Search

BackgroundDuring peripheral extracorporeal veno-arterial membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support, subclavian arterial cannulation provides, in comparison to femoral arterial cannulation, an anterograde flow which may prevent from left ventricular (LV) distention and improve outcomes. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of subclavian cannulation to femoral cannulation in reducing LV overdistension consequences, hemostatic complications and mortality.MethodsThis retrospective study conducted in two intensive care units of the Lille academic hospitals from January 2013 to December 2019 included 372 non-moribund adult patients supported by VA-ECMO. The primary endpoint was a new onset of pulmonary edema (PO) or LV unloading. Secondary endpoints were myocardial recovery, serious bleeding (according to Extracorporeal Life Support Organization definition), thrombotic complications (a composite of stroke, cannulated limb or mesenteric ischemia, intracardiac or aortic-root thrombosis) and 28 day mortality. Differences in outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment (IPTW).ResultsAs compared to femoral cannulation (n = 320 patients), subclavian cannulation (n = 52 patients) did not reduce the occurrence of new onset of PO or LV unloading after PSM [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.51–1.91)]. There was no other difference in outcomes in PSM cohort. In IPTW adjustment cohort, subclavian cannulation was associated with reduced recovery and increased serious bleeding with four accidental decannulations observed.ConclusionSubclavian artery cannulation was not associated with reduced LV distension related complications, thrombotic complications and 28 day mortality. Rather, it may increase serious bleeding and accidental decannulations, and reduce recovery. Therefore, subclavian cannulation should be limited to vascular accessibility issues.