Search

Purpose: To determine whether statistical shape modeling can detect subtle morphologic differences in the shape of the proximal femur that correlate with clinical findings of unilateral femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods: Patients who had diagnoses of unilateral femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and who had existing computed tomography scans of their pelvises were included. Three-dimensional shape models in the form of triangle meshes were generated from the computed tomography images. Statistical shapes of cam-type and normal hips were compared to identify structural differences. Results: The study included 33 hips in 17 subjects. Of the subjects, 7 (41.1%) were male, and 10 (58.9%) were female. The subjects ranged in age from 17-60 years of age (mean 36.3 ± 11.0 years old). The statistical shape modeling found mean shapes and modes after optimizing the groupwise correspondence. Symptomatic hips demonstrated 1 mm of thickening as compared to the femoral necks of asymptomatic hips, corresponding to cam lesions. Conclusions: Symptomatic cam deformities were an average of 1 mm more prominent in the femoral neck region as compared to the asymptomatic hips when using statistical shape modeling. The present study provides a proof of the concept that statistical shape modeling can be used to examine and help define cam morphology and that subtle morphologic differences may account for developing femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Clinical Relevance: Using the methods presented in this study, it would be possible to define cam and pincer morphologies by creating statistical shape models, and this work could potentially lead to the development of a new classification system for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome lesions.

Purpose: To determine the 3-dimensional (3D) in vivo hip translation in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) using 3D computed tomography (CT) models with the hip in neutral and FABER (flexion, abduction, and the external rotation) positions and to identify patient predictors associated with the degree of hip translation. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with FAIS and cam lesions underwent CT scans in neutral and FABER positions. Demographics including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded for each patient. The cam deformity was characterized both in plain x-ray film and 3D. Translation between both positions was calculated using a validated high-precision 3D-3D registration technique. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses sought factors correlated with translation. Results: The mean age of the patients included in the analysis was 36.3 ± 9.2 years, with 51% of the study group being female. The mean 3D femoral head center translation was 0.84 ± 0.37 mm, decomposed into vectors on standard anatomical directions as 0.13 ± 0.58 mm medial, 0.10 ± 0.54 mm posterior, and 0.08 ± 0.46 mm inferior. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that total translation was associated with larger alpha angles (β = 0.014; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.024; P = .013), and greater BMI (β = 0.033; 95% CI 0.001-0.065; P = .042). Furthermore, posterior–inferior translation was associated with BMI (β = 0.032; 95% CI 0.003-0.061; P = .031), whereas medial–lateral translation is associated with the female sex (β = 0.388; 95% CI 0.124-0.634; P = .002), and smaller head radius (β = –0.068; 95% CI –0.128 to –0.007; P = .029). Conclusions: As a provocative maneuver, FABER positioning in patients with FAIS resulted in an average measurable translation of the femoral head center in the posterior, medial, and inferior direction. Factors including sex, BMI, and alpha angle predicted the degree of translation. Clinical Relevance: The current study demonstrates that there is measurable hip translation between the neutral and FABER positions in patients with symptomatic FAIS, which may cause hip microinstability. Furthermore, the study found an association between hip translation and both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. This may indicate the need for more comprehensive preoperative surgical planning, intraoperative dynamic examination of the hip, and consideration of capsular plication in certain patients.