Search

Next-generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR

Epigenetic allele diversity is linked to inferior prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the source of epiallele heterogeneity in AML is unknown. Herein we analyzed epiallele diversity in a genetically and clinically annotated AML cohort. Notably, AML driver mutations linked to transcription factors and favorable outcome are associated with epigenetic destabilization in a defined set of susceptible loci. In contrast, AML subtypes linked to inferior prognosis manifest greater abundance and highly stochastic epiallele patterning. We report an epiallele outcome classifier supporting the link between epigenetic diversity and treatment failure. Mouse models with TET2 or IDH2 mutations show that epiallele diversity is especially strongly induced by IDH mutations, precedes transformation to AML, and is enhanced by cooperation between somatic mutations. Furthermore, epiallele complexity was partially reversed by epigenetic therapies in AML driven by TET2/IDH2, suggesting that epigenetic therapy might function in part by reducing population complexity and fitness of AMLs.Significance:We show for the first time that epigenetic clonality is directly linked to specific mutations and that epigenetic allele diversity precedes and potentially contributes to malignant transformation. Furthermore, epigenetic clonality is reversible with epigenetic therapy agents.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1775

Supplementary Figures S1-S6

Frequency of recurrent mutations in the AML cohort

MSigDB curated gene set enrichment analysis for AML subtype-specific eloci

Supplementary Figure S1. Response of Tet2-/- Flt3ITD leukemia model to 5-Aza therapy Tet2-/-Flt3ITD leukemia model treated with vehicle or 5-Aza (n=5). Supplementary Figure S2. Idh2R140QFlt3ITD leukemia model phenotype. Supplementary Figure S3. Idh2R140QFlt3ITD leukemia model treatment response to AG-221 Idh2R140QFlt3ITD leukemia model treated with vehicle or AG-221 (n=6). Supplementary Figure S4. Genomic methylation analysis of Idh2R140Q Flt3ITD leukemia model response to AG-221 therapy. Supplementary Figure S5. GSEA analysis of 5-Aza and AG-221 response. Supplementary Figure S6. Response of Tet2-/-Flt3ITD leukemia model to 5-Aza and AC220 therapy. Supplementary Figure S7. Idh2R140QFlt3ITD and Tet2-/-Flt3ITD leukemia model response to combination therapy. Supplementary Figure S8. Methylation and expression response of Tet2-/-Flt3ITD and Idh2R140QFlt3ITD leukemia model to combination therapy. Supplementary Figure S9. Response of Tet2-/- Flt3ITD and Idh2R140QFlt3ITD leukemia model to combination therapy.

Supplemental Methods. DNA constructs, Gel electrophoresis and western blotting, Metabolite extraction and analysis

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers.Significance:Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

Supplementary Methods, Figure Legends

Somatic mutations in cytosolic or mitochondrial isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 or IDH2, respectively) contribute to oncogenesis via production of the metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Isoform-selective IDH inhibitors suppress 2HG production and induce clinical responses in patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mutant malignancies. Despite the promising activity of IDH inhibitors, the mechanisms that mediate resistance to IDH inhibition are poorly understood. Here, we describe four clinical cases that identify mutant IDH isoform switching, either from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, as a mechanism of acquired clinical resistance to IDH inhibition in solid and liquid tumors.Significance:IDH-mutant cancers can develop resistance to isoform-selective IDH inhibition by “isoform switching” from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, thereby restoring 2HG production by the tumor. These findings underscore a role for continued 2HG production in tumor progression and suggest therapeutic strategies to prevent or overcome resistance.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

Supplementary Methods, Figure S1-16, Table S1, S4-7, S9

Supplementary Table S1. List of Synergy Genes. Supplementary Table S2. A, Statistical testing of DMCs identified in combination therapy compared to single treatment. B, Differentially methylated CpGs in response to combination therapy.

Figures S1 through S4

Purpose: We investigated the molecular effect of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in vivo on all available tumors from patients treated on North American Brain Tumor Consortium trials 01-03 and 00-01 for recurrent or progressive malignant glioma.Experimental Design: EGFR expression and signaling during treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib were analyzed by Western blot and compared with pre–erlotinib/gefitinib–exposed tissue or unexposed controls. Tumors were also analyzed for EGFR mutations and for other genomic abnormalities by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clinical data were used to associate molecular features with tumor sensitivity to erlotinib or gefitinib.Results: Erlotinib and gefitinib did not markedly affect EGFR activity in vivo. No lung signature mutations of EGFR exons 18 to 21 were observed. There was no clear association between erlotinib/gefitinib sensitivity and deletion or amplification events on array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis, although novel genomic changes were identified.Conclusions: As erlotinib and gefitinib were generally ineffective at markedly inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation in these tumors, other assays may be needed to detect molecular effects. Additionally, the mechanism of erlotinib/gefitinib sensitivity likely differs between brain and lung tumors. Finally, novel genomic changes, including deletions of chromosomes 6, 21, and 22, represent new targets for further research.

Supplementary Table Legend from Molecular Study of Malignant Gliomas Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors: Tissue Analysis from North American Brain Tumor Consortium Trials 01-03 and 00-01

Supplementary Table 1 from Molecular Study of Malignant Gliomas Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors: Tissue Analysis from North American Brain Tumor Consortium Trials 01-03 and 00-01

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), p53 tumor suppressor activity can be reduced due to enhanced expression of MDM2 which promotes the degradation of p53. In TP53 wild-type malignancies, therapy with small molecule antagonists of MDM2 results in antileukemic activity. Current treatment strategies, however, have been limited by poor tolerability and incomplete clinical activity. We have developed a proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) MS3227 that targets MDM2 by recruiting the E3 ligase Von Hippel-Lindau, resulting in proteasome-dependent degradation of MDM2. In WT TP53 leukemia cell lines, MS3227 led to activation of p53 targets p21, PUMA, and MDM2 and resulted in cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and decreased viability. The catalytic PROTAC MS3227 led to more potent activation when compared to a stoichiometric inhibitor, in part by dampening the negative feedback mechanism in the p53 - MDM2 circuit. The effectiveness of MS3227 was also observed in primary patient specimens with selectivity towards leukemic blasts. The addition of MS3227 enhanced the activity of other anti-leukemic agents including azacytidine, cytarabine, and venetoclax. In particular, MS3227 treatment was shown to downregulate MCL-1, a known mediator of resistance to venetoclax. A PROTAC-based approach may provide a means of improving MDM2 inhibition to gain greater therapeutic potential in AML.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, such as polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, are bone marrow disorders that result in the overproduction of mature clonal myeloid elements. Identification of recurrent genetic mutations has been described and aid in diagnosis and prognostic determination. Mouse models of these mutations have confirmed the biologic significance of these mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasm disease biology and provided greater insights on the pathways that are dysregulated with each mutation. The models are useful tools that have led to preclinical testing and provided data as validation for future myeloproliferative neoplasm clinical trials.

Epigenetic allele diversity is linked to inferior prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the source of epiallele heterogeneity in AML is unknown. Herein we analyzed epiallele diversity in a genetically and clinically annotated AML cohort. Notably, AML driver mutations linked to transcription factors and favorable outcome are associated with epigenetic destabilization in a defined set of susceptible loci. In contrast, AML subtypes linked to inferior prognosis manifest greater abundance and highly stochastic epiallele patterning. We report an epiallele outcome classifier supporting the link between epigenetic diversity and treatment failure. Mouse models with TET2 or IDH2 mutations show that epiallele diversity is especially strongly induced by IDH mutations, precedes transformation to AML, and is enhanced by cooperation between somatic mutations. Furthermore, epiallele complexity was partially reversed by epigenetic therapies in AML driven by TET2/IDH2, suggesting that epigenetic therapy might function in part by reducing population complexity and fitness of AMLs. Significance: We show for the first time that epigenetic clonality is directly linked to specific mutations and that epigenetic allele diversity precedes and potentially contributes to malignant transformation. Furthermore, epigenetic clonality is reversible with epigenetic therapy agents. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1775

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers. Significance: Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in combination with venetoclax have been widely adopted as the standard of care for patients who cannot tolerate induction chemotherapy and for patients who have relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients with AML (n = 65) or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 7) who received the combination of HMA and venetoclax at our institution. Outcomes measured included complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Patient mutational profiles and transfusion requirements were also assessed. Of 26 newly diagnosed AML patients, the CR/CRi rate was 53.8%. The median DOR and OS were 6.9 months and not reached, respectively. Of 39 R/R AML patients, the CR/CRi rate was 38.5%. The median DOR and OS were both 8.1 months. Responders to HMA and venetoclax were enriched for TET2, IDH1, and IDH2 mutations, while nonresponders were associated with FLT3 and RAS mutations. Adaptive resistance was observed through various mechanisms including acquired RAS pathway mutations. Of transfusion-dependent patients, 12.2% and 15.2% achieved red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion independence, respectively, while 44.8% and 35.1% of RBC and platelet transfusion independent patients, respectively, became transfusion dependent. In total 59.1% of patients developed a ≥grade 3 infection and 46.5% neutropenic fever. HMA + venetoclax can lead to impressive response rates with moderately durable remissions and survival. However, the benefits of this combination are diminished by the significant toxicities from infection, persistent cytopenias, and transfusion requirements.

Somatic mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 gene (IDH2) contribute to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) through the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG)1–8. Enasidenib (AG-221) is an allosteric inhibitor that binds to the IDH2 dimer interface and blocks the production of 2HG by IDH2 mutants9,10. In a phase I/II clinical trial, enasidenib inhibited the production of 2HG and induced clinical responses in relapsed or refractory IDH2-mutant AML11. Here we describe two patients with IDH2-mutant AML who had a clinical response to enasidenib followed by clinical resistance, disease progression, and a recurrent increase in circulating levels of 2HG. We show that therapeutic resistance is associated with the emergence of second-site IDH2 mutations in trans, such that the resistance mutations occurred in the IDH2 allele without the neomorphic R140Q mutation. The in trans mutations occurred at glutamine 316 (Q316E) and isoleucine 319 (I319M), which are at the interface where enasidenib binds to the IDH2 dimer. The expression of either of these mutant disease alleles alone did not induce the production of 2HG; however, the expression of the Q316E or I319M mutation together with the R140Q mutation in trans allowed 2HG production that was resistant to inhibition by enasidenib. Biochemical studies predicted that resistance to allosteric IDH inhibitors could also occur via IDH dimer-interface mutations in cis, which was confirmed in a patient with acquired resistance to the IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib (AG-120). Our observations uncover a mechanism of acquired resistance to a targeted therapy and underscore the importance of 2HG production in the pathogenesis of IDH-mutant malignancies. A new mechanism of acquired clinical resistance in two patients with acute myeloid leukaemia driven by mutant IDH2 is described, in which a second-site mutation on the wild-type allele induces therapeutic resistance to IDH2 inhibitors.

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) frequently progress to bone marrow failure or acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and mutations in epigenetic regulators such as the metabolic enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) are associated with poor outcomes. Here, we showed that combined expression of Jak2V617Fand mutant IDH1R132Hor Idh2R140Q induces MPN progression, alters stem/progenitor cell function, and impairs differentiation in mice. Jak2V617FIdh2R140Q–mutant MPNs were sensitive to small-molecule inhibition of IDH. Combined inhibition of JAK2 and IDH2 normalized the stem and progenitor cell compartments in the murine model and reduced disease burden to a greater extent than was seen with JAK inhibition alone. In addition, combined JAK2 and IDH2 inhibitor treatment also reversed aberrant gene expression in MPN stem cells and reversed the metabolite perturbations induced by concurrent JAK2 and IDH2 mutations. Combined JAK2 and IDH2 inhibitor therapy also showed cooperative efficacy in cells from MPN patients with both JAK2mutand IDH2mutmutations. Taken together, these data suggest that combined JAK and IDH inhibition May offer a therapeutic advantage in this high-risk MPN subtype., Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2241-15), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Faculty Scholars Award), Stand Up To Cancer, National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (P50CA165962), National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (P30CA14051), Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research ( Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Bridge Project), Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of America. Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) Program, National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (grant U54OD020355-01), National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (grant NCI R01CA172636), National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (grant R35CA197594), National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008747).

Introduction Acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) are characterized by suppressed cell death pathways which promote leukemic blast survival. TP53 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in AML and is found mutated or deleted in 10-15% of patients. In a majority of cases though, TP53 is wild-type. Other mechanisms including MDM2 over-expression lead to reduced TP53 activity. MDM2 acts as a negative regulator by direct binding of TP53 and mediating TP53 degradation through ubiquitination. MDM2 itself is a transcriptional target of TP53 as a negative feedback mechanism limiting the function of TP53. Small molecule inhibition of MDM2 , blocking its ability to bind TP53, can activate TP53 and trigger cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through increased transcription of TP53 target genes. Increased MDM2 expression has been observed in hematologic malignancies including AML, providing rationale for clinical trials with MDM2 inhibitors. These agents such as RG7388 and AMG232 have shown efficacy as monotherapy and in combination. However, these agents have also exhibited toxicity and have yet to demonstrate sufficient benefit for their approval. To create more effective agents against MDM2, we have developed an MDM2 degrader XY-27 that functions as a proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC). Based on relatively higher expression in AML compared to other cancer types, we selected VHL as the E3 ubiquitin ligase target for XY-27 , as this may improve specificity and potency in AML. Results The PROTAC degrader XY-27 concurrently binds MDM2 and VHL, and by bringing these targets in proximity, VHL can then ubiquitinate MDM2, leading to its degradation by the proteasome. XY-27 can mediate degradation of MDM2 in a concentration dependent manner in the U937 leukemia cell line (Fig 1a). MDM2 degradation with XY-27 is blocked by proteasome inhibition and competitive binding of the VHL ligand. A control compound, which only differs in that it cannot bind to VHL, lacks degrader activity. Although MDM2 is itself an E3 ligase, VHL expression is not appreciably changed with XY-27 (Fig 1a). Treatment with XY-27 leads to apoptosis and decreased proliferation of leukemia cell lines in a TP53 dependent manner. Inhibition of MDM2 leads to up-regulation of TP53 and in TP53 wild-type cells, downstream targets CDKN1A (p21) and PUMA. MDM2 is also up-regulated through a feedback mechanism. XY-27 demonstrated greater potency than the MDM2-binding inhibitor AMG232 in the MOLM13 and MV4-11 leukemia cell lines (Fig 1b). Treatment with XY-27 led to higher levels of TP53 and p21 protein than with AMG232. CRISPR-mediated knock-out of VHL leads to reduced XY-27 potency. XY-27 also shows efficacy when combined with other chemotherapeutic agents such as azacytidine and cytarabine. In a long-term co-culture model with an OP9 feeder layer, XY-27 was capable of inducing apoptosis in primary patient AML samples (Fig 1c). Conclusion We describe a new MDM2 PROTAC, XY-27 that demonstrates TP53 dependent activity against leukemia cells. It also demonstrates increase potency compared to an MDM2 binding inhibitor. Utilization of the PROTAC system has potential advantages through selection of the VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase. Because of negative feedback mechanisms involving TP53 and MDM2, direct binding inhibitors of MDM2 may be limited in activity through continued accumulation of MDM2. PROTAC degraders have catalytic activity and may overcome this inhibition by continued degradation of the target MDM2, and thus achieve greater TP53 activity. Figure 1. Activity of the MDM2-PROTAC XY-27 in leukemia. (a) Western blot from treatment of U937 leukemia cells with XY-27 for 24 hrs, at various concentrations (5 nM to 1 μM), resulting in the degradation of MDM2. (b) Dose response curves from treatment of MOLM13 and MV4-11 cell lines with XY-27 (blue) and AMG232 (red) for 48 hrs, demonstrating greater potency of XY-27. (c) Induction of apoptosis in primary AML cells treated with XY-27 at 1μM using a co-culture system for 3 days. *p Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hoffman: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc.: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Genomic studies in acute myeloid leukemias (AML) have identified mutations that drive altered DNA methylation, including TET2 and IDH2. Here, we show that models of AML resulting from TET2 or IDH2 mutations combined with FLT3ITD mutations are sensitive to 5-azacytidine or to the IDH2 inhibitor AG-221, respectively. 5-azacytidine and AG-221 treatment induced an attenuation of aberrant DNA methylation and transcriptional output and resulted in a reduction in leukemic blasts consistent with antileukemic activity. These therapeutic benefits were associated with restoration of leukemic cell differentiation, and the normalization of hematopoiesis was derived from mutant cells. By contrast, combining AG-221 or 5-azacytidine with FLT3 inhibition resulted in a reduction in mutant allele burden, progressive recovery of normal hematopoiesis from non-mutant stem-progenitor cells, and reversal of dysregulated DNA methylation and transcriptional output. Together, our studies suggest combined targeting of signaling and epigenetic pathways can increase therapeutic response in AML. Significance: AMLs with mutations in TET2 or IDH2 are sensitive to epigenetic therapy through inhibition of DNA methyltransferase activity by 5-azacytidine or inhibition of mutant IDH2 through AG-221. These inhibitors induce a differentiation response and can be used to inform mechanism-based combination therapy. Cancer Discov; 7(5); 494–505. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Thomas and Majeti, p. 459. See related article by Yen et al., p. 478. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 443

Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease characterized by the proliferation of undifferentiated myeloid blasts, promoting bone marrow failure, infectious complications, and death. Progress in developing treatments for AML has been slow and clinical outcomes outside of bone marrow transplant are poor. A limitation to progress is the availability of reproducible murine models of AML. As such, there is a critical need to develop new models to quickly screen new therapeutics and treatment combinations. Here we have optimized the engraftment of a spontaneous Idh2R140Q/Flt3ITD murine AML (developed by Shih et al 2017) for rapid in vivo screening of compounds and combination strategies. Methods Spleen derived AML cells from a spontaneous Idh2R140Q/Flt3ITD murine AML were engrafted i.v. into NCG mice. Disease progression was monitored by flow cytometry and LC-MS/MS measurement of plasma D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D2HG), the product of mutant IDH2. At 1 week post-engraftment animals were enrolled onto treatment arms, which included enasidenib (IDH2), gilteritinib (Flt3), a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor, and combination arms. In follow-up studies, non-tumor bearing C57Bl/6 mice were treated with various doses of treatment combinations and blood counts, serum liver chemistry, and weight loss were used to evaluate toxicity. Results The time from engraftment to terminal disease can be precisely adjusted to experimental needs, enabling an aggressive 21-day disease course for rapid screening or a more protracted 1.5 month course that limits the initial number of cells required and allows for the testing of slower-acting differentiating agents. We show that enasidenib, gilteritinib, and a DHODH inhibitor all slow disease progression and prolong survival, and that DHODH inhibition may have a greater effect on survival than IDH2 inhibition. We also show that DHODH inhibition lowers plasma D2HG. Importantly, we identify that combining DHODH and IDH2 inhibition is untenable and results in lethal GI toxicity. This was validated in non-tumor bearing mice, where even low doses of DHODH/IDH2 inhibitors in combination resulted in cytopenias and rapid weight loss. Discussion Developing combination treatment regimens is likely to be key to achieving long-term remission for many AML patients; however, efforts to develop these combinations are often stymied by in vitro results that fail to translate to the in vivo setting, particularly unexpected toxicities that are not recognized in vitro. We show that our AML engraftment model can be used to identify and develop pre-clinical compounds and allow us to quickly identify and abandon treatment combinations that are toxic in vivo. Our hope is that this work enables the rapid identification and development of the best novel therapeutics and treatment combinations, such that valuable time and resources can be utilized to their greatest translational effect. Citation Format: Mariah L. Johnson, Ola A. Elgamal, Bonnie Harrington, Allison Mustonen, Amy Lehman, Chad Bennett, Kyle R. Dzwigalski, Kasey L. Hill, Mitch A. Phelps, Jean Truxall, Thomas Goodwin, Alan H. Shih, Ross L. Levine, Erin Hertlein, John C. Byrd. A primary mouse model of AML as a new way to screen novel therapeutics and treatment combinations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6118.

Somatic mutations in cytosolic or mitochondrial isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 or IDH2, respectively) contribute to oncogenesis via production of the metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Isoform-selective IDH inhibitors suppress 2HG production and induce clinical responses in patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mutant malignancies. Despite the promising activity of IDH inhibitors, the mechanisms that mediate resistance to IDH inhibition are poorly understood. Here, we describe four clinical cases that identify mutant IDH isoform switching, either from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, as a mechanism of acquired clinical resistance to IDH inhibition in solid and liquid tumors. Significance: IDH-mutant cancers can develop resistance to isoform-selective IDH inhibition by “isoform switching” from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, thereby restoring 2HG production by the tumor. These findings underscore a role for continued 2HG production in tumor progression and suggest therapeutic strategies to prevent or overcome resistance. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

Somatic mutations in cytosolic or mitochondrial isoforms of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 or IDH2, respectively) contribute to oncogenesis via production of the metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Isoform-selective IDH inhibitors suppress 2HG production and induce clinical responses in patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mutant malignancies. Despite the promising activity of IDH inhibitors, the mechanisms that mediate resistance to IDH inhibition are poorly understood. Here, we describe four clinical cases that identify mutant IDH isoform switching, either from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, as a mechanism of acquired clinical resistance to IDH inhibition in solid and liquid tumors.SignificanceIDH-mutant cancers can develop resistance to isoform-selective IDH inhibition by “isoform switching” from mutant IDH1 to mutant IDH2 or vice versa, thereby restoring 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) production by the tumor. These findings underscore a role for continued 2HG production in tumor progression and suggest therapeutic strategies to prevent or overcome resistance.

TET2 somatic mutations occur in ∼10% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) but are of unknown significance. Herein, we show that TET2 is required for the humoral immune response and is a DLBCL tumor suppressor. TET2 loss of function disrupts transit of B cells through germinal centers (GC), causing GC hyperplasia, impaired class switch recombination, blockade of plasma cell differentiation, and a preneoplastic phenotype. TET2 loss was linked to focal loss of enhancer hydroxymethylation and transcriptional repression of genes that mediate GC exit, such as PRDM1. Notably, these enhancers and genes are also repressed in CREBBP-mutant DLBCLs. Accordingly, TET2 mutation in patients yields a CREBBP-mutant gene-expression signature, CREBBP and TET2 mutations are generally mutually exclusive, and hydroxymethylation loss caused by TET2 deficiency impairs enhancer H3K27 acetylation. Hence, TET2 plays a critical role in the GC reaction, and its loss of function results in lymphomagenesis through failure to activate genes linked to GC exit signals. Significance: We show that TET2 is required for exit of the GC, B-cell differentiation, and is a tumor suppressor for mature B cells. Loss of TET2 phenocopies CREBBP somatic mutation. These results advocate for sequencing TET2 in patients with lymphoma and for the testing of epigenetic therapies to treat these tumors. See related commentary by Shingleton and Dave, p. 1515. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

Summary Mutations in epigenetic modifiers and signaling factors often co-occur in myeloid malignancies, including TET2 and NRAS mutations. Concurrent Tet2 loss and Nras G12D expression in hematopoietic cells induced myeloid transformation, with a fully penetrant, lethal chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), which was serially transplantable. Tet2 loss and Nras mutation cooperatively led to decrease in negative regulators of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, including Spry2, thereby causing synergistic activation of MAPK signaling by epigenetic silencing. Tet2/Nras double-mutant leukemia showed preferential sensitivity to MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibition in both mouse model and patient samples. These data provide insights into how epigenetic and signaling mutations cooperate in myeloid transformation and provide a rationale for mechanism-based therapy in CMML patients with these high-risk genetic lesions.

SummaryAlthough clinically tested JAK inhibitors reduce splenomegaly and systemic symptoms, molecular responses are not observed in most myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients. We previously demonstrated that MPN cells become persistent to type I JAK inhibitors that bind the active conformation of JAK2. We investigated whether CHZ868, a type II JAK inhibitor, would demonstrate activity in JAK inhibitor persistent cells, murine MPN models, and MPN patient samples. JAK2 and MPL mutant cell lines were sensitive to CHZ868, including type I JAK inhibitor persistent cells. CHZ868 showed significant activity in murine MPN models and induced reductions in mutant allele burden not observed with type I JAK inhibitors. These data demonstrate that type II JAK inhibition is a viable therapeutic approach for MPN patients.

Specific combinations of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) disease alleles, including FLT3 and TET2 mutations, confer distinct biologic features and adverse outcome. We generated mice with mutations in Tet2 and Flt3, which resulted in fully penetrant, lethal AML. Multipotent Tet2(-/-);Flt3(ITD) progenitors (LSK CD48(+)CD150(-)) propagate disease in secondary recipients and were refractory to standard AML chemotherapy and FLT3-targeted therapy. Flt3(ITD) mutations and Tet2 loss cooperatively remodeled DNA methylation and gene expression to an extent not seen with either mutant allele alone, including at the Gata2 locus. Re-expression of Gata2 induced differentiation in AML stem cells and attenuated leukemogenesis. TET2 and FLT3 mutations cooperatively induce AML, with a defined leukemia stem cell population characterized by site-specific changes in DNA methylation and gene expression.

Recent studies have reported that activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and ten-eleven-translocation (TET) family members regulate active DNA demethylation. Genetic alterations of TET2 occur in myeloid malignancies, and hematopoietic-specific loss of Tet2 induces aberrant hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal/differentiation, implicating TET2 as a master regulator of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Despite the functional link between AID and TET in epigenetic gene regulation, the role of AID loss in hematopoiesis and myeloid transformation remains to be investigated. Here, we show that Aid loss in mice leads to expansion of myeloid cells and reduced erythroid progenitors resulting in anemia, with dysregulated expression of Cebpa and Gata1, myeloid/erythroid lineage-specific transcription factors. Consistent with data in the murine context, silencing of AID in human bone marrow cells skews differentiation toward myelomonocytic lineage. However, in contrast to Tet2 loss, Aid loss does not contribute to enhanced HSC self-renewal or cooperate with Flt3-ITD to induce myeloid transformation. Genome-wide transcription and differential methylation analysis uncover the critical role of Aid as a key epigenetic regulator. These results indicate that AID and TET2 share common effects on myeloid and erythroid lineage differentiation, however, their role is nonredundant in regulating HSC self-renewal and in myeloid transformation.

Loss of Asxl1 results in myelodysplastic syndrome, whereas concomitant deletion of Tet2 restores HSC self-renewal and triggers a more severe disease phenotype distinct from that seen in single-gene knockout mice., Somatic Addition of Sex Combs Like 1 (ASXL1) mutations occur in 10–30% of patients with myeloid malignancies, most commonly in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), and are associated with adverse outcome. Germline ASXL1 mutations occur in patients with Bohring-Opitz syndrome. Here, we show that constitutive loss of Asxl1 results in developmental abnormalities, including anophthalmia, microcephaly, cleft palates, and mandibular malformations. In contrast, hematopoietic-specific deletion of Asxl1 results in progressive, multilineage cytopenias and dysplasia in the context of increased numbers of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, characteristic features of human MDS. Serial transplantation of Asxl1-null hematopoietic cells results in a lethal myeloid disorder at a shorter latency than primary Asxl1 knockout (KO) mice. Asxl1 deletion reduces hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, which is restored by concomitant deletion of Tet2, a gene commonly co-mutated with ASXL1 in MDS patients. Moreover, compound Asxl1/Tet2 deletion results in an MDS phenotype with hastened death compared with single-gene KO mice. Asxl1 loss results in a global reduction of H3K27 trimethylation and dysregulated expression of known regulators of hematopoiesis. RNA-Seq/ChIP-Seq analyses of Asxl1 in hematopoietic cells identify a subset of differentially expressed genes as direct targets of Asxl1. These findings underscore the importance of Asxl1 in Polycomb group function, development, and hematopoiesis.

We present a highly sensitive and selective chemical labeling and capture approach for genome-wide profiling of 5-hydroxylmethylcytosine (5hmC) using DNA isolated from ~1,000 cells (nano-hmC-Seal). Using this technology, we assessed 5hmC occupancy and dynamics across different stages of hematopoietic differentiation. Nano-hmC-Seal profiling of purified Tet2-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) murine stem cells allowed us to identify leukemia-specific, differentially hydroxymethylated regions that harbor known and novel candidate disease-specific target genes with differential 5hmC peaks compared to normal stem cells. The change of 5hmC patterns in AML strongly correlates with differential gene expression, demonstrating the importance of dynamic alterations of 5hmC in regulating transcription in AML. Together, covalent 5hmC labeling offers an effective approach to study and detect DNA methylation dynamics in in vivo disease models and in limited clinical samples.

Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 gene (IDH1) are common drivers of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but their mechanism is not fully understood. It is thought that IDH1 mutants act by inhibiting TET2 to alter DNA methylation, but there are significant unexplained clinical differences between IDH1- and TET2-mutant diseases. We have discovered that mice expressing endogenous mutant IDH1 have reduced numbers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), in contrast to Tet2 knockout (TET2-KO) mice. Mutant IDH1 downregulates the DNA damage (DD) sensor ATM by altering histone methylation, leading to impaired DNA repair, increased sensitivity to DD, and reduced HSC self-renewal, independent of TET2. ATM expression is also decreased in human IDH1-mutated AML. These findings may have implications for treatment of IDH-mutant leukemia.

Background Mutations in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) occur in many cancers including Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). In preclinical models mutant IDH2 (mIDH2) causes partial hemopoietic differentiation block1. Recently, we showed that single agent enasidenib, a first-in-class, selective mIDH2 inhibitor, produces a 40% response in relapsed/refractory AML patients by promoting differentiation2. Here, we studied response and acquired resistance to enasidenib, in sequential samples treated in the Phase 1 study of Enasidenib in relapsed/ refractory AML patients. Results We studied a cytogenetically and genetically representative subset of 25 patients enriched for enasidenib responders, genotyped by whole exome sequencing (WES) or cancer gene panel targeted re-sequencing. Pre-enasidenib, differentiation arrest in these AML patients resulted in abnormally expanded leukaemic progenitors or precursors and diminished mature haematopoietic populations. Complete remission (CR) post-enasidenib was associated with in increased mature populations, near-normalisation of haematopoietic progenitor profiles, and restoration of in vitro progenitor function. In most patients, mature blood cells (of erythroid and granulocyte-monocyte lineages) post-enasidenib are IDH2 mutant, consistent with enasidenib inducing differentiation of IDH2 mutant leukaemic progenitors/ precursors. Each mIDH2 patient studied had on average 13 somatic, non-synonymous exonic or splice site mutations in addition to IDH2 . We used single cell genotyping (SCG) to reveal linear or branching clonal structures in mIDH2 AML. We combined clonal structure data and immunophenotyping of haematopoietic progenitor, precursor and mature populations to track functional behaviour of mIDH2 clones before, and during enasidenib treatment. We demonstrate, for the first time, that mIDH2 subclones within the same patient are functionally heterogeneous: both in their ability to differentiate pre-enasidenib, and in their sensitivity to Enasidenib-induced differentiation. This suggests that different combinations of co-operating mutations result in functional heterogeneity of mIDH2 clones. When we studied the contribution of mIDH2 clones to functional haematopoiesis at CR, we found that this was supported by either ancestral or leukaemic terminal mIDH2 clones. Despite a median survival of 18-21 months in patients who respond to enasidenib, most patients eventually relapse3. In contrast to targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in all 12 relapse samples studied, none had second site mutations in IDH2 . Furthermore, 2-hydroxyglurate (2HG) levels remain suppressed in most patients suggesting enasidenib remains effective in inhibiting mIDH2 enzyme. Instead, mIDH2 clones, which had persisted at CR or partial remission (PR) acquired additional mutations or aneuploidy, highlighting bypass pathways which re-impose differentiation arrest. We found 4 patterns: i) acquisition of IDH1 codon R132 mutations which resulted in a rise in 2HG (n=2), ii) deletion of chromosome 7q (n=4), iii) gain of function mutations in genes implicated in cell proliferation (FLT3, CSF3R) (n=3) and iv) mutation in hematopoietic transcription factors (GATA2, RUNX1) (n=2). We also found mutations in 4 genes (DHX15 and DEAF1 (n=1) ; NFKB1 (n=1) and MTUS1 (n=1)) not previously implicated in haematopoietic differentiation arrest which were selected for, or evolved in mIDH2 subclones at relapse. Conclusion This study provides a paradigm of how deep clonal single cell analysis in purified hemopoietic compartments in sequential samples through therapy reveals clonal complexity and the impact of the selective pressure of therapy on clonal architecture. Furthermore, we gain insights into the functional heterogeneity of mIDH2 subclones in their ability to differentiate pre-and post-Enasidenib. Further analysis of this kind in a larger cohort of IDH2 -inhibitor-treated patients would also provide insight to improve efficacy of this novel class of therapeutics, and design of combination therapies in AML and other cancers. Finally, this provides a platform for further study of the pathways mediating enasidenib resistance. References 1. Kats, L.M. , et al. Cell Stem Cell14, 329-341 (2014). 2. Amatangelo, M.D. , et al. Blood (2017). 3. Stein, E.M. , et al. Blood (2017). Disclosures Quek: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Amatangelo: Celgene Corporation: Employment. Agresta: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stein: Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. De Botton: Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Thakurta: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Levine: Qiagen: Equity Ownership; Qiagen: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Vyas: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau.

Hatlen et al. provide an integrative analysis of the mutational landscape of mouse and human AML and identify functionally relevant cooperation between AML1-ETO and PTPN11 D61Y. Based on these findings, they generate a novel mouse model of t(8;21)+ AML., t(8;21) is one of the most frequent chromosomal abnormalities observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, expression of AML1-ETO is not sufficient to induce transformation in vivo. Consistent with this observation, patients with this translocation harbor additional genetic abnormalities, suggesting a requirement for cooperating mutations. To better define the genetic landscape in AML and distinguish driver from passenger mutations, we compared the mutational profiles of AML1-ETO–driven mouse models of leukemia with the mutational profiles of human AML patients. We identified TET2 and PTPN11 mutations in both mouse and human AML and then demonstrated the ability of Tet2 loss and PTPN11 D61Y to initiate leukemogenesis in concert with expression of AML1-ETO in vivo. This integrative genetic profiling approach allowed us to accurately predict cooperating events in t(8;21)+ AML in a robust and unbiased manner, while also revealing functional convergence in mouse and human AML.

Purpose: We investigated the molecular effect of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in vivo on all available tumors from patients treated on North American Brain Tumor Consortium trials 01-03 and 00-01 for recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. Experimental Design: EGFR expression and signaling during treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib were analyzed by Western blot and compared with pre–erlotinib/gefitinib–exposed tissue or unexposed controls. Tumors were also analyzed for EGFR mutations and for other genomic abnormalities by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clinical data were used to associate molecular features with tumor sensitivity to erlotinib or gefitinib. Results: Erlotinib and gefitinib did not markedly affect EGFR activity in vivo. No lung signature mutations of EGFR exons 18 to 21 were observed. There was no clear association between erlotinib/gefitinib sensitivity and deletion or amplification events on array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis, although novel genomic changes were identified. Conclusions: As erlotinib and gefitinib were generally ineffective at markedly inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation in these tumors, other assays may be needed to detect molecular effects. Additionally, the mechanism of erlotinib/gefitinib sensitivity likely differs between brain and lung tumors. Finally, novel genomic changes, including deletions of chromosomes 6, 21, and 22, represent new targets for further research.

Epigenetic modifiers and signaling factors are frequently mutated and often co-occur in various myeloid malignancies. However, precisely how these mutations cooperate to cause myeloid leukemia is not fully understood. Here, we show that cells with concurrent Ten-eleven-translocation 2 (Tet2) loss and Nras mutation can cause lethal chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) like disease in vivo and synergistically activate Ras signaling through epigenetic silencing of Sprouty2 (Spry2), thereby making cells with both disease alleles dependent on MAPK signaling and highly sensitive to MEK inhibition. To assess if Tet2 loss and Nras mutation cooperate in myeloid transformation, we crossed Tet2 conditional knockout mice (Mx1-Cre+Tet2f/f) and Nras mutant mice (Mx1-Cre+Nras+/G12D) to generate Mx1-Cre+Tet2f/fNras+/G12D mice (Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D). These mice, compared to single mutant mice with either allele alone, had more significant monocytosis, expansion of Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ (LSK) and myeloid progenitors in both bone marrow (BM) and spleen and development of lethal CMML-like disease (median survival 264 days). Moreover, serial transplantation of splenic cells derived from leukemic Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D mice caused similar CMML-like disease in recipients, which emanates from LSK-positive stem/progenitor cells as the disease propagating population. To delineate how Tet2 loss and Nras mutation synergize in leukemic transformation, we next performed western blot and phospho-flow analysis of MAPK and PI3K signaling in primary hematopoietic cells. Interestingly, pErk, pAkt and pS6 expression were significantly higher in Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D cells compared to WT or single mutant cells, indicating that Tet2 loss and Nras mutation cooperates to further activate Ras signaling (Figure 1). Consistent with our murine model, TET2 silencing in NRAS mutant human leukemia cells increased MAPK output, consistent with augmentation of signaling by concurrent TET2/NRAS alterations in human leukemia cells. To unravel the molecular mechanism of Ras signaling activation, we assessed mRNA / protein expression and performed bisulfite sequencing of known regulators of MAPK signaling, including Sprouty family members. We observed significant decrease of Spry2 expression, stepwise and specific hyper-methylation of CpG islands in the Spry2 promoter region in Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D cells compared to WT or single mutant cells, consistent with progressive epigenetic remodeling in these leukemia cells in vivo (Figure 2). Genome wide methylation profiling of WT, single mutant and Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D LSK cells using enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing demonstrated clear separation of leukemic Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D LSKs from WT or single mutant LSKs. Most importantly, restoration of Spry2 expression in Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D cells led to decrease in pErk / pAkt level and significantly reduced colony formation, which functionally validates Spry2 as a key epigenetic target in Tet2/Nras mutant leukemia cells. We next assessed whether the increased MAPK signaling seen in Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D cells leads to differential sensitivity to MEK inhibition by performing studies with the clinical MEK inhibitor binimetinib (ARRY162). Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D cells showed significantly higher sensitivity to binimetinib compared to Nras+/G12D cells in vitro (IC50, 6.948nM vs. 690.4nM). Moreover, in vivo treatment of Tet2Δ/ΔNras+/G12D leukemic recipients with binimetinib restored splenomegaly, significantly reduced disease burden in BM and spleen and improved overall survival compared to vehicle treatment (median survival 24.5 days vs. 44.5 days, p=0.0018, Figure 3). Of note, knockdown of human TET2 in NRAS mutant human leukemia cells sensitized to MEK inhibition in a similar manner demonstrating this approach may have value in leukemia patients with concurrent TET2 and NRAS mutations. These data clearly indicate that Tet2 loss and Nras mutation synergize in myeloid transformation and cooperatively remodel DNA methylation, which leads to epigenetic silencing of Spry2 and synergistic activation of MAPK signaling, which can be leveraged through therapeutic MEK inhibition. Our studies provide novel insights into how signaling and epigenetic mutations cooperate in leukemic transformation and provide a rationale for mechanism based therapy in CMML patients with these high risk genetic lesions. Disclosures Melnick: Janssen: Research Funding. Levine:Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy.

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, mediated by aberrant DNA hypermethylation and repressive histone modifications, is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Novel epigenetic therapies are emerging, but single-agent approaches targeting only one category of epigenetic marks have limited therapeutic activity. We show that combinatorial treatment strategy targeting epigenetic modifications of both promoter and enhancer elements can improve therapeutic intervention. As current cell lines do not accurately represent the heterogeneous nature of AML, we established an ex vivo culturing system enabling us to propagate primary AML specimens long enough to test epigenetic therapeutics (48 specimens expanded 4-6 weeks; 6 specimens expanded >12 months; 39 specimen fail to expand). We tested 52 expandable primary AMLs with a combination therapy utilizing the DNA demethylating agent 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza) and a novel small molecule inhibitor against LSD1, a histone demethylase that removes enhancer-associated marks (mono-/di-methylated histone H3 lysine 4; H3K4me1/2). In order to avoid DNA damage-induced cytotoxicity, we applied a non-DNA damaging dose of 5-Aza (≤ 200 nM). 5-Aza treatment had modest inhibition of cell growth for the majority of cases, but did not appreciably alter cell viability. Treatment with the LSD1 inhibitor (LSD1i) substantially impaired cell growth and survival of ~80% (p To gain insight into mechanism, we performed a genome-wide integrative analysis of the DNA methylome (Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing), LSD1 occupancy sites (ChIP-sequencing) and gene expression profiling (RNA-sequencing) in a TET2mut patient-derived AML sample. Single-agent LSD1i treatment led to induction of genes associated with myeloid differentiation. Even though 5-Aza induced substantial hypomethylation, there was only a minor effect on gene expression. However, combination therapy did induce greater de-repression of genes, in particular those where 5-Aza induced hypomethylation at promoters and at LSD1-occupied enhancers. Combination treatment especially potentiated induction of differentiation genes, suggesting potential anti-leukemia stem cell effects. Accordingly, combination therapy resulted in impaired colony formation potential (p=0.007). Moreover, limiting dilution analysis in NSG mice demonstrated significant impairment of leukemia-initiating cells (p=0.0025) after 5-Aza+LSD1i combination therapy when compared to either drug alone. To determine what genes mediate the effect of combination therapy, we studied genes preferentially induced by 5-Aza+LSD1i. GATA2, a transcription factor involved in hematopoietic differentiation, was more potently induced by combination therapy in primary AML samples vs. either drug alone. We found LSD1 occupied at the GATA2 distal hematopoietic enhancer and verified by using quantitative ChIP analysis that inhibition of LSD1 induced an increase of H3K4me2 and H3K27ac, a mark that reflects enhancer activation. Overexpression of GATA2 using viral transduction in two patient-derived AML cases caused partial differentiation and attenuated leukemia growth. These results indicated that cellular responses to combination therapy are in part mediated by induction of GATA2. In summary, our results provide a novel link for therapeutic approaches targeting redundant epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressors via cooperative enhancer and enhancer-promoter activation. Disclosures Duy: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mohammad:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Smitheman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Guzman:Cellectis: Research Funding. Kruger:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Creasy:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melnick:Janssen: Research Funding.

Although there is a binding site on the proteasome for the polyubiquitin chains attached to degradation substrates by the ubiquitination machinery, it is currently unclear whether in vivo the activities of the ubiquitination machinery and the proteasome are coupled. Here we show that two human homologs of the yeast ubiquitin-like Dsk2 protein, hPLIC-1 and hPLIC-2, physically associate with both proteasomes and ubiquitin ligases in large complexes. Overexpression of hPLIC proteins interferes with the in vivo degradation of two unrelated ubiquitin-dependent proteasome substrates, p53 and IκBα, but not a ubiquitin-independent substrate. Our findings raise the possibility that the hPLIC proteins, and possibly related ubiquitin-like family members, may functionally link the ubiquitination machinery to the proteasome to affect in vivo protein degradation.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myelogenous leukemia comprise a poor-risk subset of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myelogenous leukemia. Large-scale mutation profiling efforts in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes have identified mutations that correlate with clinical features, but such mutations have not been investigated in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myelogenous leukemia. Genomic DNA from 38 patient samples were subjected to high throughput polymerase chain reaction and sequenced for TP53, TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, IDH1, IDH2, EZH2, EED, SUZ12, RBBP4, SRSF2, U2AF35, and SF3B1. We identified somatic mutations in 16 of 38 (42%) patients. TP53 mutations were the most common lesion, detected in 8 of 38 (21%) patients, followed by TET2 in 4 of 38 (10.5%). Cases with a TP53 mutation or loss of the TP53 locus had a worse overall survival compared to those with wild-type TP53 (8.8 vs. 37.4 months; P=0.0035).