1. Comparison of High-Fidelity Computational Tools for Wing Design of a Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft
- Author
-
Karen A. Deere, Joseph M. Derlaga, Alex M. Stoll, Jeffrey K. Viken, Sally A. Viken, and Melissa B. Carter
- Subjects
020301 aerospace & aeronautics ,Leading edge ,Wing ,business.product_category ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Testbed ,ComputerApplications_COMPUTERSINOTHERSYSTEMS ,02 engineering and technology ,Propulsion ,Computational fluid dynamics ,01 natural sciences ,010305 fluids & plasmas ,Airplane ,0203 mechanical engineering ,Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion ,0103 physical sciences ,Systems design ,Aerospace engineering ,business ,ComputingMethodologies_COMPUTERGRAPHICS - Abstract
A variety of tools, from fundamental to high order, have been used to better understand applications of distributed electric propulsion to aid the wing and propulsion system design of the Leading Edge Asynchronous Propulsion Technology (LEAPTech) project and the X-57 Maxwell airplane. Three high-fidelity, Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics codes used during the project with results presented here are FUN3D, STAR-CCM+, and OVERFLOW. These codes employ various turbulence models to predict fully turbulent and transitional flow. Results from these codes are compared for two distributed electric propulsion configurations: the wing tested at NASA Armstrong on the Hybrid-Electric Integrated Systems Testbed truck, and the wing designed for the X-57 Maxwell airplane. Results from these computational tools for the high-lift wing tested on the Hybrid-Electric Integrated Systems Testbed truck and the X-57 high-lift wing presented compare reasonably well. The goal of the X-57 wing and distributed electric propulsion system design achieving or exceeding the required 𝐶 (sub L) = 3.95 for stall speed was confirmed with all of the computational codes.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF