Search

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Scale (HRERS) in a postacute rehabilitation sample. We hypothesized that HRERS items would comprise a single factor, and would demonstrate adequate internal consistency and temporal stability, and significant relationships with key constructs. Research Method and Design: Retrospective medical record review between 2016 and 2017 of older veterans (N = 107) admitted to a community living center postacute care (CLC-PAC) rehabilitation hospital unit to address targeted physical therapy rehabilitation goals. Inclusion criteria included availability of two HRERS administrations at Time 1 (admission) and Time 2 (approximately one-month follow-up or physical therapist/CLC-PAC discharge). RESULTS Across timepoints, HRERS items reflect a single factor of engagement, and the scale has good internal consistency at admission (Time 1, α = .759) and follow-up (Time 2, α = .877). The temporal stability of HRERS across ratings was r = .56 (p < .001). Increased pain rating (r = -.309, p < .01) and depressive symptoms (-.287, p < .01) at admission correlates with subsequent physical therapist (PT) engagement (HRERS Time 2). Low admission PT engagement correlates with less frequent PT attendance (r = -.242, p < .01) and greater number of consults placed during the CLC stay (r = -.222, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS HRERS is a reliable and valid measure of PT engagement in older CLC-PAC Veterans. Findings support the administration of the HRERS at more than one timepoint during rehabilitation to inform interventions targeting select behavioral health factors such as pain and depression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Objectives: Evaluate the relative contribution of cognitive test performance to post-acute care (PAC) length of stay (LOS) and rehospitalization while controlling for key demographic, medical, and functional outcomes. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of 160 older Veterans, including cognitive test performance (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–Revised [ACE-R]), on admission to a Veterans Administration Hospital Community Living Center (CLC) PAC. Results: Individuals with impaired scores on the ACE-R had a longer LOS (10 median days longer; U = 2,547.00, p = .028). Of those rehospitalized, 71.4% ( n = 20) screened positive for cognitive impairment. Key medical factors explained the largest amount of variance in CLC-PAC LOS (29.8%), followed by admission ADL (activities of daily living) dependency (4.6%) and ACE-R total score (3.30%). Discussion: Cognitive screening should be considered on PAC admission, with impairment on ACE-R predicting geriatric rehabilitation outcomes such as risk of increased LOS and rehospitalization.

Cardiopulmonary physical therapy was the first recognized clinical specialty within physical therapy in 1978. Since that time, clinical practice in cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy has changed dramatically. In order to maintain currency in this field, the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties requires that a practice analysis be performed at least every 10 years. This paper reports the process of the most recent practice analysis in cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy which led to the 2007 version of the Description of Specialist Practice: Cardiovascular and Pulmonary.