Search

Total ear reconstruction describes surgical approaches aimed toward restoring the external ear to correct acquired or congenital deformities. Frameworks for auricular reconstruction have undergone substantial evolution over the past century and are broadly categorized as either autologous or alloplastic in nature. Recently, advances in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and materials science have opened new avenues for recreating the cartilaginous and soft tissue structures of the ear through development of cutting-edge 3D constructs derived from a patient's own cells in a process known as bioprinting. This review outlines the historical approaches to frameworks for ear reconstruction and provides an updated synopsis and appraisal of current bioprinting efforts.

Autologous cranioplasty (CP) following decompressive craniectomy (DC) carries a risk of bone flap resorption (BFR). The current literature offers limited information regarding the natural progression of BFR and the rate at which it occurs. We aim to characterize the progression of BFR over time and elucidate risk factors for accelerated BFR.A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent DC and autologous CP. Serial computed tomography (CT) images were used to quantify the degree of BFR over time. Risk factors included age, diabetes, smoking status, flap fragmentation, defect size, and DC-CP time interval. χOverall, 82% of patients demonstrated evidence of clinically relevant resorption on CT. On average, the bone flap decreased in volume by 36.7% within the first year, with a linear loss in volume after multiple years of follow-up. Individuals who developed greater BFR were significantly younger (43 ± 17 vs. 56 ± 12, P = 0.022), had a lower incidence of diabetes (5.9% vs. 43%, P = 0.037), and had more bone flap fragments (1.4 ± 0.67 vs. 1.00 ± 0, P 0.001) than those who did not.Resorption following CP with cryopreserved bone appears to progress in a fairly linear and continuous fashion over time. Using serial CT images, we found a resorption rate of 82% at our institution. We identified several possible risk factors for resorption, including flap fragmentation, younger age, and absence of diabetes.

Early in 2020, the pandemic resulted in an enormous demand for personal protective equipment (PPE), which consists of face masks, face shields, respirators, and gowns. At our institution, at the request of hospital administration, the Lifespan 3D Printing Laboratory spearheaded an initiative to produce reusable N95 masks for use in the hospital setting. Through this article, we seek to detail our experience designing and 3D printing an N95 mask, highlighting the most important lessons learned throughout the process. Foremost among these, we were successful in producing a non-commercial N95 alternative mask which could be used in an era when N95 materials were extremely limited in supply. We identified five key lessons related to design software, 3D printed material airtightness, breathability and humidity dispersal, and ability for communication. By sharing our experience and the most valuable lessons we learned through this process, we hope to provide a helpful foundation for future 3D-printed N95 endeavors.

This article provides highlights of the general process and workflow of creating a 3D-printed model from a medical image and discusses the applications of additively manufactured materials. It provides a brief background on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classification and regulation of medical devices, with an emphasis on 3D-printed devices. Then, the article discusses two broad applications of 3D printing in craniofacial surgery: surgery and education. Next, it discusses, with respect to surgical applications, preoperative planning, use in the operating room, surgical guides, and implants. The article includes sections on education that focus on the use of 3D-printed surgical simulators and other tools to teach medical students and residents. It briefly touches on the FDA regulations associated with the respective application of 3D printing in medicine. Lastly, the article briefly discusses the state of medical billing and reimbursement for this service.

Spontaneous reossification following a cranial defect is described by only a few case reports. A 6-month-old male with epidural hematoma underwent decompressive craniotomy, subsequently complicated by scalp abscess requiring removal of the bone flap. On serial outpatient follow-up, the patient demonstrated near-complete resolution of cranial defect over the course of 18 months, thus deferring the need for future cranioplasty. Prior articles have identified this occurrence in children and young adults; however, the present case is the first to report of this phenomenon in an infant less than 1 year of age. A brief review of the literature is provided with the proposed physiologic underpinning for the spontaneous reossification observed. While prior studies propose that recranialization is mediated by contact with the dura mater and pericranium, new investigations suggest that calvarial bone repair is also mediated by stem cells from the suture mesenchyme.

Rubber bullets have long been known to cause, on rare occasions, traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, neurosurgical literature on this occurrence is limited, and no focused review of this injury pattern has been conducted. The authors present the case of a 28-year-old male struck by a rubber bullet in the left periorbital region, causing TBI in addition to complete left visual loss and complex facial fractures. After developing a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, the patient was taken to the operating room for combined neurosurgical-craniofacial intervention. Utilizing frameless intraoperative computation tomography navigation assistance, a successful repair was made of both the patient's CSF leak and complex craniofacial injuries. TBI due to a rubber bullet is a rare but severe occurrence. Unfortunately, much of the limited literature on this topic is bereft of demographic, clinical course, injury pattern, and imaging data. Presented here is the first operative case report of TBI due to a rubber bullet. Volume rendered imaging is provided to demonstrate the extent of trauma incurred. Additionally, a methodology for frameless intraoperative computation tomography navigation assistance is shared for consideration, as it served as a helpful adjunct for a combined intracranial-craniofacial surgical repair. The experience of treating the patient's traumatic CSF leak in the context of severe craniofacial and ophthalmologic injuries highlights the need for a multidisciplinary surgical approach that may arise when treating patients with TBI due to a rubber bullet.

Sagittal craniosynostosis results in scaphocephaly from abnormal fusion of the sagittal suture. Traditionally, craniosynostosis presents at birth and is diagnosed within the first year of life. The authors report a patient with development of sagittal craniosynostosis after birth, which we term postnatal sagittal craniosynostosis. This is a rare occurrence in which management considerations are critical but are not well discussed. A 3-year-old boy presented with concerns of a metopic ridge. Workup revealed metopic ridging and an open sagittal suture. The patient later developed signs of increased intracranial pressure and repeat computed tomography scan 14 months later identified a newly fused sagittal suture. The patient underwent open posterior cranial vault expansion, resulting in resolution of symptoms. Postnatal sagittal craniosynostosis is a rare condition and should be considered in otherwise unexplained increases in increased intracranial pressure among pediatric patients. Open posterior cranial vault expansion represents a safe and effective method to treat this condition.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common procedure used for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. Once brain swelling has subsided, a cranioplasty is performed to restore cosmesis and protection to the brain. While using the patient's autologous bone flap is often the first choice in cranioplasty, this procedure is frequently complicated by bone flap resorption and infection. This study seeks to identify predictors of autologous cranioplasty failure.A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and autologous cranioplasty. Patient demographics and factors related to both surgeries and failure rates were recorded from patient records. Logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors were implicated in autologous cranioplasty failure.In our cohort, 127 patients underwent autologous cranioplasty. Overall, 18 (14.2%) patients experienced autologous cranioplasty failure. Regression analysis identified development of post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) following DC (OR: 3.26,Autologous cranioplasty is a reasonably successful procedure with a flap failure rate of 14.2%. We identified PTH, persistent neurological deficits, and reoperation prior to cranioplasty as significant predictors of autologous cranioplasty failure. Interestingly, the presence of VP shunt did not impact the odds of flap failure.

Preoperative surgical risk assessment is a major component of clinical decision making. The ability to provide accurate, individualized risk estimates has become critical because of growing emphasis on quality metrics benchmarks. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) was designed to quantify patient-specific risk across various surgeries. Its applicability to plastic surgery is unclear, however, with multiple studies reporting inaccuracies among certain patient populations. This study uses meta-analysis to evaluate the NSQIP SRC's ability to predict complications among patients having plastic surgery.OVID MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for all studies evaluating the predictive accuracy of the NSQIP SRC in plastic surgery, including oncologic reconstruction, ventral hernia repair, and body contouring. Only studies directly comparing SCR predicted to observed complication rates were included. The primary measure of SRC prediction accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), was assessed for each complication via DerSimonian and Laird random-effects analytic model. The I2 statistic, indicating heterogeneity, was judged low (I250%) or borderline/unacceptably high (I250%). All analyses were conducted in StataSE 16.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex).Ten of the 296 studies screened met criteria for inclusion (2416 patients). Studies were classified as follows: (head and neck: n = 5, breast: n = 1, extremity: n = 1), open ventral hernia repair (n = 2), and panniculectomy (n = 1). Predictive accuracy was poor for medical and surgical complications (medical: pulmonary AUC = 0.67 [0.48-0.87], cardiac AUC = 0.66 [0.20-0.99], venous thromboembolism AUC = 0.55 [0.47-0.63]), (surgical: surgical site infection AUC = 0.55 [0.46-0.63], reoperation AUC = 0.54 [0.49-0.58], serious complication AUC = 0.58 [0.43-0.73], and any complication AUC = 0.60 [0.57-0.64]). Although mortality was accurately predicted in 2 studies (AUC = 0.87 [0.54-0.99]), heterogeneity was high with I2 = 68%. Otherwise, heterogeneity was minimal (I2 = 0%) or acceptably low (I250%) for all other outcomes.The NSQIP Universal SRC, aimed at offering individualized quantifiable risk estimates for surgical complications, consistently demonstrated poor risk discrimination in this plastic surgery-focused meta-analysis. The limitations of the SRC are perhaps most pronounced where complex, multidisciplinary reconstructions are needed. Future efforts should identify targets for improving SRC reliability to better counsel patients in the perioperative setting and guide appropriate healthcare resource allocation.

Background While commonly seen in syndromic craniosynostosis, the incidence of Chiari malformation (CM) in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis has been reported at 5% and there is a lack of understanding of the pathophysiology and management of CM in this patient population. Case Description We present a 5-year-old male patient who underwent a sagittal craniosynostosis repair at the age of 5 months and returned at the age of 5 years with daily headaches associated with behavioral changes. He was found to have pan-synostoses and radiographic evidence of increased intracranial pressure, including a Chiari malformation. Neurologic and genetic workup was unremarkable. A cranial vault reconstruction was performed, and subsequent imaging demonstrated resolution of previously noted Chiari malformation. Conclusions In our case, we provided a unique window into the underlying pathophysiology for CM in patients with concurrent nonsyndromic craniosynostosis that we hope will add to the current foundation of literature supporting the intricate relation between cranial vault compliance and Chiari malformation or hindbrain herniation. Furthermore, we provide insight into the management of acquired CM and support isolated cranial vault reconstruction in those who do not appear to have symptomatic suboccipital compression.

Introduction: This study compares anthropometric outcomes of 2 sagittal synostosis repair techniques: spring-assisted surgery and endoscope-assisted craniectomy with molding helmet therapy. Methods: Patients undergoing spring-assisted surgery (n = 27) or endoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet therapy (n = 40) at separate institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and 1-year postoperative computed tomography (CT) or laser scans were analyzed for traditional cranial index (CI), adjusted cranial index (aCI), and cranial vault volume (CVV). Nine patient-matched scans were analyzed for measurement consistency. Results: The spring-assisted group was older at both time points ( P < .050) and spring-assisted group CVV was larger preoperatively and postoperatively ( P < .01). However, the change in CVV did not differ between the groups ( P = .210). There was no difference in preoperative CI (helmet vs spring: 70.1 vs 71.2, P = .368) between the groups. Postoperatively, helmet group CI (77.0 vs 74.3, P = .008) was greater. The helmet group also demonstrated a greater increase in CI (6.9 vs 3.1, P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving CI of 75 or greater was not significantly different between the groups (helmet vs spring: CI, 65% vs 52%, P = .370). There was no detectable bias in CI between matched CT and laser scans. Differences were identified between scan types in aCI and CVV measurements; subsequent analyses used corrected CVV and aCI measures for laser scan measures. Conclusions: Both techniques had equivalent proportions of patients achieving normal CI, comparable effects on cranial volume, and similar operative characteristics. The study suggests that there may be greater improvement in CI in the helmet group. However, further research should be performed.

OBJECTIVEWound breakdown and infection are common postoperative complications following resection of spinal neoplasms. Accordingly, it has become common practice at some centers for plastic surgeons to assist with closure of large posterior defects after spine tumor resection. In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis that plastic surgery closure of complex spinal defects improves wound outcomes following resection of spinal neoplastic disease.METHODSElectronic medical records of consecutive patients who underwent resection of a spinal neoplasm between June 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into two subpopulations based on whether the surgical wound was closed by plastic surgery or neurosurgery. Patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected in a central database and summarized using descriptive statistics. Outcomes of interest included rates of wound complication, reoperation, and mortality. Known preoperative risk factors for wound complication in spinal oncology were identified based on literature review and grouped categorically. The presence of each category of risk factors was then compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were applied to define associations between individual risk factors and wound complications.RESULTSOne hundred six patients met inclusion criteria, including 60 wounds primarily closed by plastic surgery and 46 by neurosurgery. The plastic surgery population included more patients with systemic metastases (58% vs 37%, p = 0.029), prior radiation (53% vs 17%, p < 0.001), prior chemotherapy (37% vs 15%, p = 0.014), and sacral region tumors (25% vs 7%, p = 0.012), and more patients who underwent procedures requiring larger incisions (7.2 ± 3.6 vs 4.5 ± 2.6 levels, p < 0.001), prolonged operative time (413 ± 161 vs 301 ± 181 minutes, p = 0.001), and greater blood loss (906 ± 1106 vs 283 ± 373 ml, p < 0.001). The average number of risk factor categories present was significantly greater in the plastic surgery group (2.57 vs 1.74, p < 0.001). Despite the higher relative risk, the plastic surgery group did not experience a significantly higher rate of wound complication (28% vs 17%, p = 0.145), reoperation (17% vs 9%, p = 0.234), or all-cause mortality (30% vs 13%, p = 0.076). One patient died from wound-related complications in each group (p = 0.851). Regression analyses identified diabetes, multilevel instrumentation, and BMI as the factors associated with the greatest wound complications.CONCLUSIONSInvolving plastic surgery in the closure of spinal wounds after resection of neoplasms may ameliorate expected increases in wound complications among higher-risk patients.

BACKGROUND Medical students must be able to suture competently upon graduation. To learn suturing technique, students must have access to practice materials. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a novel suturing trainer and to evaluate its ability to provide realistic and accessible suturing practice. A cohort of senior students at one institution compared the device with standard suture-training media (porcine feet and sponges). METHODS Using 3D printing and silicone casting, a novel suturing trainer was developed and a cohort of senior medical students trialed the device in a standardised suturing workshop. Participants evaluated the novel suturing trainer, porcine feet and sponges for simulating human tissue with regard to: (i) tissue layers; (ii) tissue texture; (iii) ability to perform interrupted suturing; (iv) running subcuticular suturing; and (v) knot tying. RESULTS Compared with porcine feet and sponges, the suturing trainer had significantly higher mean scores (p

Introduction: Partial synostosis of cranial sutures has been shown to have clinical and diagnostic significance. However, there is limited published information about how suture fusion progresses over time. In this study, we evaluate patients with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis. We aim to define the incidence of partial versus complete suture fusion and whether a correlation exists between the degree of suture fusion and age. Methods: Two hundred fifty-four patients with nonsyndromic single-suture synostosis were evaluated. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were rendered in 3-dimensions, all sutures were visualized and assessed for patency or fusion, and length of fusion was measured. Findings were grouped according to suture type (sagittal, coronal, metopic, or lambdoid), the degree of fusion (full, >50%, or 360 days). Data were analyzed to correlate patient age versus the degree of suture fusion. Results: For all patients, 72% had complete and 28% had partial synostosis. Ratios of full to partial fusion for each suture type were as follows: sagittal 97:36, coronal 35:22, metopic 46:4, and lambdoid 4:10. The sagittal, coronal, and metopic groups demonstrated greater probabilities of complete suture fusion as patient age increases ( P = .021, P < .001, P = .001, respectively). This trend was also noted when all sutures were considered together by age-group ( P < .001). Conclusion: We note a partial suture fusion rate of 28.3%. Our analysis shows a correlation between the extent of suture synostosis and patient age. Finally, we demonstrate that different sutures display different patterns of partial and complete fusion.

Cranioplasty can be performed with either autologous or synthetic materials. No clear consensus has been reached regarding which material is superior and which social factors might influence the choice of treatment modality and the outcomes. We investigated the effects of race and socioeconomic status on the implant choice and outcomes.We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult cranioplasty patients from 2002 to 2017 using the National Inpatient Sample. Autologous implant use, admission costs, length of stay (LOS), and home discharge were analyzed by race, income quartile, and insurance type using multivariable regression models.A total of 105,714 admissions met the inclusion criteria. Most of the patients were women (50.3%) and White (73.7%). Black, other race, and Medicaid patients had greater odds of autologous graft usage, and patients in the 76th-100th income quartile had lower usage. Higher income patients (51th-75th and 76th-100th) had had significantly higher hospitalization costs, amounting to a $1547.2 increase, compared with the bottom quartile. The Medicaid patients had a longer LOS (odds ratio, 1.06; P = 0.008) and decreased rates of home discharge (odds ratio, 0.41; P0.001).We found increased autologous cranioplasty usage for non-White and Medicaid patients and increased use of higher cost synthetic implants for high-income patients. Non-White patients and those from higher income quartiles incurred higher admission costs. Medicaid patients had a longer LOS and decreased rates of home discharge.