1. Blended foods for tube-fed children: a safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence
- Author
-
Clare Sadlier, Alexander Toft, Ailsa Kennedy, Susie Lapwood, David Widdas, Jane Coad, H. R. Jenkins, Julie Hammonds, Mark Hunter, Joseph C Manning, and Simon Murch
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Home Nursing ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Gastrostomy feeding ,Muscular Disorders ,Choice Behavior ,Child health ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Enteral Nutrition ,Risk Factors ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,Child ,Complex care needs ,Family Health ,Food, Formulated ,Gastrostomy ,030109 nutrition & dietetics ,business.industry ,Childhood nutrition ,Dysphagia ,Clinical research ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain.
- Published
- 2016