Search

Simple Summary: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) frequently results in increased pain and distress for women affected by the disease. Management of these symptoms can be complicated and expensive, leading to undue stress for these patients and their families. Palliative care has demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating symptomology due to disease and improving quality of life for patients with MBC, yet utilization of palliative care remains low. The purpose of this study is to document the prevalence of palliative care consultations among inpatients with metastatic breast cancer and to examine the impact of palliative care on the length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. The results of this study demonstrate that only 5.7% of patients with metastatic breast cancer received a palliative care consultation during their inpatient stay. Palliative care consultation was associated with a longer length of stay but lower hospital charges. Introduction: Women with late-stage metastatic breast cancer are at an increased risk of pain and distress from symptoms and often struggle with associated emotional and financial burden of their disease. Palliative care is known to alleviate symptom burden in patients with end-stage, terminal diseases but is often underutilized in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The current study aims to investigate the prevalence of palliative care consultation on inpatients with metastatic breast cancer and examine the association between palliative care consultation and length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 1998–2017 were abstracted from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Database (NIS). The primary outcome was the presence of a palliative care consultation (PCC) during the inpatient stay. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay and total hospital charges. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the presence of a PCC. The relationship between PCC and hospital length of stay and total hospital charges were investigated using linear regression. Results: 513,509 cases of metastatic breast cancer were identified, 5.7% had a documented in-hospital palliative care encounter. Of those who received PCC, total hospital charges were about USD 5452 less than those who did not receive consultation. Women who received PCC had higher odds of a longer hospital stay. Predictors of PCC were older age, non-White race, and residing in a lower-income ZIP code. Conclusions: Palliative care remains to be an underutilized resource among patients with end-stage metastatic breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) among pregnant patients with substance use disorder (SUD) compared to individuals without SUD. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of inpatient hospitalizations of pregnant people from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2019. ICD-10 codes were used to identify the frequency of SMM and/or APO between those with and without SUD by race/ethnicity. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the effect of race/ethnicity as an independent predictor and as an effect modifier of SMM and APO in patients with SUD. Results: From 2,508,259 hospitalizations, SUD was identified in 6.7% admissions with the highest rate in White patients (8.2%) followed by Black (7.7%) and Hispanic (2.2%) patients. Rate of SMM and APO were increased in patients with SUD in all racial/ethnic groups compared to those without SUD, increasing by 1% and 10%, respectively. Among all patients, Black race was an independent predictor of SMM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05–2.13) and APO (aOR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.56–1.59). Hispanic ethnicity was also an independent risk factor for predicting SMM (aOR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.37–1.43). Among Hispanic patients, SUD was associated with an ∼90% increased likelihood of SMM and APO. Conclusion: Although higher rates of SMM and APO are seen among hospitalizations of pregnant people with SUD, racial/ethnic disparities also exist among this population. This warrants further attention and presents an opportunity for intervention and for addressing the root causes of racial and ethnic disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundOvarian cancer (OC) requires complex multidisciplinary care with wide variations in outcome. We sought to determine the impact of institutional and process of care factors on overall survival (OS) and delivery of guideline care nationally.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of primary OC diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) capturing 80% of all U.S. cases. Patient- (demographics, comorbidities, stage/grade), process of care (adherence to guidelines) and institutional- (facility type, case volume) factors were evaluated. Primary outcomes were OS and delivery of guideline therapy. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis.ResultsWe analyzed 96,802 consecutive cases. Five-year OS was 84%, 66.3%, 32% and 15.7% for stages I, II, III and IV, respectively. The annual mean facility case volumes varied by cancer center type (range: 5.7 to 26.7), with 25% of cases spread over 65% of centers--all treating fewer than 8 cases. Overall, 56% of cases received non-guideline care. Low facility case volume and higher comorbidity index independently predicted non-guideline care; high volume centers were less likely to deliver non-guideline care (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.41-0.47). Delivery of non-guideline care (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.36-1.44), and higher facility case volume (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) were both independent predictors of OS.ConclusionsDelivery of guideline care and facility case volume are important drivers of overall survival. Most cancer centers treat very few women with OC. National efforts should focus on improved access to centers with expertise in OC and ensuring delivery of guideline care.