Search

Purpose Patients with breast cancer (BC) face complex medical information and decisions. The Outcomes4Me mobile app provides evidence-based BC education, symptom management tracking and clinical trial matching. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of introducing this app into routine BC care. Methods In this pilot study among BC patients undergoing therapy at an academic cancer center, patients were followed for 12 weeks with survey administration and electronic health record (EHR) abstraction at baseline and completion. Feasibility was defined as 40% of patients engaging with the app 3 or more times during the study. Additional endpoints included app usability (system usability scale), patient care experience, symptom evaluation, and clinical trial matching. Results The study enrolled 107 patients from 6/01/2020 to 3/31/2021. Utilization of the app was deemed feasible with 60% of patients engaging with the app at least 3 times. SUS score of 70 indicated above average usability. New diagnosis and higher education level was associated with greater app engagement, with usability similar across all age groups. 41% of patients found the app helped track symptoms. Cognitive and sexual symptoms were infrequently reported, but were more frequently captured in the app than in the EHR. After using the app, 33% of patients reported increased interest in clinical trial enrollment. Conclusion Introducing the Outcomes4Me patient navigation app into routine BC care is feasible and may improve the patient experience. These results support further evaluation of this mobile technology platform to improve BC education, symptom management, and decision making. Clinical trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov registration #: NCT04262518

Background: HR+/HER2– mBC, the most common subset of breast cancer, is treated with sequential endocrine therapy + targeted agents followed by sequential single-agent chemotherapy (CT), with increasingly shorter benefit duration with each subsequent treatment. High Trop-2 expression is observed in breast cancer regardless of subtype. SG is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study, SG showed both significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (HR, 0.66; P10- 0. Of Trop-2-evaluable pts, 192 (42%) and 270 (58%) had H-scores 10- Table Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Frederik Marmé, Javier Cortés, Peter Schmid, Delphine Loirat, Olivier Trédan, Eva Ciruelos, Florence Dalenc, Patricia Gómez Pardo, Komal Jhaveri, Monica Motwani, Oh Kyu Yoon, Hao Wang, Wendy Verret, Sara Tolaney. Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice (TPC): Efficacy by Trop-2 Expression in the TROPiCS-02 Study of Patients (Pts) With HR+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-11.

Background: For HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, after resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), treatment options are mostly limited to traditional chemotherapies (CT) that offer poor survival and quality of life (QoL), creating an area of unmet need. The antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan (SG) comprises an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a hydrolyzable linker. In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial, heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory HR+/HER2- MBC received SG vs single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). The study met its primary endpoint of improved progression-free survival with SG vs TPC. Here, we report the effect of SG vs TPC on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from TROPiCS-02. Patients and Methods: Patients who had received ≥1 CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ≥1 ET, and 2-4 prior lines of CT were randomized to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenous on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). In the PRO-evaluable population (all randomized patients with an evaluable assessment at baseline (BL) and ≥1 post-BL visit) SG and TPC were compared regarding time to first clinically meaningful worsening (TTD) or death from BL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (≥10 points), EQ-5D-5L health utility index (≥0.08 points), and EQ-VAS (≥7 points). For the EORTC QLQ-C30 function and global health status/QoL domains, patients with a BL score ≥10 and for symptom scales, patients with a BL score ≤90 were included. In the safety population (all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug), SG and TPC were compared regarding worst level of toxicities during treatment for the PRO-CTCAE items. For TTD, a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted and the PRO-CTCAE items were summarized descriptively (numbers and percentages). Results: Of 543 randomized patients, 446 (82%), 445 (82%), and 517 (95%) were included in the PRO-evaluable population (EORTC QLQ-C30: SG vs TPC n=236 vs 210 and EQ-5D-5L: n=238 vs 207) and in the safety population for PRO-CTCAE (SG vs TPC n=268 vs 249), respectively. TTD of EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, and financial difficulties and EQ-VAS were significantly longer in the SG vs the TPC arm (Table). TTD of EORTC QLQ-C30 diarrhea was significantly shorter for SG vs TPC. For PRO-CTCAE items, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and fatigue were similar between SG and TPC arms, whereas frequency of diarrhea and amount of hair loss were higher in the SG vs TPC arm. Conclusions: In this trial, SG significantly delayed worsening of overall QoL, physical and emotional functioning, and symptoms like fatigue, dyspnea, and insomnia. Overall, our findings suggest that SG has more favorable effects on PROs compared with TPC in pts with HR+/HER2- MBC. Table: Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration PRO Scores Citation Format: Frederik Marmé, Aditya Bardia, Hope Rugo, Peter Schmid, Sara M. Tolaney, Mafalda Oliveira, Andreas Schneeweiss, Ling Shi, Wendy Verret, Mahdi Gharaibeh, Anju Shah, Javier Cortés. Effect of sacituzumab govitecan vs chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the TROPiCS-02 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-65.

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) provide significant clinical benefit in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and have become a standard of care treatment. Prior insights from tumor profiling and preclinical analyses suggest that AKT1 activation can induce CDK4/6i resistance. We hypothesized that targeting AKT1 following CDK4/6i progression may be an effective therapeutic strategy and conducted a clinical trial to evaluate both doublet (ET+AKTi) and triplet (ET+AKTIi+CDK 4/6i) therapy in the ≥ 2nd line MBC setting. Methods: TAKTIC is an open-label phase Ib clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03959891) evaluating the combination of the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib (ipat) with fulvestrant (Arm A), an aromatase inhibitor (Arm B), or the triplet combination (Arm C) with fulvestrant + palbociclib (palbo). The primary objective is to evaluate the safety (NCI CTCAE 5.0) and tolerability of ipat in combination with endocrine therapy +/- CDK4/6i. Secondary objectives include clinical efficacy, as determined by objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Key inclusion criteria include unresectable HR+/HER2- MBC; at least 1 prior therapy for MBC including any CDK4/6i; up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC (no limit on prior endocrine therapy). Here, we present an updated interim analysis from all study arms. Results: The trial completed accrual with 77 pts enrolled from June 2019 – February 2022, including 19 on Arm A, 16 on Arm B, and 42 on Arm C. Median age was 62 (range 32-88) and 65/77 pts (84%) received prior CDK4/6i (median no. of prior lines = 3, range 1-13). 56/77 pts (73%) had measurable disease at baseline and 50/77 pts (65%) had visceral metastases in the liver/lung (68% Arm A, 44% Arm B, 71% Arm C). Pts enrolled on Arms A and B received ipat at 400mg in combination with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor, respectively. In Arm C, 27/42 pts enrolled into the dose escalation phase and received ipat + palbo at varying doses in combination with fulvestrant. Two DLTs were observed in the 300mg ipat + 125mg palbo cohort (grade 4 neutropenia ≥ 7 days). ET+400mg ipat + 100mg palbo was determined to be the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), and the remaining 15/42 pts on Arm C were treated at this dose level in the expansion phase. Treatment was well tolerated in all arms. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia (39/77, 50.6%), leukopenia (15/77, 19.5%), diarrhea (11/77, 14/3%), transaminitis (7/77, 9.1%), lymphopenia (6/77, 7.8%), rash (6/77, 7.8%), and thrombocytopenia (3/77, 3.9%). As of 6/28/2022, 16/77 pts remain on treatment. The median treatment duration for all pts is estimated at 6 months (range 0.5-39). Among the 56 pts with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (PR) and 32 had stable disease (SD) as the best response. CBR, defined as percentage of pts who achieved PR or SD > 6 months, was 48% across the study (53% Arm A, 31% Arm B, 57% Arm C). The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8 – 7.4) and the median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI: 17.1 – 33.9). Conclusions: The combination of ipat with endocrine therapy +/- palbo is well tolerated in heavily pre-treated pts, with preliminary evidence of clinical activity. This trial demonstrates how molecular insights related to CDK4/6i resistance inform potential therapy combinations. Further studies are needed to evaluate AKTi-based combinations in pts with HR+ MBC. Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Jennifer C. Keenan, Andrzej Niemierko, Dejan Juric, Laura M. Spring, Jeffrey Supko, Neelima Vidula, Steven J. Isakoff, Lianne Ryan, Sarah Padden, Elizabeth Fisher, Amber Newton, Beverly Moy, Leif Ellisen, Douglas S. Micalizzi, Aditya Bardia. PD13-07 Combination therapy with the AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, endocrine therapy, and a CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the phase I TAKTIC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-07.

Background: Breast cancer associated-chest wall disease (CWD) clinically behaves in an aggressive manner. However, little is known about the genomics of CWD. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can identify oncogenic mutations in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that the cfDNA genomics of CWD may vary from MBC cases without CWD. We compared the cfDNA genomics of patients with CWD to that of age and subtype matched MBC controls without CWD. Methods: Patients with MBC at an academic institution who underwent cfDNA testing (Guardant360, next generation sequencing (NGS), 74 gene assay) from 2/2016-2/2021 were identified. Patients with documented CWD (chest wall recurrence with nodules, ulceration, and/or skin metastases on imaging and/or examination) at the time of cfDNA testing (coinciding with MBC diagnosis) were included in the CWD cohort. Age and subtype matched MBC controls without CWD (CON) during the same time period with cfDNA results at MBC diagnosis were identified. A retrospective review was conducted to determine clinical features and cfDNA genomics of CWD and CON. A two-sample test of proportions was used to compare CWD to CON, with p< 0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Thirty-one patients with CWD and 63 CON were identified. Both groups were well-matched in median age at MBC diagnosis (CWD 57 vs. CON 59 years, p=0.93) and subtype distribution (CWD: TNBC 35%, HR+/HER2- 58%, HER2+ 6%; CON: TNBC 29%, HR+/HER2- 65%, HER2+ 6%, p=0.78). Patients also had similar racial distribution in both cohorts (p=0.57). Ninety percent (28/31) of CWD vs. 90% (57/63) of CON had ≥1 mutation detectable in cfDNA (p=0.62). Median number of cfDNA mutations for CWD was 4.5 (range 0-16) vs. 4 (range 0-21) in CON (p=0.32). The most common cfDNA mutations in CWD were TP53 (58%), NOTCH1 (19%), PIK3CA (16%), BRCA1 (13%), NF1 (13%), FGFR2 (13%), ESR1 (13%), STK11 (10%), NTRK1 (10%), APC (10%), and KIT (10%). In comparison, the most common cfDNA mutations in CON were TP53 (54%), PIK3CA (35%), ESR1 (14%), GATA3 (13%), and ATM (11%). Table 1 depicts mutations that varied between CWD and CON which were statistically significant in ≥1 cohort analyzed. In HR+/HER2- MBC, NOTCH1, STK11, NTRK1, DDR2, and NF1 were significantly more common in CWD than CON. For TNBC, NOTCH1 was numerically more common in CWD vs. CON (p=0.06). Conclusions: The cfDNA genomic spectrum of CWD varies from MBC that does not infiltrate the chest wall. Mutations that are associated with metastasis (NOTCH1), inhibition of tumor suppression (STK11), tumor migration (DDR2), proliferation (NTRK1), and endocrine resistance (NF1) were significantly more common in HR+/HER2- CWD than matched controls. Further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the impact of matched targeted therapies for CWD. Table 1 N/A: mutation not observed Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Lianne Ryan, Andrzej Niemierko, Dejan Juric, Steven J. Isakoff, Francys Verdial, Marjan Azin, Laura A. Petrillo, Beverly Moy, Leif Ellisen, Shadmehr Demehri, Aditya Bardia. Comparison of cell-free DNA genomics of breast cancer associated-chest wall disease vs. age & subtype matched controls with metastatic breast cancer not involving the chest wall [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-09.

Background: Clinical outcomes in breast cancer differ across racial and ethnic populations. We have previously demonstrated that receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation may potentially improve patient outcomes (Vidula, CCR, 2021). We evaluated the impact of race on clinical, socioeconomic, and genomic characteristics, clinical trial participation, and receipt of genotype-matched therapy among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with MBC at an academic institution who underwent cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA, Guardant360, 74 gene panel) as part of routine clinical care from 11/29/2016-11/2/2020. Patient demographics (including self-reported race and ethnicity) and clinical trial enrollment (at same institution) were determined by retrospective data collection. Mutations identified in cfDNA were characterized as actionable based on the variant interpretation performed by Guardant360 using vetted genomic databases, and receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation was determined as previously described (Vidula, CCR, 2021). Pearson’s chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables between groups, with p< 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: Four hundred and twenty-five patients with MBC and cfDNA results were identified, of which 369 were White (87%), 27 Black (6.4%), 15 Hispanic (3.5%), and 14 Asian (3.3%). There were no significant differences in median age at MBC diagnosis (p=0.064), disease subtype distribution (p=0.74), proportions of de-novo/recurrent MBC (p=0.95), presence of visceral metastases (p=0.84), Charleston comorbidity index (p=0.93), menopausal status (p=0.3), and level of education (p=0.44) across racial groups. Higher proportions of non-primary English speakers were seen in Hispanic (80%) and Asian (29%) races (p< 0.001). Median distance traveled to the institution also varied based on race, with White patients traveling further (White: 39.1 miles, Black: 21.8 miles, Hispanic 9.4 miles, Asian 9.1 miles, p< 0.001). In addition, type of insurance varied based on race, with White patients having the highest rates of commercial insurance and Medicare, Black patients having the highest rate of state-supported insurance, and Asian patients having the highest uninsured rates (p< 0.001). Clinical trial enrollment rates did not significantly differ by race (White: 44%, Black: 37%, Hispanic: 47%, and Asian 21%, p=0.34), but patients without insurance were significantly less likely to be enrolled on a trial than those with commercial insurance (p=0.03). The proportion of patients with ≥1 actionable mutation in cfDNA did not vary significantly by race (White: 78%, Black: 56%, Hispanic: 73%, Asian 86%, p=0.18) and the median number of actionable mutations found in cfDNA was similar across races (p=0.31). However, receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation varied by race, with the highest rates of matched therapy in White patients (White: 28%, Black: 11%, Hispanic 13%, Asian 14%, p< 0.001). After multivariable logistic regression adjusting for subtype, commercial insurance versus other insurance types, and proximity to the center, White patients remained significantly more likely to receive matched therapy (p=0.029). Conclusions: We observed significant race-based differences in non-English speaking status, insurance type, and median distance traveled to the institution. Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to receive genotype-matched therapy than White patients. Further research is needed to identify barriers and reduce disparities in access to precision medicine. Citation Format: Rupali Sood, Lianne Ryan, Andrzej Niemierko, Laura M. Spring, Dejan Juric, Steven J. Isakoff, Seth A. Wander, Jennifer Shin, Naomi Ko, Leif Ellisen, Beverly Moy, Aditya Bardia, Neelima Vidula. Impact of Race on Clinical, Socioeconomic, and Genomic Characteristics, Clinical Trial Participation, and Receipt of Genotype-matched Therapy Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-10.

Background: SG is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 for MBC). In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study, SG demonstrated a 34% reduction in risk of progression or death vs TPC in heavily pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– MBC (Rugo H, et al. ASCO 2022. LBA1001). The safety profile was manageable, with neutropenia and diarrhea as the key AEs. Absolute incidence rate is the most used metric to summarize AEs in routine clinical safety analyses. However, when the treatment duration differs significantly between treatment arms, these rates may need adjustment to account for longer treatment exposure, which may incur a higher incidence of AEs. Given that the median treatment duration was longer for SG in TROPiCS-02, EAIRs were assessed in post hoc safety analyses. Methods: Pts with HR+/HER2– unresectable locally advanced or MBC and 2-4 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by central review. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Time-at-risk EAIR considers pts’ exposure of a specific AE in quantifying the risk of AE, defined as the number of pts who experienced at least 1 specific AE, divided by the total exposure time (pt-year of exposure [PYE]) in each arm. For pts who experienced specific AEs, exposure time was calculated from first dose date up to the first AE onset, and for pts who did not, from first dose up to data cutoff (if still on study treatment) or up to last dose (if discontinued study treatment). The 95% CI of the EAIR difference is a standard method to assess the statistical significance of AE incidence rate differences between arms. Results: Of 543 pts enrolled (median age, 56 y; visceral metastases, 95%; prior CDK4/6 inhibitor for MBC, 99%; median lines of chemotherapy for MBC, 3), 517 pts (SG, n=268; TPC, n=249) received ≥1 dose of study treatment. At data cutoff (Jan 3, 2022), 18 pts (7%) vs 4 pts (2%) remained on treatment in the SG vs TPC arms; median treatment duration was 4.1 months and 2.3 months, respectively. The absolute incidence, EAIRs (incidence per 1 PYE), and EAIR differences for the overall safety summary and most common grade ≥3 TEAEs are provided (Table). Overall, SG had higher absolute incidence rates vs TPC for grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), serious AEs, and TEAEs leading to death, but the EAIRs were similar between arms, suggesting an association with duration of treatment exposure. When adjusted for exposure, the incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea remained higher for SG vs TPC; however, the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was similar between arms. Conclusions: The safety profile of SG was manageable in pts with heavily pretreated HR+/HER2– endocrine-resistant, unresectable locally advanced or MBC. Though there was a higher absolute incidence of TEAEs leading to death and grade ≥3 neutropenia with SG vs TPC, the EAIRs were similar. Taken together with the efficacy benefit with SG, this supports a favorable risk/benefit profile for SG compared with standard chemotherapy in this pt population with limited therapeutic options. Table. Overall Safety Summary and Summary of Common (Absolute Incidence ≥5%) Grade ≥3 TEAEs With Absolute Incidence, Exposure-Adjusted Incidence Rates (EAIRs),a and EAIR Differencesb,c Citation Format: Sara Tolaney, Peter Schmid, Aditya Bardia, Frederik Marmé, Delphine Loirat, Priyanka Sharma, Hao Wang, Olivia Fu, Wendy Verret, Hope Rugo. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of adverse events (AEs) from the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-08.

Background: Despite improved outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), attributed in part to advancements in precision therapeutics, clinical trial enrollment and genomic testing are relatively underutilized in the community oncology setting. To address this need, we launched a virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic to improve access for patients in our community network. Here we describe the initial results from the virtual clinic initiative. Methods: In 2020, the vMAP clinic was launched to provide real-time access to precision medicine expertise through virtual, email-based consultation directed to a multidisciplinary team. As part of the service, providers contacted vMAP regarding patients with MBC at the time of initial presentation or disease progression. Upon receipt, the vMAP team (including breast medical oncologists, a breast oncology research nurse, a research assistant, and ad hoc consultation from cancer genetics and molecular pathology representatives) engaged in discussion to identify potential clinical trials with slot availability or standard of care (SOC) options and provided recommendations to the referring provider within 72 hours. Relevant patient data and vMAP referral outcomes were recorded. Providers across the community network were surveyed at project onset and after seventeen months. Results: In its first 14-month period (June 2020-July 2021), 47 cases from 16 providers across seven community oncology sites and one academic site were referred to vMAP. A majority (88.6%) of patients had undergone somatic genomic testing (tissue-based, plasma-based, or both) to inform treatment guidance. All cases were screened for available clinical trials as well as SOC options at the time of referral. The average response time to the referring provider with a finalized recommendation was 1.77 days (range 0-5). Forty cases (85.1%) had clinical trial options identified on vMAP pre-screen. Subsequently, 22 patients (46.8%) screened for vMAP recommended clinical trials with 18 (38.3%) initiating enrollment. Of the remaining patients that did not pursue clinical trial screening, 17 (36.2%) started vMAP-recommended SOC treatment, five (10.6%) pursued a different treatment, one (2.1%) was not a candidate for further treatment, and two (4.3%) opted to receive care at a non-affiliated institution, and subsequent treatment information was not available. Reasons that patients did not enroll on trials included trial ineligibility, formal clinical trial screening failure, and patient/provider preference. At project onset, network provider survey results confirmed a previously suggested demand for improvements in processes surrounding genomic testing interpretation and clinical trial enrollment. Post-referral survey results indicated vMAP recommendations and pre-screenings improved the processes surrounding interpretation of genomic testing and clinical trial screening and enrollment, with high rates of referring provider satisfaction. Conclusion: A precision medicine virtual clinic demonstrated an efficient and flexible means to offer real-time interpretation of genomic and molecular test results and identification of appropriate treatment options, including clinical trials when applicable, for patients with MBC. The service highlights an example of an academic-community collaboration model to expand precision medicine and clinical trial access for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Lindsey Mortensen, Jennifer C. Keenan, Elizabeth Abraham, Sarah Padden, Annie Ma, Elyssa Denault, Lianne Ryan, Arielle J. Medford, Leif Ellisen, Joel H. Schwartz, Aditya Bardia, Laura M. Spring. Virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic to improve access to clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer: an academic-community collaboration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-01.

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd demonstrated compelling single-agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative BC (Krop, SABCS 2021). This is the first report of results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−; including HER2-low and HER2-zero) BC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical findings and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2− BC that progressed on standard therapies. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and DCR (CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of the April 29, 2022, data cutoff, 41 pts had received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 10.9 mo [range, 7-13]); 9 pts were ongoing. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (63%; progressive disease [PD] or clinical progression). Median age was 57 y (range, 33-75); 54% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated (Table) with a median of 5 (range, 3-10) prior regimens in the advanced setting; 95% had prior CDK4/6i (adjuvant/metastatic). Median time from initial treatment for metastatic disease to the first dose of Dato-DXd was 42.7 mo (range, 10.2-131.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) were observed in 98% (any grade) and 41% (grade ≥3) of pts. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (80%, 10%), nausea (56%, 0%), fatigue (46%, 2%), and alopecia (37%, 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 6 pts (15%); 1 pt died due to dyspnea, which was not considered to be treatment related. Dose reductions occurred in 5 pts due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), keratitis (n=1), and decreased appetite (n=1) (>1 AE per pt); 14 pts had treatment delayed due to stomatitis (n=8), retinopathy (n=1), dysphagia (n=1), fatigue (n=1), malaise (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1), decreased lymphocyte count (n=1), and nasal congestion (n=1; >1 AE per pt). Three pts discontinued treatment due to keratitis (n=1) and pneumonitis (n=2); 1 case of pneumonitis was adjudicated as grade 2 drug-related interstitial lung disease. The ORR was 29% (11 confirmed PRs; 1 pending confirmation), the DCR was 85% (35/41), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 41% (17/41). Conclusions: Dato-DXd demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity, with high disease control in heavily pretreated pts, the majority having received prior CDK4/6i. Based on these findings, the TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) randomized phase 3 study comparing 2L+ Dato-DXd vs investigator’s choice chemotherapy is currently enrolling pts with HR+/HER2− BC. Prior Therapies in the Adjuvant or Metastatic Setting Citation Format: Funda Meric-Bernstam, Ian Krop, Dejan Juric, Takahiro Kogawa, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Toru Mukohara, Takuya Tsunoda, Senthil Damodaran, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Aditya Bardia. PD13-08 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2–Negative Breast Cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-08.

Background: HER2 low breast cancer, defined as tumors with HER2 IHC expression 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification, represents a potential new therapeutic subgroup of metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, the clinical significance of HER2 low status in early BC remains unclear. Previously, the RxPONDER trial (NCT01272037), a prospective, randomized trial of endocrine therapy (ET) vs. chemoendocrine therapy (CET) in women with lymph node positive (LN+) BC, demonstrated invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with ET vs CET varies by menopausal status. We evaluated the impact of HER2 low vs zero status in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007), stratified by menopausal status and treatment groups. Methods: Eligibility criteria included women >/18 years of age with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) BC, Recurrence Score (RS) Results: Among the 4,983 eligible participants, 4,588 had IHC HER2 status available. 52% of 2,052 pre-menopausal women had HER2 low BC and 57% of 3,042 post-menopausal women had HER2 low BC. There was a small, but statistically significant (p=0.03) difference, in RS between HER2 low (mean 14.5) and HER2 zero (mean 14.1) status. The proportion of participants with HER2 low and zero were balanced between treatment group assignment (CET vs ET). Among pre-menopausal women adjusting for RS, CET led to an observed improvement in IDFS among both HER2 low (HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.04) and HER2 zero subgroups (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.36-0.89) (interaction p=0.55). Similarly, among post-menopausal women, there was no difference in IDFS between CET vs ET among both HER2 low (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.29) and HER2 zero (HR=1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.56) subgroups (interaction p=0.57). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for treatment arm, RS, and menopausal status, HER2 low status was not associated with worse IDFS compared to HER2 zero status (HR=0.93; 95% CI 0.78-1.11). Additionally, no differences were noted in DRFS. Conclusion: HER2 low or zero status had no impact on clinical outcomes with CET vs ET among pre-menopausal or post-menopausal women with HR+/HER- BC with 1-3+ LNs and RS Citation Format: Laura M. Spring, William E. Barlow, Aditya Bardia, Priyanka Sharma, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky. HER2-19 Impact of HER2 low status on clinical outcomes in participants with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, HR+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence score

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 mAb covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd has previously shown encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC (Krop, SABCS 2021). Here we report updated results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with advanced/metastatic TNBC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with advanced TNBC that relapsed/progressed on standard therapies; 2 pts received 8 mg/kg prior to selection of 6 mg/kg. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of April 29, 2022, 44 pts received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 16.6 mo [range, 13-22]) at the time of data cutoff. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (86%; PD or clinical progression), and 4 pts are still receiving therapy. Median age was 53 y (range, 32-82); 32% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 (range, 1-10) prior regimens in the metastatic setting. Prior treatments included taxanes (91%), anthracyclines (75%), capecitabine (61%), platinum (52%), immunotherapy (43%), Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (32%), and PARPi (18%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) occurred in 100% (any grade) and 50% (grade ≥3) of pts, respectively. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (73%, 11%), nausea (66%, 2%), vomiting (39%, 5%), fatigue (34%, 7%), and alopecia (36%, 0%). One pt had grade 3 decreased neutrophil count; no cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) or grade ≥3 diarrhea were observed. Serious TEAEs were reported in 9 pts (20%); no deaths associated with adverse events (AEs) were observed. Dose reductions occurred in 8 pts (18%) due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), dry eye (n=1), retinal exudates (n=1), and dysgeusia (n=1); 12 pts (27%) delayed treatment due to stomatitis (n=5), dry eye (n=1), keratitis (n=1), blurred vision (n=1), fatigue (n=1), bronchitis (n=1), skin infection (n=1), musculoskeletal chest pain (n=1), dysgeusia (n=1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1), and dyspnea (n=1; >1 AE per pt). One pt (2%) discontinued treatment due to grade 1 pneumonitis (which was centrally adjudicated as not ILD). ORR in all pts was 32% (1 CR, 13 PRs), DCR was 80% (35/44), and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 34% (15/44). Median duration of response was not yet reached; median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-7.3), and median overall survival (mOS) was 12.9 mo (95% CI, 10.1-14.7). In the subset of pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy and with measurable disease at baseline, ORR was 44% (12/27). Among all pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (n=30), mPFS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE), and mOS was 14.3 mo (95% CI, 10.5-NE). Conclusions: Dato-DXd continues to demonstrate encouraging and durable antitumor activity, along with a manageable safety profile, in heavily pretreated pts with metastatic TNBC. Based on these findings, the phase 3 randomized TROPION-Breast02 (NCT05374512) trial comparing Dato-DXd vs chemotherapy as 1L therapy for pts with metastatic TNBC is currently underway. Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Ian Krop, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Anthony W. Tolcher, Toru Mukohara, Aaron Lisberg, Toshio Shimizu, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Takahiro Kogawa. Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2), a potent negative regulator of p53, promotes tumorigenesis if dysregulated. MDM2 dysregulation occurs via different mechanisms, including MDM2 gene amplification, MDM2 overexpression, and loss of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), which encodes the MDM2 regulator p14ARF. Combined inactivation of MDM2 and GATA3 in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is lethal to the cell. Pharmacologic inhibition of MDM2 is a rational therapeutic strategy for MDM2-dependent, TP53 wildtype (WT) tumors, including tumors with MDM2 amplification or CDKN2A loss, and GATA3-mutant HR+ breast cancers. We determined the frequency and associated characteristics of genetic alterations of MDM2-dependent breast cancers, and evaluated sensitivity of these tumors to the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (RAIN-32). Methods: Genomic data were obtained from three datasets: METABRIC; TCGA PanCancer Atlas, GDC v23.0 (April 2020); AACR Genie, v11. Among TP53 WT breast cancer samples from each dataset, the frequency of GATA3 frameshift mutations, MDM2 amplification (copy number [CN] ≥12), and CDKN2A homozygous loss was determined individually and as co-alterations. The antitumoral activity of milademetan was evaluated in a GATA3-mutant, TP53 WT HR+ breast cancer cell line (MCF7 GATA3 G336fs*17), a breast xenograft model (MCF7 GATA3 G335fs), and ex vivo in MDM2-amplified patient-derived breast cancer organoids (CTG-2810, ER+/PR+/HER2–, MDM2 CN 8). Results: Genetic alteration frequencies in TP53 WT breast cancers by dataset are shown in the Table. GATA3 frameshift mutations (7.3–11.7%), MDM2 amplification (0.3–1.1%), and CDKN2A loss (0.2–1.2%) occurred across breast tumors, but were found with highest frequencies in HR+ tumors. Co-alteration frequencies in TP53 WT breast cancers across the aforementioned datasets were < 1%: GATA3 mutations/MDM2 CN ≥12 (0.2–0.3%); GATA3 mutations/CDKN2A loss (0.1–0.2%); MDM2 CN ≥12/CDKN2A loss (0%). Mean MDM2 expression (log2 (TPM+1)) in HR+ breast cancers (TCGA) were: GATA3 mutations, 5.12; CDKN2A loss, 5.88; MDM2 CN ≥12, 8.13, TP53 WT without these alterations, 4.78; mutant TP53, 4.35. A GATA3-mutant ER+ breast cancer cell line was sensitive to milademetan in vitro (IC50 126 nM). Milademetan 100 mg/kg displayed antitumor activity in GATA3-mutant HR+ breast xenograft and PDX models (p< 0.05 vs. vehicle). Milademetan also displayed activity in MDM2-amplified HR+ breast cancer organoids (IC50 0.2 μM). In a phase I study (NCT01877382), a patient with heavily pretreated MDM2-amplified breast cancer (MDM2 CN 16.8) had tumor shrinkage (18.2%) and PFS of 7.3 months with milademetan (orally 260 mg 3/14 days). Conclusions: The frequency of genetic alterations potentially targetable by MDM2 inhibition among TP53 WT breast cancers (i.e., GATA3 mutations, MDM2 amplification, and CDKN2A loss) is greatest in the HR+ subset, and these genetic biomarkers are associated with higher MDM2 expression. Preclinical data show that the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan has antitumor activity in GATA3-mutant and MDM2-amplified HR+ breast cancers, and support the clinical evaluation of milademetan in these tumors. Two clinical trials of milademetan – MANTRA-2 (Phase 2 basket study in solid tumors with TP53 WT and MDM2 CN ≥12; NCT05012397) and MANTRA-4 (Phase 1 study of milademetan + atezolizumab in solid tumors with CDKN2A loss) – are enrolling patients or in planning. Table. Citation Format: Francois-Clement Bidard, Diana Bello Roufai, Arielle J. Medford, Vijaya Tirunagaru, Robert C. Doebele, Aditya Bardia. Genetic alterations in breast cancer associated with MDM2 dependency and sensitivity to the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-10.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is synergistic with HER2-directed therapy in pre-clinical models. Clinically, pembrolizumab (K)-mediated ICI plus HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab (H) was safe and demonstrated modest activity in H-resistant HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Because ICI may confer more robust activity when administered earlier in the course of disease, H and K administered in the curative-intent, treatment-naive setting may allow for de-escalation of cytotoxic chemotherapy; confer life-long, tumor-specific immunity; and ultimately, improve cure rates. Moreover, the synergy of H and K with paclitaxel (T) may overcome the need for dual HER2-blockade with H plus pertuzumab (P). In this randomized, multicenter, phase II, open-label, multi-center trial the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant THP vs THP-K vs TH-K are explored. Methods: 174 patients (pts) ≥18y with previously untreated, stage II-III, HER2+ breast cancer will be randomized and stratified by clinical nodal status (positive vs. negative) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). In arm A, pts receive T at 80mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, H at 8mg/Kg (loading dose) and then 6mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses, P at 840 mg (loading dose) and then 420mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP). In arm B, pts receive THP plus K at 200mg every 3 weeks x 4 doses (THP-K). In arm C, pts receive TH-K; however, in a preplanned interim analysis, arm C did not meet the pre-defined efficacy threshold and this arm was subsequently closed. Enrollment to arms A and B continue. Definitive surgery is 3-6 weeks after the last dose. After surgery, pts are treated per the treating physician’s discretion including radiotherapy per local clinical standard. Pts whose tumors are hormone-receptor positive will receive hormone therapy per local standard-of-care. The primary end point is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and axilla (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Secondary end points include pCR rate by ypT0ypN0 and ypT0/Tis, residual cancer burden index, event free survival, breast conserving surgery rate, safety and overall survival. Exploratory correlative studies will characterize potential immune biomarkers predictive of efficacy and/or toxicity. Funding sources: BCRF, Merck NCT03747120 Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Jorge Henrique Santos Leal, Christina DiLauro Abaya, Sangeetha Reddy, Meredith Carter, Reva Basho, Michelle Phillips, David Chan, Hugo Hool, Dorothy Park, Mary El-Masry, Philomena McAndrew, Swati Sikaria, Laura M. Spring, Aditya Bardia, Mourad Tighiouart, Farnaz Dadmanesh, Armando Giuliano, Stephen Shiao, David B. Page. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-25-01.

Background: PARP inhibitors are currently approved for the treatment of germline BRCA1/2 mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which accounts for 5-10% of breast cancer. We hypothesize that a PARP inhibitor may also have efficacy in somatic BRCA1/2 mutant MBC, expanding the potential clinical applicability of PARP inhibitors. We previously demonstrated that somatic BRCA1/2 mutations can be identified by both cell-free DNA and tumor tissue genotyping in a subset of patients with MBC who are not germline BRCA1/2 carriers. Furthermore, a PARP inhibitor was demonstrated to induce cell growth inhibition in a circulating tumor cell culture model generated from a patient with pathogenic somatic BRCA1 mutant MBC (Vidula, Dubash, CCR, 2020). In this trial, we are evaluating the efficacy of a PARP inhibitor in somatic BRCA1/2 mutant MBC. Trial Design: This phase II investigator-initiated clinical trial is enrolling 30 patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutant MBC identified via cell-free DNA or tumor tissue genotyping. Patients are treated with talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor, until disease progression. At baseline and every 3 months, patients undergo CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and a bone scan for disease assessment. Patients undergo blood collection at baseline for the Cancer Risk B (CR-B) assay, a novel flow variant assay to assess double-strand break repair mutations in circulating blood cells (Syeda, 2017) and monthly blood collection for cell-free DNA analysis to evaluate changes in the genomic environment. Eligibility Criteria: Patients with MBC with a pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutation identified by cell-free DNA or tumor tissue genotyping are eligible. Both patients with triple-negative breast cancer (≥ 1 prior chemotherapy) or hormone receptor positive/HER2- MBC (≥ 1 prior hormone therapy) are eligible. Patients should not be known germline BRCA1/2 carriers. There is no limit on prior therapies including receipt of a prior platinum (in the absence of disease progression on prior platinum). A prior PARP inhibitor is not allowed. Adequate performance status and organ function are needed. Specific Aims: Primary aim is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by RECIST 1.1. Secondary aims include objective response rate and toxicity assessed by NCI CTCAE v 5.0. Exploratory aims include assessing impact of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in cell-free DNA, studying serial changes in BRCA1/2 mutant allelic frequency in cell-free DNA, comparing pre- and post-treatment cell-free DNA results to identify changes in the genomic environment, assessing the CR-B assay positivity rate, and correlating these biomarker analyses with patient response. Statistical Methods: This study uses a two-stage design with 80% power to demonstrate that talazoparib is associated with “success” (PFS > 12 weeks) in 53% patients (4% alpha). Accrual: This study (NCT03990896) is open at Massachusetts General Hospital, MD Anderson, University of California San Francisco, and Emory, with pending activation at Northwestern, Cornell, and Vanderbilt. Five patients are enrolled as of 7/2022. Funding: This study is supported by a Pfizer ASPIRE award and Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO–Breast Cancer Research Foundation- Career Development Award. Contact information: Neelima Vidula, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Senthil Damodaran, Erica L. Blouch, Nora Horick, Nathan Royce Ruffle-Deignan, Manali Bhave, Ami N. Shah, Leticia Varella, Vandana Abramson, Joseph Sparano, Leif Ellisen, Ishraq Alim, Harry Ostrer, Hope Rugo, Aditya Bardia. Phase II study of talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor, in somatic BRCA1/2 mutant metastatic breast cancer identified by cell-free DNA or tumor tissue genotyping [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-11-01.

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are standard of care for the management of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Genomic alterations that drive resistance to CDK4/6i are diverse, and while the molecular landscape is heterogeneous, several mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance converge on the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. NF1 downregulates RAS and dampens cellular proliferation. Laboratory-based models demonstrate that loss of NF1 is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), and emergence of NF1 mutations (NF1m) are correlated with progressive disease (PD) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). While NF1m may diminish CDK4/6i susceptibility, a clear relationship has not been elucidated. The primary objective of this study was to characterize patient (pt) response to CDK4/6i in NF1m HR+/HER2- MBC. Methods: We identified 47 pts with NF1m via a database with one or more ctDNA samples sequenced at variable time-points as part of routine care for MBC. NF1m were categorized as pathogenic (p)NF1m or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) based on their associated Guardant report. We identified 27 pts with HR+/HER2- MBC and NF1m that received at least 1 line of CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting. Intrinsic resistance was defined as PD < 6 months on a CDK4/6i regimen, and acquired resistance was defined as PD >6 months. Pts with intrinsic resistance or acquired resistance and NF1m detected post-PD were categorized as having a resistance phenotype potentially driven by NF1m. Pts with NF1m detected prior to therapy and >6 months clinical response on a CDK4/6i were categorized as having NF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i. Results: The NF1m cohort (n = 27) had 9 pts with pNF1m, while 18 pts expressed VUS. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 54 years, and 67% had visceral metastasis at ctDNA collection. Pts received a median of 1 prior line (range: 0 - 6) of ET or chemotherapy in the metastatic setting before CDK4/6i. Amongst pts with pathogenic variants (n = 9), we found 3 pts with pNF1m were intrinsically resistant to CDK4/6i. Acquired resistance was seen in 1 pt with pNF1m detected post-PD, and 2 pts had evidence of both acquired and subsequent intrinsic resistance to a later line of CDK4/6i. Overall, 67% (6/9) of pNF1m pts demonstrated a CDK4/6i resistance phenotype; mutant allele fraction (AF) ranged from 0.2% - 29.9%, and the mean maximum allele fraction (MAF) was 6.0%. Pre- and post-treatment samples were available on 3 pts with pNF1m, and 1 of these pts had an AF rise from 2.7% to 12.3% when comparing ctDNA pre- and post-CDK4/6i. ctDNA from 4 of 6 resistant tumors harbored other putative drivers including alterations in FGFR, KRAS, PTEN, and RB. We identified 2 counter-examples of pNF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i. These pts expressed relatively low NF1m AF, ranging 0.1% - 0.5% with a mean MAF 0.3%. Another pNF1m pt had intrinsic resistance to initial CDK4/6i but was sensitive to later-line CDK4/6i. In the subgroup of pts with VUS-NF1m (n = 18), a more mixed picture of resistance and sensitivity was seen. 8 pts had intrinsic or acquired resistance, 8 pts had NF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i, and 1 pt had evidence of both; 61% (n = 11) of pts expressed alterations in other resistance mediating genes. 1 pt stopped therapy due to toxicity rather than PD. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that tumor expression of pNF1m may be associated with CDK4/6i resistance in pts with HR+/HER2- MBC, and allele fraction could be predictive of drug susceptibility. Tumors harboring VUS had varied sensitivity, suggesting that some of these mutations may not be pathogenic, and counter-examples of pNF1m MBC benefiting from CDK4/6i plus ET highlight the complexities in predicting drug response based on single gene alteration. Future effort is warranted to explore the potential impact of NF1 on CDK4/6i resistance, as well as the potential role for therapies targeting the MAPK pathway in this patient population. Citation Format: Maxwell R. Lloyd, Lianne Ryan, Arielle J. Medford, Jennifer C. Keenan, Laura M. Spring, Neelima Vidula, Beverly Moy, Dejan Juric, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia, Seth A. Wander. Investigating NF1 Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Hormone-receptor Positive (HR+) Breast Tumors Resistant to CDK4/6 Inhibition (CDK4/6i): A Retrospective Clinical Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-07.

The absence of effective therapeutic targets and aggressive nature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) renders this disease subset difficult to treat. Although estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is expressed in TNBC, studies on its functional role have yielded inconsistent results. However, recently, our preclinical studies, along with other observations, have shown the potential therapeutic utility of ERβ in the context of mutant p53 expression. The current case study examines the efficacy of the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen in p53-mutant TNBC with brain metastases. Significant increase in ERβ protein expression and anti-proliferative interaction between mutant p53 and ERβ were observed after cessation of tamoxifen therapy, with significant regression of brain metastases. This case study provides supporting evidence for the use of tamoxifen in p53-mutant, ERβ+TNBC, especially in the setting of brain metastasis.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are rapidly evolving therapies that are uniquely able to deliver potent chemotherapy specifically to cancer cells while largely sparing normal cells. ADCs have 3 components: (1) antibody targeted to a tumor-involved antigen, (2) cytotoxic payload, and (3) linker that connects the cytotoxic agent to the antibody. Once the antibody binds the target on the cell surface, the ADC is incorporated into the cell via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Inside the cells, the linker is cleaved in the lysosome and the payload is then released intracellularly. This article will review ADCs in clinical development for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.