Search

To evaluate whether ketoconazole or cimetidine alter the pharmacokinetics of loratadine, or its major metabolite, desloratadine (DCL), or alter the effects of loratadine or DCL on electrocardiographic repolarization in healthy adult volunteers.Two randomized, evaluator-blind, multiple-dose, three-way crossover drug interaction studies were performed. In each study, subjects received three 10 day treatments in random sequence, separated by a 14 day washout period. The treatments were loratadine alone, cimetidine or ketoconazole alone, or loratadine plus cimetidine or ketoconazole. The primary study endpoint was the difference in mean QTc intervals from baseline to day 10. In addition, plasma concentrations of loratadine, DCL, and ketoconazole or cimetidine were obtained on day 10.Concomitant administration of loratadine and ketoconazole significantly increased the loratadine plasma concentrations (307%; 90% CI 205-428%) and DCL concentrations (73%; 62-85%) compared with administration of loratadine alone. Concomitant administration of loratadine and cimetidine significantly increased the loratadine plasma concentrations (103% increase; 70-142%) but not DCL concentrations (6% increase; 1-11%) compared with administration of loratadine alone. Cimetidine or ketoconazole plasma concentrations were unaffected by coadministration with loratadine. Despite increased concentrations of loratadine and DCL, there were no statistically significant differences for the primary electrocardiographic repolarization parameter (QTc) among any of the treatment groups. No other clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of loratadine were observed as assessed by electrocardiographic parameters (mean (90% CI) QTc changes: loratadine vs loratadine + ketoconazole = 3.6 ms (-2.2, 9.4); loratadine vs loratadine + cimetidine = 3.2 ms (-1.6, 7.9)), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events.Loratadine 10 mg daily was devoid of any effects on electrocardiographic parameters when coadministered for 10 days with therapeutic doses of ketoconazole or cimetidine in healthy volunteers. It is concluded that, although there was a significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ketoconazole or cimetidine and loratadine, this effect was not accompanied by a change in the QTc interval in healthy adult volunteers.

To determine the effects of IL-10 on cytokine and granulocyte responses during endotoxemia, two groups of eight healthy male volunteers were challenged with endotoxin (4 ng/kg) on two occasions, once in combination with placebo injection, and once in conjunction with i.v. administered recombinant human IL-10 (rhIL-10) (25 microg/kg). In group 1, rhIL-10 was administered 2 min before endotoxin challenge; in group 2, the intervention was delayed for 1 h after endotoxin administration. rhIL-10 pretreatment reduced the LPS-induced rises in temperature and release of TNF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1 receptor antagonist. Endotoxin-induced granulocyte accumulation in lungs, as determined by dynamic granuloscintigrams, was prevented by rhIL-10 pretreatment, whereas granulocyte recruitment in liver and spleen was only modestly reduced. In addition, granulocyte degranulation, as measured by plasma elastase/alpha1-antitrypsin complexes, was blunted significantly by rhIL-10 pretreatment. Post-treatment with rhIL-10 did not influence LPS-induced temperature responses, cytokine release, or granulocyte degranulation. Both rhIL-10 pretreatment and post-treatment reduced LPS-induced cortisol levels. These results indicate that pretreatment with rhIL-10 reduces endotoxin-induced febrile responses, cytokine responses, and granulocyte accumulation in lungs, while in this acute model post-treatment with rhIL-10 exerts limited anti-inflammatory effects.

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) has been found to inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tissue factor expression by monocytes in vitro. To determine the effects of IL-10 on LPS-induced activation of the hemostatic mechanisms in vivo, we performed a placebo-controlled, cross-over study of human endotoxemia. Two groups of eight volunteers were challenged with LPS (4 ng/kg) on two occasions: once in conjunction with placebo, and once with recombinant human IL-10 (rhIL-10; 25 microg/kg). In group 1, placebo or rhIL-10 was given 2 minutes before LPS challenge, group 2 received placebo or rhIL-10 1 hour after LPS administration. Pretreatment with rhIL-10 reduced both LPS-induced activation of the fibrinolytic system (plasma concentrations of tissue type plasminogen activator, plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complexes, and D-dimer), and inhibition of fibrinolysis (plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1), whereas posttreatment only inhibited the latter response. Both IL-10 pre- and posttreatment attenuated activation of the coagulation system (plasma levels of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin complexes). These results indicate that rhIL-10, besides its well-described inhibitory effects on cytokine release, potently modulates the fibrinolytic system and inhibits the coagulant responses during endotoxemia

To assess the possible occurrence of pharmacokinetic interactions between the antiepileptic agents felbamate and vigabatrin, two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers. In Study I, 18 subjects received oral vigabatrin 1000 mg every 12 h for two 8 day periods with felbamate 1200 mg every 12 h or placebo. In Study II, 18 other volunteers were administered oral felbamate 1200 mg every 12 h for two 8 day periods with vigabatrin 1000 mg every 12 h or placebo. On the eighth day of each treatment period, blood and urine samples were collected over 12 h for determination of the active S(+)- and inactive R(-)-vigabatrin enantiomer concentrations (Study I) or felbamate concentrations (Study II). In Study I, the pharmacokinetic parameters of R(-)-vigabatrin were similar during co-administration with felbamate or placebo. Felbamate produced a 13% increase in AUC(0,12 h) and an 8% increase in urinary excretion of S(+)-vigabatrin. Although these changes were statistically significant, their magnitude was small. In Study II, the pharmacokinetic parameters of felbamate were similar during concurrent administration with vigabatrin or placebo. These data indicate that there are no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between felbamate and vigabatrin in man