1. Application value of dual-source virtual non-contrast CT combined with AI in diagnosis of acute intracranial hemorrhage
- Author
-
BAI Shanwei, WEI Xin, ZHOU Zhiming, AI Guangyong, ZHANG Rong, and CHEN Jinhua
- Subjects
tomography ,x-ray computed ,virtual non-contrast ,intracranial hemorrhage ,artificial intelligence ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical value of dual-source virtual non-contrast (VNC) CT combined with artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis of acute intracranial hemorrhage. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on the imaging data of non-contrast CT and dual-energy CT angiography (CTA) in 67 patients with suspected intracranial hemorrhage. They were 32 males and 35 females, at an average age of 56.2±12.5 (35~89) years. The differences of average CT value, noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR), contrast noise ratio (CNR) and radiation dose between VNCT and NCCT were analyzed. Taken the common diagnosis results of two radiologists as the reference standard, the type of intracranial hemorrhage, the degree of midline structural deviation, the long and short diameters of the largest hemorrhage layer and the volume of hematoma were analyzed by AI software under VNCT and NCCT images. And the time taken by radiologists and AI to obtain the above quantitative evaluation indexes was compared. Results In the objective evaluation, the average CT value, SNR and CNR were significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the noise was higher in the VNCT images than the NCCT images (P < 0.001). The radiation dose of VNCT was lower by 75.6% than that of NCCT+CTA (P < 0.001). The qualitative analysis indicated that the accuracy of AI in diagnosing intracranial hemorrhage on NCCT and VNCT images was 94.0% and 89.6% respectively. The accuracy rates of VNCT+AI for IPH, IVH, SAH and SDH were 83.6%, 86.0%, 83.0% and 60.0%, respectively, which had no differences when compared with those of NCCT+AI (all P>0.05). In the quantitative analysis, VNCT+AI had good consistency with manual measurement results in terms of the above indicators (ICC=0.820, 0.942, 0.920, and 0.959, P < 0.001). In terms of the time required for AI diagnosis, VNCT need significantly shorter time than NCCT(50.6±15.9 vs 58.5±24.9 s, P < 0.001). Conclusion Dual-source VNC technology has low radiation dose, simple and fast examination process, and high accuracy in the diagnosis of acute intracranial hemorrhage when combined with AI. And the quantitative evaluation indexes of VNCT+AI are in good consistency with radiologists and has potential clinical application value.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF