Search

The purpose of this study was to estimate the relative dose potency of salbutamol Turbuhaler compared with salbutamol pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with respect to the protective effect against methacholine bronchoconstriction. Twenty-three asthmatic subjects with stable asthma participated in the study. Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 70% or more of predicted, and baseline methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1(PC20) was 4 mg/mL or less. The design was randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover and placebo controlled and was conducted over seven study days. On each study day, the subjects inhaled 50 µg or 100 µg of salbutamol via Turbuhaler, 100 µg, 200 µg, 400 µg or 800 µg of salbutamol via pMDI, or placebo in randomized order. PC20was determined 30 mins after inhalation. Increasing doses of salbutamol pMDI increased the PC20in a dose-dependent fashion from 3.9 mg/mL after placebo to 13.3 mg/mL after pMDI 100 µg, 19.0 mg/mL after 200 µg, 32.6 mg/mL after 400 µg, and 35.1 mg/mL after 800 µg. The half-maximum response dose for pMDI (ED50) was 104 µg. Salbutamol Turbuhaler 50 µg increased the PC20to 10.0 mg/mL and 100 µg to 12.6 mg/mL. Salbutamol pMDI 200 µg provided significantly greater protection to methacholine than pMDI 100 µg or Turbuhaler 100 µg and significantly less protection than pMDI 400 µg (P

Sputum examination is a useful noninvasive method to study airway inflammation. We investigated the reproducibility and validity of the measurements of lymphocyte subsets in the sputum of 11 stable patients with asthma and 10 nonasthmatic smokers. Sputum was dispersed with 0.1% dithiothreitol. A differential cell count was made with Wright's stain. Aliquots were stained with antibodies to CD19 (B cells), CD3 (T cells), CD4 (helper), CD8 (suppressor), and the activation marker CD25 (IL2 receptor) on T-cell subsets and were assayed by flow cytometry. Sputum from patients with asthma compared with nonasthmatic subjects had more eosinophils (mean +/- SEM, 32.5 +/- 8.5 versus 1.3 +/- 0.5%, p0.01) and a higher proportion of lymphocytes that were B cells (16.2 +/- 3.2 versus 4.0 +/- 1.0%, p0.01), and these correlated closely with the eosinophils (r = 0.8, p0.01). Patients with asthma also had more activated T-helper cells (39.3 +/- 4.6 versus 9.0 +/- 9.0%, p = 0.05), but the comparison was limited to two smokers because of macrophage autofluorescence. The repeatability of measurements of helper T-cells (R = 0.94), suppressor T cells (R = 0.88), and activated helper T cells (R = 0.77) was good; repeatability of measurements of T and B cells could not be examined because these were reciprocals of each other. Asthmatic sputum has different lymphocyte profiles than sputum from nonasthmatic smoking control subjects. The results demonstrate a potential importance of antibody-producing lymphocytes in the airway and their relation to sputum eosinophilia in asthma.

In order to determine whether there is a relationship between acquired free protein S deficiency and increased thrombin generation, we performed a cross-sectional study of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Plasma samples were assayed for free protein S and were correlated to levels of prothrombin fragments (F1 + 2); an elevated level of F1 + 2 was used as a surrogate marker for a prothrombotic state. Assays for anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) were performed on two separate blood samples taken at least 3 months apart in order to detect the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Of the 36 subjects, 9 had reduced free protein S levels compared to 0 of 21 controls (P = 0.01) and the mean free protein S level was significantly lower in the SLE population than in controls (0.30 +/- 0.08 U/mL versus 0.43 +/- 0.10 U/mL, P0.001). Of the 24 subjects with antiphospholipid antibodies, 9 had reduced free protein S levels, compared to 0 of 12 subjects without antiphospholipid antibodies (P = .01). The mean F1 + 2 level was significantly higher in study subjects with reduced free protein S levels than in those with normal free protein S levels (1.22 +/- 0.50 nmol/L versus 0.78 +/- 0.27 nmol/L, P = 0.05). This study confirms an association between antiphospholipid antibodies and reduced free protein S levels and demonstrates that patients with SLE and acquired free protein S deficiency generate more thrombin than patients with SLE and normal free protein S levels. Further studies are needed to determine whether the thrombotic diathesis associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is directly caused by the concomitant presence of acquired free protein S deficiency.