Search

Introduction: Acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) caused by vertebral artery stump syndrome (VASS) has a low incidence and is always underestimated. Due to the occlusion of the origin of the vertebral artery (VA), it is often combined with basilar artery (BA) endovascular diseases or non-dominant contralateral vertebral artery, making the endovascular treatment (EVT) challenging to implement. Objective: This article focuses on whether EVT and two interventional route options could bring clinical benefits to this group of patients: basilar artery thrombectomy through the occluded lateral vertebral artery and implementing revascularization of the occluded vertebral artery (dirty-road-path); thrombectomy through the non-occluded lateral vertebral artery (clean-road-path). Methods: We collected six cases of acute embolic basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) due to VASS from January 2020 to December 2021 at our hospital and retrospectively analyzed 31 patients previously reported in the literature and applied statistical analysis to investigate the treatment options and clinical prognosis of these patients. Results: The clean-road-path surgical protocol was applied in 4 of 37 patients, the dirty-road-path protocol was applied in 29 patients, and 4 patients did not recanalized the basilar artery. By statistical analysis we found that successful recanalization of the basilar artery was clinically significant in reducing the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores in these patients, the statistical difference in the benefit of the two surgical protocols was negative. There was a significant positive correlation between preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and postoperative 90-day mRS scores. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment can benefit patients with ABAO due to VASS, and patients with higher preoperative NIHSS scores are more vulnerable to getting a poor prognosis. Comparison between the two endovascular options did not yield statistically significant results, but the dirty-road-path option may be superior to using the clean-road-path.

Introduction: Acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) caused by vertebral artery stump syndrome (VASS) has a low incidence and is always underestimated. Due to the occlusion of the origin of the vertebral artery (VA), it is often combined with basilar artery (BA) endovascular diseases or non-dominant contralateral vertebral artery, making the endovascular treatment (EVT) challenging to implement., Objective: This article focuses on whether EVT and two interventional route options could bring clinical benefits to this group of patients: basilar artery thrombectomy through the occluded lateral vertebral artery and implementing revascularization of the occluded vertebral artery (dirty-road-path); thrombectomy through the non-occluded lateral vertebral artery (clean-road-path)., Methods: We collected six cases of acute embolic basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) due to VASS from January 2020 to December 2021 at our hospital and retrospectively analyzed 31 patients previously reported in the literature and applied statistical analysis to investigate the treatment options and clinical prognosis of these patients., Results: The clean-road-path surgical protocol was applied in 4 of 37 patients, the dirty-road-path protocol was applied in 29 patients, and 4 patients did not recanalized the basilar artery. By statistical analysis we found that successful recanalization of the basilar artery was clinically significant in reducing the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores in these patients, the statistical difference in the benefit of the two surgical protocols was negative. There was a significant positive correlation between preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and postoperative 90-day mRS scores., Conclusion: Endovascular treatment can benefit patients with ABAO due to VASS, and patients with higher preoperative NIHSS scores are more vulnerable to getting a poor prognosis. Comparison between the two endovascular options did not yield statistically significant results, but the dirty-road-path option may be superior to using the clean-road-path., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (©2023TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.)

Background: Few studies have investigated the association between plasma Homocysteine (Hcy) levels in patients with recanalization after acute Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO)., Objective: This study investigated the predictive value of Hcy on the clinical prognosis of patients with recanalization after acute BAO., Methods: Altogether, 829 participants were recruited from the standard medical treatment plus endovascular treatment group of the Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study (BASILAR). Hcy levels were measured the morning after admission. The primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale score 4-6) at 90 days, and the secondary outcome was the mortality of patients with recanalization after acute BAO within 90 days. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to estimate the association between Hcy and prognosis in our participants at 90 days., Results: Altogether, 647 patients were assessed, and 302 patients were included in this study. The median was 12.88 μmol/L, and the mean Hcy concentration was 15.49 μmol/L. Elevated plasma Hcy levels (Hcy >12.88 μmol/L) were associated with poor functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.922, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.048-3.528, P=0.035), but not with mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.605, 95% CI 0.986-2.489, P=0.058). In further subgroup analysis, the conclusion was consistent in all predefined subgroups., Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that elevated plasma Hcy levels have a predictive value for functional outcomes in patients with recanalization after acute BAO during the 90-day follow-up period, but not for mortality., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)