Search

Determine the safety and initial efficacy of a novel biofeedback intervention to improve landing mechanics in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Forty patients post-ACLR (age: 16.9 ± 2.0 years) were randomly allocated to a biofeedback intervention or an attention control group. Patients in the biofeedback group completed 12 sessions over six-weeks that included bilateral unweighted squats with visual and tactile biofeedback. Patients in the control group completed a six-week educational program. Lower extremity mechanics were collected during a bilateral stop jump at baseline, six-weeks, and 12-weeks post-intervention. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for sex and graft type determined the main effects of and interactions between group and time.No group by time interaction existed for peak knee extension moment symmetry. A group by time interaction existed for peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry (p = 0.012), where patients in the biofeedback group had greater improvements in symmetry between baseline and post-intervention that were not maintained through the retention assessments.This novel biofeedback program did not reduce risk factors for second ACL injuries. Future work could develop and test multidisciplinary interventions for reducing second ACL injury risk factors.GOV IDENTIFIER: (NCT03273673).

Background Identifying altered motor control patterns during functional movements in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) has important clinical implications for reducing the risk of recurrence. While prior research has shown that magnitudes of lumbar and hip motion are not altered in patients with chronic non-specific LBP, it is possible that outcomes which describe coordination could provide greater discriminatory information between pathological and healthy movement. Research question Determine the effect of biological sex and chronic non-specific LBP on coordination between hip and lumbar motion during cyclic and discrete reaching. Methods Twenty participants with chronic non-specific LBP (11 male/9 female, 23.5 ± 4.9 years old) and 21 control participants (12 male/9 female, 22.9 ± 6.1 years old) completed discrete and cyclic reaching tasks to a target in the mid-sagittal plane, while whole-body kinematics were collected using a three-dimensional motion capture system. Movement time, lumbar motion, hip motion, and the ratio between lumbar and hip motion were compared between participants with and without chronic non-specific LBP and between men and women using two-way mixed ANOVAs. Results Participants with chronic non-specific LBP had reduced lumbar-hip ratios relative to control participants during both the cyclic (F = 4.779, p = 0.035, η2 = 0.114) and discrete tasks (F = 4.743, p = 0.036, η2 = 0.119), however group differences were not observed for hip or lumbar excursion during either task (p > 0.05). Participants with chronic non-specific LBP had slower reaching times relative to controls during the discrete reaching task (F = 4.795, p = 0.035, η2 = 0.115). No significant effects of sex, and no interactions between group and sex were observed for any outcome. Significance Reduced lumbar-hip ratios during reaching likely reflect a compensatory movement strategy that could play an important role in the development and progression of LBP.

Background: Proper lower extremity biomechanics during bilateral landing is important for reducing injury risk in athletes returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although landing is a quick ballistic movement that is difficult to modify, squatting is a slower cyclic movement that is ideal for motor learning. Hypothesis: There is a relationship between lower extremity biomechanics during bilateral landing and bilateral squatting in patients with an ACLR. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 41 patients after a unilateral ACLR (24 men, 17 women; 5.9 ± 1.4 months after ACLR) completed 15 unweighted bilateral squats and 10 bilateral stop-jumps. Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were collected, and peak knee abduction angle, knee abduction/adduction range of motion, peak vertical ground-reaction force limb symmetry index (LSI), vertical ground-reaction force impulse LSI, and peak knee extension moment LSI were computed during the descending phase of the squatting and landing tasks. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare each outcome between limbs, and Spearman correlations were used to compare outcomes between the squatting and landing tasks. Results: The peak vertical ground reaction force, the vertical ground reaction force impulse, and the peak knee extension moment were reduced in the surgical (Sx) limb relative to the nonsurgical (NSx) limb during both the squatting and landing tasks ( P < .001). The relationship between squatting and landing tasks was strong for the peak knee abduction angle ( R = 0.697-0.737; P < .001); moderate for the frontal plane knee range of motion (NSx: R = 0.366, P = .019; Sx: R = 0.418, P = 0.007), the peak knee extension moment LSI ( R = 0.573; P < .001), the vertical ground reaction force impulse LSI ( R = 0.382; P < .014); and weak for the peak vertical ground reaction force LSI ( R = 0.323; P = .039). Conclusion: Patients who have undergone an ACLR continue to offload their surgical limb during both squatting and landing. Additionally, there is a relationship between movement deficits during squatting and movement deficits during landing in patients with an ACLR preparing to return to sports. Clinical Relevance: As movement deficits during squatting and landing were related before return to sports, this study suggests that interventional approaches to improve squatting biomechanics may translate to improved landing biomechanics in patients with an ACLR.

Objectives 1) Determine the concurrent validity of using automated 2D video analysis relative to 3D motion capture for assessing frontal and sagittal-plane knee kinematics during landing, 2) compare the accuracy of visually estimating joint center locations (2D Manual) with computing joint center locations using anatomical markers (2D Automatic), and 3) compare landing kinematics between a controlled laboratory setting and a non-laboratory setting. Design Validity/repeatability study. Settings Biomechanics research laboratory and non-laboratory athletic facility. Participants Thirty uninjured recreational athletes. Main Outcome Measures Peak knee flexion, knee flexion range of motion, peak knee frontal plane projection angle, and knee frontal plane projection angle range of motion during bilateral and unilateral landing were measured simultaneously in 3D using motion capture and in 2D using two low-cost video cameras during the first study session (biomechanics research laboratory), and in 2D only during the second study session (non-laboratory athletic facility). Results There was good to excellent agreement between 3D motion capture and both 2D Manual (ICC = 0.86–0.99) and 2D Automatic (ICC = 0.89–0.99) video analysis methods. There was good to excellent agreement between data collected in a laboratory and non-laboratory setting (ICC = 0.75–0.95). Conclusion The methods introduced in this study are inexpensive, reliable, and feasible for use in non-laboratory settings.

Landing biomechanics provide important information pertaining to second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in patients following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). While traditional motion analysis technologies are often impractical for use in non-laboratory settings, methods to assess landing biomechanics which are inexpensive, portable, and user-friendly have recently been developed and validated. The purpose of this study was to compare landing kinematics and kinetics between ACLR patients and uninjured controls in a non-laboratory setting. Sixteen ACLR patients (7 male/9 female, 6-12 months post-ACLR) and 16 gender-matched controls completed seven bilateral drop vertical jumps and seven unilateral drop landings on each limb. Plantar force was measured bilaterally using force sensing insoles and frontal and sagittal-plane knee kinematics were measured using two tablets, six reflective markers, and automated point tracking software. Plantar force impulse normalized symmetry index (NSI) and knee frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) range of motion were computed during bilateral landing, and knee flexion range of motion NSI was computed during unilateral landing and compared between groups using independent samples t tests. ACLR patients had larger NSIs (reflecting less symmetry) for plantar force impulse during bilateral landing (p < 0.001) and knee flexion range of motion during unilateral landing (p = 0.004). No between-group differences were observed for knee FPPA range of motion (p = 0.111). This study is an important step towards assessing landing biomechanics in non-research settings with the goal of providing quantitative injury risk metrics in a clinical setting that can be used for return to sport decision making.

Two-dimensional video analysis is commonly used to assess kinematics when three-dimensional motion capture is unavailable. However, videos are often assessed using manual digitization, which limits the ability to extract outcomes that require continuous data. Here, we introduced a method to collect continuous kinematic data in 2D using an inexpensive camera and an open-source automated marker tracking program. We tested the validity of this method by comparing 2D video analysis to 3D motion capture for measuring sagittal-plane running kinematics. Twenty uninjured participants ran on a treadmill for 1-min while lower extremity kinematics were collected simultaneously in 3D using a motion capture system and in 2D using a single digital camera, both at 120 Hz. Knee, ankle, and foot angle at contact, peak knee flexion, knee flexion excursion, and knee-ankle flexion vector coding variability were computed using both the 3D and 2D kinematic data, and were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. The agreement between collection methods was excellent for foot angle at contact and knee flexion excursion, good for ankle and knee angle at contact and knee-ankle vector coding variability, and moderate for peak knee flexion. However, Bland-Altman plots revealed significant differences between the 2D and 3D collection methods, which varied across study participants. These low-cost methods could be useful for collecting continuous sagittal plane running kinematics in non-laboratory settings.

Hop tests are widely used to quantify recovery from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. However, there is evidence that simply measuring hop distance may not be indicative of the quality of movement or representative of potential limitations in hopping mechanics, particularly during landing. The first purpose of the present study was to compare hop distance and loading symmetry between ACLR athletes and healthy uninjured recreational athletes. The second was to determine the association between hop distance and loading symmetry.Twenty-five ACLR patients and 30 healthy controls completed the single hop, triple hop, and crossover hop test on each limb while the loadsol®, a single-sensor force insole, collected impact forces (100 Hz). A limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for hop distance, peak impact force, loading rate, and impulse from the final landing of each trial. LSI values were compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U tests, and distance and loading LSI values were compared using Spearman rank correlations.ACLR patients had reduced symmetry in hop distance and loading relative to healthy controls for every hop test and outcome measure (P0.05), except peak impact force on the single hop. Hop distance symmetry was significantly related to each loading symmetry measure on the crossover hop test (P0.01) and to peak impact force and impulse symmetry on the single hop test (P0.05) in each group.This study demonstrates that ACLR patients both hop further and generate larger forces when hopping on their nonsurgical limb relative to their surgical limb. In addition, hop distance and loading symmetry provide clinicians and researchers with different information and therefore should be considered together when making return to sport decisions.

BACKGROUND Complex movement pathologies that are biopsychosocial in nature (eg, back pain) require a multidimensional approach for effective treatment. Virtual reality is a promising tool for rehabilitation, where therapeutic interventions can be gamified to promote and train specific movement behaviors while increasing enjoyment, engagement, and retention. We have previously created virtual reality–based tools to assess and promote lumbar excursion during reaching and functional gameplay tasks by manipulating the position of static and dynamic contact targets. Based on the framework of graded exposure rehabilitation, we have created a new virtual reality therapy aimed to alter movement speed while retaining the movement-promoting features of our other developments. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare lumbar flexion excursion and velocity across our previous and newly developed virtual reality tools in a healthy control cohort. METHODS A total of 31 healthy participants (16 males, 15 females) took part in 3 gamified virtual reality therapies (ie, Reachality, Fishality, and Dodgeality), while whole-body 3D kinematics were collected at 100 Hz using a 14-camera motion capture system. Lumbar excursion, lumbar flexion velocity, and actual target impact location in the anterior and vertical direction were compared across each virtual reality task and between the 4 anthropometrically defined intended target impact locations using separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance models. RESULTS There was an interaction between game and impact height for each outcome (all P CONCLUSIONS Lumbar flexion velocity was reduced during Fishality relative to that during Dodgeality and resembled velocity demands more similar to those for a self-paced reaching task (ie, Reachality). Additionally, lumbar motion and target impact location during Fishality were more similar to those during Reachality than to those during Dodgeality, which suggests that this new virtual reality game is an effective tool for shaping movement. These findings are encouraging for future research aimed at developing an individualized and graded virtual reality intervention for patients with low back pain and a high fear of movement.

Purposes The goals of this work were to 1) determine the relationship between psychological readiness for return to sport and side-to-side symmetry during jump-landing in patients recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 2) determine whether psychological readiness for return to sport, graft type, meniscal pathology, sex, and time since surgery could predict landing symmetry in ACLR patients. Methods Thirty-eight patients recovering from primary unilateral ACLR (22 male/16 female; 19 patellar tendon autograft/19 hamstring autograft; age: 16.3 ± 1.9 years; 25.7 ± 6.2 weeks post-operative) completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and ten bilateral stop-jumps. Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were collected at 240 and 1920 Hz, respectively. Peak knee extension moment limb symmetry index (LSI) was computed during the first landing of the stop-jump. The relationship between the ACL-RSI and peak knee extension moment LSI was determined using Pearson correlations. Multivariate regression was used to determine the ability of the ACL-RSI, graft type, meniscal pathology, sex, time since surgery, stop jump entry speed, and jump height to predict knee extension moment LSI. Results There was a significant relationship between the ACL-RSI and peak knee extension moment LSI (r = 0.325; p = 0.047). The backward regression model found that 36.9% of the variance in knee extension moment LSI could be explained by the ACL-RSI (p = 0.040), graft type (p = 0.006), and jump height (p = 0.027). Conclusions There is a significant moderate association between psychological readiness for return to sport and asymmetric landing kinetics in patients following ACLR. Future work should investigate whether improving movement confidence results in improved kinetic landing symmetry.

New portable and low-cost technologies for assessing limb loading may be useful in non-laboratory environments, but have relatively low sampling frequencies. The lowest recommended sampling frequency for impact kinetics has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sampling frequency on metrics of impact kinetics during landing, walking, and running. This was a retrospective analysis of bilateral drop vertical jumps, unilateral drop landings, treadmill running, and flat, inclined, and declined treadmill walking. Landing data were collected at 1920 Hz while walking and running data were collected at 1440 Hz. Impact kinetics were computed at the highest possible sampling frequency, and then data were continuously down-sampled to determine the impact on the following computed metrics: peak impact force, average LR, and impulse. The minimum sampling frequency to compute each outcome with 90%, 95%, and 99.5% accuracy when compared to the original sampling frequency were determined. To achieve 90% of the true value of impact force, a sampling frequency of 180 Hz was needed for running, 62 Hz for bilateral landing, and 48 Hz for remaining tasks. For average LR, a sampling frequency of 1440 Hz was need for running, 63 Hz for inclined walking, 192 Hz for bilateral landing, and 48 Hz for the remaining tasks. For impulse, 48 Hz was required for all tasks. The results of this study provide future researchers with a guide for selecting the sampling frequency required to accurately assess impact kinetics during walking, landing, or running.

Two-dimensional video analysis is commonly used to assess kinematics when three-dimensional motion capture is unavailable. However, videos are often assessed using manual digitization, which limits the ability to extract outcomes that require continuous data. Here, we introduced a method to collect continuous kinematic data in 2D using an inexpensive camera and an open-source automated marker tracking program. We tested the validity of this method by comparing 2D video analysis to 3D motion capture for measuring sagittal-plane running kinematics. Twenty uninjured participants ran on a treadmill for 1-min while lower extremity kinematics were collected simultaneously in 3D using a motion capture system and in 2D using a single digital camera, both at 120 Hz. Knee, ankle, and foot angle at contact, peak knee flexion, knee flexion excursion, and knee-ankle flexion vector coding variability were computed using both the 3D and 2D kinematic data, and were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. The agreement between collection methods was excellent for foot angle at contact and knee flexion excursion, good for ankle and knee angle at contact and knee-ankle vector coding variability, and moderate for peak knee flexion. However, Bland-Altman plots revealed significant differences between the 2D and 3D collection methods, which varied across study participants. These low-cost methods could be useful for collecting continuous sagittal plane running kinematics in non-laboratory settings.

Background:Athletes who return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often have reduced physical performance and a high reinjury rate. Additionally, it is currently unclear how physical performance measures can change during the RTS transition and with the use of a functional knee brace.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of time since surgery (at RTS and 3 months after RTS) and of wearing a brace on physical performance in patients who have undergone ACLR. We hypothesized that physical performance measures would improve with time and would not be affected by brace condition.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:A total of 28 patients who underwent ACLR (9 males, 19 females) completed physical performance testing both after being released for RTS and 3 months later. Physical performance tests included the modified agility t test (MAT) and vertical jump height, which were completed with and without a knee brace. A repeated-measures analysis of variance determined the effect of time and bracing on performance measures.Results:The impact of the knee brace was different at the 2 time points for the MAT side shuffle ( P = .047). Wearing a functional knee brace did not affect any other physical performance measure. MAT times improved for total time ( P < .001) and backpedal ( P < .001), and vertical jump height increased ( P = .002) in the 3 months after RTS.Conclusion:The present study showed that physical performance measures of agility and vertical jump height improved in the first 3 months after RTS. This study also showed that wearing a knee brace did not hinder physical performance.Clinical Relevance:Wearing a functional knee brace does not affect physical performance, and therefore a brace could be worn during the RTS transition without concern. Additionally, physical performance measures may still improve 3 months past traditional RTS, therefore justifying delayed RTS.

Background The inability to standardize footwear is a potential issue when measuring landing kinetics in non-laboratory settings. This study determined the impact of not standardizing footwear on load and load symmetry during landing. A secondary purpose of this study was to introduce the Load Analysis Program, an open-source MATLAB® user-interface for computing kinetic and kinetic symmetry from data collected using loadsol® sensors. Methods Forty uninjured participants completed bilateral and unilateral landing tasks in their own preferred athletic footwear and in laboratory-standardized footwear. Peak impact force, impulse, and a limb symmetry index of both kinetic outcomes were computed using loadsol® sensors (200 Hz) for both footwear conditions, and compared between footwear conditions using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. Findings The agreement between the preferred and standardized conditions was good to excellent for peak impact force, peak impact force limb symmetry index, and impulse limb symmetry index during the bilateral task (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.870–0.951). The agreement was moderate to poor for unilateral limb symmetry index measures (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.399–0.516). During the preferred footwear condition, impulse was greater for the left limb during bilateral landing, and peak impact force during unilateral landing on the right limb was decreased, when compared to the standardized footwear condition (p Interpretation These results suggest that while not standardizing footwear can alter the results of certain load metrics, laboratory-relevant landing mechanics information can be obtained with participants wearing their own footwear.

Background Assessing landing kinetics during hop testing could improve return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) reconstruction. However, different methods for normalizing kinetic outcomes could influence the interpretation of landing kinetics and therefore the clinical recommendations. Methods Twenty-one females who had returned to sport following primary unilateral ACL reconstructed completed two single hops for maximum distance on each limb. Hop distance, hop height, peak impact force, and impulse were computed for each hop, and peak impact force and impulse magnitudes were assessed when 1) non-normalized 2) normalized by bodyweight, and 3) normalized by peak potential energy during the hop. Findings Along with hop distance and height, peak impact force and impulse were found to be lower on the surgical limb relative to the non-surgical limb for both non-normalized data and when normalized to bodyweight only (p 0.95). However, peak impact force and impulse were found to be higher on the surgical limb relative to the non-surgical limb when normalizing outcomes to peak potential energy (p 1.03). Interpretation Different normalization methods result in different interpretations of single hop kinetics. ACL reconstruction patients have shorter hop distances, lower hop heights, lower force magnitudes, and worse energy absorption when hopping on their surgical limb, relative to their non-surgical limb. We believe that normalizing landing kinetics using bodyweight and using peak potential energy provide different information, and as such, we suggest that future research use both methods based on the research question.

Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have high fall risk due to altered balance. To measure dynamic balance during walking, margin of stability (MoS) examines how the extrapolated center of mass moves relative to the base of support. This study investigates how MoS is affected in PwMS during walking at preferred, slow, and fast speeds, as well as the relationship between MoS and the Expanded Disability Severity Score (EDSS), fall history, and self-report balance confidence questionnaire. MoS was evaluated in PwMS without clinical gait impairment (MS1; n=20), PwMS with clinical gait impairment (MS2; n=20), and age-matched healthy controls (HC) (n=20), in the anterior/posterior (AP) and medial/lateral (ML) direction at heel strike and midstance. In the AP direction, MS2 had a higher MoS than HC (p

There is currently no consensus among orthopaedic surgeons as to when patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are ready to return to sport or whether or not patients should wear a functional knee brace during athletic activity. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of time since return to sport and of a functional knee brace on hop distance and loading symmetry during hop testing in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Twenty-eight patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction completed hop testing after being released to return to sport and again 3 months later, both with and without wearing a custom fit extension constraint functional knee brace. The loadsol® captured plantar loading data (100 Hz) to quantify peak impact force, loading rate, and impulse during the final landing of every hop test. A limb symmetry index was calculated between surgical and non-surgical limbs for hop distance and loading measures.Wearing a knee brace increased hop distance symmetry during the single and crossover hop tests and peak impact force symmetry on each test (all p 0.05). While single (p = 0.022) and triple (p = 0.002) hop distance symmetry increased with time, there was no effect of time on any loading symmetry outcomes.These results support using a functional knee brace during athletic activities for improving symmetry in the early return to sport period. These results also support previous findings that while hop distance symmetry improves with time, asymmetrical landing mechanics do not and should be addressed clinically.

Objectives To compare physiological impairments between persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) with a history of falls and persons with MS without a history of falls, and to investigate the association between physiological impairments and dynamic balance. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting University motion analysis laboratory. Participants Persons with MS (N=55; 27 recurrent fallers and 28 nonfallers). Participants were classified as fallers if they self-reported ≥2 falls in the previous 6 months. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Physiological impairment was assessed with sensorimotor delays, spasticity, plantar cutaneous sensation, and the sensory, cerebellar, and pyramidal subscales of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Dynamic balance was assessed using the average and variability of margin of stability and variability of trunk accelerations. Results Compared with nonfallers, fallers had lower plantar sensation, longer sensorimotor delays, more spasticity, and more impairment in the pyramidal and cerebellar subscales of the EDSS. Additionally, these impairments were all moderately to strongly correlated with worse dynamic balance. Conclusions This study highlights the multifactorial nature of instability in persons with MS. A better understanding of the physiological mechanisms of dynamic instability in persons with MS can be used to improve methods of monitoring disease progression, identifying which impairments to target through interventions, and appropriately evaluating intervention efficacy.

Around 60% of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience falls, however the dynamic balance differences between those who fall and those who don’t are not well understood. The purpose of this study is to identify distinct biomechanical features of dynamic balance during gait that are different between fallers with MS, non-fallers with MS, and healthy controls. 27 recurrent fallers with MS, 28 persons with MS with no falls history, and 27 healthy controls walked on a treadmill at their preferred speed for 3 min. The variability of trunk accelerations and the average and variability of minimum toe clearance, spatiotemporal parameters, and margin of stability were compared between groups. Fallers with MS exhibited a slower cautious gait compared to non-fallers and healthy controls, but had decreased anterior-posterior margin of stability and minimum toe clearance. Fallers walked with less locally stable and predictable trunk accelerations, and increased variability of step length, stride time, and both anterior-posterior and mediolateral margin of stability compared to non-fallers and healthy controls. The present work provides evidence that within a group of persons with MS, there are gait differences that are influenced by falls history. These differences indicate that in persons with MS who fall, the center of mass is poorly controlled through base of support placement and the foot is closer to the ground during swing phase relative to the non-fallers. These identified biomechanical differences could be used to evaluate dynamic balance in persons with MS and to help improve fall prevention strategies.

Knee kinetic asymmetries are present during jump-landings in athletes returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and are associated with an increased risk for sustaining a second ACL injury. The loadsol® is a wireless load sensing insole that can be used in non-laboratory settings. The purpose of this study was to determine if the loadsol® could be used to predict knee extension moment and power symmetry during a bilateral stop jump task in healthy recreational athletes. Forty-two uninjured recreational athletes completed seven bilateral stop jumps. During each landing, the loadsol® (100 Hz) measured plantar load while 3D ground reaction forces (1920 Hz) and lower extremity kinematics (240 Hz) were collected simultaneously. Peak impact force, loading rate, and impulse were quantified using the loadsol® and peak knee extension moment, average knee extension moment, and total knee work was quantified using the laboratory instrumentation. Limb symmetry indices were quantified for each outcome measure. Multivariate backwards regressions were used to determine if loadsol® symmetry could predict knee kinetic symmetry. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine the agreement and error between predicted and actual knee kinetic symmetry. Loadsol® impulse and peak impact force symmetry significantly predicted kinetic knee symmetry and explained 42–61% of its variance. There was good agreement (ICCs = 0.742–0.862) between predicted and actual knee kinetic symmetry, and the error in the predicted outcomes range from ±18 to ±43. These results support using the loadsol® to screen for kinetic symmetries during landing in athletes following ACL reconstruction.