Search

Aim: Differentiating alcoholic hepatitis (AH) from acute decompensation of alcoholic cirrhosis (DC) is challenging, as the presentation and biochemistry are similar. We aimed to identify potential metabolomic biomarkers to differentiate between AH and DC, and to predict short-term mortality. Methods: We included consecutive biopsy proven AH and DC patients, which were managed according to current guidelines and followed up until the end of the study. Untargeted metabolomics was assessed in all patients at baseline. Specific analyses were successively performed to identify potential biomarkers, which were further semi-quantitatively analysed against relevant clinical endpoints. Results: Thirty-four patients with AH and 37 with DC were included. UHPLC-MS analysis identified 83 molecules potentially differentiating between AH and DC. C16-Sphinganine-1P (S1P) was the most increased, whereas Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was the most decreased. The PGE2/S1P ratio

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) arises from the ductular epithelium of the biliary tree, either within the liver (intrahepatic CCA) or more commonly from the extrahepatic bile ducts (extrahepatic CCA). This disease has a poor prognosis and a growing worldwide prevalence. The poor outcomes of CCA are partially explained by the fact that a final diagnosis is challenging, especially the differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic CCA, or distal CCA and pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Most patients present with an advanced disease, unresectable disease, and there is a lack in non-surgical therapeutic modalities. Not least, there is an acute lack of prognostic biomarkers which further complicates disease management. Therefore, there is a dire need to find alternative diagnostic and follow-up pathways that can lead to an accurate result, either singlehandedly or combined with other methods. In the "-omics" era, this goal can be attained by various means, as it has been successfully demonstrated in other primary tumors. Numerous variants can reach a biomarker status ranging from circulating nucleic acids to proteins, metabolites, extracellular vesicles, and ultimately circulating tumor cells. However, given the relatively heterogeneous data, extracting clinical meaning from the inconsequential noise might become a tall task. The current review aims to navigate the nascent waters of the non-invasive approach to CCA and provide an evidence-based input to aid clinical decisions and provide grounds for future research.

Liquid biopsies do promise a lot, but are they keeping it? In the past decade, additional novel biomarkers qualified to be called like that, of which, some took necessary hurdles resulting in FDA approval and clinical use. Some others are since a while around, well known and were once regarded to be a game changer in cancer diagnosis or cancer screening. But, during their clinical use limitations were observed from statistical significance and questions raised regarding their robustness, that eventually led to be dropped from associated clinical guidelines for certain applications including cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this review isn't to give a broad overview of all current liquid biopsy as biomarkers, weight them and promise a brighter future in cancer prevention, but rather to take a deeper look on two of those who do qualify to be called liquid biopsies now or then. These two are probably of greatest interest conceptually and methodically, and likely have the highest chances to be in clinical use soon, with a portfolio extension over their original conceptual usage. We aim to dig deeper beyond cancer diagnosis or cancer screening. Actually, we aim to review in depth extracellular vesicles (EVs) and compare with circulating tumour cells (CTCs). The latter methodology is partially FDA approved and in clinical use. We will lay out similarities as taking advantage of surface antigens on EVs and CTCs in case of characterization and quantification. But drawing readers' attention to downstream application based on capture/isolation methodology and simply on their overall nature, here apparently being living material eventually recoverable as CTCs are vs. dead material with transient effects on recipient cell as in case of EVs. All this we try to bring in perspective, compare and conclude towards which future direction we are aiming for, or should aim for. Do we announce a winner between CTCs vs EVs? No, but we provide good reasons to intensify research on them.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is a primary liver tumor associated with a dim prognosis. The role of preoperative and palliative biliary drainage has long been debated. The most common techniques are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD); however, recently developed endoscopic ultrasound-assisted methods are gaining more atention. Selecting the best available method in any specific scenario is crucial, yet sometimes challenging. Thus, this review aimed to discuss the available techniques, indications, perks, pitfalls, and timing-related issues in the management of hCCA. In a preoperative setting, PTBD appears to have some advantages: low risk of postprocedural complications (namely cholangitis) and better priming for surgery. For palliative purposes, we propose ERCP/PTBD depending on the experience of the operators, but also on other factors: the level of bilirubin (if very high, rather PTBD), length of the stenosis and the presence of cholangitis (PTBD), ERCP failure, or altered biliary anatomy.

Hemostasis is a complex physiological process based on the balance between pro-coagulant and anticoagulant systems to avoid pathological bleeding or thrombosis. The changes in standard coagulation tests in liver disease were assumed to reflect an acquired bleeding disorder, and cirrhotic patients were considered naturally anticoagulated. In the light of the new evidence, the theory of rebalanced hemostasis replaced the old concept. According to this model, the hemostatic alteration leads to a unique balance between pro-coagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic systems. But the balance is fragile and may prone to bleeding or thrombosis depending on various risk factors. The standard coagulation tests [INR (international normalized ratio), platelet count and fibrinogen] only explore parts of the hemostasis, not offering an entire image of the process. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG) are both point of care viscoelastic tests (VET) that provide real-time and dynamic information about the entire hemostasis process, including clot initiation (thrombin generation), clot kinetics, clot strength, and clot stability (lysis). Despite prolonged PT/INR (international normalized ratio of prothrombin time) and low platelet counts, VET is within the normal range in many patients with both acute and chronic liver disease. However, bleeding remains the dominant clinical issue in patients with liver diseases, especially when invasive interventions are required. VET has been shown to asses more appropriately the risk of bleeding than conventional laboratory tests, leading to decrial use of blood products transfusion. Inappropriate clotting is common but often subtle and may be challenging to predict even with the help of VET. Although VET has shown its benefit, more studies are needed to establish cut-off values for TEG and ROTEM in these populations and standardization of transfusion guidelines before invasive interventions in cirrhotic patients/orthotopic liver transplantation.

International audience; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a percutaneous radiologic-guided procedure that aims to reduce portal hypertension by creating a shunt between the portal venous system and the hepatic venous system. The most common cause of portal hypertension is liver cirrhosis in Western countries. Two main indications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are validated by randomised controlled studies in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding (salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or rebleeding despite an optimal secondary prophylaxis) or refractory ascites. Careful selection of the patients is crucial in order to prevent posttransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt complications, including liver failure, posttransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt encephalopathy occurrence and cardiac decompensation, for a better long-term outcome. In this review, we will discuss transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt indications in 2020 in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, with a special focus on variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. Then, we will describe transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications, the contraindications and the current knowledge on patient's selection.

Background & Aims: Corticosteroids are the only effective therapy for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), defined by a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score >20. However, there are patients who may be too sick to benefit from therapy. Herein, we aimed to identify the range of MELD scores within which steroids are effective for AH. Methods: We performed a retrospective, international multi-center cohort study across 4 continents, including 3,380 adults with a clinical and/or histological diagnosis of AH. The main outcome was mortality at 30 days. We used a discrete-time survival analysis model, and MELD cut-offs were established using the transform-the-endpoints method. Results: In our cohort, median age was 49 (40-56) years, 76.5% were male, and 79% had underlying cirrhosis. Median MELD at admission was 24 (19-29). Survival was 88% (87-89) at 30 days, 77% (76-78) at 90 days, and 72% (72-74) at 180 days. A total of 1,225 patients received corticosteroids. In an adjusted-survival-model, corticosteroid use decreased 30-day mortality by 41% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 0.47-0.74; p 51. The type of corticosteroids used (prednisone, pred-nisolone, or methylprednisolone) was not associated with sur-vival benefit (p = 0.247). Conclusion: Corticosteroids improve 30-day survival only among patients with severe AH, especially with MELD scores between 25 and 39. Lay summary: Alcohol-associated hepatitis is a condition where the liver is severely inflamed as a result of excess alcohol use. It is associated with high mortality and it is not clear whether the most commonly used treatments (corticosteroids) are effective, particularly in patients with very severe liver disease. In this worldwide study, the use of corticosteroids was associated with increased 30-day, but not 90-or 180-day, survival. The maximal benefit was observed in patients with an MELD score (a marker of severity of liver disease; higher scores signify worse disease) between 25-39. However, this benefit was lost in patients with the most severe liver disease (MELD score higher than 51). (C) 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

The time for battling cancer has never been more suitable than nowadays and fortunately against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we do have a far-reaching arsenal. Moreover, because liver cancer comprises a plethora of stages-from very early to advanced disease and with many treatment options���from surgery to immunotherapy trials���it leaves the clinician a wide range of options. The scope of our review is to throw light on combination treatments that seem to be beyond guidelines and to highlight these using evidence-based analysis of the most frequently used combination therapies, discussing their advantages and flaws in comparison to the current standard of care. One particular combination therapy seems to be in the forefront: Transarterial chemoembolization plus ablation for medium-size non-resectable HCC (3-5 cm), which is currently at the frontier between Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A and B. Not only does it improve the outcome in contrast to each individual therapy, but it also seems to have similar results to surgery. Also, the abundance of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have appeared lately in clinical trials are bringing promising results against HCC. Although the path of combination therapies in HCC is still filled with uncertainty and caveats, in the following years the hepatology and oncology fields could witness an HCC guideline revolution.

Background & Aims: The SALVE Histopathology Group (SHG) developed and validated a grading and staging system for the clinical and full histological spectrum of alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and evaluated its prognostic utility in a multinational cohort of 445 patients. Methods: SALVE grade was described by semiquantitative scores for steatosis, activity (hepatocellular injury and lobular neutrophils) and cholestasis. The histological diagnosis of steatohepatitis due to ALD (histological ASH, hASH) was based on the presence of hepatocellular ballooning and lobular neutrophils. Fibrosis staging was adapted from the Clinical Research Network staging system for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the Laennec staging system and reflects the pattern and extent of ALD fibrosis. There are 7 SALVE fibrosis stages (SFS) ranging from no fibrosis to severe cirrhosis. Results: Interobserver κ-value for each grading and staging parameter was >0.6. In the whole study cohort, long-term outcome was associated with activity grade and cholestasis, as well as cirrhosis with very broad septa (severe cirrhosis) (p, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting. Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p 0.0001), especially if HVPG 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039). 2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH.ZIEL: Klinisch signifikante portale Hypertonie (CSPH) ist für die meisten Komplikationen bei Patienten mit Zirrhose verantwortlich. Die Messung der Lebersteifigkeit (LS) mittels vibrationsgesteuerter transienter Elastografie (VCTE) wird derzeit zur Abschätzung einer CSPH verwendet. Die 2-dimensionale Scherwellenelastografie von General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) wurde für die Diagnose der PHT noch nicht validiert. Unser Ziel war es zu untersuchen, ob die LS mittels 2D-SWE.GE in der Lage ist, eine CSPH abzuschätzen, die Zuverlässigkeitskriterien der Methode zu bestimmen und ihre Treffsicherheit in diesem klinischen Anwendungsbereich mit der VCTE-LS zu vergleichen. Patienten mit chronischer Lebererkrankung, die für einen Lebervenendruckgradienten (HVPG) mittels Lebervenenkatheter vorgesehen wurden, wurden nacheinander eingeschlossen. HVPG und LS wurden sowohl mittels VCTE als auch 2D-SWE.GE am selben Tag durchgeführt. Die diagnostische Leistung jeder LS-Methode wurde mit dem HVPG sowie untereinander verglichen. 2D-SWE.GE-LS war bei 123/127 (96,90 %) Patienten durchführbar. Die Fähigkeit, mindestens 5 LS-Messungen mit 2D-SWE.GE und einer IQR 30 % aufzuzeichnen, waren die einzigen Parameter, die zu zuverlässigen Ergebnissen führten. Die 2D-SWE.GE-LS korrelierte stark mit dem HVPG (r = 0,704; p 0,0001), insbesondere bei HVPG 1 mmHg, und war bei Patienten mit CSPH signifikant höher (15,52 vs. 8,14 kPa; p 0,0001). Bei einen Cut-off von 11,3 kPa betrug die AUROC der 2D-SWE.GE-LS zum Nachweis einer CSPH 0,91, was der VCTE-LS nicht unterlegen war (0,92; p = 0,79). Die diagnostische Genauigkeit der LS mittels 2D-SWE.GE-LS zur Erkennung von einer CSPH war ähnlich wie bei VCTE-LS (83,74 % gegenüber 85,37 %; p = 0,238). Die diagnostische Genauigkeit wurde durch den Einsatz unterschiedlicher Cut-offs, die die Sensitivität oder Spezifität erhöhten, nicht verbessert. In der Untergruppe der kompensierten Patienten mit alkoholbedingter Lebererkrankung klassifizierte die 2D-SWE.GE-LS eine CSPH jedoch besser als die VCTE-LS (93,33 % gegenüber 85,71 %, p = 0,039). Für die Diagnose der CSPH zeigt die 2D-SWE.GE-LS eine gute Treffsicherheit – diese ist nicht schlechter als die der VCTE-LS.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is probably the epitome of a screening target, with a well-defined high-risk population, accessible screening methods, and multiple curative-intent treatments available for early disease. Per major societies guideline consensus, biannual ultrasound (US) surveillance of the at-risk patients is the current standard of care worldwide. Yet, despite its documented success in the past decades, this standard is far from perfect. While the whole community is working to further tighten the knots, a worrying number of cases still slip through this safety net. Consequently, these patients lose their chance to a curative solution which leads to a high disease burden with disproportionate mortality. While US will probably remain the fundamental staple in the screening strategy, key questions are seeking better answers. How can its caveats be addressed, and the technique be improved? When are further steps needed? How to increase accuracy without giving up on accessibility? This narrative review discusses the place of US surveillance in the bigger HCC picture, trying to navigate through its strengths and limits based on the most recent available evidence.