Search

Purpose: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by immunochemotherapy (iCT) and surgery in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC received radiotherapy (50 Gy/25f, 5 days/week) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg on day 1/week) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on day 1/week) for 5 weeks, followed by tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1/cycle) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2/cycle) for two 21-day cycles. Patients who converted to resectable underwent surgery 2 to 4 weeks afterward. The primary endpoint was a 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled and underwent CRT (median follow-up: 21 months), of whom 24 received iCT. Twenty (66.7%) patients achieved resectability (R0: 95.2%; pathologic complete response: 65.0%; major pathologic response: 90.0%). One-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.4% and 89.6%, respectively. The R0 resection group exhibited longer PFS (median, not reached vs. 8.4 months; HR = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.84; P = 0.02) and OS (median, not reached vs. 19.2 months; HR = 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.73; P < 0.01) than the nonsurgery group. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were observed in 11 (11/30, 36.7%) patients, and immune-related pneumonitis was observed in 5 (5/24, 20.8%) patients. Post-CRT minimal residual disease before surgery was associated with unfavorable PFS and OS., Conclusions: Our study met the primary endpoint. Conversion CRT and subsequent iCT followed by surgery was a promising treatment strategy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (sqNSCLC) is associated with a poorer prognosis and limited treatment options. Sintilizumab combined with chemotherapy is used as first-line treatment for advanced sqNSCLC. However, the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for severe squamous NSCLC remain to be unknown in clinical studies., Methods: Patients with confirmed unresectable stage III/IV sqNSCLC were retrospectively collected between July 1 st , 2019, and December 31 st . According to performance status (PS) scores, these patients received first-line sintilimab plus nab-PTX-based chemotherapy were divided into severe (PS=2) and non-severe groups (PS=0-1). The treatment regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles, or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess progression free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including the objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs) and disease control rate (DCR)., Results: Among 367 patients with unresectable stage III/IV sqNSCLC, 28 male patients, with a median age of 65.5 years, received first-line sintilimab plus nab-PTX-based chemotherapy. These patients were divided into a severe group (11 patients) and a non-severe group (17 patients). The severe group had a significantly higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to the non-severe group (54.5% vs 11.8%, p = 0.03). The two groups had a similar median number of treatment cycles and safety profiles. Although the severe group showed higher ORR (63.6% vs 47.1%) and DCR (100% vs 76.5%) than the non-severe group, these differences were not statistically significant. Median PFS and Kaplan-Meier curves were also comparable between the groups., Conclusion: Sintilimab combined with nab-PTX-based chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated in a small sample of severe lung squamous cell carcinoma population. This combination may offer a potential treatment option for these patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Zhong et al.)

Albumin is a nature-derived, versatile protein carrier, that has been explored extensively by researchers for anticancer drug delivery due to its role in enhancing drug stability, solubility, circulation time, targeting capabilities, and overall therapeutic efficacy. Albumin nanoparticles possess inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and passive tumor-targeting ability due to the enhanced permeability and retention effect. However, non-specific accumulation of cytotoxic agents in healthy tissues remains a challenge. In this paper, the functionalization of albumin nanoparticles using various biomolecules including antibodies, nucleic acids, proteins and peptides, vitamins, chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid, and lactobionic acid have been discussed which enables specific recognition and binding to cancer cells. Furthermore, we highlight the supremacy of such a targeted approach in tumor-specific drug delivery, minimization of off-target effects, potential improvement in therapeutic efficacy, cellular internalization, reduced side effects, and better clinical outcomes. This review centers on how they have revolutionized the field of biomedical research and tuned into an excellent targeted approach. In conclusion, this review highlights in detail the role of albumin as a nanocarrier for tumor-targeted delivery using biomolecules as ligands., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Background: Alternating sequential administration of drugs may be a promising approach to overcome chemotherapy resistance in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)., Methods: This study was an open-label, single-arm, and prospective trial included patients with untreated advanced PDAC. They received 2 cycles of NS regimen (nab-paclitaxel:125 mg/m2, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, plus S-1:40-60 mg, orally twice per day for 1-14 days) followed by 2 cycles of GemOx regimen (gemcitabine, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, and oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2, intravenously injected on day 1). The primary efficacy endpoint was a progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFSR-6m). The secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Specific mRNA transcripts were used to explore survival associated genes., Results: Forty-two patients received a minimum of one treatment cycle, and of these, 30 patients completed one alternating treatment consisting of 4 cycles. The PFSR-6m was 71% (95% CI = 58%-87%). The median PFS and OS were 6.53 months (95% CI = 6.03-8.43) and 11.4 months (95% CI = 9.8-14.4), respectively. Common grades 3-4 hematological AEs included neutropenia 30.9%, leukopenia 26.2%, anemia 2.4%, and thrombocytopenia in 11.9%. Patients with OS > 10 months showed high expression of HLA-DQA2 while melanoma-associated antigen genes (MAGE) were notably upregulated in patients with OS < 10 months., Conclusion: The alternating sequential administration of the NS and GemOx regimens may be a novel approach for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced PDAC requiring further study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ChiCTR1900024867)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Overall, 30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] fail intravenous [IV] steroids, requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in the present study., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomised in 1:1 ratio to either albumin + standard of care [SOC] + EEN [Albumin arm] or SOC + EEN [SOC arm], over January 2021-February 2023. Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in the Albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% weight/volume [w/v] intravenous albumin [100 ml]. Primary outcome was first, steroid failure [need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy] and second, proportion of patients with adverse events., Results: In all, 61 patients [albumin: 30, SOC: 31][mean age 31.6 ± 0.4 years, male 57.4%], were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between Albumin and SOC arms (10/30 [33.33%] vs 13/31[41.94%], p = 0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate [10% vs 9.68%, p = 1], response to salvage medical therapy [88.89% vs 76.92%, p = 0.62] and median [interquartile range] duration of hospitalisation [10.5 [7-16] vs 10 [7-20], p = 0.43] were also comparable. The long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the Albumin than the SOC arm [37.04% vs 17.86%, p > 0.05], although this did not reach statistical significance., Conclusion: There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity in tumor cells enhances chemotherapy efficacy. We evaluated the selective GR modulator relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who had received at least 2 prior therapy lines., Patients and Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase III study, patients received once-daily oral relacorilant (100 mg, titrated to 150 mg in 25 mg increments/cycle) and nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), target gene modulation, and safety were also assessed., Results: Of 43 patients enrolled, 31 were evaluable for ORR (12 did not reach first postbaseline radiographic assessment). An interim analysis to assess whether ORR was ≥10% showed no confirmed responses and the study was discontinued. Two (6.5%) patients attained unconfirmed partial responses and 15 (48.4%) had stable disease. Fourteen of 31 (45.2%) patients had reductions in target lesion size, despite prior nab-paclitaxel exposure in 12 of the 14. Median PFS and OS were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-4.2) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.9), respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue and nausea. RNA analysis confirmed that relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel suppressed 8 cortisol target genes of interest., Conclusion: Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel showed modest antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mPDAC, with no new safety signals. Studies of this combination in other indications with a high unmet medical need are ongoing., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background/aim: Inflammation-based prognostic scores have shown prognostic significance and have been associated with clinical outcomes in various types of cancer. Inflammation is known to promote tumor progression leading to reduced survival. In pancreatic cancer, systemic inflammation is common and contributes to its dismal prognosis. Although the prognosis of pancreatic cancer is improving with the introduction of new drugs, the prognostic indicators are still poorly understood. The present study aimed to evaluate inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: A total of 43 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy (gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel and mFOLFIRINOX) in our institution were analyzed. Baseline clinicopathological and pre-treatment laboratory data were collected. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival differences were evaluated using the log-rank test., Results: In the whole cohort, we identified lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio ≥3, systemic inflammatory response index <2.3, carcinoembryonic antigen <2.5, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio <5, Memorial Sloane Kettering score <2, and prognostic index <2 as prognostic markers associated with improved overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy., Conclusion: The current analysis showed an association between inflammatory-based prognostic markers and overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in a real-world setting at a single institution., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The efficacy of cytotoxic chemo-therapy has been reported to improve after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration. We previously conducted a multicenter prospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) after ICI treatment. In that study, some patients showed a long-term response to nab-PTX, which is not usually observed with single-agent chemotherapy. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed updated data from 29 patients enrolled in our clinical study who received nab-PTX monotherapy after ICI treatment. We defined a "long-term responder" as a patient who achieved a 1-year progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Among the 29 patients, 10 (34.5%) were long-term responders, two of whom achieved a 5-year PFS. A key difference between long-term and non-long-term responders was that the long-term responders had a significantly higher number of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status of 0 (70.0% versus 10.5%; p=0.002). Furthermore, median cycles of previous ICIs and median treatment cycles were significantly higher in long-term responders than in non-long-term responders (8 cycles versus 3 cycles; p=0.03) (5.9 months versus 2.0 months; p=0.02). In the 10 long-term responders, six patients required at least a one-stage dose reduction owing to adverse events, and four patients required a two-stage dose reduction., Conclusion: Nab-PTX administration after ICI treatment may elicit a long-term response. A long-term response can be achieved even with a dose reduction due to adverse events., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Nanoliposomal irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and L-leucovorin (nal-IRI/FL) is the standard regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer, but there are no reports on prediction of early discontinuation. In this study, we investigated predictive factors of early discontinuation of nal-IRI/FL., Patients and Methods: The study included 36 patients who received nal-IRI/FL at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between June 2021 and May 2022. Those with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) ≤28 days were defined as the early discontinuation group (group ED), and those with TTF >28 days were placed in the continuation group (group C). Laboratory data were collected just before and every 14 days after initiation of nal-IRI/FL treatment., Results: There were six patients (16.7%) in group ED and 30 patients (83.3%) in group C. The lymphocyte×albumin (LA) score before therapy was significantly lower in group ED (p=0.005). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, pre-treatment LA was the best predictor for early discontinuation, with a cutoff value of 4,142 (sensitivity: 1.00, specificity: 0.77, p=0.004). In group C, LA was significantly lower at 28 days before nal-IRI/FL treatment failure compared to the value before the start of therapy [median with range: 3,299 (1,478-6,994) vs. 4,304 (2,085-8,085), p=0.006]., Conclusion: The LA score is a useful marker for evaluating treatment continuity, and especially early discontinuation, of nal-IRI/FL in patients with pancreatic cancer., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Nab-paclitaxel is used to treat patients with pancreatic cancer. However, it frequently induces peripheral neuropathy. Notably, pharmacokinetic factors may be associated with neuropathic symptoms as the onset depends on the cumulative dose. Therefore, we prospectively examined the association between the cumulative dose of nab-paclitaxel at the onset of peripheral neuropathy and polymorphisms of hepatic transporter genes., Patients and Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer receiving nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) were enrolled. Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Patient-Reported Outcomes CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx), every 2-12 weeks, and every 4 weeks thereafter. solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) 521T>C, 388A>G; SLCO1B3 rs11045585; ATP-binding cassette transporters, subfamily B, member 1 (ABCB1) 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T; ABCC1 rs2644983; ABCC2 24C>T; and ABCG2 421C>A were analyzed by direct sequencing. Correlations between transporter genotypes and cumulative dose at symptom onset were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests., Results: In total, 25 patients were enrolled. The lowest median cumulative dose for nab-paclitaxel at peripheral neuropathy onset using PRO-CTCAE was 593 mg. By CTCAE it was 800 mg, and by FACT/GOG-Ntx it was 1,090 mg (p<0.0001). At symptom onset, patients with ABCC2 -24C/T genotype had received a significantly lower median cumulative dose by PRO-CTCAE (540 mg) than those with C/C (720 mg) (p=0.0188). However, the other polymorphisms studied were not associated with symptoms., Conclusion: Herein, we found for the first time that ABCC2 -24C/T genotype was significantly associated with the onset of nab-paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy detected with PRO-CTCAE., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

The most commonly used fluids for volume therapy are crystalloids and colloids. Crystalloids comprise 0.9% sodium chloride and balanced crystalloids (BC). Colloids can be divided into artificial colloids and human albumin (a natural colloid). Large studies show advantages for BC over 0.9% NaCl with respect to renal endpoints, probably due to the unphysiologically high chloride content of 0.9% NaCl. However, other studies, such as the BaSICS and PLUS trials, showed no significant differences in mortality in a heterogeneous population. Despite this, meta-analyses suggest advantages for BC. Therefore, BC should be preferred, especially in patients at increased risk of acute kidney injury, with acidemia and/or hyperchloremia. Except for specific indications (e.g., in patients with cirrhosis, sepsis resuscitation after initial volume therapy with BC), albumin should not be used. There is clear evidence of harm from hydroxyethyl starch in intensive care patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have poor 5-year survival. Pharmacological ascorbate (P-AscH - , high dose, intravenous, vitamin C) has shown promise as an adjunct to chemotherapy. We hypothesized adding P-AscH - to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel would increase survival in patients with metastatic PDAC., Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer randomized 1:1 to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel only (SOC, control) or to SOC with concomitant P-AscH - , 75 g three times weekly (ASC, investigational). The primary outcome was overall survival with secondary objectives of determining progression-free survival and adverse event incidence. Quality of life and patient reported outcomes for common oncologic symptoms were captured as an exploratory objective. Thirty-six participants were randomized; of this 34 received their assigned study treatment. All analyses were based on data frozen on December 11, 2023., Results: Intravenous P-AscH - increased serum ascorbate levels from micromolar to millimolar levels. P-AscH - added to the gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (ASC) increased overall survival to 16 months compared to 8.3 months with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (SOC) (HR = 0.46; 90 % CI 0.23, 0.92; p = 0.030). Median progression free survival was 6.2 (ASC) vs. 3.9 months (SOC) (HR = 0.43; 90 % CI 0.20, 0.92; p = 0.029). Adding P-AscH - did not negatively impact quality of life or increase the frequency or severity of adverse events., Conclusions: P-AscH - infusions of 75 g three times weekly in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer prolongs overall and progression free survival without detriment to quality of life or added toxicity (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02905578)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Transcriptional profiling of pancreatic cancers has defined two main transcriptional subtypes: classical and basal. Initial data suggest shorter survival for patients with basal tumors and differing treatment sensitivity to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel by transcriptional subtype., Experimental Design: We examined 8,743 patients with RNA sequencing from pancreatic cancers performed at Caris Life Sciences. Classical and basal subtypes were identified using purity independent subtyping algorithm on RNA sequencing, and two cohorts were analyzed: (i) the biomarker cohort included patients with complete molecular profiling data (n = 7,250) and (ii) the outcome cohort included patients with metastatic disease with available survival outcomes (n = 5,335). A total of 3,842 patients were shared between the two cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess patient survival., Results: In the biomarker cohort, 3,063 tumors (42.2%) were strongly classical (SC) and 2,015 tumors (27.8%) were strongly basal (SB). SC and SB tumors showed strong associations with histologic phenotypes and biopsy sites. SB tumors had higher rates of KRAS, TP53, and ARID1A mutations, lower rates of SMAD4 mutation, and transcriptional evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Sixty of 77 cases (78%) maintained their transcriptional subtype between temporally and/or spatially disparate lesions. In the outcome cohort, the SB subtype was associated with shorter overall survival time, regardless of whether they received FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy. The mutant KRAS allele type was prognostic of outcomes; however, this impact was restricted to SC tumors, whereas all mutant KRAS alleles had similarly poor outcomes in SB tumors., Conclusions: The SB subtype is a strong independent predictor of worse outcomes, regardless of the up-front chemotherapy regimen used. Clinical trials should further investigate pancreatic cancer transcriptional subtypes as a prognostic and predictive biomarker., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

STING agonists can activate natural and adaptive immune responses, and are expected to become a new type of immunotherapy drug for tumor therapy. However, how to target deliver STING agonists to tumor tissues is a key factor affecting the efficacy of tumor treatment. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) has become a research hotspot in the field of cancer treatment due to its non-invasive, spatiotemporally controllable, and high tissue penetration capabilities. Therefore, how to choose the appropriate drug delivery strategy, build a suitable drug delivery system to co-deliver photosensitizers and STING agonists, is a challenge faced in the tumor treatment. In this study, we developed an albumin-based nanodelivery system named FA-ICG&MnOx@HSA that co-loaded the sonosensitizers indocyanine green (ICG) and manganese oxide (MnOx). This approach achieved folate receptor-targeting mediated tumor delivery and tumor microenvironment (TME)-responsive release facilitated by high levels of glutathione (GSH) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), which catalyze oxygen generation to potentiate SDT efficacy in killing tumors and inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD). Simultaneously, the released Mn 2+ acted as a STING agonist promoting dendritic cell maturation, IFN-β production, and proliferation of T cells. Ultimately, this albumin based co-loaded sonosensitizer and STING agonist demonstrated promising potential for advancing tumor treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated the feasibility of completing 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) and carboplatin (C) in a single arm prospective clinical trial for advanced/recurrent EC and safety and efficacy of day (D) 1, 8 nab-P in combination with D1 C q3weeks., Methods: Patients with early-stage, high-risk, advanced primary/recurrent EC without prior platinum/taxane exposure were enrolled in an open-label, single-institution trial (NCT02744898). Patients received 6 cycles of D1 nab-P 100 mg/m 2 IV with C AUC 6 IV and D8 nab-P 100 mg/m 2 IV q21D. The trial tested the null hypothesis that subjects completing 6 cycles was ≤0.50 versus the alternative that the proportion is ≥0.75 in a single stage design with alpha = 0.05 and power = 80% with 23 subjects. Patients who completed 6 cycles (primary outcome), objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were estimated with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods., Results: From 08/2016-03/2018, 23 patients were enrolled. Nineteen patients (82.6%, 95% CI: 61.2%, 95.0%) completed 6 cycles, thus we could reject our null. Twelve patients (52.2%) experienced ≥1 grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events including: anemia, 6 (26.1%); neutropenia, 5 (21.7%); diarrhea, 3 (13.0%). Fourteen patients (60.1%) reported grade 1 neuropathy. Of 9 patients with measurable target lesions, the ORR was 33.3% (95% CI: 7.5%, 70.1%) and CBR was 55.6% (95% CI: 21.2%, 86.3%). Median PFS in the advanced/recurrent patients was 23.2 (95% CI: 12.1, NR) months., Conclusions: The nab-P/C D1, 8 regimen met pre-specified feasibility criteria with acceptable toxicity and efficacy. Use of nab-P decreases need for steroid pre-medications, and this carboplatin doublet may prove advantageous for trials assessing combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced EC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

There are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal treatment sequence for advanced pancreatic cancer, as head-to-head phase III randomised trials are missing. We assess real-world effectiveness of three common sequential treatment strategies by emulating a hypothetical randomised trial. This analysis included 1551 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 613) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB; n = 938) as palliative first-line treatment. We used marginal structural modelling to compare overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between three common first- to second-line treatment sequences, adjusting for time-varying potential confounding. The sequences were: FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and GEMNAB→nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) + 5-fluorouracil. Outcome was also calculated stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the Pancreatic Cancer Score. Median OS and TTD of HRQoL independent of risk were 10.7 [8.9, 11.9] and 6.4 [4.8, 7.7] months for FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, 8.4 [7.4, 9.7] and 5.8 [4.6, 7.1] months for GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and 8.9 [7.8, 10.4] and 4.6 [4.1, 6.1] months for GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil. Compared to FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, OS and TTD were worse for poor-risk patients with GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF (OS: HR 2.09 [1.47, 2.98]; TTD: HR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27]) and those with GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil (OS: HR 1.35, [0.76, 2.39]; TTD: HR 2.62 [1.56, 4.42]). Brackets denote 95%-confidence intervals. The estimated real-world effectiveness of the three treatment sequences evaluated were largely comparable. Poor-risk patients might benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Future randomised trials on sequential treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) whose tumors are deemed unlikely to be completely cytoreduced to no gross residual disease (R0) or who are poor surgical candidates. This Ib/II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages III-IV, unresectable OC., Methods: Eligible patients with stage III-IV, unresectable OC were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study. All patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m 2 , day 1, every 3 weeks) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1, every 3 weeks) for 3 cycles before surgery, followed by 3-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety; the phase II primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety (for all populations)., Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and were given neoadjuvant therapy treated between October 2019 and December 2020, of whom 9 were in the phase Ib portion and 53 in the phase II portion. A total of 53 patients underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 73.6% (95% CI, 59.7-84.7%). With a median follow-up of 17.5 (range 0.7-36.7) months, for all patients, the best ORR was 83.9% (95% CI, 71.7-92.4%) with 47 partial responses, the median PFS was 18.6 (95% CI, 13.8-23.3%) months, and median OS was not reached. During the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 91.9% (57/62) of all patients. The most common hematologic TRAEs were neutropenia (55/62, 88.7%), and non-hematologic toxicity was alopecia (36/62, 58.1%). Forty-nine patients (79.0%) experienced at least one grade 3-4 TRAEs, with the most common was neutropenia (44/62, 71.0%). Besides, delays in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery due to AEs were observed in 9 (1 in phase Ib; 8 in phase II) and 7 (phase II) patients, respectively., Conclusions: The study demonstrated an encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of neoadjuvant chemotherapy nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in stage III-IV, unresectable OC. In addition, AEs resulting in chemotherapy and surgery delays should be cautiously considered in this clinical setting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR1900026893. Registered at 25 October 2019., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Ramucirumab (RAM) is recommended as premedication with H 1 -receptor antagonists (H 1 RA) to prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs). However, RAM is a human antibody with a low incidence of IRRs. We evaluated the noninferiority of non-H 1 RA (dexamethasone [DEX] alone) premedication to H 1 RA (plus DEX) premedication in terms of IRRs in patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX)., Methods: This was a noninferiority, multicenter, retrospective trial conducted in three Japanese centers to assess the incidence of IRRs in patients receiving RAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer between 2018 and 2023. Patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nab-PTX were divided into groups with and without H 1 RA premedication. The incidence of IRRs was compared between the two groups., Results: Ninety patients were evaluated, with non-H 1 RA and H 1 RA premedications in 43 and 47 cases, respectively. After the first dose of RAM, IRRs were not observed in either group. IRRs during the overall doses were 0% for non-H 1 RA premedication and 2.1% for H 1 RA premedication (90% confidence interval (CI): -5.6%-1.3% for each comparison). The upper limit of the 90% CI (1.3%) did not exceed the noninferiority margin (Δ) of + 10% and therefore met the noninferiority criteria., Conclusion: RAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer with DEX premedication may be possible without H 1 RA premedication., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

As a first-line chemotherapeutic agent, albumin-bound paclitaxel (PA) has a considerable effect on the treatment of various cancers. However, in chemotherapy for hepatocarcinoma, the sensitivity to PA is low owing to the innate resistance of hepatocarcinoma cells; the toxicity and side effects are severe, and the clinical treatment impact is poor. In this study, we present a unique nanodrug delivery system. The ultraviolet (UV)-induced tumor-cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated and purified by differential centrifugation. Then, PA was loaded by coextrusion to create a vesicle drug delivery system (EVPA). By employing the EV-dependent enhanced retention effect and specific homing effect, EVPA would passively and actively target tumor tissues, activate the immune response to release PA, and achieve the combination therapeutic effect of chemo-immunotherapy on hepatocarcinoma. We demonstrated that the tumor-killing effect of EVPA is superior to that of PA, both in vivo and in vitro and that EVPA can be effectively taken up by hepatocarcinoma and dendritic cells, activate the body's specific immune response, promote the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues, and exert a precise killing effect on hepatocarcinoma cells via chemo-immunotherapy.

Background: Oxaliplatin- and fluoropyrimidine-based triplet regimens have demonstrated feasibility and efficacy in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. Herein, we evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of biweekly nab-paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1/leucovorin (SOLAR) in chemonaïve UGI cancers., Methods: A 3 + 3 phase 1 study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in SOLAR (nab-paclitaxel [150 mg/m2 in D1], oxaliplatin [60, 75, or 85 mg/m2 in D1], and oral S-1/leucovorin [35 mg/m2 and 30 mg bid from D1 to D7]). The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: Thirteen and 6 accruals were in the dose-escalation and MTD expansion cohorts, respectively. One of 6 patients at level III experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea), which revealed that the MTD of oxaliplatin was 85 mg/m2. After a mean of 15.9 cycles of treatment, the most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (57.9%) and diarrhea (21.1%). The ORR was 63.2%. The median PFS and OS were 12.5 and 24.7 months, respectively., Conclusion: The current study revealed the MTD of oxaliplatin and demonstrated the preliminary efficacy of SOLAR in UGI cancers, which deserves further investigation., Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162510., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC)., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n = 32; AG, n = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group., Conclusion: The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but they have been known to cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) by promoting T-cell activation. Neurological irAEs are rare (1%) but have a high fatality rate (11.5%). Here we report the first case of Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE) induced by an ICI. A woman in her 60s with metastatic breast cancer was treated with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel once intravenously. Eighteen days later, she lost consciousness with ophthalmoplegia and was diagnosed with a neurological irAE. She recovered consciousness immediately with the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) but suffered severe permanent peripheral neuropathy. Although it is just one case, this experience shows that BBE occurring as a neurological irAE of ICI cancer treatment may be associated with more severe outcomes than conventional BBE in metastatic cancer. Creating a system for multidisciplinary treatment is essential for ICI therapy., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Intravenous volume loading is a common treatment when hypovolemia is a potential cause of oliguria. We studied whether the effectiveness of Ringer's solution and 20% albumin in inducing diuresis differs depending on the mean arterial pressure (MAP). For this purpose, volume kinetic analysis was performed based on urine output and hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution obtained during and after 136 infusions of Ringer and 85 infusions of 20% albumin. Covariance analysis quantified the diuretic response at different arterial pressures. The results show that the diuretic response to a known plasma volume expansion was greater for Ringer's solution above a MAP of 70 mmHg, while 20% albumin was significantly more effective at lower pressures (p < 0.03). Simulations of the urinary output in response to infusion of a predefined fluid volume yielded superior efficacy for 20% albumin when the MAP was low, while Ringer's was similarly effective when the MAP averaged 100 mmHg. In conclusion, urine output in response to plasma volume expansion with 20% albumin was similar to, or even stronger, than that of Ringer's solution when the MAP was below 70 mmHg., (© 2024 The Author(s). Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.)

To evaluate the hemodynamic effects and the safety profile of fluid bolus resuscitation with hypertonic saline albumin (HSA) in critically ill children, we performed a prospective observational pilot study between October 2018 and May 2021 in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Sixty-four HSA boluses were analyzed in 23 patients. A mean volume of 5.7 ml/kg (Standard Deviation, SD 2.3 ml/kg) per bolus was infused. Acute hypotension was the main indication. 91% of the patients had a cardiac disease, 56% of them had undergone cardiac surgery in the previous 72 h, and 47.8% associated right ventricular dysfunction. A significant increase in systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressure and a decrease in the vasoactive index was observed after the infusion of HSA. This effect lasted for twenty-four hours (p < 0.05). Moreover, the amount of fluid requirements decreased significantly in the 6 h following HSA infusion [8.7 ml/kg (SD 9.6) vs. 15.1 ml/kg (SD 13.6) in the previous 6 h (p < 0.05)]. Serum levels of sodium and chloride increased after the infusion, reaching their peak concentration after one hour (143 mEq/L (SD 3.5) and 109.7 mEq/L (SD 6) respectively). HSA-related metabolic acidosis or acute kidney injury were not observed in this study. Hypertonic saline albumin is safe and effective when infused at a dose of 5 ml/kg in critically ill children. However, further research is required to confirm our findings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Compare hemodynamics between 4% albumin and Ringer's acetate., Design: Exploratory analysis of the double-blind randomized ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery trial., Setting: Single-center study in Helsinki University Hospital., Participants: We included 1,386 on-pump cardiac surgical patients., Intervention: We used 4% albumin or Ringer's acetate administration for cardiopulmonary bypass priming, volume replacement intraoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively., Measurements and Main Results: Hypotension (time-weighted average mean arterial pressure of <65 mmHg) and hyperlactatemia (time-weighted average blood lactate of >2 mmol/L) incidences were compared between trial groups in the operating room (OR), and early (0-6 hours) and late (6-24 hours) postoperatively. Associations of hypotension and hyperlactatemia with the ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery primary outcome (≥1 major adverse event [MAE]) were studied. In these time intervals, hypotension occurred in 118, 48, and 17 patients, and hyperlactatemia in 313, 131, and 83 patients. Hypotension and hyperlactatemia associated with MAE occurrence. Hypotension did not differ between the groups (albumin vs Ringer's: OR, 8.8% vs 8.5%; early postoperatively, 2.7% vs 4.2%; late postoperatively, 1.2% vs 1.3%; all p > 0.05). In the albumin group, hyperlactatemia was less frequent late postoperatively (2.9% vs 9.1%; p < 0.001), but not earlier (OR, 22.4% vs 23.6%; early postoperatively, 7.9% vs 11.0%; both p > 0.025 after Bonferroni-Holm correction)., Conclusions: In on-pump cardiac surgery, hypotension and hyperlactatemia are associated with the occurrence of ≥1 MAE. Compared with Ringer's acetate, albumin did not decrease hypotension and decreased hyperlactatemia only late postoperatively. Albumin's modest hemodynamic effect is concordant with the finding of no difference in MAEs between albumin and Ringer's acetate in the ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery trial., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Hanna Vlasov reports that Prothya Biosolutions Ltd (former Sanquin Plasma Products) Amsterdam, The Netherlands, supported financially the ALBICS trial., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to evaluate the dynamic relationship between the concentrations of total and unbound paclitaxel, and the exposure-response analysis of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) after pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer., Methods: A total of 653 concentrations corresponding to total paclitaxel and 334 concentrations corresponding to unbound paclitaxel were analyzed in 24 subjects who randomized received a single 260 mg/m 2 dose of two nab-paclitaxel formulations with a 21-35-day washout period. PEG-G-CSF was administered to all the patients in each cycle to prevent neutropenia. The exposure-response relationships were evaluated using the exposure to total, albumin-coated, and unbound paclitaxel, as well as the reduction in neutrophil count. The exposure data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. A linear regression model was used to test the statistical significance of the correlation between percentage of reduction in neutrophil count and exposure., Results: The PK characteristics of total paclitaxel were described using a three-compartment model with first-order elimination, and a mechanism-based model incorporating linear release of nab-paclitaxel and the saturated binding of unbound paclitaxel to plasma components was established. The release ratio of paclitaxel from nab-paclitaxel was estimated to be 4.60% and the maximum unbound fraction (2.76%) was reached at the end of the infusion. The study found that a longer duration of total paclitaxel concentration > 0.19 µmol/L was significantly correlated with a reduction in neutrophil count (r 2  = 0.23, P = 0.00062). Specifically, a duration of > 8.6 h was a predictor of a decreased neutrophil count., Conclusion: The decrease in neutrophils induced by nab-paclitaxel was significantly correlated with the duration above a total paclitaxel concentration of 0.19 µmol/L despite the use of PEG-G-CSF., (© 2024. Crown.)

Background: A standardised dose-reduction strategy has not been established for the widely used gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of alternating treatment cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy and gemcitabine alone versus continuous treatment with the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination., Methods: ALPACA was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at 29 study centres across Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had not been previously treated for advanced disease were enrolled. After an induction phase with three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by stratified permuted block randomisation either to continue treatment with standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine or to receive alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Randomisation was done centrally by the study statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list, and was stratified by Karnofsky Performance Status and presence of liver metastases. The primary endpoint was the derivation of an unbiased point estimate and an associated confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 80% for the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after randomisation, without testing a specific hypothesis, analysed by intention to treat in all patients who started randomised treatment. Safety was analysed according to treatment received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02564146, and is completed., Findings: Between May 27, 2016, and May 27, 2021, 325 patients were enrolled. Following three cycles of induction treatment, 174 patients were randomly assigned: 85 to continue receiving standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, of whom 79 started treatment, and 89 to the alternating treatment schedule, of whom 88 started treatment. Of the 167 patients who started randomised treatment, 88 (53%) were female and 79 (47%) were male. Median overall survival after randomisation was 10·4 months (80% CI 9·2-12·0) in the group that received standard treatment and 10·5 months (10·2-11·1) in the group that received alternating treatment (HR 0·90, 80% CI 0·72-1·13; p=0·56). The most common adverse events of any grade were peripheral neuropathy (59 [74%] of 80 patients in the continuous treatment group vs 53 [62%] of 85 patients in the alternating treatment group) and fatigue (43 [54%] vs 44 [52%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events after randomisation occurred in 40 (50%) patients in the continuous treatment group and in 28 (33%) in the alternating treatment group. Fewer treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in patients treated with alternating cycles compared with those receiving standard therapy, especially for peripheral neuropathy (17 [21%] patients in the continuous treatment group vs 12 [14%] in the alternating treatment group) and infections (16 [20%] vs nine [11%]). There were two treatment-related deaths after randomisation, both in the continuous treatment group (one multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, not treated after randomisation, and one interstitial lung disease)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that a dose-reduced regimen with alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone after three induction cycles is associated with similar overall survival to that for standard treatment with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, but with improved tolerability. We therefore propose that a switch to the alternating schedule could be considered in a clinical setting for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have at least stable disease after three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine treatment., Funding: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KD reports honoraria from AstraZeneca and support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Servier, GSK, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. SB reports honoraria for scientific presentations from Celgene, Servier, and MSD, fees for consultancy or advisory roles from Celgene, Servier, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Lilly. MR reports honoraria for speakers' bureaus from Roche, Falk, and Servier and approved patents (EP18783030.2-1109, combination treatment of pancreatic cancer targeting PI3K signalling; EP20206259.2, analysis of tissue samples using quantitative phase-contrast microscopy). TJE reports research funding from Baxalta/Shire, support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Ipsen, fees for consultancy or advisory roles from Eisai, MSD, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Lilly, Ipsen, and Daiichi Sankyo Europe. OW reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Zentiva, consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Servier, and support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Abbvie, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Ipsen, Medac, Merck, Pierre Fabre, and Roche. DPM reports research funding to his institution from Amgen and Servier, honoraria from Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Onkowissen, Sanofi, Lilly, Institut für klinische Krebsforschung, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Incyte, and Takeda, and fees for consultancy or advisory roles from Merck Serono, Amgen, MSD, Roche, Servier, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Cor2Ed, IQvia, and Onkowissen. PM reports grants from Lilly, royalties and licenses from Elsevier, consultancy fees from Lilly and Ipsen, honoraria for speakers' bureaus from Falk, Amgen, and Roche, and support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Galapagos. DP reports consultancy fees and honoraria paid to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Deciphera, and PharmaMar, support for travel, accommodation, and expenses paid to his institution from PharmaMar, fees for consultancy or advisory roles paid to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Deciphera, PharmaMar, and Thermosome, and research funding paid to his institution from Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar, Roche, EUSA Pharma, and Boehringer Ingelheim. AR-S reports honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, MCI Group, and AstraZeneca, support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Roche, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, and MSD, fees for consultancy or advisory roles from Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen-Cilag, and Servier, and research funding paid to her institution from Roche, Celgene, Ipsen, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Servier, AIO-Studien, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Erytech Pharma, and BioNTech. HP reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca, support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Abbvie, iOMEDICO, and Merck, fees for consultancy or advisory roles from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead, Amgen, Abbvie, GSK, BeiGene, Oncopeptides, Incyte, Seagen, and Kedrion, and leadership and fiduciary roles for PiTri Studien. VH reports research funding paid to his institution from Merck, Amgen, and Roche, fees for consultancy and advisory roles from Merck, Amgen, Roche, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, TERUMO, GSK, Servier/Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Oncosil, and Nordic Bioscience, honoraria from Roche, Amgen, Sanofi, Merck, Servier, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Seagen, and support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from Merck. FK reports research funding from Celgene and consultancy fees from Bayer and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objectives: International guidelines recommend IV crystalloid as the primary fluid for sepsis resuscitation, with 5% human albumin solution (HAS) as the second line. However, it is unclear which fluid has superior clinical effectiveness. We conducted a trial to assess the feasibility of delivering a randomized controlled trial comparing balanced crystalloid against 5% HAS as sole early resuscitation fluid in patients with sepsis presenting to hospital., Design: Multicenter, open, parallel-group randomized feasibility trial., Setting: Emergency departments (EDs) in 15 U.K. National Health Service (NHS) hospitals., Patients: Adult patients with sepsis and a National Early Warning Score 2 greater than or equal to five requiring IV fluids withing one hour of randomization., Interventions: IV fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloid or 5% HAS for the first 6 hours following randomization., Measurements and Main Results: Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate and 30-day mortality. We successfully recruited 301 participants over 12 months. Mean ( sd ) age was 69 years (± 16 yr), and 151 (50%) were male. From 1303 participants screened; 502 participants were potentially eligible and 300 randomized to receive trial intervention with greater than 95% of participants receiving the intervention. The median number of participants per site was 19 (range, 1-63). Thirty-day mortality was 17.9% ( n = 53). Thirty-one participants died (21.1%) within 30 days in the 5% HAS arm, compared with 22 participants (14.8%) in the crystalloid arm (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CIs, 0.84-2.83)., Conclusions: Our results suggest it is feasible to recruit critically ill patients to a fluid resuscitation trial in U.K. EDs using 5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid. There was lower mortality in the balanced crystalloid arm. Given these findings, a definitive trial is likely to be deliverable, but the point estimates suggest such a trial would be unlikely to demonstrate a significant benefit from using 5% HAS as a primary resuscitation fluid in sepsis., Competing Interests: Dr. Bell is supported by the National Institute of Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London. Dr. Gray’s, Ms. Oatey’s, Dr. Irvine’s, Mr. Kennel’s, Dr. Norrie’s, Dr. Walsh’s, and Dr. Hall’s institutions received funding from the John Moulton Charitable Trust. Dr. Gray, Ms. Grahamslaw, and Dr. Appelboam received support for article research from the John Moulton Charitable Trust. Ms. Oatey disclosed work for hire. Dr. Cafferkey’s institution received funding from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Sepsis FEAT Charity. Dr. Horner’s institution received funding from the National Institute for Health Research (132594). Mr. Skipworth received funding from Helsinn, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Actimed Therapeutics, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Introduction: The 2021 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) Practice Guidance recommends albumin infusion when removing ≥5 L of ascites to prevent post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction. However, the optimal criteria and scenarios for initiating albumin infusion subsequent to therapeutic paracentesis (TP) have been subject to limited scientific inquiry., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a US academic healthcare center. Participants received elective, outpatient TP between July 2019 and December 2022. Patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, post-TP clinical adjustments, and/or hospitalization were excluded. The institution strictly followed the AASLD Guidance. We used a sharp regression discontinuity (RD) design to estimate the effect of albumin infusion at the AASLD Guidance-recommended cutoff of 5 L on serum creatinine and sodium trajectory after TP., Results: Over the study period, 1,457 elective TPs were performed on 235 unique patients. Albumin infusion at the threshold of 5 L of ascites removal reduced serum creatinine levels by 0.046 mg/dL/d (95% confidence interval 0.003-0.116, P = 0.037) and increased serum sodium levels by 0.35 mEq/L/d (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.55, P = 0.001) compared with those who did not receive albumin infusion. The RD plots indicated worsened serum creatine/sodium levels after draining 3 L of fluid, approaching levels similar to or worse than with albumin infusion at 5 L or more., Discussion: Our RD models supported the 2021 AASLD Guidance with robust estimation of causal effect sizes at the cutoff level of 5 L. Nevertheless, the findings also highlight the need to further evaluate the efficacy of albumin infusion in patients who undergo elective TP and have 3-5 L of ascites removed., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC)., Methods: Data of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis., Results: The median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1-2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred., Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is one of the severe complications of decompensated stage cirrhosis that causes cerebral dysfunction due to hepatic insufficiency and/or portosystemic shunts, and it usually manifests as a wide spectrum of neurological or psychiatric abnormalities ranging from subclinical alterations to coma. The pathogenesis of HE is complex, although ammonia toxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, intestinal dysbiosis, and others among them mainly play an important role. The treatment for HE lacks specific drugs, and the current available drugs include non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose), antibiotics (rifaximin), and other therapies (oral branched-chain amino acids, intravenous injection of L-ornithine-L-aspartic acid, probiotics). Recent research has shown that human albumin is a safe and effective treatment for HE, improving not only cognitive function but also enhancing patients' quality of life.

Antiapoptotic protein, including Mcl-1, expression is frequently observed in pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel (GnP) is the standard chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC); however, predictive markers for its efficacy remain unestablished. This study evaluated the association between GnP's therapeutic effects and Mcl-1 expression in tissue samples obtained using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic tumor or percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy for metastatic liver tumor. We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients with histologically diagnosed MPC who received GnP as the first-line chemotherapy at our institute between December 2014 and July 2018. Post-immunohistochemistry analysis for Mcl-1 expression detection, patients were divided to into two groups based on the cell proportion showing Mcl-1 immunoreactivity: positive (> 20%; 23 [60.5%] patients) and negative (≤ 20%; 15 [39.5%] patients) groups. Clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The Mcl-1 positive group showed a significantly higher disease control rate (95.7% vs. 73.3%; P = 0.046), longer progressionfree survival (PFS) (7.2 months vs. 4.9 months; P = 0.018) and longer overall survival (OS) (14.9 months vs. 9.2 months; P = 0.008) than the Mcl-1 negative group. Multivariate analysis showed that Mcl-1 expression was an independent predictive marker for PFS and OS. Mcl-1 expression could be a predictive marker for favorable response to GnP., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients have very poor prognosis highlighting the urgent need of novel treatments. In this regard, repurposing non-oncology already-approved drugs might be an attractive strategy to offer more-effective treatment easily tested in clinical trials. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic deregulation is a hallmark of cancer contributing to treatment resistance in several solid tumors, including PDAC. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are epigenetic drugs we have investigated preclinically and clinically as anticancer agents. Valproic acid (VPA) is a generic low-cost anticonvulsant and mood stabilizer with HDAC inhibitory activity, and anticancer properties also demonstrated in PDAC models. Statins use was reported to be associated with lower mortality risk in patients with pancreatic cancer and statins have been shown to have a direct antitumor effect when used alone or in combination therapy. We recently showed capability of VPA/Simvastatin (SIM) combination to potentiate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in vitro and in vivo PDAC preclinical models., Methods/design: VESPA is a patient-centric open label randomized multicenter phase-II investigator-initiated trial, evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of VPA/SIM plus first line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens (AG or PAXG) (experimental arm) versus chemotherapy alone (standard arm) in mPDAC patients. The study involves Italian and Spanish oncology centers and includes an initial 6-patients safety run-in-phase. A sample size of 240 patients (120 for each arm) was calculated under the hypothesis that the addition of VPA/SIM to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel-based regimens may extend progression free survival from 6 to 9 months in the experimental arm. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, CA 19.9 reduction, toxicity, and quality of life. The study includes a patient engagement plan and complementary biomarkers studies on tumor and blood samples., Conclusions: VESPA is the first trial evaluating efficacy and safety of two repurposed drugs in oncology such as VPA and SIM, in combination with standard chemotherapy, with the aim of improving mPDAC survival. The study is ongoing. Enrollment started in June 2023 and a total of 63 patients have been enrolled as of June 2024., Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2022-004154-63; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05821556, posted 2023/04/20., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer has an abysmal prognosis with limited treatment options. Poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP), angiogenesis, and immune checkpoint inhibitors might improve the outcomes of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer, but accurate patient selections for those therapies remain a significant clinical challenge., Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biomarker-driven combinatorial therapies of pamiparib, tislelizumab, bevacizumab, and nab-paclitaxel in platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer., Study Hypothesis: A precision medicine combination of PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy will improve disease outcomes of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer by accounting for genomic and immunologic features., Trial Design: The BRIGHT Trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II, umbrella study planning to enroll 160 patients with serous, endometrioid, or clear cell platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer from 11 clinical centers in China. Patients are assigned to one of three experimental arms based on biomarkers. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations will receive pamiparib plus bevacizumab (arm 1, n=40) regardless of CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes count. Patients with wild-type BRCA1/2 ( BRCAwt ) and ≥3 CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes count will receive the combination of tislelizumab, bevacizumab, and nab-paclitaxel (arm 2, n=50), while BRCAwt patients with <3 CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes count will receive bevacizumab plus dose-dense nab-paclitaxel (arm 3, n=50). After completing patient enrollment in arm 2, another 20 BRCAwt patients with ≥3 CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes count will be included as an arm 2 expansion. Treatment will continue until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, and all adverse events will be recorded., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Eligible patients include those aged ≥18 with serous, endometrioid, or clear cell ovarian cancer, platinum-resistant recurrence, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1., Primary Endpoint: Objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigators by the RECIST 1.1 criteria., Sample Size: 160 patients., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Recruitment is estimated to be completed by 2024 and results may be published by 2027., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05044871., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The optimal treatment of burn shock is still unresolved. The problem of "fluid creep" continues despite modern devices that fail to improve outcomes over hourly urine output. Colloids, especially albumin, reduce fluid requirements. Albumin can be used either immediately at the start of resuscitation, or as a "rescue" when crystalloid use is excessive. Several studies confirm that when crystalloid resuscitation is "out of control" the majority of caregivers will add albumin to reduce fluid rates. A multi-center trial is underway comparing crystalloids with albumin to confirm the benefit of colloids. The next question is whether albumin or plasma is as the better colloid choice., Competing Interests: Disclosure The author is Principle Investigator of one current Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-19-1-664.JW180038, Acute Burn ResUscitation Prospective Multicenter Trial 2 [ABRUPT2]) (ClinicalTrials.gov – NCT04356859) that compares the use of albumin to lactated Ringer’s solution, and one completed Department of Defense grant (W81XWH-16-2-0048, Acute Burn ResUscitation Prospective Multicenter Trial [ABRUPT]) (ClinicalTrials.gov – NCT03144427) that are described in the paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a prognostic predictor for patients treated with chemotherapy in colorectal cancer, although scarce studies evaluated its potential in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). In this exploratory analysis of JCOG1407, a randomized phase II study comparing modified 5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP), we evaluated whether ETS can predict prognosis of patients with LAPC., Methods: Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 112 with measurable lesions were included in this study. ETS was defined as a ≥20 % reduction in tumor diameter compared with baseline at the initial imaging assessment 6-10 weeks after initiating chemotherapy. Patients were divided into the ETS (achieved ETS) and non-ETS (failed to achieve ETS) groups based on their ETS status. The impact of ETS on overall survival (OS) was compared using multivariable Cox regression analysis., Results: Fourteen of 55 (25.5 %) and 24 of 57 (42.1 %) patients in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively, achieved ETS. In the overall population, mFOLFIRINOX arm, and GnP arm, the median OS in the ETS and non-ETS groups was 27.1 and 20.4, 29.8 and 20.6, and 24.1 and 20.4, months, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios of OS for the ETS group in the overall population, mFOLFIRINOX arm, and GnP arm were 0.451 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.270-0.754), 0.371 (95 % CI: 0.149-0.926), and 0.508 (95 % CI: 0.255-1.004), respectively., Conclusions: ETS may be a prognostic predictor in chemotherapy-naïve patients with LAPC treated with mFOLFIRINOX or GnP., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JF reports grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, during the study, as well as grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, J-Ph arma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Sumitomo Dainippon, Astellas, Delta-Fly-Pharma, and Incyte Biosciences Japan and personal fees from Fujifilm, Delta-Fly-Pharma, Onco Therapy Science, Merck Biopharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Incyte Biosciences Japan, J-Pharma, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Yakult Honsha, Nihon Servier, Novartis Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Bayer, Teijin Pharma, Terumo, and Incyte Biosciences Japan outside the submitted work. KN reports personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Yakult Honsha, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. HI reports grants from Ono Pharmaceutical and Nihon Servier and personal fees from Nihon Servier, Yakult Honsha, Boston Scientific, Kaneka Medix, Medico's Hirata, and SB KAWASUMI LABORATORIES outside the submitted work. SS reports grants from AstraZeneca, Incyte Corporation, and Delta-Fly-Pharma outside the submitted work. SK reports personal fees from Yakult Honsha outside the submitted work. CM reports grants from Eisai, Yakult Honsha, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, J-Pharma, AstraZeneca, Merck Biopharma, Daiichi Sankyo, HITACHI, and Boehringer Ingelheim and personal fees from Yakult Honsha, MSD, Nihon Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, Teijin Pharma, Eisai, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. MU reports grants from Japan AMED and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, during the study, as well as grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, J-Pharma, AstraZeneca, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Astellas, Eisai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Delta-Fly-Pharma, Incyte Biosciences Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Novartis Pharma and personal fees from Yakult Honsha, MSD, Nihon Servier, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, J-Pharma, Incyte Biosciences Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Type-2 diabetes mellitus is a frequent comorbidity of cirrhosis independently associated with cirrhosis-related complications and mortality. This post hoc analysis of the ANSWER trial database assessed the effects of long-term human albumin (HA) administration on top of the standard medical treatment (SMT) on the clinical outcomes of a subgroup of 85 outpatients with liver cirrhosis, uncomplicated ascites and insulin-treated diabetes mellitus type 2 (ITDM). Compared to patients in the SMT arm, the SMT + HA group showed a better overall survival (86% vs. 57%, p = .016) and lower incidence rates of paracenteses, overt hepatic encephalopathy, bacterial infections, renal dysfunction and electrolyte disorders. Hospital admissions did not differ between the two arms, but the number of days spent in hospital was lower in the SMT + HA group. In conclusion, in a subgroup of ITDM outpatients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites, long-term HA administration was associated with better survival and a lower incidence of cirrhosis-related complications., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Long-term anti-angiogenesis leads to pruned vasculature, densely deposited extracellular matrix (ECM), and consequently reduced chemotherapy delivery in esophagogastric cancer (EGC). To address this issue, we evaluated the efficacy of adding a hyaluronidase or a NO-donor to the regimen of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs., Methods: A patient-derived EGC xenograft model was developed. Grafted mice were randomly assigned to four experimental groups and one control group. The experimental groups received DC101, a murine angiogenesis inhibitor, and nab-paclitaxel (NPTX), with the addition of hyaluronidase (PEGPH20), or NO-donor (nitroglycerine, NTG), or their combination, respectively. We compared tumor growth during 17 days of treatment. We performed immunohistochemistry for ECM components hyaluronan (HA) and collagen, CD31 for endothelial cells, and γH2AX for DNA damage. The positively stained areas were quantified, and vessel diameters were measured using QuPath software., Results: Prolonged DC101 treatment induced deposition of HA (p<0.01) and collagen (p<0.01). HA was effectively degraded by PEGPH20 (p<0.001), but not by NTG as expected. Both PEGPH20 (p<0.05) and NTG (p<0.01) dilated vessels collapsed in response to long-term DC101 treatment. However, only PEGPH20 (rather than NTG) was found to significantly inhibit tumor growth (p<0.05) in combination with NPTX and DC101., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the mechanical barrier of HA is the major reason responsible for the resistance developed during prolonged anti-angiogenesis in EGC. Incorporating PEGPH20 into the existing treatment regimen is promising to improve outcomes for patients with EGC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest HWML has acted as a consultant or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, and MSD (all related to checkpoint inhibitors) and for Amphera, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dragonfly, Eli Lilly, Nordic Pharma, and Servier; and has received research funding, medication supply, or both from Incyte, Merck, Roche, and Servier (all related to checkpoint inhibitors) and from Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Nordic Pharma, and Philips; and speaker roles for Astellas (related to checkpoint inhibitors), Benecke, Daiichi-Sankyo, JAAP, Medtalks, Novartis, and Travel Congress Management. MFB has received research funding from Celgene, Lead Pharma, and Frame Therapeutics, and acted as a consultant to Servier, Olympus, and Wholomics. None of these companies were involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of this study or drafting of the manuscript and decision to publish., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis is challenging. The EASL guidelines proposed an algorithm for the management of AKI, but this has never been validated. We aimed to prospectively evaluate this algorithm in clinical practice., Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study in consecutive hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI. The EASL management algorithm includes identification/treatment of precipitating factors, 2-day albumin infusion in patients with AKI ≥stage 1B, and treatment with terlipressin in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI). The primary outcome was treatment response, which included both full and partial response. Secondary outcomes were survival and adverse events associated with terlipressin therapy., Results: A total of 202 AKI episodes in 139 patients were included. Overall treatment response was 80%, while renal replacement therapy was required in only 8%. Response to albumin infusion was achieved in one-third of episodes. Of patients not responding to albumin, most (74%) did not meet the diagnostic criteria of HRS-AKI, with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) being the most common phenotype. The response rate in patients not meeting the criteria for HRS-AKI was 70%. Only 30 patients met the diagnostic criteria for HRS-AKI, and their response rate to terlipressin was 61%. Median time from AKI diagnosis to terlipressin initiation was only 2.5 days. While uNGAL (urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) could differentiate ATN from other phenotypes (AUROC 0.78), it did not predict response to therapy in HRS-AKI. Ninety-day transplant-free survival was negatively associated with MELD-Na, ATN and HRS-AKI as well as uNGAL. Three patients treated with terlipressin developed pulmonary edema., Conclusions: The application of the EASL AKI algorithm is associated with very good response rates and does not significantly delay initiation of terlipressin therapy., Impact and Implications: The occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cirrhosis is associated with poor short-term mortality. Improving its rapid identification and prompt management was the focus of the recently proposed EASL AKI algorithm. This is the first prospective study demonstrating that high AKI response rates are achieved with the use of this algorithm, which includes identification of AKI, treatment of precipitating factors, a 2-day albumin challenge in patients with AKI ≥1B, and supportive therapy in patients with persistent AKI not meeting HRS-AKI criteria or terlipressin with albumin in those with HRS-AKI. These findings support the use of this algorithm in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The multi-centre two-stage SCALOP-2 trial (ISRCTN50083238) assessed whether dose escalation of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or concurrent sensitization using the protease inhibitor nelfinavir improve outcomes in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following four cycles of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel., Methods: In stage 1, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nelfinavir concurrent with standard-dose CRT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) was identified from a cohort of 27 patients. In stage 2, 159 patients were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled comparison of standard versus high dose (60 Gy in 30 fractions) CRT, with or without nelfinavir at MTD. Primary outcomes following dose escalation and nelfinavir use were respectively overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Results: High dose CRT did not improve OS (16.9 (60 % confidence interval, CI 16.2-17.7) vs. 15.6 (60 %CI 14.3-18.2) months; adjusted hazard ratio, HR 1.13 (60 %CI 0.91-1.40; p = 0.68)). Similarly, median PFS was not improved by nelfinavir (10.0 (60 %CI 9.9-10.2) vs. 11.1 (60 %CI 10.3-12.8) months; adjusted HR 1.71 (60 %CI 1.38-2.12; p = 0.98)). Local progression at 12 months was numerically lower with high-dose CRT than with standard dose CRT (n = 11/46 (23.9 %) vs. n = 15/45 (33.3 %)). Neither nelfinavir nor radiotherapy dose escalation impacted on treatment compliance or grade 3/4 adverse event rate. There were no sustained differences in HRQoL scores between treatment groups over 28 weeks post-treatment., Conclusions: Dose-escalated CRT may improve local tumour control and is well tolerated when used as consolidative treatment in LAPC but does not impact OS. Nelfinavir use does not improve PFS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In preclinical models, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling drives resistance to taxane chemotherapy in multiple solid tumors via upregulation of antiapoptotic pathways. ORIC-101 is a potent and selective GR antagonist that was investigated in combination with taxane chemotherapy as an anticancer regimen preclinically and in a phase 1 clinical trial., Patients and Methods: The ability of ORIC-101 to reverse taxane resistance was assessed in cell lines and xenograft models, and a phase 1 study (NCT03928314) was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the dose, safety, and antitumor activity of ORIC-101 with nab-paclitaxel., Results: ORIC-101 reversed chemoprotection induced by glucocorticoids in vitro and achieved tumor regressions when combined with paclitaxel in both taxane-naïve and -resistant xenograft models. In the phase 1 study, 21 patients were treated in dose escalation and 62 patients were treated in dose expansion. All patients in dose expansion had previously progressed on a taxane-based regimen. In dose escalation, five objective responses were observed. A preplanned futility analysis in dose expansion showed a 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.4-11.2) objective response rate with a median progression-free survival of 2 months (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.8) across all four cohorts, leading to study termination. Pharmacodynamic analysis of tissue and plasma showed GR pathway downregulation in most patients in cycle 1., Conclusions: ORIC-101 with nab-paclitaxel showed limited clinical activity in taxane-resistant solid tumors. Despite clear inhibition of GR pathway signaling, the insufficient clinical signal underscores the challenges of targeting a single resistance pathway when multiple mechanisms of resistance may be in play., Significance: Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) upregulation is a mechanism of resistance to taxane chemotherapy in preclinical cancer models. ORIC-101 is a small molecule GR inhibitor. In this phase 1 study, ORIC-101 plus nab-paclitaxel did not show meaningful clinical benefit in patients who previously progressed on taxanes despite successful GR pathway downregulation., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The use of albumin resuscitation in septic shock is only recommended in patients who have received large volumes of crystalloid resuscitation regardless of serum albumin concentration. The role of albumin is still largely debated and evidence to support its use still lacking., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether albumin replacement increases the number of vasopressor-free days in patients with septic shock and hypoalbuminemia., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the effect of albumin replacement in septic shock. Hypoalbuminemic patients with septic shock who received albumin were retrospectively compared with a cohort who did not. The primary outcome was number of vasopressor-free days at day 14 from shock presentation, which was analyzed using an adjusted linear regression model to adjust for confounders., Results: There was no difference in vasopressor-free days at day 14 in patients who received albumin versus those who did not, after adjusting for confounders of exposure (0.50, 95% CI = -0.97 to 1.97; P = 0.502). There also was no difference in secondary outcomes except for need for invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), which was significantly lower in patients who received albumin (61 [54.4%] vs 88 [67.7%]; P = 0.035)., Conclusions and Relevance: We observed no difference in vasopressor-free days at day 14 in patients with hypoalbuminemia who received albumin compared with those who did not. However, patients who received albumin required significantly less MV although further studies are warranted to assess this effect., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare disease responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) therapy in paediatric TSS could improve shock and organ failure, but more consistent efficacy and safety data are needed. Our objective was to determine whether a randomised clinical trial (RCT) assessing intravenous IG in TSS in children is feasible., Methods: We performed a multicentre, feasibility, double-blind RCT assessing efficacy of high-dose intravenous IG versus albumin 4% (control group) within the first 12 hours of shock onset. Included patients were aged above 1 month and below 18 years with suspected TSS and septic shock. Feasibility was assessed by measuring inclusion rate, protocol compliance and missing data regarding death and the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) Score. Other secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated during hospital stay, at 60 day and 1 year., Results: 28 patients, admitted in 6 paediatric intensive care units during 36 consecutive months and followed for 1 year, received the allocated treatment: 13 in intravenous IG group, 15 in control group. The median age was 10.6 years and the sex ratio was 1. Inclusion rate was above 50%, protocol deviations were below 30% and missing data regarding death and PELOD-2 Score below 10%. No difference concerning secondary clinical outcomes between groups was observed, and more adverse events were reported in the control group., Conclusion: It seems to be feasible to conduct an RCT assessing intravenous IG efficacy and safety in paediatric TSS but must be realised internationally, with choice of a clinically relevant endpoint and a specific design in order to be realistic., Trial Registration Number: NCT02219165., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

A 73-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma was administered carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab for four cycles. Subsequently, he presented with multiple purpuras on his extremities, joint swelling on his fingers, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, accompanied by acute kidney injury (AKI), increased proteinuria, hematuria, and elevated C-reactive protein levels. Skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis as well as IgA and C3 deposition in the vessel walls. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with IgA vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) induced by carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab. After discontinuation of pembrolizumab and glucocorticoids, the symptoms immediately resolved. Regular monitoring of skin, blood tests, and urinalysis are necessary, and the possibility of irAE IgA vasculitis should be considered in cases of purpura and AKI during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors., Competing Interests: AM has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Nippon Kayaku, Merck, Kyowa Kirin, and Pfizer. KK has received honoraria Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. MS has received grants and contracts from any entity from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Kayaku, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin; honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD K.K, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nippon Kayaku, Daiichi-Sankyo Company, Merck Biopharma, and Amgen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Terashima, Matsumoto, Ozaki, Nakagawa, Nakagome, Terasaki, Iida, Mitsugi, Kuramochi, Okada, Inoue, Matsuki, Kitagawa, Fukuizumi, Onda, Takeuchi, Miyanaga, Kasahara and Seike.)

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options., Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs., Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m 2 , day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m 2 , twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety., Results: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented., Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Albumin is commonly used for various indications; however, there is conflicting data regarding its appropriate use in different clinical cases. This study aimed to determine the pattern and appropriateness of albumin use among cancer patients at the King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult cancer patients who were prescribed albumin between January 2019 and July 2020 in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Data collected included demographics, prescribing services, indications and dosing regimens. A literature review was performed using PubMed to assess the appropriateness of albumin indications and dosing regimens against current guidelines, drug information resources and the package insert., Results: Albumin was prescribed to 1,361 patients during the study period. Each patient received an average of 74.4 ± 89 g of albumin for an average of 2.6 ± 1.8 days. Albumin use was deemed appropriate in 69% of the patients. The critical care service accounted for the highest albumin consumption, with 37% of prescriptions for septic shock. Inappropriate use of albumin was most prevalent in the medical solid tumour services (40.8% of prescriptions), primarily for edema (28%)., Conclusion: To the best of the author's knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate albumin use in a large cohort of oncology patients. Approximately one-third of the albumin prescriptions were considered inappropriate. Continuous education on appropriate usage and regular evaluations of guideline adherence are essential to ensure proper utilisation of albumin in cancer care., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© Copyright 2024, Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, All Rights Reserved.)

Introduction: Relacorilant (CORT125134, Corcept Therapeutics) is a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, which reverses the glucocorticoid-mediated anti-apoptotic effects and restores the taxane chemosensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Given those preclinical findings, relacorilant is currently under investigation in clinical trials in combination with nab-paclitaxel for the platinum-resistant ovarian cancer setting., Areas Covered: Already published preclinical and clinical evidence of relacorilant antitumor activity was analyzed and discussed. Ongoing clinical trials registered on clincaltrials.gov were also reported. The review aimed to summarize the status of relacorilant, the mechanism of action, the published and ongoing trials, and its safety and efficacy., Expert Opinion: Relacorilant combined with nab-paclitaxel, may represent a promising strategy for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. After preliminary positive results in terms of clinical efficacy, a randomized phase III trial is ongoing to confirm the findings from the published phase II study.

Introduction: The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is still poor, and new strategies improving patients' outcome are needed. In our trial we investigated safety and activity of nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line systemic treatment for patients with advanced BTC., Methods: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, dose-escalation, single-arm phase I/II trial, patients were accrued into cohorts of 3 patients and dose escalation was performed following the standard 3 + 3 rule. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free from progression at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability of the combination; progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); objective response rate (ORR); duration of response., Results: Between July 2017 and December 2020, 67 patients were treated. Among the 10 patients in the phase I, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and dose level 2 was defined as recommended phase II dose for the phase II part. At data cutoff, the 6-month PFS rate was 49.1 % (95 % CI 40.8-57.5 %) with 28 patients out of 57 free from progression or death at 6 months. Median PFS was 6.3 months (95 % CI 3.6-10.1) and median OS was 12.4 months (95 % CI 8-23). ORR was 20.89 %. Most common grade 3 and grade 1-2 drug-related adverse events were neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, respectively., Conclusion: Triple chemotherapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile. However, the study did not meet its primary endpoint. Future studies will clarify the benefit of chemotherapy combinations in different settings. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03943043., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: TP reports consulting fees from Bayer, Ipsen and AstraZeneca; institutional research funding from Roche, Bayer, Astra Zeneca; travel expenses from Roche. RB reports lecture fees from AstraZeneca; travel expenses from Roche. MM reports Personal Honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Ipsen, Hippocrates Research, Viatris, Servier; Consulting or Advisory role from AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Janssen Oncology; Steering Committee, Data Monitoring Committee from Novartis, OncoSil; Institutional Research Funding from Roche. FB received personal honoraria as invited speaker from Eli-Lilly, MSD, EISAI, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre; participation in advisory board for Servier, AAA Novartis. DF reports lecture fees from MSD. HSP reports Advisory board Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myer Squibb, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Astrazeneca, Eli-lilly, Sanofi. CS reports Consulting or advisory role for MSD, Eisai; Speakers’ Bureau for Roche, MSD. AZ reports speaker bureau for Merck serono, Amgen, Servier, Sanofi, MSD. LR reports consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Elevar Therapeutics, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, Taiho Oncology, Zymeworks; lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Incyte, Ipsen, Roche, Servier; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; Institutional research funding from Agios, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, TransThera Sciences, Zymeworks. AS is on advisory board of BMS (Bristol-Myers-Squibb), Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme); declares consulting fees from Sanofi, Incyte; speaker bureau for Takeda, BMS, Roche, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Servier, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, Sandoz, Eisai, Novartis, Bayer, MSD, BeiGene. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Albumin is used commonly across a wide range of clinical settings to improve hemodynamics, to facilitate fluid removal, and to manage complications of cirrhosis. The International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines developed guidelines for the use of albumin in patients requiring critical care, undergoing cardiovascular surgery, undergoing kidney replacement therapy, or experiencing complications of cirrhosis., Study Design and Methods: Cochairs oversaw the guideline development process and the panel included researchers, clinicians, methodologists, and a patient representative. The evidence informing this guideline arises from a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews, in which multiple databases were searched (inception through November 23, 2022). The panel reviewed the data and formulated the guideline recommendations using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The guidelines were revised after public consultation., Results: The panel made 14 recommendations on albumin use in adult critical care (three recommendations), pediatric critical care (one recommendation), neonatal critical care (two recommendations), cardiovascular surgery (two recommendations), kidney replacement therapy (one recommendation), and complications of cirrhosis (five recommendations). Of the 14 recommendations, two recommendations had moderate certainty of evidence, five recommendations had low certainty of evidence, and seven recommendations had very low certainty of evidence. Two of the 14 recommendations suggested conditional use of albumin for patients with cirrhosis undergoing large-volume paracentesis or with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Twelve of 14 recommendations did not suggest albumin use in a wide variety of clinical situations where albumin commonly is transfused., Interpretation: Currently, few evidence-based indications support the routine use of albumin in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. These guidelines provide clinicians with actionable recommendations on the use of albumin., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: J. C. receives research support from Canadian Blood Services and Octapharma and serves on the board of directors of the Canadian Hematology Society. N. J. S. is a director of the National Board of Echocardiography and receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer. A. B. is an employee of Canadian Blood Services. H. K. is an employee of Canadian Blood Services. E. G. C. receives research funding (related to albumin) from Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization, Kidney Foundation of Canada, and Physician Services Incorporated Foundation; is an editorial board member of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease; and is a member of the Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury guideline panel for the Canadian Association of Radiologists. B. R. is a guideline methodologist for American Thoracic Society, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Canadian Blood Services; is the Knowledge Translation director for Canadian Critical Care Society; is the grants and manuscripts chair for Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and in a guideline group member for multiple guidelines. S. R. B. is the chair of the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology section for the Society of Critical Care Medicine (not albumin use related), is a paid consultant for Wolters Kluwer (Lexicomp), is a Society of Critical Care Medicine Social Media Committee member, is a Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Committee member, and has received a research grant from the National Institute of General Medicine Sciences. L. C. is a guideline group member for the British Society of Gastroenterology (management of ascites in liver cirrhosis), is involved in peer-reviewed publications (multiple topics including relevant to albumin use), received lecturer honoraria for the Canadian Liver Conference 2022, is a hepatology consultant for the Royal Free Hospital London, and is a Liver Committee member of the British Society of Gastroenterology. M. F. receives consultant fees from Cerus Corporation and Biocogniv, Inc.; has received honoraria from Grifols (none were albumin related); is a board member for Project Santa Fe Foundation and the American Board of Pathology; is the Histocompatibility and Identity Testing Committee Chair for College of American Pathologists; is co-team leader for the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST)Collaborative; and is the Editorial Committee co-chair for the ICTMG. R. J. has received fellowship funding from Canadian Blood Services, is an employee of William Osler Health System and the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, and is a panel member for ICTMG Platelet Utilization guideline development group. K. P. serves on the board of directors in North America for International Society for Blood Transfusion (ISBT), is a 2023 Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) Red Blood Cells (RBC) guideline panel member, and is a member of the National Advisory Committee of Blood and Blood Products. P. S. S. is director of the Canadian Neonatal Network, director of the Canadian Preterm Birth Network, director of the International Network to Evaluate Outcomes of Neonates, and an external advisory board member for the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance system (none related to albumin manufacturers). H. S. is a consultant for Terumo and Cerus (not albumin related). Z. M. S. is a consultant and advisory board member of Grifols, Fresenius Kabi, and Novartis; receives research funding from Erydel and Fresenius Kabi; serves on the board of directors for the BEST Collaborative and International Council for Commonality in Blood Banking Automation (ICCBBA), Inc.; is the AABB Committee Chair; is vice chair, treasurer, and committee chair for ICCBBA, Inc.; is treasurer for BEST Collaborative; and has a family member (child) who is a summer intern with Grifols, Inc. T. T. is a paid consultant for Inter-View Partners France, A+A, Bayer HealthCare SAS, BVA, Axess Research, and All Global; has received honoraria from AbbeVie, Gilead Sciences, Advanz Pharma France, and Ipsen Pharma; in the principal investigator of randomized controlled trial Albumin Administration in Cirrhotic Patients With Bacterial Infection and a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Unrelated to Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (ALB-CIRINF) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT01359813) published in 2015; and is a member of the Liver Cirrhosis-related Complications (LCC)-International Special Interest Group. B. W. is a resident physician at Loma Linda University Medical Center. S. S. is chair of the ICTMG and is an employee of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), a blood service operator in England. However, NHSBT is not a manufacturer of the intervention. N. S. is an employee of Canadian Blood Services; receives research funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Transfusion Requirements in Younger Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery [TRICS-IV] RBC transfusion in young cardiac patients; not related to albumin); is an advisory board member for Fresenius Kabius and Janssen; has received honoraria from the International Financial Corporation of the World Bank, Canadian Blood Services, and Ferring; and serves on the PKD guideline panel and ICTMG guideline panels (Fetal Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia [FNAIT], Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn [HDN], platelet transfusion, RBC specifications). None declared (D. F., S. A., M. N., C. P., S. R.). See Appendix 8 for the ICTMG Conflict of Interest Policy., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Nowadays, it is largely accepted that albumin should not be used in hypoalbuminemia or for nutritional purpose. The most discussed indication of albumin at present is the resuscitation in shock states, especially distributive shocks such as septic shock. The main evidence-based indication is also liver disease. In this review, we provided updated evidence-based instruction for definite and potential indications of albumin administration in clinical practice, with appropriate dosing and duration., Methods: Data collection was carried out until November 2023 by search of electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. GRADE system has been used to determine the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for each albumin indication., Results: A total of 165 relevant studies were included in this review. Fluid replacement in plasmapheresis and liver diseases, including hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and large-volume paracentesis, have a moderate to high quality of evidence and a strong recommendation for administering albumin. Moreover, albumin is used as a second-line and adjunctive to crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in hypovolemic shock, sepsis and septic shock, severe burns, toxic epidermal necrolysis, intradialytic hypotension, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, major surgery, non-traumatic brain injury, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and severe and refractory edema with hypoalbuminemia has a low to moderate quality of evidence and weak recommendation to use. Also, in modest volume paracentesis, severe hyponatremia in cirrhosis has a low to moderate quality of evidence and a weak recommendation., Conclusion: Albumin administration is most indicated in management of cirrhosis complications. Fluid resuscitation or treatment of severe and refractory edema, especially in patients with hypoalbuminemia and not responding to other treatments, is another rational use for albumin. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in hospitals can be an effective measure to reduce inappropriate uses of albumin., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)