Search

With increasing immigration to Europe, migrants and ethnic minorities (MEMs) are progressively represented on transplant waiting lists. However, they remain underrepresented among the pools of both deceased and living donors (LD). Further, studies report inferior knowledge and/or understanding of organ donation and transplantation among these populations, with the potential for detrimental impacts on accessibility, quality and outcomes of care. The ethnic and cultural diversity characterising European societies poses additional challenges to the complexity inherent to communication in transplant settings. This study addresses the ethical, theoretical and practical implications of targeting/tailoring interventions for MEM populations in the transplant continuum. It puts forward a call for action on the emergent issue of how institutional actors and healthcare professionals should interact more effectively with MEM publics, potential donors and/or their families and MEM transplant candidates/recipients/LDs.

Background Multiple barriers diminish access to kidney transplantation (KT) in immigrant compared to non-immigrant populations. It is unknown whether immigration status reduces the likelihood of KT after wait-listing despite universal healthcare coverage with uniform access to transplantation. Methods We retrospectively collected data of all adult waiting list (WL) registrants in Italy (2010–20) followed for 5 years until death, KT in a foreign center, deceased-donor kidney transplant (DDKT), living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) or permanent withdrawal from the WL. We calculated adjusted relative probability of DDKT, LDKT and permanent WL withdrawal in different immigrant categories using competing-risks multiple regression models. Results Patients were European Union (EU)-born (n = 21 624), Eastern European-born (n = 606) and non-European-born (n = 1944). After controlling for age, sex, blood type, dialysis vintage, case-mix and sensitization status, non-European-born patients had lower LDKT rates compared to other immigrant categories: LDKT adjusted relative probability of non-European-born vs. Eastern European-born 0.51 (95% CI: 0.33–0.79; P = 0.002); of non-European-born vs. EU-Born: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47–0.82; P = 0.001). Immigration status did not affect the rate of DDKT or permanent WL withdrawal. Conclusions Among EU WL registrants, non-European immigration background is associated with reduced likelihood of LDKT but similar likelihood of DDKT and permanent WL withdrawal. Wherever not available, new national policies should enable coverage of travel and medical fees for living-donor surgery and follow-up for non-resident donors to improve uptake of LDKT in immigrant patients, and provide KT education that is culturally competent, individually tailored and easily understandable for patients and their potential living donors.

Living donation challenges the ethical principle of non-maleficence in that it exposes healthy persons to risks for the benefit of someone else. This makes safety, informed consent (IC) and education a priority. Living kidney donation has multiple benefits for the potential donor, but there are also several known short- and long-term risks. Although complete standardization of IC is likely to be unattainable, studies have emphasized the need for a standardized IC process to enable equitable educational and decision-making prospects for the prevention of inequities across transplant centers. Based on the Three-Talk Model of shared decision-making by Elwyn et al., we propose a model, named 3-Step (S) Model, where each step coincides with the three ideal timings of the process leading the living donor to the decision to pursue living donation: prior to the need for kidney replacement therapy (team talk); at the local nephrology unit or transplant center, with transplant clinicians and surgeons prior to evaluations start (option talk); and throughout evaluation, after having learned about the different aspects of donation, especially if there are second thoughts or doubts (decision talk). Based on the 3-S Model, to deliver conceptual and practical guidance to nephrologists and transplant clinicians, we provide recommendations for standardization of the timing, content, modalities for communicating risks and assessment of understanding prior to donation. The 3-S Model successfully allows an integration between standardization and individualization of IC, enabling a person-centered approach to potential donors. Studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-S Model in kidney transplant clinical practice.

Background: The contemporary scientific literature documents a lack of attention toward the act of consoling put into practice by health care professionals (HCPs) in hospice services. Objective: To describe the act of consoling and its meaning for hospice-employed HCPs. Design: A multicenter observational survey study was performed through a paper-based questionnaire. Subjects: The study was sent to the directors of 10 hospices in Northern Italy and distributed to 232 HCPs. Results: A total of 218 HCPs responded (94%). The results showed that most HCPs consider the practice of consoling to be essential to their profession, but they also underscored the extreme complexity of the process. Conclusion: The act of consoling is not simply a professional duty defined in contractual clauses. Rather, it is a set of specific communicative practices and skills required of HCPs.

The debate on the opportunity to use organs from donors testing positive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in recipients with naïve resolved or active COVID-19 is ongoing. We aim to present the ethical analyses underlying the decision to perform liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients with resolved or active COVID-19 in Italy. We used Jonsen, Siegler, and Winslade's Four-Boxes casuistic method, addressing the four topics considered as constitutive of the essential structure of single clinical cases for their ethical analysis (medical indications, patient preferences, quality of life, and contextual features) to enable decision-making on a case-by-case basis. Based on these topics, we elucidate the meaning and balance among the principles of biomedical ethics. Clinical ethics judgment based on the relation between the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 along with its potentially negative effects and the expected benefits of transplant lead to consider LT as clinically appropriate. Shared decision-making allows the integration of clinical options with the patient's subjective preferences and considerations, enabling a valid informed consent specifically tailored to the patients' individual circumstances. The inclusion of carefully selected SARS-CoV-2 positive donors represents an opportunity to offer lifesaving LT to patients who might otherwise have limited opportunities to receive one. COVID-19 positive donor livers are fairly allocated among equals, and respect for fundamental rights of the individual and the broader community in a context of healthcare rationing is guaranteed.The ethical analysis of the decision to perform LT in selected patients shows that the decision is ethically justifiable.

Background The risk of disease transmission from nonstandard risk donors (NSRDs) is low, and outcomes are similar or better relative to transplants performed with standard criteria donors. However, NSRDs have posed new ethical challenges to the informed consent (IC) process. Based on the shared decision-making model, coinciding with the 3 main timings of the IC process ([1] pretransplant assessments and waiting list registration, [2] time on the waiting list, and [3] time of the organ offer), we put forward a model (3-T Model) to summarize the knowledge on IC for NSRDs and to deliver conceptual and practical support to transplant providers on this emergent issue. Methods We searched PubMed and analyzed data from our area to provide evidence and ethical arguments to promote standardization of the timing of patient information, degree of patient participation, and disclosure of donor risk factors throughout the 3 stages of the time continuum leading to the potential acceptance of NSRDs. Results Each of the 3 timings carries special ethical significance and entails well-defined duties for transplant providers relative to patient involvement and information of the benefits and risks associated with NSRDs. Based on our framework, experience, and interpretation of the literature, we put forward a list of recommendations to combine standardization (ie, timing, content, and degree of patient participation) and individualization of IC. Conclusions The 3-T Model may enable the prevention of physicians' arbitrariness and the promotion of patient-centered care. Future studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-T Model in transplant clinical practice.

Introduction: To evaluate retinal microvasculature modifications by means of optical coherence tomography angiography in human subjects diagnosed with arterial hypertension and to assess potential clinical relevance for early diagnosis. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 30 subjects affected by arterial hypertension compared to a matched cohort of healthy patients was conducted. Patients were evaluated by the Outpatient Clinic for Hypertension and the Retina Center, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1—healthy subjects, Group 2—patients first diagnosed with hypertension, and Group 3—patients with treated hypertension. Optical coherence tomography angiography was performed applying different analysis protocols for macula and optic disk, using an AngioVue OCTA System on an Optovue device. Morphological data were compared to and correlated with clinical vascular parameters, to evaluate preclinical microvascular damage. Results: A significant reduction in deep vascular layer density (Group 1: 59.2% ± 1.5% standard deviation; Group 2: 59.2% ± 2.2% standard deviation; Group 3: 57.8% ± 2.6% standard deviation; p < 0.05) as well as an enlargement of the deep foveal avascular zone area (Group 1: 0.34 ± 0.09 mm2; Group 2: 0.36 ± 0.07 mm2; Group 3: 0.39 ± 0.1 mm2; p < 0.05) was measured in patients with first diagnosed hypertension and in treated patients compared to healthy subjects. We also observed a significant decrease in mean foveal choroidal thickness in affected patients compared to controls (Group 1: 319.68 ± 61.72 µm standard deviation; Group 2: 251.04 ± 63.1 µm standard deviation; Group 3: 262.65 ± 51.08 µm standard deviation; p < 0.05). Our preliminary data did not show a significant correlation with microalbuminuria levels. Discussion: Retinal vascular density showed pathological modifications between healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. These preliminary findings suggest that optical coherence tomography angiography may identify pathological markers of an early hypertensive damage and help monitor disease progression with potential therapeutic advantages.

"Informed consent (IC) in older adults (≥ 70 years of age) is often complex. This holds even truer in the setting of organ transplantation (OTx), requiring patients to be informed of the risks and benefits associated with multiple options: whether or not to pursue a transplant, to opt for a living – where appropriate – or deceased donor, to consider a variety of choices concerning the potential for poorer organ quality or increased risk of disease transmission and others. IC overlaps with shared decision-making (SDM) in the presence of high-risk procedures, with low levels of certainty, and when two or more treatment alternatives exist. Patient decision aids (PDAs) (i.e. paper-based/electronic evidence-based tools) have been developed to complement and enhance SDM in clinical practice. Studies have proven PDAs to be an effective means to improve transplant knowledge, to foster patient participation, and to diminish decisional conflict across different settings in OTx. However, research is lacking on the effectiveness and appropriateness of these tools in older adults, which are increasingly entitled to receive OTx. The objective of our work is 1) to present the challenges posed by the use of PDAs in this group of patients and 2) to identify gaps so as to inform the agenda for research on this emergent issue. Our findings suggest that future studies should aim to the development, implementation and evaluation of PDAs for the oldest, more vulnerable segments of this specific patient population. "

"The Ethics Consultant (EC), where present, is called on to offer a resolution to ethical dilemmas at different times over the course of treatment. However, it is not yet clear under which particular circumstances the intervention of the EC should be requested when chronic diseases occur following an acute event. As part of the treatment of these evolutionary chronic conditions, the pathway is often complex and may involve multiple actors (i.e. departments, hospitals, and others). The role of the EC is often limited to a single department and to an isolated event. Therefore, there is frequently no possibility to take into consideration all of the options inherent to the entire continuum of care and of their consequences for the patient. From intensive care units, rehabilitation wards, long-term hospitalization, through to palliative care, the pathway presents important ethical-clinical questions for the patient, for the healthcare team, and for family members. For these reasons, our objective is to develop a model of consultation integrating the EC along the continuum of care. By analyzing a series of cases, we developed an integrated model of consultation allowing the EC to intervene at different subsequent stages of the process. Our findings suggest that this model is an effective means to allow the EC to provide support in relation to single events but also to coherently pursue – within a collaborative setting across different departments – a specific course of treatment which is respectful of clinical indications and of patients’ and caregivers’ preferences along the whole pathway. "

Objectives: This study explored views of Moroccan migrant women on barriers and facilitators to the organized breast cancer screening program in Brussels (Belgium), and the potential of targeted printed invitations to increase this population's attendance to the program. Methods: We conducted one expert interview with the breast cancer screening program coordinator on current practices and challenges with regards to inviting Moroccan migrant women in Brussels for screening. Secondly, we held focus groups with Moroccan women aged 26-66. Sessions focused on perspectives on breast cancer screening and the existing generic program invitations. Directed content analysis of transcripts was based on the Health Belief Model. Alternative communication packages were developed based on barriers and suggestions from the focus groups. A second round of focus groups looked at the alternative communication packages and their potential to encourage Moroccan migrant women in Brussels to participate in the organized breast cancer screening program. Results: Alternative packages were appreciated by some, but a number of adjustments did not catch participants' attention. Printed communication delivered by post does not appear to be the preferred means of communication to encourage breast cancer screening for Moroccan migrant women in Brussels, nor does it seem appropriate to address the barriers to screening found in this study. Conclusions: The benefit of targeted postal invitation packages for Moroccan migrant women in Brussels seems limited for a variety of reasons. For future research, a large-scale study analyzing the topic in a cross-cultural perspective is warranted.

Dissociative experiences are common in traumatized individuals who can use dissociation as a psychological escape from emotional and physical distress associated with overwhelming traumatic events. Traumatic experiences and the cultural interpretation of trauma-related symptoms often serve to explain the wide range of dissociative phenomenology; in fact, dissociation is a complex and ubiquitous construct present in a variety of mental disorders. The Six-Dimensions Model of National Culture has been used as a tool to compare patients' different cultural background that could have accounted for the different clinical manifestations. This paper reports three clinical cases in which the focus of interest is represented by the dissociative alterations of consciousness, as a response to trauma, specifically related to migration, and their correlation with cultural environment. The study shows as Hofstede's model has been used for the first time as a tool to explain how different cultural background could shape clinical manifestations.

Background Barriers to access medical screening and care may underestimate the number of diseased subjects among immigrant populations. Aims To evaluate the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections among immigrants recruited in a disadvantaged area. Methods The study enrolled all subjects seen between 1999 and 2009 at an on-site health and family counselling centre for immigrants. During the first 6 years of the study a pro-active recruitment was performed using a mobile unit. Results Overall 2681 subjects were enrolled (median age: 31 years; 52.8% males; 82.3% from Sub-Saharan Africa; 13.9% of the women were sex workers). A total of 206 subjects (7.6%) were hepatitis B surface antigen-positive, 84 (3.6%) were anti-hepatitis C virus-positive, 129 (5%) were anti-human immunodeficiency virus-positive, 84 (3.1%) were drug users, and 436 (16.3%) were alcohol abusers. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus remained consistent throughout the study period, while the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus significantly decreased. At multivariate analysis, hepatitis B virus infection was associated with male gender, hepatitis C virus infection with drug addiction, and human immunodeficiency virus infection was associated with female gender, drug addiction, and active recruitment. Conclusions An active recruitment strategy should be considered to reach disadvantaged populations at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Paolo A. Grossi, Alessandro Nanni Costa, Deirdre Fehily, Emily A. Blumberg, Matthew J. Kuehnert, Jay A. Fishman, Michael G. Ison, Roberta Lattes, Camille N. Kotton, Daniele Lilleri, Anne Kabanova, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Giuseppi Gerna, Raymund R. Razonable, Patrizia Comoli, Marco Zecca, Sabrina Basso, Fabrizio Ginevri, Alessandra Grossi, Francesco P. Schena, Antoni Rimola, Patrizia Burra, Elenora De Martin, Kryssia Isabel Rodriguez-Castro, Stefano Fagiuoli, Luisa Pasulo, Raffaele Bruno, Pietro Andreone, Elisabetta Loggi, Fabio Arena, Gian Maria Rossolini, Gabriele Sganga, and Valerio Cozza