) with the same or higher cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation/prescription for Black patients., Conclusions: HF quality measure performance was equitable for most measures. There were within-hospital differences in angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and cardiac resynchronization therapy implant/prescription for historically marginalized groups. The magnitude of hospital-specific disparities varied across hospitals., Competing Interests: Dr Sandhu has received research support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant 1K23HL151672), the American Heart Association, the Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation, and Sanofi. Dr Sandhu serves as a consultant for Lexicon Pharmaceuticals and Reprieve Cardiovascular. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, the American Heart Association (929502), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, scPharmaceuticals, and Sanofi; serves as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corteria Pharmaceuticals, CSL Vifor, Merck, PharmaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Fonarow reports consulting for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Purpose: Unanticipated health care resource utilization, in the form of either emergency department utilization (EDU) or hospital admission (HA), may be an indicator of lower-quality cancer care. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive model for EDU and HAs within 14 days of receipt of systemic therapy for patients with solid tumors., Methods: We abstracted electronic health data on oncology encounters from all patients receiving systemic therapy for solid tumors from March 1, 2015, to August 21, 2020, in the Duke University Health System. We defined a primary composite outcome of an EDU or HA within 14 days after the encounter and then developed a predictive model for the primary outcome using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. To evaluate the model, we calculated the area under the receiver operator curve and the calibration slope., Results: Twelve thousand eight hundred ninety unique patients with 134,641 oncology encounters were included. Five thousand one hundred fifty of these patients (40.0%) had at least one EDU or HA within 14 days of at least one treatment. Forty-six variables were incorporated into the final model. The top predictors, in order of absolute value of the predictive coefficients, were temperature, systolic blood pressure, cancer group, and marital status. The model's AUC was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.722 to 0.732), indicating good sensitivity and specificity to outcome., Conclusion: The model developed in this study demonstrated good sensitivity in identifying patients with solid tumors who are at highest risk for EDU or HA and could be implemented in clinical practice to allow for preventive outpatient interventions.

Background: U.S. nationwide estimates of the proportion of patients newly diagnosed with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) eligible for quadruple medical therapy, and the associated benefits of rapid implementation, are not well characterized., Objectives: This study sought to characterize the degree to which patients newly diagnosed with HFrEF are eligible for quadruple medical therapy, and the projected benefits of in-hospital initiation., Methods: Among patients hospitalized for newly diagnosed HFrEF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from 2016 to 2023, eligibility criteria based on regulatory labeling, guidelines, and expert consensus documents were applied for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapies. Of those eligible, the projected effect of quadruple therapy on 12-month mortality was modeled using treatment effects from pivotal clinical trials utilized by the AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure, and compared with observed outcomes among patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and beta-blockers., Results: Of 33,036 patients newly diagnosed with HFrEF, 27,158 (82%) were eligible for quadruple therapy, and 30,613 (93%) were eligible for ≥3 components. From 2021 to 2023, of patients eligible for quadruple therapy, 15.3% were prescribed quadruple therapy and 41.5% were prescribed triple therapy. Among Medicare beneficiaries eligible for quadruple therapy, 12-month incidence of mortality was 24.7% and HF hospitalization was 22.2%. Applying the relative risk reductions in clinical trials, complete implementation of quadruple therapy by time of discharge was projected to yield absolute risk reductions in 12-month mortality of 10.4% (number needed to treat = 10) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and beta-blocker, and 24.8% (number needed to treat = 4) compared with no GDMT., Conclusions: In this nationwide U.S. cohort of patients hospitalized for newly diagnosed HFrEF, >4 of 5 patients were projected as eligible for quadruple therapy at discharge; yet, <1 in 6 were prescribed it. If clinical trial benefits can be fully realized, in-hospital initiation of quadruple medical therapy for newly diagnosed HFrEF would yield large absolute reductions in mortality., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) program is provided by the American Heart Association and sponsored, in part, by Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Eli Lilly Diabetes Alliance, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Bayer. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards or as consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corteria Pharmaceuticals, CSL Vifor, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, scPharmaceuticals, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and has received speaker fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Lexicon, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Fonarow has consulted for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Jackson serves as a consultant to Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer and receives honoraria from Zoll LifeVest, CME Outfitters, Health Monitor, PRIME Education, and WebMD/Medscape. Dr Thomas is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Janssen, Zio, and Bristol Myers Squibb and receives honoraria from Medscape. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest.

Background: Black patients meeting indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have lower rates of implantation compared with White patients. There is little understanding of how mental health impacts the decision-making process among Black patients considering ICDs. Our objective was to assess the association between depressive symptoms and ICD implantation among Black patients with heart failure., Methods and Results: This is a secondary analysis of the VIVID (Videos to Address Racial Disparities in ICD Therapy via Innovative Designs) randomized trial, which enrolled self-identified Black individuals with chronic systolic heart failure. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and the Mental Component Summary of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Decisional conflict was measured by an adapted Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). ANCOVA was used to assess differences in Decisional Conflict Scale scores. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between depressive symptoms and ICD implantation. Among 306 participants, 60 (19.6%) reported depressed mood, and 142 (46.4%) reported anhedonia. Participants with the lowest Mental Component Summary of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores (poorer mental health and higher likelihood of depression) had greater decisional conflict regarding ICD implantation compared with those with the highest Mental Component Summary of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores (adjusted mean difference in Decisional Conflict Scale score, 3.2 [95% CI, 0.5-5.9]). By 90-day follow-up, 202 (66.0%) participants underwent ICD implantation. There was no association between either the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score or the Mental Component Summary of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey score and ICD implantation., Conclusions: Depressed mood and anhedonia were prevalent among ambulatory Black patients with chronic systolic heart failure considering ICD implantation. The presence of depressive symptoms did not impact the likelihood of ICD implantation in this population.

Objectives: A reliable method of predicting large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in data sets without neuroimaging could be retrospectively applied to expand research efforts., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort analysis of the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke registry. We included adult patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke from 2016 to 2021 who had brain and vascular imaging and excluded those with missing data or posterior circulation stroke., Results: We included 416,022 patients of which 125,381 (30.1%) had LVO. The mean age was 71 years, and 48.2% were female. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the final model, including age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, TOAST stroke mechanism, and NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), was 0.79 (95% CI 0.79-0.80). Without TOAST mechanism, the AUC was 0.74. The specificity did not exceed 0.5 using different cut points for the NIHSS., Discussion: We found that 30% of adult acute ischemic stroke patients in GWTG-Stroke have LVO and that the combination of clinical covariates and NIHSS is only moderately predictive of LVO status. These results are consistent with previous studies and suggest it may not be possible to retrospectively predict LVO with high accuracy in data sets without vascular neuroimaging.

Importance: Understanding trends in the representation of women and individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic populations in cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular subspecialty fellowships is essential to improving the diversity of the cardiology workforce., Objective: To examine changes in the representation of women and underrepresented individuals in cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular subspecialty fellowships over time., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of trainee sex and race and ethnicity in various training programs from 2008 to 2022 used data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's publicly available online source. Participants included all residents, internal medicine residents, general surgery residents, and fellows in cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular subspecialty fellowships., Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages of women and Black and Hispanic trainees in these programs were calculated for each year. Mann-Kendall tests were used to determine if changes over the years represented a significant trend., Results: Among the 3320 cardiovascular disease trainees in 2022, 848 (25.5%) were women, and 459 (13.8%) were Black or Hispanic, less than the representation among internal medicine trainees at 43.8% and 15.6%, respectively. However, the percentage of women trainees in cardiovascular disease significantly increased from 17.6% in 2008 (P = .001 for time trend) and also increased for interventional cardiology fellowships (from 6.3% in 2008 to 20.1% in 2022; P = .002). Over the same period, the proportion of women in general surgery increased from 27.4% to 45.2% (P < .001). The percentage of Black and Hispanic trainees in internal medicine significantly increased from 8.6% in 2012 (P < .001) while increases in general surgery were not statistically significant (9.7% to 16.1%; P = .35). There were also important increases in the percentages of Black and Hispanic trainees in cardiovascular disease (from 8.3% in 2012; P = .09) and interventional cardiology (3.8% to 13.4%; P = .12)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the representation of women in cardiovascular fellowships, including interventional cardiology, increased over recent years. While representation of Black and Hispanic individuals is low in all residencies, including cardiovascular fellowships, recent positive trends are important to recognize and provide hope to drive future efforts.

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program was launched in 2013 with a goal to improve care quality while lowering costs to Medicare., Objective: To compare changes in the quality and outcomes of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure according to hospital participation in the BPCI program., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a difference-in-difference approach to evaluate the BPCI program in 18 BPCI hospitals vs 211 same-state non-BPCI hospitals for various process-of-care measures and outcomes using American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry and CMS Medicare claims data from November 1, 2008, to August 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to May 2023., Exposures: Hospital participation in CMS BPCI Model 2 Heart Failure, which paid hospitals in a fee-for-service process and then shared savings or required reimbursement depending on how the total cost of an episode of care compared with a target price., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points included 7 quality-of-care measures. Secondary end points included 9 outcome measures, including in-hospital mortality and hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmission rate and mortality rate., Results: During the study period, 8721 patients were hospitalized in the 23 BPCI hospitals and 94 530 patients were hospitalized in the 224 same-state non-BPCI hospitals. Less than a third of patients (30 723 patients, 29.8%) were 75 years or younger; 54 629 (52.9%) were female, and 48 622 (47.1%) were male. Hospital participation in BPCI Model 2 was not associated with significant differential changes in the odds of various process-of-care measures, except for a decreased odds of evidence-based β-blocker at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98; P = .04). Participation in the BPCI was not associated with a significant differential change in the odds of receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors at discharge, receiving an aldosterone antagonist at discharge, having a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-defibrillator or CRT pacemaker placed or prescribed at discharge, having implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) counseling or an ICD placed or prescribed at discharge, heart failure education being provided among eligible patients, or having a follow-up visit within 7 days or less. Participation in the BPCI was associated with a significant decrease in odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86; P = .002). Participation was not associated with a significant differential change in hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day or 90-day all-cause readmission rate and 30-day or 90-day all-cause mortality rate., Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, hospital participation in the BPCI Model 2 Heart Failure program was not associated with improvement in process-of-care quality measures or 30-day or 90-day risk-adjusted all-cause mortality and readmission rates.

Importance: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest stroke subtype, and mortality rates are especially high in anticoagulation-associated ICH. Recently, specific anticoagulation reversal strategies have been developed, but it is not clear whether there is a time-dependent treatment effect for door-to-treatment (DTT) times in clinical practice., Objective: To evaluate whether DTT time is associated with outcome among patients with anticoagulation-associated ICH treated with reversal interventions., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke quality improvement registry. Patients with ICH who presented within 24 hours of symptom onset across 465 US hospitals from 2015 to 2021 were included. Data were analyzed from January to September 2023., Exposures: Anticoagulation-associated ICH., Main Outcomes and Measures: DTT times and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression modeling, adjusted for demographic, history, baseline, and hospital characteristics, with hospital-specific random intercepts to account for clustering by site. The primary outcome of interest was the composite inpatient mortality and discharge to hospice. Additional prespecified secondary outcomes, including functional outcome (discharge modified Rankin Scale score, ambulatory status, and discharge venue), were also examined., Results: Of 9492 patients with anticoagulation-associated ICH and documented reversal intervention status, 4232 (44.6%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 77 (68-84) years. A total of 7469 (78.7%) received reversal therapy, including 4616 of 5429 (85.0%) taking warfarin and 2856 of 4069 (70.2%) taking a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant. For the 5224 patients taking a reversal intervention with documented workflow times, the median (IQR) onset-to-treatment time was 232 (142-482) minutes and the median (IQR) DTT time was 82 (58-117) minutes, with a DTT time of 60 minutes or less in 1449 (27.7%). A DTT time of 60 minutes or less was associated with decreased mortality and discharge to hospice (adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99) but no difference in functional outcome (ie, a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.67-1.24). Factors associated with a DTT time of 60 minutes or less included White race, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower stroke severity., Conclusions and Relevance: In US hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke, earlier anticoagulation reversal was associated with improved survival for patients with ICH. These findings support intensive efforts to accelerate evaluation and treatment for patients with this devastating form of stroke.

Background: Patients with ischemic stroke and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes than those without this infection, but the impact of COVID-19 on hemorrhagic stroke remains unclear. We aimed to assess if COVID-19 worsens outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)., Methods and Results: We conducted an observational study of ICH outcomes using Get With The Guidelines Stroke data. We compared patients with ICH who were COVID-19 positive and negative during the pandemic (March 2020-February 2021) and prepandemic (March 2019-February 2020). Main outcomes were poor functional outcome (defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 4 to 6 at discharge), mortality, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility or hospice. The first stage included 60 091 patients with ICH who were COVID-19 negative and 1326 COVID-19 positive. In multivariable analyses, patients with ICH with versus without COVID-19 infection had 68% higher odds of poor outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.68 [95% CI, 1.41-2.01]), 51% higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.33-1.71]), and 66% higher odds of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility/hospice (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.43-1.93]). The second stage included 62 743 prepandemic and 64 681 intrapandemic cases with ICH. In multivariable analyses, patients with ICH admitted during versus before the COVID-19 pandemic had 10% higher odds of poor outcomes (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07-1.14]), 5% higher mortality (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.08]), and no significant difference in the risk of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility/hospice (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.95])., Conclusions: The pathophysiology of the COVID-19 infection and changes in health care delivery during the pandemic played a role in worsening outcomes in the patient population with ICH.

Importance: Understanding is needed of racial and ethnic-specific trends in care quality and outcomes associated with the US nationwide quality initiative Target: Stroke (TS) in targeting thrombolysis treatment for acute ischemic stroke., Objective: To examine whether the TS quality initiative was associated with improvement in thrombolysis metrics and outcomes across racial and ethnic groups., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients who presented within 4.5 hours of ischemic stroke onset at hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke initiative from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2021. The data analysis was performed between December 15, 2022, and November 27, 2023., Exposures: TS phases I (2010-2013), II (2014-2018), and III (2019-2021)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were thrombolysis rates and time metrics. Patient function and mortality were secondary outcomes., Results: Analyses included 1 189 234 patients, of whom 1 053 539 arrived to the hospital within 4.5 hours. The cohort included 50.4% female and 49.6% male patients and 2.8% Asian [median (IQR) age, 72 (61-82) years], 15.2% Black [median (IQR) age, 64 (54-75) years], 7.3% Hispanic [median (IQR) age, 68 (56-79) years], and 74.1% White [median (IQR) age, 75 (63-84) years] patients). Unadjusted thrombolysis rates increased in both the pre-TS (2003-2009) and TS periods in all racial and ethnic groups from 10% to 15% in 2003 to 43% to 46% in 2021, but disparities were observed in adjusted analyses and persisted in TS phase III, with Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients having significantly lower odds of receiving thrombolysis than White patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81-0.90], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.74-0.78], and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89], respectively). Door-to-needle (DTN) times improved in all racial and ethnic groups during TS, with DTN times of 60 minutes or less increasing from 26% to 28% in 2009 to 66% to 72% in 2021. However, in adjusted analyses, racial and ethnic disparities emerged. During TS phase III, compared with White patients, Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients had significantly lower odds of receiving thrombolysis with a DTN time of 60 minutes or less compared with White patients (risk-adjusted odds ratios, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.75-0.81], and 0.87 [95% CI, 0.83-0.92], respectively). During TS, clinical outcomes improved for all racial and ethnic groups from pre-TS, with TS phase III showing higher odds of ambulation at discharge among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White patients. Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients were less likely to present within 4.5 hours., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with ischemic stroke, the TS quality initiative was associated with improvement in thrombolysis frequency, timeliness, and outcomes for all racial and ethnic groups. However, disparities persisted, indicating a need for further interventions.

Background: Patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are at risk for worsening clinical status. Little is known about the frequency of therapeutic changes during hospitalization. We characterized the use of medical therapies before, during and after hospitalization in patients with HF and DM., Methods: We identified Medicare beneficiaries in Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) hospitalized between July 2014 and September 2019 with Part D prescription coverage. We evaluated trends in the use of 7 classes of antihyperglycemic therapies (metformin, sulfonylureas, GLP-1RA, SGLT2-inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, and insulins) and 4 classes of HF therapies (evidence-based β-blockers, ACEi or ARB, MRA, and ARNI). Medication fills were assessed at 6 and 3 months before hospitalization, at hospital discharge and at 3 months post-discharge., Results: Among 35,165 Medicare beneficiaries, the median age was 77 years, 54% were women, and 76% were white; 11,660 (33%) had HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%), 3700 (11%) had HFmrEF (LVEF 41%-49%), and 19,805 (56%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%). Overall, insulin was the most commonly prescribed antihyperglycemic after HF hospitalization (n = 12,919, 37%), followed by metformin (n = 7460, 21%) and sulfonylureas (n = 7030, 20%). GLP-1RA (n = 700, 2.0%) and SGLT2i (n = 287, 1.0%) use was low and did not improve over time. In patients with HFrEF, evidence-based beta-blocker, RASi, MRA, and ARNI fills during the 6 months preceding HF hospitalization were 63%, 62%, 19%, and 4%, respectively. Fills initially declined prior to hospitalization, but then rose from 3 months before hospitalization to discharge (beta-blocker: 56%-82%; RASi: 51%-57%, MRA: 15%-28%, ARNI: 3%-6%, triple therapy: 8%-20%; P < 0.01 for all). Prescription rates 3 months after hospitalization were similar to those at hospital discharge., Conclusions: In-hospital optimization of medical therapy in patients with HF and DM is common in participating hospitals of a large US quality improvement registry., Competing Interests: Disclosures GCF reports receiving research funding from the NIH and serving as a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CHF Solutions, Edwards, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. SJG has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair's Research Award, American Heart Association (#929502), National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/ Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; serves as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/ Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Vifor, Merck, PharmaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Cytokinetics. ADD reports receiving research funding through the Duke Clinical Research Institute from the American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Intra-Cellular Therapies, American Regent, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; serving as a consultant for AstraZeneca; receiving nonfinancial support from Amgen, Bayer, CareDx, InnaMed, LivaNova, Mardil Medical, Novartis, Procyrion, scPharmaceuticals, Story Health, and Zoll; and receiving nonfinancial support from Abbott for educational activities outside the submitted work. JB declares that he serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squib, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Relypsa, Roche, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. KL and JJM are employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock options with the company. KEJM reports receiving grants from NIH/NHLBI, NIH/National Institute on Aging, and NIH/NINR; receiving research support from Humana; and serving on the Health Policy Advisory Council for the Centene Corp (St. Louis, MO). ATO reports serving as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Renovacor, and Cytokinetics outside the submitted work. PNP reports receiving grant funding from the NHLBI (grant R33HL143324-02) and personal fees from American Heart Association outside the submitted work. SDS has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, US2.AI and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boeringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, and Akros. OV receives research support from Bayer and Cardurion, and served on advisory board for AstraZeneca reports receiving funding from the NIH and the US Food and Drug Administration and receiving personal fees from the American Heart Association. CWY reports that his spouse is employed by Abbott Labs. MV has received research grant support, served on advisory boards or had speaker engagements with American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Baxter Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cytokinetics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health and participates on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Galmed, Novartis, Bayer AG, Occlutech, and Impulse Dynamics. All other authors report no disclosures relevant to the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Little is known about the bleeding risk associated with cangrelor use in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who are exposed to an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor before coronary angiography., Methods: Cangrelor in Acute MI: Effectiveness and Outcomes (CAMEO) is an observational registry studying platelet inhibition for patients with MI. Upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibition was defined as receipt of an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor within 24 hours before hospitalization or in-hospital before angiography. Among cangrelor-treated patients, we compared bleeding after cangrelor use through 7 days postdischarge between patients with and without upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitor exposure., Results: Among 1802 cangrelor-treated patients with MI, 385 (21.4%) received upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitor treatment. Of these, 101 patients (33.8%) started cangrelor within 1 hour, 103 (34.4%) between 1 and 3 hours, and 95 (31.8%), >3 hours after in-hospital oral P2Y 12 inhibitor administration; the remaining received an oral P2Y 12 inhibitor before hospitalization. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of bleeding among cangrelor-treated patients with and without upstream oral P2Y 12 inhibitor exposure (6.5% vs 8.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-1.01). Bleeding was observed in 5.0%, 10.7%, and 3.2% of patients treated with cangrelor <1, 1 to 3, and >3 hours after the last oral PY 12 inhibitor dose, respectively; bleeding rates were not statistically different between groups (1-3 hours vs <1 hour: adjusted OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 0.87-8.32; >3 hours vs <1 hour: adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.15-2.85)., Conclusions: Bleeding risk was not observed to be significantly higher after cangrelor treatment in patients with and without upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor exposure., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Objective: We aimed to characterize the association of hospital procedural volumes with outcomes among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT)., Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using data prospectively collected from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 in the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke registry. Participants were derived from a cohort of 60,727 AIS patients treated with EVT within 24 hours at 626 hospitals. The primary cohort excluded patients with pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) < 6, onset-to-treatment time > 6 hours, and interhospital transfers. There were 2 secondary cohorts: (1) the EVT metrics cohort excluded patients with missing data on time from door to arterial puncture and (2) the intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) metrics cohort only included patients receiving IVT ≤4.5 hours after onset., Results: The primary cohort (mean ± standard deviation age = 70.7 ± 14.8 years; 51.2% female; median [interquartile range] baseline NIHSS = 18.0 [13-22]; IVT use, 70.2%) comprised 21,209 patients across 595 hospitals. The EVT metrics cohort and IVT metrics cohort comprised 47,262 and 16,889 patients across 408 and 601 hospitals, respectively. Higher procedural volumes were significantly associated with higher odds (expressed as adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for every 10-case increase in volume) of discharge to home (1.03 [1.02-1.04]), functional independence at discharge (1.02 [1.01-1.04]), and lower rates of in-hospital mortality (0.96 [0.95-0.98]). All secondary measures were also associated with procedural volumes., Interpretation: Among AIS patients primarily presenting to EVT-capable hospitals (excluding those transferred from one facility to another and those suffering in-hospital strokes), EVT at hospitals with higher procedural volumes was associated with faster treatment times, better discharge outcomes, and lower rates of in-hospital mortality. ANN NEUROL 2023., (© 2023 American Neurological Association.)

Aims: Sex differences in long-term outcomes following hospitalization for heart failure (HF) across ejection fraction (EF) subtypes are not well described. In this study, we evaluated the risk of mortality and rehospitalization among males and females across the spectrum of EF over 5 years of follow-up following an index HF hospitalization event., Methods and Results: Patients hospitalized with HF between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2014 from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry with available 5-year follow-up using Medicare Part A claims data were included. The association between sex and risk of mortality and readmission over a 5-year follow-up period for each HF subtype (HF with reduced EF [HFrEF, EF ≤40%], HF with mildly reduced EF [HFmrEF, EF 41-49%], and HF with preserved EF [HFpEF, EF >50%]) was assessed using adjusted Cox models. The effect modification by the HF subtype for the association between sex and outcomes was assessed by including multiplicative interaction terms in the models. A total of 155 670 patients (median age: 81 years, 53.4% female) were included. Over 5-year follow-up, males and females had comparably poor survival post-discharge; however, females (vs. males) had greater years of survival lost to HF compared with the median age- and sex-matched US population (HFpEF: 17.0 vs. 14.6 years; HFrEF: 17.3 vs. 15.1 years; HFmrEF: 17.7 vs. 14.6 years for age group 65-69 years). In adjusted analysis, females (vs. males) had a lower risk of 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.90, p < 0.0001), and the risk difference was most pronounced among patients with HFrEF (aHR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89; p interaction [sex*HF subtype] = 0.04). Females (vs. males) had a higher adjusted risk of HF readmission over 5-year follow-up (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08, p < 0.0001), with the risk difference most pronounced among patients with HFpEF (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.14; p interaction [sex*HF subtype] = 0.001)., Conclusions: While females (vs. males) had lower adjusted mortality, females experienced a significantly greater loss in survival time than the median age- and sex-matched US population and had a greater risk of rehospitalization over 5 years following HF hospitalization., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Coverage for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was expanded in 2014, but contemporary referral and participation rates remain unknown., Methods: Patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (≤35%) in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from 2010 to 2020 were included, and CR referral status was described as yes, no, or not captured. Temporal trends in CR referral were assessed in the overall cohort. Patient and hospital-level predictors of CR referral were assessed using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. Additionally, CR referral and proportional utilization of CR within 1-year of referral were evaluated among patients aged >65 years with available Medicare administrative claims data who were clinically stable for 6-weeks postdischarge. Finally, the association of CR referral with the risk of 1-year death and readmission was evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox models., Results: Of 69,441 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were eligible for CR (median age 67 years; 33% women; 30% Black), 17,076 (24.6%) were referred to CR, and referral rates increased from 8.1% in 2010 to 24.1% in 2020 ( P trend <0.001). Of 8310 patients with Medicare who remained clinically stable 6-weeks after discharge, the CR referral rate was 25.8%, and utilization of CR among referred patients was 4.1% (mean sessions attended: 6.7). Patients not referred were more likely to be older, of Black race, and with a higher burden of comorbidities. In adjusted analysis, eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were referred to CR (versus not referred) had a lower risk of 1-year death (hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.70-1.00]; P =0.049) without significant differences in 1-year readmission., Conclusions: CR referral rates have increased from 2010 to 2020. However, only 1 in 4 patients are referred to CR. Among eligible patients who received CR referral, participation was low, with <1 of 20 participating in CR., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association ([AHA] 929502), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck & Co Inc, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; serves as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co Inc, PhamaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Health, Urovant Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor; and has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr DeVore reports research funding through his institution from the AHA, Biofourmis, Bodyport, Cytokinetics, American Regent Inc, the NHLBI, Novartis, and Story Health. He also provides consulting services for and/or receives honoraria from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Cardionomic, InnaMed, LivaNova, Natera, Novartis, Procyrion, Story Health, Vifor, and Zoll. He has also received nonfinancial support from Abbott for educational and research activities. Dr Allen has received grant funding from National Institutes of Health, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Agency for Health Resource and Quality, and AHA; and consultant fees from ACI Clinical, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, and Novartis. Dr Fonarow reports consulting for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Edwards, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr Pandey has received research funding from the Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholarship, Gilead Sciences Research Scholar Program, Applied Therapeutics (investigator-initiated grant), and National Institute of Aging (GEMSSTAR grant 1R03AG067960-01); and serves on the advisory board of Roche Diagnostics. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Existing data and clinical trials could not determine whether faster intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) translates into better long-term functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke among those treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Patient-level national data can provide the required large population to study the associations between earlier IVT, versus later, with longitudinal functional outcomes and mortality in patients receiving IVT+EVT combined treatment., Methods: This cohort study included older US patients (age ≥65 years) who received IVT within 4.5 hours or EVT within 7 hours after acute ischemic stroke using the linked 2015 to 2018 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke and Medicare database (38 913 treated with IVT only and 3946 with IVT+EVT). Primary outcome was home time, a patient-prioritized functional outcome. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality in 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between door-to-needle (DTN) times and outcomes., Results: Among patients treated with IVT+EVT, after adjusting for patient and hospital factors, including onset-to-EVT times, each 15-minute increase in DTN times for IVT was associated with significantly higher odds of zero home time in a year (never discharged to home) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.19]), less home time among those discharged to home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 per 1% of 365 days [95% CI, 0.89-0.98]), and higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]). These associations were also statistically significant among patients treated with IVT but at a modest degree (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04 for zero home time, 0.96 per 1% home time for those discharged to home, and adjusted hazard ratio 1.03 for mortality). In the secondary analysis where the IVT+EVT group was compared with 3704 patients treated with EVT only, shorter DTN times (≤60, 45, and 30 minutes) achieved incrementally more home time in a year, and more modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2 at discharge (22.3%, 23.4%, and 25.0%, respectively) versus EVT only (16.4%, P <0.001 for each). The benefit dissipated with DTN>60 minutes., Conclusions: Among older patients with stroke treated with either IVT only or IVT+EVT, shorter DTN times are associated with better long-term functional outcomes and lower mortality. These findings support further efforts to accelerate thrombolytic administration in all eligible patients, including EVT candidates., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Mac Grory received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; K23HL161426). Dr Uchino reported being on the data safety monitoring board for clinical trials sponsored by Genentech, Inc. and Evaheart, Inc. He is a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Dr Saver reported receiving research support from the National Institute of Health and the American Heart Association; receiving contracted hourly payments from Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus, and Boehringer Ingelheim (prevention only) and stock options from Rapid Medical for service on clinical trial steering committees advising on rigorous trial design and conduct; an employee of the University of California which holds a patent on an endovascular device for stroke. Dr Xian reported receiving research funding from the American Heart Association and Genentech and honoraria from Boeheim Ingelheim. Dr Bhatt disclosed the following relationships: Advisory Board: AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, Stasys; Board of Directors: AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Consultant: Broadview Ventures; Data Monitoring Committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial (Portico Re-sheathable Transcatheter Aortic Valve System IDE), funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial [PEITHO Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis Study]), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial [CENTERA THV System in Intermediate Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic, Severe, Calcific, Aortic Stenosis], funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2 [Protection Against Emboli During Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Neuroguard IEP System]), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial [Edoxaban Compared to Standard Care After Heart Valve Replacement Using a Catheter in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation], funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial [Randomized Comparison of Abluminus DES+ Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Global], funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT trial [Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion]); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial [Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs. Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting] steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II [Study to Investigate CSL112 in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome] executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial [A Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease], funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies] operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; neither I nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receive any income from this patent.) Research Funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, 89Bio; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, Vascular Solutions; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Takeda. Dr Schwamm reported serving on the American Heart Association/Get With The Guidelines stroke systems of care advisory group and American Stroke Association Advisory Committee; stroke systems consultant to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health; scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct to Genentech (late window thrombolysis, member of steering committee TIMELESS [Tenecteplase in Stroke Patients Between 4.5 and 24 Hours; NCT03785678]); member of a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for Penumbra (MIND [MIND: Artemis in the Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage; NCT03342664]); Diffusion Pharma (PHAST-TSC [Efficacy and Safety of Trans Sodium Crocetinate (TSC) for Treatment of Suspected Stroke; NCT03763929]); National principal investigator (PI) or member of National Steering Committee for Medtronic (Stroke AF [Rate of Atrial Fibrillation Through 12 Months in Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke of Presumed Known Origin; NCT02700945]); PI, StrokeNet Network National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; New England Regional Coordinating Center U24NS107243); Co-I, The Impact of Telestroke on Patterns of Care and Long-Term Outcomes, NINDS (R01NS111952). Dr Hussain reported serving on the scientific advisory board and clinical events committee of Cerenovus, the principal investigator of Medtronic Core laboratory, data safety monitoring board for Stryker Neurovascular, and clinical events committee of Rapid Medical. Dr Fonarow reported receiving research support from the Patient Centered Outcome Research Institute and the National Institutes of Health, and employee of University of California which holds a patent on an endovascular device for stroke. Drs Man, Solomon, Alhanti, and Smith reported no relevant disclosure.

Background Many patients with heart failure (HF) have severely reduced ejection fraction but do not meet threshold for consideration of advanced therapies (ie, stage D HF). The clinical profile and health care costs associated with these patients in US practice is not well described. Methods and Results We examined patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ≤40% from 2014 to 2019 in the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) registry, who did not receive advanced HF therapies or have end-stage kidney disease. Patients with severely reduced EF defined as EF ≤30% were compared with those with EF 31% to 40% in terms of clinical profile and guideline-directed medical therapy. Among Medicare beneficiaries, postdischarge outcomes and health care expenditure were compared. Among 113 348 patients with EF ≤40%, 69% (78 589) had an EF ≤30%. Patients with severely reduced EF ≤30% tended to be younger and were more likely to be Black. Patients with EF ≤30% also tended to have fewer comorbidities and were more likely to be prescribed guideline-directed medical therapy ("triple therapy" 28.3% versus 18.2%, P <0.001). At 12-months postdischarge, patients with EF ≤30% had significantly higher risk of death (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.08-1.18]) and HF hospitalization (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.09-1.19]), with similar risk of all-cause hospitalizations. Health care expenditures were numerically higher for patients with EF ≤30% (median US$22 648 versus $21 392, P =0.11). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in US clinical practice, most patients have severely reduced EF ≤30%. Despite younger age and modestly higher use of guideline-directed medical therapy at discharge, patients with severely reduced EF face heightened postdischarge risk of death and HF hospitalization.

Background: Heuristic biases are increasingly recognized, and potentially modifiable, contributors to patient care and outcomes. Left digit bias is a cognitive bias where continuous variables are categorized by their left-most digit. The impact of this heuristic bias applied to patient age on quality of care in heart failure has not been explored., Methods: We examined participants admitted from 2005 to 2021 in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry. To create 2 naturally randomized groups, isolating the effect of left digit bias, we dichotomized patients into those discharged within 60 days prior to their 80th birthday (N=4238) and those discharged within 60 days after their 80th birthday (N=4329). We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between discharge date relative to 80th birthday and several in-hospital quality metrics and in-hospital outcomes. Among Medicare participants (N=2759), we performed adjusted Cox regression to analyze the relationship between discharge date and risk of 1-year mortality or readmission., Results: Among 8567 patients, 50.4% were female, 73% were non-Hispanic White, and 42.9% had an ejection fraction ≤40%. Discharge date relative to 80th birthday was not associated with numerous in-hospital quality metrics or in-hospital outcomes on unadjusted or adjusted logistic regression. Among Medicare beneficiaries, there was no association between discharge date and risk of mortality or readmission at 1-year postdischarge (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.95-1.12]; P =0.52)., Conclusions: In a large registry of patients hospitalized for heart failure, we did not detect a left digit bias' with respect to age at discharge, which resulted in differential quality of care or outcomes.

Background: In January 2021, vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization among patients with a recent worsening HF event based on the VICTORIA (VerICiguaT Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial., Objectives: This study sought to leverage a contemporary U.S. registry of patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) to characterize patients who may be candidates for vericiguat based on FDA label and the VICTORIA trial eligibility criteria., Methods: The authors studied patients hospitalized for HF with ejection fraction (EF) <45% across 525 sites in the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) registry between January 2014 and December 2020. Approximate FDA label criteria (excluding estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , dialysis, or patients with heart transplantation or durable mechanical circulatory support) and eligibility criteria for the VICTORIA trial were applied to the GWTG-HF cohort., Results: Among 241,057 patients with EF <45% in the GWTG-HF registry, 221,730 (92%) could be candidates for vericiguat under the FDA label and 92,249 (38%) would have been eligible for the VICTORIA trial. The most frequent reasons for ineligibility for the FDA label were eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (5.7%) and dialysis (1.6%). Although there were greater proportions of women and Black patients in the GWTG-HF registry, most clinical characteristics were qualitatively similar with patients enrolled in the VICTORIA trial. Among Medicare beneficiaries in the GWTG-HF registry eligible for vericiguat by either FDA label or VICTORIA trial criteria, 12-month postdischarge rates of mortality (36%-37%), HF hospitalization (33%-35%), all-cause hospitalization (64%-66%), and mean health care expenditure (U.S. $25,106-$25,428) were high., Conclusions: Data from a large, contemporary U.S. registry of patients actively hospitalized for HF with EF <45% suggest that approximately 4 in 10 patients meet the criteria of the VICTORIA trial and that more than 9 in 10 patients are potential candidates for vericiguat based on the FDA label. Contemporary Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF with EF <45% and eligible for vericiguat face high rates of postdischarge mortality and readmission and accrue substantial health care costs., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc (Rahway, New Jersey, USA). The Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program is provided by the American Heart Association and sponsored, in part, by Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Diabetes Alliance, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Bayer. Dr Fonarow has served as a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc), and Novartis. Drs Lautsch and Hilkert are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc. Dr Allen has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; and has received consulting fees from ACI Clinical, American Heart Association, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and UpToDate. Dr Albert has received grant support from Novartis and AstraZeneca; and consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Cytokinetics, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc). Dr Butler has served as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Arena Pharma, Array, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Eli Lilly, G3 Pharma, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sequana Medical, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association (#929502), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc), Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; served on the advisory board for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, scPharmaceuticals, and Sanofi; and served as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Vifor, Corteria Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc), PharmaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Health, and Urovant Pharmaceuticals; and has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Cytokinetics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), few data are available evaluating AF-specific care patterns and post-discharge outcomes in patients hospitalized for HFpEF. We evaluated AF-specific medical therapies and post-discharge outcomes among patients hospitalized for heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or HFpEF by AF history., Methods and Results: Trends in AF prevalence were evaluated among patients hospitalized for HFmrEF or HFpEF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry from 2014 to 2020. Among those with linked Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services post-discharge data, we assessed associations of AF with 12-month outcomes and determined trends in post-discharge prescriptions. Among 429 464 patients (median age 76 years [interquartile range 65-85], 57% women), 216 486 (50%) had a history of AF. Over time, the proportion of patients with AF increased slightly. Among the 79 895 patients with post-discharge data, AF was independently associated with higher risk of mortality and all-cause readmissions at 12 months, with stronger associations in HFpEF than in HFmrEF (mortality hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.16 vs. HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.10; p interaction  = 0.009). Anti-arrhythmic drug use after heart failure hospitalization was low (18%) and increased modestly over time. Amiodarone accounted for 71% of total anti-arrhythmic drug prescriptions. Overall use of anticoagulants after heart failure hospitalization has significantly increased from 52% in 2014 to 61% in 2019, but remained modest., Conclusion: Prevalence of AF is rising among patients hospitalized with HFpEF. Those with comorbid AF face elevated post-discharge risks of death and rehospitalization. Current use of pharmacological rhythm control is low., (© 2022 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Alignment between clinician-reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) class compared and patient-reported outcomes among patients hospitalized for heart failure is unclear., Methods: ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) was a global randomized trial comparing nesiritide versus placebo among patients hospitalized for heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction. Among patients with complete baseline data for NYHA class and the patient-reported EuroQOL-5 dimensions ([EQ-5D], both utility index and visual analog scale), levels of each scale were mapped across 4 prespecified categories "best" to "worst." Minor and moderate-severe discordance were defined as NYHA class and EQ-5D differing by 1 level and ≥2 levels, respectively. Multivariable models assessed factors independently associated with moderate-severe discordance, and associations between discordance and clinical outcomes., Results: Among 5741 patients, concordance, minor discordance, and moderate-severe discordance between NYHA class and EQ-5D utility index occurred in 22%, 40%, and 38% of patients, respectively. For NYHA class and EQ-5D visual analog scale, this categorization occurred in 29%, 48%, and 23%. Discordance was more often due to disproportionately higher EQ-5D score (78% of discordance cases with utility index, and 70% with visual analog scale). NYHA class IV, higher EQ-5D scores, race, and geographic region were among patient factors independently associated with moderate-severe discordance. Magnitude of discordance was not associated with clinical outcomes; however, EQ-5D utility index disproportionately worse than NYHA class was associated with increased 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.27 [95% CI, 1.01-1.60]; P =0.04)., Conclusions: In a global trial cohort of patients hospitalized for heart failure, the majority of patients exhibited discordance between clinician-reported NYHA class and patient-reported health status. Multiple patient factors were independently associated with moderate-severe discordance, and patients who perceived their health status as worse than the clinician's perception had higher mortality. Registration: URL: http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00475852.

Background: Differences between patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) vs HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) are not well-characterized, particularly as pertains to in-hospital decongestion and longitudinal patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this analysis was to compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between patients hospitalized with HFrEF vs HFpEF., Methods and Results: The Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) trial enrolled 7141 patients hospitalized for HF with reduced or preserved EF. We assessed the association between an EF ≤ 40% vs an EF >40% with in-hospital decongestion, risk of rehospitalization and mortality, and quality of life as measured by the EuroQOL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Among 5800 patients (81%) with complete EF data, 4782 (82%) had an EF ≤40% and 1018 (18%) had an EF >40%. Both groups demonstrated similar rates of decongestion by weight change and urine volume through 24 hours, a similar risk of 30-day mortality and HF rehospitalization, and a similar 180-day mortality. Patients with HFpEF had worse EQ-5D scores at hour 24 (median 0.76, [interquartile range (IQR) 0.51-0.84] vs 0.78 [IQR 0.57-0.84]; P = .01) that persisted through discharge (0.81 [IQR 0.69-0.86] vs 0.83 [IQR 0.71-1.00]; P < .001) and the 30-day follow-up (0.78 [IQR 0.60-0.85] vs 0.83 [IQR 0.71-1.00]; P < .001). After adjustment, these differences were attenuated and not statistically significant., Conclusions: In this large, multinational cohort of patients hospitalized for HF, patients with an EF ≤ 40% vs an EF >40% experienced similar in-hospital decongestion and postdischarge clinical outcomes. Patients with an EF >40% reported worse in-hospital and postdischarge patient-reported health status, but these measures were similar to HFrEF after accounting for other clinical factors., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Peters and Dr Harrington are supported by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (T32HL069749). Dr Mentz has received research support and honoraria from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/Eli Lilly, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Fast BioMedical, Gilead, Innolife, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Relypsa, Respicardia, Roche, Sanofi, Vifor, Windtree Therapeutics, and Zoll. Dr Fudim was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL151744), the American Heart Association (20IPA35310955), Mario Family Award, Duke Chair's Award, Translating Duke Health Award, Bayer, Bodyport, and BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals; and receives consulting fees from Abbott, Audicor, AxonTherapies, Bodyguide, Bodyport, Boston Scientific, CVRx, Daxor, Edwards LifeSciences, Feldschuh Foundation, Fire1, Gradient, Intershunt, NXT Biomedical, Pharmacosmos, PreHealth, Shifamed, Splendo, Vironix, Viscardia, and Zoll. Dr. Butler serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, American Regent, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Roche, and Vifor. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair's Research Award, the American Heart Association (#929502), Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and serves as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, PhamaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Heatlh, Urovant Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor. All other authors report no disclosures., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To develop and validate a model to predict obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using only information available at the time of admission for labour., Design: A clinical predictive model using a retrospective cohort., Setting: A US health system containing one community and one tertiary hospital., Sample: A total of 22 873 pregnancy episodes with in-hospital delivery at or beyond 21 weeks of gestation., Methods: Thirty antepartum risk factors were identified as candidate variables, and a prediction model was built using logistic regression predicting OASIS versus no OASIS. Models were fit using the overall study population and separately using hospital-specific cohorts. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation and external cross-validation was performed between the two hospital cohorts., Main Outcome Measures: Model performance was estimated using the bias-corrected concordance index (c-index), calibration plots and decision curves., Results: Fifteen risk factors were retained in the final model. Decreasing parity, previous caesarean birth and cardiovascular disease increased risk of OASIS, whereas tobacco use and black race decreased risk. The final model from the total study population had good discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.78) and was able to accurately predict risks between 0 and 35%, where average risk for OASIS was 3%. The site-specific model fit using patients only from the tertiary hospital had c-stat 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.77) on community hospital patients, and the community hospital model was 0.77 (95%CI 0.76-0.80) on the tertiary hospital patients., Conclusions: OASIS can be accurately predicted based on variables known at the time of admission for labour. These predictions could be useful for selectively implementing OASIS prevention strategies., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend titration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and beta-blockers among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to maximally tolerated doses. Patient characteristics associated with dose titration and clinical outcomes subsequent to dose titration remain poorly characterized., Methods: Among 1999 ambulatory patients with chronic HFrEF in the HF-ACTION trial, use and dosing of ACEi and evidence-based beta-blockers were examined at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with dose escalation (medication initation or dosing increase) or dose de-escalation (medication discontinuation or dosing decrease). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine associations between dose trajectory group (stable target, stable sub-target, dose escalation, and dose de-escalation) and subsequent mortality and hospitalization outcomes., Results: For both ACEi and beta-blockers, hospitalization for heart failure in the 6 months prior to enrollment (odds ratio [OR] 2.32 [95% confidence interval 1.58-3.42]) for ACEi; 1.42 [1.05-1.9] for beta-blockers) and higher systolic blood pressure (OR 1.01 [1.00-1.03] per 1 mmHg increase for ACEi; 1.01 [1.00-1.02] for beta-blockers) were associated with dose escalation. Hospitalization 6 months prior to enrollment for any cause (including HF or non-HF causes) was associated with dose de-escalation (OR 1.60 [1.14-2.25] for ACEi; 1.67 [1.20-2.33] for beta-blockers). After adjustment for patient characteristics, compared with stable target dosing, dose de-escalation of either medication was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.64 [1.11-2.42] for ACEi; 1.62 [1.04-2.53] for beta-blockers). Compared with stable target dosing, both dose de-escalation (aHR 1.98 [1.36-2.87]) and stable sub-target dosing (aHR 1.49 [1.18-1.87]) of beta-blockers were associated with greater cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for heart failure., Conclusions: Among outpatients with chronic HFrEF, patient characteristics including recent hospitalization status and blood pressure were associated with odds of subsequent escalation and de-escalation of ACEi and beta-blocker therapy. Compared with patients receiving guildeline-recommended target doses, dose de-escalation of either medication and sub-target dosing of beta-blockers were associated with greater morbidity and mortality over long-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guidelines for evaluating patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) recommend pretest probability (PTP) estimation but provide no clear recommendations regarding diagnostic testing in patients with >5% to 15% risk of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic and prognostic value of PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) minimal risk score (PMRS) calculation in this patient group is unknown., Objectives: This work aims to improve the evaluation of stable patients with suspected CAD by using the PMRS, which identifies patients at minimal risk of CAD and events in patients with >5% to 15% PTP of obstructive CAD., Methods: Greater than 5% to 15% PTP patients from 2 large clinical trials were used for subcohort derivation: PROMISE (N = 10,003) and Dan-NICAD (Danish study of Non-Invasive Testing in Coronary Artery Disease) (N = 3,252). First, the PMRS cutoff associated with a prevalence of obstructive CAD ≤5% was determined in the >5% to 15% PTP PROMISE core lab computed tomographic angiography patients (discovery cohort: n = 2,191). This cutoff was validated for obstructive CAD in >5% to 15% PTP Dan-NICAD patients (CAD validation cohort: n = 1,386) and for prognostic impact on death and myocardial infarction in >5% to 15% PTP PROMISE non-core lab computed tomographic angiography patients (prognosis validation cohort: n = 2,753)., Results: In the discovery cohort, a CAD prevalence of ≤5% was found at a PMRS of ≥34%. In the CAD validation cohort, this cutoff down-classified 442 (31.9%) of >5% to 15% PTP patients into the low PTP group (CAD ≤5%); the prevalence of obstructive CAD in down-classified patients was 3.2% compared to 7.1% in non-down-classified patients. A PMRS ≥34% was nonsignificantly associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction and death in the prognosis validation cohort (HR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.29-1.18]; P = 0.13)., Conclusions: For evaluating patients with suspected CAD, a combined use of traditional PTP and the PMRS correctly down-classified one-third of >5% to 15% PTP patients into a group with very low prevalence of obstructive CAD and adverse events. The proposed strategy may improve risk stratification and help reduce unneeded diagnostic testing., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was supported by The Danish Heart Foundation (Grant No. 15-R99-A5837-22920), the Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region, and Aarhus University Research foundation. The PROMISE trial was supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098237, R01HL098236, R01HL098305 and R01HL098235). Dr Fordyce has received consulting fees from Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Amgen; and has received research grants from Bayer outside of this work. Dr Bøttcher has been a member of the advisory board and has had research collaboration with Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, BMS-Pfizer, and Acarix outside of this work. Dr Douglas has received research funding from HeartFlow outside of this work. Dr Winther has received support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Clinical Emerging Investigator grant (NNF21OC0066981). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This research evaluates whether environmental exposures (pesticides and smoke) influence respiratory and allergic outcomes in women living in a tropical, agricultural environment., Methods: We used data from 266 mothers from the Infants' Environmental Health cohort study in Costa Rica. We evaluated environmental exposures in women by measuring seven pesticide and two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons metabolites in urine samples. We defined 'high exposure' as having a metabolite value in the top 75th percentile. We collected survey data on respiratory and allergic outcomes in mothers as well as on pesticides and other environmental exposures. Using logistic regression models adjusted for obesity, we assessed the associations of pesticide exposure with multiple outcomes (wheeze, doctor-diagnosed asthma, high (≥2) asthma score based on symptoms, rhinitis, eczema and itchy rash)., Results: Current pesticide use in the home was positively associated with diagnosed asthma (OR=1.99 (95% CI=1.05 to 3.87)). High urinary levels of 5-hydroxythiabendazole (thiabendazole metabolite) and living in a neighbourhood with frequent smoke from waste burning were associated with a high asthma score (OR=1.84 (95%CI=1.05 to 3.25) and OR=2.31 (95%CI=1.11 to 5.16), respectively). Women who worked in agriculture had a significantly lower prevalence of rhinitis (0.19 (0.01 to 0.93)), but were more likely to report eczema (OR=2.54 (95%CI=1.33 to 4.89)) and an itchy rash (OR=3.17 (95%CI=1.24 to 7.73))., Conclusions: While limited by sample size, these findings suggest that environmental exposure to both pesticides and smoke may impact respiratory and skin-related allergic outcomes in women., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aims: To assess heart failure (HF) in-hospital quality of care and outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods and Results: Patients hospitalized for HF with ejection fraction (EF) <40% in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines©-HF (GWTG-HF) registry during the COVID-19 pandemic (3/1/2020-4/1/2021) and pre-pandemic (2/1/2019-2/29/2020) periods were included. Adherence to HF process of care measures, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS) were compared in pre-pandemic vs. pandemic periods and in patients with vs. without COVID-19. Overall, 42 004 pre-pandemic and 37 027 pandemic period patients (median age 68, 33% women, 58% White) were included without observed differences across clinical characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, or EF. Utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy at discharge was comparable across both periods, with rates of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement or prescription lower during the pandemic (vs. pre-pandemic period). In-hospital mortality (3.0% vs. 2.5%, p <0.0001) and LOS (mean 5.7 vs. 5.4 days, p <0.0004) were higher during the pandemic vs. pre-pandemic. The highest in-hospital mortality during the pandemic was observed among patients hospitalized in the Northeast region (3.4%). Among patients concurrently diagnosed with COVID-19 (n = 549; 1.5%), adherence to ICD placement or prescription, prescription of aldosterone antagonist or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor at discharge were lower, and in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs. 3.0%, p <0.0001) and LOS (mean 7.7 vs. 5.7 days, p <0.0001) were higher than those without COVID-19., Conclusion: Among GWTG-HF participating hospitals, patients hospitalized for HF with reduced EF during the pandemic received similar care quality but experienced higher in-hospital mortality than the pre-pandemic period., (© 2022 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Worsening heart failure (HF) often requires hospitalization but in some cases may be managed in the outpatient or emergency department (ED) settings. The predictors and clinical significance of ED visits without admission vs hospitalization are unclear., Methods: The ASCEND-HF trial included 2661 US patients hospitalized for HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with a subsequent all-cause ED visit (with ED discharge) within 30 days vs all-cause readmission within 30 days. Factors associated with each type of care were assessed in multivariable models. Multivariable models landmarked at 30 days evaluated associations between each type of care and subsequent 150-day mortality., Results: Through 30-day follow-up, 193 patients (7%) had ED discharge, 459 (17%) had readmission, and 2009 (76%) had neither urgent visit. Patients with ED discharge vs readmission were similar with respect to age, sex, systolic blood pressure, ejection fraction, and coronary artery disease, whereas ED discharge patients had a modestly lower creatinine (P < .01). Among patients with either event within 30 days, a higher creatinine and prior HF hospitalization were associated with a higher likelihood of readmission, as compared with ED discharge (P < .02). Landmarked at 30 days, rates of death during the subsequent 150 days were 21.0% for patients who were readmitted and 11.4% for patients discharged from the ED. Compared with patients who were readmitted, ED discharge was independently associated with lower 150-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.92, P = .02)., Conclusions: In this cohort of US patients hospitalized for HF, worse renal function and prior HF hospitalization were associated with a higher likelihood of early postdischarge readmission, as compared with ED discharge. Although subsequent mortality was high after discharge from the ED, this risk of mortality was significantly lower than patients who were readmitted to the hospital., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate informal physician judgement versus pretest probability scores in estimating risk in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods: We included 4533 patients from the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Physicians categorised a priori the pretest probability of obstructive CAD (≥70% or ≥50% left main); Diamond-Forrester (D-F) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) pretest probability estimates were calculated. Agreement was calculated using the κ statistic; logistic regression evaluated estimates of pretest CAD probability and actual CAD (as determined by CT coronary angiography), and clinical outcomes were modelled using Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Physician estimates agreed poorly with D-F (κ 0.16; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.18) and ESC (κ 0.04; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.05). Actual obstructive CAD was significantly more prevalent in both the high-likelihood (OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.30 to 4.74) and the intermediate-likelihood (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.76) physician-estimated groups versus the low-likelihood group; ESC similarly differentiated between the three groups (OR 9.07; 95% CI 2.87 to 28.70; and OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.22 to 12.28). However, using D-F, only the high-probability group differed (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.54). Only physician estimates were associated with a higher incidence of adjusted death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalisation in the high-probability versus low-probability group (HR 2.68; 95% CI 1.52 to 4.74); neither pretest probability score provided prognostic information., Conclusions: Compared with D-F and ESC estimates, physician judgement more accurately identified obstructive CAD and worse patient outcomes. Integrating physician judgement may improve risk prediction for patients with stable chest pain., Trial Registration Number: NCT01174550., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CBF: Consulting fees/honoraria from Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer; research support from Bayer; Steering Committee service for HeartFlow. DM: Consultant fees/honoraria from Medtronic; research support from AGA Medical, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Merck & Co., Inc. UH: Research support from HeartFlow. MRP: Consultant fees/honoraria from Bayer Healthcare, Genzyme, Medscape - theheart.org, Merck; research support from AHRQ, AstraZeneca, Jansen, Johnson & Johnson, Maquet, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, PCORI. PD: Research support from HeartFlow. No other disclosures were reported., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Patients evaluated for coronary artery disease have a range of symptoms and underlying risk. The relationships between patient-described symptoms, clinician conclusions, and subsequent clinical management and outcomes remain incompletely described., Methods: In this secondary analysis, we examined the association between 4 types of presenting symptoms (substernal/left-sided chest pain, other chest/neck/arm pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms) and patient risk, noninvasive test results, clinical management, and outcomes for stable outpatients randomized in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate differences in noninvasive test result, all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction by symptom type., Results: Among 9996 patients, most presented with chest pain (47.2% substernal, 29.2% other), followed by dyspnea (14.9%), and other symptoms (8.7%). Patients with dyspnea were older (median age 63 versus 60, P ≤0.02) with higher baseline risk (78.2% with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease >7.5% versus 67.6%, P ≤0.02). Using patients with substernal chest pain as a reference, there was no difference in noninvasive test positivity across symptom groups (all P >0.05), but test-positive patients with dyspnea (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85]) or other symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.90]) were less likely to be referred for cardiac catheterization. While symptom type alone was not associated with outcomes, symptom presentation with chest pain or dyspnea did modify the association between a positive noninvasive test and clinical outcome (interaction P =0.025 for both all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/MI)., Conclusions: Among low-risk outpatients evaluated for coronary artery disease, typicality of symptoms was not closely associated with higher baseline risk but was related to differences in processes of care and the prognostic value of a positive test. Adverse events were not associated with clinician risk estimates or symptoms alone. These unexpected findings highlight the limitation of relying solely on symptom presentation or clinician risk estimation to evaluate patients for suspected coronary artery disease., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

Background: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating condition without definitive evidence to guide treatment. Whereas the association between faster treatment times with endovascular therapy (EVT) and better outcomes in anterior circulation is well established, whether this relationship exists for patients with BAO is not well delineated., Methods: We used individual-level patient data from the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke nationwide US registry prospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2019. We identified individuals with BAO treated with EVT within 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary outcomes examined were in-hospital mortality, discharge home, ambulatory at discharge, independent at discharge (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2), substantial reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b or 3), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between time from symptom onset to treatment with EVT and outcomes., Results: Among 3015 patients with BAO treated with EVT, the mean age was 65.9 years, 38.8% were women, and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at presentation was 17 (interquartile range, 8-26). Median onset to EVT time was 406 minutes (interquartile range, 252-688). From 2015 to 2019, there was an overall increase in the median onset to EVT times (380-411 minutes; P =0.016) but no significant change in the proportion of patients treated within 6 hours of symptom onset (48.4%-44.0%; P =0.17). After risk adjustment for patient and hospital-level factors, there were significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.45-0.68]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.84]) and significantly higher odds of ambulation at discharge (aOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.37-2.16]), discharge home (aOR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.73-2.77]), and independence at discharge (aOR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.66-2.95]) when onset to EVT time was ≤6 hours compared with >6 hours. The fastest decay in good outcomes per hour occurred within 6 hours of symptom onset., Conclusions: Among patients receiving EVT for BAO, faster treatment from symptom onset was associated with improved outcomes. These findings support efforts to achieve rapid treatment with EVT for patients with BAO.

Background: Non-coronary vascular disease (NCVD) is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Little is known about physician risk assessment, prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiac catheterization, and the performance of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score in patients with NCVD., Methods: Retrospective analysis of outpatients with angina and no known CAD from the PROMISE trial. NCVD included carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, or history of stroke or peripheral artery disease. Multivariable models of physician estimates of the probability of obstructive CAD, prevalence of non-obstructive and obstructive CAD, referral to cardiac catheterization, and all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina were performed., Results: Among 10,001 patients in the PROMISE trial, 379 (3.8%) patients had NCVD. Only 8.5% of participants with NCVD were categorized as high-risk for obstructive CAD by physicians, though 15.5% (25/161) had obstructive CAD in those randomized to coronary computed tomography (CTA). NCVD was independently associated with non-obstructive (aOR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.18-2.61; P = .006) but not obstructive CAD by CTA. Adjusted referral to cardiac catheterization was similar with and without NCVD (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.88-1.94, P = .19). NCVD was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death/MI/UA (aOR 2.03; 95% CI 1.37-3.01, P < .001). There was no interaction between NCVD status and ASCVD risk score., Conclusions: Among patients with NCVD and angina, NCVD had increased adjusted risks of CAD and adverse outcomes which were not well described by ASCVD risk score and were underrecognized by physicians. Increased awareness and better risk stratification tools for patients with NCVD may be necessary to recognize the associated CV risk and optimize diagnostic testing and therapies., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Purpose: Patients with prestroke mobility impairment (PSMI) were excluded from endovascular clinical trials. There are limited data regarding safety and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in this population. We used a large, national data set (Get With The Guidelines–Stroke) to evaluate the safety and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with PSMI., Methods: We included patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke registry between 2015 and 2019. PSMI was defined as the inability to ambulate independently. Generalized estimating equations for logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between PSMI and outcomes., Results: Of 56 762 patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy, 2919 (5.14%) had PSMI. PSMI was not associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.0% versus 5.4%; P=0.979). In-hospital death or discharge to hospice occurred in 32.3% of patients with PSMI versus 17.5% without PSMI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45 [1.32–1.58])., Conclusions: While procedural adverse outcomes were no higher in patients with PSMI, further study is necessary to determine clinical benefit in this population.

[Figure: see text].

Background: Multiple states have not expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, resulting in higher uninsured rates in states with high stroke burdens. This study aimed to evaluate the association of Medicaid expansion with changes in health insurance coverage, severity of presentation, access to care, and outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke., Methods: A retrospective, difference-in-differences analysis of Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry data. The study population comprised first-time ischemic stroke admissions from 2012 to 2018 for patients aged 19 to 64 in 45 states (27 that expanded Medicaid and 18 that did not). A probable low-income cohort was defined based on having Medicaid, no insurance/self-pay, or undocumented insurance. Outcomes analyzed were indicators of health insurance status, stroke severity, use of emergency services, time to acute care, in-hospital mortality, receipt of rehabilitation, discharge disposition, and level of disability., Results: In the starting population (N=342 765), Medicaid-covered stroke admissions rose from 12.2% to 18.1% in expansion states and from 10.0% to only 10.6% in nonexpansion states, while uninsured admissions declined from 15.0% to 6.7% in expansion states and from 24.0% to 19.2% in nonexpansion states. In the low-income cohort (N=95 086; 28% of starting population), Medicaid expansion was associated with increased odds of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.12-1.59]) and transfer to any rehabilitation facility among those eligible (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.08-1.41]) and lower odds of discharge home (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98]). Expansion was not associated with any other outcomes., Conclusions: Medicaid expansion is associated with fewer uninsured hospitalizations for acute ischemic stroke and increased rehabilitation at skilled nursing facilities. More targeted interventions may be needed to improve other stroke outcomes in the low-income US population. Future research should evaluate the impact of health care reform on primary stroke prevention.

We examined the relationship between pain severity and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. Trends of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures grouped by patients' self-reported baseline bodily pain severity were compared using correlation tests, and the association between pain severity and clinical outcomes (including a primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization) was assessed using multivariable adjusted analyses. Of the 2310 patients, 22.9% reported no pain, 45.8% very mild/mild, 24.9% moderate, and 6.4% severe/very severe. Greater pain severity was associated with worse HRQoL measures (EuroQoL-5D-3L and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; both p < 0.0001). Compared to those reporting no pain, patients reporting severe/very severe pain had greater risk for the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.83, p = 0.01). In patients with HFrEF, greater pain severity was associated with worse HRQoL and clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: NCT00047437., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.)

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As directed therapy for Lp(a) emerges, it is important to understand patterns of Lp(a) testing in routine clinical practice. We set out to characterize Lp(a) testing across a large academic health system. Using electronic health record (EHR) data from 2014 to 2019, we compared patients who underwent Lp(a) testing to date-matched peers who had low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) assessment alone. We analyzed ordering provider characteristics and rates of initiation of new lipid lowering therapy (LLT) within 12 months after testing. Of 1,296 adults with Lp(a) test results, 629 (48.5%) had prior history of ASCVD and 667 (51.4%) did not. Compared with those with LDL-C testing alone, individuals who underwent Lp(a) testing were more like to have a myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke at a young age and multiple prior cardiovascular events. Though the majority of Lp(a) tests were ordered in outpatient encounters, a higher proportion of Lp(a) tests compared with LDL-C tests were performed in the inpatient setting. Neurology and psychiatry were the most common specialty to order Lp(a) tests in our cohort. There was a significantly increased initiation of LLT after Lp(a) testing compared with LDL-C testing across all medication types. Consistent with guidelines, Lp(a) testing is used in those with early onset ASCVD, and among those with multiple cardiovascular events. Lp(a) testing is associated with more aggressive LLT in following year. Further research is needed to characterize Lp(a) testing across larger populations., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Neha Pagidipati reports financial support was provided by Amgen, INC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Musculoskeletal pain conditions are a leading cause of pain and disability internationally and a common reason to seek health care. Accurate prediction of recurrence of health care seeking due to musculoskeletal conditions could allow for better tailoring of treatment. The aim of this project was to characterize patterns of recurrent physical therapy seeking for musculoskeletal pain conditions and to develop a preliminary prediction model to identify those at increased risk of recurrent care seeking., Design: Retrospective cohort., Setting: Ambulatory care., Subjects: Patients (n = 578,461) seeking outpatient physical therapy (United States)., Methods: Potential predictor variables were extracted from the electronic medical record, and patients were placed into three different recurrent care categories. Logistic regression models were used to identify individual predictors of recurrent care seeking, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to develop multivariate prediction models., Results: The accuracy of models for different definitions of recurrent care ranged from 0.59 to 0.64 (c-statistic), and individual predictors were identified from multivariate models. Predictors of increased risk of recurrent care included receiving workers' compensation and Medicare insurance, having comorbid arthritis, being postoperative at the time of the first episode, age range of 44-64 years, and reporting night sweats or night pain. Predictors of decreased risk of recurrent care included lumbar pain, chronic injury, neck pain, pregnancy, age range of 25-44 years, and smoking., Conclusion: This analysis identified a preliminary predictive model for recurrence of care seeking of physical therapy, but model accuracy needs to improve to better guide clinical decision-making., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)