Search

Newborn screening (NBS) is a complex process that has high-stakes health implications and requires rapid and effective communication between many people and organizations. Currently, each NBS laboratory has its own method of reporting results to state programs, hospitals and individual providers, with wide variation in content and format. Pediatric care providers receive reports by mail, email, fax or telephone, depending on whether the results are normal or abnormal. This process is slow and prone to errors, which can lead to delays in treatment. Multiple agencies worked together to create national guidance for reporting newborn screening results with HL7 messages that contain a prescribed set of LOINC and SNOMED CT codes, report quantitative test results, and use standardized units of measure. Several states are already implementing this guidance. If the guidance is used nationally, office EHRs could capture NBS results more efficiently, and regional and national registries could better analyze aggregate results to facilitate improvements in NBS and further research for these rare conditions.

Review your organization's strategic and financial plan given the current economic erosion and challenges. If your organization can and should be a consolidator, identify the likely and desired opportunities. If your organization cannot or should not go it alone, start to look for a partner.

Federal, state, local, and community-based job training programs have been evolving and devolving for more than 30 years. The Manpower Development and Training Act, passed in 1962, marked the beginning of a continuously evolving national employment and training policy labeled successively Manpower and Manpower Development in 1962, Employment and Training in 1973, Job Training in 1983, and Workforce Investment in 1998. The changes in labels reflect changes in both the awareness of their connotations (the word manpower was sexist; it excluded women) and the focus of national policy.

Although more than 1 million cataract surgeries are performed annually in the United States, little is known about the frequency of use or cost of various services provided in connection with this procedure. To assess the frequency with which various ophthalmic, optometric, anesthesia, and medical services are provided in conjunction with cataract surgery and to estimate the cost to Medicare associated with those services, we analyzed 1985 through 1988 Medicare claims records of a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. The experience of 57 103 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent extracapsular cataract surgery in 1986 or 1987 that was not combined with another ophthalmologic procedure formed the basis of our analysis. Projections for current costs were performed using 1991 charges allowed by Medicare for physician services. We estimate that the median charge allowed by Medicare for a "typical" episode of cataract surgery in 1991 was approximately $2500. In addition to the $3.4 billion that Medicare spent in 1991 on such "typical" episodes, Medicare spent more than $39 million on miscellaneous "atypical" preoperative ophthalmologic tests, such as specular microscopy (14% of cases) and potential acuity testing (8% of cases), more than $7 million on postoperative ophthalmologic diagnostic tests, such as fluorescein angiography (3% of cases), and more than $18 million on perioperative medical services (most commonly electrocardiography and chest roentgenography). The major determinants of the cost to Medicare associated with cataract surgery are the rate of performance of cataract surgery and neodymium-YAG laser capsulotomy and the charges allowed for these procedures. Many other ophthalmologic and medical services are often provided preoperatively and/or postoperatively, but total Medicare expenditures for these services are relatively small.