Search

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+R-) serostatus is independently associated with worse allograft and patient survival across solid organ transplant (SOT) types. We characterized trends in CMV D+R- serostatus among adult SOT recipients performed in the United States.Donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serostatus and demographic factors were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for persons ≥18 y undergoing a first SOT between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. The proportions of D+R- SOTs over time were assessed using Chi square for trend and modeled through 2040. Factors associated with D/R seropositivity were assessed using logistic models.Among 472 549 SOTs, the average proportion of D+R- SOTs increased significantly among kidney, liver, heart, and lung between 2000 to 2009 and 2010 to 2020: 18.0% to 18.3% (P = 0.034), 19.4% to 21.8% (P 0.001), 22.2% to 25.5% (P 0.001), and 23.6% to 27.0% (P 0.001), respectively. The increased proportion over time resulted from a disproportionate increase in R- (34.9% to 37.0% for all organ types, P 0.001) and a smaller corresponding change in D+ (60.8% to 60.3%, P 0.001).The proportion of high-risk CMV D+R- SOTs increased significantly across all organs and is projected to continue to increase. These findings inform population-level strategies to mitigate the negative impact of CMV D+R- in SOT.

Because of the continued demand in kidney transplantation, organs from donors with risk criteria for blood-borne viruses, high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys, and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive kidneys are being considered. There continues to be reluctance on the part of the providers and the candidates to accept HCV-positive kidneys.We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database of all adult (≥18 y old) recipients undergoing kidney transplant from May 10, 2013, to June 30, 2021. We compared patient and graft survival in candidates who received HCV-positive kidneys versus non-hepatitis C (Hep C) high KDPI kidneys by estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) groups.HCV-viremic kidneys were transplanted in 5.6% of patients in the EPTS61% group compared with 5.1% of patients in the 21%-60% EPTS group and 1.9% of 0%-20% EPTS group ( P0.001). Of all transplants performed in the EPTS 61%-100% group, 11.9% were KDPI85% compared with 5.2% in the EPTS 21%-60%, and 0.5% in the EPTS 0%-20%. Patient survival was significantly longer at 1, 3, and 5 y in the EPTS61% group who received Hep C-viremic or -nonviremic allografts compared with non-Hep C kidneys with KDPI85%. When it comes to listing, only 25% of candidates in the EPTS61% group were listed for Hep C nucleic acid testing-positive kidneys in 2021.Our findings could be used for counseling candidates on the types of kidneys they should consider for transplantation. Also, listing practices for viremic Hep C kidneys need continued re-evaluation.

To review and summarize the evolution of the Public Health Service (PHS) guidelines and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regulations for the prevention of blood borne virus transmission in solid organ transplant through the lens of popular culture, scientific evolution, patient and practitioner bias and outcomes research.The most recent set of guidelines and regulations were released in 2020 and represent a culmination of decades of opinion, research and debate within the scientific and lay communities.The guidelines were created to address public concern, and the risk of undiagnosed disease transmission in the context of the novel public health crisis of AIDS. We reviewed milestone publications from the scientific and lay press from the first description of AIDS in 1981 to the present to help illustrate the context in which the guidelines were created, the way they changed with subsequent editions, and offer critical consideration of issues with the current set of guidelines and a potential way forward. Further consideration should be given to the way in which the current guidelines identify donors with risk criteria for infectious disease transmission and mandate explanation of donor-specific risk factors to potential recipients, in our era of universal donor screening and recipient surveillance.

Background VGCV is approved for prophylaxis in adult KTRs at high risk for CMV disease (donor CMV-seropositive/recipient CMV-seronegative [D+/R-]); however, its use is limited by myelosuppression. LET is non-myelotoxic, does not require dose modification in renal impairment, and is approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. This randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 non-inferiority study (NCT03443869; MK-8228-002) evaluated CMV prophylaxis with LET vs. VGCV in adult CMV D+/R- KTRs. Methods Adult CMV D+/R- KTRs were randomized 1:1 within 7 days post-kidney transplant (KT) to receive either LET 480 mg QD (PO/IV) with acyclovir (400 mg PO BID, adjusted for renal function), or VGCV (900 mg PO QD, adjusted for renal function), through Week 28 post-KT and followed up through Week 52 post-KT. Randomization was stratified by use of lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants (pts) with CMV disease adjudicated by blinded committee through Week 52 post-KT (non-inferiority margin,10%). Results A total of 601 pts were randomized; 589 received ≥ 1 dose of study medication (median age [range], 51 [18–82] years; male, 72%; Black/African American, 9%; deceased donor, 60%; received lymphocyte-depleting induction immunosuppression, 46%), of whom two had detectable CMV viral DNA on Day 1 and one was CMV R+ (full analysis set, 586 pts). The proportion of pts with CMV disease through Week 52 post-KT was 10.4% with LET vs. 11.8% with VGCV (stratum-adjusted treatment difference, -1.4% [95% CI -6.5, 3.8]; Table 1). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 19.9% of pts with LET and 35.0% of pts with VGCV through Week 28 post-KT. The rate of discontinuations due to an AE was 4.1% in the LET arm and 13.5% in the VGCV arm (Table 2). The incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1000/µL) during the treatment phase was lower with LET than with VGCV (4.1% vs. 19.5%; difference, -15.4% [95% CI -20.7, -10.5]). Conclusion The study met its primary endpoint: LET was non-inferior to VGCV in preventing CMV disease in high-risk (CMV D+/R-) KTRs through Week 52 post-KT, and led to a lower rate of myelotoxicity than VGCV. Disclosures Ajit P. Limaye, MD, AiCuris: Advisor/Consultant|MedPace: Data Safety Monitoring Boards|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Novartis: Data Safety Monitoring Boards|Sana: Advisor/Consultant Klemens Budde, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|Abbvie: Honoraria|Alexion: Grant/Research Support|Alexion: Honoraria|Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Honoraria|Bristol Myers Squibb: Grant/Research Support|Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria|Chiesi: Grant/Research Support|Chiesi: Honoraria|CSL Behring: Grant/Research Support|CSL Behring: Honoraria|Fresenius: Grant/Research Support|Fresenius: Honoraria|Hansa: Grant/Research Support|Hansa: Honoraria|Hexal: Grant/Research Support|Hexal: Honoraria|Hookipa Biotech: Grant/Research Support|Hookipa Biotech: Honoraria|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Grant/Research Support|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria|Novartis: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: Honoraria|Otsuka: Grant/Research Support|Otsuka: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Honoraria|Sandoz: Grant/Research Support|Sandoz: Honoraria|Shire: Grant/Research Support|Shire: Honoraria|Siemens: Grant/Research Support|Siemens: Honoraria|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Honoraria|Veloxis: Grant/Research Support|Veloxis: Honoraria|Vitaeris: Grant/Research Support|Vitaeris: Honoraria Atul Humar, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant Julia Garcia-Diaz, MD, Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas Pharma US, Inc.: Speaker's Bureau Robert P. Carroll, BM BCh (Oxon), FRACP, DM (Oxon), Bristol Myers Squibb: Grant/Research Support|HANSA Biopharma: Advisor/Consultant Yoshihiko Murata, MD, PhD, Former employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.,: Stocks/Bonds Valerie L. Teal, MS, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.,: Current Employee|Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.,: Stocks/Bonds Christopher L. Gilbert, n/a, Current employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.,: Stocks/Bonds Barbara A. Haber, MD, Current employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.,: Stocks/Bonds.

BACKGROUND Risk factors, virological parameters, and outcomes associated with HHV-6 viremia in high-risk donor CMV-seropositive and recipient CMV-seronegative (D+R-) liver transplant recipients in the current era are incompletely defined. METHODS The study population consisted of patients in the preemptive therapy (PET) arm of a randomized, controlled trial of PET versus valganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV prevention in D+R- liver transplant recipients. Weekly blood samples through 100 d in the PET group were tested for HHV-6 viremia using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Assessments included virological characteristics and relationship with CMV, risk factors, and impact of HHV-6 viremia with outcomes through 12 mo posttransplant. RESULTS HHV-6 viremia at any level developed in 42% (40 of 96). Older patient age (P = 0.03), longer hospitalization (P = 0.015), and ICU stay at transplantation (P = 0.029) were significantly associated with high-grade viremia. Concurrent HHV-6 and CMV viremia was associated with earlier onset of HHV-6 viremia (P = 0.004), higher HHV-6 area under the curve (P = 0.043), and higher peak HHV-6 viral load (P = 0.006) versus HHV-6 viremia alone. High-grade viremia was independently associated with biopsy-proven rejection within 12 mo (P = 0.045) posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS Among D+R- liver transplant recipients receiving valganciclovir as PET, high-grade HHV-6 viremia was associated with increased age and critical illness in ICU at time of transplant and was independently associated with allograft rejection.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegative solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Assays for EBV serostatus assess antibody to both EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1), but PTLD risk among SOT recipients with discordant VCA and EBNA-1 results is unknown.We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study to determine the risk of PTLD among adult (≥ 18 years) SOTRs with discordant pre-transplant VCA and EBNA-1 IgG compared to that of SOTRs with concordantly negative or concordantly positive serology using univariable and multivariable Cox-proportional hazards models.Of 4106 SOTRs, the number (%) who were concordantly positive, concordantly negative, and discordant was 3787 (92.2%), 149 (3.6%), and 170 (4.2%), respectively. The adjusted hazard of PTLD was significantly higher among discordant SOTRs compared to concordantly positive SOTRs (aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.04-6.6, p =.04) and lower compared to concordantly negative SOTRs (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.76, p.001). The adjusted hazard of EBV+ PTLD among those with discordant serology was also significantly higher compared to the concordantly positive cohort (aHR 3.53, 95% CI 1.04-12.0, p =.04) and significantly lower compared to the concordantly negative cohort (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.82, p =.02).Risk of PTLD among SOTRs with discordant VCA and EBNA-1 may be intermediate between those with concordantly positive and negative serology. If confirmed in future studies, revision of national EBV serology reporting to include both VCA and EBNA results may be needed to optimize PTLD risk stratification.

Introduction Most studies of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with COVID-19 focus on outcomes within one month of illness onset. Delayed mortality in SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 has not been fully examined. Methods We used data from a multicenter registry to calculate mortality by 90 days following initial SARS-CoV-2 detection in SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 and developed multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to compare risk factors for death by days 28 and 90. Results Vital status at day 90 was available for 936 of 1117 (84%) SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19: 190 of 936 (20%) died by 28 days and an additional 56 of 246 deaths (23%) occurred between days 29 and 90. Factors associated with mortality by day 90 included: age > 65 years [aHR 1.8 (1.3-2.4), p = Conclusions In SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19, >20% of deaths occurred between 28 and 90 days following SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Future investigations should consider extending follow-up duration to 90 days for more complete mortality assessment

In this article, the editors of Clinical Infectious Diseases review some of the most important lessons they have learned about the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify essential questions about COVID-19 that remain to be answered., This article reviews important lessons learned to this day, October 15, 2020, about the epidemiology, clinical virology, presentation, complications, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identifies essential questions about the COVID-19 pandemic that remain to be answered.

Background The relative costs of preemptive therapy (PET) or prophylaxis for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk donor CMV-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R−) liver transplant recipients have not been assessed in the context of a randomized trial. Methods A decision tree model was constructed based on the probability of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial that compared valganciclovir as PET or prophylaxis for 100 days in 205 D+/R− liver transplant recipients. Itemized costs for each site were obtained from a federal cost transparency database. Total costs included costs of implementation of the strategy and CMV disease treatment-related costs. Net cost per patient was estimated from the decision tree for each strategy. Results PET was associated with a 10% lower absolute rate of CMV disease (9% vs 19%). The cost of treating a case of CMV disease in our patients was $88 190. Considering cost of implementation of strategy and treatment-related cost for CMV disease, the net cost-savings per patient associated with PET was $8707 compared to prophylaxis. PET remained cost-effective across a range of assumptions (varying costs of monitoring and treatment, and rates of disease). Conclusions PET is the dominant CMV prevention strategy in that it was associated with lower rates of CMV disease and lower overall costs compared to prophylaxis in D+/R− liver transplant recipients. Costs were driven primarily by more hospitalizations and higher CMV disease–associated costs due to delayed onset postprophylaxis disease in the prophylaxis group.

In the context of a rapidly evolving pandemic, multiple organizations have released guidelines stating that all organs from potential deceased donors with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection should be deferred, including from otherwise medically eligible donors found to have mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 discovered on routine donor screening. In this article, we critically examine the available data on the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through organ transplantation. The isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from nonlung clinical specimens, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in autopsy specimens, previous experience with the related coronaviruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and the vast experience with other common RNA respiratory viruses are all addressed. Taken together, these data provide little evidence to suggest the presence of intact transmissible SARS-CoV in organs that can potentially be transplanted, specifically liver and heart. Other considerations including ethical, financial, societal, and logistical concerns are also addressed. We conclude that, for selected patients with high waitlist mortality, transplant programs should consider accepting heart or liver transplants from deceased donors with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has been described in adults with critical illness caused by diverse etiologies, especially severe sepsis, and observational studies have linked CMV reactivation with worse clinical outcomes in this setting. In this study, we review observational clinical data linking development of CMV reactivation with worse outcomes in patients in the intensive care unit, discuss potential biologically plausible mechanisms for a causal association, and summarize results of initial interventional trials that examined the effects of CMV prevention. These data, taken together, highlight the need for a randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial (1) to definitively determine whether prevention of CMV reactivation improves clinical outcomes of patients with critical illness and (2) to define the underlying mechanism(s).

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has been associated with hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the natural history of HC and factors associated with the clinical course are incompletely understood. We retrospectively analyzed allogeneic HCT patients transplanted from 2007-2017 who presented after platelet engraftment or after day 28 post-HCT with BKPyV-associated HC (BKPyV-HC), which was defined as a positive urine BKPyV PCR, ≥1 plasma BKPyV viral load result, and macroscopic hematuria (Bedi grade ≥2). Factors associated with resolution of macroscopic hematuria and resolution of all cystitis symptoms within 90 days after HC diagnosis were investigated in multivariable models. In 128 patients with BKPyV-HC, the median times from diagnosis to resolution of all symptoms, macroscopic hematuria, and urinary clots (present in 55% [71/128]) were 24 days (15-44), 17 days (10-30), and 14 days (5-26), respectively. Ninety percent of patients had BKPyV viremia at the onset of HC with a median viral load of 1850 copies/mL (interquartile range, 240-8550). In multivariable models, high plasma viral load (≥10 000 copies/mL) and cytopenias at the beginning of BKPyV-HC were significantly associated with longer macroscopic hematuria and cystitis symptoms. Use of cidofovir was not associated with shorter duration of illness. In conclusion, BKPyV-HC after allogeneic HCT is characterized by prolonged and severe symptoms and requires improved management strategies. High-grade viremia and cytopenias were associated with a longer duration of BKPyV-associated HC. Accurate descriptions of disease and factors associated with prolonged recovery will inform end points of future clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Respiratory viral infections can increase the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation, but the mechanisms are unknown. In this study, we determined whether symptomatic respiratory viral infections after lung transplantation induce circulating exosomes that contain lung-associated self-antigens and assessed whether these exosomes activate immune responses to self-antigens. METHODS Serum samples were collected from lung transplant recipients with symptomatic lower- and upper-tract respiratory viral infections and from non-symptomatic stable recipients. Exosomes were isolated via ultracentrifugation; purity was determined using sucrose cushion; and presence of lung self-antigens, 20S proteasome, and viral antigens for rhinovirus, coronavirus, and respiratory syncytial virus were determined using immunoblot. Mice were immunized with circulating exosomes from each group and resulting differential immune responses and lung histology were analyzed. RESULTS Exosomes containing self-antigens, 20S proteasome, and viral antigens were detected at significantly higher levels (p < 0.05) in serum of recipients with symptomatic respiratory viral infections (n = 35) as compared with stable controls (n = 32). Mice immunized with exosomes from recipients with respiratory viral infections developed immune responses to self-antigens, fibrosis, small airway occlusion, and significant cellular infiltration; mice immunized with exosomes from controls did not (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Circulating exosomes isolated from lung transplant recipients diagnosed with respiratory viral infections contained lung self-antigens, viral antigens, and 20S proteasome and elicited immune responses to lung self-antigens that resulted in development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in immunized mice.

Lung transplant recipients (LTR) with Covid-19 may have higher mortality than non-lung solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), but direct comparisons are limited. Risk factors for mortality specifically in LTR have not been explored. We performed a multicenter cohort study of adult SOTR with Covid-19 to compare mortality by 28-days between hospitalized LTR and non-lung SOTR. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality among LTR vs. non-lung SOTR and to determine risk factors for death in LTR. Of 1,616 SOTR with Covid-19, 1,051 (65%) were hospitalized including 117/159 (74%) LTR and 934/1457 (64%) non-lung SOTR (p=0.02). Mortality was higher among LTR compared to non-lung SOTR (24% vs. 16%, respectively, p=0.035) and lung transplant was independently associated with death after adjusting for age and comorbidities (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, p=0.05). Among LTR, independent risk factors for mortality included single lung transplant (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.7, p=0.04) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.0-12.4, p=0.05), but not age >65 years, heart failure, or obesity. Among SOTR hospitalized for Covid-19, LTR had higher mortality than non-lung SOTR. In LTR, single lung transplant and chronic allograft dysfunction were independently associated with mortality.

Among solid organ transplant recipients, donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive (D+) and recipient seronegative (R-) status are associated with an increased risk of graft loss and mortality after kidney or lung transplantation. Whether a similar relationship exists among liver transplant recipients (LTR) is unknown. We assessed graft loss and mortality among adult LTRs from January 1, 2010, to March 14, 2020, in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. We used multivariable mixed Cox proportional hazards regression to analyze the association of donor and recipient CMV serostatus group with graft loss and mortality, with donor seronegative (D-) and recipient seronegative (R-) as the reference group. Among 54,078 LTRs, the proportion of D-R-, D- and recipient seropositive (R+), D+R-, and D+R+ was 13.4%, 22.5%, 22%, and 42%, respectively. By unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimates, survival by the end of follow-up was 73.3%, 73.5%, 70.1%, and 69.7%, among the D-R-, D-R+, D+R-, and D+R+ groups, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression, the CMV D+R- serogroup, but not other serogroups, was independently associated with increased risks of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.22) and mortality (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22). The magnitude of the association of the CMV D+R- serostatus group with mortality was similar when the Cox regression analysis was restricted to the first year after transplant and beyond the first year after transplant: aHR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.01-1.27) and aHR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.02-1.25), respectively. Even in an era of CMV preventive strategies, CMV D+R- serogroup status remains independently associated with increased graft loss and mortality in adult LTRs. Factors in addition to direct CMV-associated short-term mortality are likely, and studies to define the underlying mechanism(s) are warranted.

Few options are available for cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in transplant recipients resistant, refractory, or intolerant to approved agents. Letermovir (LET) is approved for prophylaxis in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, but little is known about efficacy in CMV infection. We conducted an observational study to determine the patterns of use and outcome of LET treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients.Patients who received LET for treatment of CMV infection were identified at 13 transplant centers. Demographic and outcome data were collected.Twenty-seven solid organ and 21 HCT recipients (one dual) from 13 medical centers were included. Forty-five of 47 (94%) were treated with other agents prior to LET, and 57% had a history of prior CMV disease. Seventy-seven percent were intolerant to other antivirals; 32% were started on LET because of resistance concerns. Among 37 patients with viral load 1000 international units (IU)/ml at LET initiation, two experienced 1 log rise in viral load by week 12, and no deaths were attributed to CMV. Ten patients had viral load 1000 IU/ml at LET initiation, and six of 10 (60%) had a CMV viral load 1000 IU/ml at completion of therapy or last known value. LET was discontinued in two patients for an adverse event.Patients treated with LET with viral load 1000 IU/ml had good virologic outcomes. Outcomes were mixed when LET was initiated at higher viral loads. Further studies on combination therapy or alternative LET dosing are needed.

T cell immunity is essential for the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation. We evaluated a CMV-specific peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay to determine whether assay results could predict subsequent CMV events. Adult kidney transplant recipients at 43 centers underwent ELISPOT testing to enumerate interferon gamma (IFN-γ) binding spot-forming units (sfu) after stimulation of cells with an overlapping peptide pool of CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) and immediate early-1 (IE-1) protein at the end of antiviral prophylaxis (EOP) and various time points thereafter. The primary outcome was a CMV event in the first posttransplant year. In 583 kidney transplant recipients (260 seropositive donor [D+]/seronegative recipient [R-] and 277 R+), CMV events occurred in 44 of 368 eligible patients (11.8%) at a median of 227 days (range 92-360) posttransplant. A cutoff value of >40 sfu/2.5 × 105 cells for either IE-1 or pp65 was derived as a threshold for positivity, with a negative predictive value of >97% for CMV events. CMV events were significantly lower in assay positive vs assay negative patients (3.0% vs 19.5%, P 40 at EOP (P

The differential impact of preemptive therapy (PET) and antiviral prophylaxis (AP) on development of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific neutralizing antibody (nAb) and T-cell responses have not previously been directly compared in high-risk donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+R−) organ transplant recipients. We prospectively assessed T-cell and nAb responses 3 months after transplantation in cohorts of high-risk D+R− liver transplant recipients who received either PET (n = 15) or AP (n = 25) and a control group of CMV-seropositive transplant recipients (R+) (AP; n = 24). CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65)– and immediate early protein 1–specific multifunctional T-cell responses were determined by means of intracellular cytokine staining and nAbs against BADrUL131-Y4 CMV in adult retinal pigment epithelial cell line-19 human epithelial cells; nAbs were detected in 8 of 12 (67%) in the PET group, none of 17 in the AP group, and 20 of 22 (91%) in the R+ group. Multifunctional CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses to pp65 were generally similar between PET and R+ groups, and lower for the AP group; multifunctional CD4 responses were similar across all groups. Among D+R− liver transplant recipients, PET was associated with the development of greater nAb and multifunctional CD8 T-cell responses compared with AP, providing a potential mechanism to explain the relative protection against late-onset disease with PET. Future studies are needed to define specific immune parameters predictive of late-onset CMV disease with AP.

Transplant tourism, the practice of traveling to other countries for transplantation, continues to be a major problem worldwide. We describe a patient who traveled to Pakistan and underwent commercial kidney transplantation. He developed life-threatening infections from New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1-producing Enterobacter cloacae and Rhizopus oryzae resulting in a necrotizing kidney allograft infection and subsequent external iliac artery rupture. He survived after a prolonged course of non-standardized antimicrobial therapy, including a combination of aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam, and aggressive surgical debridement with allograft nephrectomy. The early timing of infection with these unusual organisms localized to the allograft suggests contamination and substandard care at the time of transplant. This case highlights the challenges of caring for these infections and serves as a cautionary tale for the potential complications of commercial transplant tourism.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs in roughly one-third of immunocompetent patients during critical illness, and is associated with worse outcomes. These outcomes have prompted consideration of early antiviral prophylaxis, but two-third of patients would receive unnecessary treatment. Tissue viral load has been associated with risk of reactivation in murine models, and recent work has suggested a relationship between immune responses to CMV and underlying viral load. We, therefore, sought to confirm the hypothesis that serum CMV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) correlates with tissue viral load, and might be used to predict the risk of reactivation during critical illness. We confirm that there is a good correlation between tissue viral load and serum CMV-specific IgG after laboratory infection of inbred mice. Further, we show that naturally infected outbred hosts have variable tissue viral DNA loads that do not correlate well with serum IgG. Perhaps as a consequence, CMV-specific IgG was not predictive of reactivation events in immunocompetent humans. When reactivation did occur, those with the lowest IgG levels had longer durations of reactivation, but IgG quartiles were not associated with differing peak DNAemia. Together our data suggest that CMV-specific IgG titers diverge from tissue viral loads in outbred immunocompetent hosts, and their importance for the control of reactivation events remains unclear.

Background Studies of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) hospitalized for Covid-19 have focused on short-term outcomes with approximately 30 days of follow-up time. Intermediate-term mortality and associated risk factors for intermediate-term death have not previously been reported. Methods Using data from a multi-center registry, we assessed mortality by 90 days among SOTr hospitalized for Covid-19 between 3/1/2020 and 12/31/2020. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models were used to compare risk factors for mortality by 28 and 90 days. Covariates were selected a priori based on known predictors of death in SOTr hospitalized for Covid-19. All patients were followed for 90 days or were censored at the time of death or last clinical contact, if this occurred prior to day 90 after diagnosis. Results Among SOTr hospitalized for Covid-19, 198/979 (20%) died within 90 days of diagnosis and 37/198 (19%) of deaths occurred between days 29 and 90. Risk factors for mortality by day 90 days included age >65 years (1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4, P< 0.001), lung transplant (compared to non-lung) (1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4, P=0.02), chronic lung disease (2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.4, P=0.002) and heart failure (1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9), which were similar to risk factors reported for 28-day mortality (Table 1). Diagnosis during the second half of 2020 (6/20-12/31/20) was associated with lower mortality by 28 days (aHR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0, P=0.03) compared to diagnosis during the early half of 2020 (3/1-6/19/20); however, mortality by 90 days was similar in the late and early time periods (aHR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.2, P=0.54). Obesity and mTOR inhibitor use were also associated with death by 28 but not 90 days. Kaplan-Meier survival curves by time period of diagnosis are shown in Figure 1. Table 1. Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Model for Mortality at 28 and 90-days Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Hospitalized for Covid-19 (N=979) Figure 1. Survival among SOT recipients hospitalized for Covid-19 by diagnosis time period Vertical tick marks represent censored cases. Early 2020 refers to cases diagnosed between March 1 and June 19, 2020 and late 2020 refers to cases diagnosed between June 20 and December 31, 2020. Conclusion Approximately 20% of deaths among SOTr hospitalized for Covid-19 occurred between days 29 and 90. Future investigations are required to discern the mechanism(s) for the improvement in early, but not late, mortality among SOTr with Covid-19 during the course of the pandemic. Disclosures Madeleine R. Heldman, MD, Cigna Lifesource (Other Financial or Material Support, Speaking honoraria)Thermo Fisher Scientific (Other Financial or Material Support, Speaking honoraria) Olivia S. Kates, MD, Merk (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Ajit P. Limaye, MD, astellas (Scientific Research Study Investigator)CTI (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK (Consultant)Johnson&Johnson (Other Financial or Material Support, Adjudication Committee)merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)moderna (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Novartis (Other Financial or Material Support, DMC member)Novo Nordisk (Consultant)

Background Detailed cytomegalovirus (CMV) kinetics in donor CMV-seropositive, recipient CMV-seronegative (D+/R–) transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy (PET) have not been fully defined. Methods The study population consisted of the PET arm of a randomized CMV prevention trial in D+/R– liver transplant recipients. CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were performed weekly for 100 days using a sensitive assay. Viral load and clinical parameters were compared for patients with or without high-level increase (defined as higher than the group median log10 increase in viral load from baseline after PET initiation). Results Among 79 patients, 93.6% (74/79) developed an increase from baseline viral loads of median 120 IU/mL to 3350 IU/mL; 25.7% (19/74) of the patients had peak levels >10 000 IU/mL. None of the patients with rise in viral load underwent testing for CMV resistance, and viremia resolved with PET with valganciclovir. Patients with high-level increase in viral load had a significantly lower rate of recurrent viremia than those without such increase (16/40 [40%] vs 28/39 [71.8%], respectively; P = .004). Conclusions A majority of D+/R– recipients had a marked increase in viral load after initiation of PET before resolution of viremia. This phenomenon is associated with lower rates of subsequent recurrent viremia and does not necessarily imply antiviral resistance.

Background and aims Despite concerns that liver transplant (LT) recipients may be at increased risk of unfavorable outcomes from COVID-19 due the high prevalence of co-morbidities, immunosuppression and ageing, a detailed analysis of their effects in large studies is lacking Methods Data from adult LT recipients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection were collected across Europe. All consecutive patients with symptoms were included in the analysis, Results Between March 1st and June 27th2020, data from 243 adult symptomatic cases from 36 centers and 9 countries were collected. Thirty-nine (16%) were managed as outpatients while 204 (84%) required hospitalization including admission to the ICU (39/204, 19.1%). Forty-nine (20.2%) patients died after a median of 13.5 (10-23) days, respiratory failure was the major cause. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, age > 70 (HR 4.16; 95%CI 1.78-9.73) had a negative effect and tacrolimus (TAC) use (HR 0.55; 95%CI 0.31-0.99) had a positive independent effect on survival. The role of co-morbidities was strongly influenced by the dominant effect of age where comorbidities increased with the increasing age of the recipients. In a second model excluding age, both diabetes (HR 1.95; 95%CI 1.06 - 3.58) and chronic kidney disease (HR 1.97; 95%CI 1.05 - 3.67) emerged as associated with death Conclusions Twenty-five per cent of patients requiring hospitalization for Covid-19 died, the risk being higher in patients older than 70 and with medical co-morbidities, such as impaired renal function and diabetes. Conversely, the use of TAC was associated with a better survival thus encouraging clinicians to keep TAC at the usual dose., Graphical abstract

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Background. Risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in CMV seropositive liver transplant recipients are incompletely defined and have focused primarily on recipient factors. We hypothesized that active CMV replication (CMV viremia) in seropositive donors might increase the risk for CMV viremia in recipients, as reported for other viruses in organ transplantation. Methods. From January 3, 2009, to July 27, 2015, stored plasma from consecutive CMV seropositive liver donors was retrospectively tested for CMV viremia by PCR. From April 20, 2012, to July 27, 2015, CMV seropositive recipients of a liver transplant from the donors during this time period received preemptive therapy for CMV prevention (valganciclovir therapy for CMV viremia ≥250 IU/mL). The association of recipient factors and donor CMV viremia with viremia in recipients was assessed. Results. Among 317 CMV-seropositive donors, CMV viremia was detected in 11 (3.5%) and was associated with longer time to collection after admission and bacteremia. Among 115 CMV-seropositive liver recipients, 5 (4.3%) received an organ from a donor with CMV viremia. Donor CMV viremia was independently associated with higher incidence of CMV viremia ≥250 IU/mL and shorter time to onset of CMV viremia ≥250 IU/mL in recipients: 4 (80%) versus 26 (23.6%), P = 0.02, and hazard ratio 8.55 (2.60–28.10), P = 0.003, respectively. Conclusion. Donor CMV reactivation is associated with CMV viremia in seropositive orthotopic liver transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy, identifying a novel potential risk factor for CMV infection in seropositive liver transplant recipients. Future studies should independently validate and assess these findings in other organ transplant settings.

Blood culture (BC) often fails to detect bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis. However, molecular diagnostics hold great potential. The molecular method PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) can detect DNA from hundreds of different microorganisms in whole blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this method in a multicenter study including 16 teaching hospitals in the United States (n = 13) and Europe (n = 3)., Blood culture (BC) often fails to detect bloodstream microorganisms in sepsis. However, molecular diagnostics hold great potential. The molecular method PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) can detect DNA from hundreds of different microorganisms in whole blood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of this method in a multicenter study including 16 teaching hospitals in the United States (n = 13) and Europe (n = 3). First, on testing of 2,754 contrived whole blood samples, with or without spiked microorganisms, PCR/ESI-MS produced 99.1% true-positive and 97.2% true-negative results. Second, among 1,460 patients with suspected sepsis (sepsis-2 definition), BC and PCR/ESI-MS on whole blood were positive in 14.6% and 25.6% of cases, respectively, with the following result combinations: BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 4.3%; BC positive and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 10.3%; BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS positive, 15.3%; and BC negative and PCR/ESI-MS negative, 70.1%. Compared with BC, PCR/ESI-MS showed the following sensitivities (coagulase-negative staphylococci not included): Gram-positive bacteria, 58%; Gram-negative bacteria, 78%; and Candida species, 83%. The specificities were >94% for all individual species. Patients who had received prior antimicrobial medications (n = 603) had significantly higher PCR/ESI-MS positivity rates than patients without prior antimicrobial treatment—31% versus 22% (P

Background The risk factors for development of viremia in high-risk donor cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive and recipient CMV-seronegative (D+R−) transplant recipients are incompletely defined. Methods The study population comprised patients in the preemptive therapy (PET) arm of a randomized, controlled trial of PET versus prophylaxis using valganciclovir in D+R− liver transplant recipients. Weekly surveillance monitoring for viremia for 100 days was performed using a sensitive CMV-DNA polymerase chain reaction assays. Risk factors for viremia and time to onset (≤4 vs >4 weeks) of viremia were examined using logistic regression models. Results Viremia developed in 84% (79/94) of recipients and older donor age was the only independent factor associated with viremia (odds ratio, 2.20 for each quartile increase in donor age; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–4.52; P = .031). Recipients who developed early-onset viremia (within 4 weeks) also had significantly older donors than those with later-onset viremia (difference in age 10.1 years; 95% CI, 2–19; P = .03). Conclusions Older donor age was an independent predictor of viremia and earlier-onset of viremia in D+R− liver transplant recipients. Future studies should assess the mechanistic links underlying this novel association. Clinical Trial Registration NCT01552369.

We performed multivariable analysis of potential risk factors (including cytomegalovirus [CMV] reactivation) for clinical outcomes by day 28 (death or continued hospitalization, ventilator-free days, intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, hospital-free days) from pooled cohorts of 2 previous prospective studies of CMV-seropositive adults with sepsis. CMV reactivation at any level, >100 IU/mL, >1000 IU/mL, peak viral load, and area under the curve were independently associated with the clinical outcomes. We identified the potential effect size of CMV on outcomes that could be used as end points for future interventional trials of CMV prevention using antiviral prophylaxis in ICU patients with sepsis.

Universal screening of potential organ donors and recipients for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now recommended prior to transplantation in the United States during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Challenges have included limited testing capacity, short windows of organ viability, brief lead time for notification of potential organ recipients, and the need to test lower respiratory donor specimens to optimize sensitivity. In an early U.S. epicenter of the outbreak, we designed and implemented a system to expedite this testing and the results here from the first 3 weeks. The process included a Laboratory Medicine designee for communication with organ recovery and transplant clinical staff, specialized sample labeling and handoff, and priority processing. Thirty-two organs recovered from 14 of 17 screened donors were transplanted vs 70 recovered from 23 donors during the same period in 2019. No pretransplant or organ donors tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Median turnaround time from specimen receipt was 6.8 hours (donors), 6.5 hours (recipients): 4.5 hours faster than daily inpatient median. No organ recoveries or transplantations were disrupted by a lack of SARS-CoV-2 testing. Waitlist inactivations for COVID-19 precautions were reduced in our region. Systems that include specialized ordering pathways and adequate testing capacity can support continued organ transplantation, even in a SARS-CoV-2 hyperendemic area.

With the rapidly expanding pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, there is concern that solid organ transplant recipients will be particularly vulnerable to infection and may experience a more severe clinical course. We report four cases of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients including recipients of kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplants. We describe each patient's medical history including transplantation history, their clinical presentation and workup, and their course from diagnosis to either hospital discharge or to improvement in symptoms. These reports demonstrate a range of symptoms, clinical severity, and disease course in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, including two hospitalized patients and two patients managed entirely in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND Exosomes isolated from plasma of lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) contain human leukocyte antigens and lung self-antigens (SAgs), K-alpha 1 tubulin (Kα1T) and collagen type V (Col-V). The aim was to determine the use of circulating exosomes with lung SAgs as a biomarker for BOS. METHODS Circulating exosomes were isolated retrospectively from plasma from LTxRs at diagnosis of BOS and at 6 and 12 months before the diagnosis (n = 41) and from stable time-matched controls (n = 30) at 2 transplant centers by ultracentrifugation. Exosomes were validated using Nanosight, and lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) were detected by immunoblot and semiquantitated using ImageJ software. RESULTS Circulating exosomes from BOS and stable LTxRs demonstrated 61- to 181-nm vesicles with markers Alix and CD9. Exosomes from LTxRs with BOS (n = 21) showed increased levels of lung SAgs compared with stable (n = 10). A validation study using 2 separate cohorts of LTxRs with BOS and stable time-matched controls from 2 centers also demonstrated significantly increased lung SAgs–containing exosomes at 6 and 12 months before BOS. CONCLUSIONS Circulating exosomes isolated from LTxRs with BOS demonstrated increased levels of lung SAgs (Kα1T and Col-V) 12 months before the diagnosis (100% specificity and 90% sensitivity), indicating that circulating exosomes with lung SAgs can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for identifying LTxRs at risk for BOS.

IMPORTANCE: Despite the use of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention strategy of antiviral prophylaxis for high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors, high rates of delayed-onset postprophylaxis CMV disease occur. An alternate approach, preemptive therapy (initiation of antiviral therapy for early asymptomatic CMV viremia detected by surveillance testing), has not previously been directly compared with antiviral prophylaxis in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare preemptive therapy with antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors for the prevention of CMV disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial of preemptive therapy vs antiviral prophylaxis in 205 CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors aged older than 18 years. The trial was conducted at 6 academic transplant centers in the United States between October 2012 and June 2017, with last follow-up in June 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either preemptive therapy (valganciclovir, 900 mg, twice daily until 2 consecutive negative tests a week apart) for viremia detected by weekly plasma CMV polymerase chain reaction for 100 days (n = 100) or valganciclovir, 900 mg, daily for 100 days as antiviral prophylaxis (n = 105). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was incidence of CMV disease by 12 months, defined as CMV syndrome (CMV viremia and clinical or laboratory findings) or end-organ disease. Secondary outcomes included acute allograft rejection, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and neutropenia. RESULTS: Among 205 patients who were randomized (mean age, 55 years; 62 women [30%]), all 205 (100%) completed the trial. The incidence of CMV disease was significantly lower with preemptive therapy than antiviral prophylaxis (9% [9/100] vs 19% [20/105]; difference, 10% [95% CI, 0.5% to 19.6%]; P = .04]). The incidence of allograft rejection (28% vs 25%; difference, 3% [95% CI, −9% to 15%]), opportunistic infections (25% vs 27%; difference, 2% [95% CI, −14% to 10%]), graft loss (2% vs 2%; difference