1. Utilization and responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) at the initiation of therapy for patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Hani Tamim, Mohammed Al Ghobain, Mohamed S Al Moamary, and Ahmed G Al-Kordi
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Saudi Arabia ,Peak Expiratory Flow Rate ,Primary care ,Motor Activity ,Guidelines ,Severity of Illness Index ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Asthma control ,Forced Expiratory Volume ,Severity of illness ,Control ,medicine ,Humans ,Asthma control test ,Asthma ,lcsh:RC705-779 ,business.industry ,lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Bronchodilator Agents ,Dyspnea ,Global initiative for asthma ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Persistent asthma ,business ,Asthma Control Test ,After treatment ,Research Article ,Saudi initiative for asthma - Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) to detect changes at the initiation of therapy and its utilization in the initiation of asthma treatment. Methods This study was designed as a randomized clinical trial conducted in a primary care setting. The subjects were asthma patients who had not received controller therapy for at least two months. The patients were randomized into two groups: The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) group. Treatment in the SINA group was initiated at step1 when the ACT scores ≥ 20, step 2 when the score between16-19, and step 3 when the score < 16 began at step 3. The GINA group patients were started on step 2 when they had persistent asthma symptoms or step 3 when they had severely uncontrolled disease. Results Forty-five patients were analyzed in each group. The improvement in ACT score after treatment initiation was significantly higher when the SINA approach was used (2.9 in the SINA group compared to 1.7 in the GINA group (p = 0.04)). The improvement in FEV1 was 5.8% in the SINA group compared to 3.4% in the GINA group (p = 0.46). The number of patients who achieved asthma control at the follow-up visit and required no treatment adjustment was 33 (73.3%) in the SINA group and 27 (60%) in the GINA group (p = 0.0125). Conclusion The ACT was responsive to change at the initiation of asthma treatment and was useful for the initiation of asthma treatment. Trial Registration number ISRCTN31998214
- Published
- 2012