Search

ObjectiveTo characterize the association between payments made by vascular device companies to clinicians, and the conflict of interest (COI) declarations on relevant publications.Summary background dataClose association between medical device companies and clinicians is essential in the advancement of surgical technology. When evaluating the efficacy of novel equipment, identification of these relationships can minimize the risk of bias in relevant studies.MethodsUsing the Open Payments Database (OPD), the 10 highest compensated clinicians from 10 vascular device companies were identified. In the population based bibliometric analysis, general payments, number of payments, h-index, and academic rank were identified. PubMed and Scopus were queried to identify author publications. Relevance to payment received and COI disclosures were identified for each article.ResultsThe physicians identified earned $33,442,266.74 with a median of $92,500 in 2017. The authors published an average of 6.46+/-9.08 articles in 2018. Relevant COI was identified in 74%. In 50.5% of the relevant publications was a COI declared. The median h index of authors was 18+/-23. Community based physicians had a higher rate of COI disclosure (65.6%) compared to academic physicians (47.6%) (P = .008). Low h-index authors had a higher rate of COI declaration (71.4%) compared to high h-index (43.6%) (P = .001).ConclusionA high degree of inconsistency was found between self-declared COI and relevant articles published by the highest compensated physicians. We propose a policy of full disclosure and the addition of a link to each author's OPD page on all publications to increase access to potential COI.

Interventional oncology is a rapidly emerging field in the treatment of cancer. Minimally invasive techniques such as transarterial embolization with chemotherapeutic and radioactive agents are established therapies and are found in multiple guidelines for the management of primary and metastatic liver lesions. Percutaneous ablation is also an alternative to surgery for small liver, renal, and pancreatic tumors. Recent research in the niche of interventional oncology has focused on improving outcomes of established techniques in addition to the development of novel therapies. In this review, we address the recent and current advancements in devices, technologies, and techniques of chemoembolization and ablation: thermal ablation, histotripsy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, embolization strategies, liquid embolic agents, and local immunotherapy/antiviral therapies.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED) is being performed with increasing frequency. The objective of this study was to demonstrate how utilization of POCUS can help the emergency physician recognize emphysematous pyelitis (EP) and emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN). Case Report: A 60-year-old female presented to the ED with normal vital signs and intermittent left-sided flank pain that radiated to her groin. She also had a history of obstructive nephrolithiasis. Within 20 minutes of arrival she became febrile (101.2°Fahrenheit), tachycardic (114 beats per minute), tachypneic (21 breaths per minute), and had a blood pressure of 114/82 millimeters mercury. POCUS was conducted revealing heterogeneous artifact with “dirty shadowing” within the renal pelvis, which was strongly suggestive of air. The emergency physician ordered a computed tomography (CT) to confirm the suspicion for EP and started the patient on broad-spectrum antibiotics. The CT showed a 1.3-centimeter calculus and hydronephrosis with foci of air. The patient received intravenous antibiotics and had an emergent nephrostomy tube placed. Urine cultures tested positive for pan-sensitive Escherichia Coli. Urology was consulted and a repeat CT was obtained to show correct drainage and decreased renal pelvis dilation.Conclusion: Distinctly different forms of treatment are used for EP and EPN, despite both having similar pathophysiology. In EP, air can be seen in the renal pelvis on POCUS, as in this case study, which distinguishes it from EPN. In the case of our patient, the use of POCUS was useful to aid in rapid differentiation between EP and EPN.

Background: Current guidelines recommend 24-hour telemetry monitoring for isolated sternal fractures (ISFs) with electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities or troponin elevation. However, a single-center study suggested ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities (sinus tachycardia/bradycardia, nonspecific arrhythmia/ST-changes, and bundle branch block) may not require 24-hour telemetry monitoring. This study sought to corroborate this, hypothesizing ISF patients would not develop blunt cardiac injury (BCI). Materials & Methods: A retrospective study was performed at 8 trauma centers (1/2018-8/2020). Patients with ISF (abbreviated injury scale <2 for the head/neck/face/abdomen/extremities) and minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevations were included. Patients with multiple rib fractures or hemothorax/pneumothorax were excluded. The primary outcome was an echocardiogram confirmed BCI. The secondary outcome was significant BCI defined as cardiogenic shock, dysrhythmia requiring treatment, post-traumatic cardiac structural defects, unexplained hypotension, or cardiac-related procedures. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Of 124 ISF patients with minor ECG abnormalities or troponin elevation, 90% were admitted with a mean stay of 35 hours. Echocardiogram was performed for 31.5% of patients, 10 (25.6%) of which had abnormalities. However, no patient had BCI diagnosed on echocardiography. In total, 2 patients (1.6%) had a significant BCI (atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia at 10 and 82 hours after injury). No patient died. Conclusions: Following ISF with minor ECG changes or troponin elevation, <2% suffered significant BCI, and none had an echocardiogram diagnosed BCI, despite >30% receiving echocardiogram. These findings challenge the dogma of mandatory observation periods following ISF with associated ECG abnormalities and support the lack of utility for routine echocardiography in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]