Search

Studies on the outcomes of de novo three-vessel coronary artery disease (3VD) are limited. This study evaluated the outcomes after coronary revascularization in patients with 3VD treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (2ndDES) in comparison with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We analyzed 853 patients undergoing either PCI or CABG for 3VD between 2010 and 2014. Of them, this study included 298 undergoing PCI with 2ndDES alone (PCI group) and 171 undergoing CABG (CABG group). The primary outcome measure was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. The secondary outcome measures were cardiac death, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Propensity matching was used to adjust a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Between the PCI and CABG groups, no significant differences were found in the 3-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome measure (14.9% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.60). After propensity score matching, no significant differences were found in the incidences of primary outcome measure (13.0% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.95), cardiac death, MI, and stroke (3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.72; 1.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.31; and 4.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.35), whereas that of TVR was significantly higher in the PCI group (24.5 vs. 7.1%, p

BACKGROUND Little is known of the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings and recurrent restenosis after paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR). To identify the predictors of recurrent restenosis after PCB angioplasty, we investigated quantitative and qualitative OCT findings during PCB angioplasty for DES-ISR. Methods and Results: In all, 222 DES-ISR lesions treated by PCB angioplasty with OCT assessment and followed-up angiographically at 6 months were divided into restenotic and non-restenotic lesions on the basis of the presence or absence of restenosis at follow-up. There was a significantly higher proportion of the heterogeneous tissue pattern in restenotic than non-restenotic lesions (26.5% vs. 11.0%, respectively; P=0.02). The OCT-derived post-procedural minimal lumen and stent areas were significantly smaller in restenotic lesions, but the intima area was similar in both groups. Post-procedural stent underexpansion, defined as a stent diameter : size of the previous stent ratio

A relationship between serum polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and cardiovascular disease has been reported; however, the existence of a relationship between serum PUFAs and extent of vessel disease (VD) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear.Between July 2011 and June 2015, 866 consecutive STEMI patients underwent emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, 507 of whom were enrolled and classified into three groups according to the initial angiograms: 1VD, 294 patients; 2VD, 110 patients; and 3VD/left main trunk disease (LMTD), 103 patients. Serum levels of PUFAs, including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and arachidonic acid, and other laboratory data during hospitalization were evaluated.The serum EPA level in the 3VD/LMTD group was significantly lower than that in the 1VD group (55.5 ± 22.1 versus 66.2 ± 28.7, P = 0.002) and was slightly lower than that in the 2VD group (55.5 ± 22.1 versus 65.2 ± 28.9, P = 0.0167). Multivariate adjustment analysis revealed that age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.89; P = 0.038) and a low serum EPA level (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.023) were independent risk factors for 3VD/LMTD, while a low serum DHA level was not.A low serum EPA level may be more strongly related than a low serum DHA level to the extent of VD in STEMI patients. Age ≥ 70 years and a low serum EPA level may be independent risk factors for 3VD/LMTD.

Background Data are scarce on the role of aortic valve area (AVA) to identify those patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high risk of adverse events. We sought to explore the prognostic impact of AVA in asymptomatic patients with severe AS in a large observational database. Methods and Results Among 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, the present study included 1309 conservatively managed asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The study patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on AVA (group 1: AVA >0.80 cm2, N=645; group 2: 0.8 cm2 ≥AVA >0.6 cm2, N=465; and group 3: AVA ≤0.6 cm2, N=199). The prevalence of very severe AS patients (peak aortic jet velocity ≥5 m/s or mean aortic pressure gradient ≥60 mm Hg) was 2.0%, 5.8%, and 26.1% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The cumulative 5‐year incidence of AVR was not different across the 3 groups (39.7%, 43.7%, and 39.9%; P=0.43). The cumulative 5‐year incidence of the primary outcome measure (a composite of aortic valve–related death or heart failure hospitalization) was incrementally higher with decreasing AVA (24.1%, 29.1%, and 48.1%; P, See Editorial by Tribouilloy et al

Background Data on bleeding events in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are insufficient. In addition, the efficacy and safety of a maintenance dose of prasugrel 2.5 mg/day in high bleeding risk patients are unknown.Methods and Results:We prospectively enrolled 1,167 consecutive patients with suspected ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The maintenance dose of prasugrel 2.5 mg/day was prescribed for patients with a low body weight (≤50 kg), elderly (≥75 years), or renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2). In-hospital events were assessed in 992 ACS patients treated with drug-eluting stents. Excluding 29 in-hospital deaths, out-of-hospital events were assessed in 963 ACS patients. The primary safety outcome measure was major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 and 5). The incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was 3.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that being elderly, low body weight, renal insufficiency, stroke history, femoral approach, and mechanical support usage were independent predictors of in-hospital major bleeding. The cumulative 1-year incidence of out-of-hospital major bleeding was not significantly different between the prasugrel 2.5 mg/day (n=284) and 3.75 mg/day (n=487) groups (1.6% vs. 0.7%, log-rank P=0.24). That of out-of-hospital definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0% in both groups. Conclusions The maintenance dose of adjusted prasugrel 2.5 mg/day seems to be one option in ACS patients at high bleeding risk.

BACKGROUND Data on outcomes of non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the 2-stent strategy using 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are insufficient.Methods and Results:The 2-year outcomes and predictors of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 356 patients with 364 non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the 2-stent strategy using 2nd-generation DES were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome measure was defined as TLR. The median follow-up duration was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.7-4.9 years). A 2-year clinical follow-up was achieved in 99.2%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of TLR was 9.2%. Multiple stents implanted in either the main branch (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-6.62; P=0.006) or the side branch (adjusted OR 4.55; 95% CI: 1.99-10.4; P

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).The prognostic impact of LVEF in severe AS remains controversial.Among 3,815 consecutive patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, the present study population consisted of 3,794 patients after excluding 21 patients without LVEF data. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to LVEF at index echocardiography (50%, 50% to 59%, 60% to 69%, and ≥70%; conservative strategy: n = 388, n = 390, n = 1,025, and n = 800; initial aortic valve replacement strategy: n = 206, n = 170, n = 375, and n = 440). Echocardiographic data were site reported, and there was no echocardiography core laboratory.In the conservative group, the cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure (a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization) was significantly higher in patients with LVEFs 50% and 50% to 59% than in those with LVEFs 60% to 69% and ≥70% (72.3%, 58.4%, 38.7%, and 35.0%, respectively, p 0.001), whereas in the initial aortic valve replacement group, the negative effect of low LVEF was markedly attenuated (20.2%, 20.3%, 17.7%, and 12.4%, respectively, p = 0.03). After adjusting for confounders, LVEF 50% (hazard ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 2.28; p 0.001) and 50% to 59% (hazard ratio: 1.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.42 to 2.20; p 0.001) but not 60% to 69% (hazard ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.94 to 1.39; p = 0.17) were independently associated with poorer outcomes compared with LVEF ≥70% (reference) in the conservative group. In the initial aortic valve replacement group, the adjusted risk for the primary outcome measure was not significantly different across the 4 LVEF groups.This study demonstrates that survival in patients with severe AS is impaired when LVEF is 60%, and these findings have implications for decision making with regard to the timing of surgical intervention.

Background Characteristics and prognosis of hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis have not yet been well defined. Methods and Results The CURRENT AS (contemporary outcomes after surgery and medical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis) registry, a Japanese multicenter registry, enrolled 3815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis. There were 405 hemodialysis patients (initial aortic valve replacement [ AVR ] group: N=135 [33.3%], and conservative group: N=270) and 3410 nonhemodialysis patients (initial AVR group: N=1062 [31.1%], and conservative group: N=2348). The median follow‐up duration after the index echocardiography was 1361 days, with 90% follow‐up rate at 2 years. The cumulative 5‐year incidence of all‐cause death was significantly higher in hemodialysis patients than in nonhemodialysis patients in both the entire cohort (71% versus 40%, P AVR group (63.2% versus 17.9%, P AVR group as compared with the conservative group was associated with significantly lower cumulative 5‐year incidences of all‐cause death (60.6% versus 75.5%, P P AVR procedure, was markedly higher in the hemodialysis patients than in the nonhemodialysis patients (21.2% and 2.3%, P Conclusions Among hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis, the initial AVR strategy as compared with the conservative strategy was associated with significantly lower long‐term mortality risk, particularly the risk for sudden death, although the effect size for the survival benefit of the initial AVR strategy was smaller than that in the nonhemodialysis patients.

Background Little is known about the impact of stent type on the prognosis of vasospastic angina (VSA) in patients who undergo stent implantation.Methods and Results:We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography with positive (n=650; VSA) and negative (n=2,872; non-VSA) ergonovine testing. Among them, 304 patients undergoing stent implantation for organic stenosis were classified for comparison into 3 respective VSA and non-VSA groups based on stent type (68 and 78 with bare-metal stent [BMS]; 21 and 49 with sirolimus-eluting stent [SES]; 26 and 62 with newer generation drug-eluting stent [N-DES]). The primary outcome was defined as target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, emergency coronary angiography, and cardiac death. The 2-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the VSA group than non-VSA group after SES implantation (38.1% vs. 16.1%, P=0.03), whereas there were no differences between the 2 groups after both BMS implantation and N-DES implantation. The difference in the percent diameter stenosis from mid-term to late-term follow-up was significantly higher in the VSA group than non-VSA group (10.0% vs. 2.3%, P=0.045) after SES implantation, whereas there were no differences between the 2 groups after both BMS implantation and N-DES implantation. Conclusions The impact of VSA on clinical and angiographic outcomes was observed only in SES implantation, but not after N-DES or BMS implantation.

Background There are limited data regarding the risk stratification based on peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax) in patients with severe aortic stenosis ( AS ). Methods and Results Among 3815 consecutive patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, the study population consisted of 1075 conservatively managed patients with Vmax ≥4.0 m/s and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The study patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on Vmax (group 1, 4.0 ≤ Vmax AS ‐related events (aortic valve–related death or heart failure hospitalization) was incrementally higher with increasing Vmax (entire population; 38.0%, 49.4%, and 62.8%, P P =0.008; and asymptomatic patients; 29.4%, 38.9%, and 47.7%, P =0.005). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of group 2 and group 3 relative to group 1 for AS ‐related events remained significant (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI , 1.07–1.81; P =0.02, and hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI , 1.17–2.00; P =0.002, respectively). The effect size of group 3 relative to group 1 for AS ‐related events in asymptomatic patients (N=479) was similar to that in symptomatic patients (N=596; hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI , 1.01–2.52; P =0.047, and hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI , 1.16–2.40, P =0.008, respectively), and there was no significant overall interaction between the symptomatic status and the effect of the Vmax categories on AS ‐related events (interaction, P =0.88). Conclusions In conservatively managed severe AS patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, increasing Vmax was associated with incrementally higher risk for AS ‐related events. However, the cumulative 5‐year incidence of the AS ‐related events remained very high even in asymptomatic patients with less greater Vmax.

Very long-term angiographic results after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation have not been clarified. This study investigated serial angiographic results of early (1year), late (1-5years), and very late (5years) follow-up after SES implantation and the progression process to very late SES failure.We analyzed 631 lesions undergoing serial coronary angiography at early, late, and very late follow-up after SES implantation. The results of 205 lesions undergoing very late target lesion revascularization (VL-TLR; TLR beyond 5years) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 83) and non-ACS (122) were evaluated in comparison with 426 non-TLR lesions as a control group.Non-TLR lesions showed no attenuated decline of minimum lumen diameter from postprocedure (2.51±0.47mm), early (2.37±0.58mm), late (2.22±0.60mm), up to very late (2.01±0.63mm) follow-up. In VL-TLR lesions, compared to non-TLR lesions, late lumen loss (LLL) from postprocedure to early follow-up was similar, but delayed LLL from early to late follow-up was significantly larger (0.25±0.48mm vs. 0.15±0.46mm, p=0.01). Although the delayed LLL was significantly larger in non-ACS lesions (0.29±0.44mm) than in non-TLR lesions (p0.01), it was similar in ACS (0.19±0.52mm) and non-TLR lesions (p=0.54). Very delayed LLL from late to very late follow-up was 1.65±0.82mm in ACS lesions and 1.10±0.76mm in non-ACS lesions.Progression of in-stent luminal narrowing did not attenuate beyond 5years after SES implantation. In very late SES failure, stent-related ACS lesions showed gradual luminal narrowing and subsequent rapid progression beyond 5years, whereas non-ACS lesions had progressive luminal narrowing within 5years.

An 88-year-old woman underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a SAPIEN 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Pre-procedural examinations showed an aortic valve area of 0.39 cm2 and severe calcification of the leaflets. During pre

The difference in clinical presentations (acute coronary syndrome [ACS] and stable coronary artery disease [SCAD]) and related angiographic morphologies of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) failure requiring target lesion revascularization (TLR) during early-term (1year), late-term (1-5years), and very late-term periods (5years) remains unknown.Among 4484 lesions undergoing SES implantation, clinically-driven TLR was performed on 105 lesions during early-term, 169 lesions during late-term, and 147 lesions during very late-term period. Angiographic morphological patterns were divided into focal or non-focal patterns and stent-edge or stent-body patterns.The proportion of ACS substantially increased in very late TLR lesions (57.1%) from early (40.0%, p=0.01) and late TLR lesions (36.7%, p0.001). The proportions of both stent-edge and non-focal patterns were higher in very late TLR lesions than in early and late TLR lesions. Although the stent-edge pattern tended to be more prevalent in SCAD lesions than in ACS lesions during the early- and late-term periods, it was more frequently observed in ACS lesions than in SCAD lesions during the very late-term period (65.5% vs. 47.6%, p=0.04). The non-focal pattern was more frequent in ACS lesions than in SCAD lesions during all 3 periods. However, the proportion of the non-focal pattern in ACS lesions was extremely high during the very late-term (90.5%) compared with the early- (47.6%, p0.001) and late-term periods (48.4%, p0.001).Stent-related ACS became more common beyond 5years after SES implantation. Stent-edge and non-focal patterns were the main angiographic morphologies of very late SES failure, particularly causing ACS.

Background— There are currently inadequate data about whether late restenosis occurs after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with DES restenosis. Methods and Results— We collected data for 608 patients who received revascularization for DES restenosis between 2004 and 2012 and analyzed 688 lesions: 359 lesions treated with a first-generation DES (first DES) and 329 lesions treated with a second-generation DES (second DES). Two serial angiographic follow-ups were routinely planned for the patients (at 8 and 20 months after the procedure). Early follow-up angiography was performed for 620 lesions (90.1%), and recurrent restenosis occurred in 84 lesions (25.8%) in the first DES group and in 72 lesions (24.5%) in the second DES group ( P =0.78). Target lesion revascularization was performed for 69 lesions (21.2%) in the first DES group and for 48 lesions (16.3%) in the second DES group ( P =0.15). Late follow-up angiography was performed for 438 (87.1%) of the remaining 503 lesions (excluding target lesion revascularization lesions), and late restenosis was found in 35 lesions (15.8%) in the first DES group and in 28 lesions (14.7%) in the second DES group ( P =0.79). Nonfocal-type restenosis, percentage diameter stenosis after the procedure, previous stent size ≤2.5 mm, and right coronary artery ostial lesion were independent predictors of early restenosis. Nonfocal-type restenosis, percentage diameter stenosis at early follow-up, and stent fracture were independent predictors of late restenosis. Conclusions— Late restenosis occurs after both first DES implantation and second DES implantation for DES restenosis.

In-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation (DES-ISR) in the left main coronary artery remains challenging to manage. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for DES-ISR in the left main coronary artery. We identified 91 DES-ISR lesions in the

We sought to determine the predictors of recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) after paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for ISR in patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis. A total of 235 ISR lesions in patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis treated with PCB between

ObjectiveEfficacy and safety data on biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) are currently limited to 5 years. We evaluated longer term (8–10 years) clinical and angiographic outcomes after BP-BES implantation.MethodsBetween 2005 and 2008, 243 patients (301 lesions) underwent BP-BES implantation. The primary clinical outcome measure was defined as any target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Absolute serial angiographic studies without any concomitant TLR within 2 years after the procedure were performed in 55 patients (65 lesions) at postprocedure, mid-term (within 1 year), late term (between 1 and 2 years) and very late term (beyond 2 years).ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 9.4 years (IQR 8.2–10.2 years). The 8-year cumulative incidence of any TLR was 20.3%. The increase rate was approximately 7% per year in the first 2 years, but decelerated to approximately 1.2% per year beyond 2 years after the procedure. The minimal lumen diameter significantly decreased from postprocedure (2.63±0.44 mm) to mid-term (2.43±0.59 mm, p=0.002) and from late term (2.27±0.63 mm) to very late term (1.98±0.73 mm, p=0.002). The 8-year cumulative incidences of definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) ≥3) were 0.5% and 12.0%, respectively. Definite ST was none within 10 years in the entire cohort.ConclusionsThe long-term clinical outcomes after BP-BES implantation were favourable, although angiographic late progression of luminal narrowing did not reach a plateau. The incidence of ST remained notably low, whereas that of major bleeding gradually increased.

Stent fracture (SF) is related to restenosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. SF being a rare complication, the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for restenosis with SF after DES implantation has not been well studied. A total of 19578 lesions (11504 patients) were

Coronary obstruction (CO) after balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains difficult to predict. We aimed to assess the two new indexes that we had developed for predicting CO after balloon-expandable TAVR. The study sample consisted of 129 patients screened by

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty is reported to be effective for in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions; however, PCB failure has emerged as reccurent ISR after PCB angioplasty for ISR lesions. The long-term outcomes of repeated PCB angioplasty for PCB failure remain unclear. Between November

Residual stenosis and the heterogeneous tissue pattern are reported to be the risk factors of recurrent restenosis after paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR). Optimal coherence tomography (OCT) can assess the mechanism of restenosis. We

Stent fracture (SF) and peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation are reported to be associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR). We aimed to assess the impact of SF and PSS on TLR at 10 years after the procedure. Between 2002 and 2005, 972 patients (

The characteristics of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after two-stent implantation for left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions have been reported; however, the long term performance of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) on them is not well known. We performed DCB angioplasty in 47 ISR lesions

It is reported that peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) observed in the lesions treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) is associated with adverse event and chronic total occluded lesion was one of the risk factors of PSS. However, frequency and risk factors of PSS in chronic total occluded lesion