Search

Immunomodulatory agents with the potential to reverse critical COVID-19, targeting host-virus immune response are needed. In this exploratory sub study of a randomised controlled clinical trial, critical COVID-19 patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome at one Swedish university hospital were randomly assigned (1:1) to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) group plus best practice, or best practice (Control). Follow-up was 30 days. HBOT was administered with five treatments at 2.4 atm absolute (ATA), lasting 80 min, within the first seven days. Clinical outcome, inflammatory markers, and bulk RNA sequencing (RNAseq) on peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analysed. Between December 3rd, 2020, and May 17th, 2021, 23 patients were randomised, and 17 were analysed. RNA-sequencing revealed 791 differentially expressed genes in the HBOT group compared to 46 in the control group at Day 7 vs. baseline. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed a unique transcriptomic signature associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) in the HBOT group. Patients in the HBOT group recovered faster and had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (HLoS), 16 vs. 26 days (95.99 % CI -16-0), p = 0.045. National early warning score (NEWS) was lower in the HBOT group (ANOVA, F [8, 120] = 3.817, p < 0.001) and PaO 2 /FiO 2 was higher in the HBOT group (Mixed effects model, F [8, 94] = 2.900, p < 0.01). We showed a unique transcriptomic signature related to viral-induced ERS in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with HBOT. The finding was associated with a positive clinical outcome; the HBOT patients recovered faster and had a reduced HLoS compared with controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04327505 (March 31, 2020) and EudraCT 2020-001349-37 (April 24, 2020)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The trial was funded by The Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) grant (KBF 2019–00446) made available by redirecting funds to COVID-19 research originally awarded to Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg. Internal funding from Peter Lindholm, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, KI. PL is also supported by the Ted and Michelle Gurnee Endowed Chair for Hyperbaric medicine research at University of California San Diego. Grants from Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias frimurarestiftelse and Berth von Kantzow stiftelse was made available by Sergiu-Bogdan Catrina. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few treatment options exist for patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data on the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for this condition is limited., Objective: To evaluate benefits and harms of HBOT in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS., Methods: In this open-label trial conducted at three hospitals in Sweden and Germany, patients with moderate to severe ARDS and at least two risk factors for unfavourable outcome, were randomly assigned (1:1) to medical oxygen 100 %, 2·4 Atmospheres absolute (ATA), 80 min (HBOT) adjuvant to best practice or to best practice alone (Control). Randomisation was stratified by sex and site. The primary endpoint was ICU admission by Day 30., Results: Between June 4, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021, 34 subjects were randomised to HBOT (N = 18) or Control (N = 16). The trial was prematurely terminated for futility. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU admission, 5 (50 %) in Control vs 13 (72 %) in HBOT. OR 2·54 [95 % CI 0·62-10·39], p = 0·19., Harms: 102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded. 16 (94 %) subjects in the HBOT group and 14 (93 %) in the control group had at least one AE. Three serious adverse events (SAEs), were at least, possibly related to HBOT. All deaths were unlikely related to HBOT., Conclusions: HBOT did not reduce ICU admission or mortality in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS. The trial cannot conclude definitive benefits or harms. Treating COVID-19-induced ARDS with HBOT is feasible with a favourable harms profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: KRW disclose funding from the Swedish Research Council, grant number KBF 2019–00446 for the current trial. JK disclose consulting fee for statistical work in this trial. For a full disclosure, please see Appendix A., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: A few prospective trials and case series have suggested that hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be efficacious for the treatment of severe COVID-19, but safety is a concern for critically ill patients. We present an interim analysis of the safety of HBOT via a randomized controlled trial (COVID-19-HBO)., Methods: A randomized controlled, open-label, clinical trial was conducted in compliance with good clinical practice to explore the safety and efficacy of HBOT for severe COVID-19 in critically ill patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Between 3 June 2020, and 17 May 2021, 31 patients with severe COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS, a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ) < 26.7 kPa (200 mmHg), and at least two defined risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or mortality were enrolled in the trial and randomized 1:1 to best practice, or HBOT in addition to best practice. The subjects allocated to HBOT received a maximum of five treatments at 2.4 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 80 min over seven days. The subjects were followed up for 30 days. The safety endpoints were analyzed., Results: Adverse events (AEs) were common. Hypoxia was the most common adverse event reported. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Numerically, serious adverse events (SAEs) and barotrauma were more frequent in the control group, and the differences between groups were in favor of the HBOT in PaO 2 /FiO 2 (PFI) and the national early warning score (NEWS); statistically, however, the differences were not significant at day 7, and no difference was observed for the total oxygen burden and cumulative pulmonary oxygen toxicity dose (CPTD)., Conclusion: HBOT appears to be safe as an intervention for critically ill patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS induced by COVID-19., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04327505 (31 March 2020) and EudraCT 2020-001349-37 (24 April 2020).

Background: With ~ 50 million individuals suffering from post-COVID condition (PCC), low health related quality of life (HRQoL) is a vast problem. Common symptoms of PCC, that persists 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 are fatigue, shortness of breath and cognitive dysfunction. No effective treatment options have been widely adopted in clinical practice. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO 2 ) is a candidate drug., Methods: The objective of this interim analysis is to describe our cohort and evaluate the safety of HBO 2 for post covid condition. In an ongoing randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind, clinical trial, 20 previously healthy subjects with PCC were assigned to HBO 2 or placebo. Primary endpoints are physical domains in RAND-36; Physical functioning (PF) and Role Physical (RP) at 13 weeks. Secondary endpoints include objective physical tests. Safety endpoints are occurrence, frequency, and seriousness of Adverse Events (AEs). An independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) reviewed unblinded data. The trial complies with Good Clinical Practice. Safety endpoints are evaluated descriptively. Comparisons against norm data was done using t-test., Results: Twenty subjects were randomised, they had very low HRQoL compared to norm data. Mean (SD) PF 31.75 (19.55) (95% Confidence interval; 22.60-40.90) vs 83.5 (23.9) p < 0.001 in Rand-36 PF and mean 0.00 (0.00) in RP. Very low physical performance compared to norm data. 6MWT 442 (180) (95% CI 358-525) vs 662 (18) meters p < 0.001. 31 AEs occurred in 60% of subjects. In 20 AEs, there were at least a possible relationship with the study drug, most commonly cough and chest pain/discomfort., Conclusions: An (unexpectedly) high frequency of AEs was observed but the DSMB assessed HBO 2 to have a favourable safety profile. Our data may help other researchers in designing trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04842448. Registered 13 April 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04842448 . EudraCT: 2021-000764-30. Registered 21 May 2021, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2021-000764-30/SE., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Long COVID-19, where symptoms persist 12 weeks after the initial SARS-CoV-2-infection, is a substantial problem for individuals and society in the surge of the pandemic. Common symptoms are fatigue, postexertional malaise and cognitive dysfunction. There is currently no effective treatment and the underlying mechanisms are unknown, although several hypotheses exist, with chronic inflammation as a common denominator. In prospective studies, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to be effective for the treatment of similar syndromes such as chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. A case series has suggested positive effects of HBOT in long COVID-19. This randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial will explore HBOT as a potential treatment for long COVID-19. The primary objective is to evaluate if HBOT improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with long COVID-19 compared with placebo/sham. The main secondary objective is to evaluate whether HBOT improves endothelial function, objective physical performance and short-term HRQoL., Methods and Analysis: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II clinical trial in 80 previously healthy subjects debilitated due to long COVID-19, with low HRQoL. Clinical data, HRQoL questionnaires, blood samples, objective tests and activity metre data will be collected at baseline. Subjects will be randomised to a maximum of 10 treatments with hyperbaric oxygen or sham treatment over 6 weeks. Assessments for safety and efficacy will be performed at 6, 13, 26 and 52 weeks, with the primary endpoint (physical domains in RAND 36-Item Health Survey) and main secondary endpoints defined at 13 weeks after baseline. Data will be reviewed by an independent data safety monitoring board., Ethics and Dissemination: The trial is approved by the Swedish National Institutional Review Board (2021-02634) and the Swedish Medical Products Agency (5.1-2020-36673). Positive, negative and inconclusive results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with open access., Trial Registration Number: NCT04842448., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AK and PL disclose funding from Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (HLF) and Stockholm Health Council for the present trial. AK disclose funding from Oura Health Oy with complimentary hardware and software for the Oura rings. MS discloses funding from Swedish Research Council and Dysautonomia International during the trial and previously from HLF. MS also disclose consulting fees from the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment of Social Services, speaker honoraria from Orion Pharma, Werfen, and has filed a patent for pharmacological treatment in post-COVID postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. JK declares consulting fee for statistical work in this trial. LA-H, AH, SEG, SA-E, EB, CJS, JP, KM, KRW, XZ, SBC, MR, JB and MN-B declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)