Search

The study objective was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of ATI-450 with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).A parallel-assignment, placebo-controlled, investigator-blinded/patient-blinded multicenter study evaluated patients with moderate-to-severe RA aged 18 to 70 years. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to ATI-450 50-mg oral tablets twice daily or placebo with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to assess ATI-450 safety and tolerability. The secondary objectives were to assess the median percentage change from baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, the mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on CRP level (DAS28-CRP) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score hand-wrist assessments of synovitis or bone erosion at week 12, and the proportion of patients with American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 (ACR 20/50/70) and with DAS28-CRP scores of less than 2.6. The exploratory outcomes were change from baseline in endogenous and ex vivo-stimulated cytokine levels.ATI-450 was well tolerated with no severe adverse events reported. ATI-450 reduced median hs-CRP levels by 42% or more at all posttreatment timepoints. In the ATI-450 group, a mean (median) decrease in DAS28-CRP score of 2.0 (2.1) was observed at week 12; proportions of patients with an ACR 20/50/70 response in the per-protocol population were 60%, 33%, and 20%, respectively, at week 12. Endogenous plasma levels of key inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, interleukin 6, interleukin 8) were reduced across the 12 treatment weeks.This is the first clinical study demonstrating that selective mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) pathway blockade leads to a sustained antiinflammatory effect. This suggests that targeting the MK2 pathway mitigates the tachyphylaxis observed with p38 MAPK inhibitors in RA and supports further exploration.

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA) was previously evaluated in two Phase 2, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (BALANCE-1) or methotrexate (BALANCE-2). Objectives: To assess the final safety and efficacy of UPA in BALANCE-EXTEND, a 312-week open-label extension (OLE) enrolling pts who completed either BALANCE1 or BALANCE-2. Methods All pts initially received UPA 6 mg twice daily (BID). Increase to 12 mg BID was required for pts with Results Overall, 493 pts entered the OLE, receiving UPA for ≤6.2 years (Never titrated, n = 306; Titrated up, n = 149; Titrated up and down, n = 38), and 270 pts (54.8%) discontinued, mostly due to withdrawal of consent (16.8%; n = 83) or AEs (14.6%; n = 72). Mean (standard deviation) duration of UPA exposure was 3.8 (2.4) years (range Conclusion In this OLE, UPA treatment over ∼312 weeks showed sustained long-term efficacy in pts with RA who had completed Phase 2 RCTs. Overall safety results showed that UPA was well tolerated over time; the types and frequencies of AEs were consistent with those in pts with similar populations of moderately to severely active RA receiving Janus kinase inhibitors. Disclosure A. Kivitz: Consultancies; A Kivitz has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Flexion, Genzyme, Gilead, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sanofi Aventis, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, and UCB. Shareholder/stock ownership; A Kivitz owns stocks or options in Amgen, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Honoraria; A Kivitz has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Flexion, Genzyme, Gilead, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sanofi Aventis, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, and UCB. Grants/research support; A Kivitz's institution received fees from AbbVie for his role as a Principal Investigator in the study. A.F. Wells: Consultancies; AF Wells has received consulting fees from AbbVie. J.I. Vargas: Honoraria; JI Vargas has received honoraria from AbbVie. Grants/research support; JI Vargas has received fees from AbbVie as Principal Investigator in the study. H.S.B. Baraf: Consultancies; HSB Baraf has acted as a consultant for Gilead and Janssen. Grants/research support; HSB Baraf has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, and Janssen. M. Rischmueller: Consultancies; M Rischmueller has acted as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer, Sanofi US Services, and UCB Biosciences. Grants/research support; M Rischmueller has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen Global Services, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur Biologics, and UCB Biosciences. J. Klaff: Shareholder/stock ownership; J Klaff is employee of AbbVie and may own stocks or options. N. Khan: Shareholder/stock ownership; N Khan is an employee of AbbVie and may own stocks or options. Y. Li: Shareholder/stock ownership; Yihan Li is an employee of AbbVie and may own stocks and options. K. Carter: Shareholder/stock ownership; K Carter is an employee of AbbVie and may own stocks and options. A. Friedman: Shareholder/stock ownership; A Friedman is an employee of AbbVie and may own stocks and options. P. Durez: Corporate appointments; P Durez has received speaker fees from Eli Lilly and Galapagos.

Objective The aim of this study was to characterize the safety and efficacy of filgotinib, lanraplenib and tirabrutinib in patients with active SS. Methods This multicentre, double-blind study randomized patients with active primary or secondary SS [EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) ≥5) to receive filgotinib 200 mg (Janus kinase-1 inhibitor), lanraplenib 30 mg (spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor), tirabrutinib 40 mg (Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor), or placebo. The composite primary end point was the week-12 proportion of patients fulfilling protocol-specified improvement criteria (based on CRP and SS-related symptoms). The EULAR SS patient-reported index (ESSPRI) and the ESSDAI change from baseline (CFB) were secondary end points. Exploratory end points included disease-related biomarkers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) represented safety outcomes. Results The mean of the baseline ESSDAI was 10.1, and of ESSPRI was 6.2 in the 150 patients who were treated; 125 completed the 24-week placebo-controlled treatment period. At week 12, 43.3% of the filgotinib group achieved the primary end point (P = 0.17 vs placebo) vs 42.3% (P = 0.16), 34.7% (P = 0.33), and 26.7% of lanraplenib, tirabrutinib, and placebo groups, respectively. Neither secondary end point was met. Biomarker reductions included immunoglobulins classically associated with SS disease activity. Filgotinib ESSDAI CFB appeared more pronounced in subgroups with baseline ESSDAI ≥14 or without DMARDs/CSs. Most AEs were Grade 1 or 2. Conclusion Three drugs with disparate mechanisms were tested, but no significant differences vs placebo in primary or secondary end points were observed. These results may be considered hypothesis-generating, given the drug tolerability, subgroup analysis, and biomarker findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03100942.

Background The paradigm shift toward biologic medications in psoriasis care requires healthcare providers (HCPs) to become acquainted with mechanisms of action and safety profiles of these new treatments to confidently use them in practice. A better understanding of this paradigm shift is necessary to provide adequate education for HCPs in psoriasis care. Objectives This study assessed clinical practice gaps and challenges experienced by HCPs caring for patients with psoriasis. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to identify practice gaps and clinical challenges of dermatologists, rheumatologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners with various levels of clinical experience in academic and community-based settings. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected sequentially. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results A total of 380 psoriasis care providers in Canada and the US participated in this study. Analysis revealed challenges in establishing an accurate diagnosis of psoriasis (including screening for sub-type and distinguishing psoriasis from other skin conditions), selecting treatment (particularly regarding recently approved treatments), monitoring side effects, and collaborating with other HCPs involved in psoriasis care. Conclusion These findings highlight educational needs of HCPs involved in psoriasis care that could have repercussions on accurate and timely diagnosis of the condition, treatment initiation, side effect monitoring, and continuity of care. Findings provide a starting point for clinicians to reflect on their practice and for the improvement of continuing professional development interventions that would bridge these gaps.

ObjectivesRisankizumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor under study for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to ≤2 biological therapies (Bio-IR) and/or ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). Results through week 24 are reported here.MethodsAdults with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR were randomised to receive subcutaneously administered risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 during a 24-week, double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed key domains of PsA and patient-reported outcomes.ResultsA total of 444 patients (median age 53 years, range 23–84 years) were randomised to risankizumab (n=224) or placebo (n=220); 206 patients (46.5%) were Bio-IR. At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (51.3% vs 26.5%, pConclusionTreatment with risankizumab resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in key disease outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR.Trial registration numberNCT03671148.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to reduce pain and inflammation, and are considered the cornerstone of pharmacological intervention in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA); however, the long-term use of NSAIDs is debatable due to their restricted therapeutic potential and the risk of side effects and complications. Therefore, reduction in NSAID intake is desirable in r-axSpA patients. Here, we report the long-term NSAID-sparing effect of secukinumab over 4 years in patients with r-axSpA. This post hoc analysis pooled data from 3 secukinumab trials (MEASURE 2–4) for each secukinumab maintenance dose of 150 and 300 mg, regardless of the loading dose regimen being i.v. or s.c. NSAID intake was evaluated prospectively using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID score. Patients with an ASAS-NSAID score > 0 at baseline were analysed. NSAID-sparing endpoints included the mean change in the ASAS-NSAID score, the proportion of patients achieving 50% reduction, and the proportion of patients with an ASAS-NSAID score

Background The safety and effectiveness of live virus vaccines, such as the varicella-zoster vaccine, are unknown in patients with inflammatory diseases receiving immunomodulatory therapy such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Objective To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the live attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL) in patients receiving TNFis. Design Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02538341). Setting Academic and community-based rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology practices. Patients Adults aged 50 years or older receiving TNFis for any indication. Intervention Random assignment to ZVL versus placebo. Measurements Glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) from serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells measured at baseline and 6 weeks after vaccination. Suspected varicella infection or herpes zoster was clinically assessed using digital photographs and polymerase chain reaction on vesicular fluid. Results Between March 2015 and December 2018, 617 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ZVL (n = 310) or placebo (n = 307) at 33 centers. Mean age was 62.7 years (SD, 7.5); 66.1% of participants were female, 90% were White, 8.2% were Black, and 5.9% were Hispanic. The most common TNFi indications were rheumatoid arthritis (57.6%) and psoriatic arthritis (24.1%); TNFi medications were adalimumab (32.7%), infliximab (31.3%), etanercept (21.2%), golimumab (9.1%), and certolizumab (5.7%). Concomitant therapies included methotrexate (48.0%) and oral glucocorticoids (10.5%). Through week 6, no cases of confirmed varicella infection were found; cumulative incidence of varicella infection or shingles was 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0% to 1.2%). At 6 weeks, compared with baseline, the mean increases in geometric mean fold rise as measured by gpELISA and ELISpot were 1.33 percentage points (CI, 1.17 to 1.51 percentage points) and 1.39 percentage points (CI, 1.07 to 1.82 percentage points), respectively. Limitation Potentially limited generalizability to patients receiving other types of immunomodulators. Conclusion This trial informs safety concerns related to use of live virus vaccines in patients receiving biologics. Primary funding source The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the American College of Rheumatology.

ObjectiveTo characterise safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsData were integrated from seven trials (NCT01668641, NCT01894516, NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT02065700, NCT03025308). Results are from placebo (PBO)-controlled (through week (W)12) and long-term, as-treated (all available data for patients receiving ≥1 dose filgotinib 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily) datasets. We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs)/100 patient-years filgotinib exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Results3691 patients received filgotinib for 6080.7 PYE (median 1.6, maximum 5.6 years). During the PBO-controlled period, TEAEs, including those of grade ≥3, occurred at comparable rates with filgotinib or PBO; long-term EAIRs of TEAEs grade ≥3 were 6.4 and 7.6/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for deaths were 0.6/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 0.5 and 0.3/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for serious infection were 3.9, 3.3 and 2.4/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 1.6 and 3.1/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for herpes zoster were 0.6, 1.1, and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 1.8 and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. EAIRs for major adverse cardiovascular events were 0, 1.7 and 1.1/100PYE for FIL200, FIL100 and PBO; long-term EAIRs were 0.4 and 0.6/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100. No venous thromboembolism occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term EAIRs were 0.2 and 0/100PYE for FIL200 and FIL100.ConclusionsOver a median of 1.6 and maximum of 5.6 years of exposure, safety/tolerability of FIL200 and FIL100 were similar, with a lower incidence of infections with FIL200 among the long-term, as-treated dataset.

Background and Objectives Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major public health burden. While knee and hip joints are most commonly affected, the glenohumoral (shoulder) joint is also frequently involved. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) and triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension (TAcs) in patients with shoulder OA. Methods In this phase 2, randomized, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03382262), adults with moderately-to-severely symptomatic shoulder OA for ≥ 6 months randomly received a single ultrasound-guided intra-articular (IA) injection of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg. Safety was evaluated throughout 12 weeks post-injection; blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected pre-injection and through Day 85 post-injection. Results Among 25 randomized patients, 12 received TA-ER and 13 received TAcs. Most patients were female (60%), and all had moderate (72%) or severe (28%) shoulder OA. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by four (33%) patients following TA-ER and three (23%) following TAcs injection. No AE was serious or led to study discontinuation. Systemic exposure following TAcs was approximately 1.5-fold higher than that following TA-ER injection (geometric mean [GM] AUC0–last 873,543 vs 557,602 h × pg/mL). GM Cmax was also higher in TAcs- than TA-ER-treated patients (2034 vs 1283 pg/mL). Bioequivalence testing confirmed lower systemic TA exposure following TA-ER than TAcs IA injection. Conclusion These pharmacokinetic data confirm protracted release of TA from TA-ER following IA injection in patients with shoulder OA. Lower peak and systemic TA exposure following TA-ER suggests TA-ER could potentially confer an improved systemic safety profile over TAcs. Trial Registration Number NCT03382262 (December 22, 2017 retrospectively registered).

Objectives Apremilast monotherapy was evaluated up to 5 years in PALACE 4 (fourth PsA Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy study) DMARD-naïve patients with PsA. Methods Patients with active PsA were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 30 mg or apremilast 20 mg twice a day. Placebo patients were rerandomized to apremilast at week 16 or 24. Double-blind apremilast continued to week 52, with a 4-year open-label extension (≤260 weeks of exposure). Analyses through week 260 were based on observed data. Results A total of 527 patients were treated. Among patients randomized to apremilast 30 mg at baseline, 45.5% completed week 260. At study end, 24.8% reported conventional synthetic DMARD or steroid use for any reason. At week 260, 65.8%/39.0%/20.3% of apremilast 30 mg patients achieved ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses, respectively. PsA sign and symptom improvements were sustained up to week 260 with continued treatment, including reductions in swollen (84.8%) and tender (76.4%) joint counts. Among apremilast 30 mg patients with baseline enthesitis or dactylitis, 71.2% achieved a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score of 0 and 95.1% achieved a dactylitis count of 0. Over 50% of patients achieved a HAQ Disability Index minimal clinically important difference (≥0.35). In patients with ≥3% baseline psoriasis-involved body surface area, 60.3% and 47.6% achieved ≥50% and ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores, respectively. Patients continuing apremilast 20 mg also demonstrated consistent, sustained improvements. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. No new safety concerns were observed long term. Conclusions Apremilast led to sustained PsA efficacy up to 260 weeks and was well tolerated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT01307423.

ObjectivesDetermine the impact of 24-week risankizumab (RZB) versus placebo (PBO) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to one or two biologics (Bio-IR) and/or ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR).MethodsPatients in the Phase 3 trial, KEEPsAKE 2, were randomised (1:1) to RZB 150 mg or PBO by subcutaneous injection. PROs assessed: 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), Patient’s Assessment of Pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), Patient’s global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment—PsA (WPAI-PsA). Least squares mean change from baseline at week 24 was compared between RZB versus PBO by mixed-effects repeated regression modelling.ResultsAt week 24, RZB versus PBO treatment resulted in significant differences (95% CIs) in mean change from baseline in ranked secondary endpoints SF-36 physical component summary score (3.9 (2.4 to 5.3); pConclusionOverall, RBZ treatment resulted in improvements in pain, fatigue, health-related quality of life and ability to perform work in Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR patients with PsA.Trial registration numberNCT03671148.

Objective PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease in which the skin and joints are affected. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or two biologic therapies (Bio-IR) or one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. Methods In the ongoing, phase 3, KEEPsAKE 2 trial, patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 (period 1). At week 24 (period 2), patients who received placebo were switched to risankizumab, and all patients received risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks from weeks 28 to 208. Results At week 24, 51.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (n = 224) achieved ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR 20) vs 26.5% of placebo-treated patients (n = 220; P Conclusion Risankizumab was well tolerated and improved symptoms of PsA in Bio-IR/csDMARD-IR patients, with a consistent long-term safety profile from weeks 24 to 52. Trial registration United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov; KEEPsAKE 2; NCT03671148.

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily monotherapy after methotrexate withdrawal. Methods: OPAL Balance was an open-label, long-term extension study of tofacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis who participated in the OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond phase 3 studies. This 12-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, methotrexate withdrawal substudy (50 centres, 14 countries) included patients from OPAL Balance who completed tofacitinib treatment for 24 months or more (≥3 months' stable tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily) and were receiving methotrexate (7·5–20 mg/week). Patients were blindly randomised (1:1) using interactive response technology and received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with either placebo (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo group) or continued methotrexate (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate group). Patients were masked to placebo or methotrexate, with identical capsules used. Coprimary endpoints were changes from substudy baseline in psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASDAS) and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) at month 6 in all randomised patients with one or more substudy drug dose. Safety was assessed throughout. No specific statistical hypothesis (either superiority or non-inferiority) was tested. The study (OPAL Balance) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01976364) and is complete. Findings: Between Oct 30, 2017, and May 20, 2019, 180 patients from OPAL Balance who were eligible for the substudy were randomly assigned to treatment (90 patients received tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo and 89 patients assigned to tofacitinib plus methotrexate; one patient was not treated because of randomisation error). At month 6, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PASDAS were 0·23 (SE 0·08) for tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo and 0·14 (0·08) for tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate (treatment difference LSM 0·09 [95% CI –0·13 to 0·31]), and changes in HAQ-DI were 0·04 (0·03) and 0·02 (0·03), respectively (treatment difference 0·03 [–0·05 to 0·10]). Rates of adverse events, discontinuations because of adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and laboratory changes were generally similar between treatment groups, although liver enzyme elevations were more common with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus methotrexate than tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo. Flares of worsening symptoms was reported in one (1%) of 90 patients in the tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily plus placebo group (recorded as psoriatic arthropathy). Interpretation: Some patients with psoriatic arthritis who are stable on tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with background methotrexate might be able to discontinue methotrexate without clinically meaningful changes in disease activity and safety.

Objective: To report the primary (1-year) results from PREVENT, the first phase III study evaluating secukinumab in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: A total of 555 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with a loading dose (loading dose [LD] group), secukinumab 150 mg without a loading dose (non–loading dose [NL] group), or placebo weekly and then every 4 weeks starting at week 4. The NL group received placebo at weeks 1, 2, and 3 to maintain blinding. Switch to open-label secukinumab or standard of care was permitted after week 20. The study had 2 independent analysis plans, per European Union and non-US (plan A; week 16) and US (plan B; week 52) regulatory requirements. The primary end point was 40% improvement in disease activity according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS40) criteria at week 16 (in the LD group) and at week 52 (in the NL group) in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)–naive patients. Safety analyses included all patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Results: Overall, 481 patients completed 52 weeks of treatment, including 84.3% (156 of 185) in the LD group, 89.7% (165 of 184) in the NL group, and 86.0% (160 of 186) in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who switched to open-label or standard of care between weeks 20 and 48 was 50.8% in the LD group, 47.3% in the NL group, and 64.0% in the placebo group. Both primary and all secondary end points were met at week 16. The proportion of TNFi-naive patients who met ASAS40 was significantly higher for LD at week 16 (41.5%) and NL at week 52 (39.8%) versus placebo (29.2% at week 16 and 19.9% at week 52; both P < 0.05). No new safety findings were reported. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that secukinumab 150 mg provides significant and sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of nonradiographic axial SpA through 52 weeks. Safety was consistent with previous reports.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF‐06651600 (ritlecitinib), an irreversible inhibitor of JAK3 and the tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) kinase family, in comparison with placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods An 8‐week, phase II, double‐blind, parallel‐group study was conducted. Seventy patients who were seropositive for anti–citrullinated protein antibodies and/or rheumatoid factor were randomized 3:2 to receive oral PF‐06651600 (200 mg once daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. Eligible patients had an inadequate response to methotrexate, and the study design allowed up to 50% of patients to have previously received 1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor that was inadequately effective and/or not tolerated. The primary end point was change from baseline in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score at week 8, assessed by Bayesian analysis using an informative prior distribution for placebo response. Results Mean change from baseline in the SDAI score at week 8 was greater in the PF‐06651600 group (−26.1 [95% credible interval −29.7, −22.4]) than in the placebo group (−16.8 [95% credible interval −20.9, −12.7]; P < 0.001). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild in severity, and no treatment‐related serious AEs, severe AEs, or deaths were reported. The most common classes of AE were infections and infestations as well as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders; there was 1 mild case of herpes simplex in the PF‐06651600 group that was considered to be treatment related, which resolved within 3 days without study treatment discontinuation or antiviral therapy. Conclusion Treatment with the oral JAK3/TEC inhibitor PF‐06651600 (200 mg once daily) was associated with significant improvements in RA disease activity and was generally well‐tolerated in this small 8‐week study.

Summary Background The inflammatory reflex plays a role in regulating innate and adaptive immunity by modulating cellular and molecular inflammatory pathways. The vagus nerve is a major constituent of the inflammatory reflex and studies have shown that the reflex can be activated by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve. In this first in-human pilot study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturised vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) device for the treatment of multidrug-refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and prior insufficient response to two or more biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or Janus kinase inhibitors with at least two different modes of action were enrolled in a two-stage study done at five clinical research sites in the USA. Stage 1 was open label; participants were implanted with a miniaturised VNS device, which was activated for 1 min once a day. In stage 2, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive active stimulation (1 min once a day or 1 min four times a day) or sham stimulation (device implanted but not activated), with the sites and participants masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Clinical efficacy was assessed as a key secondary outcome. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03437473 . Findings 14 patients were enrolled between March 13 and Aug 8, 2018. Three patients received stimulation in stage 1 and, following safety review board approval, the remaining 11 patients were implanted during stage 2 and randomly assigned to receive 1 min of stimulation once daily (n=3), 1 min of stimulation four times daily (n=4), or no stimulation (n=4) for 12 weeks. There were no device-related or treatment-related serious adverse events. Surgery-related adverse events were Horner's syndrome and vocal cord paralysis (in one patient each), which resolved without clinically significant sequelae. No deaths were recorded. Interpretation VNS with a miniaturised neurostimulator was safe and well tolerated and reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with multidrug-refractory disease. These results support further evaluation in a larger randomised sham-controlled study. Funding SetPoint Medical.

Introduction The PrismRA® test identifies rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. This study evaluated the clinical and financial outcomes of incorporating PrismRA into routine clinical care of RA patients. Methods A decision-analytic model was created to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes in the 12-month period following first biologic treatment. Two treatment strategies were compared: (1) observed clinical decision-making based on a 175-patient cohort receiving an anti-TNF therapy as their first biologic after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and (2) modeled clinical decision-making of the same population using PrismRA results to inform first-line biologic treatment choice. Modeled costs include biologic drug pharmacy, non-biologic pharmacy, and total medical costs. The odds of inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies and various components of patient care were calculated based on PrismRA results. Results Identifying predicted inadequate responders to anti-TNF therapies resulted in a modeled 38% increase in ACR50 response to first-line biologic therapies. The fraction of patients who achieved an ACR50 response to any therapy (TNFi and others) within the 12-month period was 33% higher in the PrismRA-stratified population than in the unstratified population (59 vs. 44%, respectively). When therapy prescriptions were modeled according to PrismRA results, cost savings were modeled for all financial variables: overall costs (4% decreased total, 19% decreased on ineffective treatments), total biologic drug pharmacy (4% total, 23% ineffective), non-biologic pharmacy (2% total, 19% ineffective), and medical costs (6% total, 19% ineffective). Female sex was the clinical metric that showed the greatest association with inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.20, 4.88). Conclusions If PrismRA is implemented into routine clinical care as modeled, predicting which RA patients will have an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies could save > $7 million in overall ineffective healthcare costs per 1000 patients tested and increase targeted DMARD response rates in RA. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00226-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives This report provides data for the extent of B cell depletion and recovery, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of Sandoz rituximab (SDZ-RTX; GP2013; Rixathon®) compared with reference rituximab (Ref-RTX) up to week 52 of the ASSIST-RA study. Methods Patients were randomized to SDZ-RTX or Ref-RTX in combination with methotrexate according to the RTX label. The primary endpoint was analysed at week 24. Responders (28-joint DAS [DAS28] decrease from baseline >1.2) at week 24 with residual disease activity (DAS28 ≥2.6) were eligible for a second treatment course between week 24 and 52. Endpoints after week 24 included change from baseline in peripheral B cells, DAS28, ACR 20% response rate (ACR20), Clinical and Simplified Disease Activity Indexes (CDAI, SDAI) and HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI). Safety and immunogenicity were assessed by the incidence of adverse events and antidrug antibodies. Results Primary and secondary endpoints up to week 24 were met. Overall, 260/312 randomized patients completed treatment up to week 52. SDZ-RTX resulted in B cell concentrations over time similar to Ref-RTX. The efficacy of SDZ-RTX was similar to Ref-RTX up to week 52, as measured by DAS28, ACR20/50/70, CDAI, SDAI and HAQ-DI. Safety of SDZ-RTX was similar to Ref-RTX regarding frequency, type and severity of adverse events, which were consistent with the known Ref-RTX safety profile. The incidence of antidrug antibodies was low and transient similarly across treatment groups. Conclusion SDZ-RTX demonstrated similar B cell concentrations over time, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity to Ref-RTX over 52 weeks of the ASSIST-RA study.

Summary Background Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits interleukin 17A, has shown significant and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis over 3 years in the MEASURE 2 study. We report the 5-year (end-of-study) results of subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg in the MEASURE 2 study. Methods MEASURE 2 was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, study done in 13 countries and 53 centres. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis who were 18 years of age or older and fulfilled the modified New York criteria were randomly assigned to receive secukinumab (150 mg or 75 mg) or placebo subcutaneously at baseline and weeks 1, 2, and 3, and then every 4 weeks from week 4. At week 16, patients initially given placebo were randomly assigned again (placebo switchers) to receive secukinumab 150 mg or 75 mg. Efficacy results are reported for patients initially randomised to secukinumab 150 mg and those who switched from placebo to secukinumab 150 mg at week 16. An optional dose escalation from secukinumab 75 mg to 150 mg was initiated beginning week 140. We assessed efficacy endpoints at week 260 (5 years), including Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 and ASAS 40, inactive disease according to ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), BASDAI50, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, and ASAS partial remission. Analyses were stratified by anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) status (anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF inadequate response). The safety analysis included all patients who received one dose or more of secukinumab. We report data as observed without accounting for missing data. The MEASURE 2 study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01649375 . Findings 219 patients were randomly assigned during the trial and 150 (68%) completed 5 years of treatment, including 82 (77%) of 106 patients in the secukinumab 150 mg group and 68 (65%) of 105 in the secukinumab 75 mg group. Efficacy analysis in the secukinumab 150 mg group included 53 patients who completed the study and one additional patient who was assessed in the treatment period weeks 212–260, but did not complete the study. 134 (61%) of 219 patients were anti-TNF-naive and 85 (39%) were anti-TNF inadequate responders. ASAS responses at 5 years with secukinumab 150 mg were 36 (67%) of 54 patients (ASA20) and 27 (50%) patients (ASAS40). Sustained improvement was observed across other efficacy endpoints with secukinumab 150 mg at 5 years. At 5 years, the proportion of patients achieving efficacy endpoints of BASDAI 50 response was 53% (44/83); ASAS 5/6 response was 51% (42/83); ASDAS-CRP inactive disease was 21% (17/81); and ASAS partial remission was 25% (21/83). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates with any secukinumab dose for selected adverse events were 1·0 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0·4–1·9) for Candida infections, 0·5 (0·1–1·2) for Crohn's disease, 0·4 (0·1–1·1) for ulcerative colitis, 0·6 (0·2–1·4) for major adverse cardiovascular events, 0·5 (0·1–1·2) for uveitis, and 0·6 (0·2–1·4) for malignant or unspecified tumours. Interpretation Secukinumab 150 mg provided sustained improvement in the signs, symptoms, and physical function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 5 years of treatment. The safety profile of secukinumab remained consistent with previous reports. Funding Novartis Pharma.

Introduction Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We report the interim safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tofacitinib in PsA patients in OPAL Balance, a 3-year, open-label, long-term extension study (data cut-off: August 2017; database not locked, data may change). Methods Eligible patients from two phase (P) 3 (P3) tofacitinib PsA studies (OPAL Broaden, NCT01877668; OPAL Beyond, NCT01882439) entered OPAL Balance ≤ 3 months after completing the P3 study or discontinuing for reasons other than study-drug-related adverse events (AEs). Patients received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), with adjustments to 10 mg BID permitted post-month (M) 1. Certain concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were allowed. Primary endpoints were incidence/severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities, and changes from baseline in laboratory parameters (reported up to M36 and M30, respectively). Efficacy (clinical/patient-reported outcomes) was reported through M30. Results A total of 686 patients were treated; at data cut-off, 68.2% remained in the study. Mean (range) treatment duration was 641 (1–1032) days; total treatment duration was 1153.2 patient-years. By M36, 79.6, 13.8, and 8.6% of patients reported AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs, respectively. Five deaths occurred; one within the risk period (incidence rate [IR; patients with events/100 patient-years] 0.1). IRs for AEs of special interest were: all (non-serious and serious) herpes zoster, 1.7; serious infections, 0.9; opportunistic infections, 0.3 (all disseminated/multi-dermatomal herpes zoster); malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), 0.8; NMSC, 1.0; major adverse cardiovascular events, 0.3; pulmonary embolisms, 0.1; and arterial thromboembolisms, 0.4. No patients had deep vein thrombosis. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were elevated ≥ 3-fold the upper limit of normal in 4.0 and 2.2% of patients, respectively. Changes in laboratory parameters were generally stable over time, although lymphocyte counts decreased slightly. Efficacy was maintained through M30. Conclusions In this interim analysis of OPAL Balance, tofacitinib safety and efficacy in patients with PsA appeared to be consistent with those of the P3 studies. Efficacy was maintained over time. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01976364. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00209-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users., Plain Language Summary In many countries, tofacitinib is an approved medicine that can be used to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the study reported here (OPAL Balance), adult patients with PsA took tofacitinib for up to 3 years. We report a planned interim analysis, i.e., an analysis of information collected before the study finished. This early information suggests that the safety of tofacitinib, and how well it improved symptoms and quality of life (efficacy), was similar in this long study as in shorter studies. Information from the finished study will be reported later. OPAL Balance started on 17 February 2014. This interim analysis includes information collected by 31 August 2017. Before joining, patients had finished a 6-month or 12-month tofacitinib study (OPAL Broaden or OPAL Beyond). Patients in OPAL Balance took a 5 mg tofacitinib pill twice a day, but if PsA symptoms did not improve after 1 month, they could take a 10 mg pill twice a day. They could also take other medicines (including methotrexate or corticosteroids). Of the 686 patients who took tofacitinib, 546 (80%) experienced side effects over 3 years. These were considered serious for 95 patients (14%) and caused 59 patients (9%) to leave the study. Five patients died from causes not related to tofacitinib. Known tofacitinib side effects, including shingles (herpes zoster), serious infections (needing hospitalization), infections in patients with weakened immune systems, cancer, heart (cardiovascular) problems, and vein blockages (embolisms), were each reported by fewer than 20 patients. Most blood test results and tofacitinib efficacy were stable over 2.5 years. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00209-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ObjectivesBimekizumab selectively neutralises both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. We report efficacy and safety in a phase IIb dose-ranging study in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsAdults with AS (fulfilling modified New York criteria) were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks (double-blind period). At week 12, patients receiving bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg or placebo were re-randomised 1:1 to bimekizumab 160 mg or 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; other patients continued on their initial dose (dose-blind period). The primary end point was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 12 (non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data).Results303 patients were randomised: bimekizumab 16 mg (n=61), 64 mg (n=61), 160 mg (n=60), 320 mg (n=61) or placebo (n=60). At week 12, significantly more bimekizumab-treated patients achieved ASAS40 vs placebo (NRI: 29.5%–46.7% vs 13.3%; pConclusionsBimekizumab provided rapid and sustained improvements in key outcome measures in patients with active AS, with no unexpected safety findings versus previous studies.Trial registration numberNCT02963506.

Summary Background Secukinumab is an interleukin-17A inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis. In the phase 3 FUTURE 2 trial, secukinumab showed sustained improvement in clinical outcomes over 2 years. Because scarce data exists on the long-term treatment with biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis, we aimed to assess and describe the 5-year (end-of-study) results on the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg doses, as well as dose escalation, from the FUTURE 2 study. Methods FUTURE 2 is a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study done at 76 centres in Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. Patients with active psoriatic arthritis aged 18 years or older were randomly assigned to either secukinumab (300 mg, 150 mg, or 75 mg) or placebo weekly from baseline and then every 4 weeks from week 4. Secukinumab dose was escalated from 150 mg to 300 mg and from 75 mg to 150 mg or 300 mg starting at week 128, if active signs of disease were observed in patients, on the basis of the physician's assessment, with the escalated dose maintained thereafter. We assessed key efficacy endpoints at week 260 (5 years) for secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg, including American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses. The safety analysis included all patients who received one or more doses of secukinumab. We report data as observed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01752634 . Findings At randomisation, 65% of patients were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and 47% were receiving concomitant methotrexate. Of 397 patients randomly assigned in FUTURE 2, 248 (62%) completed 5 years of treatment, including 64 (64%) of 100 patients in the original secukinumab 300 mg group, 65 (65%) of 100 in the 150 mg group, 59 (60%) of 99 in the 75 mg group, and 60 (61%) of 98 in the placebo group. Overall, 127 (52%) of 242 patients required dose escalation during the study. ACR responses at 5 years were 71 (74%; ACR20), 50 (52%; ACR50), and 31 (32%; ACR70) of 96 evaluable patients in the secukinumab 300 mg group, and 67 (70%; ACR20), 41 (43%; ACR50), and 28 (29%; ACR70) of 96 evaluable patients in the secukinumab 150 mg group. From 24 to 32 weeks and from 48 to 84 weeks after dose escalation from secukinumab 150 mg to 300 mg, the proportions of ACR and PASI non-responders decreased, whereas the proportions of ACR and PASI responders increased. During the entire treatment period, the most frequent treatment-emergent serious adverse event was serious infection (exposure-adjusted incidence 1·7, 95% CI 1·1–2·5; n=25) in the any secukinumab group. No new or unexpected safety signals were reported. Interpretation Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg provided sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis, with consistent safety over 5 years. This study supports the clinical benefit and safety of long-term treatment with secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Funding Novartis.

Summary Background Primary Sjogren's syndrome is an autoimmune disease that presents as dryness of the mouth and eyes due to impairment of the exocrine glands. To our knowledge, no systemic therapies for primary Sjogren's syndrome have shown efficacy. CD40–CD154-mediated T cell–B cell interactions in primary Sjogren's syndrome contribute to aberrant lymphocyte activation in inflamed tissue, leading to sialadenitis and other tissue injury. Therefore, we investigated the safety and preliminary efficacy of iscalimab (CFZ533), a novel anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. Methods This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study took place at ten investigational sites across Europe (UK, n=4; Germany, Switzerland, and Hungary, n=1 each) and the USA (n=3). Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years and fulfilled the 2002 American European consensus group diagnostic classification criteria for primary Sjogren's syndrome. In the double-blind phase of the trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via computer-generated unique randomisation numbers to receive subcutaneous iscalimab (3 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 (cohort 1) or intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 (cohort 2). Randomisation was stratified according to baseline intake of oral corticosteroids. At week 12, patients in both cohorts received open-label iscalimab (same dose and route) for 12 weeks. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple doses of iscalimab in the two sequential dose cohorts. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events and efficacy of iscalimab versus placebo was assessed by clinical disease activity, as measured by the change in European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren's syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) score after 12 weeks of treatment. Analyses were done on a per-protocol basis. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02291029 . Findings Between Oct 22, 2014, and June 28, 2016, we assessed 82 patients for eligibility (25 for cohort 1 and 57 for cohort 2). 38 patients were excluded because of ineligibility. In cohort 1, 12 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 3 mg/kg doses of iscalimab (n=8) or placebo (n=4), and in cohort 2, 32 patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous 10 mg/kg doses of iscalimab (n=21) or placebo (n=11). Adverse events were similar between iscalimab treatment groups and placebo groups, with adverse events occurring in all patients in cohort 1, and in 52% and 64% of the iscalimab and placebo groups, respectively, in cohort 2. Two serious adverse events were reported (one case of bacterial conjunctivitis in cohort 1 and one case of atrial fibrillation in cohort 2), which were unrelated to treatment with iscalimab. Intravenous treatment with iscalimab resulted in a mean reduction of 5·21 points (95% CI 0·96–9·46; one-sided p=0·0090) in ESSDAI score compared with placebo. There was no signficiant difference in ESSDAI score between subcutaneous iscalimab and placebo. Interpretation To our knowledge, this is the first randomised, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study of a new investigational drug for primary Sjogren's syndrome that indicates preliminary efficacy. Our data suggest a role of CD40–CD154 interactions in primary Sjogren's syndrome pathology and the therapeutic potential for CD40 blockade in this disease should be investigated further. Funding Novartis Pharma.

Objective Our objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who continued biosimilar treatment throughout 78 weeks or who switched from reference infliximab (Remicade®) sourced from the EU (IFX-EU) at week 30 or week 54 in the REFLECTIONS B537-02 study. Methods In this phase III, double-blind, active-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe active RA were initially randomized to PF-SZ-IFX or IFX-EU, each with methotrexate (treatment period [TP] 1; N = 650). At week 30, patients receiving PF-SZ-IFX continued PF-SZ-IFX; patients receiving IFX-EU were re-randomized to continue IFX-EU or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (TP2; n = 566). From weeks 54 to 78, all patients received open-label treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (TP3; n = 505). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were analyzed during TP3. Results Efficacy was sustained and comparable across groups at week 78, with American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement response rates of 75.9% (biosimilar group), 77.8% (week 30 switch group), and 68.3% (week 54 switch group). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 28.9%, 29.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who were antidrug antibody (ADA) positive and neutralizing antibody positive (as a percentage of ADA-positive patients) was stable and comparable between groups. Conclusions Results to week 78 continue to support the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA. There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups, independent of a single treatment transition from IFX-EU to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30 or week 54. Trial Registration Number NCT02222493. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-019-00403-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective Characterize safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Data from three Phase 3 trials (NCT02889796, NCT02873936, and NCT02886728) and a long-term extension (NCT03025308) through September 2019 were integrated; patients received ≥1 dose of FIL 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily, or placebo (PBO). We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years FIL exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest. Results Among 3691 total patients and 6080.7 PYE, 229 Japanese patients received FIL for 311.4 PYE (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years). During the 12-week PBO-controlled period, serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to study drug disruption were comparable between FIL and PBO. Serious infection rates were 1.9%, 0%, and 2% for FIL200, FIL100, and PBO during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.8 and 2.1/100PYE. No herpes zoster (HZ) or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.0 and 2.1/100PYE (HZ) and 0.6 and 0/100PYE (MACE). Conclusion Long-term FIL treatment (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years exposure) was well tolerated at 100- and 200-mg doses in Japanese patients with RA.

Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids, including triamcinolone acetonide (TA), are a recommended treatment for hip osteoarthritis. We compared the safety and systemic exposure of TA extended-release (TA-ER) versus TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) in patients with hip osteoarthritis.In this phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03382262), patients with hip osteoarthritis were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive single IA injections of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis up to day 85. PK parameters included area under the concentration-time curve, total body drug clearance, maximum concentration (COf 30 patients (TA-ER: n = 15; TAcs: n = 15) randomized and included in the Safety Population, 25 patients were evaluated in the PK Population. TEAEs were reported in four of 15 (26.7%) patients who received TA-ER and in seven of 15 (46.7%) patients who received TAcs. The most common TEAEs included arthralgia and headache. All TEAEs were of grade 1 or 2 in severity. TA-ER produced substantially lower peak plasma TA concentrations compared with TAcs (CFollowing a single IA injection in the hip, TA-ER was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of TAcs. Systemic TA exposure was markedly lower in TA-ER-treated patients, consistent with the PK profile observed in knee osteoarthritis.gov identifier: NCT03382262.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to reduce pain and inflammation, and are considered the cornerstone of pharmacological intervention in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA); however, the long-term use of NSAIDs is debatable due to their restricted therapeutic potential and the risk of side effects and complications. Therefore, reduction in NSAID intake is desirable in r-axSpA patients. Here, we report the long-term NSAID-sparing effect of secukinumab over 4 years in patients with r-axSpA. This post hoc analysis pooled data from 3 secukinumab trials (MEASURE 2-4) for each secukinumab maintenance dose of 150 and 300 mg, regardless of the loading dose regimen being i.v. or s.c. NSAID intake was evaluated prospectively using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-NSAID score. Patients with an ASAS-NSAID score 0 at baseline were analysed. NSAID-sparing endpoints included the mean change in the ASAS-NSAID score, the proportion of patients achieving 50% reduction, and the proportion of patients with an ASAS-NSAID score 10. Percentages of patients who achieved BASDAI ≤ 2 were also assessed. Overall, 562 patients were included in this pooled analysis (secukinumab: 150 mg, N = 467; 300 mg, N = 95). The mean ASAS-NSAID score decreased with time in both the secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg dose groups. The proportion of patients who achieved 50% reduction in the ASAS-NSAID score and clinically meaningful reduction of ASAS-NSAID score 10 increased with time in both dose groups and in both low and high NSAID intake patients. The percentage of patients with a clinically relevant improvement (BASDAI ≤ 2) was consistently higher in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score 10 than in patients with an ASAS-NSAID score ≥ 10. Secukinumab provided sustained, long-term NSAID-sparing effects in patients with r-axSpA for up to 4 years of treatment, as measured using the ASAS-NSAID score. Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01649375 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01649375 ); NCT02008916 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02008916 ); NCT02159053 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02159053 ).

AIM To assess the impact of pre-specified patient characteristics on efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS Data were pooled from two (efficacy; N = 1545) or three (safety; N = 1754) phase 3 placebo-controlled trials. Change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain, WOMAC Physical Function and patient global assessment of OA (PGA-OA) scores was compared between tanezumab (2.5 and 5 mg) and placebo groups via analysis of covariance. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarised descriptively. Analyses were done in patient subgroups (men or women; age

A phase 3 randomized controlled study comparing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) to conventional TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) reported variable efficacy results. Enrollment criteria may have contributed to this discrepancy, as moderate-to-severe average daily pain (ADP) was required at baseline, whereas no limitations were placed on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A) pain severity. We conducted a post hoc sensitivity analysis to compare treatment effects in patients reporting moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain on both scales.Participants 40 years old with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to a single intra-articular injection of TA-ER 32 mg, TAcs 40 mg, or saline-placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Patient-reported ADP, WOMAC-A, rescue medication usage, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Participants who reported moderate-to-severe OA pain at baseline using both instruments (ADP ≥ 5 to ≤ 9, maximum 10 and WOMAC-A ≥ 2, maximum 4) were categorized as "concordant" pain reporters; patients with baseline moderate-to-severe OA on ADP only were termed "discordant" pain reporters.Two-hundred-ninety-two concordant pain reporters of 484 total subjects received TA-ER 32 mg (n = 95), TAcs 40 mg (n = 100), or saline-placebo (n = 97). Baseline characteristics and AE profiles of the concordant and discordant pain responders were consistent with the full analysis population. Among concordant pain reporters, TA-ER significantly (p 0.05) improved ADP scores vs. TAcs (weeks 5-19; area-under-the-effect [AUE]In patients reporting moderate-to-severe knee OA pain at baseline based on concordant ADP and WOMAC-A scores, TA-ER provided statistically significant pain relief for ≥ 12 weeks compared with conventional TAcs.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357459.Osteoarthritis is a chronic condition that greatly impacts patients. Pain is the most common symptom of osteoarthritis. Clinical trials evaluating the effects of new drugs to treat osteoarthritis pain frequently use scales to rate overall pain following treatment. Patients may rate their pain using a number that best describes their pain, with the lowest number typically meaning “no pain,” and the highest number typically meaning “pain as bad as you can imagine.” Other rating scales may be used to rate pain in situations commonly associated with osteoarthritis.Results from a large clinical trial demonstrated that injection of an extended-release steroid significantly reduced pain compared with a conventional steroid injection on only one of the two pain-reporting scales used in the trial. A closer look found that some patients reported their pain differently on the two rating scales at the start of the trial, with some reporting moderate-to-severe pain using one questionnaire and mild pain using the other. Here, we focused on those patients who reported having moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis knee pain on both pain scales at the start and found that the pain relief benefit associated with the extended-release steroid injection was greatly improved compared with the conventional steroid injection with both measures. Patients receiving the extended-release steroid injection also decreased their use of rescue medication for pain relief.

Introduction Despite of higher disease burden, lower efficacy to biologics has been reported in female compared to male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab by sex in patients with active AS from five phase 3 studies (MEASURE 1–5) through 52 weeks. Methods Baseline demographics, disease characteristics and efficacy outcomes at Weeks 16 and 52 were summarized for males versus females. Baseline predictor analysis used multivariable logistic regression for binary outcome measures or generalized linear model for continuous outcome measures to assess the impact of sex as one of the independent variables on selected efficacy outcomes at Week 52. Results Overall, 1031 males and 396 females were included in this analysis. Smoking status, hs-CRP, prior exposure to TNF inhibitors, BASMI occiput-to-wall and tragus-to-wall distance (cm) were higher in males, whereas MASES was higher in females. Efficacy outcomes i.e., ASAS40 responses and BASDAI change from baseline at Weeks 16 and 52 were generally comparable between males and females. Response rates were found to be significantly higher in male patients when compared with female patients only for ASDAS-CRP inactive disease (ID) at Week 52. Conclusion Comparable efficacy and safety outcomes were observed between male and female patients with active AS treated with secukinumab over 52 weeks. Further, sex was not an independent predictor of treatment response to secukinumab as assessed by ASAS40 responder rates and BASDAI change from baseline; association of ASDAS-CRP ID responder rates with sex warrants further exploration. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01358175, NCT01649375, NCT02008916, NCT02159053, and NCT02896127. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00380-2.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase-1-preferential inhibitor filgotinib versus placebo or tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsThis 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled phase III trial evaluated once-daily oral filgotinib in patients with RA randomised 3:3:2:3 to filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or filgotinib 100 mg (FIL100), subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg biweekly, or placebo (through week 24), all with stable weekly background MTX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Additional efficacy outcomes were assessed sequentially. Safety was assessed from adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.ResultsThe proportion of patients (n=1755 randomised and treated) achieving ACR20 at week 12 was significantly higher for FIL200 (76.6%) and FIL100 (69.8%) versus placebo (49.9%; treatment difference (95% CI), 26.7% (20.6% to 32.8%) and 19.9% (13.6% to 26.2%), respectively; both pConclusionsFilgotinib improved RA signs and symptoms, improved physical function, inhibited radiographic progression and was well tolerated in patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX. FIL200 was non-inferior to adalimumab.Trial registration numberNCT02889796.

Objectives 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG Co-A) reductase inhibitors (statins) are standard treatment for hyperlipidaemia. In addition to lipid-lowering abilities, statins exhibit multiple anti-inflammatory effects. The objectives of this study were to determine whether treatment of patients with RA with lovastatin decreased CRP or reduced disease activity. Methods We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 12 week trial of lovastatin vs placebo in 64 RA patients with mild clinical disease activity but an elevated CRP. The primary efficacy end point was the reduction in mean log CRP. Secondary end points included disease activity, RF and anti–CCP antibody titres. Mechanistic end points included levels of serum cytokines. Safety was assessed; hepatic and muscle toxicities were of particular interest. Results Baseline features were similar between groups. No significant difference in mean log CRP reduction between the two groups was observed, and disease activity did not change from baseline in either treatment group. Mechanistic analyses did not reveal significant changes in any biomarkers. A post hoc analysis of subjects not using biologic therapy demonstrated a significantly greater proportion achieving ⩾20% reduction in CRP from baseline in the lovastatin group compared with placebo (P-value = 0.007). No difference was observed in subjects receiving biologics. Lovastatin was well tolerated with no serious safety concerns. Conclusion This study showed no anti-inflammatory or clinical effects on RA disease activity after 12 weeks of treatment with lovastatin. Lovastatin had a modest effect on CRP in subjects not using biologics, suggesting statins may be anti-inflammatory in selected patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00302952.

Objective To prospectively assess the efficacy, general safety, and joint safety of fasinumab, an anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, in osteoarthritis (OA) hip and/or knee pain. Methods Patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain (knee or hip) and history of inadequate response or intolerance to analgesics were randomized to receive fasinumab (at 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, or 9 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks over 16 weeks and were followed up to week 36. Efficacy end points were the change from baseline to week 16 in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), and patient global assessment (PGA) of OA. Joints were monitored at scheduled assessments (by plain film radiography and magnetic resonance imaging) during treatment and follow-up, and if prompted, at the time of active joint symptoms. Results Of the 421 patients randomized, 342 completed the 36-week study. All doses of fasinumab yielded statistically significant and clinically important reductions in pain compared to placebo (least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain subscale scores at week 16 ranging -0.78 to -1.40), without any clear dose dependence. Physical function and PGA scores improved in parallel. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 17% with fasinumab and 10% with placebo, and 4% and 1% of patients, respectively, discontinued treatment. Arthropathies (25 in total, 7% of fasinumab-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients) occurred in a dose-dependent manner, with 2 occurring in patients receiving the lowest dose of fasinumab and 10 in patients receiving the highest dose. Most of the arthropathies (16 of 25) were discovered with scheduled radiographs and not based on symptoms. Destructive arthropathy (in 1 of 337 treated patients) occurred in 1 patient who was receiving 6 mg fasimumab. Conclusion Fasinumab provided improvements in OA pain and function, even in those benefitting little from previous analgesics. The observed benefit-to-risk relationship favors further clinical development to explore the lowest doses of fasinumab in patients with knee or hip OA.

Introduction Peficitinib is a novel orally bioavailable, once-daily Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This 2-year extension study of two global phase IIb trials investigated the long-term safety and effectiveness of peficitinib. Methods All eligible patients with moderate-to-severe RA including patients in the placebo group who participated in one of two global phase IIb trials (‘with methotrexate’ or ‘without methotrexate’) were included in this 2-year open-label extension study and were converted to peficitinib 100 mg once daily. The primary objective was to evaluate an additional 2 years of safety by assessing treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory evaluations for 105 weeks. Evaluation of an additional 2 years of effectiveness using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses was the exploratory objective. Results Overall, 611 patients were enrolled in the extension study: 319 (52.2%) patients completed the study and 292 (48%) discontinued treatment, including for withdrawal of patient consent (n = 96), failure to achieve low disease activity (n = 62), and AE not including death (n = 41). AEs were reported in 463 (76%) patients. The most common AEs (per 100 patient-years) were upper respiratory tract infections (9.9) and urinary tract infections (7.2). Serious AEs were reported in 80 (13%) patients, with incidences per 100 patient-years of serious infections 2.7, herpes zoster 1.5 (including one herpes zoster ophthalmic), and malignancies 0.6 (most frequently basal cell carcinoma). At week 105, 269 (44%) patients demonstrated an ACR20 response relative to their respective phase IIb trial baselines. Conclusion Among 319 patients who completed this 2-year extension of two global phase IIb studies, peficitinib 100 mg once daily demonstrated a stable safety profile and sustained effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01711814. Registered 19 October 2012. Funding Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-00167-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction In clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis (OAK), rescue medication is commonly provided to manage uncontrolled index-knee pain. The impact of treatment on rescue medication utilization provides important information on the robustness of analgesic effect. In randomized controlled OAK trials (NCT01487161, NCT02116972, NCT02357459), intra-articular (IA) triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) demonstrated substantial, prolonged analgesia versus saline-placebo and TA crystalline solution (TAcs) as assessed by patient-reported pain scales. This pooled analysis assessed the impact of TA-ER on rescue medication use. Methods Patients (N = 798) with OAK (American College of Rheumatology criteria; Kellgren–Lawrence grade 2/3) and baseline average daily pain intensity score ≥ 5 to ≤ 9 (0–10 numeric rating scale) received a single IA injection of TA-ER (N = 324), saline-placebo (N = 262), or TAcs (N = 212). Acetaminophen/paracetamol tablets were provided to treat uncontrolled pain (knee or otherwise). Rescue medication consumption was monitored through a daily diary; pill counts were confirmed at the clinical site. Differences in rescue medication use were measured by least-squares mean (LSM) differences, number of rescue medication tablets used per day, and in area under the effect (AUE) curves of rescue medication tablets used per week. Results The overall number of rescue medication tablets used per day through week 24 was significantly less (p ≤ 0.05) for TA-ER versus saline-placebo (LSM difference, − 0.43) and TAcs (− 0.24). Rescue medication use was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower following TA-ER versus saline-placebo across weeks 1–12 (AUEweeks1–12; LSM difference, − 24.5) and weeks 1–24 (AUEweeks1–24; − 51.6) and versus TAcs across weeks 1–12 (AUEweeks1–12; − 21.1). Conclusions In patients with painful OAK, reduced rescue medication use may be a potential benefit of TA-ER and further supports its analgesic efficacy. Additional research is needed to assess whether TA-ER impacts the use of other common oral analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids) for patients with OAK. Funding Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., Burlington, MA, USA. Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article.