Search

Purpose: Evaluate the safety/efficacy of novel potassium binders (patiromer, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate [SZ-9]) for early postoperative hyperkalemia following kidney transplantation., Methods: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study of deceased-donor kidney recipients transplanted between 1/2018 and 12/2020. Potassium-binder use was evaluated from immediately posttransplant until discharge. Potassium binders were administered ≥2 hours before/after medications., Results: A total of 179 patients were included, 24 (13%) of whom received potassium binders (16 [67%] patiromer, 7 [29%] SZ-9, 1 [4%] both) for a mean of 2.5 (±3.18) doses. Peak potassium levels were higher in the potassium-binder group (6.05 vs 5.35 mEq/L; P < .001). More patients on potassium binders transitioned to atovaquone than those on no binders (n = 21 [100%] vs n = 112 [75%], respectively; P = .005). Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 100 (56%) patients, with a higher proportion receiving potassium binders (18 [75%] vs 82 [53%], respectively; P = .042). There was no difference between groups in number of posttransplant dialysis sessions required in the general study population (P = .2), nor in the DGF group (P = .12). No difference was noted in the incidence of ileus (P = .2), or gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting; P = .6). Of the 24 patients who received inpatient binders, 9 (37.5%) were discharged and remained on them for a mean of 46 (±49) days., Conclusion: Patiromer and SZ-9 appear safe in the early posttransplant period, but larger prospective trials are needed. Potassium-binder use does not appear to be associated with fewer dialysis sessions in DGF patients, however, they may be used as additional tools for lowering potassium in these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Maria Ajaimy reports statistical analysis was provided by Montefiore Medical Center. Maria Ajaimy reports a relationship with Montefiore Medical Center that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The pharmacokinetic implications of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) use on tacrolimus posttransplant are unknown. This study sought to investigate the effects of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), a CYP3A4 substrate and inhibitor, on weight-adjusted tacrolimus (FK) trough/dose ratio (T/D) following heart or kidney transplantation., Material and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative heart or kidney transplant recipients who received 12 weeks of G/P therapy. Weight-adjusted T/D was assessed while patients were at steady-state before, during, and after G/P treatment. Forty-one HCV negative recipients (three heart, 38 kidney) were evaluated., Results: The weight-adjusted T/D significantly increased during G/P treatment (119.31, IQR 88-173.8) compared to before G/P treatment (67.4, IQR 53.4-115.9) (p < 0.01), but decreased after completion of treatment (90.1, IQR 52.9-122.7) (p < 0.01). There was no difference in weight-adjusted T/D before and after G/P treatment (p = 0.42). Four patients experienced acute rejection., Conclusion: Initiation of G/P in heart or kidney transplant recipients induces a reversible change in tacrolimus metabolism. A 33%-50% tacrolimus dose reduction may be considered at the time of G/P initiation. Regardless of tacrolimus dose adjustment, tacrolimus trough levels should be monitored 3 days after initiation of G/P. No clear relationship between HCV viremic organ transplantation and rejection risk was found. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: We compared clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) for small renal masses (SRM) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before or after transplant at a high-volume urologic and transplant center., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with ESRD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <15 mL/min) who underwent RN for suspected malignant SRM from 2000-2018. Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent RN after transplant; group 2 underwent RN prior to transplant, and group 3 underwent RN without subsequent transplant. Dominant tumor size and histopathological characteristics, recurrence, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare categorical and continuous baseline and histopathologic characteristics, respectively. Univariate analysis and log rank test were used to compare RCC recurrence rates., Results: We identified 34 nephrectomies in group 1, 27 nephrectomies in group 2, and 70 nephrectomies in group 3. Median time from transplant to SRM radiological diagnosis in group 1 was 87 months, and three months from diagnosis to nephrectomy for all groups. There were no statistically significant differences between pathological dominant mass size, histological subtype breakdown, grade, or stage between the groups. Rates of benign histology were similar between the groups. Univariate analysis did not reveal a statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the groups (p=0.9)., Conclusions: Patients undergoing nephrectomy before or after transplant for SRM have similar indolent clinicopathological characteristics and low recurrence rates. Our results suggest that chronic immunosuppression does not adversely affect SRM biology.

COVID-19 has significantly affected the transplant community, by leading to decreased transplant activity and increased waiting list time. As expected, COVID-19 causes substantial mortality in both ESKD and kidney transplant populations. This is due to underlying CKD and a high prevalence of comorbid conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease in this group. Transplant programs have faced the difficult decision of weighing the risks and benefits of transplantation during the pandemic. On one hand, there is a risk of COVID-19 exposure leading to infection while patients are on maximum immunosuppression. Alternatively, there are risks of delaying transplantation, which will increase waitlist times and may lead to waitlist-associated morbidity and mortality. Cautious and thoughtful selection of both the recipient's and donor's post-transplant management has been required during the pandemic, to mitigate the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. In this review article, we aimed to discuss previous publications related to clinical outcomes of COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients, patients with ESKD on dialysis, or on the transplant waiting list, and the precautions transplant centers should take in decision making for recipient and donor selection and immunosuppressive management during the pandemic. Nevertheless, transplantation in this milieu does seem to be the correct decision, with careful patient and donor selection and safeguard protocols for infection prevention. Each center should conduct risk assessment on the basis of the patient's age and medical comorbidities, waitlist time, degree of sensitization, cold ischemia time, status of vaccination, and severity of pandemic in their region., Competing Interests: All authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) in the setting of end-stage renal disease offers unmatched outcomes in insulin dependent diabetic patients. Donor pool expansion through the transplantation of kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial., Methods: 59 SPK transplants were classified by presence of donor AKI, defined as donor terminal creatinine ≥ 1.5x the initial creatinine or donor terminal creatinine > 4.0 mg/dL. Endpoints included graft and patient survival, delayed graft function (DGF), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and acute rejection., Results: The donor AKI group (n = 35) had significantly higher rates of DGF (38 v. 9%, p = 0.01). There was no difference in creatinine or GFR at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. HbA1c was comparable at 3, 6 and 12 months. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients that required anti-diabetic agents after transplant (14 v. 4%, p = 0.56)., Conclusions: We observed increased rates of DGF in SPK recipients with donor AKI. However, equivalent outcomes of pancreas and kidney function in both groups were observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has created an avenue for transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). The donor transmission of HCV is then countered by DAA administration during the post-operative period. However, initiation of DAA treatment is ultimately dictated by insurance companies., Methods: A retrospective chart review of 52 D+/R- kidney recipients who underwent DAA treatment post-transplant was performed. Patients were grouped according to their prescription coverage plans, managed by either commercial or government pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs)., Results: Thirty-nine patients had government PBMs and 13 had commercial PBMs. Demographics were similar between the two groups. All patients developed HCV viremia, but cleared the virus after treatment with DAA. Patients with government PBMs were treated earlier compared to those with commercial PBMs (11 days vs 26 days, P = .01). Longer time to DAA initiation resulted in higher peak viral loads (β = 0.39, R 2  = .15, P = .01) and longer time to HCV viral load clearance (β = 0.41, R 2  = .17, P = .01)., Conclusions: D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access. However, treatment can be profoundly delayed by a third-party payer authorization process that may be subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and worsened outcomes., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Kidney allocation system allows blood type B candidates accept kidneys from A2/A2B donors. There is no mandate by UNOS on which the anti-A2 level is acceptable. We aimed to investigate the safety of kidney transplant in blood group B patients with anti-A2 titers ≤16., Methods: We performed 41 A2-incompatible kidney transplants in blood group B recipients between May 2015 and September 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared with a control group of 75 blood group B recipients who received blood group compatible kidney transplantation at the same period., Results: Of the 41 recipients, 85% were male, 48% African American, with a median age of 53 (20-73) y. Thirty-eight (93%) were deceased-donor and 3 (7%) were living-donor kidney transplant recipients. Pretransplant anti-A2 IgG titers were 2 in 16, 4 in 9, 8 in 6, and 16 in 5 and too weak to titer in 5 recipients. Eight patients had pretransplant donor-specific antibodies. During a median follow-up of 32.6 mo (6-57.3) patient and graft survival were 100% and 92% in the A2-incompatible kidney transplant group, and 91% and 92% in the blood group compatible group, respectively. Twelve A2-incompatible recipients underwent a 21 clinically indicated kidney biopsies at a median 28 d (6-390) after transplantation. None of the patients developed acute antibody-mediated rejection and 2 patients (5%) had acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Interestingly, peritubular capillary C4d positivity was seen in 7 biopsies which did not have any findings of acute rejection or microvascular inflammation but not in any of the rejection-free biopsies in the control group. C4d positivity was persistent in 5 of those patients who had follow-up biopsies., Conclusions: A2-incompatible transplantation is safe in patients with anti-A2 titers ≤16 with excellent short-term kidney allograft outcomes. C4d positivity is frequent in allograft biopsies without acute rejection., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

We investigated the prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of kidney transplants in the Bronx, New York, one of the epicenters of the pandemic. Between March 16 and June 2, 2020, 132 kidney transplant recipients tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. From May 3 to July 29, 2020, 912 kidney transplant recipients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies during routine clinic visits, of which 16.6% tested positive. Fifty-five of the 152 patients had previously tested positive by RT-PCR, while the remaining 97 did not have significant symptoms and had not been previously tested by RT-PCR. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 23.4% in the 975 patients tested by either RT-PCR or SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Older patients and patients with higher serum creatinine levels were more likely diagnosed by RT-PCR compared to SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Sixty-nine RT-PCR positive patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies at a median of 44 days post-diagnosis (Inter Quartile Range 31-58) and 80% were positive. Overall mortality was 20.5% but significantly higher (37.8%) in the patients who required hospitalization. Twenty-three percent of the hospitalized patients required kidney replacement therapy and 6.3% lost their allografts. In multivariable analysis, older age, receipt of deceased-donor transplantation, lack of influenza vaccination in the previous year and higher serum interleukine-6 levels were associated with mortality. Thus, 42% of patients with a kidney transplant and with COVID-19 were diagnosed on antibody testing without significant clinical symptoms; 80% of patients with positive RT-PCR developed SARS-CoV-2 IgG and mortality was high among patients requiring hospitalization., (Copyright © 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transplant recipients are susceptible to cardiovascular complications, obesity, and increased insulin resistance after transplant. Here we assess weight gain in diabetic recipients after pancreas transplantation., Methods: This is a single-center study of 32 simultaneous pancreas and kidney and 5 pancreas after kidney transplant recipients from 2014 to 2018. Starting C-peptide levels ≤ 0.1 ng/mL were used to denote insulin nondetectability (n = 25) and C-peptide levels > 0.1 ng/mL as insulin detectability (n = 12). Hemoglobin A 1c , body mass index (BMI), and weight following transplantation were assessed., Results: Hemoglobin A 1c at 1 year was 5.9% in the insulin nondetectable recipients and 5.6% in the insulin detectable group ( P = .56). Average BMI after transplant was higher in the insulin detectable group 28.6 versus 24.4 kg/m 2 ( P = .03) despite no difference in starting BMIs (24.9 versus 24.0 kg/m 2 , P = .42). The insulin detectable group also had a larger percentage weight change from their starting weight 13.1% versus 0.9 % at 1 year ( P = .02). Linear regression demonstrated that starting C-peptide was a significant predictor of weight gain posttransplant., Conclusions: Patients with elevated C-peptides at time of transplant are susceptible to rapid weight gain postoperatively. These patients may benefit from aggressive nutritional management.

The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has provided the impetus to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C virus-positive donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). Thirty D+/R- patients received DAA treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was defined as an undetectable viral load in 12 weeks after treatment. An age-matched cohort of uninfected donor and recipient pairs (D-/R-) transplanted during same time period was used for comparison. The median day of viral detection was postoperative day (POD) 2. The detection of viremia in D+/R- patients was 100%. The initial median viral load was 531 copies/μL (range: 10-1 × 10 8 copies/μL) with a median peak viral load of 3.4 × 10 5 copies/μL (range: 804-1.0 × 10 8 copies/μL). DAAs were initiated on median POD 9 (range: 5-41 days). All 30 patients had confirmed SVR12. During a median follow-up of 10 months, patient and graft survival was 100%, and acute rejection was 6.6% with no major adverse events related to DAA treatment. Delayed graft function was significantly decreased in D+/R- patients as compared to the age-matched cohort (27% vs 60%; P = .01). D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Extended release LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) allows once-daily dosing in transplant recipients. The improved bioavailability may be beneficial for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients (SPK)., Methods: This is a study of 39 SPK recipients on standard immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC, n = 21) or LCPT (n = 18). Coefficient of variability (CV = 100∗standard deviation/mean) was calculated to assess drug levels. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), tacrolimus and creatinine levels were measured postoperatively., Results: There was no difference in tacrolimus CV in the IR-TAC and LCPT groups at 1 month or 3 months postoperatively; however, a greater difference was observed at 1 year (41.0 vs. 33.1%; p = 0.19). There were six episodes of acute rejection in the IR-TAC group compared to zero episodes in the LCPT group (p = 0.01). HbA1c was significantly higher in the IR-TAC group compared to LCPT at 3 (5.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01), 6 (5.6 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01) and 12 months (5.8 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.07)., Conclusions: Significantly lower rates of rejection were observed in patients receiving LCPT. The once daily dosing may facilitate medication adherence and result in improved long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study assessed our experience transplanting kidneys from young donors with severe acute kidney injury., Methods: We performed a single center retrospective analysis of 315 kidney transplants between 1/1/2014-12/31/2016. Donor kidneys were classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. A case-matched cohort was created using recipient age, history of diabetes, donor specific antibody, donor age and donor after cardiac death. Primary endpoints were graft function measured by eGFR at 90 days and at 1-year., Results: Stage 3 AKIN recipients had significantly greater eGFR at one year (63.9 ml/min v. 51.2 ml/min, p < 0.001) compared to those with Stage 0 AKIN. This difference was abrogated when compared to a case matched cohort (eGFR at 90 days or 1 year; p > 0.05). Donor and recipient characteristics on eGFR at 1 year were analyzed using linear and logistic regression. Only donor age had a significant impact on recipient eGFR., Conclusions: Donor kidneys with severe acute injury can achieve optimal 1-year outcomes. Donor age is the most significant predictor of eGFR >45 ml/min after transplant., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We investigated clinical outcomes and molecular signatures of transplant glomerulopathy (TG) stratified by microvascular inflammation (MVI) and donor-specific antibody (DSA) status., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 749 kidney transplant patients who received a for-cause kidney biopsy from 2009 to 2014. We classified TG as MVI positive (MVI+) or MVI negative (MVI-), and with or without DSA. We obtained gene expression profiles for 44 biopsies by Affymetrix HuGene 1.0 ST expression arrays., Results: A total of 100 patients had TG; 49 were MVI+, and 51 were MVI-. After a median post-biopsy follow-up of 2.08 years (range 0.43-4.59), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated worse allograft survival in MVI+ TG patients compared with MVI- TG patients (P = 0.01), and time to graft failure was significantly shorter in MVI+ patients (1.08 ± 1.01 years vs 2.3 ± 1.8 years; P = 0.002). DSA status did not affect graft survival within MVI+ or MVI- groups. Analysis of pathogenesis-based transcripts (PBT) showed that MVI+ TG biopsies had increased expression of gamma interferon and rejection (GRIT) and DSA-associated transcripts (DSAST), as observed in antibody-mediated rejection. MVI- TG biopsies had increased expression of cytotoxic and regulatory T cell- and B cell-associated transcripts but not GRIT or DSAST. DSA status had no effect on expression of any PBTs studied in MVI- TG biopsies., Conclusions: Graft survival in TG is significantly worse in the presence of MVI. Gene expression profiles of MVI+ TG resemble antibody-mediated rejection while gene expression profiles of MVI- TG resemble cell-mediated rejection regardless of DSA status., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The benefits of kidney transplantation in diabetic patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) are unclear. While patients may have improved survival compared to dialysis, the burden of care after transplant has not been assessed., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adult diabetic kidney-only transplant recipients with and without PVD transplanted from January 2012 until June 30, 2015., Results: Of 203 diabetic kidney transplant recipients, 56 (27.6%) had PVD and 147 (72.4%) had no PVD. At a median of 3.14 years follow-up, there were no significant differences in 30-, 90-, or 1-year readmission rates. At 1 year after transplant, PVD patients were significantly more likely to have a greater sum of unplanned inpatient days (44.6% vs 27.9% with ≥10 inpatient days, P = .03) and at least 1 reoperation (28.6% vs. 8.7%, P < .01). At 1 year post-transplant, there were similar rates of graft-related reoperations; however, patients with PVD had significantly increased rates of non-graft-related operations of which 31.2% were PVD-related., Conclusions: Diabetic patients with PVD utilize more resources after kidney transplant, spending more time in the hospital and undergoing more post-transplant operations. The causes of readmission are predominantly related to progression of PVD rather than allograft complications., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We analyze our outcomes utilizing imported allografts as a strategy to shorten wait list time for pancreas transplantation., Methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort of 26 recipients who received either a locally procured (n = 16) or an imported pancreas graft (n = 10) at our center between January 2014 and May 2017. Wait list times of this cohort were compared to UNOS Region 9 (New York State and Western Vermont). Hospital financial data were also reviewed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this strategy., Results: Imported pancreas grafts had significantly increased cold ischemia times (CIT) and peak lipase (PL) levels compared to locally procured grafts (CIT 827 vs 497 minutes; P = .001, PL 563 vs 157 u/L; P = .023, respectively). There were no differences in graft or patient survival. The median wait time was significantly lower for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants at our center (518 days, n = 21) compared to Region 9 (1001 days, n = 65) P = .038. Despite financial concerns, the cost of transport for imported grafts was offset by lower standard acquisition costs., Conclusions: Imported pancreas grafts may be a cost-effective strategy to increase organ utilization and shorten wait times in regions with longer waiting times., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: With the development of all oral, interferon-free directly acting antiviral (DAA) medications, treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients is possible, but limited data exists on its safety and efficacy., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients transplanted at our center with HCV who have been started on DAAs. Primary endpoints included sustained virologic response as defined as negative viral load at 12 weeks postcompletion of therapy and allograft function., Results: A total of 31 patients met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used regimen was sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (n = 21). Of the treated patients, 100% had undetectable viral load at the completion of therapy. Of the 31 patients treated, 30 (97%) achieved sustained virologic response. Both graft and patient survivals at most recent follow-up was 100%. There was no significant change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before or after therapy (64.2 ± 16.5 mL/min per body surface area before vs. 58.9 ± 17.5 mL/min per body surface area after therapy; P = 0.22); however, 3 patients now have GFR less than 20. A total of 6 (19.3%) of 31 patients had worsening proteinuria during or shortly after therapy. Patients with more than 500 mg/g of proteinuria at the start of treatment were significantly more likely to develop worsening proteinuria than those with less than 500 mg/g of proteinuria at the start of therapy (P < 0.001). Retrospective review of 20 untreated HCV patients did not demonstrate worsening allograft function and proteinuria during a median follow-up time of 1386 days (range, 332-6254)., Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrate that DAAs can be used safely and effectively in patients after kidney transplantation. Patients with proteinuria or lower GFR should be monitored more closely.

We aimed to investigate the impact of the new kidney allocation system (KAS) on the rate of transplantation of sensitized patients at our center. Pre-KAS and post-KAS intervals were Jan 1st to Dec 3rd 2014 and Jan 1st 2015 to Dec 3rd 2015, respectively. The number of deceased-donor crossmatches performed by flow cytometry increased from 715 pre-KAS to 1188 post-KAS. The percent of crossmatches performed for sensitized patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA)>0% increased from 19% pre-KAS to 26% post-KAS (p<0.0001). The number of deceased-donor kidney transplants performed at our center increased from 115 pre-KAS to 125 post-KAS (9% increase). There was a significant increase in the percentage of deceased-donor kidney transplants received by sensitized candidates (from 14% to 26% pre- and post-KAS, respectively; p<0.0001). The highest increase was seen in the patients with cPRA>98%, from 0% to 9%, followed by the group with cPRA 50-79%, from 5% to 8%. This increase was balanced by a decrease of 12% in the percentage of non-sensitized recipients, and a modest decrease of 1% in the group with cPRA 1-49%. In conclusion, transplant rate has increased in sensitized patients after KAS. The highest increase was observed among highly sensitized patients (cPRA>98%)., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of sensitized pregnant kidney transplant recipients., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of female patients who received kidney transplant at Montefiore transplant center between June 1, 2009 through December 31, 2014 and had a documented pregnancy in our system., Results: We found that 11 women had pregnancies during this period with a median age of 36 yr (range 22, 39). Pregnancies occurred at a median of 3.1 yr (1.1, 8.7) after transplantation. Pre-pregnancy patients' median serum creatinine levels and spot urine protein/creatinine ratio were 1.1 mg/dL (1.1, 2.1) and 0.55 g/d (0, 1.2), respectively. Eight patients were sensitized with panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels > 0% and three had PRA of 0%. The sensitized group had a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes; one stillbirth and two second trimester miscarriage. During a median follow-up of 2.3 yr (1.2, 4) after delivery, three high PRA patients (37%) developed antibody-mediated rejection that led to graft loss., Conclusions: We observed an increased risk of rejection, graft loss, and adverse pregnancy outcomes in sensitized kidney recipients., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of complement-binding donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected up to 30 years after kidney transplantation. Group 1 patients included 284 consecutive DSA negative patients who underwent kidney transplantation after 1 May 2009. Group 2 included 405 patients transplanted before this date and followed at our center with functioning allografts. DSA were tested using Luminex Single Antigen and the C1q assay. In Group 1 patients, who were monitored prospectively, 31 (11%) developed de novo DSA during a median follow-up of 2.5 (1.9, 3.6) years. Of these, 11 (4%) had C1q+ and 20 (7%) had C1q negative DSA. In Group 2 patients, 77 (19%) displayed DSA. Among these, 33 (8%) had C1q+ and 44 (11%) had C1q negative DSA. The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was significantly higher in C1q+DSA patients in both Group 1 (45%) and Group 2 (15%) compared with C1q negative DSA (5% and 2%) and DSA negative patients (1% and 3%; P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The incidence of chronic AMR was 36% (Group 1) and 51% (Group 2) in patients with C1q+DSA. In contrast, chronic AMR occurred in 5% and 25% of C1q negative DSA, and 2% and 6% of DSA negative Group 1 and 2 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Although the graft survival was lower in Group 1 C1q+DSA patients (73%) compared with C1q negative DSA (95%) and DSA negative (94%) patients, the difference was not statistically significant by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = 0.21). Our results indicated that the presence of C1q+ DSA was associated with acute and chronic AMR., (Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are continuously evolving. Here we investigated the clinical and molecular significance of different Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) scores in transplant kidney biopsies. A total of 356 patients with clinically indicated kidney transplant biopsies were classified into three groups based on MVI scores of 0, 1, 2, or more for Groups 1-3, respectively. Gene expression profiles were assessed using arrays on a representative subset of 93 patients. The incidence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was increased from 25% in Group 1 to 36% in Group 2 and to 54% in Group 3. Acute and chronic AMR were significantly more frequent in Group 3 (15% and 35%) compared with the Group 2 (3% and 15%) and Group 1 (0% and 5%), respectively. Gene expression profiles showed increased interferon-γ and rejection-induced, cytotoxic and regulatory T-cell, natural killer cell-associated and donor-specific antibody (DSA)-selective transcripts in Group 3 compared with Groups 1 and 2. There was no significant difference in gene expression profiles between the Groups 1 and 2. Increased intragraft expression of DSA-selective transcripts was found in the biopsies of C4d- Group 3 patients. Thus, an MVI score of 2 or more was significantly associated with a histological diagnosis of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Hence, increased intragraft DSA-selective gene transcripts may be used as molecular markers for AMR, especially in C4d- biopsies., (Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe systemic hypertension (HTN) is a risk factor for perioperative cardiovascular complications; however, its impact at the time of kidney transplantation (KTX) is not well defined., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult kidney-only transplant recipients between October 2009 and December 2012 was performed to examine outcomes between patients with (n = 111) and without (n = 98) severe preoperative HTN defined as SBP > 180 or DBP > 110 mmHg., Results: Recipients with severe HTN were older (56.7 ± 13.0 vs. 53.5 ± 12.4 yr, p = 0.07) and significantly more likely to receive an expanded criteria donor kidney (32.7% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.02). No patients developed hypertensive crisis, intracranial hemorrhage, or life threatening ventricular arrhythmias within 30 d post-transplantation; however, three patients with severe HTN had cardiac events: two with demand ischemia and one with decompensate heart failure. Two patients in the control group had decompensated heart failure. There were no differences between the groups in terms of cardiac event (2.7% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.75), one-yr patient survival (98.2% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.90) or graft survival (90.1% vs. 92.9%, p = 0.48), nadir creatinine > 2 mg/dL (4.6% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.62), length of stay > 6 d (37.8% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.75), and DGF (52.3% vs. 63.3%, p = 0.11)., Conclusions: Our results suggest that severe preoperative HTN should not be considered an absolute contraindication to kidney transplant in patients who are otherwise clinically stable., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We aimed to investigate the clinical, histopathological, and molecular factors associated with allograft loss in transplant glomerulopathy (TGP) patients., Methods: Of the 525 patients who underwent clinically indicated kidney biopsies, 52 (10%) had diagnosis of TGP. Gene expression profiles of 28 TGP and 11 normal transplant kidney biopsy samples were analyzed by Affymetrix HuGene 1.0 ST expression arrays., Results: Over a median follow up of 23 months (1-46 months) after the diagnosis of TGP by biopsy, 17 patients (32%) lost their allografts at a median of 16 months (1-44 months). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of any demographic variables, serum creatinine, panel reactive antibody levels, donor-specific antibody frequency, or mean fluorescence intensity values. Patients who lost their allograft had a significantly higher median spot protein to creatinine ratio 2.81 (1.20-6.00) compared to no graft loss patients 1.16 (0.15-2.53), (P < 0.01), and a trends toward a higher mean chronic glomerulopathy (cg) score (1.65 ± 0.93 vs 1.11 ± 0.93) (P = 0.05). There was also no difference in microvascular inflammation or any other Banff injury scores between the 2 groups. Although 117 gene transcripts were upregulated in both groups, 86 and 57 were upregulated in graft loss and functioning allograft groups, respectively. There were significantly increased levels of intragraft endothelial cell-associated transcripts, gene transcripts associated with complement cascade, interleukins and their receptors and granulysin in graft loss patients compared to patients with a functioning allograft., Conclusion: Our results demonstrate differential intragraft gene expression profiles in TGP patients with allograft loss.

Background: It is estimated that approximately 50% of males over 50 have benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). BPH is underappreciated in anuric patients with end stage renal disease, and failure of diagnosis in this population can lead to complications after kidney transplantation., Methods: A single-center retrospective review of male patients over 50 yr of age transplanted from January 1, 2010, until September 30, 2013, was performed. Outcomes assessed were as follows: graft survival, urinary retention, discharge with Foley catheter, and urinary tract infection (UTI)., Results: Of 147 patients, 17.0% were diagnosed with BPH before transplant, 19.0% received a BPH diagnosis after transplant, and 64% did not have BPH. Compared to those without BPH, a post-transplant BPH diagnosis was associated with urinary retention during the transplant admission (0% vs. 46.4%, p < 0.01), discharge with Foley catheter (0% vs. 21.4%, p < 0.01), readmission related to urinary retention (0% vs. 46.4%, p < 0.01), and UTI (18.0% vs. 64.3%, p < 0.01). Patients with prior diagnosis of BPH and on therapy had similar outcomes to those without BPH., Conclusions: Following kidney transplant, urinary tract complications are more common in patients with BPH; however, being on medical therapy prior to transplantation diminishes the incidence of these complications significantly., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Patients with pretransplantation strong donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) are at higher risk for rejection. We aimed to study the safety of kidney transplantation in patients with lower strength DSAs in a prospective cohort study., Methods: Three hundred and seventy-three consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients with (DSA+; n=66) and without (DSA-; n=307) DSA were evaluated. Anti-HLA antibodies with mean fluorescence intensity values over 5,000 for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR and more than 10,000 for HLA-DQ were reported as unacceptable antigens. Patients received transplant if flow cytometry T-cell and B-cell cross-match channel shift values were less than 150 and 250, respectively, with antithymocyte globulin and intravenous immunoglobulin induction treatment., Results: Patients had a mean number of 1.6 ± 0.8 DSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity value of 2,815 ± 2,550. Twenty-seven percent were flow cytometry cross-match positive with T-cell and B-cell channel shift values of 129 ± 49 and 159 ± 52, respectively. During a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 6-50), there were no statistically significant differences in patient (99% vs. 95%) and graft survival (88% vs. 90%) rates between DSA+ and DSA- groups, respectively. Cumulative acute rejection rates of 11% in the DSA+ group and 12% in the DSA- group were similar. Two DSA+ (3%) and five DSA- (2%) patients developed chronic antibody-mediated rejection (3%). The mean serum creatinine levels were identical between the two groups (1.4 ± 0.6 mg/dL)., Conclusion: Similar patient and graft survival, and acute rejection rates can be achieved in DSA+ patients compared to DSA- patients with pretransplantation immunologic risk assessment.

We investigated why some donor-specific antibody-positive patients do not develop antibody-mediated rejection. Of 71 donor-specific antibody-positive patients, 46 had diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and 25 had normal biopsies. Fifty donor-specific antibody-negative patients with normal biopsies were used as a control group. A subgroup of 61 patients with available biopsy and 64 with blood samples were analyzed by microarrays. Both donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-positive and negative biopsies showed increased expression of gene transcripts associated with cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, macrophages, interferon-gamma, and rejection compared to donor-specific antibody-negative biopsies. Regulatory T-cell transcripts were upregulated in donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-positive and B-cell transcripts in donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-negative biopsies. Whole-blood gene expression analysis showed increased immune activity in only donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-positive but not negative patients. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 4 donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-negative patients developed antibody-mediated rejection, 12 continued to have donor-specific antibody, but 9 lost their donor-specific antibody. Gene expression profiles did not predict the development of antibody-mediated rejection or the persistence of donor-specific antibody. Thus, donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-negative patients had increased rejection-associated gene transcripts in their allografts despite no histologic findings of rejection but not in their blood. This was found in both biopsy and blood samples of donor-specific antibody-positive/antibody-mediated rejection-positive patients.

Background: This study aimed to investigate global gene expression profiles of BK viremia and nephropathy (BKVN) samples using microarrays to investigate the immunologic response to BK virus., Methods: Patients were monitored for BK viremia in the blood monthly for 6 months, then at 9 and 12 months after kidney transplantation. BKVN and normal transplant kidney biopsy samples, and whole blood samples of patients with and without BK viremia were analyzed by Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays., Results: During a mean follow-up of 917±325 days, 61 of the 289 patients (21%) developed BK viremia at a median 149 (27, 1,113) days after transplantation with a median peak PCR titers of 35,900 (1,000, 2,677,000). The only significant risk factor for development of BK viremia was induction with anti-thymocyte globulin (P=0.03). Only four patients developed BKVN (1.3%). Pathogenesis-based transcript analysis revealed a significant increased expression of interferon-gamma and rejection induced (GRIT), quantitative cytotoxic T-cell (QCAT), quantitative constitutive and alternate macrophage, B-cell and natural killer cell-associated transcripts (NKAT), indicating an active inflammatory immune response in BKVN biopsies (n=3) compared to normal transplant kidney biopsies with (n=3) and without BK viremia (n=11). The whole blood gene expression profiles of 19 BK viremia patients revealed significant increased expression of GRIT, QCAT, and NKAT compared to 14 patients without viremia., Conclusions: The results showed increased activity of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells in BKVN and viremia samples resembling acute rejection and suggested the involvement of both adaptive and innate immunity.

Background: This study investigated the mechanisms involved in development of donor-specific antibody (DSA) and/or C4d-negative transplant glomerulopathy (TGP) by allograft gene expression profiles using microarrays., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: This cohort study was conducted in kidney transplant recipients. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they required a clinically indicated biopsy at any time point after their transplant. They were then classified according to their histopathology findings and DSA and C4d results. Eighteen chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), 14 DSA+/C4d- TGP, 25 DSA-/C4d- TGP, and 47 nonspecific interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) biopsy specimens were identified. In a subset of patients from the study population, biopsy specimens in each group and normal transplant kidney specimens were analyzed with Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays., Results: The mean sum score of glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis increased from 0.28±0.78 in IFTA specimens to 0.75±0.85 in DSA-/C4d- TGP specimens, 1.71±1.49 in DSA+/C4d-/TGP specimens, and 2.11±1.74 in CAMR specimens (P<0.001). During a median follow-up time of 2 (interquartile range, 1.4-2.8) years after biopsy, graft loss was highest in CAMR specimens (27.8%) compared to IFTA specimens (8.5%), DSA+/C4d- TGP specimens (14.3%), and DSA-/C4d- TGP specimens (16%) (P=0.01). With use of microarrays, comparison of the gene expression profiles of DSA-/C4d- TGP specimens with glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis scores > 0 to normal and IFTA biopsy specimens revealed higher expression of quantitative cytotoxic T cell-associated transcripts (QCAT). However, both CAMR and DSA+/C4d- TGP specimens had higher expression of not only QCAT but also IFN-γ and rejection-induced, constitutive macrophage-associated, natural killer cell-associated, and DSA-selective transcripts. Endothelial cell-associated transcript expression was upregulated only in CAMR biopsy specimens., Conclusions: These results suggested that DSA+/C4d- TGP biopsy specimens may be classified as CAMR. In contrast, DSA-/C4d- TGP specimens showed increased cytotoxic T cell-associated transcripts, suggesting T cell activation as a mechanism of injury.

Alemtuzumab (AZ) induction in hepatitis C-seropositive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KTX) recipients may negatively affect patient survival; however, available information is scant. Using US registry data from 2003 to 2010 of adult HCV+ deceased-donor KTXs (n = 4910), we examined outcomes by induction agent - AZ (n = 294), other T cell-depleting agents, (n = 2033; T cell), IL-2 receptor blockade (n = 1135; IL-2RAb), and no induction (n = 1448). On multivariate analysis, induction therapy was associated with significantly better overall patient survival with AZ [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45, 0.92], T cell (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41, 0.65) or IL-2RAb (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53, 0.87), compared to no induction. A significant protective effect was also seen with AZ (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40, 0.99), T cell (aHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78), and IL2R-Ab (aHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47, 0.82) in terms of death-censored graft survival relative to no induction. There were 88 HIV+/HCV+ coinfected recipients. Compared to noninduction, any induction (i.e. three induction groups combined) was associated with similar overall patient survival (P = 0.2255) on univariate analysis. Induction therapy with AZ, other T cell-depleting agents, or IL-2RAb in HCV+ KTX is associated with better patient and death-censored graft survival compared to noninduction. In HCV/HIV coinfected patients, induction is not contraindicated., (© 2013 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Currently, many transplantation centers do not follow former living kidney donors on a long-term basis. Several potential barriers have been identified to provide this follow-up of former living kidney donors, including concerns that donor insurance will not reimburse transplantation centers or primary care physicians for this care. Here, we report the rates at which different insurance companies reimbursed our transplantation center for follow-up visits of living donors., Methods: We collected data on all yearly follow-up visits of living donors billed from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010, representing 82 different donors. Concurrent visits of their recipients were available for 47 recipients and were used as a control group., Results: We find that most bills for follow-up visits of living kidney donors were paid by insurance companies, at a rate similar to the reimbursement for recipient follow-up care., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, for former donors with insurance, inadequate reimbursement should not be a barrier in providing follow-up care.