Search

Supplementary Data

Purpose:Prognostic uncertainty is a major challenge for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Current models limit a meaningful patient-provider dialogue. We aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in CUP based on robust clinicopathologic prognostic factors.Experimental Design:We evaluated 521 patients with CUP at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX; 2012–2016). Baseline variables were analyzed using Cox regression and nomogram developed using significant predictors. Predictive accuracy and discriminatory performance were assessed by calibration curves, concordance probability estimate (CPE ± SE), and concordance statistic (C-index). The model was subjected to bootstrapping and multi-institutional external validations using two independent CUP cohorts: V1 [MDACC (2017), N = 103] and V2 (BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada and Sarah Cannon Cancer Center/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; N = 302).Results:Baseline characteristics of entire cohort (N = 926) included: median age (63 years), women (51%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1 (64%), adenocarcinomas (52%), ≥3 sites of metastases (30%), and median follow-up duration and OS of 40.1 and 14.7 months, respectively. Five independent prognostic factors were identified: gender, ECOG PS, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The resulting model predicted OS with CPE of 0.69 [SE: ± 0.01; C-index: 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68–0.74)] outperforming Culine/Seve prognostic models (CPE: 0.59 ± 0.01). CPE for external validation cohorts V1 and V2 were 0.67 (± 0.02) and 0.70 (± 0.01), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-year OS showed strong agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observations in all cohorts.Conclusions:Our user-friendly CUP nomogram integrating commonly available baseline factors provides robust personalized prognostication which can aid clinical decision making and selection/stratification for clinical trials.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a markedly heterogeneous disease, which portends a poor prognosis, with an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 15%. The standard of care of systemic therapy remains fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, with modest results, despite improvements with the combination with anti-angiogenics and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Significant advances in cancer therapy have been observed in the past two decades. The enhanced appreciation of molecular biology in oncology has allowed for the identification of specific molecular subtypes and novel therapeutic targets. Nevertheless, meaningful precision-based advancements in the therapeutic options for mCRC have been challenging and slow to realisation. Comprehensive molecular profiling and circulating tumour DNA highlight a heterogeneous disease at the genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic levels, and with a low frequency of actionable alterations. In the present review, the authors describe the current and emerging predictive biomarkers in mCRC, as well as present landmark clinical trials that have allowed for evolving precision in the therapeutic management. The understanding of the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with high microsatellite instability cancer and in those with POLE mutations or high tumour mutational burden, the combination of BRAF with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in BRAF V600-mutated patients, the use of allele-specific KRAS G12C inhibitors, the promising findings of dual anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-positive mCRC, and the possibility to offer targeted therapy for patients harbouring gene fusions NTRK/ALK/ROS1 have ushered in a new era of precision oncology for mCRC, providing personalised treatments and sustaining hope for patients affected by this challenging disease.

Liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer is a potentially curable disease. Pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the overall effect of bevacizumab on pR in preoperative systemic therapy for CLM.We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and LILACS for studies published between January 2004 and August 2019 that compared the pR of CT plus bevacizumab to CT alone as preoperative therapy for CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were pathologic major (pMaR) and minor (pMiR) response. Overall effects were expressed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.Of the 1,452 studies yielded by the search, 9 were eligible, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab and 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate without reaching statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.92, P = .32). However, pMaR was significantly higher (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.25, P.001), and pMiR was significantly lower (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54, P.001), in the bevacizumab group. The analyses showed a low level of heterogeneity (IThis meta-analysis demonstrates that bevacizumab plus preoperative CT is associated with higher rates of pR in CLM. Antiangiogenics might improve the OS of CLM patients and should be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.The benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is uncertain, but pathologic response (pR) to preoperative chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor. Our meta-analysis of observational studies compared the pR of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone as preoperative systemic therapy in the management of CLM. The addition of bevacizumab was associated with significantly higher rates of pR.

Despite the use of multimodality therapy, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) still presents high rates of disease recurrence. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) remains the cornerstone of neoadjuvant therapy of LARC, and novel therapies are urgently needed in order to improve the clinical outcomes.We aim to summarize data from completed and ongoing clinical trials addressing the role of biological therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and gene therapies in the systemic therapy of rectal cancer.Deeper understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has allowed meaningful advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic disease in the past few years. The larger applicability of biological therapy in CRC, including genome-guided targeted therapy, antiangiogenics, and immunotherapy, gives us optimism for the personalized management of rectal cancer. Microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors have demonstrated high sensitivity to ICIs, and preliminary findings in the neoadjuvant setting of rectal cancer are promising. To date, antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies in LARC have not demonstrated the same benefit seen in metastatic disease. The outstanding results accomplished by biomarker-guided therapy in metastatic CRC will guide future developments of biological therapy in LARC.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is an HPV-related malignancy with rising incidence in the past few decades in the US, characterized by high rates of complete response to chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. However, in a long-term follow-up, a meaningful subgroup of patients with locally advanced disease presents disease recurrence, which demands treatments with high morbidity and important impact in the quality of life. In metastatic or unresectable disease, palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care, but it is still associated with a dismal prognosis. Novel agents are urgently needed in the systemic therapy of SCCA. From a translational standpoint, there are many hurdles to overcome, since PI3KCA mutation is the most frequent genetic abnormality and actionable mutations are rarely found in SCCA, as well as it is characterized by low tumor mutational burden and low rates of high-frequency microsatellite instability. But the latest studies of immunotherapeutic approaches have produced promising findings and this therapeutic strategy is the major path being followed in the ongoing clinical trials. The latest advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA have provided the framework for the conception of new clinical trials. Therefore, carboplatin plus paclitaxel have become the backbone for novel agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), mainly anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, such as retifanlimab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have been studied in Phase III trials with chemotherapy in first-line therapy. Likewise, ICIs have been evaluated in locally advanced and refractory disease. Novel technologies, such as bispecific antibodies, and immunotherapeutic approaches, such as vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies, have also been tested in ongoing clinical trials. Immunotherapy may bring practice-changing advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA in the next few years and it might play a larger role in the therapeutic management of this challenging disease.

The social stigma surrounding an anal cancer diagnosis has traditionally prevented open discussions about this disease. However, as recent treatment options and an increasing rate of diagnoses are made worldwide, awareness is growing. In the United States alone, 9,090 individuals were expected to be diagnosed with anal cancer in 2021. The US annual incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus continues to increase by 2.7% yearly, whereas the mortality rate increases by 3.1%. The main risk factor for anal cancer is a human papillomavirus infection; those with chronic immunosuppression are also at risk. Patients with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop anal cancer compared with the general population. In this review, we have provided an overview of the carcinoma of the anal canal, the role of screening, advancements in radiation therapy, and current trials investigating acute and chronic treatment–related toxicities. This article is a comprehensive approach to presenting the existing data in an effort to encourage continuous international interest in anal cancer.

Background The impact of molecular aberrations on survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in patients with early-age-onset (EOCRC) versus late-age-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) is unknown. Methods Patients who underwent liver resection for CLM with known RAS, BRAF and MSI status were retrospectively studied. The prognostic impact of RAS mutations by age was analysed with age as a categorical variable and a continuous variable. Results The study included 573 patients, 192 with EOCRC and 381 with LOCRC. The younger the age of onset of CRC, the greater the negative impact on overall survival of RAS mutations in the LOCRC, EOCRC, and ≤40 years (hazard ratio (HR), 1.64 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–2.20), 2.03 (95% CI, 1.30–3.17), and 2.97 (95% CI, 1.44–6.14), respectively. Age-specific mortality risk and linear regression analysis also demonstrated that RAS mutations had a greater impact on survival in EOCRC than in LOCRC (slope: −4.07, 95% CI −8.10 to 0.04, P = 0.047, R2 = 0.08). Conclusion Among patients undergoing CLM resection, RAS mutations have a greater negative influence on survival in patients with EOCRC, more so in patients ≤40 years, than in patients with LOCRC and should be considered as a prognostic factor in multidisciplinary treatment planning.

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma anal cancer (SCCA) is rare. Prospective data recommends front-line platinum doublet combinations and second-line anti-programmed death-1 therapy. Standard therapy beyond these treatments are currently unknown. We evaluated anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) outcomes in metastatic SCCA.Metastatic SCCA patients given anti-EGFR mAb from Oct 2011-May 2018 were included. Primary endpoints included best response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.56 patients were evaluated with a median of one prior therapy. Most patients (~90%) received anti-EGFR mAbs with chemotherapy. Response rate (any response) was 41%. Median PFS was 4.3 months with a median OS of 16 M. Seven patients with disease control proceeded onto maintenance therapy (anti-EGFR mAb ± a fluoropyrimidine) with a median PFS of 13.8 M. Next generation sequencing of 16 pts (28%) showed 4 pts had a PIK3CA mutation with 3 of these 4 patients demonstrating progression on initial restaging.Our analysis suggests anti-EGFR mAb therapy with chemotherapy provides clinical benefit in previously treated metastatic SCCA. Our maintenance therapy and the role of PIK3CA MT outcomes were thought-provoking.Metastatic SCCA patients have limited options; therefore, anti-EGFR mAbs may provide benefit in the treatment armamentarium and should be further explored.

Background Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is an orphan disease with unique clinical attributes but often treated as colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding key molecular differences between AA and CRC is critical. Methods We performed retrospective analyses of AA patients (N = 266) with tumour and/or blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) (2013–2018) with in-depth clinicopathological annotation. Overall survival (OS) was examined. For comparison, CRC cohorts annotated for sidedness, consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and mutations (N = 3283) were used. Results Blood-NGS identified less RAS/GNAS mutations compared to tissue-NGS (4.2% vs. 60.9%, P RAS (56.2%), GNAS (28.1%) and TP53 (26.9%) were most frequent mutations. Well/moderately differentiated tumours harboured more RAS (69.2%/64.0% vs. 40.5%) and GNAS (48.7%/32.0% vs. 10.1%) while moderate/poorly differentiated tumours had more TP53 (26.0%/27.8% vs. 7.7%) mutations. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (compared to CRC) harboured significantly fewer APC (9.1% vs. 55.4%) and TP53 (26.9% vs. 67.5%) and more GNAS mutations (28.1% vs. 2.0%) (P Conclusion Integrated clinico-molecular profiling of AA identified key molecular drivers distinct from CRC. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma has a predominantly grade-driven biology that trumps mutations.

153 Background: Oxaliplatin is a backbone cytotoxic treatment for mCRC patients, particularly in the front-line setting. In the refractory disease, current treatment options are scarce and with limited efficacy. Several retrospective studies have explored the efficacy of oxaliplatin reintroduction/rechallenge (OxRe) in this scenario. However, more evidence is still needed to determine which patients do benefit from this treatment strategy. Methods: The discovery cohort includes all patients treated with oxaliplatin in a third- or fourth-line setting at VHIO between 2015 and 2021 (N = 102). Results were externally validated in a real-world cohort of patients treated at community oncology practices from Oncoclínicas Group in Brazil (N = 157). We analyzed the impact of clinical-molecular features in uni- and multivariable prognostic models in terms of median progression free survival (mPFS) (discovery cohort) and median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) (validation cohort). For both cohorts separately, data was extracted from EHRs in structured formats (demographics, tumor characteristics, pharmacy records) and combined with elements from unstructured sources (physician notes on progression and survival status) using technology-based abstraction techniques. Results: In the discovery cohort, 102 out of 735 mCRC patients (13,9%) were eligible. Median oxaliplatin-free interval (from Oxl stop to OxRe) was 17 months (CI95% 13.0-23.2). In OxRe setting, mPFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 3.29-5.03). In PFS multivariate analysis, determinants of favorable outcome were left tumor location (p = 0.01), oxaliplatin-free interval (p = 0.03), administration of Bev in refractory setting (p = 0.001), and not receiving Bev in first-line treatment (p = 0.008). Overall, 27% of all patients had a mPFS > 6 months with OxRe. In the validation cohort, out of 4,317 patients with mCRC, 157 (4%) were treated with OxRe. Median oxaliplatin-free interval was 15 months. Median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) of the OxRe was 3.4 months (CI95% 2.8-4.2). In multivariable model, the only independent prognostic factor was addition of Bev to OxRe (p = 0.036). Interestingly, 31% of all patients had mTTD > 6 months, largely enriched (65%) in patients with first Bev exposure at the time of OxRe. Conclusions: This study suggests that in refractory mCRC patients re-exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, the addition of Bev is associated with improved outcomes. One-third of the patients are long-term responders (PFS/TTD > 6 months), reinforcing the value of this strategy in selected populations and the relevance of anti-angiogenic agents in refractory mCRC.

55 Background: Right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a worse prognosis and the best first-line treatment is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing triplet versus doublet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated in a private institution in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Information of 118 patients with right-sided primary tumor was analyzed in this study. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. PFS and OS were calculated in months (m) using propensity-score weighting analysis (PSWA) due to expected disparity between the number of patients treated with triplet and doublet regimens. Variables used to balance patient groups were age; metastasectomy; primary tumor resection; bevacizumab use; BRAF and RAS mutation status. Results: The median follow-up was 31 months. Our population was mostly composed of elderly (64%) and female (52%) patients. First-line treatment with triplet backbone chemotherapy was done in 16 patients (14%). Primary tumor resection was done in 14% of the cases, 55% underwent metastasectomy, and 57% received anti-VEGF treatment. BRAF mutation was found in 9% of the patients and RAS mutation in 46%. After PSWA we found a significant better median PFS among patients treated with triplet regimen: 12.7m versus 8.9m compared to those receiving doublet backbone chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (CI 95%: 0.42 – 0.97); p-value: 0.037. No significant difference was found in OS (29.8m versus 45.5m) between triplet and doublet therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions: In our study we found a significantly better PFS with triplet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC, encouraging the use of this regimen in treatment-naive selected patients. However, no difference in OS was found, probably due to subsequent treatments. PSWA is an acceptable and needed tool to enable retrospective real world studies involving treatments with expected uneven distribution. More studies are needed to answer the best strategy to target right-sided mCRC, which remains a challenge for oncologists, with unmet needs.

Neste capítulo, apresentamos as principais anormalidades moleculares com implicações terapêuticas de cada tumor gastrointestinal e os resultados dos ensaios clínicos executados que permitiram a incorporação de novas terapias personalizadas na Oncologia Gastrointestinal.

Despite being markedly sensitive to chemoradiotherapy, patients with locally advanced (T3-4 and/or node-positive) squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) still present high rates of disease recurrence, which is characterized by meaningful morbidity and mortality. Abdominoperineal resection as salvage surgery may be considered for patients with local recurrence, but with an important negative impact in the quality of life. Systemic therapy of advanced SCCA is an unmet clinical need. Palliative chemotherapy for the management of unresectable or metastatic disease yields approximately 60% of objective response rate; however, it still portends a grim prognosis. Based on the recently published InterAACT trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel has become the standard of care of advanced disease; modified DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) may also be considered for fit patients amenable to intensive therapy. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of chemorefractory patients. Nevertheless, both nivolumab and pembrolizumab may be considered for these patients with promising results, regardless of PD-L1 expression or other predictive biomarkers. It is estimated that approximately 1 out of 5 patients with SCCA will derive large benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, which may produce considerable durations of response. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the combination of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line therapy, combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches, such as adoptive T cell therapies, are eagerly awaited and may bring practice-changing results in the next few years for the treatment of this challenging disease.

Introduction Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) presents rising incidence in the US. Standard of care for locally advanced disease is comprised of infusional 5FU plus mitomycin C or cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy (RT). We designed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a more convenient regimen composed of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Methods Single-arm, phase II trial, with treatment-naive stage II-IIIB (T X,1-4 N x M 0 ) SCCA patients. The regimen was composed of capecitabine (825 mg/m 2 BID, 5d) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m 2 weekly) during weeks 1-6, concurrent with RT (XELOX-XRT) (Group 1). After the first 11 patients, the study was amended to omit chemotherapy during the 3 rd and 6 th weeks (Group 2). The primary objective was 3-year time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and safety. Secondary objectives were complete response (CR) rate, locoregional control (LRC), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty patients were enrolled. Seven patients of group 1 (63%) developed grade 3 toxicity, which reduced to 22% in group 2. No grade 4 toxicities were noted. The median RT dose was 55 Gy. CR occurred in 100% of the 19 patients evaluable for response at 12-14 weeks. After median follow-up of 47.6 months, two patients had local recurrence and one had distant. 3-year TTF was 90.0%, with similar rates between group 1 and 2, respectively (90.9% versus 88.8%, p: 0.984). 3-year CFS was 90.0%. The median OS has not been reached. Conclusions The XELOX-XRT regimen is safe, with promising efficacy, and should be explored in larger trials in for the treatment of locally advanced SCCA.

Oesophageal cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. More than 80% of the cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy (including checkpoint inhibitors) and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of oesophageal and OGJ carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.

PURPOSEThe COVID-19 pandemic remains a public health emergency of global concern. Determinants of mortality in the general population are now clear, but specific data on patients with cancer remain limited, particularly in Latin America.MATERIALS AND METHODSA longitudinal multicenter cohort study of patients with cancer and confirmed COVID-19 from Oncoclínicas community oncology practice in Brazil was conducted. The primary end point was all-cause mortality after isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in patients initially diagnosed in an outpatient environment. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis and recursive partitioning modeling to define the baseline clinical determinants of death in the overall population.RESULTSFrom March 29 to July 4, 2020, 198 patients with COVID-19 were prospectively registered in the database, of which 167 (84%) had solid tumors and 31 (16%) had hematologic malignancies. Most patients were on active systemic therapy or radiotherapy (77%), largely for advanced or metastatic disease (64%). The overall mortality rate was 16.7% (95% CI, 11.9 to 22.7). In univariate models, factors associated with death after COVID-19 diagnosis were age ≥ 60 years, current or former smoking, coexisting comorbidities, respiratory tract cancer, and management in a noncurative setting ( P < .05). In multivariable logistic regression and recursive partitioning modeling, only age, smoking history, and noncurative disease setting remained significant determinants of mortality, ranging from 1% in cancer survivors under surveillance or (neo)adjuvant therapy to 60% in elderly smokers with advanced or metastatic disease.CONCLUSIONMortality after COVID-19 in patients with cancer is influenced by prognostic factors that also affect outcomes of the general population. Fragile patients and smokers are entitled to active preventive measures to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and close monitoring in the case of exposure or COVID-19-related symptoms.

Purpose: Prognostic uncertainty is a major challenge for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Current models limit a meaningful patient-provider dialogue. We aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in CUP based on robust clinicopathologic prognostic factors. Experimental Design: We evaluated 521 patients with CUP at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX; 2012–2016). Baseline variables were analyzed using Cox regression and nomogram developed using significant predictors. Predictive accuracy and discriminatory performance were assessed by calibration curves, concordance probability estimate (CPE ± SE), and concordance statistic (C-index). The model was subjected to bootstrapping and multi-institutional external validations using two independent CUP cohorts: V1 [MDACC (2017), N = 103] and V2 (BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada and Sarah Cannon Cancer Center/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; N = 302). Results: Baseline characteristics of entire cohort (N = 926) included: median age (63 years), women (51%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1 (64%), adenocarcinomas (52%), ≥3 sites of metastases (30%), and median follow-up duration and OS of 40.1 and 14.7 months, respectively. Five independent prognostic factors were identified: gender, ECOG PS, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The resulting model predicted OS with CPE of 0.69 [SE: ± 0.01; C-index: 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68–0.74)] outperforming Culine/Seve prognostic models (CPE: 0.59 ± 0.01). CPE for external validation cohorts V1 and V2 were 0.67 (± 0.02) and 0.70 (± 0.01), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-year OS showed strong agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observations in all cohorts. Conclusions: Our user-friendly CUP nomogram integrating commonly available baseline factors provides robust personalized prognostication which can aid clinical decision making and selection/stratification for clinical trials.

Introduction It has been determined that right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a worse prognosis for overall survival (OS). Currently, there is no consensus on the best systemic regimen for treatment-naive right-sided tumors. We compared the impact of subsequent therapies on OS of patients treated with FOLFOXIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) versus doublet regimens. Patients and Methods Data of patients with treatment-naive right-sided mCRC who received FOLFOXIRI or doublet regimens between January 2001 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. OS was compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results A total of 196 patients were selected; 33 patients received FOLFOXIRI and 163 patients doublet therapy. Median follow-up was 82.3 months. The FOLFOXIRI cohort received fewer subsequent lines of therapies (61% vs. 78%, P = .043). The greater the number of subsequent lines of therapy, the lower the risk of death (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.67 [0.46-0.99], 0.62 [0.45-0.86], and 0.56 [0.39-0.81] for > 1, > 2, and > 3 lines, respectively). By multivariate analysis, metastasectomy and bevacizumab with subsequent lines of therapy were the variables with greatest positive impact on OS (respectively, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.54 [0.38-0.78] and 0.61 [0.44-0.84]). Conclusion Patients with treatment-naive right-sided mCRC who received front-line FOLFOXIRI had a lower number of subsequent therapies than patients who received doublet regimens. Our findings highlight the relevance of the continuum of care in mCRC, regardless of the first-line regimen, and the importance of careful selection of patients for the FOLFOXIRI regimen.

58 Background: Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) are the only therapeutic options for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with demonstrated benefit in overall survival (OS). However, they are not accessible worldwide. In Brazil, they have been recently approved, but they have not yet been provided by public health system or private health insurances. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of that population in a setting with limited access to those drugs. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated at five Oncoclinicas centers in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The median OS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were evaluated via multivariable Cox Regression, calculating the Hazard Ratio (HR) and the confidence interval (CI95%). Results: A total of 163 patients (33% of the overall population) received third-line and 73 (15%) fourth-line systemic therapy. Median age was 62 years, 59% were male. Tumors were right-sided in 19%, RAS mutated 44%, BRAF mutated 3%, and high-frequency microsatellite instability 3%. Metastasectomy prior to third-line was performed in 62% of the patients. From the start of third-line therapy, median follow-up was 9.0 months, with 67% of deaths, and median OS was 13.7 months (CI95% 11.8m–20.0m). Most adopted regimens in third-and fourth-line were (1) rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy (39% and 26%, respectively); (2) rechallenge with irinotecan-based therapy (32% and 34%); (3) rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (20% and 29%); (4) regorafenib (13% and 25%); and (5) TAS-102 (2% and 4%). In multivariable model including clinical and molecular variables, prior metastasectomy was the only significant prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.51, CI95% 0.31–0.83, p=0.007). Conclusions: In real-world, a meaningful proportion of patients with mCRC are eligible for third and later lines of therapy. Rechallenge with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR agents is overused in a setting of limited access to therapies with demonstrated OS benefit, such as regorafenib and TAS-102. Barriers to drug access impair the adoption of the best evidence-based continuum of care and strategies to overcome them are urgently needed. Refractory patients in later lines of therapy derive survival benefit from prior metastasectomy.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is a rare malignancy, but its incidence rates have been increasing in the last decade. Studies have demonstrated that up to 47% of patients with locally advanced disease have high-risk features for treatment failure. The potential high rates of recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease and the lack of established care for metastatic disease have created an urgent need for the evaluation of new drugs that will ultimately improve the efficacy of treatment.This review presents results of recent phase-I and -II clinical trials which evaluate novel therapeutic modalities. The review also describes the findings of comprehensive genomic profiling studies which provide insights for promising therapeutics.HPV vaccination is underutilized in the United States and as a result, HPV-associated malignancies are likely to continue for several decades; however, pivotal breakthroughs may create a foundation for distinctive treatment approaches for other HPV-associated malignancies for which no other standard of care exists.

Key Points Question What are the efficacy and safety associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs standard therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)? Findings In a meta-analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials totaling 1657 patients, ICIs were associated with significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate compared with standard therapies. In addition, the rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was lower with ICIs than with sorafenib. Meaning These findings suggest that ICIs should be the new standard of care in systemic therapy of unresectable HCC., This meta-analysis assesses the overall treatment outcome associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma., Importance Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded conflicting results in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The overall effect of ICIs compared with standard therapies in unresectable HCC requires more research. Objective To estimate the efficacy and safety associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies in patients with unresectable HCC. Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting proceedings were systematically searched. Reference lists from studies selected by electronic searching were manually searched to identify additional relevant studies. The search included literature published or presented from February 2010 to February 2020. Study Selection From December 2019 to February 2020, independent reviewers evaluated each database, scanning the title, abstract, and keywords of every record retrieved. Full articles were further assessed if the information given suggested that the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing ICIs vs standard therapies in the treatment of unresectable HCC. Data Extraction and Synthesis The full text of the resulting studies and extracted data were reviewed independently according to PRISMA guidelines. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by a random-effects model. The likelihood of ICIs being associated with overall response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was expressed by odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR, and TRAEs. Results Of 1836 studies yielded by the search, 3 were retained, totaling 1657 patients (985 treated with ICIs vs 672 receiving standard treatment). Two studies evaluated ICIs as monotherapy, and 1 study investigated the combination of ICIs with bevacizumab. Compared with standard therapies (sorafenib in first-line therapy or placebo in second-line therapy), ICIs were associated with significantly improved OS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .006), PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97; P = .03), and ORR (OR, 2.82; 95% CI 2.02-3.93; P

Background Antiangiogenics attenuate chemotherapy-related hepatotoxicity and portal hypertension. The potential impact of bevacizumab on the efficacy and safety of partial splenic embolization (PSE) in the management of chemotherapy-induced hypersplenism (CIH) has never been investigated. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with gastrointestinal cancer patients who have undergone PSE for the treatment of thrombocytopenia resulting from hypersplenism. Pre- and post-PSE platelet count (PC), the percentage of patients who resumed systemic therapy, and complication rates were compared between patients exposed and not exposed to bevacizumab. Results A total of 110 patients were eligible. Colorectal cancer was the predominant neoplasm (60%), and 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab were the most commonly provided drugs (70%, 65%, and 65% of patients, respectively). After PSE, 80% of patients recovered PC ≥ 100 × 109/L (100K). Systemic therapy was resumed in 81% of patients. Seventy-one patients exposed to bevacizumab had a median PC before PSE of 77.5K and after PSE of 167.0K, with a mean difference of 108K (P Conclusion PSE is a safe and effective procedure in the management of CIH, regardless of the provision of bevacizumab. Splenic infarction rate should be optimized to enhance patient outcomes.

Introduction: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a challenging disease, whose systemic therapy has traditionally been based on a generalized population of patients, with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Immunotherapy has been shown to be efficacious in hypermutated tumors, such as those with microsatellite-instability (MSI-H). Nivolumab, and other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), have recently been evaluated in MSI-H mCRC, with remarkable results.Areas covered: Focused on nivolumab, we aim to present the rationale for the applicability of ICI in MSI-H CRC, and the results of completed phase I/II studies. Ongoing studies, including randomized clinical trials, and perspectives of immunotherapy in clinical scenarios in CRC will be discussed.Expert opinion: Phase I and II clinical trials provide strong evidence for the use of nivolumab and other ICI in the systemic therapy of MSI-H mCRC. Regulatory approvals are restricted to subsequent lines of therapy, but preliminary results in treatment-naive patients are encouraging. The findings for advanced disease and in the pilot phase II study in early-stage colon cancer open a new avenue for the applicability of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, which are currently under investigation. With the exception of POLE-mutated patients, there is little evidence for the use of immunotherapy in MSS patients.

PURPOSE Atypical, non-V600 BRAF ( aBRAF) mutations represent a rare molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinical data are used to categorize aBRAF mutations into class II (intermediate to high levels of kinase activity, RAS independent) and III (low kinase activity level, RAS dependent). The clinical impact of these mutations on anti-EGFR treatment efficacy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 2,084 patients with mCRC at a single institution and from an external cohort of 5,257 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS BRAF mutations were harbored by 257 patients, including 36 with aBRAF mutations: 22 class III, 10 class II, four unclassified. For patients with aBRAF mCRC, median OS was 36.1 months, without a difference between classes, and median OS was 21.0 months for patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. In contrast to right-sided predominance of tumors with BRAFV600E mutation, 53% of patients with aBRAF mCRC had left-sided primary tumors. Concurrent RAS mutations were noted in 33% of patients with aBRAF mCRC, and 67% of patients had microsatellite stable disease. Among patients with aBRAF RAS wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR antibodies (monotherapy, n = 1; combination therapy, n = 10), no responses to anti-EGFR therapy were reported, and six patients (four with class III aBRAF mutations, one with class II, and one unclassified) achieved stable disease as best response. Median time receiving therapy was 4 months (range, 1 to 16). In the ctDNA cohort, there was an increased prevalence of aBRAF mutations and subclonal aBRAF mutations ( P < .001 for both) among predicted anti-EGFR exposed compared with nonexposed patients. CONCLUSION Efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is limited in class II and III aBRAF mCRC. Detection of aBRAF mutations in ctDNA after EGFR inhibition may represent a novel mechanism of resistance.

1558 Background: COVID-19 is a challenge for clinical decision-making in cancer patients and the allocation of healthcare resources. An accurate prognosis prediction to effectively triage patients is needed, especially in the community oncology practice. Methods:Nationwide cohort from Oncoclínicas Brazil was used to validate previously developed multivariable logistic regression (mLR) model (Ferrari et al, JCO GO 2021) and to construct a machine learning Random Forest (RF) algorithm as predictor of 30-day mortality after SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR in cancer patients diagnosed in an outpatient setting. To find the most important baseline clinical determinants of early COVID-19-related death via Gini index, a RF with 100,000 trees was trained in 75% of the dataset, and the performance was assessed in the remaining 25%. We then compared the accuracy of different models in terms of sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Results:From March to December 2020, 533 patients with COVID-19 were prospectively registered in the database. Median age was 60 years (19-93) and 67% were female. Most frequent cancers were breast in 34%, hematological in 16%, and gastrointestinal in 15%. Comorbidities were common (52%), as was current/former smoking history (17%). Most patients were on active systemic therapy or radiotherapy (84%) in the advanced or metastatic disease setting (55%). The overall mortality rate was 15% (CI95% 12%-18%). We validated the original mLR model trained in the first 198 patients: management in a non-curative setting (odds ratio [OR] 3.7), age ≥ 60 years (OR 2.3), and current/former smoking (OR 1.9) were significant predictors of death in the expanded cohort. Presence of comorbidities (OR 1.9) also defined poor outcome in the updated mLR model, which yielded low sensitivity (74%), specificity (68%) and AUC (0.78). With RF modeling, the most significant predictors of 30-day death after COVID-19 (in decreasing order) were older age, treatment of advanced or metastatic disease, tumor type (respiratory tract, brain and unknown primary cancers had higher mortality), COVID-related symptom burden at baseline evaluation and treatment regimen (immunotherapy combinations had higher mortality). The RF model demonstrated high sensitivity (89%), specificity (88%) and AUC (0.96). Conclusions:The results highlight the possibility that machine learning algorithms are able to predict early mortality after COVID-19 in cancer patients with high accuracy. The proposed prediction model may be helpful in the prompt identification of high-risk patients based on clinical features alone, without having to wait for the results of additional tests such as laboratory or radiologic studies. It can also help prioritize medical resources and redefine vaccination strategies. A web-based mortality risk calculator will be created for clinical decision support.

e16631 Background: ICIs have ushered a new era in cancer therapy, but their efficacy in HCC is uncertain. Single-arm phase II studies with sorafenib-refractory patients have suggested clinical activity of nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which have become FDA-approved therapies. Nevertheless, the overall effect of ICIs compared with the standard of care (SOC) in unresectable HCC patients is still unknown. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and ASCO and ESMO Meeting Proceedings in the last 10 years for RCTs that have compared the efficacy of ICIs versus the SOC in the systemic therapy of unresectable HCC. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A summary hazard ratio (HR) of OS and PFS was calculated using 95% confidence intervals (CI) by fixed-effects model. The likelihood of ICIs being associated with ORR and TRAEs was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI using a random-effects model (PROSPERO ID 162599). Results: Of the 2,334 studies yielded by the search, 3 studies were retained (KEYNOTE-240, CheckMate-459, and IMbrave150), totaling 1,657 patients (985 ICIs versus 672 SOC). Two studies compared ICIs versus sorafenib in 1st line setting, and one study compared with placebo in 2nd line. The ICIs studied were pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab. RCTs with anti-CTLA4 have not been reported. Two studies evaluated ICIs as monotherapy, and one study investigated the association with bevacizumab. Compared with the SOC (sorafenib in 1st line or placebo in 2nd line), ICIs significantly improved OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 – 0.89, p = 0.0002), PFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 – 0.89, p < 0.0001), and ORR (OR: 2.82, 95% CI 2.02 – 3.93, p < 0.0001). ICIs were associated with a lower probability of grade 3-4 TRAEs when compared to sorafenib (OR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 – 0.96, p = 0.04). No significant heterogeneity was found among studies when OS and ORR were analyzed, but it was found in the analysis of PFS and TRAEs. Conclusions: ICIs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety compared to the standard therapy of patients with unresectable HCC. The analysis of ICIs as monotherapy and combination therapy increased the heterogeneity among studies. The association of anti-angiogenic therapy with ICIs improved the survival benefit of immunotherapy and should become the new SOC in the 1st line systemic therapy of unresectable HCC.

151 Background: Perioperative CT and resection of CLM are potentially curative therapies in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Retrospective studies suggest that preoperative bevacizumab increases pathologic response, which is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis addressing the effect of bevacizumab on pathologic response to preoperative therapy of CLM. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and LILACS from January/2004 to August/2019 for studies that have compared the pathologic response to CT plus bevacizumab versus CT alone as preoperative therapy of potentially resectable CLM. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoint was major response (MaR) (0-50% residual cancer cells or tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-3 in liver specimen). The likelihood of preoperative therapy being associated with pCR or MaR has been expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: Of the 1,319 studies yielded by the search, 9 studies were retained, totaling 1,202 patients (516 CT plus bevacizumab versus 686 CT alone). The addition of bevacizumab to CT increased the pCR rate, but it did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.81 – 1.92, p = 0.32). However, MaR was significantly superior in the bevacizumab group (OR: 2.20, 95% CI 1.47 – 3.29, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients have been submitted to oxaliplatin-based regimens in bevacizumab group compared to CT alone group (84% versus 68%, p < 0.001), while irinotecan-based regimens have been more common in the CT alone group (11% versus 28%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of bevacizumab to preoperative CT was associated with higher rates of pathologic response in liver resection of CLM. Anti-angiogenics might potentially improve the recurrence-free survival and OS in the management of potentially resectable CLM and should be evaluated as preoperative therapy in randomized clinical trials.

Background The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a non–5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods Sixty patients with stage III to IV HNSCC were treated with induction paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP; paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, 3 cycles) followed by CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2; D1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy). Results Fifty-six patients (93.3%) completed 3 cycles of induction TP (no treatment-related deaths), 52 (86.7%) completed definitive CRT per protocol (adverse event [AE] grade ≥2 in 53.3%). The overall response rate after induction TP was 82.5% for patients with resectable disease and 55.5% for unresectable disease (p = .023), and complete response (CR) rate after CRT was 70.0% for patients with resectable disease and 30.0% for unresectable disease (p = .005). Conclusion Induction TP followed by cisplatin based-CRT was well-tolerated, safe, and had high overall response rate in selected patients with locally advanced HNSCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2015

e15060 Background: Microsatellite stable (MSI-S) RS mCRC patients (pts) have a worse prognosis relative to left sided tumors for overall survival (OS). The present analysis aims to test the hypothesis that a triplet-regimen is superior compared to doublet-regimens (DR; FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) for OS. Methods: Pts with treatment-naive RS mCRC at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January/2011 to December/2018 were selected. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of mCRC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI versus DR. Pts treated with anti-EGFR therapy were excluded. Results: A total of 37 pts were treated with FOLFOXIRI and 111 pts with DR. There were no statistical difference between groups regarding gender, KRAS and BRAF mutations, peritoneal metastasis and bevacizumab use. There were statistical difference in age (median: 46y vs 59y) and metastasectomy rates (14% vs 32%) (p < 0.001). KRAS mutation was found in 65% of the population. Median follow-up was 55.3m. Median PFS was 6.5m vs 11.2m (HR: 1.30 95% CI 0.85 – 1.99) and median OS was 17.0m vs 26.3m (HR: 1.01 95% CI 0.60 – 1.68). By univariate analysis, pts who have undergone metastasectomy had superior PFS (14.9m vs 9.2m; p

The cure fraction models are usually used to model lifetime time data with long-term survivors. In the present article, we introduce a Bayesian analysis of the four-parameter generalized modified Weibull (GMW) distribution in presence of cure fraction, censored data and covariates. In order to include the proportion of “cured” patients, mixture and non-mixture formulation models are considered. To demonstrate the ability of using this model in the analysis of real data, we consider an application to data from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Inferences are obtained by using MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) methods.

Approximately 90% of the world population is infected by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Usually, it infects B lymphocytes, predisposing them to malignant transformation. Infection of epithelial cells occurs rarely, and it is estimated that about to 10% of gastric cancer patients harbor EBV in their malignant cells. Given that gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with a global annual incidence of over 950,000 cases, EBV-positive gastric cancer is the largest group of EBV-associated malignancies. Based on gene expression profile studies, gastric cancer was recently categorized into four subtypes; EBV-positive, microsatellite unstable, genomically stable and chromosomal instability. Together with previous studies, this report provided a more detailed molecular characterization of gastric cancer, demonstrating that EBV-positive gastric cancer is a distinct molecular subtype of the disease, with unique genetic and epigenetic abnormalities, reflected in a specific phenotype. The recognition of characteristic molecular alterations in gastric cancer allows the identification of molecular pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival, with the potential to identify therapeutic targets. These findings highlight the enormous heterogeneity of gastric cancer, and the complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic alterations in the disease, and provide a roadmap to implementation of genome-guided personalized therapy in gastric cancer. The present review discusses the initial studies describing EBV-positive gastric cancer as a distinct clinical entity, presents recently described genetic and epigenetic alterations, and considers potential therapeutic insights derived from the recognition of this new molecular subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Despite improvements in adjuvant therapies for gastric cancer in recent years, the disease is characterized by high recurrence rates and a dismal prognosis. The major improvement in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer in recent years has been the incorporation of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) heterodimerization, after the demonstrated predictive value of the overexpression and/or amplification of this receptor. Beyond HER2, other genetic abnormalities have been identified, and these mutations may be targetable by tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies. The demonstration of four distinct molecular subtypes of gastric cancer by the Cancer Genome Atlas study highlight the enormous heterogeneity of the disease and its complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic alterations and provide a roadmap to implement genome-guided personalized therapy in gastric cancer. In the present review, we aim to discuss, from a clinical point of view, the genomic landscape of gastric cancer described in recent studies, the therapeutic insights derived from these findings, and the clinical trials that have been conducted and those in progress that take into account tailored therapies for gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is one of the main cancer-related causes of death worldwide. The curative treatment of gastric cancer consists of tumor resection and lymphadenectomy. However, surgical treatment alone is associated with high recurrence rates. Adjuvant treatment strategies have been studied over the last decades, but there have been controversial results from the initial studies. The pivotal INT0116 study demonstrated that the use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil increases relapse-free and overall survival, and it has been adopted across the Western world. The high toxicity of radiochemotherapy and suboptimal surgical treatment employed, with fewer than 10% of the patients submitted to D2 lymphadenectomy, were the main study limitations. Since its publication, other adjuvant treatment modalities have been studied, and radiochemotherapy is being refined to improve its efficacy and safety. A multimodal approach has been demonstrated to significantly increase relapse-free and overall survival, and it can be offered in the form of perioperative chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of the extent of lymphadenectomy. The objective of the present review is to report the major advances obtained in the last decades in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer as well as the perspectives of treatment based on recent knowledge of the molecular biology of the disease.

Kaposi's sarcoma is a multifocal vascular lesion of low-grade potential that is most often present in mucocutaneous sites and usually also affects lymph nodes and visceral organs. The condition may manifest through purplish lesions, flat or raised with an irregular shape, gastrointestinal bleeding due to lesions located in the digestive system, and dyspnea and hemoptysis associated with pulmonary lesions. In the early 1980s, the appearance of several cases of Kaposi's sarcoma in homosexual men was the first alarm about a newly identified epidemic, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In 1994, it was finally demonstrated that the presence of a herpes virus associated with Kaposi's sarcoma called HHV-8 or Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus and its genetic sequence was rapidly deciphered. The prevalence of this virus is very high (about 50%) in some African populations, but stands between 2% and 8% for the entire world population. Kaposi's sarcoma only develops when the immune system is depressed, as in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, which appears to be associated with a specific variant of the Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus.There are no treatment guidelines for Kaposi's sarcoma established in Brazil, and thus the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology and the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases developed the treatment consensus presented here. Keywords: Kaposi's sarcoma, AIDS, Consensus, Cutaneous

AIM: To compare the performance of three commercially available anti-human epidermalgrowth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibodies in whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a series of gastric tumors. METHODS: We present a comparative analysis of three anti-HER2 antibodies (HercepTest, 4B5 and SP3) using TMA and whole-tissue sections prepared from the same paraffin blocks of 199 gastric adenocarcinomas operated upon between January 2004 and December 2008 at a Brazilian cancer hospital. The data on the patients’ age, sex, the anatomical location of the tumor and the Lauren’s histological classification were collected from clinical and pathological records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results were examined by two pathologists and the cases were classified as positive (3+), equivocal (2+) and negative (0 or 1+), according to the criteria of the IHC scoring system of gastric cancer. TMAs and whole-tissue sections were evaluated separately and independently. All cases yielding discordant IHC results and/or scored as 2+ were subjected to dual-color in situ hybridization in order to determine the final HER2 status. Besides determining the sensitivity and predictive value for HER2-positive status, we measured the accuracy of each antibody by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The agreement between the results obtained using the TMAs and those obtained using the whole-tissue sections was assessed by means of Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed with all antibodies. HER2-positive expression (3+) in the whole-tissue sections was observed in 23 cases (11.6%) using the 4B5 antibody, in 18 cases (9.1%) using the SP3 antibody and in 10 cases (5.1%) using the HercepTest antibody. In the TMAs, 11 positive cases (5.6%) were identified using SP3 antibody, 9 (4.6%) using the 4B5 antibody and 6 (3%) using the HercepTest antibody. The sensitivity using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 95.2% and 42.9% with 4B5, 90.5% and 66.7% with SP3 and 47.6% and 42.9% with HercepTest. The accuracy, calculated from the area under the ROC curve, using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 0.91 and 0.79 by 4B5, 0.86 and 0.80 by SP3 and 0.73 and 0.71 by HercepTest. The concordance of the results obtained using whole-tissue sections and TMA was 97.4% (Kappa 0.75) using HercepTest, 85.6% (Kappa 0.56) using SP3 and 84.1% (Kappa 0.38) using 4B5. CONCLUSION: The use of the 4B5 antibody on whole-tissue sections was the most accurate IHC method for evaluating HER2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma.

e14599 Background: The human EGFR family is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of several solid tumors. However, there is no consensus about the prognostic role of HER2 expression and of other members of EGFR family in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of members of the EGFR family in gastric cancer. Methods: Retrospective study with 201 patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma stages 0 to IV (AJCC 6th edition) who underwent primary tumor resection between January 2006 and December 2008 at Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil. Tissue from primary tumors were analyzed by tissue microarray technology. IHC scores 0 and 1+ were classified as negative and scores 2+ and 3+ as positive, both for membrane and cytoplasmic expression of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. The HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer was used for classification. Correlations between receptor expression and clinicopathological characteristics were performed according to the chi-square test. Survival analysis was calculated according to a parametric Weibull model with a mixture model incorporating long-term survivors. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed by a regression model incorporating long-term survivors with the Weibull distribution. Results: Membrane expression of HER1, HER2 and HER4 were 9%, 17% and 15%, respectively. No membrane expression of HER3 was observed. Cytoplasmic expression of HER1, HER3 and HER4 were 45%, 62% and 24%, respectively. Expression of HER2 and HER3 correlated with intestinal-type histology (p: 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and advanced age (p: 0.011 and p: 0.008, respectively). According to a regression model adjusted for age, surgical radicality, surgical modality, Laurén histology, adjuvant therapy, TNM stage and receptors expressions, only TNM stage showed prognostic influence. Conclusions: Expression of HER2 and other members of EGFR family did not have influence on the overall survival in the gastric cancer population studied. The elaboration of a systematic review with meta-analysis or a prospective study could help elucidate this controversial issue.

Purpose To develop and validate a new multimedia instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Portuguese-speaking patients with cancer. Methods A mixed-methods study conducted in a large Brazilian Cancer Hospital. The instrument was developed along the following sequential phases: identification of HRQOL issues through qualitative content analysis of individual interviews, evaluation of the most important items according to the patients, review of the literature, evaluation by an expert committee, and pretesting. In sequence, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted (pilot testing, n = 149) to reduce the number of items and to define domains and scores. The psychometric properties of the IQualiV-OG-21 were measured in a large multicentre Brazilian study (n = 323). A software containing multimedia resources were developed to facilitate self-administration of IQualiV-OG-21; its feasibility and patients’ preferences (“paper and pencil” vs. software) were further tested (n = 54). Results An exploratory factor analysis reduced the 30-item instrument to 21 items. The IQualiV-OG-21 was divided into 6 domains: emotional, physical, existential, interpersonal relationships, functional and financial. The multicentre study confirmed that it was valid and reliable. The electronic multimedia instrument was easy to complete and acceptable to patients. Regarding preferences, 61.1 % of them preferred the electronic format in comparison with the paper and pencil format. Conclusions The IQualiV-OG-21 is a new valid and reliable multimedia HRQOL instrument that is well-understood, even by patients with low literacy skills, and can be answered quickly. It is a useful new tool that can be translated and tested in other cultures and languages. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2675-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.