Search

PURPOSE CARTITUDE-1, a phase Ib/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, yielded early, deep, and durable responses at 12 months. Here, we present updated results 2 years after last patient in (median follow-up [MFU] approximately 28 months), including analyses of high-risk patient subgroups. METHODS Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug and had received prior proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee. RESULTS At a MFU of 27.7 months (N = 97), the overall response rate was 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7 to 99.7); 82.5% (95% CI, 73.4 to 89.4) of patients achieved a stringent complete response. Median duration of response was not estimable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached; 27-month PFS and OS rates were 54.9% (95% CI, 44.0 to 64.6) and 70.4% (95% CI, 60.1 to 78.6), respectively. Overall response rates were high across all subgroups (95.1%-100%). Duration of response, PFS, and/or OS were shorter in patients with high-risk cytogenetics, International Staging System stage III, high tumor burden, or plasmacytomas. The safety profile was manageable with no new cilta-cel–related cytokine release syndrome and one new case of parkinsonism (day 914 after cilta-cel) since the last report. CONCLUSION At approximately 28 months MFU, patients treated with cilta-cel maintained deep and durable responses, observed in both standard and high-risk subgroups. The risk/benefit profile of cilta-cel remained favorable with longer follow-up.

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, and now there are two US Food and Drug Administration–approved BCMA-directed CAR T products. However, despite high initial response rates, most patients eventually relapse. The outcomes of patients with disease recurrence after BCMA-directed CAR T have not been comprehensively studied, and such an analysis would help define optimal treatment strategies. We analyzed the salvage treatments and outcomes of 79 patients with multiple myeloma from two academic institutions, who had progression of disease after treatment with BCMA-directed CAR T. A total of 237 post–CAR T salvage treatment lines were used, and patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-10) treatment lines. The median overall survival from the date of relapse post-CAR T therapy was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.0 non-estimable). The overall response rate to the first salvage regimen was 43.4%, with a median progression-free survival of 3.5 months (CI, 2.5-4.6). Thirty-five patients (44.3%) received a T-cell–engaging therapy (bispecific antibody or subsequent CAR T) as salvage treatment. The overall survival in patients who received subsequent T-cell–engaging therapy was not reached after a median follow up of 21.3 months. Patients with multiple myeloma who relapse after BCMA-directed CAR T have a limited prognosis but can be potentially treated with multiple lines of salvage therapy. T-cell–engaging therapies appear to maintain pronounced clinical activity in this setting.

BACKGROUND: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have generated responses in patients with advanced myeloma, but relapses are common. G protein–coupled receptor, class C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) has been identified as an immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Preclinical studies have shown the efficacy of GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells, including activity in a BCMA antigen escape model. METHODS: In this phase 1 dose-escalation study, we administered a GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (MCARH109) at four dose levels to patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma, including patients with relapse after BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were enrolled and received MCARH109 therapy. The maximum tolerated dose was identified at 150×10(6) CAR T cells. At the 450×10(6) CAR T-cell dose, 1 patient had grade 4 cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and 2 patients had a grade 3 cerebellar disorder of unclear cause. No cerebellar disorder, ICANS of any grade, or cytokine release syndrome of grade 3 or higher occurred in the 12 patients who received doses of 25×10(6) to 150×10(6) cells. A response was reported in 71% of the patients in the entire cohort and in 58% of those who received doses of 25×10(6) to 150×10(6) cells. The patients who had a response included those who had received previous BCMA therapies; responses were observed in 7 of 10 such patients in the entire cohort and in 3 of 6 such patients who received 25×10(6) to 150×10(6) cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study of a GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (MCARH109) confirm that GPRC5D is an active immunotherapeutic target in multiple myeloma. (Funded by Juno Therapeutics/Bristol Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04555551.)

Patients treated with cytotoxic therapies, including autologous stem cell transplantation, are at risk for developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms1, 2. Pre-leukemic clones (i.e., clonal hematopoiesis) are detectable years before the development of these aggressive malignancies3-5, though the genomic events leading to transformation and expansion are not well-defined. Here, leveraging distinctive chemotherapy-associated mutational signatures6-12 from whole-genome sequencing data and targeted sequencing of pre-chemotherapy samples, we reconstruct the evolutionary life-history of 39 therapy-related myeloid malignancies. A dichotomy is revealed, in which neoplasms with evidence of chemotherapy-induced mutagenesis from platinum and melphalan are relatively hypermutated and enriched for complex structural variants (i.e., chromothripsis), while neoplasms with alternative exposures bear a similar profile to de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Using chemotherapy-associated mutational signatures as a temporal barcode in each patient’s life, we estimate that several complex events and genomic drivers are acquired after chemotherapy exposure. In the case of treatment with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation, we demonstrate that the procedure allows clonal hematopoiesis to escape chemotherapy exposure entirely, and to be reinfused to expand to malignancy. This information reveals a novel mode of malignant progression for therapy-related malignancies that is not reliant on direct mutagenesis or even exposure to chemotherapy, itself, and prompts further investigation into leukemia-permissive effects of cytotoxic drugs.

Patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) are at risk for therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN). Certain cytotoxic agents introduce mutations within distinct trinucleotide contexts resulting in a unique barcode for each exposed cell. We leveraged mutational signatures to investigate the role of CT in the genomic landscape of tMN with respect to antecedent clonal hematopoiesis (CH). We analyzed 32 tMN and 2 tALL from 33 patients and interrogated for copy number abnormalities (CNA), structural variants (SV), single nucleotide variants (SNV), and mutational signatures. For 7 patients with tMN post-melphalan/ASCT, we investigated antecedent CH using targeted sequencing on pre-melphalan samples, including autograft products. CH variants that became clonal in tumor were seen in 5/7 pre-melphalan/ASCT samples (TP53, RUNX1, NCOR1, NF1, CREBBP, DNMT3A, and PPM1D). Complex SV were seen in 7 tMNs; including chromothripsis in 6 (19.4%). In 4 cases, chromothripsis involved chromosome 19 with hyper-amplification of the SMARCA4 locus (≥5 copies). Mutational signature analysis revealed 6 known single base substitution (SBS) signatures in tMN including melphalan (SBS-MM1) and platinum signatures (SBS31, SBS35, and E-SBS37). TMNs with CT signatures had higher mutation burden than those without (p = 0.004). 17 patients with exposure to agents other than melphalan/platinum did not have increased mutational burden with respect to de novo AML (TCGA; NEJM, 2013). All patients with prior platinum exposure (including tALL, n=9) had platinum SBS signatures while only 2 of 7 patients with prior melphalan/ASCT had a melphalan signature (SBS-MM1). Detection of CT signatures in bulk sequencing relies on one cell, with its barcode of mutations, to expand to clonal dominance. Given pre-existent CH, including in 3/3 autograft products, absence of a CT signature despite melphalan exposure implies progression by a clone that escaped CT exposure with stem-cell collection and reinfusion. Conversely, all platinum-exposed tAML had signature evidence of exposure confirming existence of CH prior to exposure and supporting post-CT single-cell expansion. TMNs from 3 patients exposed to sequential platinum and melphalan/ASCT had platinum but not melphalan signatures confirming single-cell expansion of the pre-tMN CH clone post-platinum but with escape from exposure to melphalan via leukapheresis. Chromothripsis events bore only non-duplicated CT-induced mutations, indicative of acquisition prior to, and not directly caused by, CT exposure. These disparities suggest that ASCT provides a mechanism for CH clones to escape CT and re-engraft with transplant. Coupled with driver events accrued prior to CT, this suggest that CT-induced mutagenesis may be less important than other factors, such as CT-induced immunosuppression, in the expansion of pre-TMN CH clones. Citation Format: Benjamin Diamond, Bachisio Ziccheddu, Eileen M. Boyle, Kylee Maclachlan, Justin Taylor, Justin M. Watts, Sydney X. Lu, David G. Coffey, Niccolo Bolli, Elli Papaemmanuil, Kelly Bolton, Jae H. Park, Heather Landau, Karuna Ganesh, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Stephen Nimer, David J. Chung, Caleb H. Ho, Mikhail Roshal, Alexander Lesokhin, Gareth Morgan, Ola Landgren, Francesco Maura. Chemotherapy-related mutational signatures reveal the origins of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5747.

Background CD47 is an innate immune checkpoint that binds signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) and delivers a "don't eat me" signal to suppress macrophage phagocytosis. Overexpression of CD47 serves as a mechanism of immune surveillance evasion, and is associated with poor prognosis in both hematologic and solid malignancies. TTI-622 is a fusion protein consisting of the CD47-binding domain of human SIRPα linked to the Fc region of human IgG4. It is designed to enhance phagocytosis and antitumor activity by preventing CD47 from delivering its inhibitory signal as well as generating a moderate pro-phagocytic signal via IgG4 Fc. Importantly, unlike many CD47-blocking agents, TTI-622 does not bind to human red blood cells. Methods This is an ongoing multicenter, Phase 1a/1b dose-escalation and expansion trial of TTI-622 (NCT03530683). Based on a modified 3+3 scheme, dose escalation proceeded through 8 dose levels ranging from 0.05 to 18 mg/kg weekly dosing in patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) lymphomas. Testing of every two and three week schedules of single agent TTI-622 at doses up to 24 mg/kg is ongoing. Safety monitoring includes clinical laboratories and assessments of adverse events (AEs) based on CTCAE v 4.03. Results As of April 12, 2021, 42 patients (18M/24F) with a median age of 67 years (range 24-86) have received dose levels of 0.05−18 mg/kg weekly TTI-622. Lymphoma histologies enrolled include diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=19), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma - mycosis fungoides (CTCL-MF; n=6), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; n=6), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; n=5), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n=4). Additional histologies with single patients only accounted for the remaining 2 patients. Disease stages at entry have been III or IV in 38 patients and median prior systemic therapies of 3 (range 1-9) have been received, including CAR-T and HSCT in 9 and 10 patients, respectively. One additional patient with Erdheim-Chester disease initially diagnosed as lymphoma is included in the safety analysis only. Treatment-related AEs have occurred in 20 (47%) patients; most AEs have been Grade 1 or 2 and reversible. The most frequent treatment-related AEs include thrombocytopenia (n=9, 21%), neutropenia (n=5, 12%), and anemia and fatigue (n=4 each, 9%). Related adverse events of Grade ≥ 3 intensity include thrombocytopenia (n=2, 5%; 1 each Grade 3 & 4), neutropenia (n=4, 9%; all Grade 3), and anemia (n=1, 2%; Grade 3). These Grade 3 and 4 hematologic events occurred in dose levels ranging from 0.8 to 18 mg/kg without apparent dose relationship. Mild to moderate platelet decreases seen in the majority of patients generally occurred on dosing days and recovered quickly to baseline levels. Preliminary PK results suggest dose-dependent increases in exposure following both single and repeated TTI-622 infusions. A total of 27 patients were response-evaluable at dose levels ≥0.8 mg/kg at the time of the data-cut. Objective responses have been achieved in 9 patients, including 2 complete responses (CR) - 1 in DLBCL (0.8 mg/kg) and 1 in CTCL (18 mg/kg) - and 7 partial responses (PR) - 2 in CTCL (both 8 mg/kg), 2 in PTCL (2 and 12 mg/kg), 2 in DLBCL (4 and 18 mg/kg), and 1 in FL (8 mg/kg). Initial responses were achieved at the first disease assessment (week 8) in all 9 responders. In the dose range of 0.8-18 mg/kg, objective responses occurred in 33% (9/27) of response-evaluable patients. At the time of the data cut-off 4 responders were active on treatment; both patients with CR, ongoing 22+ months (0.8 mg/kg) and 12 weeks on an every three week dosing schedule (18 mg/kg). Two patients with PR were ongoing 18 weeks (12 mg/kg) and 11 weeks (18 mg/kg). Conclusions Results to date in patients with r/r lymphomas indicate that weekly doses of single agent TTI-622 up to 18 mg/kg are well tolerated. TTI-622 has shown activity in r/r lymphoma with objective responses across a broad dose range (0.8-18 mg/kg), in highly pre-treated patients, across multiple histologies, and with onset of action consistently observed at the first response assessment at Week 8. The study is ongoing evaluating single agent TTI-622 in every two and three week schedules. Updated data including additional patients will be presented at the conference. Based on these results demonstrating promising single-agent activity as well as good tolerability, TTI-622 is currently being investigated in combination regimens in a range of hematologic malignancies. Disclosures Patel: Xencor: Research Funding; Velos Bio: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Curis, Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Zonder: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy. Lesokhin: pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Iteos: Consultancy; bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. von Keudell: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Lai: Macrogenics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramchandren: curis: Research Funding; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MERCK: Consultancy, Research Funding; pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding. Catalano: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Lin: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Uger: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Petrova: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Molloy: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Bruns: Trillium Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

Introduction: Treatment combinations involving CD38 targeted monoclonal antibodies have significantly prolonged the median duration and depth of response in myeloma (MM), reflected in minimal residual disease-negativity (MRD-) rates of over 70% in newly diagnosed patients (Landgren et al. JAMA Onc 2021). Key to improving our understanding of treatment failures is the combined use of single cell analysis of the microenvironment with genome wide assessment of tumor genetics to decipher the mechanisms of disease resistance. Methods: We isolated malignant plasma cells from bone marrow (BM) samples using CD138+magnetic or flow (CD38, CD138, and CD45) sorting from 60 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with KRd with daratumumab (D-KRd n=46; NCT03290950) and without daratumumab combination therapy (KRd, n=14; NCT01402284). Fifty-five baseline samples underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS), median coverage of 80x using somatic DNA as a normal comparator. The BM cellular content of 22 patients (44 samples-5 failed) treated with D-KRd (10 MRD+ and 12 MRD-) underwent 5'single cell RNA-sequencing with an additional capture of the TCR and surface protein markers (CITEseq) to interrogate the single cell composition of the immune microenvironment at baseline (T1, n=20) and at the end of induction (T2, n=19). Paired (T1/T2) single-cell data were obtained in 17 patients and paired WGS and single cell data (T1) were available in 15 patients. MRD-, sustained MRD- (defined as two MRD- results, the first at the end of the induction (T2) and the subsequent at the first year of follow-up (T3)) and progression/loss of MRD- were used as clinical endpoints for this study. Results: After a median follow up of 29 months, 36 (54%) patients achieved MRD-; 34 (51%) had sustained MRD- >1 year after completion of combination therapy. Overall, 10 (15%) patients had clinical progression and two conversions from MRD- to MRD+. A comprehensive catalogue of MM-genomic events associated with these three clinical endpoints was defined. Deletion (del) 13, biallelic loss CYLD, del XBP1, del 20q13.12 (CD40), and 8q gains were associated with MRD+ and failure to achieve sustained MRD-. Presence of del RPL5 and multiple chromothripsis events significantly correlated with early progression and loss of MRD-. Interestingly, structural variants (SV) involving IKFZ3 were seen in all three negative clinical endpoints (p We interrogated the BM microenvironment at baseline and correlated its composition with the tumor genomic architecture. Across 15 evaluable patients, del XBP1 were associated with fewer memory B-cells (p=0.03), naïve B-cell (p=0.01) and dendritic cells (p=0.03) compared to the wild type. Also, low dendritic cell at baseline cases were observed in patients with del 20q13.12 (CD40) (p=0.03). Interestingly, low level of plasmacytoid dendritic cells at baseline was associated with failure to achieve MRD- and sustained MRD-. Patients with 6p24 amplification showed a reduced number of CD8 effectors 1 and 2 (p When comparing baseline (T1) and end of induction (T2), significant differences were seen between sustained MRD+ and MRD-. We identified significantly depleted NK, and naïve and memory B-cell after D-KRd MRD- patients had significantly more CD14+ monocytes both at T1 and T2 than their MRD+ counterparts (Fig. 1). Differential expression suggests that inflammatory response genes including IL1B are upregulated in the absence of sustained MRD- whereas genes implicated in IL2, IL6, and IFNα response as well as adipocyte differentiation are associated with sustained MRD response. Conclusion: We show, for the first time, evidence of complex interplay between MM tumor genetics and the microenvironment in the context of D-KRd treated patients. Our results highlight the importance of genomic-based mechanisms in the persistence of disease (IKZF3, XBP1) as well as heterogeneity in the composition of the BM microenvironment, with the monocytes pointing towards the importance of inflammation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Maura: OncLive: Honoraria; Medscape: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hassoun: Celgene, Takeda, Janssen: Research Funding. Mailankody: Jansen Oncology: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Juno: Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Evicore: Consultancy. Hultcrantz: Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Scordo: Omeros Corporation: Consultancy; i3 Health: Other: Speaker; Kite - A Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Angiocrine Bioscience: Consultancy, Research Funding; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Kazandjian: Arcellx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Janssen Pharmaceutica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Landau: Takeda, Janssen, Caelum Biosciences, Celgene, Pfizer, Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria. Giralt: SANOFI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSENN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinnum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dogan: Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Peer View: Honoraria. Lesokhin: Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Iteos: Consultancy; Genetech: Research Funding; bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy; Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties. Davies: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Korde: Amgen: Research Funding; Medimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landgren: Janssen: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: IDMC; GSK: Honoraria.

Background: Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is a type I membrane protein that is expressed exclusively in the B-cell lineage, and at a higher level on myeloma cells than on normal B cells. Cevostamab is a FcRH5xCD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb) that facilitates T cell-directed killing of myeloma cells. Initial data from the dose-escalation phase of the ongoing Phase I study (NCT03275103) of cevostamab monotherapy in patients (pts) with heavily pre-treated RRMM demonstrated promising activity and manageable safety, along with near ubiquitous FcRH5 expression on myeloma cells (Cohen et al. ASH 2020; Sumiyoshi et al. EHA 2021). We present updated safety and efficacy data from a larger cohort of pts, including results comparing Cycle (C) 1 single step-up (SS) and double step-up (DS) dosing for the mitigation of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Methods: Participants have RRMM for which no established therapy is available or appropriate. Cevostamab (intravenous infusion) is administered in 21-day cycles. In the SS cohorts, the step dose (0.05-3.6mg) is given on C1 Day (D) 1 and the target dose (0.15-198mg) on C1D8. In the DS cohorts, the step doses are given on C1D1 (0.3-1.2mg) and C1D8 (3.6mg), and the target dose (60-160mg) on C1D15. In both regimens, the target dose is given on D1 of subsequent cycles. Cevostamab is continued for a total of 17 cycles, unless progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurs. CRS is reported using ASTCT criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019). Results: At data cut-off (18 May 2021), 160 pts had been enrolled (median age: 64 years, range: 33-82 years; male: 58.1%); 21.3% of pts had extramedullary disease. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 6 (range: 2-18). Most pts (85.0%) were triple-class refractory (PI, IMiD, anti-CD38 antibody). 28 pts (17.5%) had received ≥1 prior CAR-T, 13 pts (8.1%) ≥1 prior BsAb, 27 pts (16.9%) ≥1 prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and 54 pts (33.8%) ≥1 prior anti-BCMA targeting agent. Median follow-up in exposed pts was 6.1 months. Almost all had ≥1 adverse event (Table). The most common was CRS (128/160 pts [80.0%]; Grade [Gr] 1: 42.5%; Gr 2: 36.3%; Gr 3: 1.3%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) associated with CRS was observed in 21 pts (13.1%) and in 34/211 (16.1%) CRS events (Gr 1: 8.5%; Gr 2: 6.2%; Gr 3: 1.4%). Most CRS events occurred in C1 (87.2%), arose within 24 hours of cevostamab administration (70.5%), and resolved within 48 hours of onset (83.4%). In the pts with CRS, tocilizumab was used for CRS management in 43.8% and steroids in 25.8% (both agents: 18.0%). In SS dose-escalation (68 pts), 3.6mg was chosen as the most effective C1D1 SS dose for limiting CRS in C1, with no target dose-dependent increase in the rate or severity of CRS observed after the C1D8 administration. Likewise, in DS dose-escalation (30 pts), 0.3/3.6mg was identified as the preferred C1D1/C1D8 DS dose for limiting CRS in C1. Notably, the overall rate of CRS was lower in the pts who received the 0.3/3.6mg/target DS regimen than in those who received the 3.6mg/target SS regimen (77.3% [34/44] vs 88.2% [75/85], respectively). The rate of ICANS associated with CRS was also lower in the 0.3/3.6mg/target DS cohort than in the 3.6mg/target SS cohort (4.5% [2/44] vs 21.2% [18/85], respectively). At data cut-off, 158/160 pts were efficacy evaluable. In dose-escalation, responses were observed at the 20-198mg target dose levels, and data suggested a target dose-dependent increase in clinical efficacy. Median time to response was 29 days (range: 20-179 days). Two dose-expansion cohorts were opened: ORR was higher at the 160mg dose level (54.5%, 24/44 pts) than at the 90mg dose level (36.7%, 22/60). At target dose levels >90mg, ORRs in pts with prior exposure to CAR-Ts, BsAbs, ADCs, and anti-BCMA targeting agents were 44.4% (4/9 pts), 33.3% (3/9), 50.0% (7/14), and 36.4% (8/22) respectively. Median follow-up among all responders (n=61) was 8.1 months; estimated median duration of response was 15.6 months (95% CI: 6.4, 21.6). Conclusions: Cevostamab monotherapy continues to show clinically meaningful activity in a large cohort of pts with heavily pre-treated RRMM, with a target dose-dependent increase in ORR, but no increase in CRS rate. Responses appear durable, and are observed in pts with prior exposure to CAR-Ts, BsAbs, and ADCs. Compared with SS dosing, DS dosing at the 0.3/3.6mg level appears to be associated with a trend for an improved C1 safety profile. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Trudel: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Cohen: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Krishnan: MAGENTA: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; City of Hope Cancer Center: Current Employment; REGENERON: Consultancy; SANOFI: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Fonseca: Kite: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; OncoTracker: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Consultancy; Caris Life Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Patent: Prognosticaton of myeloma via FISH: Patents & Royalties; AbbVie: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Scientific Advisory Board: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Mayo Clinic in Arizona: Current Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Spencer: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berdeja: Bluebird bio, BMS, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, SecuraBio, Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen: Research Funding; EMD Sorono, Genentech: Research Funding; Celularity, CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK, Ichnos Sciences, Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly, Novartis: Research Funding; Poseida, Sanofi, Teva: Research Funding. Lesokhin: Serametrix, Inc: Patents & Royalties; Behringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Iteos: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; bristol myers squibb: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Consultancy. Forsberg: University of Colorado: Current Employment; Karyopharm, Sanofi, Genentech: Research Funding. Costa: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rodriguez-Otero: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Regeneron: Honoraria; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Current Employment. Kaedbey: Takeda, Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS, Janssen: Honoraria; Royal Victoria Hospital Lakeshore Hospital: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Jewish General Hospital - McGill University: Current Employment. Richter: Janssen, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive biotechnologies: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Karyopharm, Antengene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tisch Cancer Institute: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: Current Employment. Mateos: Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sea-Gen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Thomas: Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding. Wong: Genentech: Current Employment; CTMX, UBX, BMRN: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li: Genentech/Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Choeurng: Genentech: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vaze: Roche/Genentech: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Samineni: Genentech: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Sumiyoshi: Genentech: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Cooper: Genentech: Current Employment; Roche: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Harrison: Haemalogix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/ Juno/ BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Terumo BCT: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Cevostamab is a FcRH5xCD3 bispecific antibody that facilitates T cell-directed killing of myeloma cells. Cevostamab is an investigational agent.