Search

Gully erosion is a serious environmental threat, compromising soil health, damaging agricultural lands, and destroying vital infrastructure. Pinpointing regions prone to gully erosion demands careful selection of an appropriate machine learning algorithm. This choice is crucial, as the complex interplay of various environmental factors contributing to gully formation requires a nuanced analytical approach. To develop the most accurate Gully Erosion Susceptibility Map (GESM) for India's Raiboni River basin, researchers harnessed the power of two cutting-edge machine learning algorithm: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forest (RF). For a comprehensive analysis, this study integrated 24 potential control factors. We meticulously investigated a dataset of 200 samples, ensuring an even balance between non-gullied and gullied locations. To assess multicollinearity among the 24 variables, we employed two techniques: the Information Gain Ratio (IGR) test and Variance Inflation Factors (VIF). Elevation, land use, river proximity, and rainfall most influenced the basin's GESM. Rigorous tests validated XGBoost and RF model performance. XGBoost surpassed RF (ROC 86% vs. 83.1%). Quantile classification yielded a GESM with five levels: very high to very low. Our findings reveal that roughly 12% of the basin area is severely affected by gully erosion. These findings underscore the critical need for targeted interventions in these highly susceptible areas. Furthermore, our analysis of gully characteristics unveiled a predominance of V-shaped gullies, likely in an active developmental stage, supported by an average Shape Index (SI) value of 0.26 and a mean Erosivness Index (EI) of 0.33. This research demonstrates the potential of machine learning to pinpoint areas susceptible to gully erosion. By providing these valuable insights, policymakers can make informed decisions regarding sustainable land management practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil erosion poses a significant threat to sustainable land management and agricultural productivity. Addressing this issue requires advanced predictive models that can accurately identify areas at risk and inform soil conservation strategies. This study focuses on the development and interpretation of well-optimized deep learning (DL) models to predict soil erosion probability, aiming to enhance decision-making in land management. Utilizing the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in conjunction with ground-truthing, we identified critical erosion-prone areas. To predict soil erosion probability, we employed Bayesian optimization to fine-tune Deep Neural Network (DNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN), and DNN-CNN hybrid models. These DL models were verified using a set of metrics. SHAP value analysis as a means of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) was used to interpret these DL models for better decision-making. RUSLE estimations and ground truthing highlight that Soil erosion rates in the northeastern and northwestern regions are nearing the highest observed at 25 tonnes per hectare annually, largely due to steep slopes and limited vegetation. In contrast, the southern and southeastern areas have lower erosion rates, due to denser vegetation and gentler slopes. Deep learning models, optimized using Bayesian methods, demonstrate high performance in spatially modeling soil erosion probability. The DNN model achieved an accuracy of 0.93, a precision of 0.92, and an F1-score of 0.94, identifying 222.73 sq. km as highly susceptible to erosion, which indicates its strong ability to detect true erosion events. The CNN model identified 49.68% of the study area (503.30 sq. km) as high-risk, with an accuracy of 0.90 and a precision of 0.91. The FCNN model showed a balanced risk distribution, indicating 37.04% of the land (375.25 sq. km) as very low risk and 36.43% (369.11 sq. km) as very high risk, with an accuracy of 0.91. The DNN-CNN hybrid model highlighted 41.58% of the area (421.20 sq. km) as high risk, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing spatial patterns of erosion susceptibility. SHAP value analysis indicates that land use and soil type (LULC and K-factor) are crucial in erosion predictions, with LULC having a significant predictive influence in the DNN model. These insights facilitate the prioritization of soil conservation measures, enabling decision-makers to focus on the most impactful factors for mitigating soil erosion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]