1. Should the governments of ‘developed’ countries be held responsible for equalizing the indigenous health gap?
- Author
-
Daniel Wadsworth, Lee Stoner, Yves-Yvette Young, Alexandra Montano, Chantel Bonner, Parirash Abdolhosseini, and Michelle A. Williams
- Subjects
Canada ,Social Determinants of Health ,Indigenous health ,Globe ,Context (language use) ,Indigenous ,03 medical and health sciences ,Life Expectancy ,0302 clinical medicine ,Population Groups ,Political science ,Development economics ,Health care ,medicine ,Health Services, Indigenous ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,World view ,Government ,030505 public health ,business.industry ,Developed Countries ,Australia ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Health Status Disparities ,United States ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Socioeconomic Factors ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Developed country ,New Zealand - Abstract
Across the globe there is significant variation between and within indigenous populations in terms of world view, culture, and socio-political forces. However, many indigenous groups do share a striking commonality: greater rates of non-communicable diseases and shorter life expectancies than non-indigenous compatriots. Notably, this health gap persists for ‘developed’ countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. The question of who is responsible for equalizing the gap is complicated. Using Australia as an exemplar context, this commentary will present arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ the governments of developed nations being held liable for closing the indigenous health gap. We will discuss the history and nature of the health gap, actions needed to ‘close the gap’, and which party has the necessary resources to do so.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF