Search

Objectives To investigate ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetics (PK) in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of muscle and subcutaneous tissue and establish a population PK model. Methods Eight healthy volunteers received four IV doses of 1000/500 mg ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h in a prospective, open-labelled PK study. ISF concentration–time profiles were determined via in vivo microdialysis up to 8 h post-dose and efficacy of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam was estimated using the time above MIC (%ƒT>MIC) and time above threshold concentration (%T>CT), respectively. A population PK model was established by merging derived plasma and soft tissue PK data. Results Ceftolozane reached %ƒT>MIC values of 100% in plasma, muscle and subcutaneous ISF for Enterobacteriaceae and 87%, 89% and 87%, respectively, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Tazobactam %T>CT was 21%, 22% and 21% in plasma, muscle and subcutaneous ISF, respectively. Plasma protein binding was 6.3% for ceftolozane and 8.0% for tazobactam. Multiple-dose ceftolozane AUC0–8 ISF/plasma ratios were 0.92 ± 0.17 in muscle and 0.88 ± 0.18 in subcutis, and tazobactam ratios were 0.89 ± 0.25 in muscle and 0.87 ± 0.21 in subcutis, suggesting substantial soft tissue penetration. Conclusions Tazobactam %T>CT values were distinctly below proposed target values, indicating that tazobactam might be underdosed in the investigated drug combination. However, ISF/unbound plasma ratios of ceftolozane and tazobactam support their use in soft tissue infections. A plasma and soft tissue PK model adds important information on the PK profile of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Further investigations in patients suffering from wound infections are needed to confirm these findings.

Background The broad antibacterial spectrum of piperacillin/tazobactam makes the combination suitable for the treatment of nosocomial bacterial central nervous system (CNS) infections. As limited data are available regarding piperacillin CNS exposure in patients without or with low-grade inflammation, a clinical study was conducted (1) to quantify CNS exposure of piperacillin by cerebral microdialysis and (2) to evaluate different dosing regimens in order to improve probability of target attainment (PTA) in brain. Methods Ten acute hemorrhagic stroke patients (subarachnoid hemorrhage, n = 6; intracerebral hemorrhage, n = 4) undergoing multimodality neuromonitoring received 4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam every 8 h by 30-min infusions for the management of healthcare-associated pneumonia. Cerebral microdialysis was performed as part of the clinical neuromonitoring routine, and brain interstitial fluid samples were retrospectively analyzed for piperacillin concentrations after the first and after multiple doses for at least 5 days and quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulations with various doses and types of infusions were performed to predict exposure. A T>MIC of 50% was selected as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target parameter. Results Median peak concentrations of unbound piperacillin in brain interstitial space fluid were 1.16 (range 0.08–3.59) and 2.78 (range 0.47–7.53) mg/L after the first dose and multiple doses, respectively. A one-compartment model with a transit compartment and a lag time (for the first dose) between systemic and brain exposure was appropriate to describe the brain concentrations. Bootstrap median estimates of the parameters were: transfer rate from plasma to brain (0.32 h−1), transfer rate from brain to plasma (7.31 h−1), and lag time [2.70 h (coefficient of variation 19.7%)]. The simulations suggested that PTA would exceed 90% for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) up to 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L at a dose of 12–16 and 24 g/day, respectively, regardless of type of infusion. For higher MICs, PTA dropped significantly. Conclusion Limited CNS exposure of piperacillin might be an obstacle in treating patients without general meningeal inflammation except for infections with highly susceptible pathogens. Brain exposure of piperacillin did not improve significantly with a prolongation of infusions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-00947-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background and objective: Tigecycline, a broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, is approved for use at a fixed dose irrespective of body weight. However, its pharmacokinetics may be altered in obesity, which would impact on the antibiotic's effectiveness. The objective of this study was to investigate the plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentrations of tigecycline in obese patients compared with those in a non-obese control group. Methods: Fifteen obese patients (one class II and 14 class III) undergoing bariatric surgery and 15 non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery (mainly tumour resection) received a single dose of 50 or 100 mg tigecycline as an intravenous short infusion. Tigecycline concentrations were measured up to 8 h after dosing in plasma (total concentration), in ultrafiltrate of plasma (free concentration), and in microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue, respectively. Results: In obese patients, total peak plasma concentration (1.31 ± 0.50 vs 2.27 ± 1.40 mg/L) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC8h,plasma: 2.15 ± 0.42 vs 2.74 ± 0.73 h⋅mg/L), as normalized to a 100 mg dose, were significantly lower compared with those of non-obese patients. No significant differences were observed regarding the free plasma concentration, as determined by ultrafiltration, or the corresponding AUC8h (fAUC8h,plasma). Concentrations in interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous tissue were lower than the free plasma concentrations in both groups, and they were lower in obese compared to non-obese patients: the AUC8h in ISF (AUC8h,ISF) was 0.51 ± 0.22 h⋅mg/L in obese and 0.79 ± 0.23 h⋅mg/L in non-obese patients, resulting in a relative tissue drug exposure (AUC8h,ISF/fAUC8h,plasma) of 0.38 ± 0.19 and 0.63 ± 0.24, respectively. Conclusion: Following a single dose of tigecycline, concentrations in the ISF of subcutaneous adipose tissue are decreased in heavily obese subjects, calling for an increased loading dose. Eu clinical trials registration number: EudraCT No. 2012-004383-22.

Cefazolin (CFZ) plus metronidazole (MTZ) is commonly used for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. An HPLC-UV method is described for the simultaneous determination of total or free cefazolin and metronidazole in human plasma or in microdialysate of subcutaneous tissue. Separation was performed isocratically using a reversed phase column and phosphate buffer/acetonitrile as mobile phase. The validation characteristics were similar for both drugs. Linearity has been shown down to 0.1 mg/L (R > 0.9990). Intra- and inter-assay precision (CV) and in-accuracy were < 5%. The method was applied to the determination of cefazolin and metronidazole in plasma and microdialysate of surgical patients following 30-min intravenous infusion of cefazolin/metronidazole 2.0/0.5 g.

Precision dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in obese patients is compromised by sparse information on target-site exposure. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of current and alternative piperacillin/tazobactam dosages in obese and nonobese patients. Based on a prospective, controlled clinical trial in 30 surgery patients (15 obese/15 nonobese, 0.5-h infusion of 4 g/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam), piperacillin pharmacokinetics were characterized in plasma and at target-site (interstitial fluid of subcutaneous adipose tissue) via population analysis. Thereafter, multiple 3–4-times daily piperacillin/tazobactam short-term/prolonged (recommended by EUCAST) and continuous infusions were evaluated by simulation. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target-attainment (PTA ≥ 90%) based on time unbound piperacillin concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) during 24 h (%fT&gt, MIC). Lower piperacillin target-site maximum concentrations in obese versus nonobese patients were explained by the impact of lean (approximately two thirds) and fat body mass (approximately one third) on volume of distribution. Simulated steady-state concentrations were 1.43-times, 95%CI = (1.27, 1.61), higher in plasma versus target-site, supporting targets of %fT&gt, 2×MIC instead of %fT&gt, 4×MIC during continuous infusion to avoid target-site concentrations constantly below MIC. In all obesity and renally impairment/hyperfiltration stages, at MIC = 16 mg/L, adequate PTA required prolonged (thrice-daily 4 g/0.5 g over 3.0 h at %fT&gt, MIC = 50) or continuous infusions (24 g/3 g over 24 h following loading dose at %fT&gt, MIC = 98) of piperacillin/tazobactam.

Objectives To assess plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery. Patients and methods Fifteen obese and 15 non-obese patients received an IV short infusion of 2 g cefazolin and 0.5 g metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis. Plasma and microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue were sampled until 8 h after dosing. Drug concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated non-compartmentally. Results In obese patients (BMI 39.5–69.3 kg/m2) compared with non-obese patients (BMI 18.7–29.8 kg/m2), mean Cmax of total cefazolin in plasma was lower (115 versus 174 mg/L) and Vss was higher (19.4 versus 14.2 L). The mean differences in t½ (2.7 versus 2.4 h), CL (5.14 versus 4.63 L/h) and AUC∞ (402 versus 450 mg·h/L) were not significant. The influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole was similar (Cmax 8.99 versus 14.7 mg/L, Vss 73.9 versus 51.8 L, t½ 11.9 versus 9.1 h, CL 4.62 versus 4.13 L/h, AUC∞ 116 versus 127 mg·h/L). Regarding interstitial fluid (ISF), mean concentrations of cefazolin remained >4 mg/L until 6 h in both groups, and those of metronidazole up to 8 h in the non-obese group. In obese patients, the mean ISF concentrations of metronidazole were between 3 and 3.5 mg/L throughout the measuring interval. Conclusions During the time of surgery, cefazolin concentrations in plasma and ISF of subcutaneous tissue were lower in obese patients, but not clinically relevant. Regarding metronidazole, the respective differences were higher, and may influence dosing of metronidazole for perioperative prophylaxis in obese patients.

Background: This controlled clinical study aimed to investigate the impact of obesity on plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of meropenem. Methods: Obese (body mass index (BMI) &ge, 35 kg/m2) and age-/sex-matched nonobese (18.5 kg/m2 &ge, BMI &le, 30 kg/m2) surgical patients received a short-term infusion of 1000-mg meropenem. Concentrations were determined via high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) in the plasma and microdialysate from the interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous tissue up to eight h after dosing. An analysis was performed in the plasma and ISF by noncompartmental methods. Results: The maximum plasma concentrations in 15 obese (BMI 49 &plusmn, 11 kg/m2) and 15 nonobese (BMI 24 &plusmn, 2 kg/m2) patients were 54.0 vs. 63.9 mg/L (95% CI for difference: &minus, 18.3 to &minus, 3.5). The volume of distribution was 22.4 vs. 17.6 L, (2.6&ndash, 9.1), but the clearance was comparable (12.5 vs. 11.1 L/h, &minus, 1.4 to 3.1), leading to a longer half-life (1.52 vs. 1.31 h, 0.05&ndash, 0.37) and fairly similar area under the curve (AUC)8h (78.7 vs. 89.2 mg*h/L, &minus, 21.4 to 8.6). In the ISF, the maximum concentrations differed significantly (12.6 vs. 18.6 L, &minus, 16.8 to &minus, 0.8) but not the AUC8h (28.5 vs. 42.0 mg*h/L, &minus, 33.9 to 5.4). Time above the MIC (T &gt, MIC) in the plasma and ISF did not differ significantly for MICs of 0.25&ndash, 8 mg/L. Conclusions: In morbidly obese patients, meropenem has lower maximum concentrations and higher volumes of distribution. However, due to the slightly longer half-life, obesity has no influence on the T &gt, MIC, so dose adjustments for obesity seem unnecessary.

The antibacterial effect of antibiotics is linked to the free drug concentration. This study investigated the applicability of an ultrafiltration method to determine free plasma concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics in ICU patients.Eligible patients included adult ICU patients treated with ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), piperacillin (PIP)/tazobactam (TAZ), or flucloxacillin (FXN) by continuous infusion. Up to 2 arterial blood samples were drawn at steady state. Patients could be included more than once if they received another antibiotic. Free drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection after ultrafiltration, using a method that maintained physiological conditions (pH 7.4/37°C). Total drug concentrations were determined to calculate the unbound fraction. In a post-hoc analysis, free concentrations were compared with the target value of 4× the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a worst-case scenario for empirical therapy with CAZ, MEM or PIP/tazobactam and against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus for targeted therapy with FXN.Fifty different antibiotic treatment periods in 38 patients were evaluated. The concentrations of the antibiotics showed a wide range because of the fixed dosing regimen in a mixed population with variable kidney function. The mean unbound fractions (fu) of CAZ, MEM, and PIP were 102.5%, 98.4%, and 95.7%, with interpatient variability of6%. The mean fu of FXN was 11.6%, with interpatient variability of 39%. It was observed that 2 of 12 free concentrations of CAZ, 1 of 40 concentrations of MEM, and 11 of 23 concentrations of PIP were below the applied target concentration of 4 × ECOFF for P. aeruginosa. All concentrations of FXN (9 samples from 6 patients) were8 × ECOFF for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.For therapeutic drug monitoring purposes, measuring total or free concentrations of CAZ, MEM, or PIP is seemingly adequate. For highly protein-bound beta-lactams such as FXN, free concentrations should be favored in ICU patients with prevalent hypoalbuminemia.

Ultrafiltration is a rapid and convenient method to determine the free concentrations of drugs in plasma. Several ultrafiltration devices based on Eppendorf cups are commercially available, but are not validated for such use by the manufacturer. Plasma pH, temperature and relative centrifugal force as well as membrane type can influence the results. In the present work, we developed an ultrafiltration method in order to determine the free concentrations of linezolid or fluconazole, both neutral and moderately lipophilic antiinfective drugs for parenteral as well as oral administration, in plasma of patients. Whereas both substances behaved relatively insensitive in human plasma regarding variations in pH (7.0-8.5), temperature (5-37°C) or relative centrifugal force (1000-10.000xg), losses of linezolid were observed with the Nanosep Omega device due to adsorption onto the polyethersulfone membrane (unbound fraction 75% at 100mg/L and 45% at 0.1mg/L, respectively). No losses were observed with Vivacon which is equipped with a membrane of regenerated cellulose. With fluconazole no differences between Nanosep and Vivacon were observed. Applying standard conditions (pH 7.4/37°C/1000xg/20min), the mean unbound fraction of linezolid in pooled plasma from healthy volunteers was 81.5±2.8% using Vivacon, that of fluconazole was 87.9±3.5% using Nanosep or 89.4±3.3% using Vivacon. The unbound fraction of linezolid was 85.4±3.7% in plasma samples from surgical patients and 92.1±6.2% in ICU patients, respectively. The unbound fraction of fluconazole was 93.9±3.3% in plasma samples from ICU patients.

Background Ceftolozane is a novel cephalosporin and commercially available in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam under the brand name Zerbaxa. Cephalosporins exhibits, like all betalactams, a time-dependent antibacterial action. The concentration of the antibiotic at the site of infection should exceed the MIC of the underlying pathogen for at least 60%–70% of the dosing interval. According to the German prescribing information, Zerbaxa is administered as a short infusion in sodium chloride 0.9% or glucose 5%. However, clinical studies suggest that prolonged or continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics can improve therapy success, especially in intensive care patients. Purpose At present, there is insufficient data on the stability of ceftolozan/tazobactam in infusion solution for continuous infusion. German product information provides data on the stability under conditions of cooling (2°C–8°C) and light protection. Therefore, a stability test was carried out for 24 hours under real-world conditions. Material and methods Solutions of ceftolozan/tazobactam (20/10 mg/L and 10/5 mg/L) in sodium chloride 0.9% and glucose 5%, respectively, were stored at room temperature for 24 hours without protection from light. Concentrations of ceftolozan/tazobactam were analysed at the start of the experiment and 1, 4, 8 and 24 hours thereafter using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. In addition, at each analysis time point the solutions were visually examined and the pH values were determined. Results Ceftolozan/tazobactam concentrations were stable for at least 24 hours (>98.5% of baseline) at both concentrations regardless of the used carrier solution. Visual appearance and pH values remained unchanged. Conclusion Zerbaxa is stable in sodium chloride 0.9% and glucose 5% at room temperature for at least 24 hours and is therefore suitable for prolonged or continuous infusion. References and/or acknowledgements None.

The need for pharmacokinetic knowledge about antibiotics directly at the site of infection, typically the interstitial space fluid (ISF) of tissues, is gaining acceptance for effective and safe treatment. One option to acquire such data is the microdialysis technique employing a catheter with a semipermeable membrane inserted directly in the ISF. A prerequisite is catheter calibration, e.g. via retrodialysis, yielding a conversion factor from measured to true ISF concentrations, termed relative recovery. This value can be influenced by various factors. The present investigation assessed the impact of three of them on relative recovery using seven drugs: (I) drug combinations/order, (II) air in the microdialysis system, (III) flow rate changes inherent when using common in vivo microdialysis pumps. All experiments were performed in a standardised in vitro microdialysis system. (I) Relative recovery of single antibiotics (linezolid, meropenem, cefazolin, metronidazole, tigecycline) was determined in microdialysis and retrodialysis settings and compared with values using either antibiotic or antibiotic+analgesic (acetaminophen and metamizole) combinations or single drugs with reversed microdialysis order. For assessing these factors for lower relative recovery values (as in in vivo), these were mimicked by increasing the flow rate for linezolid. (II) For the impact of air, linezolid relative recovery of freshly carbonated solutions was compared to degassed ones in microdialysis and retrodialysis settings. For each condition in (I) and (II), summary statistics of relative recovery were calculated and for the impact of the factors a linear mixed-effect model developed. (III) From samples taken during an automatic flush sequence (15 μL/min) of an in vivo pump and afterwards switching to the flow rate of 1 and 2 μL/min for 120 min, the time necessary for relative recovery to reach equilibrium was determined. (I) High relative recovery values (flow rate 2 μL/min: ≥84%; flow rate 5 μL/min: ≥65%) were observed for all investigated single drugs. Intra- and intercatheter variability ranged from 0.3%–11% and 3%–25%, respectively. Based on these values and on the statistical model, the impact of drug combination versus single drug as well as of reversed order was small with changes in relative recovery of smaller equal 9%. (II) Compared to degassed solutions, relative recovery in carbonated solutions was 23% and 19% lower (relative reduction) in the microdialysis and retrodialysis setting, respectively, with increased intercatheter variability (up to 37%). (III) As expected, relative recovery increased after the flush sequence and was constant 10–15 min after the switch to the typical 1 and 2 μL/min flow rate. Given the intercatheter variability, combinations and the order of drugs showed minor but clinically negligible impact on relative recovery. In contrast, air in the microdialysis catheter/system caused falsely low and inconsistent relative recovery values and must be avoided when performing a trial. Also changes in flow rate at the end of pump flush sequence impacted relative recovery. Hence, a sufficient equilibration time of 10–15 min prior to sampling should be implemented in sampling protocols. In vitro microdialysis presents a highly valuable complementary platform to clinical microdialysis studies impacting the design, sampling schedule and data analysis of such trials to gain knowledge of target-site pharmacokinetics for contributing to better informed decisions in the individual patient/special populations in future.

Objective Target-site concentrations obtained via the catheter-based minimally invasive microdialysis technique often exhibit high variability. Catheter calibration is commonly performed via retrodialysis, in which a transformation factor, termed relative recovery (RR), is determined. Leveraging RR values from a rich data set of a very large clinical microdialysis study, promised to contribute critical insight into the origin of the reportedly high target-site variability. The present work aimed (i) to quantify and explain variability in RR associated with the patient (including non-obese vs. obese) and the catheter, and (ii) to derive recommendations on the design of future clinical microdialysis studies. Methods A prospective, age- and sex-matched parallel group, single-centre trial in non-obese and obese patients (BMI=18.7-86.9 kg/m2) was performed. 1-3 RR values were obtained in the interstitial fluid of the subcutaneous fat tissue in one catheter per upper arm of 120 patients via the retrodialysis method (nRR=1008) for a panel of drugs (linezolid, meropenem, tigecycline, cefazolin, fosfomycin, piperacillin and acetaminophen). A linear mixed-effects model was developed to quantify the different types of variability in RR and to explore the association between RR and patient body size descriptors. Results Estimated RR was highest for acetaminophen (69.7%, 95%CI=65.0% to 74.3%) and lowest for piperacillin (40.4%, 95%CI=34.6% to 46.0%). The linear mixed-effects modelling analysis showed that variability associated with the patient (σ=15.9%) was the largest contributor (46.7%) to overall variability, whereas the contribution of variability linked to the catheter (σ=5.55%) was ~1/6 (16.8%). The relative contribution of residual unexplained variability (σ=12.0%, including intracatheter variability) was ~1/3 (36.4%). The limits of agreement of repeated RR determinations in a single catheter ranged from 0.694-1.64-fold (linezolid) to 0.510-3.02-fold (cefazolin). Calculated fat mass affected RR, explaining the observed lower RR in obese (ΔRRmean= -29.7% relative reduction) versus non-obese patients (p Conclusions Three recommendations for clinical microdialysis trial design were derived: 1) High interindividual variability underscored the necessity of measuring individual RR per patient. 2) The low relative contribution of intercatheter variability to overall variability indicated that measuring RR with a single catheter per patient is sufficient for reliable catheter calibration. 3) The wide limits of agreement from multiple RR in the same catheter implied an uncertainty of a factor of two in target-site drug concentration estimation necessitating to perform catheter calibration (retrodialysis sampling) multiple times per patient. To allow routine clinical use of microdialysis, research efforts should aim at further understanding and minimising the method-related variability. Optimised study designs in clinical trials will ultimately yield more informative microdialysis data and increase our understanding of this valuable sampling technique to derive target-site drug exposure.

Tigecycline, a tetracycline derivative, shows atypical plasma protein binding behavior. The unbound fraction decreases with increasing concentration at therapeutic concentrations. Moreover, uncertainty exists about the magnitude of tigecyline's protein binding in man. Unbound fractions between 2.5% and 35% have been reported in plasma from healthy volunteers, and between 25% and 100% in patients, respectively. In the present study, the protein binding of tigecycline has been investigated by ultrafiltration using different experimental conditions. Whereas temperature had only a marginal influence, the unbound fraction at 0.3/3.0 mg/L was low at pH 8.2 (9.4%/1.9%) or in unbuffered pooled plasma (6.3%/1.2%), compared with plasma buffered with HEPES to pH 7.4 (65.9%/39.7%). In experiments with phosphate buffer and EDTA, the concentration dependency was markedly attenuated or abolished, which is compatible with a cooperative binding mechanism involving divalent cations such as calcium. The unbound fraction in clinical plasma samples from patients treated with tigecycline was determined to 66.3 ± 13.7% at concentrations0.3 mg/L compared with 41.3 ± 16.0% at1 to5 mg/L. To summarize, tigecycline appears to be only moderately bound to plasma proteins as determined by ultrafiltration, when a physiological pH is maintained.

Background Tigecycline is a vital antibiotic treatment option for infections caused by multiresistant bacteria in the intensive care unit (ICU). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in the ICU requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but pharmacokinetic data for tigecycline in patients receiving CRRT are lacking. Methods Eleven patients mainly with intra-abdominal infections receiving either continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD, n = 8) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF, n = 3) were enrolled, and plasma as well as effluent samples were collected according to a rich sampling schedule. Total and free tigecycline was determined by ultrafiltration and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV. Population pharmacokinetic modeling using NONMEM® 7.4 was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters as well as the clearance of CVVHD and CVVHDF. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses were performed to explore the potential need for dose adjustments of tigecycline in CRRT. Results A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was suitable to simultaneously describe the plasma PK and effluent measurements of tigecycline. Tigecycline dialysability was high, as indicated by the high mean saturation coefficients of 0.79 and 0.90 for CVVHD and CVVHDF, respectively, and in range of the concentration-dependent unbound fraction of tigecycline (45–94%). However, the contribution of CRRT to tigecycline clearance (CL) was only moderate (CLCVVHD: 1.69 L/h, CLCVVHDF: 2.71 L/h) in comparison with CLbody (physiological part of the total clearance) of 18.3 L/h. Bilirubin was identified as a covariate on CLbody in our collective, reducing the observed interindividual variability on CLbody from 58.6% to 43.6%. The probability of target attainment under CRRT for abdominal infections was ≥ 0.88 for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ≤ 0.5 mg/L and similar to patients without AKI. Conclusions Despite high dialysability, dialysis clearance displayed only a minor contribution to tigecycline elimination, being in the range of renal elimination in patients without AKI. No dose adjustment of tigecycline seems necessary in CRRT. Trial registration EudraCT, 2012–005617-39. Registered on 7 August 2013.

Aims The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound ceftriaxone in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and its protein binding characteristics.

To determine unbound ertapenem concentrations in plasma and to describe the pharmacokinetics of unbound ertapenem in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.For assessing the influence of experimental conditions and for development of the ultrafiltration protocol, plasma from healthy volunteers was used. Concentrations of total and unbound ertapenem were determined by HPLC in 29 plasma samples from six ICU patients treated with 1 g of ertapenem once daily. The concentration-time courses were described by a one-compartment model. Ertapenem binding to albumin was assessed by Michaelis-Menten kinetics in solutions of human serum albumin, in plasma from healthy volunteers and in plasma from ICU patients.The unbound fraction (fu) of ertapenem was highly susceptible to pH and temperature during ultrafiltration and was ∼20% in plasma from healthy volunteers at clinically relevant concentrations. In ICU patients, fu was substantially higher (range 30.9%-53.6%). The unbound concentrations of ertapenem exceeded 2 mg/L for 72% (median; range 39%-100%) of the 24 h dosing interval and 0.25 mg/L for 100% (range 79%-100%). The number of binding sites per albumin molecule was 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.38) in plasma from healthy volunteers and 0.404 (95% CI 0.158-0.650) in samples from ICU patients.Determination of unbound ertapenem by ultrafiltration is susceptible to experimental conditions. When determined at physiological pH and temperature, fu of ertapenem is 2- to 4-fold higher than previously reported and even higher in ICU patients. Binding studies indicate that hypoalbuminaemia alone does not explain these differences. This issue should be further investigated for its clinical relevance.

Ultrafiltration is a rapid and convenient method to determine the free concentrations of drugs. In the present work, we aimed to develop an ultrafiltration method which is appropriate for routine determination of the free fraction of vancomycin and highly protein bound beta-lactams such as ertapenem, ceftriaxone and cefazolin in plasma from intensive care unit patients. Different filter types and experimental conditions (molecular weight cut-off, centrifugal force and time, pH, temperature) were evaluated and found to have influence on the result. In the final protocol, serum or plasma was buffered to pH 7.4-7.5, ultrafiltered at 1000×g at 37°C for 20min using Nanosep Omega 10K filters and subsequently analysed for the antibiotics by RP-HPLC with UV detection. The data from our investigation suggest to aim physiological conditions, i.e. 37°C and pH 7.4, and low to moderate relative centrifugal forces in order to get reliable results. With regard to the chromatographic separation, modulation of the pH in the range of 2.5-7.0 allows to determine several beta-lactams isocratically and/or to avoid interferences by co-administered drugs.

Objectives To assess the pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of fosfomycin in obese and non-obese surgical patients. Methods Fifteen obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and 15 non-obese patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery received an intravenous single short infusion of 8 g of fosfomycin. Fosfomycin concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS in plasma and microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue up to 8 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) by non-compartmental methods. Results Thirteen obese patients (BMI 38–50 kg/m2) and 14 non-obese patients (BMI 0–29 kg/m2) were evaluable. The pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in obese versus non-obese patients were characterized by lower peak plasma concentrations (468 ± 139 versus 594 ± 149 mg/L, P = 0.040) and higher V (24.4 ± 6.4 versus 19.0 ± 3.1 L, P = 0.010). The differences in AUC∞ were not significant (1275 ± 477 versus 1515 ± 352 mg·h/L, P = 0.16). The peak concentrations in subcutaneous tissue were reached rapidly and declined in parallel with the plasma concentrations. The drug exposure in tissue was nearly halved in obese compared with non-obese patients (AUC∞ 1052 ± 394 versus 1929 ± 725 mg·h/L, P = 0.0010). The tissue/plasma ratio (AUCISF/AUCplasma) was 0.86 ± 0.32 versus 1.27 ± 0.34 (P = 0.0047). Conclusions Whereas the pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in plasma of surgical patients were only marginally different between obese and non-obese patients, the drug exposure in subcutaneous tissue was significantly lower in the obese patients.

Background:Standard doses of linezolid may not be suitable for all patient groups. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients in particular may be at risk of inadequate concentrations. This study investigated variability of drug exposure and its potential sources in this population.Methods:Plasma concentrations of linezolid were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in a convenience sample of 20 ICU patients treated with intravenous linezolid 600 mg twice daily. Ultrafiltration applying physiological conditions (pH 7.4/37 degrees C) was used to determine the unbound fraction. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated by population PK modeling. As measures of exposure to linezolid, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (C-min) were calculated and compared with published therapeutic ranges (AUC 200-400 mg*h/L, C-min 2-10 mg/L). Coadministered inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 and/or P-glycoprotein were noted.Results:Data from 18 patients were included into the PK evaluation. Drug exposure was highly variable (median, range: AUC 185, 48-618 mg*h/L, calculated C-min 2.92, 0.0062-18.9 mg/L), and only a minority of patients had values within the target ranges (6 and 7, respectively). AUC and C-min were linearly correlated (R = 0.98), and classification of patients (underexposed/within therapeutic range/overexposed) according to AUC or C-min was concordant in 15 cases. Coadministration of inhibitors was associated with a trend to higher drug exposure, whereas 3 patients treated with levothyroxine showed exceedingly low drug exposure (AUC approximate to 60 mg*h/L, C-min

The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound ceftriaxone in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and its protein binding characteristics.Twenty patients (m/f 15/5, age 25-86 years, body weight 60-121 kg, APACHE II 7-40, estimated glomerular filtration rate 19-157 ml min(-1) , albumin 11.7-30.1 g l(-1) , total bilirubin0.1-36.1 mg dl(-1) ) treated with intravenous ceftriaxone were recruited from two ICUs. Timed plasma samples were obtained using an opportunistic study protocol. Ceftriaxone concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography; unbound concentrations were determined after ultrafiltration using a new method which maintains physiological pH and temperature. The pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartment model, the protein-binding characteristics by Michaelis-Menten kinetics.For total drug, the volume of distribution was 20.2 l (median; interquartile range 15.6-24.5 l), the half-life 14.5 h (10.0-25.5 h) and the clearance 0.96 l h(-1) (0.55-1.28 l h(-1) ). The clearance of unbound drug was 1.91 l h(-1) (1.46-6.20 l h(-1) ) and linearly correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (slope 0.85, y-intercept 0.24 l h(-1) , r(2) = 0.70). The unbound fraction was higher in ICU patients (33.0%; 20.2-44.5%) than reported in healthy volunteers, particularly when renal impairment or severe hyperbilirubinaemia was present. In all patients, unbound concentrations during treatment with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily remained above the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint (≤1 mg l(-1) ) throughout the whole dosing interval.Protein binding of ceftriaxone is reduced and variable in ICU patients due to hypoalbuminaemia, but also to altered binding characteristics. Despite these changes, the pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftriaxone is governed by renal function. For patients with normal or reduced renal function, standard doses are sufficient.