Search

AimTo examine the impact of diabetes mellitus on procedural outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.MethodsWe assessed the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion among 1308 people who underwent such procedures at 11 US centres between 2012 and 2015.ResultsThe participants' mean ± sd age was 66 ± 10 years, 84% of the participants were men and 44.6% had diabetes. As compared with participants without diabetes, participants with diabetes were more likely to have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (38 vs 31%; P = 0.006), and to have had previous heart failure (35 vs 22%; P = 0.0001) and peripheral arterial disease (19 vs 13%; P = 0.002). They also had a higher BMI (31 ± 6 kg/m2 vs 29 ± 6 kg/m2 ; P = 0.001), similar Japanese chronic total occlusion scores (2.6 ± 1.2 vs 2.5 ± 1.2; P = 0.82) and similar final successful crossing technique: antegrade wire escalation (46 vs 47%; P = 0.66), retrograde (30 vs 28%; P = 0.66) and antegrade dissection re-entry (24 vs 25%; P = 0.66). Technical (91 vs 90%; P = 0.80) and procedural (89 vs 89%; P = 0.93) success was similar in the two groups, as was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (2.2 vs 2.5%; P = 0.61).ConclusionsIn a contemporary cohort of people undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion, nearly one in two (45%) had diabetes mellitus. Procedural success and complication rates were similar in people with and without diabetes.

Background: Beta-blocker therapy has been reported to improve survival and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of congestive heart failure (CHF). The magnitude and predictors of improved LVEF are unclear.Methods: A total of 295 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were LVEF <35% at baseline and symptomatic (New York Heart Association class II to IV) CHF despite treatment with at minimum an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Carvedilol was initiated at 3.125 mg twice daily and titrated to a target dose of 25 or 50 mg twice daily, depending on the patient's weight. Paired pretreatment baseline and 9 months with treatment follow-up quantitative LVEFs (assessed by resting radionuclide ventriculograms) were obtained in 161 (55 %) of the patients.Results: LVEF improved from 25% +/- 6% at baseline to 36%+/-12% at follow-up (P<.001). Mean change in LVEF (deltaLVEF) was greater for nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (+14.5+/-2 LVEF points) than ischemic cardiomyopathy (deltaLVEF +/- 7.6+/-10 EF points, P = .001). The deltaLVEF was > or =21 LVEF points in 30% of the NICM group versus 10% of the ischemic cardiomyopathy group. Conversely, the deltaLVEF was unchanged to minimally improved (< or =5 LVEF points) in 21% of the NICM group versus 52% of the ischemic cardiomyopathy group. Multivariable analysis identified NICM and recent onset of congestive heart failure as correlates of improved LVEF.Conclusions: Carvedilol significantly improved LVEF, especially in patients with NICM and those with recent onset of CHF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prevention, prompt diagnosis, and rapid treatment are crucial for improving outcomes of complications that occur during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors summarize studies on PCI complications published between January 1, 2023, and May 1, 2024, including coronary dissection, no reflow, perforation, and equipment loss/entrapment.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of left main (LM) chronic total occlusions (CTO) has received limited study., Methods: We compared the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent LM versus non-LM CTO PCI at 41 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2024., Results: During the study period 85 of 15,254 CTO PCIs (0.6%) performed in 14,969 patients were LM CTO PCIs. LM CTO PCI patients were older, had higher rates of dyslipidemia and heart failure and most (88.8%) had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). They were more likely to have moderately or severely calcified lesions (80.7% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001) and had higher J-CTO (2.76 ± 1.17 vs. 2.37 ± 1.26, p = 0.008), PROGRESS-CTO MACE (3.56 vs. 2.57, p < 0.001), Mortality (2.45 vs. 1.68, p < 0.001), Pericardiocentesis (2.74 vs. 1.87, p < 0.001), Acute MI (1.72 vs. 0.89, p < 0.001) and Perforation (3.21 vs. 2.19, p < 0.001) scores. There was no difference in technical success (80.5% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.086) or major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) (2.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.700). LM CTO PCI patients with and without prior CABG surgery had similar technical success and MACE. The retrograde approach in prior CABG patients was more likely to be performed through saphenous vein grafts., Conclusions: LM CTO PCI is infrequently performed, is associated with high comorbidity burden and angiographic complexity but can be performed with high success and acceptable complication rates., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Left atrial veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (LAVA-ECMO) in CS is a novel mechanical cardiocirculatory support strategy that provides robust cardiocirculatory support and simultaneous left and right atrial venting via a multi-fenestrated transeptal catheter. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients aged ≥ 18 years with CS who underwent LAVA-ECMO at a quaternary care institution from 2018-2023. Clinical outcomes as well as pre- and post-hemodynamics were evaluated. A total of 68 patients were analyzed (75% male, 72% white, median age 63). Indications for LAVA-ECMO were CS due to myocardial infarction (29.4%), biventricular failure (26.5%), and/or valvular heart disease (26.5%). Trans-septal puncture was guided by intracardiac echocardiography (86.8%) or transesophageal echocardiography (13.2%). Arterial cannulation was performed via transcaval access in 25% of the cases. Post-LAVA-ECMO cannulation was associated with substantial improvement in the hemodynamics within 24 hours post cannulation, including reduction in right atrial pressure (absolute mean difference: -5.0 mmHg, p<0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (-9.0 mmHg, p<0.001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-10.0 mmHg, p<0.001), and LV end-diastolic pressure (-14.0 mmHg, p<0.001). Survival to decannulation occurred in 69.1%, while 30-day survival from cannulation was 51.5%. In-hospital all-cause mortality was 51.5%. Only 5 patients (7.4%) required additional MCS (4 Impella, 1 VAV-ECMO). There were no complications related to transeptal placement of the venous ECMO cannula. In conclusion, LAVA-ECMO, a MCS strategy providing bi-atrial drainage, appears to also provide simultaneous LV venting as demonstrated by improved invasive hemodynamics. Although the procedure itself appears safe, with no direct complications to interatrial septal cannulation, post-cannulation complications remain high, and further studies are needed to evaluate the full safety profile of LAVA-ECMO compared to alternative MCS strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To examine the characteristics and outcomes of myocardial infarction (MI) among burn patients., Materials and Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was utilized to identify hospitalizations of patients with burns from 2016 to 2020. The main outcome was the difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality between burn patients with and without MI., Results: Of 200,130 hospitalizations with burns, 1997 (1 %) developed acute MI. Burn patients with MI were older, more likely to be men, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Only burns affecting the trunk and respiratory tract, and those affecting > 20 % of body surface area (BSA), were associated with an increased risk of MI. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher among patients with MI (18.7 % vs. 3 %, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.66, 5.76). Cardiogenic shock, ventricular tachycardia, and stroke rates were higher among patients with MI. Revascularization was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.17, 0.64) CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MI in burn patients is low but is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Burns involving the trunk and respiratory tract, and those affecting > 20 % BSA, were associated with an increased risk of MI. Revascularization was associated with lower in-hospital mortality., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited information about the frequency and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in anomalous coronary arteries (ACA)., Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of CTO PCI in ACA among 14,173 patients who underwent 14,470 CTO PCIs at 46 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023., Results: Of 14,470 CTO PCIs, 36 (0.24%) were CTO PCIs in an ACA. ACA patients had similar baseline characteristics as those without an ACA. The type of ACA in which the CTO lesion was found were as follows: anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (ARCA) (17, 48.5%), anomalous origin of left circumflex coronary artery (9, 25.7%), left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery with separate origins (4, 11.4%), anomalous origin of the left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%), dual left anterior descending artery (2, 5.7%) and woven coronary artery 1 (2.8%). The Japan CTO score was similar between both groups (2.17 ± 1.32 vs 2.38 ± 1.26, p = 0.30). The target CTO in ACA patients was more likely to have moderate/severe tortuosity (44% vs 28%, p = 0.035), required more often use of retrograde approach (27% vs 12%, p = 0.028), and was associated with longer procedure (142.5 min vs 112.00 min [74.0, 164.0], p = 0.028) and fluoroscopy (56 min [40, 79 ml] vs 42 min [25, 67], p = 0.014) time and higher contrast volume (260 ml [190, 450] vs 200 ml [150, 300], p = 0.004) but had similar procedural (91.4% vs 85.6%, p = 0.46) and technical (91.4% vs 87.0%, p = 0.59) success. No major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were seen in ACA patients (0% [0] vs 1.9% [281] in non-ACA patients, p = 1.00). Two coronary perforations were reported in ACA CTO PCI (p = 0.7 vs. non-ACA CTO PCI)., Conclusions: CTO PCI of ACA comprise 0.24% of all CTO PCIs performed in the PROGRESS CTO registry and was associated with higher procedural complexity but similar technical and procedural success rates and similar MACE compared with non-ACA CTO PCI., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The J-CTO investigators recently developed angiographic difficulty scores for each of the three major coronary arteries in patients undergoing first-attempt chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in de novo occlusions., Methods: We examined the performance of the individual J-CTO scores in a large multicenter registry., Results: The CTO lesion location was as follows: right coronary artery (RCA) 3,805 (54%), left anterior descending artery (LAD) 2,303 (33%), and left circumflex (LCX) 935 (13%). Patients in the PROGRESS-CTO registry were younger, more likely to be female, and had higher J-CTO scores compared with the J-CTO registry. Increasing difficulty scores were associated with lower technical success in the PROGRESS-CTO registry (score 0: 94.4 % - score ≥3: 82.6% for the RCA difficulty score; score 0: 96.4% - score ≥3: 86.1 for the LAD difficulty score; and score 0: 95.4% - score ≥3: 81.2% for the LCX difficulty score). The C-statistic of the coronary artery specific J-CTO scores in the PROGRESS-CTO registry were: LAD 0.69 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.64-0.73), LCX 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57-0.69), and RCA 0.61 (95-% CI, 0.58-0.64) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value >0.05 for all). The AUC of the classic J-CTO score for LAD lesions was similar with the LAD J-CTO score (p-for-difference = 0.26), but worse for LCX (p-for-difference = 0.04) and RCA lesions (p-for-difference = 0.04)., Conclusion: In the PROGRESS-CTO registry, the coronary artery specific J-CTO scores did not improve prediction of the technical success of CTO-PCI compared with the classic J-CTO score., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Azzalini: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott, Teleflex, GE Healthcare, Reflow Medical, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Abiomed, serving as advisory board member in Abiomed and GE Healthcare. Dr. Rinfret: consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and SoundBite Medical. Dr. Khatri: personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, Shockwave, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Alaswad: consulting/speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr. Jaffer: consulting/speaker honoraria from Canon, Biotronik, Teleflex, Boston Scientific, Heartflow, Siemens, Mercator, shareholder: Fastwave, DurVena, Intravascular Imaging Inc. Dr. Jaber: advisory board of Medtronic and reports proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr. Nicholson: proctor, speakers' bureau and advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr. Basir: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Saranas, Zoll. Dr. Davies: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Shockwave, Asahi Intec, Avinger, Teleflex. Dr. Frizzel: consulting/speaker honoraria from Shockwave, Asahi Intec, Boston Scientific, Teleflex. Dr. Choi: advisory board member of Medtronic. Dr. Potluri: consulting/speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Philips, Shockwave. Dr. Poommipanit: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Diagnostics, Asahi. Dr. Sandoval: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Zoll, Philips. JACC Advances associate editor. Patent 20,210,401,347. Dr. Burke: consulting and received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr. Brilakis: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dissection and re-entry techniques are essential to achieve safe and effective chronic total occlusion recanalization. Several studies have demonstrated similar outcomes following extraplaque stenting compared with intraplaque stenting. Dissection techniques most often involve the use of knuckled wires to progress within and beyond the chronic total occlusion segment. In this expert consensus document, the authors compare the properties of different polymer-jacketed wires for their use in dissection techniques. The authors also describe 2 principal knuckle wire behaviors, the rolling and the traveling knuckles. Finally, several adjunctive techniques for safer dissection are described., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Rinfret has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Teleflex. Dr Khatri has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Boston Scientific, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, OrbusNeich, Shockwave Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr Alaswad has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Boston Scientific and Teleflex. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Abbott Vascular, Reflow Medical, and Cardiovascular Systems; serves on the advisory boards of Abiomed and GE Healthcare; and owns equity in Reflow Medical. Dr Vijayaraghavan has received consulting and proctoring fees from Acist, Abbott, Asahi Intecc, Medtronic, and Biotronik. Dr Frizzell has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Reflow Medical, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Avran has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr McEntegart has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Boston Scientific and Shockwave Medical. Dr Lombardi has received consulting fees from Asahi Intecc, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex and has received royalties from Asahi Intecc; his spouse is a Philips employee. Dr Grantham has received speaking fees and honoraria from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Asahi Intecc; has received advisory board fees from Teleflex and Boston Scientific; and has received institutional research grants from Asahi Intecc, Abiomed, and Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, Teleflex, and Terumo; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner or Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There are limited comparative data on the use of plaque modification devices during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with rotational atherectomy (RA) for lesion preparation in patients who underwent CTO PCI across 50 US and non-US centers from 2019 to 2024. Of 15,690 patients who underwent CTO PCI during the study period, 436 (2.78%) underwent IVL and 381 (2.45%) RA. Patients treated with IVL had more co-morbidities and more complex CTO lesions. Antegrade wiring was the most used initial and successful crossing strategy for lesions treated with both IVL and RA, although the retrograde approach was more frequently used in IVL cases. Procedure and fluoroscopy times, and air kerma radiation doses and contrast volumes, were greater in patients treated with RA than those treated with IVL. There were no significant differences between the groups in technical success (97.2% vs 95.3%, p = 0.20), procedural success (94.7% vs 91.8%, p = 0.14), and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (3.0% vs 4.2%, p = 0.47). However, coronary artery perforations were more frequent in patients who underwent RA (9.5% vs 3.2%, p <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that IVL compared with RA was not independently associated with technical success, procedural success, or in-hospital MACE. In patients who undergo CTO PCI, IVL is associated with similar in-hospital MACE, technical success, and procedural success but lower incidence of coronary artery perforation compared with RA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Jaffer reports sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, and Neovasc; consultant/speakers fees from Magenta Medical, Philips, Biotronik, Mercator, Terumo (Canon), Abiomed, Shockwave, DurVena, Intravascular Imaging Inc., Medtronic, and FastWave; equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc., DurVena, and FastWave; and Massachusetts General Hospital licensing arrangements: Terumo, Canon, and SpectraWAVE, for which Dr. Jaffer has the right to receive royalties. Dr. Azzalini received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), Reflow Medical, Shockwave, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.; received a research grant by Abiomed; serves on the advisory board of Abiomed and GE Healthcare; and owns equity in Reflow Medical. Dr. Davies receives speaking honoraria from Abiomed, Asahi Intec, Boston Sci, Medtronic, Shockwave, and Teleflex; and serves on advisory boards for Abiomed, Avinger, Boston Sci, Medtronic, Rampart, and Shockwave. Dr. Sandoval receives consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Zoll, and Philips; is JACC Advances associate editor; and reports Patent 20,210,401,347. Dr. Brilakis receives consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medtronic, and Teleflex; research support from Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; is owner, Hippocrates LLC; and is shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As the field of percutaneous coronary intervention grows in volume, expertise, and available tools, interventional cardiologists are increasingly performing more complex and higher-risk coronary artery procedures. Mechanical circulatory support devices, previously used only in urgent situations, are now being utilized as supplementary tools to enhance outcomes in elective complex cases. This shift has sparked significant discussions about patient and device selection, as well as the potential risks involved. In this article, we explore the various devices and their distinct features. Additionally, we also introduce algorithms for device selection, placement and weaning to help guide physicians during their care for their high-risk PCI patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Basir is a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Saranas and Zoll., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients experiencing loss of pulse pressure (LOPP) during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) are transiently dependent on mechanical circulatory support devices. We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during HR-PCI., Methods and Results: Patients enrolled in the PROTECT III study and had automated Impella controller logs capturing real-time hemodynamics were included in this analysis. A LOPP event was defined as a mean pulse pressure on Impella of <20 mm Hg for ≥5 seconds during PCI. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were then compared between those with and without LOPP. Logistic regression identified clinical and hemodynamic predictors of LOPP. We included 302 patients, of whom 148 patients (49%) experienced LOPP. Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar in patients with and without LOPP. Mean baseline systolic blood pressure (118.6 mm Hg vs 129.8 mm Hg; P < .001) and mean arterial pressure (86.9 mm Hg vs 91.6 mm Hg; P = .011) were lower in patients with LOPP, whereas heart rate (78 bpm vs 73 bpm; P = .012) was higher. Anatomical complexity was similar between groups. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; P = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; P = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; P = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively)., Conclusions: LOPP on Impella during HR-PCI was common and occurred more frequently in patients with cardiomyopathy and a low systolic blood pressure. LOPP was strongly associated with higher 90-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, acute kidney injury, and mortality. Condensed Abstract We sought to define the frequency and clinic outcomes of patients who experience LOPP during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). We included 302 patients, of whom 148 (49%) experienced LOPP. Patients with LOPP were more likely to experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (23.5% vs 8.8%; P = .002), acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 2.6%; P = .030), and death (20.2% vs 7.9%; P = .008) within 90 days. A low baseline systolic blood pressure and cardiomyopathy were the strongest predictors of LOPP (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively)., Competing Interests: Disclosures Mir B. Basir is a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Saranas and Zoll. Dana Bentley is an employee of Abiomed. Alexander G. Truesdell is a consultant/speaker for Abiomed and a speaker for Shockwave. Katherine Kunkel is a consultant and speaker for Abiomed and Shockwave Medical, speaker for Cardiovascular Systems Incorporated, and consultant for Medtronic and Bristol Myers Squibb/Janssen. Alejandro Lemor discloses a speaker honorarium from Abiomed. Michael Megaly has no disclosures. Mohammad Alqarqaz discloses an institutional research grant from Abiomed. Khaldoon Alaswad is a consultant and speaker for BSC, Teleflex, and CSI. Akshay Khandewal has no disclosures. Elise Jortberg is an employee of Abiomed. Sanjog Kalra is a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Philips Healthcare, Cardiovascular Systems, and Translumina Therapeutics; on the advisory board for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Philips Healthcare, Medtronic, and Avinger; on the speaker's bureau for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Philips Healthcare, Cardiovascular Systems, Translumina Therapeutics, and Medtronic; a sponsored research participant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and Philips Healthcare; and a proctor for Boston Scientific, Philips Healthcare, and Translumina Therapeutics. Amir Kaki is a speaker/proctor for Abiomed, Abbott, Boston Scientific, CSI, Medtronic, and Terumo. Daniel Burkhoff is on the Steering Committee for RECOVER IV sponsored by Abiomed (institutional compensation). Jeffrey W. Moses received honoraria or consulting fees from Abiomed, Philips, and Boston Scientific. Duane S. Pinto received honoraria or consulting fees from Abiomed, Abbott Vascular, Haemonetics, CSL Behring, Biotronik, Shockwave, Terumo, and Medtronic. Gregg W. Stone discloses that he has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Pulnovo, Infraredx, Abiomed, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served as a consultant to Abbott, Daiichi Sankyo, Ablative Solutions, CorFlow, Apollo Therapeutics, Cardiomech, Gore, Robocath, Miracor, Vectorious, Abiomed, Valfix, TherOx, HeartFlow, Neovasc, Ancora, Elucid Bio, Occlutech, Impulse Dynamics, Adona Medical, Millennia Biopharma, Oxitope, Cardiac Success, HighLife; and has equity/options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, Valfix, and Xenter. Dr. Stone's employer, Mount Sinai Hospital, receives research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Bioventrix, Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Phillips, Biosense-Webster, Shockwave, Vascular Dynamics, Pulnovo, and V-wave. Family disclosure: Dr. Stone's daughter is an employee at IQVIA. William W. O'Neill is a consultant to Abiomed, Zoll, and Edwards Lifesciences., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ranolazine is an anti-anginal medication given to patients with chronic angina and persistent symptoms despite medical therapy. We examined 11 491 chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) that were performed at 41 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023 in the PROGRESS-CTO Registry. Patients on ranolazine at baseline had more comorbidities, more complex lesions, lower procedural and technical success (based on univariable but not multivariable analysis), and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (on both univariable and multivariable analysis).

Background: There is variability in clinical and lesion characteristics as well as techniques in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We analyzed patient and lesion characteristics, techniques, and outcomes in 11 503 CTO-PCI procedures performed in North America (NA) and in the combined regions of Europe, Asia, and Africa from 2017 to 2023 as documented in the PROGRESS-CTO registry., Results: Eight thousand four hundred seventy-nine (74%) procedures were performed in NA. Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients were older, with higher body mass index and higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of coronary artery disease, prior history of PCI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Their CTOs were more complex, with higher J-CTO (2.56 ± 1.22 vs 1.81 ± 1.24; P less than .001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.29 ± 1.01 vs 1.07 ± 0.95; P less than .001) scores, longer length, and higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity, blunt/no stump, moderate to severe calcification, and proximal tortuosity. Retrograde (31.0% vs 22.1%; P less than .001) and antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) (21.2% vs 9.2%; P less than .001) were more commonly used in NA centers, along with intravascular ultrasound (69.0% vs 10.1%; P less than .001). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were longer in NA, while contrast volume and radiation dose were lower. Technical (86.7% vs 86.8%; P > .90) and procedural (85.4% vs 85.8%; P = .70) success and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (1.9% vs 1.7%; P = .40) were similar in NA and non-NA centers., Conclusions: Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients undergoing CTO PCI have more comorbidities, higher CTO lesion complexity, are more likely to undergo treatment with retrograde and ADR, and have similar technical success and MACE.

Background: Despite optimal medical therapy, a significant proportion of patients' blood pressure remains uncontrolled. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a potential intervention for uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with emphasis on the differential effect of RDN in patients on and off antihypertensive medications., Methods and Results: Online databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety of RDN versus control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sham-controlled trials and studies that used RDN devices that have gained or are currently seeking US Food and Drug Administration approval. Fifteen trials with 2581 patients (RDN, 1723; sham, 858) were included. In patients off antihypertensive medications undergoing RDN, a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory (-3.70 [95% CI, -5.41 to -2.00] mm Hg), office (-4.76 [95% CI, -7.57 to -1.94] mm Hg), and home (-3.28 [95% CI, -5.96 to -0.61] mm Hg) systolic blood pressures was noted. In patients on antihypertensive medications, a significant reduction was observed in 24-hour ambulatory (-2.23 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.90] mm Hg), office (-6.39 [95% CI, -11.49 to -1.30]), home (-6.08 [95% CI, -11.54 to -0.61] mm Hg), daytime (-2.62 [95% CI, -4.14 to -1.11]), and nighttime (-2.70 [95% CI, -5.13 to -0.27]) systolic blood pressures, as well as 24-hour ambulatory (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.96 to -0.35]), office (-3.17 [95% CI, -5.54 to -0.80]), and daytime (-1.47 [95% CI, -2.50 to -0.27]) diastolic blood pressures., Conclusions: RDN significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, in patients off and on antihypertensive medications, with a favorable safety profile. The efficacy of RDN was consistent in sham-controlled trials and contemporary trials using US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices.

Background: While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has broadened treatment options for critically ill patients, outcomes among those with concomitant cardiogenic shock (CS) are not well-explored., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of major databases for studies comparing outcomes following TAVR in patients with and without CS since inception up to October 31, 2023. Our meta-analysis included five non-randomized observational. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel method (risk ratio, 95 % CI), and continuous outcomes were evaluated using mean difference and 95 % CI with the inverse variance method. Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the inconsistency test (I 2 )., Results: Among 26,283 patients across five studies, 30-day mortality was higher in the CS group (7267 patients; 27.6 %) compared to those without CS (OR 3.41, 95 % CI [2.01, 5.76], p < 0.01), as well as 30-day major vascular complications (OR 1.72, 95 % CI [1.54, 1.92], p < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the compared groups (OR 2.68, 95 % CI [0.53, 13.46], p = 0.12). No significant between-group differences were observed in the likelihood of 30-day aortic valve reintervention (OR 3.20, 95 % CI [0.63, 16.22], p = 0.09) or post-TAVR aortic insufficiency (OR 0.91, 95 % CI [0.33, 2.51], p = 0.73). Furthermore, 30-day stroke, pacemaker implantation, and in-hospital major bleeding were comparable between both cohorts., Conclusion: Among patients undergoing TAVR, short-term mortality is higher but one-year outcomes are similar when comparing those with, to those without, CS. Future studies should examine whether TAVR outcomes are improved when the procedure is delayed to optimize CS and when delay is not possible, whether particular management strategies lead to more favorable periprocedural outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well studied., Methods: We analyzed the association of PAD with CTO-PCI outcomes using data from the PROGRESS-CTO registry of procedures performed at 47 centers between 2012 and 2023., Results: The prevalence of PAD among 12 961 patients who underwent CTO PCI during the study period was 13.9% (1802). PAD patients were older, more likely to be current smokers, and had higher rates of dyslipidemia, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, PCI, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Their PROGRESS-CTO (1.35 vs 1.22; P < .001) and J-CTO (2.63 vs 2.33; P < .001) scores were higher, lesion length was longer, and angiographic characteristics were more complex. Their access site was more likely to be bifemoral (33.6% vs 30.9%; P = .024) compared with patients with no PAD. Technical (82.9% vs 87.7%; P < .001) and procedural (80.5% vs 86.6%; P < .001) success rates were lower in patients with PAD, while the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was higher (3.1% vs 1.8%; P < .001), with higher mortality (0.8% vs 0.4%; P = .034), acute myocardial infarction rate (0.9% vs 0.4%; P = .010), and perforations rate (6.6% vs 4.5%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, PAD was associated with higher MACE (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.26; P = .038) and lower technical success (OR: 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99; P = .039)., Conclusions: PAD patients undergoing CTO PCI have higher comorbidity burden, more complex CTOs, higher MACE, and lower technical success.

Background: There is limited data on predicting successful chronic total occlusion crossing using primary antegrade wiring (AW)., Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) prognostic model for successful chronic total occlusion crossing using primary AW., Methods: We used data from 12,136 primary AW cases performed between 2012 and 2023 at 48 centers in the PROGRESS CTO registry (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; NCT02061436) to develop 5 ML models. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for the model with the best performance, and the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) explainer was implemented to estimate feature importance., Results: Primary AW was successful in 6,965 cases (57.4%). Extreme gradient boosting was the best performing ML model with an average area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.775 (± 0.010). After hyperparameter tuning, the average area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the extreme gradient boosting model was 0.782 in the training set and 0.780 in the testing set. Among the factors examined, occlusion length had the most significant impact on predicting successful primary AW crossing followed by blunt/no stump, presence of interventional collaterals, vessel diameter, and proximal cap ambiguity. In contrast, aorto-ostial lesion location had the least impact on the outcome. A web-based application for predicting successful primary AW wiring crossing is available online (PROGRESS-CTO website) (https://www.progresscto.org/predict-aw-success)., Conclusions: We developed an ML model with 14 features and high predictive capacity for successful primary AW in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Choi serves on the Advisory Board of Medtronic. Dr Poommipanit is a consultant for Asahi Intecc and Abbott Vascular. Dr Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, Shockwave, and Boston Scientific. Dr Davies has received speaking honoraria from Abiomed, Asahi Intec, Boston Sci, Medtronic, Shockwave, and Teleflex; and serves on the Advisory Boards of Abiomed, Avinger, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Rampart. Dr Jaffer has performed sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, and Boston Scientific; has serves as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, and Intravascular Imaging Inc; has equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc and DurVena; and has the right to receive royalties through Massachusetts General Hospital licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave. Dr Jaber has received fees from Medtronic; and has received proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr Rinfret has received fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and SoundBite Medical; and has served as a consultant for Teleflex. Dr Nicholson has served as a proctor for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; has served on the Speakers Bureau and Advisory Boards of Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and has intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare, Abbott Vascular, Reflow Medical, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc; serves on the Advisory Boards of Abiomed and GE Healthcare; and owns equity in Reflow Medical. Dr Kearney has received consulting fees or honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Philips, Medtronic, Teleflex, and Reflow Medical. Dr Alaswad has served as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr Abi-Rafeh has received proctor and speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and Shockwave Medical. Dr Elguindy has received consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo; and has received proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo. Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, Teleflex, and Terumo; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) disproportionately affects women, presenting challenges during pregnancy. Historically, patients with PH are advised to avoid pregnancy; however, recent reports have indicated that the incidence of adverse events in pregnant patients with PH may be lower than previously reported. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in pregnant patients with PH using the National Readmission Database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. PH was categorized according to the World Health Organization classification. Primary end points include maternal mortality and 30-day nonelective readmission rate. Other adverse short-term maternal (cardiovascular and obstetric) and fetal outcomes were also analyzed. Of 9,922,142 pregnant women, 3,532 (0.04%) had PH, with Group 1 PH noted in 1,833 (51.9%), Group 2 PH in 676 (19.1%), Group 3 PH in 604 (17.1%), Group 4 PH in 23 (0.7%), Group 5 PH in 98 (2.8%), and multifactorial PH in 298 (8.4%). PH patients exhibited higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events (15.7% vs 0.3% without PH, p <0.001) and mortality (0.9% vs 0.01% without PH, p <0.001). Mixed PH and Group 2 PH had the highest prevalence of adverse cardiovascular events in the World Health Organization PH groups. Patients with PH had a significantly higher nonelective 30-day readmission rate (10.4% vs 2.3%) and maternal adverse obstetric events (24.2% vs 9.1%) compared with those without PH (p <0.001) (Figure 1). In conclusion, pregnant women with PH had significantly higher adverse event rates, including in-hospital maternal mortality (85-fold), compared with those without PH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Antegrade wiring is the most commonly used chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing technique., Methods: Using data from the PROGRESS CTO registry (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02061436), we examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of CTO percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed using a primary antegrade wiring strategy., Results: Of the 13 563 CTO PCIs performed at 46 centers between 2012 and 2023, a primary antegrade wiring strategy was used in 11 332 (83.6%). Upon multivariable logistic regression analysis, proximal cap ambiguity (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.46-0.59), side branch at the proximal cap (OR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.95), blunt/no stump (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.59), increasing lesion length (OR [per 10 mm increase]: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81), moderate to severe calcification (OR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.81), moderate to severe proximal tortuosity (OR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75), bifurcation at the distal cap (OR: 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73), left anterior descending artery CTO (OR [vs right coronary artery]: 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.62) and left circumflex CTO (OR [vs right coronary artery]: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.40), non-in-stent restenosis lesion (OR: 0.56; 95% CI, 0.49-0.65), and good distal landing zone (OR: 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32) were independently associated with primary antegrade wiring crossing success., Conclusions: The use of antegrade wiring as the initial strategy was high (83.6%) in our registry. We identified several parameters associated with primary antegrade wiring success.

Aims: Despite increased temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) utilization for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), data regarding efficacy and optimal timing for tMCS support are limited. This study aimed to describe outcomes based on tMCS timing in AMI-CS and to identify predictors of 30-day mortality and readmission., Methods and Results: Patients with AMI-CS identified in the National Readmissions Database were grouped according to the use of tMCS and early (<24 h) vs. delayed (≥24 h) tMCS. The correlation between tMCS timing and inpatient outcomes was evaluated using linear regression. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with 30-day mortality and readmission. Of 294 839 patients with AMI-CS, 109 148 patients were supported with tMCS (8067 veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 33 577 Impella, and 79 161 intra-aortic balloon pump). Of patients requiring tMCS, patients who received early tMCS (n = 79 906) had shorter lengths of stay (7 vs. 15 days, P < 0.001) and lower rates of ischaemic and bleeding complications than those with delayed tMCS (n = 32 241). Patients requiring tMCS had higher in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] [1.7 (1.7-1.8), P < 0.001]. Among patients requiring tMCS, early support was associated with fewer complications, lower mortality [0.90 (0.85-0.94), P < 0.001], and fewer 30-day readmissions [0.91 (0.85-0.97), P = 0.005] compared with patients with delayed tMCS., Conclusion: Among patients receiving tMCS for AMI-CS, early tMCS was associated with fewer complications, shorter lengths of stay, lower hospital costs, and fewer deaths and readmissions at 30 days., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K.H.: consultant for Abiomed. P.M.E.: consulting for Abbott, Ancora, Daxor, Medtronic. M.B.B.: consulting/speaker Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, Chiesi, Zoll. J.A.C.: consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, BiVACOR, CorWAVE, Endotronix (unpaid), Nuwellis (unpaid), Berlin Heart (DSMB), Procyrion (Stock options). K.A.: consultant and speaking honoraria from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, CSI, LivaNova. Patent: antegrade haemodynamic support. Y.S.: consultant for Abbott diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Philips, Zoll. E.S.B.: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Ebix, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support from Regeneron and Siemens. Shareholder: MHI Ventures. K.G.B., S.M., A.E., and M.S.M.: nothing to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: There is limited data on retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (IEC)., Aims: To compare the clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI via IEC versus other collaterals in a large multicenter registry., Methods: Observational cohort study from the Prospective Global registry for the study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO)., Results: Of 4466 retrograde cases performed between 2012 and 2023, crossing through IEC was attempted in 191 (4.3%) cases with 50% wiring success. The most common target vessel in the IEC group was the left circumflex (50%), in comparison to other retrograde cases, where the right coronary artery was most common (70%). The Japanese CTO score was similar between the two groups (3.13 ± 1.23 vs. 3.06 ± 1.06, p = 0.456); however, the IEC group had a higher Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) score (1.95 ± 1.02 vs. 1.27 ± 0.92, p < 0.0001). The most used IEC guidewire was the SUOH 03 (39%), and the most frequently used microcatheter was the Caravel (43%). Dual injection was less common in IEC cases (66% vs. 89%, p < 0.0001). Technical (76% vs. 79%, p = 0.317) and procedural success rates (74% vs. 79%, p = 0.281) were not different between the two groups. However, IEC cases had a higher procedural complications rate (25.8% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.0008), including perforations (17.3% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.0001), pericardiocentesis (3.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.018), and dissection/thrombus of the donor vessel (3.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002)., Conclusion: The use of IEC for retrograde CTO PCI was associated with similar technical and procedural success rates when compared with other retrograde cases, but higher incidence of periprocedural complications., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP) score is a tool developed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) database to define CHIP cases and predict in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE)., Aim: To assess the validity of the CHIP score in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We evaluated the performance of the CHIP score on 8341 CTO PCIs from the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) performed at 44 centers between 2012 and 2023., Results: In our cohort, 7.8% (n = 647) of patients had a CHIP score of 0, 50.2% (n = 4192) had a CHIP score of 1-2, 26.2% (n = 2187) had a CHIP score of 3-4, 11.7% (n = 972) had a CHIP score of 5-6, 3.3% (n = 276) had a CHIP score of 7-8, and 0.8% (n = 67) had a CHIP score of 9+. The incidence of MACCE for a CHIP score of 0 was 0.6%, reaching as high as 8.7% for a CHIP score of 9+, confirming that a higher CHIP score is associated with a higher risk of MACCE. The estimated increase in the risk of MACCE per one score unit increase was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65%-141%). The AUC of the CHIP score model for predicting MACCE in our cohort was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.58-0.67). There was a positive correlation between the CHIP score and the PROGRESS-CTO MACE score (Spearman's correlation: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.35-0.39; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The CHIP score has modest predictive capacity for MACCE in CTO PCI., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Successful collateral channel (CC) crossing is essential for the success of retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Based on the Japanese CTO PCI expert registry, the J-Channel score was developed to predict CC crossing. We examined the performance of the J-Channel score in patients who underwent retrograde CTO-PCI at 31 centers between 2013-2023 as part of the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO). We observed an association between successful CC crossing and the J-Channel score, its predictive efficacy was modest for both wire and microcatheter crossing.

Background: Utilization of right ventricular mechanical circulatory support (RV-MCS) devices has been limited by a lack of recognition of RV failure as well as a lack of availability and experience with RV-MCS., Aims: We report a single-center experience with the use of percutaneous RV-MCS and report predictors of adverse outcomes., Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Data from consecutive patients who received RV-MCS for any indication between June 2015 and January 2022 were included. Data on baseline comorbidities, hemodynamics, and laboratory values were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality analyzed as a logistic outcome in a multivariable model. These variables were further ranked by their predictive value., Results: Among 58 consecutive patients enrolled, the median age was 66 years, 31% were female and 53% were white. The majority of the patients (48%) were hospitalized for acute on chronic heart failure. The majority of the patients were SCAI SHOCK Stage D (67%) and 34 (64%) patients had MCS placed within 24 h of the onset of shock. Before placement of RV-MCS, median central venous pressure (CVP) and RV stroke work index were 20 mmHg and 8.9 g m/m 2 , respectively. Median serum lactate was 3.5 (1.6, 6.2) mmol/L. Impella RP was implanted in 50% and ProtekDuo in the remaining 50%. Left ventricular MCS was concomitantly used in 66% of patients. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) died. In these patients, median serum lactate was significantly higher (4.1 [2.3, 13.0] vs. 2.2 [1.4, 4.0]  mmol/L, p = 0.007) and a trend toward higher median CVP (24 [18, 31] vs. 19 [14, 24] mmHg, p = 0.052). In the multivariable logistic model, both serum lactate and CVP before RV-MCS placement were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Serum lactate had the highest predictive value., Conclusion: In our real-world cohort, 52% of patients treated with RV-MCS survived their index hospitalization. Serum lactate at presentation and CVP were the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: There is limited data on equipment loss or entrapment during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We analyzed the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of equipment loss/entrapment at 43 US and non-US centers between 2017 and 2023., Results: Equipment loss/entrapment was reported in 40 (0.4%) of 10 719 cases during the study period. These included guidewire entrapment/fracture (n = 21), microcatheter entrapment/fracture (n = 11), stent loss (n = 8) and balloon entrapment/fracture/rupture (n = 5). The equipment loss/entrapment cases were more likely to have moderate to severe calcification, longer lesion length, higher J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO complications scores, and use of the retrograde approach compared with the remaining cases. Retrieval was attempted in 71.4% of the guidewire, 90.9% of the microcatheter, 100% of the stent loss, and 100% of the balloon cases, and was successful in 26.7%, 30.0%, 50%, and 40% of the cases, respectively. Procedures complicated by equipment loss/entrapment had higher procedure and fluoroscopy time, contrast volume and patient air kerma radiation dose, lower procedural (60.0% vs 85.6%, P less than .001) and technical (75.0% vs 86.8%, P = .05) success, and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (17.5% vs 1.8%, P less than .001), acute MI (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001), emergency coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (2.5% vs 0.1%, P = .03), perforation (20.0% vs 4.9%, P less than .001), and death (7.5% vs 0.4%, P less than .001)., Conclusions: Equipment loss is a rare complication of CTO PCI; it is more common in complex CTOs and is associated with lower technical success and higher MACE.

Background: There has been a significant increase in the utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in recent years. Cardiothoracic surgery teams have historically led VA-ECMO care teams, with little data available on alternative care models., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a cardiovascular medicine inclusive VA-ECMO service, analyzing patients treated with peripheral VA-ECMO at a large quaternary care center from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was death while on VA-ECMO or within 24 hours of decannulation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of the primary outcome., Results: Two hundred forty-four patients were included in the analysis (median age 61 years; 28.7% female), of whom 91.8% were cannulated by interventional cardiologists, and 84.4% were managed by a cardiology service comprised of interventional cardiologists, cardiac intensivists or advanced heart failure cardiologists. Indications for VA-ECMO included acute myocardial infarction (34.8%), decompensated heart failure (30.3%), and refractory cardiac arrest (10.2%). VA-ECMO was utilized during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 26.6% of cases, 48% of which were peri-procedural arrest. Of the patients, 46% survived to decannulation, the majority of whom were decannulated percutaneously in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. There was no difference in survival following cannulation by a cardiac surgeon vs interventional cardiologist (50% vs 45%; P = .90). Complications included arterial injury (3.7%), compartment syndrome (4.1%), cannulation site infection (1.2%), stroke (14.8%), acute kidney injury (52.5%), access site bleeding (16%) and need for blood transfusion (83.2%). Elevated baseline lactate (odds ratio [OR], 1.13 per unit increase) and sequential organ failure assessment score (OR, 1.27 per unit increase) were independently associated with the primary outcome. Conversely, an elevated baseline survival after VA ECMO score (OR, 0.92 per unit increase) and 8-hour serum lactate clearance (OR, 0.98 per % increase) were independently associated with survival., Conclusions: The use of a cardiovascular medicine inclusive ECMO service is feasible and may be practical in select centers as indications for VA-ECMO expand., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

There is significant variation in wire utilization patterns for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of polymer-jacketed wires (PJWs) versus non-PJWs in anterograde procedures. We analyzed clinical and angiographic characteristics, and procedural outcomes of 7,575 anterograde CTO percutaneous coronary interventions that were performed at 47 centers between 2012 and 2023. Cases in which PJWs were exclusively used were classified in the PJW group, whereas cases where at least one non-PJW was employed were classified in the non-PJW group. Study end points were as follows: technical success, coronary perforation, major adverse cardiac event. PJWs were exclusively used in 3,481 cases (46.0%). These cases had lower prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity, blunt stump, and moderate/severe calcification. They also had lower Japanese CTO (J-CTO), Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion (PROGRESS-CTO), and PROGRESS-CTO complications scores, higher technical success (94.3% vs 85.7%, p <0.001), and lower perforation rates (2.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.013). Major adverse cardiac event rates did not differ between groups (1.3% vs 1.5%, p = 0.53). Exclusive use of PJWs was independently associated with higher technical success in both the multivariable (odds ratio [OR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13 to 3.36, p <0.001) and inverse probability of treatment weight analysis (OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.04 to 2.89, p <0.001). Exclusive use of PJWs was associated with lower risk of perforation in the multivariable analysis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.95, p = 0.02), and showed a similar trend in the inverse probability of treatment weight analysis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04, p = 0.09). Exclusive use of PJWs is associated with higher technical success and lower perforation risk in this non-randomized series of patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Plaque modification microcatheters (PM) (Tornus [Asahi] and Turnpike Gold [Teleflex]) are devices that are mainly used to modify the cap or lesion and maintain good support in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI). We evaluated the frequency of use and outcomes of plaque modification microcatheters in an international multicenter registry. Plaque modification microcatheters were utilized in 242 cases (1.6%: Tornus in 51% and Turnpike Gold in 49%) with decreasing frequency over time (P-for-trend: 0.007 and 0.035, respectively). Technical and procedural success and the incidence of major cardiac adverse events were similar with Tornus and Turnpike Gold use. PM are infrequently utilized in CTO-PCI and are associated with high success and acceptable complication rates.

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to evolve. This review summarizes recent publications categorized by outcomes, techniques, complications, and ongoing studies in this rapidly growing area.

Objectives: There is limited data on race and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors sought to evaluate CTO PCI techniques and outcomes in different racial groups., Methods: We examined the baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes of 11 806 CTO PCIs performed at 44 US and non-US centers between 2012 and March 2023. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, repeat target-vessel revascularization, pericardiocentesis, cardiac surgery, and stroke prior to discharge., Results: The most common racial group was White (84.5%), followed by Black (5.7%), "Other" (3.9%), Hispanic (2.9%), Asian (2.4%), and Native American (0.7%). There were significant differences in the baseline characteristics between different racial groups. When compared with non-White patients, the retrograde approach and antegrade dissection re-entry were more likely to be the successful crossing strategies in White patients without any significant differences in technical success (86.4% vs 86.4%; P = .93), procedural success (84.8% vs 85.0%; P = .79), and in-hospital MACE (2.0% vs 1.5%; P = .15) between the 2 groups. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the "Other" racial group (91.0% vs 86.4% in White, 86.9% in Asian, 84.5% in Black, 84.5% in Hispanic, and 83.3% in Native American; P = .03) without any significant differences in procedural success or in-hospital MACE rates between the groups., Conclusions: Despite differences in baseline characteristics and procedural techniques, the procedural success and in-hospital MACE of CTO PCI were not significantly different between most racial groups.

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death globally, including the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. However, limited research has been conducted on the burden of CVD in this region. Our study aims to investigate the burden of CVD and related risk factors in the MENA., Methods: We used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 to examine CVD prevalence in 21 MENA countries. Prevalence and mortality were analyzed using Bayesian regression tools, demographic methods, and mortality-to-incidence ratios. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated, and risk factors were evaluated under the GBD's comparative risk assessment framework., Results: Between 1990 and 2019, CVD raw accounts in the MENA increased by 140.9%, while age standardized prevalence slightly decreased (-1.3%). CVD raw mortality counts rose by 78.3%, but age standardized death rates fell by 28%. Ischemic heart disease remained the most prevalent condition, with higher rates in men, while women had higher rates of CVA. Age standardized DALYs decreased by 32.54%. DALY rates varied across countries and were consistently higher in males. Leading risk factors included hypertension, high LDL-C, dietary risks, and elevated BMI.  The countries with the three highest DALYs in 2019 were Afghanistan, Egypt, and Yemen., Conclusions: While strides have been made in lessening the CVD burden in the MENA region, the toll on mortality and morbidity, particularly from ischemic heart disease, remains significant. Country-specific variations call for tailored interventions addressing socio-economic factors, healthcare infrastructure, and political stability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose. All authors have approved this manuscript and this submission., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A hemoglobin (Hb) level goal of 7-8 g/dL is a standard care threshold, prompting blood transfusion. The debate over whether acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients benefit from a more liberal transfusion strategy prompted a meta-analysis of relevant trials., Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies in anemic MI patients. Primary outcomes were recurrent MI and death/MI, while secondary outcomes included stroke, revascularization, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Due to the limited trials, we utilized the Paul-Mendele method with Hartung Knapp adjustment., Results: Involving 2155 patients with liberal transfusion and 2170 with conservative transfusion across four RCTs, liberal transfusion did not significantly reduce MI (relative risk [RR] 0.85; 95 % CI 0.72 - 1.02, p = 0.07) or death/MI (RR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.45 - 1.71, p = 0.57). No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (RR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.25 - 2.68, p = 0.63), stroke (RR 0.89; 95 % CI 0.48 - 1.64, p = 0.50), revascularization (RR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.48 - 1.80, p = 0.68), or heart failure (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 0.04 - 28.84, p = 0.88)., Conclusion: Our meta-analysis supports current medical guidelines, reinforcing the practice of limiting transfusions in acute MI patients to those with an Hb level of 7 or 8 g/dL. Liberal transfusion strategies did not show improved clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)