Search

Aim: To explore the utilization of permanent residential aged care (PRAC), healthcare costs, and mortality for frail compared with non‐frail individuals following their first assessment by an aged care assessment team (ACAT) for a government‐funded home care package. Methods: The study involved people aged 65 years and over who completed their first ACAT assessment in 2013 and were followed for up to 36 months. Frail and non‐frail study participants were matched through caliper matching without replacement to adjust for potential unobserved confounders. Poisson regression estimated the impact of frailty on PRAC admission and mortality rates. Healthcare costs, encompassing hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, primary care consultations, and pharmaceutical use, from ACAT assessment to end of follow‐up, PRAC entry or death were summarized monthly by frailty status. Results: 13 315 non‐frail controls were matched with up to three frail individuals (52 678 total). Frail individuals experienced higher mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–1.83) and greater likelihood of entering PRAC (IRR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.67–1.79) compared with non‐frail individuals. Total healthcare costs over the 3‐year post‐assessment period for 39 363 frail individuals were $1 277 659 900, compared with expected costs of $885 322 522 had they not been frail. The primary contributor to the mean monthly excess cost per frail individual (mean = $457, SD = 3192) was hospital admissions ($345; 75%). Conclusions: Frailty is associated with higher rates of mortality and of entering PRAC, and excess costs of frailty are substantial and sustained over time. These findings emphasize the potential economic value of providing home care for older people before they become frail. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 939–947. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Home care packages (HCPs) facilitate older individuals to remain at home, with longer HCP wait times associated with increased mortality risk. We analyze healthcare cost data pre‐ and post‐HCP access to inform hypotheses around the effects of healthcare use and mortality risk. Methods: Regression models were used to assess the impact of delayed HCP access on healthcare costs and to compare costs whilst waiting and in the 6‐ and 12 month periods post‐HCP access for 16 629 older adults. Results: Average wait time for a HCP was 89.7 days (SD = 125.6) during the study period. Wait‐time length had no impact on any healthcare cost category or time period. However, total per day healthcare costs were higher in the 6 and 12 months post‐receipt of a HCP (AU$61.5, AU$63, respectively) compared with those in the time waiting for a HCP (AU$48.1). Inpatient care accounted for a higher proportion of total healthcare costs post‐HCP (AU$45.1, AU$46.3, respectively) compared with in the wait time (AU$30.6), whilst spending on medical services and pharmaceuticals reduced slightly in the 6 month (AU$7.1, AU$6.3) and 12 month (AU$7.2, AU$6.3) post‐HCP periods compared with in the wait time (AU$7.9, AU$7.1). Conclusions: Increased spending post‐HCP on inpatient care or non‐health support afforded by HCPs may offer protective effects for mortality and risk of admission to aged care. Further research should explore the association between delayed access to inpatient care for geriatric syndromes and mortality to inform recommendations on extensions to residential care outreach services into the community to improve the timely identification of the need for inpatient care. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 899–905. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication following emergency laparotomy, occurring in around 25% of patients in UK practice. The adoption of single‐use negative‐pressure dressings (SUNPDs) has been proposed as a prophylactic method of reducing the rate of SSI. The primary aim of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) described herein is to determine if a SUNPD reduces SSI at 30 days after an emergency laparotomy. Method: The Single Use Negative pRessure dressing for Reduction In Surgical site infection following Emergency laparotomy (SUNRRISE) study is an international, multicentre, pragmatic, phase III RCT with internal feasibility phase. As stated, the primary aim is to determine if a SUNPD reduces SSI at 30 days postoperatively. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a SUNPD or a dressing of the surgeon's preference. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure is SSI within 30 days of surgery as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control criteria. A total of 840 patients will be required to detect a relative reduction of 40% in SSI rates (from 25% to 15%) with 90% power accounting for a 20% attrition rate. Discussion: SUNRRISE is an international, multicentre RCT evaluating the prophylactic use of SUNPD in primary closed emergency laparotomy wounds for the reduction of SSI. Our hypothesis is that a SUNPD is superior to the surgeon's preference of dressing in reducing SSIs at 30 days. The findings may influence dressing choice following emergency abdominal surgery in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Frailty In Residential Sector over Time (FIRST) Study is a 3-year prospective cohort study investigating the health of residents living in residential aged care services (RACS) in South Australia. The study aims to examine the change in frailty status and associated health outcomes.Methods: This interim report presents data from March 2019-October 2020. The study setting is 12 RACS from one organisation across metropolitan and rural South Australia involving 1243 residents. All permanent (i.e. respite or transition care program excluded) residents living in the RACS for at least 8 weeks were invited to participate. Residents who were deemed to be medically unstable (e.g. experiencing delirium), have less than 3 months to live, or not fluent in English were excluded. Data collected included frailty status, medical diagnoses, medicines, pain, nutrition, sarcopenia, falls, dementia, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, quality of life, satisfaction with care, activities of daily living, and life space use at baseline and 12-months. Data Linkage will occur over the 3 years from baseline.Results: A total of 561 permanent residents (mean age 87.69 ± 7.25) were included. The majority of residents were female (n = 411, 73.3%) with 95.3% (n = 527) being classified as either frail (n = 377, 68.2%) or most-frail (n = 150, 27.1%) according to the Frailty Index (FI). Most residents were severely impaired in their basic activities of daily living (n = 554, 98.8%), and were at-risk of malnutrition (n = 305, 55.0%) and at-risk of sarcopenia (n = 492, 89.5%). Most residents did not experience pain (n = 475, 85.4%), had normal daytime sleepiness (n = 385, 69.7%), and low anxiety and depression scores (n = 327, 58.9%).Conclusion: This study provides valuable information on the health and frailty levels of residents living in RACS in South Australia. The results will assist in developing interventions that can help to improve the health and wellbeing of residents in aged care services.Trial Registration: Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619000500156 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]