Search

Background: Everolimus is beneficial for patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, some patients developed drug resistance and the well-established predictor for everolimus efficacy was limited. Objectives: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of everolimus in different treatment lines and identify several clinicopathological markers to estimate everolimus efficacy in patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. Design: This was a retrospective and multicenter study. Methods: Between 2014 and 2022, more than 2000 patients with tumors who received everolimus were collected from multiple cancer centers in China (National Cancer Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute). A training cohort and two validation cohorts were developed. Results: The training cohort included 338 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for everolimus was 5.6 months, with an objective response rate of 25.1% and a clinical benefit rate of 54.4%. PFS was significantly worse from first-line (1L) to second-line (2L) to third-line (3L), with PFS1L for 13.5 months, PFS2L for 6.1 months, and PFS3L for 4.1 months (p = 2.9e−6, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61–0.82). The clinicopathological characteristics, including post-1L everolimus treatment, Ki67 index of more than 40%, more than two metastatic sites at first recurrence, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, were independent risk factors for PFS. A predictive model for everolimus efficacy was established using these four factors. In the low-risk group, patients achieved a median PFS of 12.6 months, significantly longer compared to 2.7 months for those in the high-risk group (p = 2.4e−64, HR = 9.41, 95% CI = 7.05–12.56). The area under the curve was 0.96, 0.95, and 0.94 for 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year PFS, respectively. Internal validation cohort (PFS 18.4 vs 3.1 months, p = 3.6e−11, HR = 3.78, 95% CI = 2.49–5.74) and external validation cohort (PFS 13.5 vs 3.1 months, p = 2.9e−10, HR = 11.53, 95% CI = 4.68–28.37) confirmed its power for estimating clinical benefits of everolimus. Conclusion: A predictive model was successfully established to predict survival outcomes for everolimus in patients with HR+/HER2− ABC, which may provide references for the management of everolimus in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Alpelisib plus fulvestrant demonstrated a significant progression-free survival benefit versus fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) (SOLAR-1). Hyperglycemia, an on-target adverse effect of PI3Kα inhibition, can lead to dose modifications, potentially impacting alpelisib efficacy. We report data from preclinical models and two clinical trials (SOLAR-1 and BYLieve) on Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use to improve PI3Kα inhibitor–associated hyperglycemia. Methods: Healthy Brown Norway (BN), mild diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF), and Rat1-myr-p110α/HBRX3077 tumor–bearing nude rats treated with alpelisib were analyzed for glucose and insulin control with metformin and dapagliflozin (SGLT2i) and alpelisib efficacy. Hyperglycemia adverse events (AEs) were compared between patients receiving SGLT2i with alpelisib (n = 19) and a propensity score–matched cohort not receiving SGLT2i (n = 74) in both trials. Results: Dapagliflozin and metformin in BN and ZDF rats treated with alpelisib normalized blood glucose and reduced insulin levels. No signs of ketosis or drug-drug interaction were observed when metformin and dapagliflozin was administered with alpelisib. Alpelisib antitumor efficacy was maintained when used with dapagliflozin in tumor-bearing rats. Compared with a matched set of patients without SGLT2i, patients receiving SGLT2i had 4.9 and 6.4 times lower rates of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia AEs and hyperglycemia AEs resulting in alpelisib dose adjustments, interruptions, or withdrawals, respectively, and a relative reduction in risk of experiencing these AEs (70.6% and 35.7%). Conclusion: These data suggest adding an SGLT2i can effectively manage hyperglycemia, resulting in fewer alpelisib dose modifications and discontinuations in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2− ABC (SOLAR-1: NCT02437318; BYLieve: NCT03056755). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines. Results: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40–1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45–1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72–1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56–1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases. Conclusions: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To report treatment patterns and quality of life (QoL) in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients. Methods: Data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey in Europe and USA. Results: Hormone plus targeted therapy was the most frequent first-line (1L, 62%) and second-line (2L, 45%) treatment for HR+/HER2-patients. Chemotherapy was most frequent at third-line or greater (3L+, 39%) for HR+/HER2- patients, 2L (51%) and 3L+ (48%) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Time to progression was 13.8 (2L) and 11.0 (3L+) months for HR+/HER2- patients. No comparisons were observed for TNBC patients. EQ-5D-5L scores were highest in patients at 1L and lowest at 3L+. Conclusion: Reduced QoL and treatment response were reported in patients at later lines of therapy. Plain Language Summary Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Differences in survival are seen depending on how widespread or advanced the cancer is, how many different treatments the patient has been given, as well as whether certain receptors on the tumor are present or absent. Many new treatments are available which can target these receptors. These treatments have improved survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, but other benefits for the patient are not always clear. In addition, differences between countries are possible as official guidance can vary. This study aimed to understand these issues, by asking physicians and their patients across Europe and USA for their views on quality of life and satisfaction with their treatments. We found that, in general, physicians prescribed treatments as recommended in the treatment guidelines. As breast cancer progressed and treatment stopped working, patients were switched on to different treatments. Survival, quality of life and treatment satisfaction were all worse in patients who had switched treatments. It appears that the patients lose confidence that their new treatment will work to improve their quality of life. We also saw differences in some of these outcomes between Europe and USA, which were likely due to differences in the treatment guidelines between countries. Both quality of life and treatment satisfaction are important for the well-being of patients with advanced breast cancer as they now live longer with these new treatments. This should be considered by physicians and taken into account for future work. Given the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC), the aim of this analysis was to describe treatment patterns, quality of life (QoL) outcomes, and treatment satisfaction at subsequent treatment lines (first- [1L], second- [2L]; third/later- [3L+] lines) among patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor-negative (HER2-) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in Europe (France, Italy and Spain) and USA in a real-world setting. Data were drawn from the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their consulting patients conducted in Europe and the USA 2019–2020. Median time to progression at 2L and 3L was 13.8 and 11.0 months for patients with HR+/HER2, and 8.0 and 4.6 months, respectively for TNBC patients; patient overall response rates at 1L, 2L and 3L+ were 54, 53 and 42%, respectively. The average EuroQol-5 dimensions-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) health utility score of HR+/HER2- and TNBC patients was 0.77 at 1L, 0.70 and 0.71 at 2L, and 0.65 and 0.79 at 3L+, respectively; EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale mean score was 70.9, 67.4, and 63.4 for HR+/HER2- patients, and 69.4, 65.2, and 65.8 for TNBC patients, at 1L, 2L and 3L+, respectively. The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status mean score was 64.6, 60.0 and 57.7 for HR+/HER2- patients, and 64.0, 61.2 and 59.3 for TNBC patients, at 1L, 2L and 3L+, respectively; there was a small meaningful difference between scores at 1L and at 2L and 3L+. EORTC scores were generally higher at 1L and lower at 3L+ in HR+/HER2- patients' functioning and symptoms. This differed for TNBC patients where scores were higher in 3L+ patients compared with 2L patients for physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning. Meaningful differences in the scores at 2L and/or 3L+ were seen for most functioning scales, particularly in cognitive functioning and social functioning, and over half of the symptom scales in HR+/HER2- patients. Physicians were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with current treatment for 77%, HR+/HER2- and 68% TNBC patients on 1L, 73% HR+/HER2- and 57% TNBC patients on 2L, and 59% HR+/HER2- and 54% TNBC patients on 3L+; likewise, patients' treatment satisfaction was reduced for both patient populations. This analysis demonstrated that patients with HR+/HER2- and triple negative ABC treated with 3L+ therapy, compared with patients treated with 1L or 2L therapies, reported a reduction in QoL, while concurrently, time to progression was shorter and overall response rate was poorer; similarly, satisfaction with treatment was reduced for both physicians and patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and the safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously used anthracyclines. Methods: The clinical data of 79 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with PLD-contained regimen in our hospital from May 2019 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical efficacy, influencing factors and adverse reactions were evaluated between the group of PDL re-use and initial use. Results: Among 79 patients, 65 patients could be evaluated for efficacy, of which the objective response rate (ORR) was 13.85%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 63.08%. In HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer, the ORR was 20.00%, the DCR was 75.00%, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.23 months. The most common adverse reactions are bone marrow suppression, hand foot syndrome, and oral mucositis. Conclusion: The adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin liposomes can achieve good efficacy in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, and the anti HER-2 treatment combined with doxorubicin liposomes has better efficacy and safety in the treatment of HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction There is a paucity of data on platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC) from developing countries like India. Objectives The objectives were to analyze the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ABC. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of 35 patients with ABC who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine and carboplatin, [GC]) in a tertiary cancer center in India from August 2015 to November 2019. The inclusion criteria were patients with ABC, who had received palliative chemotherapy with GC. The exclusion criteria were patients who had received less than two cycles of GC and patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. Results The median age was 45 years (range: 28-68 years). All patients were female (97%) except one male (3%). The histology was ductal carcinoma (77%), mixed (17%), and others (6%). Out of the 12 patients tested for breast cancer (BRCA) genemutation, six patients had a BRCA mutation. Patients with metastatic and locally progressive disease were 91 and 9%, respectively. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy for metastatic disease was 1 (range: 0-5). The median number of sites of metastasis was 2 (range: 0-5). Patients with visceral crises were 23%. The median number of cycles of GC chemotherapy received was 6 (range: 2-6). A dose reduction in chemotherapy was done in 74%. The responses among 34 evaluable patients were complete response (11%), partial response (24%), stable disease (41%), and progressive disease (24%). Grade 3 or more hematological and nonhematological toxicities were observed in 69 and 9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 8 months, respectively. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 19 and 34%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had received more than 3 cycles had a better outcome. Conclusion GC was an active and well-tolerated regimen in ABC regardless of the receptor status. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to assess the optimal regimen in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Initial treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) typically involves endocrine therapy (ET) combined with different targeted agents. When hormonal therapies fail, until recently, the only option available was chemotherapy (ChT), presenting a significant therapeutic challenge. However, the recent introduction of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has provided new treatment alternatives in this context. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2)-targeting ADC, has been evaluated following disease progression to ET and ChT in HR+/HER2- ABC. Areas covered: This review examines the latest clinical trials, including phase I/II and III studies and evaluates the impact of SG on HR+/HER2- ABC. The literature search focused on clinical outcomes, particularly regarding efficacy and safety, comparing them with traditional ChT. Expert opinion: SG has demonstrated to be an effective treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC after progression to ET and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) in any setting, and at least two ChT-containing regimens in the advanced setting. With a manageable toxicity profile, SG represents a significant advancement in the treatment landscape for this patient population. However, further research is essential to optimize its application and establish long-term benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is a heterogeneous disease with varied prognoses, that is affected by many clinicopathological features. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment (FLx), and prognostic impact of these features on survival among Syrian patients with ABC. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ABC. The association of clinicopathological factors with survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, as well as the Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HaR). Results: A total of 423 patients with ABC were included in the study, with a median age (range) of 47 years (23-82). 83% of metastases were metachronous. Most patients (91.8%) received chemotherapy as the FLx. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all the patients were 7 and 16 months, respectively. The median PFS was associated with four factors, which were time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=1.861, 95% CI 1.420-2.438, P<0.0001), performance status (PS) (adjusted HaR=1.456, 95% CI 1.049-2.021, P=0.025), ovarian metastasis (adjusted HaR=7.907, 95% CI 1.049-59.576, P=0.045), and FLx (adjusted HaR=2.536, 95% CI 1.581-4.068, P<0.0001). Similarly, the OS was associated with three factors, including hormone receptors (HRs) status (adjusted HaR=1.124, 95% CI 1.009-1.252, P=0.034), time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=2.099, 95% CI 1.588-2.775, P<0.0001), and PS (adjusted HaR=1.787, 95% CI 1.429-2.233, P<0.0001). In the HR-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-negative group, endocrine therapy was significantly associated with longer PFS compared with chemotherapy (15 vs 7 months, adjusted HaR=2.699, 95% CI 1.417-5.143, P=0.003). Furthermore, there was no difference in OS between the two treatment modalities (P=0.855). Conclusions: ABC survival varies depending on the location of metastases. Good PS and synchronous stage 4 disease were independent prognostic factors for longer PFS and OS. In the HR-positive/HER2-negative group, PFS for endocrine therapy was significantly longer than chemotherapy, with no differences in OS. This study confirms that endocrine therapy is preferred as an FLx for ABC in the HR-positive/HER2-negative group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dalpiciclib is a novel cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor which showed tolerability and preliminary efficacy as monotherapy for pretreated advanced breast cancer (BC). Objectives: To further assess dalpiciclib with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC. Design: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib trial. Methods: Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic BC were enrolled in five cohorts. Patients without prior treatment for advanced disease (cohorts 1–2) were given dalpiciclib (125 or 150 mg) plus letrozole/anastrozole; patients who progressed after ET (cohorts 3–5) were given dalpiciclib (125, 150, or 175 mg) plus fulvestrant. Dalpiciclib was administered orally once daily in 3-weeks-on/1-week off schedule. The primary endpoint was safety. Results: A total of 58 patients received dalpiciclib with letrozole/anastrozole and 46 received dalpiciclib with fulvestrant. No maximum tolerated dose of dalpiciclib was reached with letrozole/anastrozole or fulvestrant. Across all cohorts, 86.7%–93.8% of patients had a grade ⩾3 adverse event, with the most common being neutropenia (grade 3, 40.0% for dalpiciclib 175 mg and 61.8%–87.5% for lower doses; grade 4, 46.7% and 4.2%–20.6%, respectively) and leukopenia (grade 3, 80.0% for 175 mg and 33.3%–54.2% for lower doses; grade 4, 0% for all doses). At tested dose levels, steady-state areas under the concentration curve and peak concentration of dalpiciclib increased with dose when combined with letrozole/anastrozole and fulvestrant. Dalpiciclib at 150 mg was associated with a numerically higher objective response rate in both patients untreated for advanced disease (67.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49.5–82.6) and patients progressing after ET (53.3%; 95% CI 26.6–78.7); as of July 30, 2022, the median progression-free survival with dalpiciclib 150 mg was 24.1 months (95% CI 16.9–46.0) with letrozole/anastrozole and 16.7 months (95% CI 1.9–24.1) with fulvestrant. Conclusion: Dalpiciclib plus letrozole/anastrozole or fulvestrant showed an acceptable safety profile. The recommended phase III dose of dalpiciclib was 150 mg. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03481998. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the global phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study (NCT03734029), the anti-human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with manageable safety compared with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had received 1–2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Methods: This subgroup analysis examined the efficacy and safety of T-DXd versus TPC in 213 patients from Asian countries and regions who were enrolled in the DESTINY-Breast04 trial and randomized to T-DXd (n = 147) or TPC (n = 66). Results: Median PFS with T-DXd and TPC was 10.9 and 5.3 months, respectively, in Asian patients with hormone receptor-positive mBC, and 10.9 and 4.6 months, respectively, in the overall Asian population. In both populations, median OS was not reached with T-DXd and was 19.9 months with TPC. The objective response rate was higher with T-DXd versus TPC in all Asian patients. Median treatment duration was 8.4 months with T-DXd and 3.5 months with TPC. The most common grade ≥ 3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events in Asian patients treated with T-DXd were neutropenia (16.3%), anemia (12.9%), and leukopenia (11.6%); the incidences of neutropenia and leukopenia were higher with TPC versus T-DXd. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis with T-DXd was 14.3%; the majority of events were grade 1–2. Conclusions: T-DXd demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits versus TPC in Asian HER2-low mBC patients, regardless of hormone receptor status, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03734029. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is a critical factor in decision-making for advanced breast cancer (ABC). There is a need to improve how QOL and treatment-related side effects (SEs) that impact it are clinically assessed. We examined healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients perspectives on the importance of QOL discussions and the impact of SEs on QOL in clinical settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (7/2020-5/2021) among oncologists, nurses, and patients with HR+/HER2- ABC in 7 countries. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 502 HCPs and 467 patients. Overall, 88% of oncologists and 49% of patients recalled QOL discussions at follow-up. In the first- through fourth-line (1L, 2L, 3L, and 4L) settings, respectively, 48%, 57%, 79%, and 85% of oncologists reported QOL was very important; 73% and 45% of patients receiving 1L and 2L treatment and 40% receiving 3L+ treatment indicated QOL was important. Patients reported that insomnia, anxiety, back pain, fatigue, diarrhea, hot flashes, low sexual interest, and loss of appetite had a moderate/severe impact on QOL. Of patients experiencing certain SEs, ≥64% did not discuss them with HCPs until there was a moderate/severe impact on QOL. In patients receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor, SEs, including insomnia, diarrhea, back pain, and fatigue, had a moderate/severe impact on QOL. CONCLUSIONS: This survey discovered disconnects between HCPs and patients with ABC on the importance of QOL discussions and the impact of SEs on QOL. These data support the use of ABC-specific QOL questionnaires that closely monitor SEs impacting QOL.

Current evidence from both randomized trials and real-world studies suggests that older patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2) breast cancer derive clinical benefit from the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy. However, a higher risk for adverse events due to CDK4/6 inhibitors among older patients is evident, leading to a trend of initiating CDK4/6 inhibitors at lower dose in clinical practice, though without evidence. The aim of the IMPORTANT-trial, a pragmatic, multinational, open-label, partly decentralized randomized trial is to investigate whether lower starting dose of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy is comparable to full dose in older (≥70 years old) patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer who are assessed as vulnerable or frail based on comprehensive geriatric assessment. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT06044623 (ClinicalTrials.gov); Registration date: 13 September 2023. Article highlights Breast cancer treatment overview in older patients In patients with advanced hormone receptor- (HR-) positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, the combination of endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors is the standard of care as initial treatment approach. Older cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, including pivotal trials on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Real-world evidence studies have showed that older patients are at increased risk for adverse events when treated with implementation of CDK4/6 inhibitors; lower initial dose is common in clinical practice, though without evidence. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) seems to be a reliable tool for the optimization of treatment strategy in older cancer patients. IMPORTANT trial design IMPORTANT is pragmatic, multi-national, open-label, partly de-centralized randomized trial investigating whether a lower initial dose of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy is comparable to a full dose in older (≥70 years old) patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer that are assessed as vulnerable or frail based on CGA. Eligible patients are older female or male patients (≥70 years old) with advanced HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, not amenable for curative treatment and without prior therapy for advanced disease. The follow-up strategy in terms of treatment efficacy and toxicity resembles the current follow-up strategy in clinical practice without additional blood tests or radiological examinations. The follow-up will include toxicity evaluation before each treatment cycle as well as clinical and radiological evaluation of treatment efficacy every 3 months. Patient-reported outcomes will be captured through self-questionnaires during the study period. A total of 495 patients are to be enrolled with 30-month accrual period with aim to recruit 149 patients for the fit cohort to be treated and followed, and 346 patients for the vulnerable/ frail cohort to be randomized. Categorization & randomization in IMPORTANT trial Patients will be categorized based on self-reported CGA to fit or vulnerable/frail depending on domains of age metrics that are impaired. Patients categorized as vulnerable/frail will be randomized (1:1) to -1 level lower initial dose or full dose of CDK 4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy. Stratification factors during randomization are the type of CDK4/6 inhibitor used (palbociclib vs ribociclib vs abemaciclib), the type of endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors vs fulvestrant) and the level of vulnerability based on CGA (vulnerable vs frail). IMPORTANT trial end points The primary end point is time-to-treatment failure; secondary end points include overall treatment utility, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, time to chemotherapy initiation, toxicity, quality-of-life (QoL), time to QoL deterioration and cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is this summary about? This is a summary of the article discussing the results of the CAPItello-291 study. In the study, participants had advanced breast cancer that could not be completely removed with surgery, and that was diagnosed as a type of breast cancer where tumor cells had hormone receptors (HR-positive) but did not have HER2 receptors (HER2-negative). All participants were also required to have previously received treatment with a type of therapy called an aromatase inhibitor (with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor), but over time their cancer cells had still grown or spread. The CAPItello-291 study researchers wanted to find out if a treatment combination of the medications capivasertib plus fulvestrant worked better than placebo plus fulvestrant. Capivasertib is a drug that blocks the activity of a protein called AKT, which is found inside breast cancer cells. What are the key takeaways? The main finding was that participants who took capivasertib plus fulvestrant lived longer without their disease getting worse (progressing) compared with those treated with placebo plus fulvestrant. This is called progression-free survival. This result was seen across all participants (median progression-free survival of 7.2 months with capivasertib plus fulvestrant vs 3.6 months with placebo plus fulvestrant). It was also seen in participants whose tumors had detectable genetic alterations in genes called PIK3CA, AKT1, and/ or PTEN (median progression-free survival of 7.3 months with capivasertib plus fulvestrant vs 3.1 months with placebo plus fulvestrant). The most common side effects experienced by participants included diarrhea and different types of rash. These were as expected (given how capivasertib works). The CAPItello-291 study is still ongoing, and more results are expected to be released in the future. What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the CAPItello-291 study showed that capivasertib plus fulvestrant compared with placebo plus fulvestrant improved progression-free survival in participants with HR-positive/ HER2-negative advanced breast cancer whose cancer had grown or spread despite hormone therapy (with/without a CDK4/6 inhibitor). Clinical Trial Registration:NCT04305496 (CAPItello-291) (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. Patient-reported outcome measures are used to evaluate patients’ health-related quality of life in clinical breast cancer studies. This study evaluated the structure, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) subscales in a clinical trial featuring patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (aBC), and estimated NFBSI-16 meaningful change thresholds. Methods Data from 101 patients with aBC enrolled in a phase II trial (Xenera-1) were included for psychometric evaluation of the NFBSI-16. Subscale structure was evaluated by assessing inter-item correlations, item-total correlations, and internal consistency (cycles 2 and 5). Validity was assessed using scale-level convergent validity (cycles 2 and 5) and known-groups (Baseline). Reliability was analysed via test-retest at cycles 3–4, and responsiveness to improvement and worsening was evaluated at cycles 5, 7, and 9. Meaningful change thresholds were estimated using anchor-based methods (supported by distribution-based methods) at cycles 5, 7, and 9. Results NFBSI-16 internal consistency was acceptable, but item-total correlations suggested that its subscales and the GP5 item (side-effect of treatment) scores may be preferred over a total score. Convergent and known-groups evidence supported NFBSI-16 validity. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for Total and DRS-P (disease-related symptoms: physical) scales, and moderate for the GP5 item. Responsiveness to worsening was generally demonstrated, but responsiveness to improvement could not be demonstrated due to limited observed improvement. Anchor-based meaningful change thresholds were estimated for DRS-P and Total scores. Conclusion This study provides evidence that the NFBSI-16 has desirable psychometric properties for use in clinical studies in aBC. It also provides estimates of group- and individual-level meaningful change thresholds to facilitate score interpretation in future aBC research.

Abstract Aims This investigation aims to elucidate the treatment status of advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients in Hunan Province of Central Southern China from November 2021 to December 2022. Methods Data from 301 patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer were collected from the breast cancer investigation project in Hunan under the guidance of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncolfogy (CSCO). The data included the clinical characteristics of patients and the status of first-line and second-line rescue treatment. Results First-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 40% (121/301) and 60% (180/301) of treatments, respectively. AI (21%), AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (28%), and fulvestrant (24%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (18%) were the most common first-line endocrine therapies. Taxane-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line chemotherapy (59%). Second-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 43% (72/166) and 57% (94/166) of treatments, respectively. Fulvestrant (23%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (29%) were the most common second-line endocrine therapies. The prevalences of AI and AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor decreased to 19% and 11%, respectively. T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Third-line chemotherapy was more prevalent than endocrine therapy (57% vs. 41%). T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor was the most common endocrine therapy (33%). AI, AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, and fulvestrant accounted for 21%, 12% and 18% of third-line endocrine therapies, respectively. Conclusions Compared to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy was a more favorable choice for first-line and second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients in Hunan Province.

The classification of breast cancer (BC) by immunohistochemical phenotypes is widely used in routine clinical practice. However, the genetic profile of the tumor does not always correspond to the pathomorphological one, which can significantly affect the prognosis and predict the effectiveness of therapy in BC. This literature review examines the effectiveness of endocrine therapy depending on the internal subtype of BC, and also presents data on the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in these subgroups. It has been shown that during metastasis, the tumor acquires a more aggressive subtype (for example, it switches from luminal to HER2-E or basal-like), which can be stopped when using CDK4/6 inhibitors: the change of the internal subtype passes into a more favorable group.

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard-of-care for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2− advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the impact of CDK4/6i on circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET (CDK4/6i+ET) remains poorly understood. This was a prospective cohort study including 44 patients with ER+/HER2− mBC treated with CDK4/6i+ET in either first or second line. Peripheral blood samples were collected before (baseline) and 3 months (t2) after therapy. Immune cell's subsets were quantified by flow cytometry, and microfluidic-captured CTCs were counted and classified according to the expression of cytokeratin and/or vimentin. Patients were categorized according to response as responders (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥ 6.0 months; 79.1%) and non-responders (PFS < 6.0 months; 20.9%). CDK4/6i+ET resulted in significant changes in the hematological parameters, including decreased hemoglobin levels and increased mean corpuscular volume, as well as reductions in neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil counts. Specific immune cell subsets, such as early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and Vδ2+ T cells expressing NKG2D, decreased 3 months after CDK4/6i+ET. Additionally, correlations between the presence of CTCs and immune cell populations were observed, highlighting the interplay between immune dysfunction and tumor dissemination. This study provides insights into the immunomodulatory effects of CDK4/6i+ET, underscoring the importance of considering immune dynamics in the management of ER+/HER2− mBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib) have been recommended in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer in China. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors by processing survival data using fractional polynomial modeling methods. Methods: Phase II or III randomized controlled trials in treatment-naive HR + patients with advanced breast cancer were systematically searched through the preset search strategy. The fractional polynomial (FP) model was used to relax the proportional hazard assumption and obtain time-varying hazard ratio (HR). Progression-free life years (PFLYs) and life years (LYs) were calculated from the area under curve (AUC) of the predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves to evaluate the long-term efficacy benefit. Odds ratio (OR) of grade≥3 adverse events were analyzed for safety outcomes. Results: 6 randomized controlled trials with 2,638 patients were included. The first-order FP model (p = -1) and the first-order FP model (p = 1) were used to calculate the time-varying HR of PFS and OS, respectively. Extrapolating to 240 months, abemaciclib obtained a PFS benefit of 3.059 PFLYs and 6.275 LYs by calculating the AUC of the PFS and OS curves. Palbociclib obtained 2.302 PFLYs and 6.351 LYs. Ribociclib obtained 2.636 PFLYs and 6.543 LYs. In terms of safety, the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors resulted in a higher risk of adverse events (OR = 9.84, 95% CI: 8.13-11.95), especially for palbociclib (OR = 14.04, 95% CI: 10.52-18.90). Conclusion: The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in treatment-naive patients with HR + advanced breast cancer significantly improves survival, but also increases the risk of adverse events. Abemaciclib and ribociclib may be the best options for prolonging PFS and OS in treatment-naïve patients, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. Patient-reported outcome measures are used to evaluate patients' health-related quality of life in clinical breast cancer studies. This study evaluated the structure, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) subscales in a clinical trial featuring patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (aBC), and estimated NFBSI-16 meaningful change thresholds. Methods: Data from 101 patients with aBC enrolled in a phase II trial (Xenera-1) were included for psychometric evaluation of the NFBSI-16. Subscale structure was evaluated by assessing inter-item correlations, item-total correlations, and internal consistency (cycles 2 and 5). Validity was assessed using scale-level convergent validity (cycles 2 and 5) and known-groups (Baseline). Reliability was analysed via test-retest at cycles 3–4, and responsiveness to improvement and worsening was evaluated at cycles 5, 7, and 9. Meaningful change thresholds were estimated using anchor-based methods (supported by distribution-based methods) at cycles 5, 7, and 9. Results: NFBSI-16 internal consistency was acceptable, but item-total correlations suggested that its subscales and the GP5 item (side-effect of treatment) scores may be preferred over a total score. Convergent and known-groups evidence supported NFBSI-16 validity. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for Total and DRS-P (disease-related symptoms: physical) scales, and moderate for the GP5 item. Responsiveness to worsening was generally demonstrated, but responsiveness to improvement could not be demonstrated due to limited observed improvement. Anchor-based meaningful change thresholds were estimated for DRS-P and Total scores. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the NFBSI-16 has desirable psychometric properties for use in clinical studies in aBC. It also provides estimates of group- and individual-level meaningful change thresholds to facilitate score interpretation in future aBC research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy. In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2− ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory endpoint. A total of 493 women were randomized 2 : 1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease, there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and chemotherapy-free survival numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (intent-to-treat population: 13.1 months; subgroup with visceral disease: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2− ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached. • This phase III trial evaluated abemaciclib + NSAI versus placebo + NSAI as initial therapy for HR+, HER2− ABC. • Addition of abemaciclib to an NSAI resulted in numerically longer OS; however, statistical significance was not reached. • Absolute improvement in median OS was clinically meaningful (ITT: 13.1 months; sVD: 14.9 months). • The previously demonstrated PFS benefit with the addition of abemaciclib was sustained (median improvement 14.3 months). • The addition of abemaciclib delayed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy (median improvement 16.1 months). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This investigation aims to elucidate the treatment status of advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients in Hunan Province of Central Southern China from November 2021 to December 2022. Methods: Data from 301 patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer were collected from the breast cancer investigation project in Hunan under the guidance of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncolfogy (CSCO). The data included the clinical characteristics of patients and the status of first-line and second-line rescue treatment. Results: First-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 40% (121/301) and 60% (180/301) of treatments, respectively. AI (21%), AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (28%), and fulvestrant (24%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (18%) were the most common first-line endocrine therapies. Taxane-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line chemotherapy (59%). Second-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 43% (72/166) and 57% (94/166) of treatments, respectively. Fulvestrant (23%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (29%) were the most common second-line endocrine therapies. The prevalences of AI and AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor decreased to 19% and 11%, respectively. T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Third-line chemotherapy was more prevalent than endocrine therapy (57% vs. 41%). T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor was the most common endocrine therapy (33%). AI, AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, and fulvestrant accounted for 21%, 12% and 18% of third-line endocrine therapies, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy was a more favorable choice for first-line and second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients in Hunan Province. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line therapy with palbociclib in a Spanish cohort treated after palbociclib approval. Methods: PALBOSPAIN is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study evaluating real-world patterns and outcomes with 1 L palbociclib in men and women (any menopausal status) with advanced HR+/HER2– BC diagnosed between November 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rw-PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), the real-world response rate (rw-RR), the clinical benefit rate, palbociclib dose reduction, and safety. Results: A total of 762 patients were included. The median rw-PFS and OS were 24 months (95% CI 21–27) and 42 months (40-not estimable [NE]) in the whole population, respectively. By cohort, the median rw-PFS and OS were as follows: 28 (95% CI 23–39) and 44 (95% CI 38-NE) months in patients with de novo metastatic disease, 13 (95% CI 11–17) and 36 months (95% CI 31–41) in patients who experienced relapse < 12 months after the end of ET, and 31 months (95% CI 26–37) and not reached (NR) in patients who experienced relapse > 12 months after the end of ET. rw-PFS and OS were longer in patients with oligometastasis and only one metastatic site and those with non-visceral disease. The most frequent hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (72%; grade ≥ 3: 52.5%), and the most common non-hematologic adverse event was asthenia (38%). Conclusion: These findings, consistent with those from clinical trials, support use of palbociclib plus ET as 1 L for advanced BC in the real-world setting, including pre-menopausal women and men. Trial registration number: NCT04874025 (PALBOSPAIN). Date of registration: 04/30/2021 retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The use of locoregional radiotherapy (RT) in patients with advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer remains a topic of ongoing debate. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of locoregional RT in advanced breast cancer patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in a first-line setting. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer between 2018 and 2023 who received treatment with CDK4/6i and underwent locoregional radiotherapy. Results. Among the 371 patients treated with CDK4/6i as part of their first-line therapy, 23 received locoregional RT either concurrently or sequentially with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Disease progression within the breast occurred in 19 patients (5.1%). Among these cases, five patients had previously undergone breast RT (5/23, 21.7%), while 14 did not (14/348, 4.0%, p = 0.004). All cases of local progression after RT followed palliative doses and were accompanied by early systemic progression. The 2-year PFS in the entire cohort of patients treated with locoregional RT was 65.7% (95% CI: 40.5–82.3%). Notably, patients who received higher RT doses had longer 2-year PFS (83.3%, 95% CI: 27.3–97.5%) than those with palliative RT doses (59.3%, 95% CI: 30.7–79.3%); however, the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.58). Furthermore, the 2-year local control in the entire cohort with locoregional RT was 73.0% (95% CI: 46.5–87.9%). Importantly, no local progression was observed after RT when using high doses. Conclusions. The addition of locoregional radiotherapy to first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors warrants further investigation across various clinical scenarios in advanced breast cancer. Palliative radiation regimens delivered early in breast oligoprogression may not always suffice, emphasizing the need for comprehensive studies in this context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BRAWO, a real‐world study, assessed the efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and safety of EVE + EXE in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC) in routine clinical practice. Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2‐ABC with recurrence or progression after a NSAI were included. Primary Observation parameters included the evaluation of the effectiveness of EVE + EXE. A multivariate‐analysis using Cox proportional hazard model was built to identify predictors of progression. Overall, 2100 patients were enrolled (August 2012–December 2017); 2074 were evaluable for efficacy and safety analyses. Majority of patients (60.6%) received EVE + EXE as first (28.7%) or second‐line (31.9%) therapy. Visceral metastases were present in 54.1% patients. Median progression‐free survival (mPFS) reported as 6.6 months (95%CI: 6.3–7.0). Multivariate‐analysis in a subset of patients (n = 1837) found higher body mass index (BMI) and non‐visceral metastases to be independent predictors of favorable PFS. Patients with a BMI of 20 to <25 had a mPFS of 6.0 (95%CI: 5.4–6.4) and those with a BMI ≥30 had mPFS of 8.5 (95%CI: 6.9–9.9). 41.2% patients achieved stable disease and 7.3% partial response. No major changes were observed QoL; 86.4% patients received stomatitis prophylaxis and 41.4% experienced EVE related AEs of stomatitis, mainly low grade. AEs occurred in 91.2% of patients, of which stomatitis (42.6%) and fatigue (19.8%) were most frequent. The BRAWO study provides real‐world evidence of efficacy and safety of EVE + EXE in patients with HR+, HER2− ABC. A high BMI and the absence of visceral metastases were independent predictors of PFS in this cohort of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A recent large real-world study conducted in the United States reported the effectiveness of palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor in HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, local clinical practice and available medical treatment can vary between Japan and Western countries. Thus, it is important to investigate Japanese real-world data. This observational, multicenter study (NCT05399329) reports the interim analysis of effectiveness of palbociclib plus ET as first-line or second-line treatment for HR+/HER2− ABC by estimating real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) in Japanese routine clinical practice. Methods: Real-world clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of palbociclib plus ET were captured using a medical record review of patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2− ABC who had received palbociclib plus ET in the first-line or second-line treatment across 20 sites in Japan. The primary endpoint was rwPFS; secondary endpoints were OS, real-world overall response rate, real-world clinical benefit rate, and chemotherapy-free survival. Results: Of the 677 eligible patients, 420 and 257 patients, respectively, had received palbociclib with ET as first-line and second-line treatments. Median rwPFS (95% confidence interval) was 24.5 months (19.9–29.4) for first-line and 14.5 months (10.2–19.0) for second-line treatment groups. Median OS was not reached in the first-line group and was 46.7 months (38.8-not estimated) for the second-line group. The 36-month OS rates for de novo metastasis, treatment-free interval (TFI) ≥ 12 months, and TFI < 12 months were 80.2% (69.1–87.7), 82.0% (70.7–89.3), and 66.0% (57.9–72.9), respectively. Conclusion: The addition of palbociclib to ET was effective for treating HR+/HER2− ABC in Japanese routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the gold standard of the hormone receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative advanced breast cancer. However, optimal treatment after disease progression is a matter of debate. We aimed to assess predictive and prognostic factors associated with the treatment outcome following CDK4/6i progression. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who progressed on CDK4/6i treatment between 2018 and 2024. Treatment based on molecular findings (PIK3CA mutation), genetic findings (BRCA1/2 germline mutation), or adapted to the change in the tumor phenotype in rebiopsy (anti-HER2 therapy in the transformation to HER-2-positive disease) was grouped into tailored treatment and compared to the endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy alone. Results: Five hundred twelve patients were treated with CDK4/6i. Two hundred patients with disease progression were enrolled in the study. Duration of response to CDK4/6i was not predictive of the response to subsequent treatment, whereas the progression in the central nervous system was the worst prognostic factor. Thirty patients were ineligible for subsequent treatment. Survival after CDK4/6i progression was significantly longer in patients eligible for tailored treatment. The median PFS in patients with tailored treatment (n=19) was 13.5 months vs. 4.9 months in patients with non-tailored therapy (n=151; p=0.045). 12-month PFS was 54.1% with tailored treatment [95% CI 24.1–76.7%] compared to 18.5% with non-tailored therapy [95% CI 11.6– 26.6%]. The median OS for patients treated with a tailored approach was not reached compared to 11.5 months with non-tailored treatment (p=0.016). The 24-month OS for patients treated with a tailored approach was 80.2% [95% CI 40.3–94.8%] compared to 21.1% [95% CI 12.2–31.7%] for patients with nontailored treatment. Conclusions: Tailoring of subsequent treatment strategy seems to be essential for achieving long-term benefit. Further studies are required, as the prognosis after CDK4/6i progression remains dismal, especially in cases affecting the central nervous system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The outcomes for patients with advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancer have improved significantly over the last decade. Whereas treatment of endocrine-resistant disease was previously limited to conventional chemotherapy, we are now seeing increasing approvals for targeted agents suitable for combination with hormone therapies to potentially reverse the endocrine resistance for these patients in the early lines of treatment. The phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is frequently dysregulated in human cancers, and though many drugs targeting this pathway have been developed, a vast number of these compounds have failed in clinical trials, with both toxicity and resistance being major problems. In this article, we summarise the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, review the mechanisms of resistance to agents that target this pathway, and discuss future potential strategies to overcome this resistance. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway is one of the most frequently activated pathways in breast cancer and also plays a central role in the regulation of several physiologic functions. There are major efforts ongoing to exploit precision medicine by developing inhibitors that target the three kinases (PI3K, AKT, and mTOR). Although multiple compounds have been developed, at present, there are just three inhibitors approved to target this pathway in patients with advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: everolimus (mTOR inhibitor), alpelisib (PIK3CA inhibitor), and capivasertib (AKT inhibitor). Like most targeted cancer drugs, resistance poses a major problem in the clinical setting and is a factor that has frequently limited the overall efficacy of these agents. Drug resistance can be categorised into intrinsic or acquired resistance depending on the timeframe it has developed within. Whereas intrinsic resistance exists prior to a specific treatment, acquired resistance is induced by a therapy. The majority of patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer will likely be offered an inhibitor of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway at some point in their cancer journey, with the options available depending on the approval criteria in place and the cancer's mutation status. Within this large cohort of patients, it is likely that most will develop resistance at some point, which makes this an area of interest and an unmet need at present. Herein, we review the common mechanisms of resistance to agents that target the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, elaborate on current management approaches, and discuss ongoing clinical trials attempting to mitigate this significant issue. We highlight the need for additional studies into AKT1 inhibitor resistance in particular. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of olaparib plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and germinal BRCA mutations (gBRCAm). Methods: OPHELIA (NCT03931551) was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HER2-positive ABC with germinal deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had received at least one prior systemic regimen for advanced disease were enrolled. Patients received olaparib plus trastuzumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical benefit rate for at least 24 weeks as per RECIST v.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and safety profile. Results: A total of 68 pre-treated HER2-positive ABC patients were screened. Due to slow accrual the trial was stopped after enrolling 5 patients instead of the planned sample size of 20. Four patients achieved clinical benefit (80.0 %, 95 % CI; 28.4–99.5, p

Aim: To evaluate the impact of palbociclib treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- aBC) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in both the clinical and real-world setting. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify clinical trials and real-world evidence studies up to June 2023 that reported HRQoL outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC or mBC treated with Palbociclib. Results: 15 unique studies reported across 35 records were identified. Of these, seven were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three were single-arm clinical trials and five were real-world evidence (RWE) studies. HRQoL was generally found to be maintained in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC or mBC across RCTs, single-arm clinical trials and RWE studies. HRQoL measures across instruments, study types and line of therapy, were largely reported to be at least maintained if not improved from baseline among patients treated with palbociclib and were observed to be comparable or better in the palbociclib group versus monotherapy control arm in RCTs. Similar results were seen for treatment related outcomes (e.g., sexual functioning, upset by hair loss, systemic therapy side effects etc.), and important individual patient outcomes, including pain, fatigue and physical functioning. Findings were also consistent across key clinical characteristics (visceral metastases, neutropenia), as well as patient populations often underrepresented in clinical trials (Asian patients, older adults). Conclusion: Overall, current evidence suggests that HRQoL is largely preserved with the addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC or mBC across study types and populations.

Shuling Wang,1,2,&ast; Yuqin Chen,1– 3,&ast; Weidong Li,2,4,&ast; Chunfang Hao,1,2 Li Zhang,1,2 Weipeng Zhao,1,2 Yehui Shi,1,2 Zhongsheng Tong1,2 1Department of Breast Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 2Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Respiratory Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Breast Cancer Pathology and Research Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yehui Shi; Zhongsheng Tong, Email shiyehui@tjmuch.com; tongzhongsheng_on@163.comBackground: The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of serum HER2 (sHER2) in patients with advanced breast cancer.Methods: We analyzed the sHER2 levels of 200 patients with advanced breast cancer receiving first or second line treatment, the tissue HER2 (tHER2) level was also analyzed. Indicators of therapeutic efficacy and prognosis were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and time to progression (TTP).Results: The baseline sHER2 level was high in 132 patients and low in 68 patients. The high level of sHER2 is correlated with molecular subtype (p=0.016), visceral metastasis (p< 0.001), liver metastasis (p< 0.001), tissue HER-2 (tHER2) (p=0.001), and, among tHER2-low tumors (59 patients), the baseline sHER2 high level was associated with a higher proportion of brain metastasis. The ORR of patients with baseline sHER2 high level is higher than those with baseline sHER2 low level (p=0.026). The TTP of patients with baseline sHER2 low level is longer than the patients with baseline sHER2 high level (p=0.024). For patients with baseline sHER2 high level, a significant decrease in sHER2 after two cycles of treatment indicates higher ORR, DCR, and an extension of TTP. After multiple cycles of treatment, for patients with tHER-2 positive and baseline sHER2 high level, the DCR in the sHER2 decrease in the negative group was higher than that in the continuous positive group (p=0.037). Patients with a rapid decline type of sHER2 dynamic change curve had higher ORR and prolonged TTP compared with patients with other types of sHER2 dynamic change curve. There is no correlation between OS and sHER2 levels.Conclusion: Our study showed that patients with advanced breast cancer had a high level of sHER2 at recurrence, regardless of whether they are tHER2 positive or negative. Dynamic detection of sHER2 can help predict therapeutic efficacy and prognosis, regardless of whether tHER-2 is positive or negative.Keywords: serum HER2, advanced breast cancer, clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, prognosis

Background. The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy is a key initial treatment for advanced luminal HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The approval studies MONALEESA-2 and 7 demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ribociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors as a first-line treatment in post- and premenopausal patients. In the Phase lllb CompLEEment-1 study, the same treatment regimen was evaluated in an extended patient population in terms of both safety and efficacy. The article presents an analysis of data from a subgroup of patients from Russia. Materials and methods. The study included 129 patients from Russia who met the inclusion criteria for the CompLEEment-1 study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) at a median follow-up of 25.4 months. Secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival, objective response rate, and disease control. Results. The efficacy and safety results of the therapy in the subgroup of patients from Russia were consistent with the general population of patients included in CompLEEment-1. The incidence of AEs requiring dose adjustment or treatment interruption was 58.1%, and the permanent discontinuation rate was 15.5%. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs grade 3 or higher were neutropenia and transaminase increased. Conclusion Data obtained in a subgroup of patients from the Russian Federation confirm the safety and tolerability of ribociclib in an extended population of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer in settings close to the real world.

Abstract Background As an oncologic emergency related to abnormalities in calcium metabolism, hypercalcemia associated with paraneoplastic syndrome and bone metastases is well known. Meanwhile, the incidence of hypocalcemia is low, except in cases associated with bone-modifying agents used for bone metastases. Hypocalcemia induced by bone-modifying agents typically occurs early after the initial administration, and its incidence can be significantly reduced by preventive administration of calcium and vitamin D3 supplements. Case report We report two cases of recurrent severe hypocalcemia occurring during chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with multiple bone metastases. Case 1: A 35-year-old Japanese woman developed metastases in the bone, liver, and ovaries during postoperative endocrine therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. She underwent chemotherapy and treatment with denosumab. She experienced recurrent episodes of severe hypocalcemia subsequent to a change in the chemotherapy regimen. Case 2: A 65-year-old Japanese woman encountered multiple bone metastases after postoperative anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy and during endocrine therapy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. She underwent anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy and treatment with denosumab. She experienced recurrent severe hypocalcemia subsequent to a change in the chemotherapy regimen to letrozole + lapatinib, trastuzumab emtansine, and lapatinib + capecitabine. Conclusions We observed two cases of recurrent severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases after modifications to their therapy regimens. These cases differed from the typical hypocalcemia induced by bone-modifying agents. It is possible that antitumor drugs affect calcium and bone metabolism associated with bone metastases. While these cases are rare, it is crucial for oncologists to be aware of hypocalcemia not only at the initiation of bone-modifying agents but also throughout the entire antitumor therapy, as hypocalcemia can lead to fatal outcomes.

Abstract Background Noninvasive biomarkers for the assessment of response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (BCa) are essential for optimized therapeutic decision-making. We evaluated the potential of soluble Periostin (POSTN) in circulation as a novel biomarker for chemotherapy efficacy monitoring. Methods Two hundred and thirty-one patients with different stages of BCa were included. Of those patients, 58 patients with inoperable metastatic disease receiving HER2-targeted or non-targeted chemotherapy were enrolled to assess the performances of markers in recapitulating the chemotherapy efficacy assessed by imaging. POSTN, together with CA153 or CEA at different time points (C0, C2, and C4) were determined. Results POSTN levels were significantly associated with tumor volume (P

Abstract Purpose The pathways underpinning suicide ideation (SI) and certain physical and psychological factors in patients with advanced breast cancer remain unclear. This study develops and validates a mediation model that delineates the associations between several multidimensional variables and SI in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods Patients with advanced breast cancer (n = 509) were recruited as study participants from 10 regional cancer centers across China from August 2019 to December 2020. Participants were required to complete five questionnaires using an electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) system: 9 item- Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). Risk factors for SI were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and inputted into serial multiple mediation models to elucidate the pathways linking the risk factors to SI. Results SI prevalence was 22.8% (116/509). After adjusting for covariates, depression (odds ratio [OR] = 1.384), emotional distress (OR = 1.107), upset (OR = 0.842), and forgetfulness (OR = 1.236) were identified as significant independent risk factors (all p

ABSTRACTBackground: Monotherapy with aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant were the standard-of-care for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-type2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer, before integration of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Effectiveness data is essential for regulatory action, but little is known about real-world use of aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted resorting to data from a cancer registry to identify adult women with HR+/HER- advanced breast cancer exposed to aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant (31 May 2017–31 March 2019) at the main oncology hospital in Portugal. Cases were updated with follow-up until death or cut-off (31 March 2021) and pseudoanonymized data extracted. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary time to treatment failure (TTF), estimated using survival analysis and compared with published trials.Results: 192 patients were distributed by subgroups according to the medicine. Letrozole: OS 30.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.6–41.4); TTF 11.2 (95%CI 8.7–13.7). Exemestane: OS 22.1 (95%CI 9.7–34.6); TTF 6.0 (95%CI 4.1–7.8). Fulvestrant: OS 21.6 (95%CI 16.5–26.7); TTF 5.6 (95%CI 4.5–6.6).Conclusions: Estimated effectiveness (OS) of letrozole and fulvestrant was, respectively, 3.2–3.5 months lower than reported. The clinical meaning seems uncertain and may be explained a higher proportion of worse prognostic characteristics in patients treated in the real-world.

BackgroundPrevious analyses from the PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies showed that palbociclib (PAL) plus endocrine therapy (ET) prolongs time to first subsequent chemotherapy (TTC) versus placebo (PBO) plus ET in the overall population of patients with hormone receptor‒positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here, we evaluated TTC in relevant patient subgroups.MethodsThese post hoc analyses evaluated TTC by subgroup using data from 2 randomized, phase 3 studies of women with HR+/HER2- ABC. In PALOMA-2, postmenopausal patients previously untreated for ABC were randomized 2:1 to receive PAL (125 mg/day, 3/1-week schedule) plus letrozole (LET; 2.5 mg/day; n = 444) or PBO plus LET (n = 222). In PALOMA-3, premenopausal or postmenopausal patients whose disease had progressed after prior ET were randomized 2:1 to receive PAL (125 mg/day, 3/1-week schedule) plus fulvestrant (FUL; 500 mg; n = 347) or PBO plus FUL (n = 174).ResultsFirst subsequent chemotherapy was received by 35.5% and 56.2% in PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 after progression on palbociclib plus ET or placebo plus ET. Across all subgroups analyzed, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the PAL plus ET arm than the PBO plus ET arm. TTC was longer with PAL plus ET versus PBO plus ET across the same patient subgroups in both studies.ConclusionsAcross all subgroups, PAL plus ET versus PBO plus ET had longer median PFS and resulted in prolonged TTC in both the PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies. Pfizer Inc (NCT01740427, NCT01942135).

Introduction: Patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer have multiple therapeutic options. However, most are not studied in the renal replacement therapy (RRT) setting. Case report: We report the use of Phesgo® (subcutaneous fixed-dose combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab) combined with exemestane as a first-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in a hemodialysis patient with multiple comorbidities. Partial response was attained, with disease progression after 8 months without evidence of significant toxicity. Discussions: This case report is, to our knowledge, the first published case documenting the use of Phesgo® in a hemodialysis patient. No new safety signs were seen, and activity was documented, adding support to the use of this drug combination in such a patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This position paper aims to address specific clinical questions regarding the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in elderly patients with early or advanced breast cancer. Its objectives are to delineate the current state of knowledge regarding the efficacy of these treatments in the elderly population and their tolerance profile, including the impact on quality of life, with a particular focus on the frailest subgroups, and to attempt to define the optimal treatment strategy for elderly and fragile patients (dosage and therapeutic sequence). Background: Breast cancer (BC) incidence increases with age, particularly in HR-positive/HER2-negative subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6is) alongside endocrine therapy (ET) have emerged as promising treatments for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced and early BC. However, their efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) in older and frail patients remain underexplored. Methods: This position paper assesses the existing literature from 2015 to 2024, focusing on CDK4/6is use in patients aged 65 years and older with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC. Results: Our analysis methodically addresses critical questions regarding the utilization of CDK4/6is in the elderly BC patient population, organizing findings from the metastatic and adjuvant settings. In the metastatic setting, CDK4/6is significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS), paralleling benefits observed in younger patients, and suggest potential overall survival (OS) benefits, warranting further investigation. Despite an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), such as neutropenia and asthenia, CDK4/6is present a markedly lower toxicity profile compared to traditional chemotherapy, with manageable side effects. QoL analysis indicates that integrating CDK4/6is into treatment regimens does not significantly impact elderly BC patients' daily life and symptom management. Special attention is given to frail subgroups, and personalized approaches are recommended to balance efficacy and adverse effects, such as starting with ET alone and introducing CDK4/6is upon progression in patients with a low disease burden. Transitioning to the adjuvant setting, early results, particularly with abemaciclib, indicate positive effects on disease-free survival (DFS), emphasizing the need for continued analysis to validate these findings and assess long-term implications. However, data on older patients are insufficient to conclude whether they truly benefit from this treatment. Conclusion: Overall, CDK4/6is present a favorable benefit-risk profile in older BC patients, at least in advanced BC; however, further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies and improve outcomes in this population [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This prospective real‐world study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of eribulin in the clinical practice against advanced breast cancer (ABC) in China. Patients and Methods: In this study, eligible patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had experienced prior neo−/adjuvant or failed the palliative treatment with anthracycline/taxanes were included. Eribulin (1.4 mg/m2) was infused intravenously on Day 1 and Day 8 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. The progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety of the treatment were assessed. Results: One hundred and thirty‐four patients were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 4.3 months (95% CI: 0.3–15.4). The ORR and DCR was 32.1% and 79.1%, respectively. The mPFS of patients who received eribulin as first‐ or second‐line treatment was significantly better than those who received eribulin as ≥3‐line treatment (6.9 months [95% CI: 3.2–8.8] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.4–4.6], p = 0.006). The mPFS of patients with triple‐negative, HER2‐positive, and HER2(−)/HR(+) was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.7–4.1), 6.2 (95% CI: 2.3–10.1) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.1–5.9), respectively. HER2(+) patients had significantly longer PFS than TNBC patients (p = 0.022). Patients received combination therapy had a significantly longer mPFS than those who received eribulin monotherapy (5.0 months [95% CI 3.6–6.3] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI: 3.3–4.7] [p = 0.016]). Multivariate analysis revealed that MBC patients with a molecular typing of non‐TNBC receiving eribulin as ≤2‐line therapy and combination therapy had a low risk of disease progression. Neutropenia (33.58%), leukopenia (11.94%), and thrombocytopenia (4.48%) were the most common treatment‐related adverse events. Conclusion: Eribulin demonstrated effective clinical activity and a favorable tolerability profile in Chinese patients with ABC in the real‐world. The efficacy and safety profile were consistent with those reported in previous randomized phase 3 trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In patients with first-line advanced breast cancer (ABC), the correlation between ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) and tumor disease burden, and its prognostic value remains poorly investigated. Methods: This study included patients with ABC diagnosed at Peking University Cancer Hospital who performed ctDNA test before receiving first-line treatment. Baseline plasma samples were collected for assessing ctDNA alterations and VAF with next-generation sequencing. The sum of tumor target lesion diameters (SLD) was measured with imaging methods according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: The final cohort included 184 patients. The median age of the cohort was 49.4 (IQR: 42.3–56.8) years. The median VAF was 15.6% (IQR: 5.4%-33.7%). VAF showed positive correlation with SLD in patients with relatively large tumor lesions (r = 0.314, p = 0.003), but not in patients with small tumor lesions (p = 0.226). VAF was associated with multiple metastasis sites (p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high VAF was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (HR: 3.519, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.149–5.761), and first-line progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 2.352, 95%CI: 1.462–3.782). Combined VAF and SLD improved prediction performance, both median OS and PFS of patients in VAF(H)/SLD(H) group were significantly longer than VAF(L)/SLD(L) group (mOS: 49.3 vs. 174.1 months; mPFS: 9.6 vs. 25.3 months). Conclusion: ctDNA VAF associated with tumor disease burden, and was a prognostic factor for patients with ABC. A combination of ctDNA test and radiographic imaging might enhance tumor burden evaluation, and improve prognosis stratification in patients with ABC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the association between vitamin D deficiency and advanced BC in a Malian women population. Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study, conducted during 4 months, from August 2021 to November 2021. The assays were performed on immunodiagnostic and biochemistry devices in Rodolphe Merieux Laboratory. Results: We included 77 women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. The mean age of the study population was 48.51 ± 13.02 years. The mean plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D were 20.65 ± 6.76 ng/ml and 18.89 ± 6.12 ng/ml (p=0.274) in groups III and IV, respectively. Stage III was predominant, comprising 67.5% of the cases, and there were no significant differences between stages III and IV regarding phospho-calcium biological markers. Our results showed a greater deficiency in vitamin D at stage III compared to stage IV, with p=0.782. The logistic regression model demonstrated a significant decrease in the relative risk of advanced breast cancer across the quartiles of vitamin D (p=0.039). There was no association with serum calcium, phosphate, plasma creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p>0.05). Conclusions: Our findings show an decrease of the risk of breast cancer about vitamin D levels in our population. These results suggest an association between vitamin D and the risk of advanced breast cancer. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanism of vitamin D deficiency in advanced breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As an oncologic emergency related to abnormalities in calcium metabolism, hypercalcemia associated with paraneoplastic syndrome and bone metastases is well known. Meanwhile, the incidence of hypocalcemia is low, except in cases associated with bone-modifying agents used for bone metastases. Hypocalcemia induced by bone-modifying agents typically occurs early after the initial administration, and its incidence can be significantly reduced by preventive administration of calcium and vitamin D3 supplements. Case report: We report two cases of recurrent severe hypocalcemia occurring during chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with multiple bone metastases. Case 1: A 35-year-old Japanese woman developed metastases in the bone, liver, and ovaries during postoperative endocrine therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. She underwent chemotherapy and treatment with denosumab. She experienced recurrent episodes of severe hypocalcemia subsequent to a change in the chemotherapy regimen. Case 2: A 65-year-old Japanese woman encountered multiple bone metastases after postoperative anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy and during endocrine therapy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. She underwent anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy and treatment with denosumab. She experienced recurrent severe hypocalcemia subsequent to a change in the chemotherapy regimen to letrozole + lapatinib, trastuzumab emtansine, and lapatinib + capecitabine. Conclusions: We observed two cases of recurrent severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases after modifications to their therapy regimens. These cases differed from the typical hypocalcemia induced by bone-modifying agents. It is possible that antitumor drugs affect calcium and bone metabolism associated with bone metastases. While these cases are rare, it is crucial for oncologists to be aware of hypocalcemia not only at the initiation of bone-modifying agents but also throughout the entire antitumor therapy, as hypocalcemia can lead to fatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Noninvasive biomarkers for the assessment of response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (BCa) are essential for optimized therapeutic decision-making. We evaluated the potential of soluble Periostin (POSTN) in circulation as a novel biomarker for chemotherapy efficacy monitoring. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one patients with different stages of BCa were included. Of those patients, 58 patients with inoperable metastatic disease receiving HER2-targeted or non-targeted chemotherapy were enrolled to assess the performances of markers in recapitulating the chemotherapy efficacy assessed by imaging. POSTN, together with CA153 or CEA at different time points (C0, C2, and C4) were determined. Results: POSTN levels were significantly associated with tumor volume (P < 0.0001) and TNM stages (P < 0.0001) of BCa. For early monitoring, dynamics of POSTN could recapitulate the chemotherapy efficacy among all molecular subtypes (Cohen's weighted kappa = 0.638, P < 0.0001), much better than that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 153 (CA15-3). For early partial response, superior performance of POSTN was observed (Cohen's weighted kappa = 0.827, P < 0.0001) in cases with baseline levels above 17.19 ng/mL. For long-term monitoring, the POSTN response was observed to be strongly consistent with the course of the disease. Moreover, progression free survival analysis showed that patients experienced a significant early decrease of POSTN tended to obtain more benefits from the treatments. Conclusions: The current study suggests that soluble POSTN is an informative serum biomarker to complement the current clinical approaches for early and long-term chemotherapy efficacy monitoring in advanced BCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The pathways underpinning suicide ideation (SI) and certain physical and psychological factors in patients with advanced breast cancer remain unclear. This study develops and validates a mediation model that delineates the associations between several multidimensional variables and SI in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods: Patients with advanced breast cancer (n = 509) were recruited as study participants from 10 regional cancer centers across China from August 2019 to December 2020. Participants were required to complete five questionnaires using an electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) system: 9 item- Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). Risk factors for SI were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and inputted into serial multiple mediation models to elucidate the pathways linking the risk factors to SI. Results: SI prevalence was 22.8% (116/509). After adjusting for covariates, depression (odds ratio [OR] = 1.384), emotional distress (OR = 1.107), upset (OR = 0.842), and forgetfulness (OR = 1.236) were identified as significant independent risk factors (all p < 0.05). The ORs indicate that depression and distress have the strongest associations with SI. Health status has a significant indirect effect (OR=-0.044, p = 0.005) and a strong total effect (OR=-0.485, p < 0.001) on SI, mediated by insomnia severity and emotional distress. Conclusions: There is a high SI prevalence among Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer. Our analysis revealed predictive pathways from poor health to heightened SI, mediated by emotional distress and insomnia. Regular management of distress and insomnia can decrease suicide risk in this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last two decades, the use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in medical oncology has increased the likelihood of identifying druggable mutations that may be potentially susceptible to targeted treatments. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) currently does not recommend the use of the NGS test to determine the therapeutic course of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in daily clinical practice. However, the aim of this work is to evaluate the potential contribution of the NGS test in selecting targeted therapies for patients with mBC. Data were retrospectively collected from 101 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and treated at the Modena Cancer Center between January 2015 and April 2022. A NGS test was performed on the tumor tissue of each patient at the Laboratory of Molecular Pathology of the University Hospital of Modena. This study analyzed the clinical–pathological characteristics and mutational profile of the population using NGS tests, with a focus on actionable mutations that could be targeted in advanced stages of clinical development. The indicator of this study was to quantify the actionable mutations that resulted in a change of cancer treatment. In total, 101 patients with metastatic breast cancer were analyzed, including 86 with luminal phenotype, 10 who were HER2-positive and 5 who were triple-negative. Median age was 52 years. NGS analysis was conducted on 47 samples of primary breast cancer, 52 on metastatic sites of disease and 2 on liquid biopsies. A total of 85 gene mutations were found. The most common mutations were identified in the PIK3CA (47%), FGFR (19%) and ERBB2 genes (12%), and to a lesser extent in other genes. Of the 61 patients with pathogenic mutations, 46 (75%) had at least one actionable mutation. Of these, nine received treatment with a molecular target drug: eight patients with a mutation of the PIK3CA gene were treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant; one patient with FGFR1/2 amplifications received TAS120. Median PFS for these patients was 3.8 months. The study results show that using the NGS test on cancer tissue of metastatic breast cancer could influence the therapeutic choices, considering the small sample size and limited follow-up. About 9% of the study population had their therapy modified based on the results of NGS. The growing number of detectable mutations and increased accessibility of the test may lead to a greater number of potential therapeutic implications for the NGS assay. Perspectives suggest that NGS analysis can be implemented in daily clinical practice, particularly in contexts where a Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) is active. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer cases are among the most aggressive breast tumor subtypes. Accurately assessing HER2 expression status is vital to determining whether patients will benefit from targeted anti-HER2 treatment. HER2-targeted positron emission tomography (PET/CT) is noninvasive, enabling the real-time evaluation of breast cancer patient HER2 status with accuracy. Methods: We summarize the research progress of PET/CT targeting HER2 in breast cancer, focusing on PET/CT molecular probes targeting HER2 and their clinical application in the management of advanced breast cancer. Results: At present, a variety of different HER2 targeted molecular probes for PET/CT imaging have been developed, including nucleolin-labeled antibodies, antibody fragments, nanobodies, and peptides of various affinities, among others. HER2-targeted PET/CT can relatively accurately evaluate HER2 expression status in advanced breast cancer patients. It has good performance in the early detection of small HER2-positive lesions, evaluation of HER2 status in lesions that cannot be readily biopsied, evaluation of the heterogeneity of multiple metastases, identification of lesions with altered HER2 status, and evaluation of the efficacy of anti-HER2 drugs. Conclusion: HER2-targeted PET/CT offers a promising noninvasive approach for real-time assessment of HER2 status，which can be guide targeted treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Future prospective clinical studies will be invaluable for fully evaluating the importance of HER2-targeted molecular imaging in the management of breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We investigated the relationship between the group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s)‐myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) axis and obesity‐related breast cancer. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients with breast cancer who had first relapse and metastasis between January 2019 and August 2021 were enrolled. The proportions of ILC2s and MDSCs in blood and the levels of cytokines in serum were detected with flow cytometry. Correlation analysis among clinical characteristics (such as body mass index [BMI]), cytokines, ILC2s, and MDSCs was conducted. Results: There was a significant difference in the proportions of ILC2s and MDSCs between the high BMI group and the normal BMI group (p <.05). In the triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, the proportions of ILC2s and MDSCs in the obese group were significantly higher than those in the nonobese group (p <.05). In all breast cancer patients, there was a positive correlation between BMI and the ILC2s‐MDSCs axis (p <.05). However, there was no correlation observed between the number of metastases, progression‐free survival, and the ILC2s‐MDSCs axis (p >.05). Additionally, ILC2s showed positive correlations with MDSCs, interleukin‐5 (IL‐5), IL‐10, IL‐17A, (PD‐L1), programmed cell death 2 ligand 2 (PD‐L2), and molecular typing (p <.05). Similarly, MDSCs exhibited positive correlations with IL‐5, IL‐8, IL‐9, IL‐17A, PD‐L1, and PD‐L2 (p <.05). In patients with TNBC, there was a positive correlation between BMI and IL‐5 (p <.05). Conclusion: Conclusively, obesity may enhance the immunosuppressive effect of the ILC2‐MDSC axis in advanced breast cancer. IL‐5 may play a vital role in the ILC2‐MDSC axis and obesity in TNBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]