Search

Supplementary fig 3 Tumor Regression Grade versus Baseline p-ERK score in Tumor Tissue

Supplementary fig 1 Flowchart for trial design

Supplementary fig 2 Schema for trial design

Table showing next generation sequencing of tumor samples

Supplementary fig 5 Degree of Reduction (%) in Tumor pERK Levels From Baseline to After Trametinib Monotherapy and Correlation With pCR

Supplementary fig 4 Baseline p-ERK score in Tumor Tissue Correlated to RAS/RAF Mutation Status

Purpose:The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is critical to the development of colorectal cancers, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations foster resistance to radiation. We performed a phase I trial to determine the safety of trametinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor, with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).Patients and Methods:Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were enrolled on a phase I study with 3+3 study design, with an expansion cohort of 9 patients at the MTD. Following a 5-day trametinib lead-in, with pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies, patients received trametinib and CRT, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Trametinib was given orally daily at 3 dose levels: 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg. CRT consisted of infusional 5-FU 225 mg/m2/day and radiation dose of 28 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy (total 50.4 Gy). The primary endpoint was to identify the MTD and recommended phase II dose. IHC staining for phosphorylated ERK (pERK) and genomic profiling was performed on the tumor samples.Results:Patients were enrolled to all dose levels, and 18 patients were evaluable for toxicities and responses. Treatment was well tolerated, and there was one dose-limiting toxicity of diarrhea, which was attributed to CRT rather than trametinib. At the 2 mg dose level, 25% had pathologic complete response. IHC staining confirmed dose-dependent decrease in pERK with increasing trametinib doses.Conclusions:The combination of trametinib with 5-FU CRT is safe and well tolerated, and may warrant additional study in a phase II trial, perhaps in a RAS/RAF-mutant selected population.

Structured Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to explore the trajectory of autonomy in clinical decision making. Methods We conducted a qualitative secondary analysis of interviews with 45 residents and fellows from the General Surgery and Obstetrics & Gynecology departments across all clinical postgraduate years (PGY) using convenience sampling. Each interview was recorded, transcribed and iteratively analyzed using a framework method. Results A total of 16 junior residents, 22 senior residents and 7 fellows participated in 12 original interviews. Early in training residents take their abstract ideas about disease processes and make them concrete in their applications to patient care. A transitional stage follows in which residents apply concepts to concrete patient care. Chief residents re-abstract their concrete technical and clinical knowledge to prepare for future surgical practice. Conclusions Understanding where each learner is on this pathway will assist development of curriculum that fosters resident readiness for practice at each PGY level.

We aimed to identify potential variables predictive of a resident achieving faculty future entrustment as a way to enhance attending surgeons' planning of teaching in the operating room leading to improved resident operative autonomy in practice.We reviewed 273 resident performance evaluations from 91 surgical cases that were collected from 11 general surgery chief residents and 16 attending surgeons between April 2018 and June 2019 using a validated evaluation instrument. The primary outcome measure was prospective resident entrustment estimated by the rater for future similar cases. We used descriptive statistics and the boosted tree analysis model to find potential predictors for the outcome measure and examine test-retest reliability by procedure.Step-specific guidance (r = 0.77, p 0.0001) was the variable most highly associated with prospective resident entrustment in bivariate linear analysis. The boosted tree analysis demonstrated step-specific guidance was the strongest predictor for prospective resident entrustment in the OR, and its predictive importance was much higher than the overall guidance (0.64 0.18). Test-retest reliability was from 0.93 to 0.98 across procedures, indicating the likelihood that attending surgeons granted future autonomy complied with their evaluation of prospective resident entrustment was high.By assessing step-specific guidance, attending surgeons can reliably judge residents' future entrustment and potentially better plan for operative teaching/supervision that may lead to granting a surgical resident operative autonomy on similar cases in the future. Our findings provide insight into prospective faculty development of surgical teaching aimed at improving resident readiness for independent practice.

Introduction We evaluated the effect of an operative coaching (OC) model on general surgery chief residents’ operative efficiency (OE) measured by operative times. We hypothesized that higher levels of entrustment surgeons intend to offer resident in future similar cases are associated with improved OE. Materials and Methods From July 2018 to June 2019, we used a validated instrument to score prospective resident entrustment in 228 evaluations of 6 chief residents during 12 OC sessions each (3 lap colectomy, 3 lap cholecystectomy, 3 ventral hernia, 3 inguinal hernia). Operative times of matched case CPT codes performed by coached chiefs (N = 500) were matched via CPT code to the cases of uncoached chiefs in the academic year 2016-2017 (N = 478). Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA. Results Prospective entrustment scores from coached chief residents were associated with significantly shorter operative times in matched complex cases (CC) (r = −0.58, p = 0.0047). A similar trend was observed in noncomplex cases (NCC) (r = −0.29, p = 0.18). Compared to the historical cohort, coached chief residents showed a decrease in mean operative time during complex cases (p = 0.0008, d = 0.44), but an increase in mean operative times for noncomplex cases (p Conclusions An OC model improves chief residents’ prospective entrustment leading to increased OE in cases with greater levels of operative complexity, showing a decrease in mean operative time compared to uncoached residents in certain procedures. This is the first report showing formal coaching may be a method to enhance chief resident OE.

Operative coaching offers a unique opportunity to strengthen surgery residents' skill sets and practice readiness. However, institutional organizational capacity may influence the ability to successfully implement and sustain a coaching program. This review concentrates on the implementation requirements as they relate to institutional organizational capacity to help evaluate and determine if adopting such a coaching model is feasible. We searched English-language, peer-reviewed articles concerning operative coaching of general surgery residents between 2000 and 2020 with the MEDLINE database. The abstracts of 267 identified articles were further screened based on the presence of 2 inclusion criteria: general surgery residents and operative coaching. Then we summarized the reported implementation requirements. Findings revealed the implementation requirements (ie people, processes, technology/support resources, physical resources, and organizational systems) of 3 major types of resident operative coaching models were different. Video-assisted coaching faces the most barriers to implementation followed by video-based coaching; in-person coaching encounters the least barriers. Six questions are generated helping residency education leaders assess their readiness for an operative coaching program. Evaluation of the implementation requirements of a desired coaching program using the 5 organizational capacity elements is recommended to ensure the residency's ability to achieve a successful and sustainable program.

Background Academic medical centers have increasingly adopted productivity-based compensation models for faculty. The potential exists for conflict between financial incentives and the quality of surgical resident education. This study aims to examine surgical residents’ perceptions regarding the impact of productivity-based compensation on education. Methods Following implementation of a productivity-based compensation plan, a survey of surgical residents (general surgery, plastic surgery, otolaryngology, urology, orthopedic surgery, and neurosurgery) was conducted to examine perceptions of its impact on didactics, patient care, surgical technique, teaching in the operating room, and financial considerations. Survey data were prospectively collected and analyzed. A retrospective analysis of relative value units (RVUs) was also performed. Results Following implementation of the productivity-based compensation plan, annual work RVUs increased by 8.9% in surgery as a whole, with increases observed within all surgical subspecialties. A total of 100 surveys were sent and 35 were completed (35% response rate and at least 30% within each surgical subspecialty). Forty-nine percent of participants perceived an increased focus on clinical productivity by faculty. Thirty-seven percent reported learning more about RVUs and Current Procedural Terminology coding. Most residents reported that the compensation plan did not have an impact on their education with respect to didactics (77%), patient care (94%), surgical technique (97%), and teaching in the operating room (83%). Conclusions Increased clinical productivity in the setting of an RVU-based compensation plan was not perceived by most surgical residents to have impacted their education. In some cases, this model may enhance education in relation to RVUs, Current Procedural Terminology coding, and the financial aspects of surgery.

To describe the first year of the Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) DESIGN: The Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) was formed by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) in 2018 as a continuous educational quality improvement program. Over 18 months, thirteen discrete goals for the establishment of EQIP were refined and executed through a collaborative effort involving leaders in surgical education. Alpha and beta pilots were conducted to refine the data queries and collection processes. A highly-secure, doubly-deidentified database was created for the ingestion of resident and program data.36 surgical training programs with 1264 trainees and 1500 faculty members were included in the dataset. 51,516 ERAS applications to programs were also included. Uni- and multi-variable analysis was then conducted.EQIP was successfully deployed within the timeline described in 2020. Data from the ACGME, ABS, and ERAS were merged with manually entered data by programs and successfully ingested into the EQIP database. Interactive dashboards have been constructed for use by programs to compare to the national cohort. Risk-adjusted multivariable analysis suggests that increased time in a technical skills lab was associated with increased success on the ABS's Qualifying Examination, alone. Increased time in a technical skills lab and the presence of a formal teaching curriculum were associated with increased success on both the ABS's Qualifying and Certifying Examination. Program type may be of some consequence in predicting success on the Qualifying Examination.The APDS has proved the concept that a highly secure database for the purpose of continuous risk-adjusted quality improvement in surgical education can be successfully deployed. EQIP will continue to improve and hopes to include an increasing number of programs as the barriers to participation are overcome.

Use of robotic-assisted surgery is increasing, and resident involvement may lead to higher costs. We investigated whether senior resident involvement in noncomplex robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and inguinal hernia (RIH) would take more time and cost more when compared to non-robotic cholecystectomy (NRC) and inguinal hernia repair (NRIH).We extracted surgery duration and total cost of NRC, NRIH, RC, and RIH from 7/2016 to 6/2020 with senior resident (PGY4-5) involvement. We excluded complex cases as well as prisoner cases and those with new faculty and research residents. We assessed differences between robotic and non-robotic cases in surgery duration and total cost per minute, using one-way ANOVA.We included 1608 cases (non-robotic 1145 vs. robotic 463). On average, RC cases with a senior resident took less time than NRC (179.4 185.8, p = 0.401); surgery duration of RIH cases was similar with NRIH cases. The total cost per minute of RC cases with a senior resident on average was $9.30 higher than NRC cases for each minute incurred in the operating room but did not lead to a significant change in overall cost. RIH cases, on the other hand, cost less per minute than NRIH cases (114.1 126.5, p = 0.399).Training in robotic surgery is important. Noncomplex RC and RIH involving senior residents were not significantly longer nor did they incur significantly more cost than non-robotic procedures. Senior resident training in noncomplex robotic surgery can be efficient and can be included in the residency curriculum.

Introduction The goal of this study was to explore the resident construct for their perceived successful method of actions that lead to OR autonomy during residency and the strategies they employed. Methods We conducted focus group interviews with residents from the General Surgery (GS) and Obstetrics & Gynecology (OBGYN) departments at a single academic institution across all clinical postgraduate years (PGY) using convenience sampling. Audio recordings of each interview were transcribed, analyzed and emergent themes were identified using a framework method. Results A total of 38 residents participated. A 3-stage resident method to gain operative autonomy emerged. This progresses from building rapport, developing mutual entrustment, and finally to obtaining autonomy. We identified 4 common strategies used by residents to construct this method: smart communication, attention to attending preferences, helpful allies and visible attributes. Conclusion Our findings provide insight into resident strategies to achieve progressive autonomy in the OR helping programs improve resident’s learning efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Most general surgery residents pursue fellowship; there is limited understanding of the impact residents and fellows have on each other’s education. The goal of this exploratory survey was to identify these impacts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical residents and fellows at a single academic institution were surveyed regarding areas (OR assignments, the educational focus of the team, roles and responsibilities on the team, interpersonal communication, call, “other”) hypothesized to be impacted by other learners. Impact was defined as “something that persistently affects the clinical learning environment and a trainee’s education or ability to perform their job”. Narrative responses were reviewed until dominant themes were identified. RESULTS: Twenty-three residents (23/45, 51%) and 12 fellows (12/21, 57%) responded. Responses were well distributed among resident year (PGY-1:17% [4/23], PGY-2, 35% [8/23], PGY-3 26% [6/23], PGY-4 9% [2/23%], PGY-5 13% [3/23]). Most residents reported OR assignment (14/23, 61%) as the area of primary impact, fellows broadly reported organizational categories (Roles and responsibilities 33%, educational focus 16%, interpersonal communication 16%). Senior residents reported missing out on operations to fellows while junior residents reported positive impacts of operating directly with fellows. Residents of all levels reported that fellows positively contributed to their education. Fellows, senior residents, and junior residents reported positive experiences when residents and fellows operated together as primary surgeon and assistant. CONCLUSIONS: Residents and fellows impact one another’s education both positively and negatively. Case allocation concerns senior residents, operating together may alleviate this, providing a positive experience for all trainees. Defining a unique educational role for fellows and delineating team expectations may maximize the positive impacts in this relationship.

Using the platform of morbidity and mortality conference, we developed and executed a combined faculty-resident intervention called "Education MM" to discuss challenges faced by both parties in the operating room (OR), identify realistic solutions, and implement action plans. This study aimed to investigate the impact of this intervention on resident OR training.Two resident case presentations were followed by audience discussion and recommendations regarding actionable solutions aimed at improving resident OR training from an expert faculty panel. Postintervention surveys were completed by participants immediately and 2 mo later to assess perceived short and long-term impact on OR teaching and/or learning and the execution of two recommended solutions. Descriptive statistical analysis was applied.Immediate post-intervention surveys (n = 44) indicated that 81.8% of participants enjoyed the MM "a lot"; 90.1% said they would use some or a lot of the ideas presented. Awareness of OR teaching/learning challenges before and after the MM improved from 3.0 to 3.7 (P = 0.00001) for faculty and 3.0 to 3.9 for trainees (P = 0.00004). Understanding of OR teaching and/or learning approaches improved from 3.1 to 3.7 for faculty (P = 0.00004) and 2.7 to 3.9 for trainees (P = 0.00001). In 2-mo post-intervention surveys, most residents had experienced two recommended solutions (71% and 88%) in the OR, but self-reported changes to faculty behavior did not reach statistical significance.A department-wide education MM could be an effective approach to enhance mutual communication between faculty members and residents around OR teaching/learning by identifying program-specific challenges and potential actionable solutions.

Postoperative ileus (POI) and postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (POGD) are well-known complications affecting patients undergoing intestinal surgery. GI symptoms include nausea, vomiting, pain, abdominal distention, bloating, and constipation. These iatrogenic disorders are associated with extended hospitalizations, increased morbidity, and health care costs into the billions and current therapeutic strategies are limited. This is a narrative review focused on recent concepts in the pathogenesis of POI and POGD, pipeline drugs or approaches to treatment. Mechanisms, cellular targets and pathways implicated in the pathogenesis include gut surgical manipulation and surgical trauma, neuroinflammation, reactive enteric glia, macrophages, mast cells, monocytes, neutrophils and ICC’s. The precise interactions between immune, inflammatory, neural and glial cells are not well understood. Reactive enteric glial cells are an emerging therapeutic target that is under intense investigation for enteric neuropathies, GI dysmotility and POI. Our review emphasizes current therapeutic strategies, starting with the implementation of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to protect against POI and POGD. However, despite colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery, it remains a significant medical problem and burden on the healthcare system. Over 100 pipeline drugs or treatments are listed in Clin.Trials.gov. These include 5HT4R agonists (Prucalopride and TAK 954), vagus nerve stimulation of the ENS—macrophage nAChR cholinergic pathway, acupuncture, herbal medications, peripheral acting opioid antagonists (Alvimopen, Methlnaltexone, Naldemedine), anti-bloating/flatulence drugs (Simethiocone), a ghreline prokinetic agonist (Ulimovelin), drinking coffee, and nicotine chewing gum. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms for short and long-term outcomes is necessary before we can develop better prophylactic and treatment strategies.

Background Prospective resident entrustment (i.e., trust an attending surgeon intends to give to a resident in the near future) in the operating room (OR) closely associates with granted future autonomy. However, the process of determining resident entrustment takes time and effort. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of granting incremental resident entrustment for upcoming surgical cases. Methods We analyzed prospective resident entrustment of 6 chief residents in 76 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, ventral hernia, and inguinal hernia scored by attending surgeon, resident, and a surgeon observer. Matched direct costs and operative time were extracted from hospital billing. We assessed the efficiency of granting incremental prospective resident entrustment with direct cost per minute incurred in the evaluated case. Effect size was computed to assess the differences between groups. Results Sixty-three cases (82.9%) were matched; 47.6% (30/63) of matched cases received prospective resident entrustment score ≥ 4. The direct cost per minute increased in three procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, and ventral hernia) with increased intention of granting incremental resident entrustment. Inguinal hernia was the only procedure in which chiefs were entrusted with future independence while the direct cost per minute decreased. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate more time and effort are required (except for inguinal hernia) for residents to be entrusted with increased independence in the future. Faculty and resident development programs are recommended to improve the efficiency of the process of granting incremental operative entrustment to optimize resident training quality and cost of care delivery.

Introduction Entrustment is a key component connecting to resident preparedness for surgical practice in the operating room (OR). Residents’ self-entrustment of their surgical competencies closely associates with their OR training experience and granted autonomy. Some recent studies have investigated how attending surgeons entrusted residents in the OR. There is little to no data, however, in examining these issues from the resident perspective. The goal of this study was to identify the perception and expectations of autonomy from residents’ perspective, as well as the self-entrustment of their surgical competencies in obstetrics (OB) and gynecologic (GYN) procedures. Methods Focus group interviews of OB/GYN residents were performed. Residents were selected by convenience sampling. Audio recordings of each interview were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified, using a framework method. Results A total of 123 minutes of interviews were recorded. Eight junior residents (PGY1-2) and 12 senior residents (PGY3-4) participated. Our data illustrated that (1) the perception of autonomy shifted significantly throughout residency training; (2) residents demonstrated higher expectations and self-entrustment for OB surgical procedures than for GYN surgical procedures upon graduation; and (3) case volume, modalities of OR teaching and mutual communication are 3 factors influencing resident self-entrustment of their surgical competencies. Conclusions Residents showed disparities in their self-entrustment and expectations of autonomy between OB and GYN surgical procedures. Better understanding these differences and the 3 influencing factors could help programs develop a potential solution for improvement in resident entrustment and autonomy upon graduation.

Background In 2012, the Ohio State University College of Medicine (OSUCOM) implemented a new undergraduate medical curriculum. We compare outcomes of a third year traditional clerkship format to a combined Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynecology ‘ring’. Methods Performance outcomes of 4 consecutive classes were compared between pre- (2014, 2015) and post-curricular revision (2016, 2017). Results Three hundred ninety-one students consented use of their educational data for research. We examined medical knowledge (NBME scores, USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores) and student satisfaction between pre- and post-curricular revision. Results demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the Obstetrics/Gynecology NBME shelf examination. Surgery NBME and USMLE Step 2 scores were increased and statistically significant but satisfaction of both disciplines was higher pre-curricular revision. Conclusion Medical knowledge outcomes in this combined ’ring’ were similar to or higher than performance in previous years'. Future analyses are needed to assess the impact of OSUCOM curricular revision.

Purpose: The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is critical to the development of colorectal cancers, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations foster resistance to radiation. We performed a phase I trial to determine the safety of trametinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor, with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were enrolled on a phase I study with 3+3 study design, with an expansion cohort of 9 patients at the MTD. Following a 5-day trametinib lead-in, with pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies, patients received trametinib and CRT, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Trametinib was given orally daily at 3 dose levels: 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg. CRT consisted of infusional 5-FU 225 mg/m2/day and radiation dose of 28 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy (total 50.4 Gy). The primary endpoint was to identify the MTD and recommended phase II dose. IHC staining for phosphorylated ERK (pERK) and genomic profiling was performed on the tumor samples. Results: Patients were enrolled to all dose levels, and 18 patients were evaluable for toxicities and responses. Treatment was well tolerated, and there was one dose-limiting toxicity of diarrhea, which was attributed to CRT rather than trametinib. At the 2 mg dose level, 25% had pathologic complete response. IHC staining confirmed dose-dependent decrease in pERK with increasing trametinib doses. Conclusions: The combination of trametinib with 5-FU CRT is safe and well tolerated, and may warrant additional study in a phase II trial, perhaps in a RAS/RAF-mutant selected population.

OBJECTIVES Surgical resection for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma commonly occurs 6 to 10 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). We sought to determine the optimal timing of surgery related to the pathologic complete response rate and survival endpoints. METHODS The study is a retrospective analysis of 92 patients treated with nCRT followed by surgery from 2004 to 2011 at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of timing of surgery on locoregional control, distant failure (DF), disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Time-to-surgery was ≤8 weeks (group A) in 72% (median 6.1 wk) and >8 weeks (group B) in 28% (median 8.9 wk) of patients. No significant differences in patient characteristics, locoregional control, or pathologic complete response rates were noted between the groups. Univariate analysis revealed that group B had significantly shorter time to DF (group B, median 33 mo; group A, median not reached, P=0.047) and shorter OS compared with group A (group B, median 52 mo; group A, median not reached, P=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that increased time-to-surgery showed a significant increase in DF (HR=2.96, P=0.02) and trends toward worse OS (HR=2.81, P=0.108) and disease-free survival (HR=2.08, P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS We found that delaying surgical resection longer than 8 weeks after nCRT was associated with an increased risk of DF. This study, in combination with a recent larger study, questions the recent trend in promoting surgical delay beyond the traditional 6 to 10 weeks. Larger, prospective databases or randomized studies may better clarify surgical timing following nCRT in rectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND Given the conflicting nature of reported risk factors for post-discharge venous thromboembolism (VTE) and unclear guidelines for post-discharge pharmacoprophylaxis, we sought to determine risk factors for 30-day post-discharge VTE after colectomy to predict which patients will benefit from post-discharge pharmacoprophylaxis. METHODS Patients who underwent colectomy in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Participant Use Files from 2011 to 2015 were identified. Logistic regression modeling was used. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used and the best cut-points were determined using Youden's J index (sensitivity + specificity - 1). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to test model calibration. A random sample of 30% of the cohort was used as a validation set. RESULTS Among 77,823 cases, the overall incidence of VTE after colectomy was 1.9%, with 0.7% of VTE events occurring in the post-discharge setting. Factors associated with post-discharge VTE risk including body mass index, preoperative albumin, operation time, hospital length of stay, race, smoking status, inflammatory bowel disease, return to the operating room and postoperative ileus were included in logistic regression equation model. The model demonstrated good calibration (goodness of fit P = 0.7137) and good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.68; validation set, AUC = 0.70). A score of ≥-5.00 had the maxim sensitivity and specificity, resulting in 36.63% of patients being treated with prophylaxis for an overall VTE risk of 0.67%. CONCLUSION Approximately one-third of post-colectomy VTE events occurred after discharge. Patients with predicted post-discharge VTE risk of ≥-5.00 should be recommended for extended post-discharge VTE prophylaxis.

Background While bundled payments aim to reduce variations in health care spending across the continuum of care, data reporting on variations in payments for privately insured patients undergoing treatment for colon cancer (CC) are lacking. The current study sought to characterize variations in payments received for the treatment of CC using a cohort of commercially insured patients. Methods Patients who underwent a colectomy for CC were identified using the MarketScan Database for 2010-2014. Multivariable regression analysis was used to calculate and compare risk-adjusted payments between patients. Results A total of 18,337 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. The median risk-adjusted payment for surgery was $26,408 (IQR: $19,193-$38,037) ranging from $19,762 (IQR: $15,595-$25,636) among patients in the lowest quartile of payments to $33,809 (IQR: $24,783-$48,254) for patients in the highest (+△71.1%). The median risk-adjusted payment for chemotherapy was $70,090 (IQR: $57,813-$83,216); compared with patients in the lowest quartile of payments, payments associated with chemotherapy were 40.4% higher among patients in the highest quartile of payments (Q1 versus Q4: $56,827 [IQR: 49,173-65,353] versus $79,801 [IQR: 67,270-90,999]). When stratified by treatment type, patients in the highest two quartiles of risk-adjusted payments accounted for a total of 58.5% of all payments, whereas patients in the lower two quartiles of risk-adjusted payments accounted for only 41.5% of all payments. A younger patient age, increasing patient comorbidity and undergoing an open operation were associated with higher overall payments. Conclusions Wide variations in payments exist for the treatment for colon cancer. Episode-based bundle payments for surgery and chemotherapy may differentially impact reimbursement for CC.

BACKGROUND Treating patients with breast cancer is multidisciplinary; however, it is unclear whether surgery residency programs provide sufficient training in multidisciplinary care. Self-efficacy is one way of measuring the adequacy of training. Our goal was to develop a method of assessing self-efficacy in multidisciplinary breast cancer care. METHODS Based on a literature review and subject-matter expert input, we developed a 30-item self-efficacy survey to measure six domains of breast cancer care (genetics, surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, and radiology). We constructed and validated the survey using a seven-step survey development framework. The survey was administered to general surgery residents at a single academic surgical residency. RESULTS Response rate was 66% (n = 31). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach alpha = 0.92). Self-efficacy was moderate (mean = 3.05) and tended to increase with training (postgraduate year [PGY] 1: mean= 2.37 versus PGY 5: mean= 3.54; P

Minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) closure of end stomas is a safe and viable option in the hands of experienced surgeons and appropriately selected patients. As in all planned two-part operations, the success of the second operation is greatly influenced by the first operation. This chapter focuses on aspects of the first operation that can be modified to make minimally invasive stoma closure more successful.

Objective Developing resident autonomy in the operating room is a complex process and resident established case specific learning goals may increase resident operating room training efficiency. However, little is understood about residents’ experience identifying learning goals for a given case. The aim of this study was to explore the essential components contributing to surgery residents’ identification of specific learning goals for surgical cases. Design We conducted focus group interviews with general surgery residents across all post-graduate years (PGY) through convenience sampling. Audio recordings of each interview were transcribed and iteratively analyzed. Emerging themes were identified using a framework method. Setting The study was conducted within the Department of General Surgery at the Ohio State University Medical Center, a tertiary academic medical center. Participants Eight junior (PGY 1-2) and 10 senior (PGY 3-5) residents participated, of whom 10 were female and 8 were male. Results On average, each focus group interview lasted 57.00 (SD ± 12.99) minutes. Three essential components of residents’ creation of case-specific learning goals emerged from the focus group interviews: medical knowledge, surgical experience and entrustment. Residents require baseline knowledge and surgical experience with an operation to identify the learning goal they would aim to execute. They also require entrustment of themselves and support of the attending to accomplish the case specific learning goal. Differences in the possession of these three components would likely influence differences in the ability to create learning goals between junior and senior residents. Conclusions Medical knowledge, surgical experience and entrustment are 3 factors that are imperative to the creation of a resident's case specific learning goal. The complex combination of these three components contributes to the building of the learning goal prior to the start of the operation. Elucidating these aspects provides additional information for targeted interventions in the future.

Background The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the validity of the new surgical entrustable professional activities (SEPAs) instruments. Methods A prospective evaluation of six procedure-specific SEPAs instruments derived from the validated OPRS evaluation tools was conducted in 2018. Each instrument includes an open-ended feedback item and a series of Likert-Scale rating items. Attending, resident and a constant 3rd surgeon-observer completed the same evaluation for the observed case within 3 days of each evaluated operation. Results 40 cases performed by 10 residents and 11 attending surgeons were observed and evaluated. The SEPAs instruments were supported by strong validity evidence. Factor analysis revealed three latent variables are consistent with the core construct of SEPAs instrument. Internal reliability was high with Cronbach's α ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 across the six procedures. Test-retest reliability varied from 0.74 to 0.93 in the study sample. Conclusions The SEPAs instruments are reliable and valid tools for assessment of crucial aspects of resident learning and surgical entrustable professional activities that lead to entrustment and eventually surgical autonomy.

Background Information on procedure volume of graduating chief residents (GCRs) for hepato-pancreato-biliary(HPB) surgical procedures may inform assessments of resident training. This study sought to characterize trends in operative volumes over a 19-year period to define the degree to which general surgery residents gain exposure to HPB procedures during training. Methods The ACGME was queried for all HPB operations performed by GCR between 2000-2018. Total procedures as well as means and fold change was calculated and reported for each year. Results Between 2000–2018, the number of general surgery residency programs varied between 240 and 254. A total of 411,383 HPB procedures (36.2% liver, 42.8% pancreas, 21% complex biliary) were performed by 22,229 GCR. Each year of the study, GCR had similar mean number total procedures:liver 7.4, pancreas 8.7, and complex biliary 4.4. For liver procedures there was no difference in the fold change over time, however for pancreas there was an increase in the fold change from 2.25 to 3.25. Conclusion Most GCRs are graduating with a low number of HPB procedures and trends suggesting a decrease in the mean number of procedures per GCR and an increasing variability among residents.

BACKGROUND: Clinical observations or animal studies implicate enteric glial cells in motility disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal (GI) infections, postoperative ileus, and slow transit constipation. Mechanisms underlying glial responses to inflammation in human GI tract are not understood. Our goal was to identify the "reactive human enteric glial cell (rhEGC) phenotype" induced by inflammation, and probe its functional relevance. METHODS: Human enteric glial cells in culture from 15 GI-surgical specimens were used to study gene expression, Ca, and purinergic signaling by Ca/fluo-4 imaging and mechanosensitivity. A nanostring panel of 107 genes was designed as a read out of inflammation, transcription, purinergic signaling, vesicular transport protein, channel, antioxidant, and other pathways. A 24-hour treatment with lipopolysaccharide (200 μg/mL) and interferon-γ (10 μg/mL) was used to induce inflammation and study molecular signaling, flow-dependent Ca responses from 3 mL/min to 10 mL/min, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release, and ATP responses. RESULTS: Treatment induced a "rhEGC phenotype" and caused up-regulation in messenger RNA transcripts of 58% of 107 genes analyzed. Regulated genes included inflammatory genes (54%/IP10; IFN-γ; CxCl2; CCL3; CCL2; C3; s100B; IL-1β; IL-2R; TNF-α; IL-4; IL-6; IL-8; IL-10; IL-12A; IL-17A; IL-22; and IL-33), purine-genes (52%/AdoR2A; AdoR2B; P2RY1; P2RY2; P2RY6; P2RX3; P2RX7; AMPD3; ENTPD2; ENTPD3; and NADSYN1), channels (40%/Panx1; CHRNA7; TRPV1; and TRPA1), vesicular transporters (SYT1, SYT2, SNAP25, and SYP), transcription factors (relA/relB, SOCS3, STAT3, GATA_3, and FOXP3), growth factors (IGFBP5 and GMCSF), antioxidant genes (SOD2 and HMOX1), and enzymes (NOS2; TPH2; and CASP3) (P < 0.0001). Treatment disrupted Ca signaling, ATP, and mechanical/flow-dependent Ca responses in human enteric glial cells. ATP release increased 5-fold and s100B decreased 33%. CONCLUSIONS: The "rhEGC phenotype" is identified by a complex cascade of pro-inflammatory pathways leading to alterations of important molecular and functional signaling pathways (Ca, purinergic, and mechanosensory) that could disrupt GI motility. Inflammation induced a "purinergic switch" from ATP to adenosine diphosphate/adenosine/uridine triphosphate signaling. Findings have implications for GI infection, inflammatory bowel disease, postoperative ileus, motility, and GI disorders.