Search

Aims: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion over systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) assessed by echocardiography appears to be a good non-invasive approach for right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling assessment. We aimed to assess the in-hospital prognostic value of TAPSE/sPAP among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF)., Methods and Results: In total, 333 consecutive patients (mean age 68 ± 14 years, 70% of male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 44 ± 16%) were hospitalized for AHF across 39 French cardiology departments, with TAPSE/sPAP measured by echocardiography within the first 24 h of hospitalization were included in this prospective study. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock and occurred in 50 (15%) patients. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the best TAPSE/sPAP threshold for in-hospital MACEs was 0.40 mm/mmHg. TAPSE/sPAP < 0.40 mm/mmHg was independently associated with in-hospital MACEs, even after adjustment with comorbidities [odds ratio (OR): 3.75, 95% CI (1.87-7.93), P < 0.001], clinical severity [OR: 2.80, 95% CI (1.36-5.95), P = 0.006]. Using a 1:1 propensity-matched population, TAPSE/sPAP ratio < 0.40 was associated with a higher rate of in-hospital MACEs [OR: 2.98, 95% CI (1.53-6.12), P = 0.002]. After adjustment, TAPSE/sPAP < 0.40 showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional prognostic factors (C-statistic improvement: 0.05; χ2 improvement: 14.4; likelihood-ratio test P < 0.001). These results were consistent in an external validation cohort of 133 patients., Conclusion: TAPSE/sPAP < 0.40 mm/mmHg assessed by an early echocardiography during an AHF episode is independently associated with in-hospital MACEs suggesting enhanced close monitoring and strengthened heart failure-specific care in these patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05063097., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: The clinical significance and feasibility of the recently described non-invasive parameters exploring ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess VAC parameters for prognostic stratification in stable patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% following myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods and Results: Between 2018 and 2021, patients with LVEF ≥40% were evaluated 1 month following MI using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and arterial tonometry at rest and after a handgrip test. VAC was studied via the ratio between arterial elastance (Ea) and end-systolic LV elastance (Ees) and between pulse wave velocity (PWV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): all-cause death, acute heart failure, stroke, AMI, and urgent cardiovascular hospitalization. Among the 374 patients included, Ea/Ees and PWV/GLS were obtained at rest for 354 (95%) and 253 patients (68%), respectively. Isometric exercise was workable in 335 patients (85%). During a median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range: 16-42), 41 (11%) MACE occurred. Patients presenting MACE were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease, lower GLS, higher Ea, PWV, and PWV/GLS ratio. The Ea/Ees ratio and standard TTE parameters during isometric exercise were not associated with MACE. After adjustment, the PWV/GLS ratio was the only VAC parameter independently associated with outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a PWV/GLS ratio >0.70 (Youden's index = 0.37) as the best threshold to identify patients developing MACE: hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 2.2 (1.14-4.27), P = 0.02., Conclusion: The PWV/GLS ratio, assessed 1 month after MI, identifies a group of patients at higher risk of MACE providing additional value on top of conventional non-invasive parameters., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and ejection fraction (LVEF) are the parameters to look for when discussing repair in asymptomatic patients with a primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). Loading conditions are altering LV-function quantification. LV-myocardial work (LVMW) is a method based on pressure-strain loops., Hypothesis: We sought to evaluate the additive value of the LVMW for predicting clinical events in patients with PMR., Methods: 103 patients (66% men, median age 57 years) with asymptomatic severe PMR were explored at rest and during an exercise stress echocardiography. LV myocardial global work index (GWI), constructive work (GCW), wasted work (GWW), and work efficiency (GWE) were measured with speckle-tracking echocardiography at rest and low workload. The indication for surgery was based on the heart teams' decision. The median follow-up was 670 days., Results: Clinical events occurred for 50 patients (48.5%) with a median of event-free survival distribution of 289 days. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) at rest was 32.61 ± 8.56 mmHg and did not predict the risk of event like LVEF and LVESD. Changes in, GLS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.36-0.83; p = .005), GWI (HR 1.01; 95% Cl: 1.00-1.02; p = .002) and GCW (HR 1.85; 95% Cl: 1.28-2.68; p = .001) in addition to Left Atrial Volume Index (HR 1.73; 95% CI: 1.28 - 2.33; p < 0,001) were independent predictors of events., Conclusion: Changes in myocardial work indices related to low-dose exercise are relevant to best predict PMR patient prognosis It might help to better select patient's candidate for "early-surgery.", (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Although staging of the extent of aortic stenosis (AS)-related cardiac damages is usually performed via echocardiography, this technique has considerable limitations in assessing pulmonary artery and right chamber pressures. The present hypothesis-generating study sought to explore the efficacy of a staging system of cardiac damage based on echocardiographic and invasive [right heart catheterization (RHC)] hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Methods: We studied 90 symptomatic patients with severe AS in whom echocardiographic and invasive evaluation by RHC was obtained prior to TAVI. Cardiac damage stages were defined as follows: no cardiac damage (stage 0), left ventricular (LV) damage (stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (stage 3), and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or low-flow state (stage 4). With the integrative approach using RHC, pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined as an mPAP ≥25 mmHg and the low-flow state corresponded to a cardiac index of <1.8 L/min/m 2 and a right atrial pressure of >10 mmHg., Results: During follow-up (median: 2.9 years), 43 patients (47.8%) died. The integrative cardiac damage staging was associated with a significant increase in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality per each increase of cardiac damage stage, whereas the outcome was similar according to the echocardiographic staging., Conclusions: A staging system of cardiac lesion based on echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic parameters in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI predicts mortality. Patients with pre-existing PH, ≥ moderate tricuspid regurgitation and/or RV dysfunction, and a low-flow state had a markedly increased risk of death. Further larger studies are needed to validate our findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Viva, Postolache, Nguyen Trung, Danthine, Petitjean, Bruno, Martinez, Lempereur, Guazzi, Aghezzaf, Coisne, Oury, Dulgheru and Lancellotti.)

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been associated with bleeding. However, there is a lack of prospective assessment of bleeding events and their clinical significance in a large population of outpatients with variable degree of AS severity., Objectives: To assess the incidence, source, determinants, and prognostic impact of major bleeding in patients with variable degree of AS severity., Methods: Between May 2016 and December 2017, consecutive outpatients were included. Major bleeding was defined as type ≥3 bleed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Cumulative incidence was calculated with death as the competing event. Data was censored at time of aortic valve replacement., Results: Among 2,830 patients, 46 major bleeding events occurred (0.7%/year) during a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range: 1.4-2.7). Most frequent sites of bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%) and intracranial (30.4%). Major bleeding was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 5.93 (95% confidence interval 3.64-9.65); P < .001). AS severity was associated with major bleedings (P = .041). By multivariable analysis, severe AS was an independent determinant of major bleeding (hazard ratio vs mild AS: 3.59 [95% confidence interval 1.56-8.29]; P = .003). The increased risk of bleeding associated with severe AS was significantly exacerbated in patients using oral anticoagulation., Conclusion: In AS patients, major bleeding is rare but a strong independent predictor of death. AS severity is a determinant of bleeding events. Severe AS and oral anticoagulation should be identified as an association at very high risk of major bleeding., Competing Interests: Disclosures None reported., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement for symptomatic or selected asymptomatic high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Conversely, a watchful waiting attitude applies to patients with moderate aortic stenosis, regardless of their risk profile and symptoms, until the echocardiographic thresholds of severe aortic stenosis are reached. This strategy is based on data reporting high mortality in untreated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, whereas moderate aortic stenosis has always been perceived as a non-threatening condition, with a benefit-risk balance against surgery. Meanwhile, numerous studies have reported a worrying event rate in these patients, surgical techniques and outcomes have improved significantly and the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become more widespread and extended to lower-risk patients, leaving this strategy open to question, especially for patients with moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about moderate aortic stenosis progression and prognosis. We also discuss the particular case of moderate aortic stenosis associated with left ventricular dysfunction, and the ongoing trials that that might change our paradigm for the management of this "moderate" valvular heart disease., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Various definitions of very severe (VS) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) have been proposed based on the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) or tricuspid coaptation gap (TCG). Because of the inherent limitations associated with the EROA, we hypothesized that the TCG would be more suitable for defining VSTR and predicting outcomes., Materials and Methods: In this French multicentre retrospective study, we included 606 patients with ≥moderate-to-severe isolated functional TR (without structural valve disease or an overt cardiac cause) according to the recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Patients were further stratified into VSTR according to the EROA (≥60 mm 2 ) and then according to the TCG (≥10 mm). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality., Results: The relationship between the EROA and TCG was poor ( R 2  =   0.22), especially when the size of the defect was large. Four-year survival was comparable between patients with an EROA <60 mm 2 vs. ≥60 mm 2 (68 ± 3% vs. 64 ± 5%, p  = 0.89). A TCG ≥10 mm was associated with lower four-year survival than a TCG <10 mm (53 ± 7% vs. 69 ± 3%, p  < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, including comorbidity, symptoms, dose of diuretics, and right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, a TCG ≥10 mm remained independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI] = 1.47[1.13-2.21], p  = 0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI] = 2.12[1.33-3.25], p  = 0.001), whereas an EROA ≥60 mm 2 was not associated with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR[95% CI]: 1.16[0.81-1.64], p  = 0.416, and adjusted HR[95% CI]: 1.07[0.68-1.68], p  = 0.784, respectively)., Conclusion: The correlation between the TCG and EROA is weak and decreases with increasing defect size. A TCG ≥10 mm is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and should be used to define VSTR in isolated significant functional TR., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Bohbot, Tordjman, Dreyfus, Le Tourneau, Lavie-Badie, Selton-Suty, Elegamandji, L'official, Fraix, Aghezzaf, Turgeon, Messika Zeitoun, Enriquez-Sarano, Coisne, Donal and Tribouilloy.)

Background: On-pump cardiac surgery triggers sterile inflammation and postoperative complications such as postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Hematopoietic somatic mosaicism (HSM) is a recently identified risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and results in a shift toward a chronic proinflammatory monocyte transcriptome and phenotype., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of HSM on preoperative blood and myocardial myeloid cells as well as on outcomes after cardiac surgery., Methods: Blood DNA from 104 patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) was genotyped using the HemePACT panel (576 genes). Four screening methods were applied to assess HSM, and postoperative outcomes were explored. In-depth blood and myocardial leukocyte phenotyping was performed in selected patients using mass cytometry and preoperative and postoperative RNA sequencing analysis of classical monocytes., Results: The prevalence of HSM in the patient cohort ranged from 29%, when considering the conventional HSM panel (97 genes) with variant allelic frequencies ≥2%, to 60% when considering the full HemePACT panel and variant allelic frequencies ≥1%. Three of 4 explored HSM definitions were significantly associated with higher risk for POAF. On the basis of the most inclusive definition, HSM carriers exhibited a 3.5-fold higher risk for POAF (age-adjusted OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.52-8.03; P = 0.003) and an exaggerated inflammatory response following AVR. HSM carriers presented higher levels of activated CD64 + CD14 + CD16 - circulating monocytes and inflammatory monocyte-derived macrophages in presurgery myocardium., Conclusions: HSM is frequent in candidates for AVR, is associated with an enrichment of proinflammatory cardiac monocyte-derived macrophages, and predisposes to a higher incidence of POAF. HSM assessment may be useful in the personalized management of patients in the perioperative period. (Post-Operative Myocardial Incident & Atrial Fibrillation [POMI-AF]; NCT03376165)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by grants from Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Fondation Leducq convention 16CVD01 (“Defining and Targeting Epigenetic Pathways in Monocytes and Macrophages That Contribute to Cardiovascular Disease”), the European Genomic Institute for Diabetes (ANR-10-LABX-0046), Fondation Pour la Recherche Médicale (REFERENCE PROJET EQU202203014650), and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (TOMIS leukocytes: ANR-CE14-0003-01). Dr Staels is a recipient of an Advanced European Research Council Grant (694717). Dr Vicario was supported by the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research–Bristol Myers Squibb Fellowship for Young Investigators in Translational Immuno-Oncology. Work at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) is supported by an MSKCC core grant (P30 CA008748), National Institutes of Health grants 1R01NS115715-01, 1 R01 HL138090-01, and 1 R01 AI130345-01, Basic and Translational Immunology Grants from the Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy to Dr Geissmann. Dr de Winther is funded by grants from the Netherlands Heart Foundation (CVON: GENIUS2) and the Netherlands Heart Foundation and Spark-Holding (2019B016). Dr Neele is a Dekker fellow of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (2020T029). Dr White is founder and owner of Resphera Biosciences. Dr Geissmann has performed consulting for Third Rock Ventures. Dr Fragkogianni is employed by Tempus Labs. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To compare the clinical significance of exercise echocardiography (ExE) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) in patients with ≥moderate primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and discrepancy between symptoms and MR severity., Methods and Results: Patients consulting for ≥moderate discordant primary MR prospectively underwent low (25 W) ExE, peak ExE, and CPX within 2 months in Lille and Rennes University Hospital. Patients with Class I recommendation for surgical MR correction were excluded. Changes in MR severity, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were evaluated during ExE. Patients were followed for major events (ME): cardiovascular death, acute heart failure, or mitral valve surgery. Among 128 patients included, 22 presented mild-to-moderate, 61 moderate-to-severe, and 45 severe MR. Unlike MR variation, SPAP and LVEF were successfully assessed during ExE in most patients. Forty-one patients (32%) displayed reduced aerobic capacity (peak VO2 &lt; 80% of predicted value) with cardiac limitation in 28 (68%) and muscular or respiratory limitation in the 13 others (32%). ME occurred in 61 patients (47.7%) during a mean follow-up of 27 ± 21 months. Twenty-five Watts SPAP [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) = 1.03 (1.01-1.06), P = 0.003] and reduced aerobic capacity [HR (95% CI) = 1.74 (1.03-2.95), P = 0.04] were independently predictive of ME, even after adjustment for MR severity. The cut-off of 55 mmHg for 25 W SPAP showed the best accuracy to predict ME (area under the curve = 0.60, P = 0.05)., Conclusion: In patients with ≥moderate primary MR and discordant symptoms, 25 W exercise pulmonary hypertension, defined as an SPAP ≥55 mmHg, and poor aerobic capacity during CPX are independently associated with adverse events., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: A number of epidemiological studies have suggested an association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the pathogenesis leading to AF in the context of MAFLD remains unclear. We therefore aimed at assessing the impact of MAFLD and liver fibrosis status on left atrium (LA) structure and function., Methods: Patients with a Fatty Liver Index (FLI) >60 and the presence of metabolic comorbidities were classified as MAFLD+. In MAFLD+ patients, liver fibrosis severity was defined using the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS), as follows: MAFLD w/o fibrosis (NFS ≦ -1.455), MAFLD w/indeterminate fibrosis (-1.455 < NFS < 0.675), and MAFLD w/fibrosis (NFS ≧ 0.675). In the first cohort of patients undergoing AF ablation, the structural and functional impact on LA of MAFLD was assessed by LA strain analysis and endocardial voltage mapping. Histopathological assessment of atrial fibrosis was performed in the second cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Finally, the impact of MAFLD on AF recurrence following catheter ablation was assessed., Results: In the AF ablation cohort (NoMAFLD n = 123; MAFLD w/o fibrosis n = 37; MAFLD indeterm. fibrosis n = 75; MAFLD w/severe fibrosis n = 10), MAFLD patients with high risk of F3-F4 liver fibrosis presented more LA low-voltage areas as compared to patients without MAFLD (16.5 [10.25; 28] vs 5.0 [1; 11] low-voltage areas p = 0.0115), impaired LA reservoir function assessed by peak left atrial longitudinal strain (19.7% ± 8% vs 8.9% ± 0.89% p = 0.0268), and increased LA volume (52.9 ± 11.7 vs 43.5 ± 18.0 ml/m 2 p = 0.0168). Accordingly, among the MAFLD patients, those with a high risk of F3-F4 liver fibrosis presented a higher rate of AF recurrence during follow-up (p = 0.0179). In the cardiac surgery cohort (NoMAFLD n = 12; MAFLD w/o fibrosis n = 5; MAFLD w/fibrosis n = 3), an increase in histopathological atrial fibrosis was observed in MAFLD patients with a high risk of F3-F4 liver fibrosis (p = 0.0206 vs NoMAFLD; p = 0.0595 vs MAFLD w/o fibrosis)., Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that liver fibrosis scoring in MAFLD patients is associated with adverse atrial remodeling and AF recurrences following catheter ablation. The impact of the management of MAFLD on LA remodeling and AF ablation outcomes should be assessed in dedicated studies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Decoin, Butruille, Defrancq, Robert, Destrait, Coisne, Aghezzaf, Woitrain, Gouda, Schino, Klein, Maboudou, Brigadeau, Klug, Vincentelli, Dombrowicz, Staels, Montaigne and Ninni.)

The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function reported a new algorithm to assess diastolic function and to estimate left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). At least five to six different parameters were necessary to conclude, each of them with their own inter-observer variability. This article examines the reproducibility of each parameter of the algorithm and its influence on the final decision of the clinician. Echocardiographic exams of 12 non-selected patients without any known cardiac disease or follow-up but addressed to the hospital for symptoms were analyzed by two readers (one junior and one senior) in five French cardiologic tertiary centers. Inter-observer reproducibility at each step of the algorithm and final decision were analyzed. There was mild agreement on the final decision. The main reasons of discrepancy were disagreement on the significance of mitral annular calcifications and measured values that are just around the cut-off (despite good reproducibility, a slight variation could lead to misclassification of a dichotomous choice between a normal measure and a pathologic measure). Without considering performance, this multicentric French study puts forward limits to the actual algorithm recommended for LVFP pattern assessment. Agreement is excellent in caricatural (easy) cases (left ventricular pressure clearly normal or clearly elevated) but a great discordance exists in the gray zone. Improvement in the algorithm and in the method for LVFP determination is proposed., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest disclosure No commercial products were involved in this study. There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Modern data regarding incidence and modes of death of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) are restricted to tertiary centers or studies of aortic valve replacement (AVR)., Objective: To provide new insights into the natural history of outpatients with native AS based on a large regionwide population study with inclusion by all cardiologists regardless of their mode of practice., Design, Setting, and Participants: Between May 2016 and December 2017, consecutive outpatients with mild (peak aortic velocity, 2.5-2.9 m/s), moderate (peak aortic velocity, 3-3.9 m/s), and severe (peak aortic velocity, ≥4 m/s) native AS graded by echocardiography were included by 117 cardiologists from the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region in France. Analysis took place between August and November 2020., Main Outcomes and Measures: Natural history, need for AVR, and survival of patients with AS were followed up. Indications for AVR were based on current guideline recommendations., Results: Among 2703 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.0 [10.8] years; 1260 [46.6%] women), 233 (8.6%) were recruited in a university public hospital, 757 (28%) in nonuniversity public hospitals, and 1713 (63.4%) by cardiologists working in private practice. A total of 1154 patients (42.7%) had mild, 1122 (41.5%) had moderate, and 427 (15.8%) had severe AS. During a median (interquartile range) of 2.1 (1.4-2.7) years, 634 patients underwent AVR and 448 died prior to AVR. Most deaths were cardiovascular (200 [44.7%]), mainly associated with congestive heart failure (101 [22.6%]) or sudden death (60 [13.4%]). Deaths were noncardiovascular in 186 patients (41.5%) and from unknown causes in 62 patients (13.8%). Compared with patients with mild AS, there was increased cardiovascular mortality in those with moderate (hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.07-2.02]) and severe (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 2.52-5.31]) AS. The differences remained significant when adjusted for baseline characteristics or in time-dependent analyses considering AS progression. In asymptomatic patients, moderate and mild AS were associated with similar cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.44-2.21])., Conclusions and Relevance: While patients in this study with moderate AS had a slightly higher risk of cardiovascular death than patients with mild AS, this risk was much lower than that observed in patients with severe AS. Moreover, in asymptomatic patients, moderate and mild AS were associated with similar cardiovascular mortality.

Background: Poor reproducibility in assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) has been reported., Aim: To investigate the robustness of echocardiographic MR assessment in 2019, based on improvements in technology and the skill of echocardiographists regarding MR quantification., Methods: Reproducibility in parameters of MR severity and global rating were tested using transthoracic echocardiography in 25 consecutive patients independently analysed by 16 junior and senior cardiologists specialized in echocardiography (400 analyses per parameter)., Results: Overall interobserver agreement for mechanism definition, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RVol) was moderate, and was lower in secondary MR. Interobserver agreement was substantial for EROA [0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.75] and moderate for RVol with the PISA method (0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.56) in senior physicians and was fair in junior physicians (0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.51 and 0.36, 95% CI 0.36-0.43, respectively). Using a multiparametric approach, overall interobserver agreement for grading MR severity was fair (0.30), was slightly better in senior than in junior physicians (0.31 vs. 0.28, respectively) with substantial or almost perfect agreement more frequently observed in senior versus junior physicians (52% vs. 36%, respectively)., Conclusion: Reproducible transthoracic echocardiography MR quantification remains challenging in 2019, despite the expected high skills of echocardiographers regarding MR at the time of dedicated percutaneous intervention. The multiparametric approach does not entirely alleviate the substantial dispersion in measurement of MR severity parameters, whereas reader experience seems to partially address the issue. Our study emphasizes the continuing need for multimodality imaging and education in the evaluation of MR among cardiologists., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) imaging is frequently used as an initial screening tool in the evaluation of patients who are candidates for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). However, little is known about the imaging correlation with the gold standard, computed tomographic (CT) imaging. The aims of this study were to test the quantitative differences between these two modalities and to determine the best 3D TEE parameters for TMVR screening., Methods: Fifty-seven patients referred to the heart valve clinic for TMVR with prostheses specifically designed for the mitral valve were included. Mitral annular (MA) analyses were performed using commercially available software on 3D TEE and CT imaging., Results: Three-dimensional TEE imaging was feasible in 52 patients (91%). Although 3D TEE measurements were slightly lower than those obtained on CT imaging, measurements of both projected MA area and perimeter showed excellent correlations, with small differences between the two modalities (r = 0.88 and r = 0.92, respectively, P < .0001). Correlations were significant but lower for MA diameters (r = 0.68-0.72, P < .0001) and mitroaortic angle (r = 0.53, P = .0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that 3D TEE imaging had a good ability to predict TMVR screening success, defined by constructors on the basis of CT measurements, with ranges of 12.9 to 15 cm 2 for MA area (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88-0.91, P < .0001), 128 to 139 mm for MA perimeter (AUC = 0.85-0.91, P < .0001), 35 to 39 mm for anteroposterior diameter (AUC = 0.79-0.84, P < .0001), and 37 to 42 mm for posteromedial-anterolateral diameter (AUC = 0.81-0.89, P < .0001)., Conclusions: Three-dimensional TEE measurements of MA dimensions display strong correlations with CT measurements in patients undergoing TMVR screening. Three-dimensional TEE imaging should be proposed as a reasonable alternative to CT imaging in this vulnerable population., (Copyright © 2020 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pre-operative myocardial fibrosis and remodeling impact on outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We aimed at investigating the prognostic impact of preoperative electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of left ventricular (LV) myocardial damage, i.e. bundle branch block (BBB) and ECG strain pattern after (surgical or transcatheter) AVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS)., Methods: Between April 2008 and October 2017, we explored consecutive patients referred to our Heart Valve Clinic for first AVR for severe AS. Detailed pre-operative phenotyping and ECG analysis were performed. Patients were followed-up after AVR for major cardiac events (ME), i.e. cardiovascular death, cardiac hospitalization for acute heart failure and stroke., Results: BBB and ECG strain were respectively observed in 13.5 and 21% of the 1122 patients included. These ECG markers identified a subgroup of older patients, with higher NYHA class and more advanced myocardial disease as detected by echocardiography, i.e. higher LV mass and lower LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain and integrated backscatter, than patients without ECG strain or BBB. ME occurred in 212 (18.6%) patients during a mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 1.5 years with higher incidence in case of ECG strain or BBB (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.13-2.14, p = 0.006; HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.02-2.13, p = 0.04 respectively). The prognostic value of ECG strain remained significant after adjustment for age, diabetes and pre-operative LVEF., Conclusions: Pre-operative ECG markers of myocardial damage identify a subgroup of AS patients at high risk of post-AVR cardiovascular complications irrespective of other prognostic factors and should help the multiparametric staging of cardiac damage to guide AVR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No disclosures to declare., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)