Search

Informal financial support is a vital yet under-examined source of welfare for people on low incomes. This thesis explores why and how people draw on networks of family, friends and neighbours for financial support to cover their basic living costs and considers the significant practical and emotional implications the practice has for individuals, their relationships and wider support networks. It takes as its starting point Robert Pinker’s (1971, 1979) view of social policy as a discipline that should take into account how ordinary people go about enhancing their own welfare and the welfare of their family members and friends in their everyday lives. The findings are based on unstructured interviews with fifty working-age social housing tenants living in the South West of England centred around a support network mapping exercise. The research identifies informal financial support as a distinctive form of support among the broad range of informal help and care people engage in on a daily basis. It highlights the significant work involved in providing and navigating informal financial support within a context of poverty, as well as the often challenging clash participants experienced between societal norms of independence and support, and the reality of their interdependent lives. For many participants, informal financial support was “the ultimate safety net”, but the research finds that the practice exposed people and their networks to multiple negative impacts and associated risks, including relationship breakdown, isolation and financial insecurity. The study concludes by arguing for a social policy based on an ethic of care that recognises and supports people's interdependence across households, while also working to prevent and mitigate the negative effects of informal financial support.

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pdp-10.1177_10935266211041086 for Acquired Esophageal Strictures in Children: Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses by Margaret H. Collins, Eileen S. Alexander, Lisa J. Martin, Tommie M. Grotjan, Vincent A. Mukkada, Amy Sheil, Juan P. Abonia, Philip E. Putnam and Marc E. Rothenberg in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-5-pdp-10.1177_10935266211041086 for Acquired Esophageal Strictures in Children: Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses by Margaret H. Collins, Eileen S. Alexander, Lisa J. Martin, Tommie M. Grotjan, Vincent A. Mukkada, Amy Sheil, Juan P. Abonia, Philip E. Putnam and Marc E. Rothenberg in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-4-pdp-10.1177_10935266211041086 for Acquired Esophageal Strictures in Children: Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses by Margaret H. Collins, Eileen S. Alexander, Lisa J. Martin, Tommie M. Grotjan, Vincent A. Mukkada, Amy Sheil, Juan P. Abonia, Philip E. Putnam and Marc E. Rothenberg in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-pdp-10.1177_10935266211041086 for Acquired Esophageal Strictures in Children: Morphometric and Immunohistochemical Analyses by Margaret H. Collins, Eileen S. Alexander, Lisa J. Martin, Tommie M. Grotjan, Vincent A. Mukkada, Amy Sheil, Juan P. Abonia, Philip E. Putnam and Marc E. Rothenberg in Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

This report presents key findings from a 6-month ethnographic study on the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on disadvantaged households and communities across the UK conducted by anthropologists from the London School of Economics, and associates. This research involved in-depth interviews and multiple surveys with people across communities in the UK, with particular focus on a number of case studies of intersecting disadvantage. Crucially, our research has found that Government policy can improve adherence to restrictions and reduce the negative impacts of the pandemic on disadvantaged communities by placing central importance on communities, social networks and households to the economy and social life. This would be the most effective way to increase public trust and adherence to Covid-19 measures, because it would recognise the suffering that communities have experienced and would build policy on the basis of what is most important to people - the thriving of their families and communities.