Search

In the Video S1, a modified technique for submandibular gland resection in benign disease is shown. The main plane of dissection is below the fascia and immediately superficial to the fibrous capsule of the gland. The video shows the surgical steps and the structures that become evident along the procedure and illustrates some tips and tricks. Facial vessels are dissected, easily spared, and not ligated as it occurs in the classical technique. This technical variant is minimally invasive, respectful of anatomy, and through preservation of the fascial layer investing the gland aims at reducing the risk of injury to the marginalis mandibulae branch of the facial nerve, which lies within the fascia itself.

Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty (SRP) are often not clearly demonstrated. There is still an open topic in the literature about analysis of aesthetic, functional results and patients’ satisfaction after SRP. The aim of our study is to determine patients’ satisfaction after SRP and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate (RF) regarding nose appearance and improvement of symptoms, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). ROE questionnaire and the NOSE scale were used for a retrospective evaluation to assess patient’s satisfaction in 369 patients undergoing SRP surgery from 2003 to 2016. Two additional questions were asked to confirm satisfaction following surgery. 258 patients completed the questionnaires (71.7%). The global average ROE score was 18.14 (75.6%). The percentage of satisfaction of aesthetic result was 87.3%, in particular 10.5% were very happy, 57% very much satisfied and 19.8% moderately satisfied. The global post-operative average NOSE score was 13.1 with the resolution of nasal obstruction in 72.1% cases and a marked improvement in 9.3%. The results of the two additional questions showed that 81% of patients would undergo the procedure again if required and 72.1% of patients were globally satisfied. Our study demonstrates the utility of PROMs in evaluating aesthetic and functional results after SRP and simultaneous RF. In our series, the patients undergoing SRP and RF are generally satisfied by the functional and aesthetic results. This kind of assessments should be the most common post-operative evaluation methods in this surgery.

Objectives/Hypothesis Squamous cell carcinoma arising from the nasal vestibule is a rare condition accounting for about 1% of head and neck malignancies with several peculiarities concerning both staging and treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological and functional results of two different treatment modalities for the primary site: surgery and brachytherapy. Study Design A case series with the comparison of two different treatment modalities. Methods We evaluate clinical and survival data of 12 untreated patients, enrolled by a multidisciplinary tumor board, comparing oncological, functional, and esthetic results after surgery or after interstitial brachytherapy as exclusive treatments for the primary site. The functional and esthetic outcome was subjectively rated by the patients using a five-point scale. Results Locoregional control and survival are not significantly different between patients primarily treated by surgery and by brachytherapy. The functional and esthetic outcome, as assessed by the degree of satisfaction of the patients, is significantly better after primary brachytherapy than after primary surgery (P = .014). Conclusions In our experience brachytherapy, accomplished in close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists, achieves oncological results that are not different from surgery, but with a higher degree of patient satisfaction, mainly due to the esthetic outcome. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 2015

In this paper, we try to briefly review the most recent knowledge on head and neck cancer, and especially multistep laryngeal carcinogenesis, and to simply explain how this has modified our understanding of field cancerisation phenomenon. Experimental studies, made possible by the recent evolution of microdissection systems, have demonstrated that the `spatial progression' of the histopathological phenotype in the surroundings of malignant or premalignant head and neck lesions correlates with molecular progression. Such a `spatial progression' can be hypothesised to reflect temporal progression. The field cancerisation process has been divided into three phases, each with its own histological and molecular characteristics. Each of these phases may have clinical implications: detection and monitoring of fields may help cancer prevention (molecular epidemiology), early detection of recurrence (or, more exactly, of second field tumours (SFTs)) (molecular diagnostics) and prognostic prediction after treatment. This model appears plausible, especially in explaining the development of multiple primary tumours (MPTs) in adjacent head and neck mucosal regions, with peculiar clinical and prognostic implications: These tumours can be defined as multiple field tumours (SFTs). However, the model, in our opinion, does not convincingly explain the development of second primary tumours (SPTs) at more distant sites, such as the lung, colon and prostate.