Search

Given the limited accuracy of clinically used risk scores such as the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 system and the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease 2 risk scores, novel risk algorithms determining an individual’s susceptibility of future incident or recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk are urgently needed. Due to major improvements in assay techniques, multimarker proteomic and lipidomic panels hold the promise to be reliably assessed in a high-throughput routine. Novel machine learning-based approaches have facilitated the use of this high-dimensional data resulting from these analyses for ASCVD risk prediction. More than a dozen of large-scale retrospective studies using different sets of biomarkers and different statistical methods have consistently demonstrated the additive prognostic value of these panels over traditionally used clinical risk scores. Prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of a biomarker panel in clinical ASCVD risk stratification. When combined with the genetic predisposition captured with polygenic risk scores and the actual ASCVD phenotype observed with coronary artery imaging, proteomics and lipidomics can advance understanding of the complex multifactorial causes underlying an individual’s ASCVD risk.

Background and aims: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, is reduced by bempedoic acid. We assessed the relationship between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and hsCRP in relation to baseline statin use. Methods: Pooled data from four phase 3 trials (patients on maximally tolerated statins [Pool 1] and patients receiving no or low-dose statins [Pool 2]) were used to determine the proportion of patients with baseline hsCRP ≥2 mg/L who achieved hsCRP

Aims The 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) dyslipidaemia guidelines recommend achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholestrol (LDL-C) goals based on an individual’s risk. We aimed to evaluate the impact of guideline adoption with statin, ezetimibe, and statin plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on LDL-C goal achievement and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) across six countries. Methods and results A simulation model with a five-year horizon (2020–2024) was developed based on Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Study database with a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario representing status quo, intervention scenario-1 representing treatment with statin and ezetimibe as separate agents, and intervention scenario-2 representing treatment with statin or statin plus ezetimibe FDC. MACE was defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. The mean population LDL-C was reduced from 4.25 mmol/L in the BAU scenario, to 3.65 mmol/L and 3.59 mmol/L in intervention scenarios-1 and -2, respectively. Compared with BAU, intervention scenarios-1 and-2 resulted in relative reduction of MACE by 5.4% and 6.4% representing ∼3.7 and 4.4 million MACE averted, respectively, across six countries over 5 years. The absolute benefit in terms of MACE averted was highest for China, whereas France had highest relative reduction in MACE with both intervention scenarios compared with BAU. Conclusion The 2019 ESC/EAS guideline-based treatment intensification with strategies based on statin, ezetimibe, and statin plus ezetimibe FDC is estimated to result in a substantial population-level benefit in terms of MACE averted compared with BAU.

Here, we review the highlights of cardiovascular basic science published in 2021 and early 2022 on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology Council for Basic Cardiovascular Science. We begin with non-coding RNAs which have emerged as central regulators cardiovascular biology, and then discuss how technological developments in single-cell ‘omics are providing new insights into cardiovascular development, inflammation, and disease. We also review recent discoveries on the biology of extracellular vesicles in driving either protective or pathogenic responses. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2021 recognized the importance of the molecular basis of mechanosensing and here we review breakthroughs in cardiovascular sensing of mechanical force. We also summarize discoveries in the field of atherosclerosis including the role of clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, and new mechanisms of crosstalk between hyperglycaemia, lipid mediators, and inflammation. The past 12 months also witnessed major advances in the field of cardiac arrhythmia including new mechanisms of fibrillation. We also focus on inducible pluripotent stem cell technology which has demonstrated disease causality for several genetic polymorphisms in long-QT syndrome and aortic valve disease, paving the way for personalized medicine approaches. Finally, the cardiovascular community has continued to better understand COVID-19 with significant advancement in our knowledge of cardiovascular tropism, molecular markers, the mechanism of vaccine-induced thrombotic complications and new anti-viral therapies that protect the cardiovascular system.

This 2023 statement updates clinical guidance for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH), explains the genetic complexity, and provides pragmatic recommendations to address inequities in HoFH care worldwide. Key strengths include updated criteria for the clinical diagnosis of HoFH and the recommendation to prioritize phenotypic features over genotype. Thus, a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >10 mmol/L (>400 mg/dL) is suggestive of HoFH and warrants further evaluation. The statement also provides state-of-the art discussion and guidance to clinicians for interpreting the results of genetic testing and for family planning and pregnancy. Therapeutic decisions are based on the LDL-C level. Combination LDL-C-lowering therapy—both pharmacologic intervention and lipoprotein apheresis (LA)—is foundational. Addition of novel, efficacious therapies (i.e. inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, followed by evinacumab and/or lomitapide) offers potential to attain LDL-C goal or reduce the need for LA. To improve HoFH care around the world, the statement recommends the creation of national screening programmes, education to improve awareness, and management guidelines that account for the local realities of care, including access to specialist centres, treatments, and cost. This updated statement provides guidance that is crucial to early diagnosis, better care, and improved cardiovascular health for patients with HoFH worldwide.

Background: Inherited predisposition to atherosclerosis leads to higher risk for developing coronary heart disease (CHD). There are mainly two ways to conceptualize inherited risk of CHD: family history and polygenic predisposition. We aimed at assessing the impact of family history of CHD and genetic predisposition in predicting the individual lifetime risk of major coronary events (MCE). Methods: Using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, we estimated the lifetime risk of MCE associated with parental family history of CHD and individual genetic predisposition (estimated by a polygenic risk score including 350 variants). Results: A total of 445,744 UK-Biobank participants were included in the study (mean age 57 years; 54.3% females). Having one parent with a history of CHD increased the lifetime risk of MCE by 75% (HR 1.75, 95%CI 1.70-1.82). Having both parents with a history of CHD further increased the risk (HR 2.78, 95%CI 2.64-2.92) Similarly, a dose-dependent step-wise increase in MCE risk was observed moving from the lowest to the highest decile of the polygenic score. Compared to subjects without family history of CHD and with average level of the polygenic score, having a parental history of CHD determined an increase in lifetime risk of MCE (HR 1.90, 95%CI 1.82-1.98) comparable to belonging to the highest decile of the polygenic score (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.76-2.02). However, if subjects present both parents with family history of CHD and a very high polygenic predisposition, the risk was even higher (HR 3.54, 95%CI 3.34-3.75), suggesting an additive contribution to the characterization of the lifetime risk. Conclusions: We described the addictive impact of family history of CHD and individual polygenic predisposition in predicting lifetime risk of MCE. In order to identify subjects at higher risk of having an early event, it is essential to retrieve information about both these hereditary components.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. HDAC3 regulates adipose tissue physiology (WAT), and its genetic inactivation causes metabolic reprogramming of white adipocytes toward browning. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of HDAC3 silencing at different stages of differentiation and investigate the influence of adipocyte metabolism on the immunophenotype of WAT. Materials and Methods: Following HDAC3 silencing in mesenchymal stem cells and mature adipocytes, adipocyte function, RNA, DNA and protein levels, and proliferation at the end of differentiation were analyzed. Visceral WAT immunophenotype (vWAT) of Hdac3 KO mice in WAT (Hdac3fatKO) and controls (FL) was performed by FACS. Results: Silencing HDAC3 in precursors amplifies the expression of genes and proteins that regulate differentiation, oxidative metabolism, browning and mitochondrial activity. Following silencing, we found increased 1)phosphorylation of AKT (1.64 fold change, P

No abstract available

Extracellular ATP (eATP) is a signaling molecule that variably affects all cells of the immune system either directly or after hydrolysis to adenosine. Although eATP is virtually absent in the interstitium of normal tissues, it can be present in the hundreds of micromolar range in tumors, a concentration compatible with activation of the ATP-gated ionotropic P2X7 receptor. Here, we show that P2X7 activity in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) induces cellular senescence and limits tumor suppression. P2X7 stimulation affected cell cycling of effector T cells and resulted in generation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and p38 MAPK-dependent upregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (Cdkn1a, encoding for p21Waf1/Cip1). Lack of P2X7 promoted a transcriptional signature that correlated with enhanced cytotoxic T-cell response in human solid tumors. In mice, transfer of tumor-specific T cells with deletion of P2rx7 significantly reduced tumor growth and extended survival. Collectively, these findings uncover a purinergic checkpoint that can be targeted to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy strategies.Significance:These findings suggest that the purinergic checkpoint P2X7 may be targeted to enhance T-cell–mediated cancer immunotherapy and improve T effector cell accumulation in the tumor microenvironment.

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary Table 3

Supplementary Materials and Methods

Supplementary Table 1

Elevated concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an inherited, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to investigate the clinical utility for patients, and the economic benefit to healthcare systems and society of measuring Lp(a) concentrations more widely today.We conducted a structured literature review to identify the economic and health benefits and costs of measuring the Lp(a) concentration, potential barriers hindering the uptake of the measure, and potential solutions to address them. These findings were then discussed in an advisory board attended by experts and patient organisations.It was found that if Lp(a) concentration is measured more widely today, patients, healthcare system and society would experience clinical and economic benefits even before specific Lp(a) lowering pharmacological treatments become available. Furthermore, a wider uptake of the Lp(a) measurement would support the development of epidemiological data.For Lp(a) measurement to be more widely used, key barriers which are hindering its uptake need to be addressed. These include i) the perception that the measure may have limited clinical value, ii) lack of awareness on Lp(a), iii) lack of data on the CV benefit of reducing Lp(a), iv) technical and clinical guidelines barriers, and v) healthcare system barriers. Scientific communities and industry should collaborate to address technical challenges and deficiencies in clinical guidelines. However, policy intervention will be crucial for national ASCVD plans to acknowledge the importance of Lp(a).

Aims Current risk scores do not accurately identify patients at highest risk of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in need of more intensive therapeutic interventions. Advances in high-throughput plasma proteomics, analysed with machine learning techniques, may offer new opportunities to further improve risk stratification in these patients. Methods and results Targeted plasma proteomics was performed in two secondary prevention cohorts: the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort (n = 870) and the Athero-Express cohort (n = 700). The primary outcome was recurrent ASCVD (acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). Machine learning techniques with extreme gradient boosting were used to construct a protein model in the derivation cohort (SMART), which was validated in the Athero-Express cohort and compared with a clinical risk model. Pathway analysis was performed to identify specific pathways in high and low C-reactive protein (CRP) patient subsets. The protein model outperformed the clinical model in both the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC): 0.810 vs. 0.750; P < 0.001] and validation cohort (AUC: 0.801 vs. 0.765; P < 0.001), provided significant net reclassification improvement (0.173 in validation cohort) and was well calibrated. In contrast to a clear interleukin-6 signal in high CRP patients, neutrophil-signalling-related proteins were associated with recurrent ASCVD in low CRP patients. Conclusion A proteome-based risk model is superior to a clinical risk model in predicting recurrent ASCVD events. Neutrophil-related pathways were found in low CRP patients, implying the presence of a residual inflammatory risk beyond traditional NLRP3 pathways. The observed net reclassification improvement illustrates the potential of proteomics when incorporated in a tailored therapeutic approach in secondary prevention patients.

The past year was an exciting time for clinical lipidology when we learnt more about existing therapies as well as therapies targeting novel pathways discovered through genetic studies. LDL cholesterol remained the main target and a variety of drugs to lower LDL cholesterol through different mechanisms were explored. Emerging evidence on the atherogenity of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins led to renewed interest in lowering them with new treatments. Lp(a) was back in focus with evidence on causality and new targeted therapeutics which dramatically lower Lp(a) levels. We will be able to personalise lipid lowering therapy further with this enriched armamentarium once we have the results of the cardiovascular outcome studies with some of these new agents.

A number of new cholesterol-lowering drugs have been recently developed and approved, enriching the pharmacological armamentarium beyond and above statins. Ezetimibe, available since two decades, and bempedoic acid, a new drug inhibiting the same biosynthetic pathway targeted by statins but at an early step, represent valuable tools for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, particularly in specific groups of patients.Bempedoic acid, either alone or in combination with ezetimibe, appears to reduce significantly LDL-C levels, an effect that has been observed also in patients with statin intolerance. A Mendelian randomization study has anticipated a protective cardiovascular effect of bempedoic acid; a randomized clinical trial is currently assessing whether the pharmacological control of hypercholesterolemia with bempedoic acid translates into a clinical benefit. Bempedoic acid, as well as ezetimibe, does not appear to induce adverse events in muscles; moreover, whereas statins are associated with a modest, although significant, increased risk of new-onset diabetes, bempedoic acid does not, at least based on the available evidence.On the basis of available data, and while awaiting the results of the outcome trial, bempedoic acid appears to represent a valuable approach for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, either alone or in combination in ezetimibe.

The recent ESC/EAS 2019 Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias are centred on the causal role of low density lipoprotein (LDL), or more generally apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, in atherosclerosis as an essential principle. Despite updated goals and recommendations, that have further highlighted the importance of a powerful reduction in LDL-C levels to reduce the individual CV risk, some challenges remain to be addressed in view of future guideline elaboration. In this review, we will summarize the new evidence from clinical trials since 2019 guideline release and discuss the possible challenges for the future.

Background and aimsSex-specific differences in the response to lipid-lowering therapies have been reported. Here, we assessed the effect of bempedoic acid in women and men using pooled, patient-level data from four phase 3 clinical trials of bempedoic acid.MethodsPatients were grouped into two pools: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) “on statins”, and “low-dose or no statin”. Percent changes from baseline to at least week 12 in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), non–high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non–HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), apolipoprotein B (Apo B), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), as well as safety, were analyzed by statin pool and sex.ResultsOverall, 3623 patients were included (bempedoic acid, 2425; placebo, 1198). Significant reductions in lipid parameters and hsCRP were observed with bempedoic acidvs. placebo in both sexes in the ASCVD and/or HeFH on statins (n = 3009) and the low-dose or no statin (n = 614) pools (p≤0.002). Compared with men, women had significantly greater placebo-corrected reductions in LDL-C (−21.2%vs. −17.4%;p=0.044), non–HDL-C (−17.3%vs. −12.1%;p=0.003), TC (−13.8%vs. −10.5%;p=0.012), and Apo B (−16.0%vs. −11.3%;p=0.004) in the ASCVD and/or HeFH on statins pool. Women had numerically greater reductions than men in lipid parameters in the low-dose or no statin pool and hsCRP in both pools. The safety of bempedoic acid was comparable between sexes.ConclusionsIn this pooled analysis, women experienced significant improvements in levels of LDL-C and other lipid parameters with bempedoic acid.

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options.

The SANTORINI study is an observational study that enrolled 9606 adult patients at high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk from 14 European countries, aiming at providing information on the management of hypercholesterolemia, in light of the new European guidelines published in 2019. The scope of the present analysis was to assess the cardiovascular risk in patients and to investigate whether the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemia are being implemented in clinical practice. Italy participated in the study with 1977 patients, of which, according to the investigators, 1531 (77.4%) were classified as very high CV risk and 446 (22.6%) as high CV risk. In 72.8% of the cases, the cardiovascular risk classification according to the most recent European ESC/EAS guidelines was applied, in 22.81% it was based on clinical experience alone, and in the remaining 4.4% on national, regional or local guidelines. Following the investigator's risk classification according to guidelines, 1144 (79.5%) patients fell into the very high cardiovascular risk and 295 (20.5%) into the high cardiovascular risk. Considering all available data, the cardiovascular risk was re-evaluated according to ESC/EAS guidelines, with 1288 (89.51%) patients being allocated to the very high-risk class and 119 (8.3%) into the high-risk class; for 32 patients (2.2%) there was no evidence to support very high-risk classification. The discrepancy shown after reassessment of patients’ risk classes highlights an underestimation of patients’ cardiovascular risk in Italian clinical practice. In fact, reclassifying the risk of the enrolled population according to guidelines shows that the percent of patients who were originally classified as very high risk rose from 79.5% to 89.5%, and those at high risk decreased from 20.5% to 8.3%. It is therefore concluded that although the investigating clinician in most cases follows the guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemia, these are not correctly applied, underestimating the cardiovascular risk of patients, especially when they belong to the highest risk classes. Considering the therapeutic goals recommended by the most recent European guidelines (LDL-C

Summary: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and

Background and aims: Clinical practice before 2019 suggests a substantial proportion of high and very high CV risk patients taking lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) would not achieve the new LDL-C goals recommended in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines (18 years of age with high and very high CV risk (as assigned by the investigators) requiring LLT, with no formal patient or comparator groups. The primary objective is to document, in the real-world setting, the effectiveness of current treatment modalities in managing plasma levels of LDL-C in high-and very high-risk patients requiring LLT. Key secondary effectiveness objectives include documenting the relationship between LLT and levels of other plasma lipids, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and overall predicted CV risk over one year. Health economics and patient-relevant parameters will also be assessed. Conclusions: The SANTORINI study, which commenced after the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were published, is ideally placed to provide important contemporary insights into the evolving management of LLT in Europe and highlight factors contributing to the low levels of LDL-C goal achievement among high and very high CV risk patients. It is hoped the findings will help enhance patient management and reduce the burden of ASCVD in Europe. ' (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Objective: In primary hypercholesterolemia many people treated with statins do not reach their plasma LDL-C goals and are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (R/E) in this population. Methods: This was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-arm study of FDC R/E in people with primary hypercholesterolemia at very high risk (VHR) or high risk (HR) of CVD, inadequately controlled with 20 mg or 10 mg stable daily dose of rosuvastatin or equipotent dose of another statin. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of FDC R/E versus rosuvastatin monotherapy uptitrated to 40 mg (R40) or 20 mg (R20) in reduction of LDL-C after 6 weeks. Results: Randomized VHR participants (n = 244) were treated with R40, R40/E10, or R20/E10; randomized HR participants (n = 208) received R10/E10 or R20. In VHR participants, superiority of R40/E10 and R20/E10 versus R40 was demonstrated on LDL-C percent change from baseline to Week 6 with least squares mean differences (LSMD) of −19.66% (95% CI: −29.48% to −9.84%; P < .001) and −12.28% (95% CI: −22.12% to −2.44%; P = .015), respectively. In HR participants, superiority of R10/E10 over R20 was not demonstrated (LSMD −5.20%; 95% CI: −15.18% to 4.78%; P = .306), despite clinically relevant LDL-C reduction with R10/E10. No unexpected safety findings were reported. Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that R/E FDCs improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in people with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statins and at VHR/HR of CVD.

Inappropriate consumption and over-prescription of antibiotics have been extensively reported. Our aim was to specifically evaluate the antibiotic prescribing patterns and appropriateness among the elderly (≥65 years) from the Lombardy region (Italy) in primary care. Antibiotic consumption (as DID: DDD/1000 inhabitants × day) and prevalence rates in 2018 were assessed, and the prescribing quality was evaluated using ESAC-based indicators and WHO-AWaRe criteria. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the probability of receiving an antibiotic prescription and patients’ and physicians’ characteristics. A total of 237,004 antibiotic users were included (mean age ± SD 75.98 ± 7.63; males 42.7%). Antibacterial consumption was equal to 17.2 DID, with values increasing with age in both males and females. The study found that the proportion of patients with at least one antibiotic prescription in 2018 was around 39.1%, with different age-related trends between males and females. Consumption (as DID) of cephalosporines (65–74 years: 1.65; 75–84 years: 2.06; ≥85 years: 2.86) and quinolones (3.88, 4.61, 4.96, respectively) increased with growing age, while consumption of penicillins (6.21, 6.08, 6.04, respectively) and macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (3.25, 2.91, 2.64, respectively) decreased. In 2018, antibiotics considered to have higher toxicity concerns or resistance potential, as reported by WHO-AWaRe tool, were consumed more intensively than those to be used as first choices, independent of age and sex. The probability of receiving an antibiotic prescription was greater in females, in subjects with polypharmacy, in treatment with respiratory drugs, anti-inflammatory agents or glucocorticoids, and with previous hospitalization; but increasing age was less associated with exposition to antibiotics.

The COVID-19 pandemic poses major challenges to healthcare systems. We aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on prescription and adherence patterns of chronic cardiovascular therapies (lipid-lowering [LL], oral antidiabetic drugs [AD], and antihypertensives [AH]) using administrative pharmaceutical databases. For each treatment, two cohorts of prevalent cases in 2019 and 2020 were compared. We evaluated the percentage change in dispensed packages and treatment adherence as a proportion of days covered (PDC). For all therapies, an increase was observed during March–April 2020 (LL: +4.52%; AD: +2.72%; AH: +1.09%), with a sharp decrease in May–June 2020 (LL: −8.40%; AD: −12.09%; AH: −10.54%) compared to 2019. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic cardiovascular treatments appears negligible on adherence: 533,414 patients showed high adherence to LL (PDC ≥ 80%) in January–February 2020, and 2.29% became poorly adherent (PDC < 20%) in the following four-month period (vs. 1.98% in 2019). A similar increase was also observed for AH (1.25% with poor adherence in 2020 vs. 0.93% in 2019). For AD, the increase was restrained (1.55% with poor adherence in 2020 vs. 1.37% in 2019). The rush to supply drugs at the beginning of lockdown preserved the continuity of chronic cardiovascular therapies.

Background: Major guidelines recommend the initiation of a beta-blocker therapy after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to map the treatment pathway of beta-blockers for AMI survivors during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and to investigate predictors for treatment non-initiation.Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy Region were investigated. Subjects aged ≥18 years who were hospitalised with AMI in the period February-March-April of 2018, 2019, and 2020 were included, and followed for 30 days from the discharge date, to investigate whether they presented a first prescription of beta-blockers. A multivariate logistic model was performed to evaluate the effect of several covariates on the probability of not receiving a post-AMI beta-blocker therapy.Results: The cohorts comprised 2259, 2383, and 1932 individuals who were hospitalised with AMI in the 3-month period in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Overall in 2020, about 58–60% of individuals with AMI received a prescription of beta-blockers within 1 month after the discharge. A continuous decreasing trend over time was observed. Men were 30% more likely to start the treatment than women, increasing age was associated with significant increasing probability of not receiving a post-infarction beta-blocker therapy, while having received an antihypertensive or lipid-lowering treatment, or having been hospitalized for heart failure prior to the AMI hospitalization reduced the likelihood of not being treated with beta-blockers.Conclusion: The initiation of beta-blocker treatment after AMI remains an under-prescribed practice, that does not seem to have been further affected by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest. METHODS: Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries. FINDINGS: Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. INTERPRETATION: At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280. FUNDING: This study is funded by 10.13039/501100022274Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Aims Many patients are unable to achieve guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, despite taking maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Bempedoic acid, a competitive inhibitor of ATP citrate lyase, significantly lowers LDL-C with or without background statin therapy in diverse populations. Because pharmacodynamic interaction between statins and bempedoic acid is complex, a dose–response model was developed to predict LDL-C pharmacodynamics following administration of statins combined with bempedoic acid. Methods and results Bempedoic acid and statin dosing and LDL-C data were pooled from 14 phase 1–3 clinical studies. Dose–response models were developed for bempedoic acid monotherapy and bempedoic acid–statin combinations using previously published statin parameters. Simulations were performed using these models to predict change in LDL-C levels following treatment with bempedoic acid combined with clinically relevant doses of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. Dose–response models predicted that combining bempedoic acid with the lowest statin dose of commonly used statins would achieve a similar degree of LDL-C lowering as quadrupling that statin dose; for example, the predicted LDL-C lowering was 54% with atorvastatin 80 mg compared with 54% with atorvastatin 20 mg + bempedoic acid 180 mg, and 42% with simvastatin 40 mg compared with 46% with simvastatin 10 mg + bempedoic acid 180 mg. Conclusion These findings suggest bempedoic acid combined with lower statin doses offers similar LDL-C lowering compared with statin monotherapy at higher doses, potentially sparing patients requiring additional lipid-lowering therapies from the adverse events associated with higher statin doses.

REDUCE-IT demonstrated that adding 4 g/day of icosapent ethyl (IPE; purified ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]) to statins substantially reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, with few adverse effects. These data prompted numerous leading medical societies across five continents, including the American College of Cardiology, the European Society of Cardiology, and the Japanese Circulation Society, to update their guidelines or scientific/consensus statements to recommend use of IPE for primary and secondary prevention of CVD events.This review discusses the incorporation of IPE into international guidelines and scientific statements, noting areas of consensus and distinction. As background, this review also describes the CVD benefits and risks of IPE as a statin adjunct, and outlines current data regarding the potential mechanisms of CVD risk reduction by EPA (as IPE) beyond triglyceride reduction.IPE is unique among 'triglyceride-lowering' treatments in having strong CVD outcomes data and, therefore, a broad international consensus among professional medical society guidelines and statements endorsing its use for CVD risk reduction in patients generally meeting REDUCE-IT inclusion criteria. IPE should be considered for CVD prevention as a statin adjunct in all such patients.Plain Language SummaryCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Statin monotherapy is conventionally used first-line to reduce the risk of CV events, such as heart attacks and strokes, in patients with elevated cholesterol. However, considerable risk remains despite appropriate control of cholesterol levels with a statin. Consequently, research has focused on treatment of additional therapeutic targets to reduce this remaining CV risk. One such target is elevated blood triglyceride levels. Unfortunately, most drugs that lower triglyceride levels, such as niacin, fibrates, and mixed omega-3 fatty acids, have not reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in clinical trials when added to statin therapy. However, the omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid ('EPA') administered in highly purified form as icosapent ethyl (IPE) has emerged as the first omega-3 fatty acid, and the first triglyceride-lowering agent to prevent CV events when added to statins. This was demonstrated most notably in the pivotal REDUCE-IT trial, in which IPE reduced the risk of major CV events by 25% in high-risk patients with mildly to moderately elevated triglyceride levels despite statin-controlled cholesterol levels. The mechanisms responsible for this reduction in CV events appear to go far beyond lowering triglyceride levels alone. In light of the positive results from the REDUCE-IT trial, IPE was approved for CV disease risk reduction globally, including in the United States, Canada, European Union, and the United Kingdom, and its use is being increasingly endorsed in United States and international statements and guidelines for managing CV risk. Despite minor differences among guidelines, there is strong consensus that IPE should be considered for use in CVD prevention in all patients who meet the proposed criteria.

Healthcare utilisation databases, and other secondary data sources, have been used with growing frequency to assess health outcomes and healthcare interventions worldwide. Their increased popularity as a research tool is due to their timely availability, the large patient populations covered, low cost, and applicability for studying real-world clinical practice. Despite the need to measure Italian National Health Service performance both at regional and national levels, the wealth of good quality electronic data and the high standards of scientific research in this field, healthcare research and public health policies seem to progress along orthogonal dimensions in Italy. The main barriers to the development of evidence-based public health include the lack of understanding of evidence-based methodologies by policy makers, and of involvement of researchers in the policy process. The CRACK programme was launched by some academics from the Lombardy Region. By extensively using electronically stored data, epidemiologists, biostatisticians, pharmacologists and clinicians applied methods and evidence to several issues of healthcare research. The CRACK programme was based on their intention to remove barriers that thwart the process of bridging methods and findings from scientific journals to public health practice. This paper briefly describes aim, articulation and management of the CRACK programme, and discusses why it might find articulated application in Italy.

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a genetic disorder characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) since birth and an exceedingly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, especially in the homozygous form (HoFH). Despite the availability of effective cholesterol-lowering drugs, substantial LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reductions in these patients are still problematic, especially in those carrying mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (Loss-of-function mutations in angiopoietin-like 3 (Most lipid-lowering agents available so far are insufficient to achieve an appropriate response in HoFH patients. The inhibition of ANGPTL3 with evinacumab halves LDL-C levels in HoFH patients by an LDLR-independent mechanism. The results obtained so far have clearly indicated a promising improvement in the management of these patients. As the reduction of CV risk is proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C levels, we can expect that treatment with evinacumab, added to the maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, will turn into a significant clinical benefit.

Dyslipidaemias are alterations to the plasma lipid profile that are often associated with clinical conditions. Dyslipidaemias, particularly elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol levels, are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but some forms, such as hypertriglyceridaemia, are associated with severe diseases in other organ systems, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and acute pancreatitis. Dyslipidaemias can be genetically determined (primary or familial dyslipidaemias) or secondary to other conditions (such as diabetes mellitus, obesity or an unhealthy lifestyle), the latter being more common. Hypercholesterolaemia is the most common form of dyslipidaemia and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, with elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol levels being the 15th leading risk factor for death in 1990, rising to 11th in 2007 and 8th in 2019. The global burden of dyslipidaemias has increased over the past 30 years. Furthermore, the combination of high triglyceride levels and low HDL-cholesterol levels (together with the presence of small, dense LDL particles), referred to as atherogenic dyslipidaemia, is highly prevalent in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome and increases their risk of cardiovascular disease. Given the increasing prevalence of diabetes worldwide, treating lipid abnormalities in these patients might reduce their risk of cardiovascular disease. Dyslipidaemias, particularly hypercholesterolaemia, are major risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In this Review, Catapano and colleagues summarize the latest data on plasma lipid levels and associated deaths and trends in these parameters over the past four decades in different regions of the world.

Many patients do not achieve optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with statins alone; others are unable to tolerate statin therapy. Additional non-statin treatment options including ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants are often necessary to further reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This review provides practical guidance as to the use of bempedoic acid to lower LDL-C and includes direction as to which patients may benefit and advice for safety monitoring during treatment. Bempedoic acid, a new class of agent, is a prodrug converted to bempedoyl-CoA by very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1, an enzyme with high expression in the liver but that is undetectable in the skeletal muscle. Bempedoic acid inhibits the enzyme adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-citrate lyase, which lies two steps upstream from β-hydroxy β-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. In clinical trials conducted in patients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia, bempedoic acid in combination with statins and/or ezetimibe significantly reduced LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with placebo. Bempedoic acid is generally well tolerated with no clinically meaningful increase in muscle-related symptoms relative to placebo, even in patients taking maximally tolerated statins. A small increase in serum uric acid (mean increase 0.8 mg/dL) is the most noteworthy adverse effect. Bempedoic acid provides an effective and generally well-tolerated medication to further reduce LDL-C in patients taking maximally tolerated statins or manage LDL-C levels in those who are unable to take statins. The potential for a reduced incidence of major cardiovascular events with bempedoic acid is being investigated in the CLEAR Outcomes trial, with results expected in 2023.

Aims We sought to evaluate physicians’ opinions and practices in lipid management. Methods and results A web-based survey by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) was distributed to 70 696 individuals at two time points, before and after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines. Respondents (1271 in the first and 1056 in the second part) were most commonly cardiologists in Europe. More than 90% of participants reported that they regularly measure lipid levels and discuss lipid-lowering treatment with patients. More than 87% found the use of LDL-C goals useful or potentially useful, although it was acknowledged that recommended goals are frequently not achieved. Regarding the LDL-C goal according to the 2019 guidelines ( Conclusions This survey shows a high level of acceptance of the LDL-C treatment goals recommended by current ESC/EAS guidelines. Although patient-related factors were the main reported reasons for suboptimal lipid-lowering therapy, physician inertia to intensify treatment cannot be excluded as an additional contributing factor.