Search

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2-100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3-4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Polycythemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased red blood cell mass, risk of thromboembolic events, and of transformation into secondary myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. The goal of treatment is to reduce the risk of fatal cardiovascular events reducing the hematocrit level with phlebotomies and low-dose aspirin. In high-risk patients (age60 years or previous thromboembolic events) cytoreductive therapy is indicated. In this setting, resistance and/or intolerance is common.Authors searched Medline, Embase, archives from the EHA and the ASH annual congresses from 2014 onward about ruxolitinib treatment in PV patients. Two trials (RESPONSE and RESPONSE2) have documented the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib. The drug is able to persistently control the hematocrit level and symptoms (due to increased cytokine levels, increased viscosity, and increased splenomegaly), to reduce WBC counts and the rate of thromboembolic events, to increase the quality of life.Although ruxolitinib has entered into the clinical practice, the real-life incidence of resistant/intolerant patients, the long-term safety, and the activity on thromboembolic events (associated or not to a reduction of the molecular burden) remains to be conclusively determined. More information extrapolated by registries are required to shed light on the missing information.

We report the long-term outcome of 139 patients treated with imatinib in late chronic phase after IFN failure. Median follow-up was 16.6 years and the estimated 18-year OS was 64.8%. 18-year EFS and PFS were 69% and 64.4%, respectively. Fifty (36%) patients stopped imatinib, 72% received a second line. b2a2 transcript was associated with a significantly inferior 18-year OS (

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target BCR-ABL1 kinase activity, have significantly prolonged the overall survival of patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and changed drastically the outcome. Evidences from several studies suggest that in patients who have achieved a sustained, stable and deep molecular response, TKI treatment can be safely discontinued with a close subsequent monitoring. Thus, a stable deep molecular response (DMR) has become a feasible treatment goal in CML. Areas covered: In this review, the main findings extrapolated from sponsored and real-life evidences regarding TKI discontinuation were discussed, through a broad research on Medline, Embase and archives from EHA and ASH congresses (including words such as discontinuation, treatment-free remission, TFR, etc). Moreover, suggestions emerged from international guidelines about treatment-free remission (TFR) are presented. Expert opinion: With the growing availability of clinical trials and real-life data on TFR, in recent years the possibility of offering to CML patients a safe, informed and shorter path to TFR, through the achievement of a stable deep molecular response (DMR), has become an increasing option. However, many controversial aspects remain regarding treatment choices and timings, predictive factors, patient communication and optimal strategies aimed at achieving a successful TFR.

In the last decades, the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic landscape has changed dramatically with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with 10-year survival rates improving to up to 80%. Long-lasting TKI treatment, in particular with second-generation TKIs, has enabled clinicians to manage the onset of several side effects and other co-morbidities, such as atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (VTE). We retrospectively evaluated nine CML patients treated with TKIs between 2017 and 2020 who experienced atrial fibrillation or VTE and received concomitant administration of TKIs and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) outside clinical trials, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination. Median age was 66 years at CML diagnosis (range 52–73 years) and 69 years at the time of starting DOACs. A female predominance was observed. The median follow-up of concomitant DOAC and TKI administration was 8.5 months; edoxaban was administered in six patients and apixaban in two patients, and one patient received rivaroxaban. Regarding CML treatment, four patients received imatinib, two patients bosutinib, and three nilotinib. In eight patients DOACs were started for atrial fibrillation and in one patient for VTE. In none of the patients treated with the combination were additional symptomatic thrombotic adverse events or major bleedings reported. In this small case series, the use of DOACs in CML patients seemed feasible. Additional data on long-term outcomes including a larger cohort of CML patients treated with DOACs are, however, needed.

Introduction: Patients with cancer may be more susceptible to and have higher morbidity and mortality rates from COVID-19 than the general population, while epidemiologic data specifically addressed to hematologic patients are limited. To investigate whether patients with hematologic diseases undergoing therapy are at increased risk for acquiring SARS CoV-2 infection compared to the general population, a retrospective study was carried out at a referral hematologic center in Rome, Italy, during the period of the greatest epidemic spread (March 8 to May 14, 2020). Methods: All adult and pediatric patients with a diagnosis of a neoplastic or a nonneoplastic hematologic disease who underwent treatment (chemotherapy or immunosuppressive or supportive therapy) during the study period or in the previous 6 months were considered. The prevalence of COVID-19 in the overall outpatient and inpatient population undergoing hematologic treatment compared to that of the general population was analyzed. The measures taken to manage patients during the epidemic period are described. Results: Overall, 2,513 patients with hematological diseases were considered. Out of 243 (9.7%) patients who were screened for SARS CoV-2, three of 119 (2.5%) outpatients with fever or respiratory symptoms and none of 124 asymptomatic patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. Three further patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 and managed in other hospitals in Rome. As of May 14, 2020, the prevalence of COVID-19 in our hematologic population accounted for 0.24% (95% CI 0.23–0.25; 6 of 2,513 patients: 1 case in every 419 patients) as compared to 0.12% (7,280 of 5,879,082 residents; 1 case in every 807 residents) in the general population (p = 0.14). Three of 6 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 required critical care and 2 died while still positive for SARS CoV-2. Out of 225 healthcare providers on duty at our Institution during the study period, 2 (0.9%) symptomatic cases were diagnosed with COVID-19. Conclusion: In our experience, the prevalence of COVID-19 in hematologic patients, mainly affected by malignancies, was not significantly higher compared to that of the general population. Definition of adapted strategies for healthcare services, while continuing to administer the standard hematologic treatments, represents the crucial challenge for the management of hematologic diseases in the COVID-19 era.

Predictive factors of response to hypomethylating agents (HMA) in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients remain unclear in the real-life setting and no direct comparison between azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) has been carried out. We retrospectively evaluated 110 AML patients treated with HMA (78 AZA, 32 DEC) as first-line therapy outside of clinical trials. Median age was 75 years (range 58-87). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1-10), without significant differences among the subgroups: AZA 8.8 months vs DEC 6.3 months (p = 0.291). HMA treatment yielded an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% (AZA 37% vs DEC 47%, p = 0.237). A stable disease (SD) after 4 HMA cycles was not associated with a worse survival outcome compared with an early optimal response. Factors independently associated with a better OS were transfusion independence during treatment (p = 0.049), achievement of an optimal response to treatment (p < 0.001), and a baseline hemoglobin level ≥ 9.25 (p = 0.018). A bone marrow (BM) blast count ≥ 30% (p < 0.001) and a therapy-related AML (p = 0.008) remain poor survival predictors. Of the available biologic features, an adverse risk category according to the ELN classification was significantly associated with a shorter survival over the intermediate risk category (p = 0.034). Disease progression remains the primary cause of death. Infectious complications were more severe (p = 0.036) and occurred earlier (p = 0.006) in the DEC group compared with that of the AZA group. In conclusion, clinical prognostic factors associated to response and survival have been identified without significant associations concerning overall outcomes between the two HMAs.

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1-16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4-22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4-4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying Richter Syndrome (RS) is well established, while its impact on the survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been less explored. The clinical characteristics and PET/CT data of 40 patients with a biopsy-proven CLL who required frontline chemoimmunotherapy, FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) in 20 patients, BR (bendamustine, rituximab) in 20, were retrospectively analyzed. Standardized uptake volume (SUVmax) values &ge, 5 were observed more frequently in patients with deletion 11q (p = 0.006) and biopsies characterized by a rate of Ki67 positive cells &ge, 30% (p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of large and confluent PCs emerged as the only factor with a negative impact on progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Deletion 11q also revealed a significant and independent effect on PFS. SUVmax values &ge, 5 showed no statistical impact on PFS while in multivariate analysis, they revealed a significant adverse impact on OS (median survival probability not reached vs. 56 months, p = 0.002). Moreover, patients with higher SUVmax values more frequently developed Richter Syndrome (p = 0.015). Our results show that higher SUVmax values identify CLL patients with a pronounced rate of proliferating cells in the lymph-node compartment, inferior survival, and an increased risk of developing RS.

Introduction Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) has become highly curable after introduction of Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). However, several side-effects have been reported with the prolonged use of TKIs: in particular, severe cardiovascular and pulmonary toxicities were observed with 2 nd generation TKIs (2G-TKIs), nilotinib and dasatinib. Imatinib is generally considered safer, even if some concerns were recently raised on its renal toxicity and occurrence of late anemia. Aims To evaluate the impact of imatinib compared to 2G-TKIs on the hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the long-lasting frontline treatment of CML patients. Methods From 1/2002 to 12/2015, 365 CML patients were diagnosed and treated frontline with TKIs in 2 different Centres in Italy: of them, 123 permanently discontinued the treatment before the 5 th year from the start due to intolerance (31 cases, 25.2%), primary resistance (41, 33.3%), secondary resistance (16, 13.0%), blastic evolution (4, 3.2%), unrelated death (12, 9.8%) or were lost to follow-up (19, 15.5%). At 5 years, the remaining 242 patients were still receiving frontline TKI treatment and were considered for the present analysis. Hb levels were recorded at baseline and thereafter every 12 months up to the 5 th year of treatment. Results As to frontline treatment, 186 patients (76.8%) received imatinib and 56 (23.2%) 2G-TKIs (nilotinib in 44 cases and dasatinib in 12, respectively). The main clinical features at diagnosis of the entire cohort and according to frontline treatment are reported in the table: median Hb value at baseline was significantly lower in patients treated with 2G-TKIs. Median Hb values at different time-points according to frontline treatment are reported in the Figure. In patients treated with imatinib, median Hb levels at 12 th (12.5 g/dl, IQR 11.6-13.5) and 60 th month (12.4 g/dl, IQR 11.4-13.3) were stable compared to baseline (12.8 g/dl, IQR 11.3-13.8) (p=0.248 and p=0.075, respectively). On the contrary, median Hb levels at 12 th (13.4 g/dl, IQR 12.2-14.3) and 60 th month (13.6 g/dl, IQR 12.0-14.6) showed a significant increase compared to baseline (11.8 g/dl, IQR 10.6-13.7) in patients treated with 2G-TKIs (p Conclusions Present data highlight that long-lasting treatment with imatinib can have a negative late effect on erythropoiesis, with incomplete recovery of hemoglobin levels and occurrence of late anemia in about 15% of patients at the 60 th month of therapy.This possible adverse event, which is still unrecognized and seems very rare with 2G-TKIs, could affect quality of life and should be recognized in the long-term management of CML patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Martelli: Novartis: Other: advisory board; Gilead: Other: advisory board. Breccia: Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly. Advancing age is associated with greater vulnerability, increasing treatment side effects and reduced survival with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Comorbidities burden, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) scores emerged as reliable tools in trials with patients (pts) receiving CIT. Ibrutinib changed CLL treatment paradigm. Nevertheless, adverse events leading to dose reductions and discontinuations are frequent in everyday practice. Finally, it is still unclear whether age, ECOG and comorbidities retain a predictive value with ibrutinib and if number and types of concomitant medications may interfere with treatment outcome. Methods This multicenter retrospective analysis evaluated 712 pts in 15 Italian centers treated with ibrutinib from March 2014 to May 2020. We analyzed the impact of age (6), major CIRS comorbidity (at least one organ with a CIRS score ≥3, CIRS3+), ECOG (0-1 vs >1) and CCI ( Survival functions for the time-to-event variables were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and related strata compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were also performed using the Cox regression. Results Table 1 shows pts characteristics. Median follow-up was 26.6 months (range 3 - 75.8); median months on ibrutinib, 21.2 (range 3 - 75.4). Overall, 440 (61.8%) pts are continuing treatment. A total of 272 pts (38.2%) permanently discontinued ibrutinib: 128 (18%) due to toxicity; 132 (18.5%) due to progressive disease/Richter Transformation; 13 (1.8%) for other reasons. Of 712 pts, 325 (45.6%) discontinued treatment for ≥7 days with a median of 15 days/pts interruption. At least one dose reduction occurred in 219 pts (30.8%) and in 123 (17.3%) ibrutinib was permanently administered at a lower dosage. Toxicity was the main reason for PDR (175 pts). Concomitant medications were recorded in 624 (87.6%) pts, 374 of whom took ≥4 drugs in addition to ibrutinib. In 75 cases ibrutinib was concomitant with CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers. At univariate analysis age ≥ 65y, CIRS>6, CIRS3+, ECOG >1 and CCI ≥2, showed to be significant for tox-DTD. All parameters except age ≥ 65y had an impact on PDR. ECOG >1 was the only parameter affecting PFS, EFS and OS (p6 negatively influenced PFS and EFS but not OS. In pts stratification according to age, only in the elderly CIRS >6 was significant for tox-DTD (p 0.009), PDR (p1 and CIRS>6 were the only fitness-related parameters affecting both PFS and EFS; the influence of ECOG was significant for tox-DTD and OS also (Table 2). CCI ≥2 had an impact on PDR only. Baseline neutropenia also influenced pts tox-DTD and all survival outcomes. Treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers was independently associated with higher PDR. Pts outcome in terms of EFS, PFS and OS was also significantly dependent on number of previous lines of treatment (0 vs 1-2 vs ≥3) and presence of del17p/TP53 mutation (not shown in table 2). Ibrutinib PDR did not affect PFS and OS, while OS was significantly reduced in pts definitively discontinuing treatment due to toxicity (p Conclusions To our knowledge this is the largest series analyzing the role of age, comorbidities and concomitant medications in pts treated with ibrutinib. In univariate analysis the incidence of tox-DTD and PDR was significantly higher in pts with CIRS3+ and in elderly pts with CIRS>6. ECOG>1 significantly affected pts outcome. Furthermore, CIRS>6 was associated with shorter EFS and PFS in elderly. In the Cox regression hazards model ECOG and CIRS>6 were the only fitness-related factors influencing outcome. Baseline neutropenia also emerged as a parameter significantly affecting both treatment management and survival outcomes. Disclosures Tedeschi: Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sunesis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coscia:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ciolli:Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Reda:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laurenti:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Varettoni:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Murru:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sportoletti:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Vitale:Janssen: Honoraria. Di Raimondo:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen, Takeda, Novartis: Honoraria; GILEAD, Incyte: Research Funding. Montillo:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria.

Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients has become a reality. Treatment-free remission (TFR) defines the rate of success aft...

The CLL-IPI score, which combines genetic, biochemical, and clinical parameters, represents a simple worldwide model able to refine risk stratification for CLL patients. This score, developed in the era of chemo-immunotherapy, has not been gauged extensively in R/R-CLL patients treated with novel targeted agents, such as BCR and BCL2 inhibitors. Soumerai et al (Lancet Hematol 2019) assembled a novel risk model for OS in the setting of R/R-CLL receiving targeted therapies in clinical trials. This model, consisting of four accessible markers (β2M, LDH, Hb, and time from initiation of last therapy; BALL score), is able to cluster 3 groups of CLL patients with significantly different OS. This multicenter, observational retrospective study aimed to validate the proposed Soumerai (BALL) and/or CLL-IPI scores for R/R-CLL real-world patients treated with idelalisib and rituximab (IDELA-R). The primary objectives were to determine whether: i) the CLL-IPI retains its prognostic power also in R/R patients treated with IDELA-R; ii) the BALL score is of prognostic value for IDELA-treated R/R-CLL patients, and iii) the BALL score is predictive of PFS. This study, sponsored by Gilead (ISR#IN-IT-312-5339), included CLL patients collected from 12 Italian centers, who received IDELA-R (idelalisib 150 mg b.i.d. and a total of 8 rituximab infusions intravenously) outside clinical trials as salvage therapy with available data for the calculation of the CLL-IPI and BALL scores at the time of treatment start. OS was estimated for all subgroups of both scores. Additionally, risk-specific PFS was assessed. Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox regression analyses were performed. The prognostic accuracy of the predictive model was assessed by Harrell's C-index. Overall, 120 CLL patients were included in this analysis. The majority of patients were Binet stage B and C (94.2%). The median age was 75 years and 83 cases (69.2%) were male. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range 1-9) Baseline patient features are listed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 1.6 years (1 month to 5.8 years), 33 patients had died and 39 experienced an event (death or progression). CLL-IPI scoring (115/120 evaluable cases) indicated that 6 patients (5.2%) were classified as low-risk, 24 (20.9%) as intermediate-risk, 58 (50.4%) as high-risk, and 27 (23.5%) as very high-risk. Stratification of patients according to the CLL-IPI score did not allow prediction of significant differences in OS. Thus, low-risk patients had a 2-year OS probability of 75% (HR=1), with an intermediate-risk of 68% (HR=2.9, 95%CI 0.37-23.3, P=0.3), high-risk of 83% (HR=1.58, 95%CI 0.2-12.5, P=0.66), and very high-risk of 63% (HR=5.9, 95%CI 0.78-45.2, P=0.86). Next, we tested a modified CLL-IPI by assigning a more balanced score to the original CLL-IPI variables (Soumerai et al, Leukemia Lymphoma 2019), partially overlapping previous results. Specifically, modified CLL-IPI high-risk group showed a significantly different OS as compared with intermediate- and low-risk groups. However, differently from the original report no difference was observed between low- and intermediate-risk). According to the BALL score (120/120 evaluable cases), 33 patients (27.5%) were classified as low-risk, 68 (56.7%) as intermediate-risk, and 19 (15.8%) as high-risk. Stratification of patients according to the BALL score predicted significant differences in terms of OS. Thus, low-risk patients had a 2-year OS probability of 92% (HR=1), intermediate-risk of 76% (HR=5.47, 95%CI 1.3-23.7, P=0.023), and high-risk of 54% (HR=15.1, 95%CI 3.4-67, P Disclosures Mauro: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coscia:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Varettoni:ABBVIE: Other: travel expenses; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: travel expenses. Rossi:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Janseen: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Scientific advisory board. Gaidano:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sunesys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Many epidemiological, biological and therapeutic studies have extensively investigated the etiological link between HCV infection and B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Large experiences in the literature demonstrated HCV-related indolent NHL regression after antiviral therapy. While the response to interferon-ribavirin-based antiviral therapy is well documented, evidence of the efficacy of interferon-free Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) in this subset of lymphoma is also currently increasing. Splenic and Nodal Marginal zone Lymphoma (MZL) are frequently associated with HCV chronic infection. In this article we report two cases of HCV-related MZL with an unusual presentation, subcutaneous “lipoma-like” nodules, treated with DAAs. Both patients, a 59-years-old woman and a 72-years-old man, were affected by HCV chronic infection since several years and were referred to our Institute for a diagnosis of MZL with subcutaneous presentation. Given the possible etiological link with HCV infection, both patients were treated with DAAS. A Sustained virological response (SVR) was reached after few weeks of therapy and at the end of treatment a clinically and radiologically documented reduction of MZL localizations, persisting to date, were obtained in both patients. The two clinical cases presented in this article confirm the efficacy of DAA’s as first-line treatment in HCV related NHL, also in this rare entity of MZL with subcutaneous presentation.