1. Integration of mucus and its impact within in vitro setups for inhaled drugs and formulations: Identifying the limits of simple vs. complex methodologies when studying drug dissolution and permeability.
- Author
-
Radivojev S, Kargl L, Pinto JT, Swedrowska M, Malmlöf M, Meindl C, Forbes B, Gerde P, Paudel A, and Fröhlich E
- Subjects
- Administration, Inhalation, Swine, Animals, Humans, Solubility, Cell Line, Bronchodilator Agents administration & dosage, Bronchodilator Agents pharmacokinetics, Bronchodilator Agents chemistry, Lung metabolism, Drug Compounding methods, Mucus metabolism, Permeability, Budesonide pharmacokinetics, Budesonide administration & dosage, Budesonide chemistry, Formoterol Fumarate administration & dosage, Formoterol Fumarate pharmacokinetics, Albuterol administration & dosage, Albuterol pharmacokinetics, Albuterol chemistry, Drug Liberation, Tiotropium Bromide administration & dosage, Tiotropium Bromide pharmacokinetics, Tiotropium Bromide chemistry
- Abstract
Traditionally, developing inhaled drug formulations relied on trial and error, yet recent technological advancements have deepened the understanding of 'inhalation biopharmaceutics' i.e. the processes that occur to influence the rate and extent of drug exposure in the lungs. This knowledge has led to the development of new in vitro models that predict the in vivo behavior of drugs, facilitating the enhancement of existing formulation and the development of novel ones. Our prior research examined how simulated lung fluid (SLF) affects the solubility of inhaled drugs. Building on this, we aimed to explore drug dissolution and permeability in lung mucosa models containing mucus. Thus, the permeation of four active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), salbutamol sulphate (SS), tiotropium bromide (TioBr), formoterol fumarate (FF) and budesonide (BUD), was assayed in porcine mucus covered Calu-3 cell layers, cultivated at an air liquid interface (ALI) or submerged in a liquid covered (LC) culture system. Further analysis on BUD and FF involved their transport in a mucus-covered PAMPA system. Finally, their dissolution post-aerosolization from Symbicort® was compared using 'simple' Transwell and complex DissolvIt® apparatuses, alone or in presence of porcine mucus or polymer-lipid mucus simulant. The presence of porcine mucus impacted both permeability and dissolution of inhaled drugs. For instance, permeability of SS was reduced by a factor of ten in the Calu-3 ALI model while the permeability of BUD was reduced by factor of two in LC and ALI setups. The comparison of dissolution methodologies indicated that drug dissolution performance was highly dependent on the setup, observing decreased release efficiency and higher variability in Transwell system compared to DissolvIt®. Overall, results demonstrate that relatively simple methodologies can be used to discriminate between formulations in early phase drug product development. However, for more advanced stages complex methods are required. Crucially, it was clear that the impact of mucus and selection of its composition in in vitro testing of dissolution and permeability should not be neglected when developing drugs and formulations intended for inhalation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Snezana Radivojev, Lukas Kargl, Joana T. Pinto, Eleonore Fröhlich and Amrit Paudel are employees of the Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, which received funding for their work from Chiesi Farmaceutici. Maria Malmlöf and Per Gerde are employed by Inhalation Sciences AB.]., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF