1. Multimodal Imaging of Reticular Pseudodrusen in Turkish Patients.
- Author
-
Çeper SB, Afrashi F, Değirmenci C, Menteş J, Nalçacı S, and Akkın C
- Subjects
- Humans, Ophthalmoscopy, Fluorescein Angiography methods, Multimodal Imaging, Retinal Drusen diagnosis, Retinal Drusen epidemiology, Macular Degeneration diagnosis
- Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the presence and prevalence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) in patients with age-related macular degeneration using multiple imaging modalities and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these modalities in the detection of RPD., Materials and Methods: Images from a total of 198 consecutive patients were analyzed prospectively. Color fundus photography, red-free imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), infrared and blue reflectance (BR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography were performed. RPD was diagnosed in the presence of relevant findings in at least two of the imaging methods used., Results: RPD were detected in 149 eyes (37.6%). In the detection of RPD, color fundus photography, red-free photography, SD-OCT, infrared, FAF, BR, and FFA imaging had sensitivity values of 50%, 57.7%, 91.6%, 95%, 74.6%, 65.7%, and 28.2% and specificity values of 99.6%, 100%, 98.4%, 94.6%, 100%, 99.6%, and 69.8%, respectively., Conclusion: Infrared imaging had the highest sensitivity. SD-OCT combined with infrared imaging was the most sensitive imaging technique for detecting RPD. The high specificity of FAF, red-free, and BR imaging may be useful to confirm a diagnosis of RPD., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors., (©Copyright 2023 by the Turkish Ophthalmological Association / Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology published by Galenos Publishing House.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF